significant objects from foreign countries." However, the changes made by the bill would not provide any immunity to art or objects that were "taken in violation of international law by Nazi Germany between January 30, 1933 and May 8, 1945." In an editorial, Tess Davis of the University of Glasgow and Marc Masurovsky of the Holocaust Art Restitution Project, spoke out in opposition to the bill. Davis and Masurovsky argue that the bill would "prevent claimants from recovering their rightful property" and enable museums to "knowingly be able to exhibit stolen and looted art and antiquities." Davis and Masurovsky argue that the bill would weaken U.S. law and undermine the American tradition of honoring property rights. See also List of bills in the 113th United States Congress Looted art Art theft References External links Library of Congress - Thomas H.R. 4292 beta.congress.gov H.R. 4292 GovTrack.us H.R. 4292 OpenCongress.org H.R. 4292 WashingtonWatch.com H.R. 4292 House Republicans' legislative digest on H.R. 4292 Proposed legislation of the 113th United States Congress Art and cultural repatriation Art crime