in LIS research. A 2010 study revealed that professionals experienced evidence-based practice as, variously, irrelevant; learning from published research; service improvement; a way of being; and as a weapon. See also Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (journal) Evidence-based practices Meta-analysis Systematic review References Further reading Booth, A. & Brice, A. (Eds.) (2004). Evidence-Based Practice for Information Professionals: A Handbook. London: Facet Publishing. Burrows, S.C. & Tylman, V. (1999). Evaluating medical student searches of MEDLINE for evidence-based information: process and application of results. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 87(4), pp. 471–476. Dalrymple, Prudence W. (2010) Evidence-Based Practice, Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, Third Edition, Vol. III, 1790-1796. Eldredge J.D. (2000). Evidence-based librarianship: an overview. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 88(4), pp. 289–302. Eldredge J. (2002). Cohort studies in health sciences librarianship. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90(4), pp. 380–392. Kloda, LA; Koufogiannakis, D. & Mallan, K. (2011). Transferring evidence into practice: what evidence summaries of library and information studies research tell practitioners. Information Research, 2011, V 16, N1 (MAR), Article Number: 465. Lewis, S. (2011). Evidence based library and information practice in Australia: defining skills and knowledge. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 2011, V 28, N2 (JUN), pp. 152–155. Urquhart, C. (2010). Systematic reviewing, meta-analysis and meta-synthesis for evidence-based library and information science. Information Research, 15(3,S), Article Number: colis708. Library science Information science Evidence-based practices