diff --git a/data/part_1/0004656457.json b/data/part_1/0004656457.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..613f35dd6c3298c9ef1d95139c7b974036426e53 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0004656457.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"c833ca609ebf4e36e7e7fd63aabc8ed1","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e4f439b0-3257-4d31-8bc0-8283078d3641/retrieve","id":"348760208"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"63886302-94cd-4d63-9549-cf05eeaf769e","pagecount":"122","content":"Research to Nourish Africa Internalionallnstitute of Tropical Agrirulture I Institul international d'agriaJlture tropicale Preface IITA's research-for-development agenda is divided into six project themes (Annex 1), around which these project annual reports are prepared_ These project themes address different aspects of attaining sustainable increases in productivity of dominant farming systems and utilization practices in the various agroecologies of sub-Saharan Mrica (SSA)_ Research and training activities carried out in the six projects are being implemented together with national program partners in order to increase the well-being of resource-poor people in SSA through higher levels of food production, better income, and nutritional status, and reduced drudgery particularly for women_The project logframe is presented in Annex 2.Highlights from all projects are in Annex 3 which thus provides an illustrative overview of IITA's research activities and achievements for the year.Annex 4 shows the agroecological zones of sub-Saharan Mrica in which UTA conducts J'esearch_The targeted cropping and land use systems in this project generally only make up part of the portfolio of farming activities of rural households in the humid and subhumid zone of West and Central Mrica. Willingness oHarmers to take up innovations will also depend on the relative allocation of resources to these other activities. This project will evaluate opportunities and innovations based on the overall conditions encountered by the farmers.Particularly in the humid zone, agriculture and forest managementfconservation inter• face. This can lead to conflicts between different stakeholders. Furthermore, land with specific characteristics is often allocated preferentially to specific cropping systems. This requires a spatial understanding of household and community decisions on resource use. This project will interface across disciplines and institutions to identify alternative land use opportunities also at a spatial level.Integration of innovations by farming households is a social process. Technology development alone is not adequate to ensure adoption beyond the test sites. This project will endeavour to include the social component as an integral part of its approach.The policy and institutional environment (e.g., related to markets, credits, and input supply) can influence the uptake of innovations by farmers and rural communities. At the same time, feedback needs to be provided to policymakers on options. This project will take these factors into consideration as it develops strategies and will also relay its findings to policy makers at different levels. Plantains are the most important commercial food crop in southern Cameroon and elsewhere in the humid forest ecologies of sub• Saharan Mrica. They are planted after forest clearing, thus drawing on natural resources. Plantains have a high demand for N, K, and P and it was shown that P and K application increased yields even when planted after long forest fallow. Yields are depressed through plant losses caused by the burrowing nematode Radopholus similis. Farmers are not aware of the symptoms and consequences of nematode infection and have no means to clean planting material. Most plantations are established from suckers cut from existing plantations, bearing a high risk of initial infection. There may be an interaction between soil fertility (in terms of nutrient supply) and nematode infestation, such that infested plants need higher nutrient levels to acquire sufficient nutrients to produce a crop. The latter may be one reason for farmers not to plant plantains in young fallows or land already used for several cycles.In the degraded land none of the measures increased bunch yield to the lowest level attained in the forest land (Table 3). Thus additional factors need to be considered in any further attempt to profitably produce plantains in short fallow land. Hot-water treated 4.878 8.028 < 0.001 Traditional 3.114 3.174 it is expected that the demand for plantain will increase in the future.Smallholder farmers who can use this demand to generate income face the problem of a high proportion of plantains failing to produce because of early toppling and pseudostem break in the dry season, due to Radopholus similis infestation. Farmers in southern Cameroon are not aware of the presence of the nematode, nor of measures against it.The traditional way of planting plantain does not include any measures to remove nematode•infested tissue from suckers. However, there are several methods to clean suckers from nematodes. One of them, hot-water treatment, has been shown to be efficient. However, in the rural setting of southern Cameroonian farmers, hot-water treatment is apparently too complicated and too expensive (capital investment). Alternatively, paring has been suggested to remove infested tissue. Tests on -station could not confirm any nematode reducing effect or improved plant growth. Consequently, paring, which is a rather time-consuming procedure, might not be required if other cleaning methods are used. Here, the proven hot-water method, along with locally used and simplified methods were tested on pared and non-pared suckers to establish whether paring is required to obtain clean planting material and if alternative treatments can be effective without paring suckers. In an earlier experiment, the application of fertilizer caused positive yield responses, particularly when suckers were hot-water treated_ Therefore, the response to N, P, K, fertilizer application, after cleaning suckers with different methods, was tested_The experiment was established in a farmer's field on land previously under forest fallow for about 18 years, at Nkolmetet (11 0 x 45' E, 3 0 25' N) in southern Cameroon. The forest was cleared manually using cutlasses and a chain saw. The slash was retained, not burned. The design was a three factorial (2 x 5 x 2) complete randomized block design with four replicates. The experiment was positioned on a gentle slope with blocks arranged along the slope. Plots contained 16 plants at 2.5 x 2.25 m distance on a rectangular configuration, resulting in a space allocation of 5.625 m 2 plant•! and 1778 plants ha-!.First factor was sucker preparation at two levels: suckers pared versus suckers prepared in the traditional manner. Second factor was sucker treatment at 5 levels: (1) no treatment, i.e., control (2) nematicide application into the planting hole, (3) rolling of the sucker in wood ash, (4) hot-water treatment, and (5) boiling-water treatment. Third factor was fertilizer application at two levels: 120 kg N ha-! as urea in 4 dressings of 30 kg ha-! plus 180 kg K ha-! as potassium sulfate in three dressings of 60 kg ha-! and 40 kg P ha-! as triple super phosphate in a single dressing versus no fertilizer application.Traditional sucker preparation involves the removal of the lower half ofthe corm to control for the presence of banana weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus) galleries, if none are found the sucker is planted as is. If galleries are found the black tissue is removed. This method does not look for weevils that have penetrated the corm through the base of the petioles. Furthermore, black tissue and rotten tissue are only roughly removed, yet not until all remaining corm material is purely white and free of discolored tissue. Nematicide (carbofuran), was applied at 2.0 g active incredient per planting hole around the sucker before refilling planting hole with soil. Rolling of suckers in wood ash was a suggestion made by farmers during a survey on plantain planting methods in southern Cameroon. Wood ash is readily available as all rural households use firewood for cooking. Furthermore wood ash contains Ca, Mg, K, and P. When dissolved it increases the pH and might thus have a biocidal effect. Hot-water treatment was conducted in a hot-water tank by submerging suckers in 52 °C hot water for 20 minutes. Boiling-water treatment was conducted in a used oil drum suspended over a fire. Suckers were submerged in boiling water for 30 seconds.Plantain suckers were obtained locally and separated into four size classes, to be planted in the four blocks. Within size classes suckers were randomly separated into batches of 16. Thereafter the suckers were treated and the treated suckers of each plot were weighed. Planting holes of approximately 20 x 20 x 20 em were dug and suckers were planted from 2 to 7 April 1999.Mean sucker weight per plot at planting was higher after traditional preparation (910 g) than after paring (801 g, P = 0.032). Sucker weights were not different between any other treatments (Table 4). The reduction of sucker weight through paring is inevitable as the corms' outer layer is completely removed. By the traditional preparation, more tissue is retained because the method is less stringent in the removal of discolored tissue. The mean sucker weight was used as a covariate when appropriate.selected and cut to 10 em length, then cut longitudinally to expose corticle and steele. If plants were uprooted, excavation and count of roots was not possible. In such cases five roots were randomly selected from the exposed corm. Nematode•damaged tissue is dark purple to black as compared to the unaffected white corticle tissue. A \"root nematode index\" (RNI) was derived as: RNI = (surface of necrotic cortical tissue/total surface of cortical tissue) x 100%To consider both the number ofliving roots and the level of nematode damage a \"non-damaged roots index\" (NDRI) was calculated as: NDRI = number of living roots x (100 -RNI) Harvested plants were cut at ground level. The largest sucker was retained to grow the ratoon, all other suckers were cut off. Bunch harvest was terminated at the end of May 2002, 45 months after planting.The plantain establishment rate at 10 WAP was neither correlated to the mean sucker weight per plot nor to the mean mulch layer height per plot. Establishment was higher from traditionally prepared suckers (96.7%) than from pared suckers (86.7%, P = 0.0001). Treatments following traditional preparation had no effect on establishment rates. However, after paring, boiling water treatment reduced establishment compared to all other treatments and nematicide application had a lower establishment than ash-coating (Table 5).In all treatments but the pared boiling water treatment, the proportion of surviving plants further dropped until 30 WAP (Table 6). Plant losses in the pared treatment were 14_5 %, resulting in significantly lower survival than in the non-pared treatments (85.5 versus 94.1 %, P = 0.0001)_ Paring interacted significantly with following treatments, such that in boiling water treatment and nematicide application paring caused significant reductions in survival, yet not in the other treatments. At 10, 20, and 30 WAP, pared plants had significantly less leaves than traditionally prepared plants (Table 7). All other factors and interactions were insignificant. At 10 W AP, living leaf number was weakly positively correlated to mean initial sucker weight at planting: Number ofleaves = 1.4 x sucker weight (kg) + 3.36; r2 = 0.174, P = 0.0001, n = 80. Paring had no effect on the number of standing leaves (1.13 versus 1.11 in pared), the height (228 cm versus 218 cm in pared) and circumference (40.6 cm versus 38.5 cm in pared) of plants at harvest or when reported fallen. Neither the number of living roots nor that of dead roots was affected by paring. The root necrosis index (RNI) was significantly lower for pared plants, yet not the non.damaged root index (NDRI) (Table 8).Effects on the numbers ofliving roots of treatments following paring or traditional preparation failed the 0.05 significance level, yet at P < 0.07 the control (7.1) and ash coating (8.6) had lower living root numbers than nematicide application (10.4) hot-water treatment (10.7), and boiling water treatment (11.8). The RNI and NDRI were highly significantly affected by treatments (Table 9). Paring suckers before further treatment against nematodes and weevils had no positive effect on the proportion of plants that produced a bunch (37.8% nonpared versus 37.0% pared, p = 0.86), the bunch mass per plant that produced (5.257 kg nonpared versus 5.915 kg pared, p = 0.34), and the fresh bunch yield (7.306 Mg ha• l nonpared versus 7.363 Mg ha• l pared, p = 0.96).Treatments following paring or traditional preparation had effects on both bunch mass and yield. Bunch mass per plant that produced was highest after boiling water treatment, followed by nematicide application and hot• water treatment (Table 10).Table 10. Bunch mass (kg) per plant that produced a bunch and fresh bunch yield (Mg ha• l ) of plantain, after different treatments against nematodes. As the effect of paring was negative when followed by thermal treatment, the analysis was run with the nonpared plots only. The proportion of plants that produced an edible bunch was significantly higher after boiling water treatment than after control, ash coating, and nematicide application (Table ll). There were no differences between the other treatments.Table 11. Proportion of plants that produced an edible bunch, bunch mass per plant that produced, and bunch yield of traditionally prepared plantain following different treatments against nematodes.-~--.------- The time-consuming paring does not appear necessary, especially if a thermal cleaning method can be used. Although boiling water treatment did not out yield the hot-water treatment, its advantage of low capital investment, mobility, and speed of treatment, make it a more likely adoptable option than hot-water treatment.Further investigations specifically to test interactions with mulching or other nutrient application (fertilizer) may allow further yield increases.byS.H.To establish the effect of existing plant parasitic nematode populations in the sites of a planned experiment on the performance of local plantain and UTA hybrid in different fallow ages and under different agronomic systems, the soil was sampled at establishment of cover and other intercrops.Nematodes were extracted directly form the sampled soil. About 4 kg of the soil were weighed into 15 I buckets and tissue culture banana plants planted. At 3 months after planting (!I{AP), the bananas were removed and the number of leaves, the leaf area, shoot dry weight, root number, and root fresh weight were determined. The roots were mixed in a blender and nematodes were extracted. At 3 MAP, a soil sample was taken from every bucket and nematodes extracted from the soil.Radopholus similis and Pratylenchus spp. were neither found in the soil before planting, nor in the banana roots or the soil at 3 months after planting bananas. The most common nematode was a Helicotylenchus sp. which was more abundant in young Chromolaena odorata dominated fallow (261 100 em') than in forest fallow (18 100 em\"). Meloidogyne spp. were more abundant in forest soil (60 100 em\") than in young fallow soil (9 100 cm•').Hoplolaimus spp. occurred in a few samples and at very low densities. The Helicotylenchus sp. densities increased very rapidly in the banana roots in short fallow land (24 0911100 g roots) compared to forestland (432/100 g roots).A similar yet not as pronounced increase was found in the rhizosphere of short fallow soil (654 100 em\") versus forest soil (24 100 cm•,).by S.H.In two experiments testing the effects of boiling water treatment on plantain suckers, samples of roots attached to the sucker and corm surface material were taken before and after submerging the suckers in boiling water for 30 seconds.The level of infestation before treatment was surprisingly low. Mter treatment of 24 sets of suckers one apparently live specimen of R. similis was found. The sample originated from a set of suckers which had rather a lot of hard soil attached, and it might have been that the heat did not penetrate fast enough into the soil. Thus, suckers should be cleaned of soil and root stumps should be cut off before treatment. This remains an ongoing activity to establish the geographical distribution of nematodes on Musa in Nigeria, and how this relates to previous studies. In neighboring countries, a shift in the community structure of nematode populations on Musa has shown Pratylenchus correae to gradually become more prevalent than previously, resulting in more damage to plantain by this species.In Nigeria, results