patients treated with ALK inhibitors trended to have longer response times. Another retrospective study evaluated the response of 17 patients (aged 22–46 years; median age 32 years) with advanced disease to Adriamycin-based chemotherapy regimens, i.e. Adriamycin alone, Adriamycin + Ifosfamide, or Adriamicin + other chemotherapy drugs. No patients had a complete response, 8 patients had partial responses, 4 patients had steady disease, and 5 patients had progressive disease. Progression-free survival and overall survival times for the group were 6.6 and 21.2 months, respectively. The study also evaluated 9 patients (aged 12–31 years, median age 16) treated with methotrexate + vinblastine, methotrexate + vinorelbine, or vinblastine + vinorelbine; 2 patients attained complete responses, 3 attained partial responses, 2 had steady disease, and 2 had progressive disease; this groups' progression-free time was not reached while its overall survival time was 83.4 months. The study concluded that the Adriamycin-based and methotrexate/vinblastine/vinorelbine regimens have a high degree of activity in IMT. Due to the low numbers of patients evaluated, no conclusions could be made on which regimen(s) were most effective. In addition to the report that compared the effect of ALK-inhibitors to other therapy regimens detailed in the previous paragraph, several reports have focused primarily on small numbers of IMT patients treated with an ALK inhibitor. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer evaluated the effect of the ALK-inhibitor, crizotinib, on 12 ALK-positive IMT adults who had persistent and/or metastatic disease following surgical and/or drug treatment: 2 patients had complete responses, 4 had partial responses, 5 had steady disease, and none had progressive disease; 9 of these patients had at least 1 year of progression-free survival but one patient died of the disease. A review of previously published IMT patients of all ages found that: 1) 4 patients (3 with unifocal, 1 with multifocal disease) without prior treatment had complete responses to crizotinin; 2) 2 patients (1 with unifocal, 1 with multifocal disease) that had persistent disease after surgery and previously treated with chemotherapy had partial responses to crizotinib while 1 patient previously treated with a corticosteroid, prednisone, continued to have progressive disease on crizotinib; and 3) 6 patients with progressive disease after surgery (due to multifocal or unifocal disease in inaccessible sites) had complete responses (2 cases), partial responses (2 cases), stable disease (1 case), or progressive disease (1 case) in response to crizotinib. Two of these crizotinib-treated patients with progressive