rise to a number of problems and, when faced with reality "on the ground", can be seen as too artificial a construct. At the 2005 World Summit, the world's nations agreed on a "Responsibility to Protect", allowing a right for humanitarian intervention. It has been argued that this could create a flexible application of concepts of sovereignty and territorial integrity, easing the strict adherence and taking into account the de facto status of the territory and other factors present on a case by case basis. The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1674, adopted by the United Nations Security Council on April 28, 2006, "Reaffirm[ed] the provisions of paragraphs 138 and 139 of the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document regarding the responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity". However, this responsibility to protect refers only to the ability of external powers to override sovereignty and does not explicitly involve the changing of borders. The International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Kosovo's declaration of independence claims that territorial integrity is not violated as far as international law is concerned by declarations of independence in themselves. See also Breakaway states Crime of aggression Secession Self-determination 1974 Turkish invasion of Cyprus Russo-Ukrainian War Turkish occupation of northern Syria Israeli-occupied territories Falklands War Uti possidetis Indigenous rights References Further reading Sebastian Anstis and Mark Zacher (June 2010). "The Normative Bases of the Global Territorial Order." Diplomacy and Statecraft 21: 306–323. Mark Zacher (2001). "The Territorial Integrity Norm." International Organization 55: 215–250. International law