a Mena contributor;<ref>Luc Rosenzweig, "Charles Enderlin et l’affaire Al Dura" , Cités, 4(44), 2010. Luc Rosenzweig, "Après Jérôme Cahuzac et Gilles Bernheim, Charles Enderlin?" , Atlantico, 20 May 2013.</ref> Richard Landes, an American historian who became involved after Enderlin showed him the raw footage during a visit to Jerusalem in 2003; and Philippe Karsenty, founder of a French media-watchdog site, Media-Ratings. It was also supported by , a French psychoanalyst, and Pierre-André Taguieff, a French philosopher who specializes in antisemitism, both of whom wrote books about the affair. Pierre-André Taguieff, La nouvelle propagande antijuive: Du symbole al-Dura aux rumeurs de Gaza, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2015. The hoax view gained further support in 2013 from a second Israeli government report, the Kuperwasser report.Michael Schwartz, Elise Labott, "New controversy over video of Gaza boy's death 13 years ago" , CNN, 21 May 2013. Several commentators regard it as a right-wing conspiracy theory and smear campaign.Ed McLoughlin, "Truth is sometimes caught in crossfire" , The Sydney Morning Herald, 6 October 2007.Larry Derfner, "On the al-Dura affair: Israel officially drank the Kool Aid" , +972 Magazine, 22 May 2013. Key issues Several commentators questioned what time the shooting occurred; what time Muhammad arrived at the hospital; why there seemed to be little blood on the ground where they were shot; and whether any bullets were collected. Several alleged that, in other scenes in the raw footage, it is clear that protesters are play acting. One physician maintained that Jamal's scars were not from bullet wounds, but dated back to an injury he sustained in the early 1990s. There was no criminal inquiry. Palestinian police allowed journalists to photograph the scene the following day, but they gathered no forensic evidence. According to a Palestinian general, there was no Palestinian investigation because there was no doubt that the Israelis had killed the boy. General Yom Tov Samia of the IDF said the presence of protesters meant the Israelis were unable to examine and take photographs of the scene. The increase in violence at the junction cut off the Nezarim settlers, so the IDF evacuated them and, a week after the shooting, blew up everything within 500 metres of the IDF outpost, thereby destroying the crime scene. A pathologist examined the boy's body, but there was no full autopsy. It is unclear whether bullets were recovered from the scene or from Jamal and Muhammad. In