involving NemID. The insurance agency Topdanmark demanded an explanation from IBM, which they used for IT services. Aller Media initiated an external investigation led by the lawyer Henrik Stagetorn and PwC employee Mikkel Sthyr. The results were initially expected within a few weeks. However, the impartiality and extent of the investigation was quickly criticised. Aller Fonden owned over 50% of the shares in Aller Holding A/S; the director of the former, law professor Linda Nielsen, chose to resign as she did not believe the investigation was sufficiently thorough. The investigation was weakened by the non-cooperation of several of the involved parties, including the former Se og Hør journalist Kasper Kopping. The leaks of information to Se og Hør from SAS and Copenhagen Airport led to transport minister Magnus Heunicke ordering an investigation by the Danish Transport Authority. Reaction of the parliament Several members of the Folketing officially asked questions regarding the case. Amongst others, in May 2014 Enhedslisten's Pernille Skipper asked the Folketing's Retsudvalg whether PET had received tip-offs in connection with the surveillance. PET's answer via the Ministry of Justice confirmed that tip-offs had been received as early as November 2011 stating that "Se og Hør apparently have access to certain information about celebrities' flights and credit card usage". The then Justice Minister Karen Hækkerup commented that it was "a damn shame" that PET had dropped investigation into the case. The Se og Hør case and various other incidences of problematic personal data protection led to the Folketing's Retsudvalg and Kulturudvalg requiring the government to accept extra binding security responsibilities in June 2014. This caused the creation of two working groups to, amongst other activities, investigate the possible need for an IT minister. Charges and sentences The law professional Oluf Jørgensen commented that based on the details published in the media immediately after the breaking of the scandal, he believed that legal "aggravating circumstances" were at play in the case. Frans Mortensen, another legal expert, was in agreement and specifically thought it probable the Danish Penal Code's paragraph 263 would apply. This allows for up to 6 years of imprisonment. This was significant because unless aggravating circumstances could be proven, it would be impossible to prosecute Se og Hørs former chief editor Henrik Qvortrup; having left the magazine in 2008, he was protected by the statute of limitations in the event that he had been sufficiently involved to draw