Public Health and Hygiene, by the Irish Law Times and Solicitors' Journal and by the Municipal Journal & Local Government Administrator. The accuracy of Who's Who, 1942 was praised by the Journal of the Royal Institute of Public Health and Hygiene and by The Accountant. The accuracy of Who's Who, 1943 was praised by the Medical Press and Circular. The accuracy of certain entries in Who's Who, 1944 was praised by the Journal of the Royal Institute of Public Health and Hygiene. The accuracy of Who's Who, 1946 was praised by the Irish Law Times and Solicitors' Journal. The accuracy of Who's Who, 1949 was praised by Subscription Books Bulletin. In 1957, the reliability of Who's Who was praised by Ajit Kumar Mukherjee. The accuracy and reliability of Who's Who 1970 was praised by Bodhan S Wynar. The accuracy of Who's Who 1973 was praised by Reference and Subscription Books Reviews. In 1974, the reliability of Who's Who was praised by John Richard Meredith Wilson. In 1975, the accuracy of Who's Who was praised by Carolyn Sue Peterson. The accuracy of Who's Who 1982 was praised by Jefferson D Caskey. The accuracy of Who's Who 1985 was praised by Jefferson D Caskey. In 1986, the reliability of Who's Who was praised by John Richard Meredith Wilson. The accuracy of the entry for Reginald William Revans in Who's Who 1987 was praised by Yury Boshyk and Robert L Dilworth. In 1995, the reliability of Who's Who was praised by Glenda Norquay. Three articles by Watson-Smyth, by Crick and Rosenbaum, and by the BBC, published between 1998 and 2004, named ten people whose entries were claimed to have displayed at least one error at some point in time (excluding entries only claimed to contain omissions). In 2001, BBC News qualified some of the entrants as "a little economical with the truth". Writing in The Spectator about a radio documentary on the book they did for BBC Radio 4 in 2004, Michael Crick and Martin Rosenbaum wrote that there were questions about the accuracy of the entries. They listed, amongst others, one entry that formerly claimed an incorrect alma mater. However, they wrote that they extensively used Who's Who themselves, and that any questions about the accuracy of the entries were not sufficient to actually stop them extensively using Who's Who themselves. In 2007, the reliability of Who's Who Online was praised by