for the departmental elections) as there are seats to be allocated, whereas in other countries "incomplete" lists are allowed, which is not a problem under a panachage system. Apportionment of party seats Many variations on seat allocation within party-list proportional representation exist. The two most common types are: The highest averages method (or divisor method), including the D'Hondt method (Jefferson method) is used in Armenia, Austria, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Croatia, Estonia, Finland, Poland, and Spain; and the Sainte-Laguë method (Webster method) is used in Indonesia, New Zealand, Norway, and Sweden. The largest remainder (LR) methods, including the Hamilton method. Different apportionment formulas may favour smaller or larger parties: D'Hondt method (slightly favours larger parties) Adams' method (greatly favours very small parties) Webster/Sainte-Laguë method Macanese d'Hondt method (greatly favours smaller parties) Huntington–Hill method (slightly favours small parties) Hamilton method Imperiali method (greatly disfavours very small parties, not strictly proportional) LR-Hare (slightly favours very small parties when unmodified, if there is no electoral threshold) LR-Droop (very slightly favours larger parties) LR-Hagenbach-Bischoff (slightly favours larger parties) LR-Imperiali (greatly favours larger parties) While the allocation formula is important, equally important is the district magnitude (number of seats in a constituency). The higher the district magnitude, the more proportional an electoral system becomes - the most proportional being when there is no division into constituencies at all and the entire country is treated as a single constituency. More, in some countries the electoral system works on two levels: at-large for parties, and in constituencies for candidates, with local party-lists seen as fractions of general, national lists. In this case, magnitude of local constituencies is irrelevant, seat apportionment being calculated at national level. List proportional representation may also be combined with other apportionment methods (most commonly majoritarian) in various mixed systems, e.g., using the additional member system. Example Below it can be seen how different apportionment methods yield different results with the same number of seats and votes (100 and 2832 in this example). As there are 100 seats, the percentage values for every party's share of the vote is equal to the party's vote count divided by the Hare quota (which is the ratio of vote and seat totals), and in this case the share of seats under the largest remainder method using this quota happens to be the same as the percentage values rounded to the nearest integer (because exactly 3 party's results has