the individual is armed and dangerous. This fulfills only the second prong of Terry (the first prong—reasonable suspicion that a crime has, is, or will be committed—is fulfilled by whatever traffic violation prompted the pull-over). According to Whren v. United States, any traffic violation, no matter how small, is a legitimate basis for a traffic stop. In Heien v. North Carolina, on an 8–1 decision in December 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States expanded the reasonable suspicion factor of the Terry stop to cover a police officer's reasonable mistake of law that gives rise to "reasonable suspicion" that justifies a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment. See also Fourth Amendment Terry stop References Citations Works cited {{cite journal | first = Devon W. | last = Carbado | title = From Stop and Frisk to Shoot and Kill: Terry v. Ohio'''s Pathway to Police Violence | journal = UCLA Law Review | volume = 64 | year = 2017 | pages = 1508–52 | url = https://www.uclalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Carbado-64-6.pdf }} External links Transcript of the oral argument "A Few Blocks, 4 Years, 52,000 Police Stops"—The New York Times'', July 11, 2010 1968 in Ohio 1968 in United States case law 20th-century American trials American Civil Liberties Union litigation History of Cleveland Search and seizure case law United States Fourth Amendment case law United States privacy case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court United States Supreme Court cases Cleveland Division of Police