to date indicate that P. cotteae is present but with a relatively low prevalence in comparison to Helicotylenchus multicinctus, which is the most prevalent and occurs in greatest densities. The species currently identified as the most common occurring on Musa are P. corteae, H. multicinctus, Meloidogyne spp., Radopholus similis, and Hoplolaimus pararobustus. A field experiment was laid down at Ibadan, Nigeria, to study the differential pathogenicity of the plant parasitic nematodes Pratylenchus coffeae, Helicotylenchus multicinctus, Meloidogyne spp., Radopholus smiles, and Hoplolaimus pararobustus, which were inoculated separately onto plots of plantain cv. Agbagba.Data on the mother crops have largely been lost due to storm damage. Results of the first ratoon are awaited. Experiments under screenhouse conditions in pots are being established in 2003 to compare with and support results from the field.Evaluation ofthe comparative efficiency of Tithonia diversifolia mulch for pest management and improved Musa production by D. Co., S.H., and A. T.Use of Tithonia diversifolia as a mulch, as low as 2 tha\" dry weight on Musa in pots resulted in a significant increase in crop growth on nematode-infected planting material over a 4-month period. Mulching with T_ diversifolia over a 4-month period however, did not affect nematode populations of Helicotylenchus multicinctus in Nigeria, or Radopholus simi lis in Uganda.A field trial was established in 2002 to observe the effects of T_ diversifolia mulch on plantain and nematode pests in Ibadan, Nigeria, over a series of crop cycles. On-farm demonstration plots are due to be established in 2003 to promote the use of clean planting material in combination with mulch, for improved nematode management and increased production.Developing germplasm adapted to key pest and disease constraints, while preserving market preferences 1. New selections were made in 2002 from early evaluation trials (EET) established in 2000 or 2001 at Onne, consisting of four diploid x diploid-derived hybrids, one diploid x tetraploid-derived hybrid, and nine tetraploid x diploid-derived hybrids (Table 12)_ These are under propagation for clonal evaluation from 2003 onwards.Three new EETs were established at Onne in 2002 with focus on selecting for resistance to nematodes among families derived from crosses involving 'Morong princesa' and 'Pisang lilin' as sources of resistance and primary diploid or tetraploid hybrids previously selected for their excellent agronomic characteristics as well as resistance to black Sigatoka. On•farm demonstration plots (OFDP) were established in the form of varietal mixture trials (VMT) at 62 georeferenced sites in collaboration with farmers and extension agencies across the Nigerian plantain belt (Fig. 1).Three tetraploid hybrids (PITA 14,PITA 17,and BITA 3) were planted in alternation with the popular landrace \"Agbagba\", following a checkerboard layout. Preliminary data show that disease pressure on the landrace is reduced, resulting in higher yields of the landrace in addition to the good performance of the hybrids.Baseline data collection has been carried out to provide indicators against which to measure progress imparted by the project. Similarly, data on crop performance at and beyond farm gate are being collected at all 62 contact test locations. Such data from a small number of contact farmers (10 out of 62) show that the adoption potential of the new hybrids is very high.On the average, each farmer harvested 21.3 bunches of the improved hybrids compared to 10.7 bunches for the landrace, owing to the faster growth of the improved hybrids. In terms of food quality. the surveyed farmers reported that the new hybrids met their preference criteria. Interestingly, not all the harvested bunches were consumed at the farm gate: an average 69% of the harvest was sold for the hybrids, understandably less than the 82% for the landrace.Also. the hybrids attracted lower prices per bunch compared to the hybrids, which was expected because the latter was more known to buyers than the former. However, farmers derived more cash income from the hybrids (N3873.33) than from the landrace (N2517.67). as a result of the larger number of bunches produced by the hybrids compared to the land• race. These results are detailed in Table 13.Furthermore, additional income was generated from the sale of suckers to other farmers. Of much significance is the relatively large number of suckers that were sold to each pur• chaser, despite the relatively high cost of the suckers.This may be interpreted as an indication of the high appeal exerted to noncontact farmers by the new hybrids, are good prospects for expansion of areas cultivated with the improved varieties. It appears that besides disease resistance, earliness and faster cycling constitute most attractive features of the new varieties.The performance of the hybrids has generated a lot of interest among the farmers in the region, and this has resulted into pressure on UTA and collaborating State ADPs as well as contact farmers for the hybrid planting materials. Therefore, to ensure that the hybrid dissemination process continues indefinitely, efforts are underway to establish six regional plantain training schools (RPTS) at nodal locations across the Nigerian plantain belt. It is therefore important that we vigorously pursue the completion of the RPTS that will carry the triple mission of (1) providing planting materials through rapid multiplication techniques acquired from UTA. ( 2) training of farmer groups in such techniques to foster the development of community nurseries, and ( 3) training in postharvest processing options that reduce wastage, extend shelf life, and add value to the fruits for increased income generation.Meanwhile, 10 selected personnel from the RPTS host agencies were subjected to intensive training in efficient vegetative propagation methods as well as nursery management techniques both at the UTA station at Onne and at CARBAP (Centre Africain de recherches sur bananiers et plantains) station at NjomM (Cameroon). The trained personnel will now serve as resource persons for the RPTS with backstopping assistance from UTA. Furthermore, a plant propagation manual consisting in step-by-step pictorial guides was produced for distribution to the RPTS as training materials for future use.By A. T. and J.d'A.H. in In Ghana, a large-scale hybrid dissemination process was launched in 1998, resulting in the establishment of three primary plant multiplication plots with BITA-2, BITA-3, PITA-2, PITA-5, PITA-ll, PITA-I3, and FHlA-21 in three regions (Ash anti, Central, and Eastern).Secondary sites were also established in these regions and extended to the other three plantain-producing regions (Brong Ahafo, Volta, and Western) of Ghana (Fig. 2). We now -16- plan to mass-propagate and disseminate from the secondary sites the improved hybrids to farmers during 2002-2004.by A. T. in collaboration with NARES, KULeuven, and IPGRI (also under Project D)Another country targeted for mass distribution of improved hybrids in West and Central Africa is Cote d'Ivoire where preparation for distribution of PITA-3 and PITA-14 have started.In Cameroon, the field evaluation of several improved hybrids introduced in 2001 from Onne (Nigeria) to Mbalmayo has been completed with the identification ofBITA3, PITA14, PITA21, PITA23, FHIA23, and FHIA25 as the most promising hybrids for Cameroon. These will undergo mass-propagation for on-farm demonstration trials backed by training in rapid multiplication techniques and assistance in developing a decentralized network of plantain seedling multiplication in collaboration with the Ministry of Agriculture.Hybrid dissemination was also undertaken in Uganda with five IITA-bred hybrids (BITA-2, BITA-3, PITA-8, PITA-14, and PITA-17). The hybrids BITA-2 and BITA-3 were also included in the largest scale hybrid distribution scheme ever undertaken in eastern Africa.Culminating in the distribution of nearly 1 million seedlings of improved varieties since 1997 in northern Tanzania under the Kagera Community Development Program, it was implemented by the Belgian Technical Cooperation in collaboration with KULeuven and with financial support from the DGDC. This dissemination scheme will be boosted by additional support from USAlD in 2002-2003, which also targets Mozambique.While UTA's primary intervention zone is sub-Saharan Africa, demand for UTA hybrids has been coming from outside the continent. Thus, IITA-bred hybrids have been reach• ing farmers in Latin America (e.g., BITA-2, BITA•3, PITA-S, PITA-10, PITA•14, PITA-17, distributed to farmers in the departments of Leon and Chinandega in Nicaragua in the framework of a KULeuven coordinated project with possible spillover into neighboring countries).Likewise, the hybrid BITA. This activity was embedded in the hybrid delivery schemes, whereby farmers field days (FFD) were held to demonstrate new processing options in addition to displaying the new hybrids. In Nigeria, for example, most hybrids have produced fruits at virtually all farm sites, justifying our efforts to hold as many FFDs as possible to showcase the improved varieties to nonhost communities. The FFDs not only provide opportunities to showcase the new varieties, but also constitute avenues for displaying several value-adding postharvest processing options (Fig. 3) that can generate extra income for those adopting them. Furthermore, practical demonstrations of good farming practices and easy-to•perform field multiplication techniques are carried out to assist those who choose to grow the new varieties.In 2002 alone, about 20 FFDs have been held with more than 1400 participants and public television coverage, which provided means of reaching a larger audience. This public aware• ness drive has also benefited from radio broadcasts using local dialects. It is estimated that more than 50 000 people have been reached by the awareness campaign, the consequences of which is increased interest in, and request for, improved hybrids.It is becoming increasingly clear that the processing/marketing end of the plantain enterprise may not be physically connected with the production end, i.e., separate groups of people express interest in one versus the other, rarely both. This indicates that market information systems may need to be put in place to link these two ends of the production-processing continuum.by A. T. in collaboration with B. Faturoti, T. Adeniji, and S. AkeleThe major cause of micronutrient deficiencies in sub-Saharan Africa is inadequate intake of foods rich in micronutrients. In Nigeria, plantain and banana are one of the major starchy staples and provide an important source of rural income in the local food economies. UTA -IS- has developed several disease resistant and high•yielding hybrids that produce two to five times more than traditionallandraces, under natural conditions with no chemical control of black Sigatoka. Increased concentration of micronutrients, such as provitamin A, iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn), in otherwise disease-resistant hybrids could be a cost•effective approach to improve the micronutrient status for areas of subsistence farming which are beyond the market reach of fortified foods.Thus, several plantain and banana hybrids currently distributed to farmers in the Nigerian plantain belt were compared to Agbagba, the most popular plantain landrace consumed in Nigeria. Bunches were harvested at green (unripe) stage and fruits were subjected to micronutrient analysis in fresh form for pro-vitamin A (rJ•carotene) content or after drying for iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) content. Another set of analysis was done for Fe and Zn after processing of fruits into chips.Preliminary results indicate that four plantain hybrids (pITA•14, PITA-21, PITA-24, and PITA-25) and one cooking banana hybrid (BITA-7) had both higher iron and zinc content than the preferred landrace Agbagba (Fig. 4). Two other hybrids, one plantain (pITA•17) and one cooking banana (BITA•3), h ad higher zinc content than the landrace, but did not contain more iron than the landrace.The recommended dietary a llowances (RDA) for an aver age adult male or female is 10 mg and 18 mg Fe/day, r espectively, 15 mg Znlday for both adult male and female. Thus, the landrace Agbagba provides about 20% of Fe requirements for adult males, 11% of the Fe '\".s • FHIA-21. _ . _ ---j 4.0 5.0 6.0Iron content (mg/100g) Figure 4_ Micronutrient content in the flour of some improved plantain and banana hybrids_ needs for adult females, and about 6% of the Zn needs of either male or female adults for each 100 g of flour. In comparison, the five improved hybrids contribute from 24% to 55% of the adult males' Fe needs, 13% to 31% of the Fe needs offemale adults, and 6% to 22% of the Zn requirements for these people.Processing hybrids into chips resulted in simultaneous increase in the Fe and Zn contents of two hybrids (PITA•14 and PITA•26) well above the levels expressed by the landrace as shown in Table 14. Processing usually reduced iron content in other varieties but increased Zn content of several varieties (particularly PITA •24). A workshop was organized in November 2002 to review constraints and opportunities connected to the development of a competitive market-oriented cassava subsector in Nigeria. A strategy with emphasis on value-addition and productivity enhancement along the entire cassava value-chain was recommended, which could be pursued through a coalition of private/public sector partnership including farmers, processors, marketers, and other stakeholders.The overall objective must be to transform cassava from a basic commodity into some advanced commodities such as bakery products, noodles, creams, sweeteners, convenient snack foods, pellets, chips, starch, ethanol, gums for small-and large-scale industrial users. This will involve the setting up of collection points, with emphasis on farm-gate processing, the development of new processes, expanded seed multiplication, provision of new uses, and improvement in information management.The workshop identified the high cost of cassava production and poor product qualities as the major causes oflack of competitiveness of the Nigerian cassava subsector. It was pointed out that the key to the development of the cassava subsector is in the domestic industrial market because Nigeria has the largest domestic market in sub-Saharan Africa.Success in the industrial utilization of cassava in Nigeria lies in the promotion and enforcement, by government, of policies that will encourage the use of secondary processed cassava products as industrial raw material in Nigeria. The research on population dynamics of ARTS on various cassava genotypes continued in 2002. We concluded a trial on four cassava varieties in DRC and two varieties in Cameroon. While there are differences in ARTS abundance among cassava varieties tested, all germplasm was heavily attacked (over 200 scales per plant at peak densities). These trials will be repeated in 2003 with additional local and improved cassava germplasm in an effort to locate sources of resistance for ARTS_ Trials are also underway to quantify yield losses due to ARTS on various cassava germplasm in DRC and Cameroon.