one try to stop the Nazi killing machine, or hardly anyone, out of the millions of Germans who lived at the time - many of whom undoubtedly supported the regime? This is, of course, the issue of guilt and responsibility: at what point does a witness become complicit in what he or she witnesses; and at what point does one become a perpetrator? These are tricky questions. Some of the interviewees are quite aware that they may be considered complicit in the crimes of the Third Reich, or even direct perpetrators. One in particular expresses profound shame. Others are more ambivalent. One interviewee cuts the interview short when the issue of his guilt is raised in a specific manner, as if he was aware of the risk of prosecution for war crimes... A couple are in complete denial: on the contrary, they are still "proud" to have served the Fatherland and to have been part of an elite military unit, the SS. We hear the familiar denials, to the effect that many of the witnesses argue that they did not know what was going on (especially, in the extermination camps) and, of course, they did not take part. But it turns out many of them were involved, directly or not, like the bookkeeper who is interviewed. It is clear that most of the interviewees, apart from the few who are in complete denial, know, deep down, that they will carry the guilt and shame for what happened under the Nazis to their grave. As one interviewee puts it, he would not be a "perpetrator" if he had said "no", but he never said "no": like other people, he "went along" with what was going on. What is unusual is that Luke Holland managed to make a film about the Third Reich and the Holocaust as seen through German eyes, as he succeeded in getting elderly Germans to talk about what they saw and what they did at the time. There are some truly chilling moments, such as the scene in school, today, where you realize that some young Germans do not understand at all what happened under Nazism: one young German is even prepared to berate a former SS camp guard who has come to his school to testify, as the youngster argues that the elderly man cannot possibly feel "ashamed" of what was done in his name under the