holding, most notably in United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876). However, since the early 20th century, the Supreme Court has used the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which was interpreted to have the same meaning as the Fifth Amendment, to apply most of the Bill of Rights to the states by selective incorporation. Therefore, as to most of the Bill of Rights, Barron and its progeny have been circumvented, if not actually overruled. References General references Jean Edward Smith, John Marshall: Definer Of A Nation, New York: Henry Holt & Company, 1996. Edward C. Papenfuse, Outline, Notes and Documents Concerning Barron v Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243, http://mdhistory.net/msaref06/barron/html/index.html External links Original Maryland lower court documents with outline courtesy of the Maryland State Archives, http://mdsa.net 1833 in United States case law History of Baltimore Incorporation case law Takings Clause case law 1833 in Maryland United States Supreme Court cases of the Marshall Court United States Supreme Court cases