-21-Vegetation management in fallows to reduce African root and tuber scale infestations in cassava fields. Baseline survey of constraints associated with cassava in key sites in Cameroon by C. N, J.Lg., R.H., M.To., D.Co., S.D., and AT. This activity is due to be initiated in 2003 to establish the incidence and distribution of pests and diseases, abiotic and social factors restricting increased commercialization of cassava in Cameroon using funds from IITA Project E competitive grant.Assessment of the importance of nematodes to cassava production Assessment of the interaction between fungal root rots and nematodes on cassava Clones that perform best in response to CMD and well in other respects will be selected, multiplied, and later tested in on• farm trials prior to introduction into the pandemic mitigation multiplication program. IITA in ROC to be sensitive to the severe virus (EACMV-UG) associated with the pandemic. Three hectare blocks of MM 86 were multiplied at the three locations, and stems produced will be distributed by the FAa's Emergency Program to farmers. However, the ROC-IITA program will identify cassava clones with proven resistance to severe pandemic CMD for subsequent larger-scale multiplication. These materials will be obtained from the tissue culture introductions under small-scale multiplication and the 17 \"recovered\" IITA-origin clones currently being evaluated in CMD hotspots.Testing and distributing germplasm adapted to key pest and disease constraints, while preserving market preferencesby A. T. and A.G.O.D. in collaboration with P. flona, E. Njukwe, and J. Fanwoua In Cameroon, we undertook a study to evaluate together with rural women the performance of some improved cassava varieties in the forest zone. The study was initiated by John Wendt prior to his relocation to Uganda and conducted in 36 sites distributed in six villages with 13 improved UTA varieties and a local variety provided by the women. The local practices associated with cassava cultivation in the area were used to manage the trials while those related to cassava utilization guided the choice of evaluation criteria.The trials were entirely managed by women themselves, according to their normal cultural practices, but with participation of a research technician. The varieties were evaluated according to the following characteristics: total yield, tuber dry matter content, yield of marketable tubers, cooking ability, and taste.Five improved varieties were selected as the best for the region (Table 15). Interestingly, other varieties with high total yield appeared to be of little value for direct consumption. Thus, an evaluation based only on total yield would have been misleading, and this study showed that such errors could reduce the adoption rate of new cultivars. The pyramiding of multiple sources of resistant genes in these varieties is especially important for imparting durable CMD resistance in varieties that would prove difficult for various strains of the virus to circumvent. The characteristics of the new genotypes also reflect the vision of an expanded future role of cassava in SSA as a major source of income from industrial use and in the animal feed sector as well as many nontraditional food uses. These improved genotypes have been virus tested at Ibadan, Nigeria and are available for international distribution. In the case of Nigeria, 46 diverse CMD-resistant varieties have been selected and available for widespread deployment (Table 16).In order to get these materials into farmers fields as quickly as possible, a novel fasttrack varietal testing approach is piloted, in which new clones are rapidly multiplied on station, then taken straight for simultaneous multilocational evaluation on station and participatory evaluation in farmers' fields as well as promoting decentralized and large scale community-based multiplication and distribution centers at sites covering a diverse range of agroecologies.Target interventions for food security would include the provision of CMD-resistant planting materials and production technologies to producers. For income generation and equity, smallholder farmers and processors will be linked to high value markets where the majority of the value is retained in the rural sector. This will require collective action, NGO participation, development of enterprise skills and private sector involvement. As regards import substitution and foreign exchange earning, increased production efficiency; and the sale of low cost and high volume materials to major users and markets would be required.Emergency response to the outbreak of cassava mosaic disease in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Sud Kivu. All the trials in the first four provinces were evaluated during this trip and the summaries are shown below.Ten new genotypes of cassava, having high levels of beta• carotene content, were introduced and planted at Kola for preliminary evaluation. The genotypes included 0111115,0111273, 0111224, 0111663, 0111442, 0111649, 0111277, 0111646, 0111413, and 0111412. The demand for planting materials of such varieties is high particularly in Plateau de Bateke where the economic returns from the sale of yellow fleshed roots is high. The high levels of pro•vitamin A in such varieties make them important for improving diets in several villages where cassava is a major staple.Eight thousand cassava seedlings from 160 improved families were planted at Mvuazi in Bas Congo. These were evaluated at 3 MAP for multiple pest resistance. The pressure of cassava mosaic disease (CMD) was very high and over 60% of the seedlings showed severe damage symptoms. Resistant genotypes to CMD and CBB were tagged to facilitate selection at harvest.Crosses were made between selected and adapted parents to generate seeds for further selection. The cross combinations included improved x improved, improved x local, local x improved, and local x local. About 2000 fruits have been successfully produced and are awaiting maturity.A clonal evaluation trial comprising 100 cassava genotypes selected from the seedling nursery at Mvuazi was planted in December 2002 at three locations including Mvuazi (Bas Congo), Mbankana (Kinshasa), and Kiyaka (Bandundu). The performance of each genotype in terms of resistance to major pests and diseases was evaluated. At Mvuazi and Kiyaka, both of which are in the forest agroecology, the severity and incidence scores for CMD were comparatively high. Damage by CBB was highest at Mbankana in the savanna while CAD damage was only observed at Kiyaka. The number of genotypes that showed symptoms of damage by these diseases is shown by location in Table 17.A second set of clonal evaluation was planted only at Lubumbashi in the Katanga province and comprises of30 genotypes selected in 2001 by INERAfrom seeds at Mvuazi. At 3 MAP all the genotypes were clean for CBB and CAD. However, five of the genotypes showed severe damage symptoms ofCMD. These were evaluated at 3 MAP for multiple pest resistance. The trial at Tshela will also be used to evaluate for resistance to the African root scale (ARTS). At Mvuazi, CMD pressure was high while CBB and CAD pressures were low. Despite the high pressure of CMD 35 of the genotypes did not show symptoms of damage and were apparently resistant (Table 18).At Tshela, the pressures of CMD, CBB, and CAD were all very low, thus providing a good environment to evaluate the effect of ARTS alone, which is in abundance, on the performance of cassava. At Mbankana, CBB pressure was very high while CMD and CAD pressures were low (Table 18). Damage by CBB remains the major biotic constraint to cassava production in the Kinshasa province and only very few genotypes have so far shown some level of tolerance. At Kiyaka, damages by CMD, CBB, and CAD were moderate.Twenty-four genotypes were evaluated in this trial in two provinces Katanga and Kasai Orienta!. The genotypes comprised 21 introductions from UTA, 2 improved checks from IN ERA currently in multiplication, and 1 local check of the farmers in the region. At Katanga, the genotypes were evaluated at 3 MAP for resistance to major pests and diseases. Only one genotype, 9210053, showed symptoms of CMD at 5% incidence level while the others were clean for all the major diseases considered (Table 19).The best of farmers' selections from 2001102 PYT trials in each of 3 provinces (Bas Congo, Kinshasa, and Bandundu) were advanced to uniform yield trials in December 2002 at the same location.The number of genotypes evaluated at each location varied because of differences in farmers' choice at harvest. All the genotypes were evaluated at 3 MAP for resistance to CMD, CBB, and CAD (Table 20).The severity of CMD in this trial at 3 MAP was very high at Mvuazi where 4 of the genotypes, earlier thought to be resistant, showed some symptoms of the disease. However the incidence of attack was less than 5% in these varieties compared with the improved and local checks in which the incidence was above 80%.The situation was different at Mbankana and Kiyaka where the pressure of CMD was comparatively lower and most of the genotypes did not show any symptom of the disease.On the other hand, the CBB pressure was highest at Mbankana and no symptom of the disease was observed at the other 2 locations at 3 MAP. This differential in disease pressures calls for independent selection for each of the provinces. So far, the most promising gentoypes include 96/1439, 9610860, 9610160, 96/1630, 95/1009, 95/0925, 95/0528, 95/0211, 99/0395,9610267,96/1087, and 93/0170. Table 18. Damage scores of three major cassava diseases in preliminary yield trials at three locations in three provinces.-.------~---Mbankana Kiyaka----~-,-,--. , -------91/02327 At Lubumbashi in the Katanga province disease symptoms of CMD, CBB, and CAD were not observed on any of the improved genotypes as well as the improved and local checks. Plant establishment was low due to prolonged drought soon after the trial was planted.The data from the sister trial at Mbujimayi in Kassai Oriental were not available as at the time of this report.Ten other genotypes in UYT, selected by INERA from seed populations introduced from !ITA, were also evaluated at 3 MAP at 21ocations (Lubumbashi and Mbujimayi). At Lubum• bashi, in the Katanga province, disease symptoms of CBB and CAD were not observed on any ofthe improved genotypes as well as the checks. However, damage by CMD was severe on 3 ofthe improved selections (Table 22). The data from the trial at Mbujimayi in Kassai Oriental were not available as at the time ofthis report.This trial was planted in Sud Kivu according to the plan of work that was jointly prepared with Mr Phemba for eastern Congo. As at the time of this evaluation there was no information on this trial. It is expected that Mr Phemba would forward available data as soon as possible. for Bas Congo, Kinshasa, Bandundu, and Katanga, respectively. In Bas Congo, 50fthe 17 improved genotypes under test showed symptoms of CMD in at least one site. However the incidence of the disease was less than 5%_ In Kinshasa, only one ofthe improved genotypes showed symptoms of CMD while no symptoms were observed on any of the genotypes in Bandundu and Katanga. Damage by CBB was observed only in Kinshasa at a moderate level on all the genotypes but there were indications that the level of damage could get worse. In Bandundu, damage by CAD was observed at an early stage, though at a low severity and incidence level, on all the genotypes_ In Table 23, the performance of each genotype is compared for the following 3 diseases (CMD, CBB, and CAD). Generally, the farmers' local varieties were highly susceptible, particularly to CMD across the provinces. The farmers themselves observed significant differences between the new genotypes and their conventional types at all sites and locations and this is evident from the choice they made at this stage of the trial. , 9611708, 96/1089A, 9610023, 9210398, 9510166, 0111229, 01/1311, 0111313, 0111581, 0111533,0111661, MV 021039, andTME 419.These new varieties are being rapidly multiplied at Mvuazi to increase available planting materials. Planting materials of at least 5 of the genotypes in on-farm trials will be delivered to FAO and SECID after the final evaluation in November 2003. Planting materials of other genotypes particularly those in preliminary yield trial will be needed in large quantities for the establishment of a new set of on-farm trials in 2003-2004.Arrangements were made to send improved varieties of cassava to Equateur for evaluation in collaboration with farmers. Two trials were identified as very important--{)n-station evaluation of 21 improved varieties in preliminary yield trial (PYT) and on-farm trials of the same set of genotypes. Mr N dombo Delo, having worked in this region in the past, was hired to plant these trials. The PYT was planted and 22 on-farm trials were established.The FAO representative in the country, as usual, was highly instrumental in providing the required logistics to transport the materials to Equateur.Intensive rapid multiplication of selected genotypes has been emphasized at Kolo in Bas Congo and Manpu in Plateau de Bateke. Two hectares of planting materials at approximately 40 000 plants per hectare have been produced at Kolo and another 0.5 ha at Manpu in Plateau de Bateke. Further intensive multiplication will continue in the coming months to ensure that sufficient planting materials for secondary multiplication and expanded on-farm trials are available by NovfDec 2003.Postharvest activities were continued in target communities in 2 provinces (Bas Congo and Bandundu) to demonstrate the income generation potential of the crop to farmers, particularly women. Improved methodologies for producing quality flour, starch, chips confectioneries and other food products were adapted to farmers' conditions using locally available tools.Practical workshops on the production and use. of unfermented cassava flour, starch, and chips were organized for women leaders and interested processors. The workshop at Kikwit was organized in collaboration with SECID. Requirements for the establishment of smallscale processing centers were discussed and at the moment, women at Kola (Bas Congo) have organized themselves into groups for the commercial production of cassava flour.Table 24 shows the number and gender of participants at the workshops.At the end of the workshops, there was a high demand for cassava flour by women who wanted to evaluate the market friendliness and acceptability of the new products. In response to this demand, 120 kg of quality flour was produced by a local women NGO (AFEPA). Twenty kilogram of the flour was given as starting material to women groups at Kinzau-vuete, Lukula, and Tshela in Bas Congo. The women of AFEPA sold the remaining quantity of flour to generate income for the association. The cassava flour business is already booming. Another 130 kg of quality flour was produced to meet increasing demand for cassava flour for confectioneries. Women groups in Bas Congo and Bandundu received at least 20 kg of flour to enable them evaluate market acceptability of cassava-based confectioneries. Subsequently, these women are expected to produce by themselves large quantities of quality flour for sale in the local market. To realize this objective, the only available grating/chipping machine, introduced from UTA in 2002, will be rotated on village basis to -34-enable women grate or chip fresh cassava roots, which will be dried and milled into flour. More grating/chipping machines are urgently needed to sustain this growing market.In order to make cassava-processing machines more readily available and at an affordable price for processors in DRC, local fabricators of machines were identified for the direct reproduction and perhaps modification of the prototype from UTA to suit local demands.With the assistance of Mr Bernard Musangu of SECID, 3 fabrication centers were visited in Kinshasa. Each company's potential for mass production of quality machines at an affordable price was assessed and compared with others.Chanimetal has the highest capacity for mass production of quality machines, however the price quoted for each unit ofthe machine (without the motor) is very high compared with that of other companies (Table 25). The most probable company that can guarantee quality at an affordable price is ITI (Institut Technique Industriel). The comparative advantage of this company over others can further be considered from the point of view that it is affiliated to a technical school, where students are trained in machine fabrication. This will ensure that more fabricators are available in the future for the production and servicing of cassava processing machines locally. Selected Grater/Chipper (11 ) 500.00IT! = Institut Technique Industriel. Prices quoted are exclusive of the motor, which is estimated at US$400 max.Ongoing and future activitiesEstablishing nutrient deficiency symptoms in yam and addressing soil fertility constraints through efficient use of organic and inorganic amendmentsIn vitro plantlets of D. alata and D. rotundata were transplanted into and maintained in water culture. Nutrient omission treatments, -N, -P, -K, -Ca, -Mg, -B, -Zn, •Mn, -Mo, -Cu and -Fe were applied in comparison with control (full nutrient status).The symptoms observed were photographed 30 days after transplanting. These would serve as a guide in the identification of nutrient deficiencies in the field that often confound diseases caused by viruses and fungi.Farm-level soil fertility depletion is a fundamental cause of steady productivity decline in yam production during the past four decades, as pressure increased on land and fallow periods shortened or even disappeared. A study was conducted to identify the determinants of adoption decisions and intensity of application of mineral fertilizers in yam cultivation. Knowledge generated will be crucial for designing new approaches to soil fertility maintenance and continuous culture of yam, while increasing productivity, assuring food and income security, and fostering sustainable resource management in Eastern and Central Nigeria.Commercially oriented as opposed to subsistence production of yams has a positive influence on the probability of fertilizer adoption. Farmers' geographic location and ethnic background had a positive influence on the likelihood of fertilizer use. Among the seven states covered in the survey, the probability of adoption increases with farmers originating from Taraba and Nasarawa. Farmers from the Tiv ethnic group were more