a presidential impeachment. He served out the typical single five-year term with his presidential term concluding in 2022. President Moon and his government has been widely described as left-wing or liberal by media. Domestic policy Chaebol reform South Korea's economic growth has been attributed in large part to Chaebols, or family-owned conglomerates. Prominent examples of conglomerates include Samsung and Hyundai, concentrated power (collusion), connections with the government including most recently the 2016 Choi Soon-sil scandal which ultimately led to the special election Moon won. Moon subsequently appointed "chaebol sniper" Kim Sang-jo, a well-known shareholder activist, to the role of fair-trade commissioner aimed at reforming chaebols. Tech policy As President, Moon signed into law an amendment to the Telecommunications Business Act that has been referred to as the "Anti-Google Law". The legislation prohibits Apple and Google, which operate the App Store and Google Play Store, respectively, from requiring app developers on these platforms to use their payment systems to sell their products. As a result, app developers will be able to avoid paying commission to Apple or Google by directing customers to pay through alternate platforms. Health care policy Moon's health care policy included the benefit coverage expansion in National Health Insurance. Prosecution reform Prosecution reform was implemented to rearrange the prosecution and its investigation right and to rebuild the corrupt prosecution. So far, the prosecution have had both investigation right ,and accusation right and it leads to the absolute power. So, the main purpose of coordinating the prosecution and police investigation rights is to weaken the accusation right of the prosecution. It was started under the Moon Jae-in administration by former Ministers of Justice such as Cho Guk, Choo Mi-ae, and Park Beom-gye. Yoon Seok-yeol, who is currently serving as president, also participated as former Prosecutor General. As part of the process, the Corruption Investigation Office for high-ranking officials was established, and the backlash from the prosecution was very strong. Against this ‘power rearrange’ process, some executives of prosecution withdrew their seats as a sign of resistance. In addition, through coordinating the prosecution and police investigation rights, the ruling party tried to shift the power of the prosecution to others. Like the time the Corruption Investigation Office For High-ranking Officials was established, high-ranking officials of the prosecution again resigned as a sign of resistance against coordinating the prosecution and police investigation rights. As a result, the power of the prosecution