demographics of the population being studied, and the instruction technique used to teach the method, have significant effects on its failure rate. The Pearl Index has unique shortcomings, however. It assumes a constant failure rate over time. That is an incorrect assumption for two reasons: first, the most fertile couples will get pregnant first. Couples remaining later in the study are, on average, of lower fertility. Second, most birth control methods have better effectiveness in more experienced users. The longer a couple is in the study, the better they are at using the method. So the longer the study length, the lower the Pearl Index will be – and comparisons of Pearl Indexes from studies of different lengths cannot be accurate. The Pearl Index also provides no information on factors other than accidental pregnancy which may influence effectiveness calculations, such as: dissatisfaction with the method trying to achieve pregnancy medical side effects being lost to follow-up A common misperception is that the highest possible Pearl Index is 100 – i.e. 100% of women in the study conceive in the first year. However, if all the women in the study conceived in the first month, the study would yield a Pearl Index of 1200 or 1300. The Pearl Index is only accurate as a statistical estimation of per-year risk of pregnancy if the pregnancy rate in the study was very low. In 1966, two birth control statisticians advocated abandonment of the Pearl Index: See also Comparison of birth control methods Decrement table Life table Footnotes Birth control Methods of birth control Clinical research