likely to apply fertilizer on yams than their Igbo, Igala, and Mada counterparts, the major ethnic groups encountered during the survey.Among adopters, age and gender of the farm operator, extension contacts, farm size, the number of other crops fertilized on the farm and market orientation in production influenced the intensity of fertilizer application on yams. Older producers are more likely to apply fertilizer on a large share of their yam fields as opposed to younger ones. The same pattern is predicted for females as opposed to male producers. Because yams are usually grown before other crops on newly cleared land or after a fallow period, this finding provides evidence that female and older producers may be growing yams more frequently on the same plots or on marginal lands. The intensity of fertilizer application increases with the size of yam cultivation as measured in number of mounds, the number of other crops fertilized on a farm, and with commercially oriented production. In view of the large amount of seed and labor requirement in yam production, farm size is an indication of the level of economic resources available to producers.The objectives of this study were to: (1) evaluate farmers' perception of yam inter-cropping with Glyricidia sepium;(2) evaluate farm-level economic viability ofthe technique; and (3) identify factors explaining adoption and nonadoption.Adopters of the technology acknowledged its contribution to soil fertility improvement (100%), reduction of fallow periods (55%), production of stakes (53%), and prevention of soil erosion (13%). Yet, a number of constraints, namely competition between yam and G. sepium trees (22%), high labor requirement, particularly for tree pruning (49%), and difficulties in the provision and growth of seedlings (13%) restricted the intensity of adop-tion_ A limited number offarmers (1.5%) also faced insecurity over farmland that prevented them from using the technology.Other farmers abandoned the technology on grounds of additional constraints, namely the reduction in area for planting yam, and the belief that Glyricidia trees will deplete soil fertility in the long run. The lack of information and lack of interest regarding the technique were the constraints identified by 53% and 21 % of nonadopters, respectively. Insufficiency of farmland (11%) and difficulties to access seedlings of Glyricidia sp. (8%) were also mentioned.Results from the multinomial Logit model show that the likelihood of adoption of Glyricidia intercropping with yam is associated with male farmers, age, the number of extension contacts, and security over farmland. In addition, inheritance rights over farmland and education have positive influences on the probability of adoption among current adopters and former users, respectively. Yet, it declines for farmers that have insufficient farmland. Furthermore, adopters do not consider the technology as a means for producing stakes in yam cultivation.Partial budget analysis using farm-level data shows that intercropping yams with G. sepium is economically viable with a marginal rate of return of 7 that is slightly more than double farmers' minimum acceptable rate of return.The introduction in the Zou-Nord Benin of Glyricidia as a soil fertility management crop is well accepted by few farmers who acknowledge its advantages. However, young farmers and female farmers were not attracted to the technology, which could be an introduction bias. The constraints enumerated in the zone suggest that additional technical support would be necessary to help these farmers take full advantage of the technique and encourage nonadopters to develop interest. This could be achieved through increased extension contacts and assuring security over land.In view of the high profitability of the technology compared to low adoption and high abandon rates, research efforts need to evaluate the technology within the context of whole farm planning where many crops compete for limited resources.Addressing pests and diseases, particularly nematodes, through improved and clean planting material and agronomic measures adapted to farmer circumstancesDuring the year, 18000 virus-tested in vitro plantlets were produced from certified germplasm stocks of D. rotundata and D. alata. A total of 16 000 plantlets were transplanted into protected screenhouses leading to the production of 12 950 minitubers for international distribution. From these 5145 and 4253 minitubers were delivered to partners in Benin and Togo, respectively, for field multiplication and evaluation. The remainder was reserved for delivery to partners in Sierra Leone early in 2003. Pathogenicity studies of different geographic isolates within Nigeria have shown different levels of damage between different isolates in pots, but not in the field. Both field and pot experiments are being repeated in the forthcoming year. Differences were limited, but comparisons of those isolates, which differed from each other in levels of damage, are currently being made for differences in DNA material. Material from other yam-growing countries in West Africa has also been sourced for assessment of variability. Nematodes from the different countries will be assessed for pathogenic differences in the coming year, under quarantine. Development of a reproductive fitness assessment assay on agar proved unsuccessful. Alternative culture mediums are currently being assessed.Specific regions of the DNA from individual nematodes have been extracted and amplified using primers for Dl domain of 28S rDNA, IGS of rDNA, ITS of rDNA, and mitochondrial COl gene. DNA from individual nematodes of different isolates have been analyzed using different restriction endonucleases. DNA polymorphisms within and between populations have been identified. Analysis of incoming, new material continues.Results ofthe comparison of the polymorphisms with data on pathogenicity of the nematode should allow us to develop and test appropriate molecular probes for the nematode.Field trials were conducted in Ibadan, Nigeria and at Cotonou, Benin to assess the interaction between fertilizer (NPK) application and Scutellonema. bradys nematode damage on yam cv. Td131. Results are yet to be analyzed. The trials will be repeated during 2003 in more detailed experimental design and treatments, involving the multidisciplinary approach to assessing reducing yam production, using UTA Project E competitive grant funds.Genetic improvement of yams at IITA focuses on Guinea (Dioscorea rotundata and D. cayenensis) and water (D. alato) yams. Guinea yams are indigenous to West Mrica. They are the most preferred yams and also those with the highest market value owing to the organoleptic properties of their tubers that suit the most prevalent food use for the crop in the region. D. ala to, introduced to Mrica from Asia during the 16th century, is next in terms of volume of production and extent of utilization to the Guinea yams but it is the most widely distributed Dioscorea species in the world.Primary geographical focus of UTA's yam improvement work is on the dominant yamproduction zones of coastal West and Central Mrica (WCA). It is however recognized that yam cultivation has continued outside those zones in many countries of Mrica, often as a minor component of the farming systems. Annual and perennial wild/semi-domesticated Dioscoreo species continue to serve as important reservoirs of food in Mrica during periods of food shortage.Yams bring a lot of flexibility to the annual cycle offood availability in many areas through the multiplicity of cultivars, agroecological adaptation, maturity periods, as well as options for storage and utilization. Moreover the crop has high commercial value that can be exploited for alleviation of poverty. It is important to understand the minor, but significant, role that the crop plays outside the main production belt in WCA and explore opportunities -38-for expansion of production and utilization of the crop, where relevant, with the aims of enhancing food security and income generation for farmers and consumers.The objectives for yam improvement at UTA include high yield of dry matter per unit area and unit time; resistance to diseases (e.g., anthracnose, viruses, tuber rots) and pests (e.g., nematodes, beetles); tuber characteristics that are valued by consumers (e.g. size, shape culinary quality, and shelf life). Farmers have been relying on natural genetic variation for their selection of suitable yam cultivars to cope with the deteriorating resource base in the major yam producing areas.The pace of this is not compatible with the increasing challenges in the physical and socio• economic environment. Farmer'participatory testing, which combines farmers' indigenous knowledge and long experience with the expertise of breeders, is one of the approaches being used for the selection of new cultivars that are more suited to the current challenges as well as opportunities.Planting materials for production of ware yams (large tubers for market or home con• sumption) are derived from the edible portion, the tuber, which is expensive and bulky to transport. Farmers often use small tubers from the previous harvest or cut portions oflarge tubers as planting materials. For early maturing varieties of D. rotundata, harvesting of tubers about two-thirds into the growing season without destroying the root system ('milking') provides early yams for home consumption and market. This also allows the regeneration of fresh small tubers from the corm at the base of the vine. These small tubers are harvested at the end ofthe season and used as planting materials for the next season.The multiplication ratio for seed yam production in the field is very low (less than 1:10) compared, for instance, to some cereals (1:300). The technique of rapid multiplication using small tuber pieces (e.g., 25 g weight, called a minisett) in field nurseries has been developed and used for acceleration of the multiplication process. Meristem culture and micropropagation in vitro offer even higher multiplication rates and healthier propagules.For bulbiferous cultivars of D. alata, there is another option for propagation through the bulbils while the use of botanic seeds and vine cuttings require more research effort to become viable alternatives in the future.Breeding lines of D. alata and D. rotundata were evaluated in comparison with local check cultivars in preliminary, advanced, and uniform yield trials at Owerri and Ikenne (forest zone),lbadan (forest/savanna transition zone), Ubiaja, and Abuja (southern Guinea savanna) in Nigeria.For instance in uniform yield trials of 12 advanced clones of D. alata with 4 popular local check cultivars, three of the advanced clones TDa 98101166, TDa 98/01168, and TDa 991 00240 each had a mean yield across five sites (Abuja, Ikenne, Ibadan, Owerri, and Ubiaja) that was about twice as much as that of the best local check. Owerri was the poorest site with a mean yield of 5.11 tonneslha while Ubiaja was the best with 25.51 tonneslha. The yields at Ubiaja for the two top yielding clones TDa 98/01166 and TDa 98101168 were 38.3 and 39.4 tonneslha, respectively.Another set of D. alata clones were evaluated in a uniform yield trial at Abuja, Ikenne, and Ubiaja in Nigeria for symptoms of leaf blight (lfb), leaf spot (lsp), anthracnose (ant), and -39-virus (vir) infections. This was done on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 = no or negligible infection and 5 = maximum expression of symptoms, giving the results shown in Table 26. TDa 297 and TDa 92-2 were used as local check cultivars with the former being known for its moderate reaction to the diseases evaluated_Regional varietal trials with NARS Regional trials were conducted at several sites in West Africa in partnership with national yam programs within an IFAD-sponsored project (TAG 457) based on clonal germplasm supplied by IITA and local selections from seed populations_ Populations of Dioscorea rotundata developed for high yield and pest resistance formed the basis for identification of superior new clones by partners in the five major yam praducing countries of West Africa (Nigeria, Benin, Togo, Ghana, Cote d'Ivoire).Selections were made from these trials on the basis of tuber yield; reaction to viruses, anthracnose (leaf scorch) disease, leaf spot, leaf blight, and nematodes; and tuber quality (dry matter content, culinary attributes). New clones, superior in yield and pest resistance to popular local yam varieties, were identified among the introductions in each of these countries.Table 26_ Mean scores of D. alata clones evaluated in a uniform yield trial at three locations in Nigeria for leaf blight (lfb), leaf spot (lsp), anthracnose (ant), and virus (vir) infections, using a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 = no or negligible infection and 5 = maximum expression of symptoms. -40-Fifty-two new clones of the species were provided for farmer-participatory evaluation in six states of Nigeria and a set of 12 leading clones were delivered to partners in each of the five key countries for a regional collaborative trial.New clones of Dioscorea alala selected for high tuber yield and food quality as well as anthracnose resistance were delivered to, and evaluated on-station with partners in Nigeria (18 clones) and Cote d'Ivoire (36 clones).Selections from earlier introductions are under on-farm evaluation with farmers in Cote d'Ivoire. These and other germplasm of the two species delivered to partners in West Mrica during the year for various purposes are shown in Table 27. Producers' demand for varietal characteristics of yam in Nigeria: an ex-ante evaluation for adoption of new technologiesThe objective of this study was to evaluate farmers' preferences for yam characteristics and assess their expectations from varietal improvement programs. The knowledge generated will give yam breeders an indication of the ex-ante adoption of improved varieties yet to be disseminated to producers.The knowledge will be essential for the development of desirable genetic material in future yam breeding programs that aim at adequate adoption, increased food security, and higher incomes at the farm level. Results will also help extension agents and rural development initiatives to efficiently target adopters of the improved varieties by matching characteristics with farmers' preferences, social and demographic parameters.A survey was conducted in East-Central Nigeria corresponding to the eastern section of the yam production belt_ The area comprises seven states namely, Benue, Ebonyi, Enugu, Federal Capital Territory, Kogi, Nasarawa, and Taraba.Results from the ordered Probit models show that producers preferred pounded yam (sticky dough prepared by pounding boiled tuber pieces) that is white, shiny, smooth, nonsticky, easy to mold, and elastic. These attributes highly influenced the likelihood of a variety being ranked ideal for processing into pounded yam. The ranking of varieties did not differ according to the gender of producers but with respect to other sociodemographic and geographic parameters such as yam growing experience, education, and state of origin.Producers preferred boiled yam that is white, dry, mealy, and sweet to taste, regardless of yam species. For D. rotundata species, soft texture of boiled yam was most preferred.Even though preferences differed across state boundaries but not with respect to gender these attributes played a significant role in the classification of producers' varieties for their suitability for boiling. Similarly for amala (a sticky dough prepared by stirring yam flour in boiling water), producers preferred a paste that is light-brown in color, has smooth texture, is non-sticky, easy to mold, and elastic, with some differences across states and ethnic groups. Elasticity, texture, and stickiness highly influenced the probability of a variety being classified as ideal for amala.Among agronomic and morphological characteristics, producers prefer varieties that are early-maturing, high-yielding, and readily marketable. Tubers should be large in size, smooth skinned, cylindrically shaped, and easy to harvest, without enzymatic browning of the flesh or shrinkage in storage. There were differences among producers in the ranking of D. rotundata varieties on the basis of gender, yam-growing experience, and State, but not across ethnic groups. For D. alata, ranking differed according to state and ethnicity only. Men and women were similar in the order of importance of yam characteristics, based on average scores. Among the main dishes prepared with yam, the three most important characteristics were color, texture, and consistency for pounded yam; sweet taste, white color, and soft texture for boiled yam; and light brown color, with a lump-free texture that is easy to mold for amala. Regarding the 12 agronomic and morphological characteristics analyzed, high and stable yield, good