Siemens SCALANCE W1750D
The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE. (ATLWL-266) A buffer overflow vulnerability in an underlying service could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI UDP port (8211). (ATLWL-253) A buffer overflow vulnerability in an underlying service could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI UDP port (8211). (ATLWL-254) A buffer overflow vulnerability in an underlying service could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI UDP port (8211). (ATLWL-299) A buffer overflow vulnerability in an underlying service could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI UDP port (8211). (ATLWL-300) A buffer overflow vulnerability in an underlying service could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI UDP port (8211). (ATLWL-302) An unauthenticated buffer overflow vulnerability exists within the web management interface. Successful exploitation results in the execution of arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. (ATLWL-102) An unauthenticated buffer overflow vulnerability exists within the web management interface. Successful exploitation results in the execution of arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. (ATLWL-268) A vulnerability in the web management interface could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in a victim’s browser in the context of the affected interface. (ATLWL-168) An authenticated command injection vulnerability exists in the command line interface. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. (ATLWL-97) An unauthenticated denial of service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the handling of certain SSID strings. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to interrupt the normal operation of the affected Access Point. (ATLWL-242) An authenticated denial of service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the web management interface. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability results in the ability to interrupt the normal operation of the affected Access Point. (ATLWL-248) A vulnerability in the web management interface could allow a remote attacker to conduct a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in a victim’s browser in the context of the affected interface. (ATLWL-234)