through natural selection, to solve specific problems of social interaction, rather than context-free, general-purpose mechanisms. In this case, the module is described as a specialized cheater-detection module. Evaluation of social relations hypothesis Davies et al. (1995) have argued that Cosmides and Tooby's argument in favor of context-sensitive, domain-specific reasoning mechanisms as opposed to general-purpose reasoning mechanisms is theoretically incoherent and inferentially unjustified. Von Sydow (2006) has argued that we have to distinguish deontic and descriptive conditionals, but that the logic of testing deontic conditionals is more systematic (see Beller, 2001) and depend on one's goals (see Sperber & Girotto, 2002). However, in response to Kanazawa (2010), Kaufman et al. (2011) gave 112 subjects a 70-item computerized version of the contextualized Wason card-selection task proposed by Cosmides and Tooby (1992) and found instead that "performance on non-arbitrary, evolutionarily familiar problems is more strongly related to general intelligence than performance on arbitrary, evolutionarily novel problems", and writing for Psychology Today, Kaufman concluded instead that "It seems that general intelligence is very much compatible with evolutionary psychology." See also Cognition Confirmation bias Evolution of human intelligence Logic Necessary and sufficient conditions Psychology of reasoning References Further reading External links Here is the general structure of a Wason selection task — from the Center for Evolutionary Psychology at the University of California, Santa Barbara CogLab: Wason Selection — from Wadsworth CogLab 2.0 Cognitive Psychology Online Laboratory Elementary My Dear Wason – interactive version of Wason Selection Task at PhilosophyExperiments.Com Logic puzzles Abstraction Cognition Evolutionary psychology de:Peter Wason#Selection Task