marketability, large tuber size, and growth cycle were the most important to producers.Varietal improvements targeting good agronomic, morphological, and marketability traits should not come at the expense of sweet taste as the outcome will be less attractive to women or short cooking time as this will be less attractive to men if the variety is to be used as boiled yam. Similarly, it should not hinder the smooth texture of amala (valued by women) or non-sticky and elastic amala (valued by men).Quality of the tuber for the preparation of yam-based foods is a major criterion for acceptance of new yam varieties by farmers and consumers. Yam tubers are mostly consumed with sauce directly after boiling, frying in oil, or roasting. They may also be cooked into pottage with added protein sources and oils. One major method of preparation that is well appreciated in coastal West Mrica is the boiling and pounding of the tuber pieces into a thick dough (called 'tutu' or 'pounded yam') that is consumed with soup. Another popular dough (called 'amala' in Nigeria and Benin and 'konkonte'in Ghana) is prepared in hot water from flour derived from dried yam tubers. The popularity of this product is increas• ing in urban areas owing to the convenience in its preparation. The product has also been introduced to processors and consumers in Cote d'Ivoire, Burkina Faso, and Cameroon through the same project entitled: Raising the value of yams on the urban market. A few commercial products based on dry flakes or flours from the tuber are produced in Nigeria and Cote d'Ivoire for export and sale in urban areas. These are produced by peeling, dicing, sulphite bathing, cooking, mashing, drying, and flaking followed by packaging. However the yam sector currently needs additional innovative processing technologies that could reduce food losses and create new products with higher added value. In order to address this efficiently it is necessary to understand the properties of the tuber that relate to high quality of food products. The objective of this experiment was to establish a fast protocol for screening yam geno• types for food quality by evaluating the textural characteristics of 'pounded yam' from varieties of D. alata and D. rotundata using sensory texture profile analysis and relating this to instrumental texture profile analysis. Pounded yam is a very popular yam dish in West Mrica prepared by pounding boiled tuber pieces into a sticky dough that is consumed with soup.Sensory analysis is a scientific method used to evoke, measure, analyze, and interpret those responses to products as perceived through the senses of sight, smell, touch, taste, and hearing. For instrumental texture profile analysis a texturometer was used that measures texture by simulating the action of the human jaw (deforming food via a pivotal motion).From the results of sensory texture profile analysis, textural qualities that are considered important in pounded yam are: adhesiveness, cohesiveness, elasticity, hardness, and smoothness. Fibrousness was not considered an important textural quality in pounded yam since both yam species (D. rotundata and D. alata) gave pounded yams that were fibrous, and it did not affect the acceptability of the texture of the pounded yam by the trained panellists. It was therefore concluded that textural notes associated with a good quality pounded yam are: a reasonable degree of adhesiveness, cohesiveness, elasticity, moderate softness but firmness (so that it will be deformable or easily squeezed with the hand). Pounded yam prepared from D. rotundata varieties met these criteria. Textural qualities of pounded yam from D. alata species were considered very poor. The pounded yam samples were less cohesive, very soft, not elastic, lumpy (not smooth), and highly sticky (adhesive).Storage of fresh yam tubers before use improved the textural qualities of the pounded yam produced from them. Pounded yam made from stored yams from the two yam species was judged to have better textural qualities than those made from freshly harvested yams. Storage of the yams gave pounded yam that was less sticky, cohesive, moderately soft (not hard), firm (not still) and very elastic (high resilience value in instrumental texture profile analysis (TPA) pounded yam.There were highly significant positive correlations between the five dominant instrumental TPA parameters: Hardness, cohesiveness, springiness, stringiness, adhesiveness and the sensory parameters: stickiness, elasticity, cohesiveness, and hardness. Deformability had lower correlation coefficients with other instrumental TP A parameters and may not be a significant parameter to consider in instrumental TPA of pounded yam. In sensory TPA since it shows whether the pounded yam is fIrm, and deformable or very hard and stiff.Four dominant parameters (adhesiveness, springiness, cohesiveness and hardness) can be picked from eight TPA parameters (fracturability, cohesiveness, gumminess, chewiness, adhesiveness, springiness, resilience, and hardness) extracted from the TPA force•compres• sion curve correlated with the sensory TPA. These parameters can be used for objective assessment of texture in pounded yam. This means that from the result of the TPA analysis, the harder pounded yam is, the more cohesive and more elastic it could be. Also it can be less deformable depending on whether the softness or hardness is at two extreme ends. A desirable degree of adhesiveness (stickiness) is also important.Highly significant correlations between instrumental and sensory texture profile analyses parameters show that the former can be used as an objective method for the measurement of textural qualities of pounded yam as an alternative to sensory evaluation using trained panelists.byK.A.A survey was conducted in the Isati, Dereboua, and Dimori regions located in three yam production ecologies. The study found that men predominantly manage yam production although 85% of the households have one to fIve women involved in agricultural activities.Farmers do not manage many yam plots, contrary to other food crops, as a way to take advantage of soil types and microclimates, and to minimize the risks of crop failure. The number of yam plots is limited to one (58%) or 2 plots (33%).Although yam is a major contributor to the diet and food security in the study areas, there is a high degree of commercialization of production to generate income. About 72% of producers commercialize 20-65% of disposable output. Harvesting and sale of fresh tubers are mainly spread over five to six months, but some prefer selling their harvest in December or in April.Most of these sales take place in the village market places. However, 30% of producers carry their products beyond their villages to nearby towns and cities. Others sell yam on markets across the national border (Ghana). A number of farmers (17%) have declared growing varieties such as Koukou, Alassora, Keke, Kratsi, and Wamba specifically for processing into chips that they commercialize in many types of markets during the peak period of June through August.Traders offresh tubers and chips are mainly women (98%) that are highly organized along the marketing channel into collectors, semi• and wholesalers, and retailers. They operate within specific zones and with different capacities. Collectors purchase yam products from primary rural markets directly from producers. These collectors then sell to intermediaries andlor wholesalers that assure distribution to other wholesalers and retailers. In many cases, this distribution takes place through a middleman and from the production zones to consumption centers in the country.Occasionally, some traders (12%) target regional markets in Ghana, Burkina Faso, and Niger with fresh tubers, but not with chips. Skin bruises, tuber rot, and pest damages in -44-storage are the major constraints to traders (63%). As a result, there is a high stock turnover and 54% of traders manage to sell yam within 10---12 days of acquisition. Yet, yam chips are easily stored and 50% of traders do so for 2 to 6 months.Transport service providers playa major role in linking production and consumption centers nationally and regionally. These services are not limited to yam alone but to other food and non-food commodities, as one would expect. A number of transporters (8%) confirmed hauling fresh tubers across national borders to other countries in the subregion namely, Ghana, Mali, and Niger.In terms of scale and geographic scope, many small vehicles cover short distances, each transporting a small share of marketed outputs. On the contrary, few lorries convey the bulk of yam tubers over longer distances. This practice suggests that on the margin, small vehicle size may be a more efficient way of product collection while medium and large capacities are more profitable in hauling.In conclusion, fresh yam tubers and dried chips are tradable food products that are well integrated in the marketing systems. They are sources of food as well as income for marketoriented farmers, traders, and other service providers. Production and trade activities are highly specialized according to gender and predominantly under the management of men and women, respectively. Markets are geographically segmented with many categories of participants.Further research should address, among other things, the extent and volume of spatial product flows, the transaction costs, and market efficiency, factors explaining market participation and how they affect the livelihood of the poor farmers and traders. The Sustainable Tree Crops Program (STCP) constitutes a coordinated and innovative effort made by farmers and producer organizations, the worldwide chocolate industry and trade, national governments, research institutes, the public sector, policymakers, donors, and development agencies to facilitate the improvement of smallholder agricultural systems based on tree crops in West Africa. With over 50% of the foreign exchange derived in West Africa coming from cocoa alone, it is clear that there are numerous groups now involved and committed to the tree crop commodities. Collectively, these groups, which typically bring different perspectives to the table, have shaped consensus around three common interests and concerns. They include: (1) promoting the production and marketing of quality cocoa, (2) improving market access and income for small-scale producers, and (3) creating systems that are environmentally friendly, socially responsible, and economically sustainable.The STCP goal is to improve the economic and social well-being of smallholders and the environmental sustainability of tree crops farms_ To achieve the STCP goal, a public-private sector partnership was created-the STCP West Mrican Development Alliance-to provide stakeholders with an organizational framework and policy environment under which they could improve the performance and efficiency of the system. Productivity of tree crop farms and enterprises are being raised, with emphasis on the rehabilitation and reclamation of deforested lands_ Efficiency in the marketing chain is being improved so that it delivers fair prices to farmers and quality products to end-users_ Only by lowering production and marketing costs will tree crops remain competitive and profitable for Mrican farmers on world markets. Achieving this and at the same time improving the state of natural resources, including biodiversity, land, soil and water, is the formidable task being undertaken by STCP. On the social and labor front, STCP is working to prevent hazardous working conditions and eliminate the worst forms of child labor, thereby improving standards on farms and in comm unities. If successful, the outcome of these efforts will be a more sustainable global economy for the focal tree crop systems, characterized by: increased rural incomes, reduced risk and greater stability in the supply of quality products to end users, increased demand for and use of tree crop products, better working conditions on farms, and an improved status of environmental resources for current and future generations of West Mricans to pursue their interests.STCP is a program that brings together all ofthese stakeholders and enables them to collaborate. To do this efficiently, a results framework with five strategic areas was adopted:(1) strengthening community-focused groups, ( 2) technology dissemination and research, (3) policy change and implementation, (4) market system and information system development, and (5) labor and social systems. The general approach being taken within each strategic area is to build on the existing efforts and activities of relevant stakeholder groups, to add value to them, and to coordinate future collaborations. Currently, the primary tree crops targeted by STCP in West Mrica are cocoa and cashew. Additional tree crops may be considered within the context of diversification of cocoa or cashew production systems.A regional program is being implemented which will enhance the synergies to be gained by working across institutions and countries to successfully develop sustainable tree crop production. The four largest Mrican cocoa producers (Cameroon, Cote d'I voire, Ghana, and Nigeria) are included in the program and account for approximately two-thirds of total world production. The flith member of the program is Guinea whose diversified agricultural economy includes cocoa, cashew, and robusta coffee as major subsectors. Furthermore, an integrated and holistic approach is taken within STCP to link developments in research, technology delivery, market systems, information systems, policy change, and community or producer-focused services.Currently, a series of STCP pilot projects are in the start-up phase in West Mrica; three pilot project sites have been identified in Cote d'Ivoire, and one in each of the other four countries (Cameroon, Ghana, Guinea, and Nigeria). The objective of these pilot activities are to compare, test, and validate different approaches and interventions to develop sustainable and integrated cocoa production systems, and to concurrently address child labor concerns in a coherent and systematic method. The ultimate goal of these pilot activities is to improve the rural livelihood of cocoa producers in West Mrica by improving their ability to respond to the demands of global markets. To support the pilot activities, three \"crosscutting\" regional projects have been developed in the following thematic areas: (1) child labor, ( 2) demand-driven technology delivery and research, and (3) trade and information systems. These projects are being developed by organizations with the necessary expertise and capabilities in the respective areas.Finally, a regional management structure has been developed to support and link the pilot projects and regional activities. The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (UTA) is hosting the STCP regional program and will manage it through the STCP Regional and National Coordination Units. The Child Labor Regional Project will be hosted and managed by the International Labor Organization In November 2002, a regional workshop was held for the broader STCP coalition to participate in and support this integrated and coordinated West African Regional Program to develop a holistic approach to sustainable tree crop systems in Cameroon, Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea, and Nigeria. The workshop was organized jointly by the Government of Ghana (COCOBOD), the US Government, the international cocoa industry (Global Issues Group), and UTA. Specifically, three areas were addressed during the workshop:• STCP Action Plan: A common understanding of the rationale for and details of the Pilot Phase Action Plan of STCP and the framework for its implementation was developed.• STCP Interventions: The successes in interventions to date and innovations necessary to achieve the STCP goal were showcased and discussed for further assimilation into the program.