He was recognized with the University's Distinguished Alumnus Award in 2002 and serves as a member on the Pepperdine Law School Board of Visitors. In 2005, Boucher was honored with an Honorary Doctor of Law by Whittier College School of Law in Costa Mesa, California. Career Gould & Sayre, Santa Monica, California, Associate (1984 to 1985) Sayre, Moreno, Purcell & Boucher, Los Angeles, California, Managing Partner (1985 to 1990) Nordstrom, Steele, Nicolette & Jefferson, Los Angeles, California, Attorney of Counsel (1993 to 1996) The Law Offices of Raymond Boucher, Tarzana, California, Partner (1990 to 1999) Kiesel, Boucher & Larson LLP, Beverly Hills, California, Partner (1999 to 2013) Khorrami Boucher Sumner Sanguinetti, LLP, Los Angeles, California, Partner (2013–2014) Boucher, LLP, Woodland Hills, California, Partner (2014–Present) He has been recognized as a Top Leading Lawyer in America by Lawdragon and named Trial Lawyer of the Decade by the Los Angeles Daily Journal. Notable published case decisions Mr. Carrey was sued by ex girlfriend husband and Mother. Mr Boucher was able to dismiss charges. 2018 Callahan v. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP (2011) 194 Cal. App. 4th 557. Represented family members in suit against law firm that drafted a partnership agreement which damaged the family business. Pending. Harrell v. 20th Century Ins. Co., 934 F.2d 203 (9th Cir. 1991). Suit to recover for fraud in the sale of a small business. Resolved. Ileto v. Glock, Inc., 421 F. Supp. 2d 127 (C.D. Cal. 2006). Action against weapons manufacturers Glock and China North, whose firearms were used by a member of the Aryan Nation to shoot several children and kill a postal worker. Pending. Quesada v. Herb Thyme Farms, Inc. __ Cal. __ (2015) California Supreme Court determines state law claims brought by consumers alleging produce is being intentionally mislabeled as organic are not preempted by federal law. Ramirez v. Fox Television Station, 998 F.2d 743 (9th Cir. 1993). Suit involving unconstitutional employment discrimination based upon national origin. Regents of University of California v. Superior Court (2010) 183 Cal. App. 4th 755. Represented relatives of decedents who willed their bodies to a medical school for research and teaching purposes, and who learned that UCLA improperly disposed of the decedents’ remains in a grotesque and undignified manner after scientific uses were concluded. Donors were told that after use, their remains would be cremated and scattered in a rose garden. Human remains were commingled with other