27, voters will be able to subject any legislative redistricting plan that the California State Legislature proposes to the veto referendum process is misleading, because voters can already do that: "Voters can ALREADY reject legislative redistricting plans through the referendum process, regardless of Prop. 27." The idea put forward by Proposition 27 supporters that members of the California Citizens Redistricting Commission will be able to personally enrich themselves through their service on the board is "mislead[ing]" and "ridiculous": "The voter-approved citizens commission ONLY DRAWS MAPS ONCE EVERY TEN YEARS and commissioners make only a modest stipend per day when they work. That’s why taxpayer and good government groups support the Commission and oppose 27." Donors against There is no committee directly opposing Proposition 27. However, there is a committee called "Yes on 20, No on 27--Hold Politicians Accountable, A Coalition of Taxpayers, Seniors, Good Government Groups, Small Business and Community Organizers" whose aim is to pass Proposition 20, a competing ballot measure, and defeat Proposition 27. Because Proposition 27 contains "poison pill" language countering Proposition 27, any money spent to promote a "Yes" vote on Proposition 20 might be considered money spent to oppose Proposition 27, and vice versa. Charles T. Munger Jr. and his wife Charlotte Lowell are the primary driving force behind Proposition 20 and are its primary funder. Charles T. Munger Jr. is the son of Charles T. Munger Sr., a Vice-President at Berkshire Hathaway. Donors of $20,000 and over to "Yes on 20, No on 27" through October 21 are listed below. The table shows ... the name of the individual or organization, the affiliation to another organization, the amount of money contributed to "Yes on 20, No on 27", whether the donor address is within California. (Updated October 21, 2010) All major donors to "Yes on 20, No on 27" are from California, unlike the donors supporting Proposition 27. Editorial opinion Yes on Prop 27 Newspapers that have editorialized in favor of Proposition 27 include: San Francisco Bay Guardian: "This measure abolishes that panel and would allow the Legislature to draw new lines for both state and federal offices after the 2010 census. We don't love having the Legislature handle that task — but we like the existing, unaccountable, unrepresentative agency even less." No on Prop 27 Newspapers that have editorialized against Proposition 27 include: San Bernardino Sun: "Proposition 27 is not drawing as much