• STCP Coalition: The coalition between farmer organizations, industry, governments, international agencies, research and extension for implementing STCP activities was consolidated and further strengthened.The STCP Action Plan, initiated in October 2002, has now moved into full implementation of its 3-year program, building on the insights provided by this workshop. The Action Plan includes pilot projects in each ofthe member countries focusing on developing the capacity of farmer organizations, and regional projects that provide technical support to the pilots in addressing issues on trade and information systems, technology dissemination, research, and child labor. The child labor component is implemented through the WACAP Program of ILOIIPEC. Existing linkages with complementary programs are being formalized (e.g., with Socodevi and Creative Associates) and new ones will be pursued. At the end of the workshop, the members of the Sustainable Tree Crop Development Alliance ensured their support for the Action Plan of STCP. With this workshop, the 3-year regional Action Plan was launched.Create and strengthen regional market and information systems, which enhance the efficiency of the tree crop sector, i.e., primarily cocoa and associated cropsAmong the perennial tree crops, the cocoa sector is of particular interest for the humid forest region and for the global chocolate industry, as approximately 60% of the world supply of cocoa originates from West and Central Africa, and producing countries derive a large proportion of their foreign exchange earnings from cocoa.The main objective ofthis research was to understand the general constraints and opportunities of cocoa-based systems in the humid forest zone of West and Central Africa (cashew as concerned Guinea), in view to increase the productivity of agricultural land and labor employed by asset-poor households, and thus contribute to alleviation of rural poverty.An extensive baseline survey of 5457 farmers in major cocoa growing regions (cashew growing regions in Guinea), was conducted in 2001 in Cote d'I voire, Ghana, Nigeria, Cameroon, and Guinea, to provide basic parameters of cocoaJcashew based systems in the region.In all of the countries surveyed, villages and clusters of households were randomly selected and household heads interviewed using structured questionnaires. In Nigeria, 1083 households were visited in 35 villages and towns of Ondo State which accounts for between 40 and 50% of annual production in Nigeria. In Cameroon, 1003 households and 83 villages in the Southwest, Center and South Provinces were visited, with production from these sites accounting for over 80% of national production. In Ghana, the surveys were conducted with 1000 households from 85 villages in the Brong Ahafo, Ashanti, Eastern, and Western regions which together account for approximately 90% of national production. In Cote d'Ivoire, a list of farmers obtained from a national census of cocoa and coffee producers conducted in 1998 provided the opportunity of selecting households with known probability of selection. In all, 1372 households from 20 subdivisions and 134 villages, hamlets and cocoa \"camps\" across the cocoa belt of Cote d'Ivoire were visited. In Guinea, 999 farmers were visited in Boke and Mandiana areas.Table 28 summarizes information on land ownership by crop types in the cocoa belt of the four countries. Compared with other crops, cocoa areas are the most important. Cocoa production across the region is in the hands of small family farms. The average cocoa area planted per household was 4.5 ha in Cote d'Ivoire, 5 ha in Cameroon, 6.4 ha in Ghana and 4.6 ha in Nigeria. In Guinea, the average cashew area was 3.12 ha.Cocoa production is just one component in the rural livelihoods of most households. Nearly all households also grow food crops for both consumption and the market and in Cote d'Ivoire about half of the cocoa producers also grow robusta coffee on small plots. Other common perennial cropping systems include oil palm, and in some areas citrus production.Relatively small portions of the planted areas were dedicated to food crops; with the areas -48- allocated ranging between 1.3 ha (Ghana) and 2.5 ha (Cameroon). It is also important to note that if in some countries (Cameroon), forestlands are still important, land shortage is apparent in Nigeria and Ghana.Cocoa revenues are often the largest source of revenues for many households (Table 29).The average cocoa share in household income ranges from a low of 50% in Cameroon to a high of 67% in Nigeria. In Ghana, the average share of cocoa revenues was 56% while in Cote d'l voire the average share of cocoa revenues among the surveyed households was 51 % and 21.5% for coffee. In Guinea the contribution of cashew is only 9%. The low yields reflect in part the low prices in recent years, which have caused farmers to reduce the amount of inputs applied to their tree stock investments. The most impor• tant of these inputs are labor and agrochemicals for fertilization and controlling pest and disease.Agrochemicals use showed a wide variation by country. Nigeria and Cameroon have the largest proportion of farmers applying some kind of chemical inputs (88% and 84%, respectively). While in Ghana and Cote d'lvoire less than 50% are concerned. In Guinea, very few farmers (2%) use chemical inputs. An important problem with the agrochemical use is the place of purchase. An important proportion of farmers purchased chemical inputs from unlicensed private suppliers (Table 30). These sources do not necessarily provide certified quality of chemical inputs. This can potentially lead to serious health problems. The use of pesticide on cocoa farms requires special capital equipment. Ownership of capital equipment for pesticide application is very low (Table 31). Knapsack sprayer is the most common equipment mainly in Cameroon where 72% of farmers use it. This is naturally related to the high prevalence of cocoa black-pot disease in Cameroon. The use of more modern motorized equipment is globally very low. Most producers are smallholder farmers. The size of farms limits the possibilities for an individual ownership of some types of equipment. The proportion of farmers who do not have access to suppliers of improved varieties is relatively high in some countries (Table 32). This is the case in countries where the sector has been liberalized. Fifty-eight and 87% offarmers in Cameroon and Cote d'Ivoire, respectively, mention the lack of availability of suppliers of improved varieties. A consequence of this is that the largest portion of producers in all countries obtained planting material from existing farms/fields or volunteer seedlings (Table 32). These sources probably do not provide the latest improved varieties. Farmers who obtained planting material from market or the other sources (cooperative. government service) are more likely to use improved varieties-the proportion of farmers using these sources was high only in Ghana. -50-The adhesion of farmers to rural organization is still very low, even insignificant in a country like Ghana where only 9% of farmers belong to a group (Table 33).In the humid forest zone of Mrica, the private and nongovernmental sectors have been actively brought in after the liberalization of the cocoa sector. Specially, groups of farmers, in the form of producer associations, are among the best means of providing extension advice and thus extending new production techniques. It is noted that these groups are actually more active in the marketing part of the cocoa activity (Table 34). ------- Data in Table 35 show that cash credit is a very scare commodity in the rural sector. Eightynine percent offarmers in Cote d'lvoire 74% in Cameroon, 80.5% in Ghana, 47% in Nigeria, and 75% in Guinea did not have access to cash credit in 2001. The supply of rural credit has been divided into the 'formal' and 'informal' sectors. The formal sector includes banks, government agencies, cooperative credit unions, NGOs, etc. The informal sector is made up largely of individuals (traders, landlords or farmers themselves) who lend money as a business. The main source for farmers who received credit was the informal sector. Some farmers reported to have received in-kind credits (Table 35), mainly in Nigeria (44%) and in Cameroon (25%). The in-kind credit received is mainly made of fungicides, pesticides, and fertilizers.In recent years, with the liberalization of the cocoa sector, the credit sector has experienced many changes due to the withdrawal of government subsidized credit programs. The gap left by the withdrawal of government has been partly filled by the informal sector. However, the informal sector is traditionally characterized as being highly usurious and in positions of considerable power due to lack of local competition. The initial results of an experiment to compare the agronomic effects and environmental impacts of different copper fungicide regimes in cocoa are presented. Fungicide to control blackpod (Phytophthora megakarya Bras. & Griff) is the main external input used in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) systems in southern Cameroon. One of the most commonly used fungicides is 'Ridomil® Plus 72 W AP'; copper (I) oxide plus metalaxyl. However, at fluctuating cocoa prices, the spraying regime recommended by the manufacturer is not always profitable. Therefore the effects of a reduced spraying regime need to be assessed.In a survey conducted in eight southern Cameroonian villages, on average farmers classified 33% of their cocoa holdings as abandoned. Given increased interest in cocoa production due to higher market prices, it is important to know what yields are possible from previously abandoned fields and what is the yield response to fungicide.Losses of fungicide to the soil surface are inevitable, from dripping during the spraying, and during subsequent rainfall and thus there might be negative environmental consequences associated with application. Earthworms are 'ecosystem engineers' and maintaining their populations and consequent activities such as burrowing and cast production is an essential component in sustainable agricultural systems worldwide and their use as a bioindicator is widespread. The cocoa tree trunks, pods and leaves are sprayed manually up to 12 times per year during the rainy seasons using a knapsack sprayer. Soil organisms can tolerate metals by avoidance, reduced assimilation or increased excretion rates, uptake into compartments at the subcellular level and protein inductions. Earthworms can distinguish between litter contaminated with metal ions (zinc, copper) and that which is not, selecting the non-contaminated litter. However, there are very few in-situ studies on copper toxicology from the tropics. Cocoa pods were harvested as ripe from all trees within experimental plots. Mass of whole pods was recorded for each plot and the tree of origin was recorded. Pods were split in the lab and fresh mass of beans and empty pods measured. A subsample of empty pods from each plot was weighed for dry matter determination and dried at 55 DC to constant mass.Beans were fermented on a draining tray for six days and were regularly turned. Beans were sun-dried. On wet days, beans were dried in an airflow oven. Dry mass of beans was recorded.Two hundred beans (ten batches of twenty beans) per plot were randomly selected. Dry mass, and husk percentage were recorded. These data were used as a proxy for fat content as previous work has shown that beans weighing less than 1 g have a lower fat content.Soil Surface casting was measured in 1 m by 1 m frames with five frames per plot each adjacent to where the soil samples had been taken. All surface casts were collected from the frames twice. Casts were dried at 40 DC for 48 hours after each sampling and the dry mass per frame was recorded. Casts were bulked by plot.Cast and soil samples were ground to 2 mm for texture analysis and 0.5 mm for chemical analysis. Texture was determined using Day's procedure. The pH was determined in a water suspension at a 2:5 soil:water ratio. Exchangeable (exch.) Ca, Mg, K, Cu and total P were extracted by the Mehlich-3 procedure (Mehlich 1984). Cations were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and P by the malachite green colorimetric procedure. Organic C was determined by Heanes' improved chromic acid digestion and spectrophotometric procedure. Total N was determined using the Kjeldahl method for digestion and ammonium electrode determination.All datasets were analyzed using the GLM procedure in SAS v. 6.12.For earthworm cast production, the model used was an incomplete blocked two factorial where the cocoa treatments were nested within a 'cocoa versus forest' factor. Exploratory data analysis revealed that sample variances of earthworm cast amounts were correlated with the means. The data were thus transformed so that Y = sqrt (y) and all analysis were performed upon the transformed data.For cocoa yield and blackpod data, analysis were performed on square root transformed data using a blocked one-factorial at three levels. For cocoa bean size, the model used included the harvesttime as a subplot factor. Proportions were arc-sine transformed prior to analysis.Yields of cocoa were 358, 203, and 48 kg dry beans ha• 1 in the high, low, and zero spray treatments, respectively, in the first year of rehabilitation. In the second year, yields were generally much lower due to lower pod set early in the year, probably due to rainfall differences and this was a general feature in the area. Yields were 149, 104, and 7 kg dry beans ha• 1 in the high, low and zero spray treatments, respectively. In the first year, returns to capital were higher in the high application rate treatment whereas in the second year, returns were higher in the low application rate treatment. There was high variability between individual trees in both cherelle production and unaffected pod production. Fungicide treatments had no significant effect upon cocoa bean size, although individual bean mass was significantly greater at the final (December) harvest than at earlier harvests.Copper concentrations in cocoa beans were extremely low (13-17 ppm) and were not different between treatments.Topsoil (0-10 cm depth) was different between cocoa and secondary forest, with higher pH, higher exch. Mg and Cu in the cocoa (Table 36). In the 10--20 cm layer, exch. K concentration was lower in the cocoa.There were no significant differences in texture between forest and cocoa, however, the 10--20 cm layer had a higher clay content than the 0--10 cm layer. There were no significant differences between fungicide treatment plots therefore the data are not shown.While the forest had more total cast production in both years than the cocoa treatments, the year totals of the cocoa fungicide treatments were not significantly different from each other. Nutrient and carbon concentrations were generally higher in casts derived from the cocoa plots than casts in the forest. However, there were no effects of fungicide treatment upon any concentration measured. Cast:soil nutrient ratios were higher than one for all elements except Cu. Casts derived from the forest had a higher percentage of sand than those from the cocoa. Casts derived from the high fungicide application plots had a higher percentage clay than those derived from the low fungicide application and zero-spray treatments.The profitability of the spraying depends on the yield level and thus farmers are recommended to spray at the recommended rate in years when pod set is high and at the low rate -54- Forest (n -9) (0/0) (system) Forest (n = 9) (%) (system) in years with poor pod set. Furthermore, some trees did not produce, thus it is suggested to replace such trees. However, cherelle and pod production per tree are being monitored for a third year to test whether there are correlations between year to year production for each tree. No significant negative environmental consequences of fungicides were detected over the time frame of the experiment.Differences in soil pH and exch. Mg concentration between the forest and the cocoa may reflect either previous management and/or the initial land selection for cocoa establishment. The higher exch. eu concentration in the cocoa soil suggests a history of copper fungicide use, although the fields had been abandoned for the three previous years. Some of the difference in exch. eu is attributed to pH differences, as eu is more available at higher pH. Thus, differences in exch. eu concentrations between forest and cocoa may to some extent reflect pH dependent availability rather than real differences in eu amounts in the soil. However, eu concentrations were still low, with the highest eu concentration in the topsoil of 19.3 mg kgt.Relative to the forest system, casting levels ranged from 24 to 36% in the cocoa. This difference is similar to that reported for a comparison between forest and a food crop field after burning, tillage and cropping where cast production was 25% of the forest.There was no effect of fungicide treatment on earthworm cast production over the year and cast nutrient concentrations reflected initial soil nutrient concentrations. eu concentrations of casts were lower than eu concentrations in soil for the cocoa plots. This suggests that, unless the eu is being compartmentalized at the sub-cellular level, that earthworms are avoiding copper uptake. Earthworms could avoid copper uptake by feeding at deeper soil layers. Casts derived from the high fungicide application plots had a higher percentage of clay than those derived from the low fungicide application and zero-spray treatments. This suggests that the earthworms may be feeding more in the deeper soil layers where the clay content was higher (Table 36) to avoid the soil with higher Cu concentrations near the surface. Faced with declines in profits and labor productivity of cocoa, the majority of smallholder cocoa farmers are increasingly diversifying their income generation and food production activities. With the goal of diversifying land use systems and increasing incomes, farmers can either reconvert their plantations or enrich them by increasingly integrating forest species, fruit trees, and annuals within the plantation system. The particular dynamics of interest to us in this study is the diversification within the cocoa plantations. The important ecological, economic, and sociocultural dynamics that have lead and are leading to different types of cocoa agroforests need to be understood to better target research interventions. These multistrata systems deserve to be investigated as they are excellent models of association between non-domesticated forest species and cultivated forest species; between production of food, nuts and seeds, and other provision of environmental services in the forest ecology; and between sustainable management, flexibility, and household food security.The overall objectives of this study are to:1. Characterize the factors explaining the dynamic changes of cocoa multistrata agroforestry systems in the humid forest zone;2. Characterize the vegetation structure and composition of the evolving agroforestry systems and its environmental role;3. Characterize the management and production of the evolving agroforestry systems.The study is being conducted within the Forest Margin benchmark in southern Cameroon.The current report builds on reports already provided in 1999-2000 and focuses on the specific differences between the typology of cocoa agroforests presented in 1999. Three basic types had been identified based on the species composition of 60 agroforests in three different blocks (i.e., areas around Yaounde, Mbalmayo, and Ebolowa):Type A Plantations with a high density of oil palms and Musa species.Type B: Plantations with a high density of cocoa trees.Type C: Plantations with a high density of non• timber forest product and high-value timber speCIes.In 2002, building on previous work, we initiated in different cocoa agroforests a study to investigate (1) the productivity of the cocoa systems, and (2) the litter fall and its composition. Eight cocoa agroforests were identified: one Type A and one Type C each in Nkometou (Yaounde block) and Akok (Ebolowa block), one each of Types A, B, and -56-C in Awae (Mbalmayo block), and one \"full sun\" system (8) also in Awae. The \"full sun system\" was added to assess the role of shading on biomass dynamics in cocoa agroforests. Initial results from the period July to December 2002 are being presented for this progress report.During the 6•month period, between 4 and 5 tlha oflitter material was collected (Table 37). Across the benchmark area, leaves of associated trees constituted 66% of the total litter fall, that of twigs 19%, cocoa leaves 8%, fruits of associated trees 6%, and cocoa fruits less than 2%. There appeared to be a trend of greater total litter fall in the Yaounde block compared to Ebolowa (P = 0.0958). This difference was significant particularly in the leaf and cocoa fruit fractions. Although the proportion of leave fall of associated trees across the blocks was similar (about one•third), cocoa leaf fall in the Yaounde block constituted 14% of the total litter fall, while only 4% in Ebolowa. In contrast, the fall of fruits of associated trees and twigs was greater in Ebolowa.Evaluating litter fall by month, we observed that the greatest litter fall across all blocks was in December (Fig. 5). This coincides with the establishment of the dry season in the region. Greater litter fall was registered in the Yaounde and Mbalmayo blocks. The lower rates in Ebolowa appear to be associated with the usually more delayed on• set of the dry season in the southern part of the benchmark area.From July to December, nearly 5 tlha of litter fell in the shaded cocoa systems (A, B, and C), while only 2 tlha in the \"full sun\" cocoa system (8) (Table 38). This is primarily due to greater leaf fall from associated trees and greater twig fall. However, \"full sun\" cocoa system had significantly greater cocoa leaf fall and to a lesser extent greater cocoa fruit fall. Less than 10% ofthe total litter in the shaded systems came from cocoa leaves, while this was 72% in the \"full sun\" system. And the inverse was true for the proportion of the leaves from associated trees.The litter fall is greatest in all systems in December as the dry season establishes itself (Fig. 6). There appears however to be a greater increase in litter fall compared to the rainy season months particularly in Types A and 8, the fIrst being a shaded system with reduced shading compared to Band C, and the second being the \"full sun\" system. During the period July to December 2002, the total litter fall was similar in the different blocks of the benchmark area, although there were differences in the composition of the litter fall. The \"full sun\" cocoa system was distinct from the shaded systems in general. However, System A has some similarities to the \"full sun\" system, which is probably explained by the former having fewer large shade trees compared to Types Band C. There was also some indication of shaded systems being at least initially less severely affected by the on-set of the dry season. Oil palms are an integral component of nearly all the farming systems in the forest zone of southern Cameroon. Farmers have been utilizing the oil palm for oil production and palm wine tapping. Oil palms are not planted, but retained in home gardens and increasingly in the various food crop farms naturally.As pressure on the land increases and forests disappear, farmers have started showing mounting interest in establishing smallholder oil palm systems on already deforested land using improved varieties. This is particularly the case in the northern part of the Forest Margin Benchmark where population pressure is mounting (ca. 100 personslkm 2 in the rural areas) and adult forests do not dominate the landscape any more.For young male farmers in Nkometou, a research village in the northern part of the Benchmark, the development of oil palm systems is their number one priority and is also of interest to women and older men. Such systems, particularly in the non•traditional oil palm plantation areas as around Nkometou, could provide an alternative source of income to cocoa and coffee, which have for long been the most important cash crops of farmers of the zone. Unlike relatively large•scale plantations managed by parastatals, these oil palm systems are family managed and receive only low levels of external inputs with very limited technical assistance.The main objectives ofthis activity are to:• Develop sustainable oil palm systems on already deforested land for smallholder farmers, providing early income through intercropping with food crops.• Transfer the experience on the development of these systems primarily by farmers from two other locations where activities had been initiated in 1997.• Determine the preference of farmers for different management systems.-59-In 2001, the major farmer groups in Nkometou were approached and asked to identify representatives from their respective groups to participate in this activity. This approach was taken to ensure that the participating farmers fed their information back to nonparticipating farmers of their group. Finally 20 farmers were selected after ensuring that their households had enough land and labor for this additional enterprise. In a further set of meetings in Nkometou, farmer leaders from two other localities who have already been involved with UTA since 1997 in developing oil palm systems on deforested lands were brought in to share their experience. Some key observations of these farmers conveyed were:• The main limiting factor is labor during the establishment phase.• Size of a new plantation needs to be adjusted to the available household labor force.• Oil palms need to be physically protected against rodents for the first 2-3 years.• Intercropping with food crops in the fIrst one to two years is recommended since it helps to keep the fIelds clean of weeds. However, planting cassava should be avoided.• Mter cropping has stopped, a cover crop such as Pueraria phaseoloides should be planted to keep the natural vegetation down.• Fertilizers should be used as recommended.• Marketing and transformation opportunities need to be looked into early.The fields were cleared early in 2002 and the oil palm seedlings were planted during May and June 2002. A base fertilizer application was made to all seedlings in October. Each of the 20 fields received 36 plants with the intention that the farmers would be able to experiment with certain factors which were important to them. In the second half of 2002 a set of evaluations of the activities to that date was made and discussions held with the participating farmers. Some key observations follow:• Farmers were particularly keen on testing the role of fertilizers. It was perceived that fertilizers may give greater bunch yields, but that there may be greater loss due to fruit rots before the bunch harvest and that oil quality may be inferior.• Farmers indicated that fIeld preparation was done just before the start of the rainy season (FebruaryfMarch), but that waiting for the official recommended planting date for oil palms (May) necessitated an additional round of slashing just before planting. This happened during a period where labor was already scarce due to other operations on the farm.• Eleven farmers planted different short season crops between the rows of oil palms. They decided to do this to facilitate the weeding of the oil palm fields. Some of the others decided to plant food crops in a different field since they wanted to associate these crops with cassava, and thus decided that they preferred to slash any vegetation establishing in the oil palm fields.• At planting, only a minority of farmers had built protectors against rodent attack for their young palms, but they were ready to do this as soon as the palms had been planted.Observations will be continued jointly with the farmers in 2003.Establishing cocoa hybrids on degraded land in southern Cameroon AB forests become scarce, new ways of establishing cocoa farms on already deforested and possibly degraded land have to be devised. This requires investigating the best means of providing a protective environment for the young cocoa seedlings, improving the level of fertility of the degraded land, and selecting the varieties best adapted to these more severe establishment conditions. One of the farms was lost due to the farmer's decision to convert an adjacent forest into an oil palm plantation. The forest trees fell into the bush system destroying virtually all cocoa plants. This report is thus on the six remaining farms.Survival was affected by shade system with more plants alive under Musa shading (88%) than in the bush (82%, P = 0.098). Variety had no effect on survival, ranging from 81% in local and SNK to a maximum of 90% in hybrid # 4. In the Musa system, more flush leaves were found than in the bush system. All other growth parameters were unaffected by the shade system. With the decline of the plantains, the shading (or the lack of it) in the two systems is becoming more similar, eliminating differences found at earlier stages.The most important indicator of vigor, stem diameter, was larger in hybrids # 1, 3, and 4, than in the local material and SNK. Survival of the terminal bud was highest in the local material, yet this may well be caused by the fact that many plants had not formed a jorquette and therefore were still in a stage where the presence of a terminal bud was an advantage. Most hybrids had a jorquette and thus numerous side branches.Flower formation, although not usually an important parameter in December, was greater in hybrids # 1 and 3, significantly different form the local material. Fruit set was the high. est in hybrid # 3, significantly higher than in the local material and SNK.At the moment, hybrids # 1, 3, and 4 all appear superior to the local and SNK material. A final evaluation will be conducted in June 2003 and a decision made as to which hybrids to propagate. Data on cocoa quality need to be gathered in the forthcoming years to ensure the multiplication of cocoa with superior vigor and appropriate quality.Establishment of mixed tree crop systems on short fallow land by L.N. and S.H.In 1999, an on• farm, two• factorial trial, replicated nine times was established to assess the potential of mixed tree systems consisting of Persea americana Mill: Lauraceae (avocado),Dacryodes edulis (G. Don) H. J. Lam: Burseraceae (safoutier), Terminalia ivorensis A. Chev:Combretaceae (framire), Ricinodendron heudelotii (Baill.) Pierre: Euphorbiaceae (essessang) and Theobroma cacao L.: Sterculiacaeae (cocoa) to rehabilitate short-fallow land. The effects of different temporary shade crops and four fertilizer regimes were tested. We compared the following shade treatments which had different levels of labor investment, different potential profitabilities, and different risks of success.Four different shade treatments were tested: plantain (Musa spp. AAB); cooking banana (Musa spp. ABB); inga (Inga edulis Mart.: Leguminosae), and alleys of natural regrowth dominated by Chromolaena odorata King & Robinson:Asteraceae.Musa spp AAB cv. Essong (local plantain), a French type. This was the farmers' choice treatment and, given that plantain is the favored starch staple of urban populations in Cameroon (Dury et a1. 2002), there is a potential for a high economic return.Musa spp ABB cv. Fougamou (cooking banana). This is less susceptible than local plantain to root nematodes and Sigatoka, can have a higher survival and can, under southern Cameroonian conditions, continue to produce four or more bunches from the same mat (Hauser pers. obs). However, it is not widely grown in Cameroon, and thus has no established market price.Inga edulis Mart: Leguminosae: Mimosideae (inga) is an N .fixing tree. On a similar soil (Ultisol) in Costa Rica, 1. edulis had the highest nitrogenase activity of nine tested species (Tilki and Fisher 1998). The genus Inga originates from Latin America and is one of the most widely used shade trees in cocoa and coffee plantations. It is a multipurpose tree, producing an edible fruit and fuelwood. In Mrica, it is in Equatorial Guinea probably having been brought by the Spanish during colonial times, to provide shade in cocoa plantations. Its fruits there are found for sale in the capital. The tree is not known in Cameroon.Alleys of the natural regrowth. This was the 'low investment' and required the least labour to establish. Alleys of the fallow vegetation were left between the rows of cocoa to provide some shade. These were maintained by regularly slashing along the cocoa lines.Four inorganic fertilizer regimes were imposed: nil; 'N only' at 22 kg ha\"; 'P plus cations' P, K, Ca, and Mg at 11, 33, 367, and 73 kg ha• 1 ,respectively; and 'all' N, P, K, Ca, and Mg at 22, 11,33, 367, and 73 kg ha•\"respectively. All plots were planted in an identical pattern to fruit and timber tree seedlings.Growth oftimber and and fruit trees was assessed twice per year. Mter measurements on all components in May/June 2002, fields were reweeded in October and all system components were remeasured (height, girth, leaf numbers, etc.). In all years, shade treatment had no impact upon survival. By October 2002, growth was generally best in the plantain temporary shade treatment and fertilizer regime had no significant effects. Plantain is susceptible to root nematode pests and leaf diseases therefore it is prone to uprooting and can maintain fewer leaves than cooking banana. This treatment produced the least shade and, given that local plantain (AAB) has a poor performance relative to (ABB) cv. Fouga• mou, competition would be lower in these plots. By October 2002, survival of Terminalia iuorensis was 71% across treatments and trees averaged 245 em height. Stem diameter and branching were significantly higher in the plantain treatments and growth was worst in -62-the bush. However, green branch number was highest in the bush treatment, suggesting a developmental delay. By October 2002, growth of Ricinodendron heudelotii was generally unaffected by shade treatment although stem diameter was higher in plantain plots than in others.Of the shade treatments, rnga was thinned to 50% of the initial density and the cooking banana suckers were removed but one per stand. The thinning exercise was used to estimate the biomass ofthe Inga. This repeats the measurements conducted last year and thus gives yearly growth data and canopy development. It is concluded that the selected fruit trees have a negative initial response to shading and it might be more appropriate ifthey are planted before fast-growing components in such mixed systems.Evaluation One ofthe farms was lost due to the farmer's decision to convert adjacent forest into an oil palm plantation. The forest trees fell into the bush system destroying virtually all cocoa plants. This report is thus on the six remaining farms.Survival was affected by shade system with more plants alive under Musa shading (88%) than in bush (82%, P = 0.098). Varity had no effect on survival, ranging from 81% in local and SNK to a maximum of 90% in hybrid # 4. In the Musa system, more flush leaves were found than in the bush system. All other growth parameters were unaffected by the shade system. With the decline of the plantains, the shading (or the lack of it) in the two systems is becoming more similar, eliminating differences found at earlier stages.The most important indicator of vigor, stem diameter, was larger in hybrids # 1, 3, and 4, than in local material and SNK. Survival of the terminal bud was the highest in the local material, yet this may well be caused by the fact that many plants had not formed a jorquette and therefore were still in a stage where the presence of a terminal bud is an advantage. Most hybrids had a jorquette and thus numerous side branches.Flower formation, although not usually an important parameter in December, was greater in hybrids # 1 and 3, significantly different form the local materiaL Fruit set was the highest in hybrid # 3, significantly higher than in local material and SNK.At the moment, hybrids # 1, 3, and 4 all appear superior to local and SNK materiaL A final evaluation will be conducted in June 2003 and a decision made which hybrids will be propagated. Data on cocoa quality needs to be gathered in the forthcoming years to ensure the multiplication of cocoa with superior vigour and appropriate quality.-63- Farmers are unfamiliar with grain legumes such as cowpea and soybean, but are showing increasingly interest in their cultivation in the humid forest zone of southern Cameroon. Grain legumes produce not only edible grain for human consumption but also biomass that can be used for soil fertility restoration and weed controL However, soybean, an N•fixing legume, requires a large amount of P for its energy•consuming N,-fixation process and P is one of the major limiting nutrients for crop production in this zone. Given the limited access of most small farmers to fertilizer P, it is desirable to identify and incorporate into cropping systems soybean cultivars that can mobilize P from soil•P pools that are unavail• able to less P•efficient food crops.Fields and pot experiments were carried out at Minkoameyos and Abang village in 2001 and 2002. A factorial trial with 2 factors (soybean cultivar and P fertilizer application) was run in a split block design. Thirteen soybean cultivars and 3 levels ofP fertilizer application (0 kg P, 30 kg TSP, and 90 kg rock phosphate) were tested. Soybean was seeded at 5 by 75 cm with a density of 250 000 plants ha•'. The soil pH was 5.4 and the available P (Bray. 1) was 2.68 at 0•10cm. Biomass production, nodulation (weight and number of nodules), % AMF, root length, Nand P, and P use efficiency, and N fIxed by different soybean were determined at pod filling and at harvest. In this report only data on dry matter production, root length and phosphorus• use efficiency are presented.The F•test denoted a signifIcant effect of cultivars and P application on dry matter produc• tion of soybean cultivars. However the interaction effect between cultivars x P application was not signifIcant (p = 0.81). In extreme P defIcient condition, the high dry matter was produced by cultivars, Tgm 1511 (6.01 g plant•') and in high P supply, the higher dry matter production was obtained by the same cultivars Tgm 1511 (7.50 g plant•') following by the cultivars Tgm 1251 (7.10 g plant•') (Table 39).The total root length of soybean cultivars was signifIcantly different between the cultivars and P application (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.031 for cultivars and P application, respectively) (Table 40). The higher root length was produced by Tgm 1196, Tgm 1039, and Tgx 1465•2E whereas the lower root length was produced by the cultivars Tgm 1293, Tgm 1360, and Tgm 1420 (Table 40).RP: Togolese rock phosphate; TSP: Triple super phosphate; Means followed by the same letter are not signifIcantly different at P = 0.05.The P•use efficiency per em of root showed that cultivars Tgm 1419; Tgm 1360, and Tgm 1293 had the higher P•use efficiency than cultivars Tgx 1465; and Tgm 1039 where the P•use efficiency was two times lower than the P•efficient cultivars (Fig. 7).Table 39. Effect of phosphorus application on dry matter production and Puptake at Minkoameyos.------- The most important contribution of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungus (AMF) to crop growth is probably phosphorus uptake through the soil mycelium network. Numerous studies have shown the significant effect AMF in increasing the available P that plants can uptake. Surprisingly, very few data can say precisely which P fraction the fungus makes available to plants. Moreover, in the humid forest of southern Cameroon, no data exist on the number and infective propagules able to form AMF association with host plant.This study was developed from a need to assess the number of AMF infective propagules present in the humid forest soil of southern Cameroon and to determine the fractions of P which are made available to the plant by AMF association. The study was conducted in the Benchmark of southern Cameroon. Sites were selected according to their texture and low levels of available P (Bray 1). In each soil group, five representatives villages were selected and within each village, five fields (4 short fallow and one forest) were used for sampling of soil and aboveground biomass of the vegetation. Soil and plant root samples were sampled from September to December 2000. Soil was sampled at 0-5; 5--10, and 10-25 cm depths. At each sampling point, spores were recovered from 25 g of soils. Spores were then counted under a microscope at 40x magnification. The most probable number (MPN) technique was used to assess the infectivity of AMF in soil. A 10•fold dilution series was made in a screenhouse at Nkolbisson. Steamed soil was used to dilute the inocula. Two pregerminated seeds of cowpea and soybean were planted. The plants were supplied with nutrient solution for eight weeks after planting and harvested at 8 WAP. Values for the MPN were calculated from the number of infected pots by an approximation of the maximum likelihood method.Results obtained showed that the number of AMF spores was not significantly different between the five groups of soil fallow fields, although the number of spores was higher in Akonolinga and Sangmelima than in Ebolowa, Mbalmayo, and Yaounde soils (Fig. 8). No significant difference was observed between soil groups in the forest field. Contrary to the fallow fields, the highest number of spores was obtained in Akonolinga and Ebolowa soils.When comparing the number of spores according to type of vegetation (forest and fallow fields), the difference was significantly different (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 8).The number of spores and the number of AMF invectives propagules were not significantly different between the soil groups (Fig. 9). However significant differences were observed between vegetation types. The coefficient of correlation between soil P•fractions, the number of spore, and the number of infective propagules (Table 41) showed significant and positive relationships in terms of available P (Bray I), the number of invectives propagules (r = 0.59; P < 0.0001; n = 82), Pi.NaHCo 3 , the number of spores (r = 0.35; P < 0.0041; n = 64), Pi•HCI fractions, and the most probable number of AMF (r = 0.45; P < 0.0004; n = 64). The main objectives of this study were: (i) to obtain quantitative data of the phosphorus reserve in the strongly weathered soils of southern Cameroon, and (ii) to establish relationships between P fractions and soil genetic properties_ As detailed soil maps are largely missing for southern Cameroon and the Congo Basin, whereas geological maps are more often available, such information should enable us to locate soils with potential P problems.Five soil groups, termed according to their location as 'Ebolowa', 'Sangmelima', 'Yaounde', 'Akonolinga' and 'Mbalmayo' soils, were sampled. The parent material of these soil groups vary from granite (Ebolowa and Sangmelima), migmatite (yaounde), mica schist (Akonolinga), to schist (Mbalmayo). The soils derived from them belong to the udult and udox suborders. In each group, one representative profIle was described and sampled by genetic horizons. The profiles were located as far as possible on summits with slopes of less than 4%. AIl profIles were under fallow vegetation of less than 4 years at the time of sampling and were chosen such that no adjacent tree could interf. Soil samples were collected by genetic horizons.Four discrete P pools were determined by sequential extraction whereby alkali-soluble forms of phosphorous (0.5M NaHC0 3 and O.lM NaOH) with greater bioavailability were extracted fIrst, followed by less available, acid extractable ones. Residual P was extracted with 2M H 2 S0 4 after ignition at 550 'C. Total organic P within the solum was calculated as the sum of all the 4 fractions to a depth of 1.5 m, taking into account the P form and its concentration, soil bulk density, and horizon depth.The studied pedons differ in their morphological and biochemical properties. 'Sangmelima', 'Yaounde' and 'Akonolinga' soils are red (2.5 YR hue) in contrast to 'Mbalmayo' and 'Ebolowa' with yellow (10YR hue) surface color. Ultisols were morphologically more differentiated than soils derived from the various granites. Their silt/clay ratio, clay illuviation index, and ECEC were all indicative of soils at an advanced stage of weathering. The oxalate extractable, active Fe (Fe o ) ' was minimal in the soil surface, and reached a maximum in the upper part of the Bt horizon. Higher values of Fe o , (1.0-3.2 g k!5!) were observed in red soils (2.5 YR) compared to yellow (10 YR) soils (0.5-1.2 g kg'!). AI3+, exchangeable with 1 M KCI, was the dominant cation on the organo-mineral complex reaching saturation levels between 30 and 93% from 20 cm downwards.The total P reserve within 1.50 m depth ranged from 473 to 632 )lg g'! in granitic soils to 168-254)lg g-! in schist-derived soils ('Mbalmayo' and 'Akonolinga' soils). Labile P, as measured by the Bray-I method, ranged from 15.2 )lg !5! in surface horizons to almost zero in subsoils horizons. Soils from the 'Yaounde' group had higher values of all extracted fractions in the Ap horizon, reflecting recent fertilizer application. The bicarbonate (NaHCO,P) fraction represented between land 3% of tbe total P with higher values occurring in surface horiwns. The vertical pattern suggests that this pool is associated with short-term organic matter transformation processes, mediated by plant uptake. The NaOH-P pool represented between 6 and 27% of the total soil P reserve. Significantly higher values were observed in granitic soils and the 'Yaounde' soils. The highest values of NaOH-P occurred in illuvial horizons with higher amounts of Fe o ,'-69-Phosphorus response of maize (Zea mays L.) in relation to P fractions in three acid forest soils from southern Cameroon by C.N. in collaboration with M. Tchienkoua, M. Jemo, and P. Bilong Data on P.response of maize in dominant soils of southern Cameroon are scarce. The objec• tive of this study were: (i) to quantify P fractions and P•sorption characteristics of three major soil groups in southern Cameroon; (ii) to determine the response of maize to different levels of applied P; and (iii) to analyze the residual P in the soil system.A pot experiment was run as RCBD with soil type and P fertilizer rate as factors. Soil (0-10 cm) was collected from three villages (Mengomo, Minkoamayeos, and Abang) representing 3 ('Ebolowa', 'Yaounde', and 'Mbalmayo' soils, respectively) of the 5 soil groups studied. Soil material for the experiment was collected from fields under fallow. These fields were chosen on the basis oftheir P•Bray•I values of~ 3!, g g\". P was applied as SSP with 5 rates ranging from 0, 7.5, 15, 30, and 45 kg P ha• 1 • The test crop was maize CV. CMS 8704.Soil samples were sun•dried, passed through a 4 mm sieve, and distributed after thorough mixing in 60 pots. The applied P rate was corrected for mean bulk density of the soil at the time of sampling. Each pot contained 5 kg of soil, which was put to 80% of field capacity by daily watering with deionized water. Each pot received a basal application of 30 kg K ha• 1 in the form of Kieserite and N (30 ppm) in the form of urea. Five maize plants were sown and thinned to 4 soon after emergence. Crop parameters, such as plant height and diameter, shoot and root fresh and dry weight, were measured at 4 and 6 W AP. Shoot and root samples were oven•dried at 70°C. The P and Zn contents of each compartment were analyzed. Free and total Fe, Al, and P•sorption were also analyzed.Growth parameters (plant height and diameter) showed highly significant differences (P = 0.0001; Table 42) for soil type and P rate. Similarly yield components (shoot and root bio• mass) followed the same trend. The interaction term was significant at 7% root yield. A greater response to P was observed at Abang and Minkoameyos villages for plant height at 3 and 6 WAP, and diameter at 6 WAP. Maize growth parameters were generally lower on Mengomo soils. In Abang soils however, maize root biomass was less developed but produced similar or higher amount of aboveground biomass compared to Minkoameyos. This may point to higher P availability at Abang than Minkoameyos.Table 42. Mean values of some growth parameters and root/shoot ratio. Nitrogen has been identified as the most yield• limiting factor for maize in the Yaounde area whereas no significant yield response to phosphorus was observed. With maize production becoming more intensive in the urban and peri•urban area of Yaounde, where it is sold fresh or dry for income generation, resource• poor farmers hardly purchase N •mineral fertilizer for maize production. However, N can be supplemented to maize by using appropriate legume species grown as intercropping or relay cropping. Although, experiments in the region revealed no consistent effect of P on maize, P shows generally an effect on legumes.Objectives if this experiment are: (i) to identify the best legume species among cajanus, mucuna, soybean and cowpea for low external mineral N fertilizer input in an intensive maize production system; and (ii) to study the long•term P effect on maize yield.An experiment was established in four farmers' field at Nkometou (each farmers field constitutes a replicate) in March 2002. Treatment factors are maize cropping pattern (intercropping vs. sole cropping) and Prate (0 and 30 kg P ha• 1 ). A total of 16 treatments were randomly allocated to plots in each replicate. Cropping pattern treatments were as follows:(1) Maize intercropped during the first season with Cajanus, soybean, cowpea, or Mucuna, followed by Cajanus, cowpea, soybean, and Mucuna, respectively, during the second season;(2) Sole maize during the first season, followed by soybean, cowpea, Mucuna or natural fallow during the second season.In the first season, cajanus and maize were planted simultaneously, while soybean, cowpea, and Mucuna were planted 2, 4, and 8 weeks after maize, respectively. Maize was planted at 0.75 x 0.50 em (2 seedslhill), and Cajanus, soybean, cowpea, and Mucuna were sown between two maize rows. The distance between these legumes, planted 1 grainlhill within a row, were 0.30, 0.10, 0.20, and 0040 m, respectively. In the second season, soybean and cowpea were planted at 0.50 x 0.25 cm at a rate of 3 grainslhill for soybean and 2 grains! hill for cowpea. Crops varieties used were: CMS 8704 (maize), TGX 1805•13F (soybean), 'Asonteng' (a cowpea cv. from Ghana), and a local Cajanus variety from the Northwest province of Cameroon of 6-7 months growth period with red kernels.Maize grain yield, plants at harvest (PAR), ears at harvest (EAR), and haulms weight (HW) were not affected either by P or by intercropped legume species (Table 43). Although there was no significant difference between the two P levels for all the parameters measured, a slight effect of P was observed (Table 44).P did not affect intercropped soybean and cowpea yield during the first season. Both legumes yielded about 100 kg ha\" (data not presented). During the second season, residual P or previous sole or intercropped maize treatments did not affect soybean and cowpea yield. Soybean yielded 841 kg ha• 1 , which was significantly higher than the cowpea yield with 388 kg ha•'.-71- Groundnut is the common legume grown for household consumption in the humid forest zone of Cameroon. Farmers are increasingly showing interest in cultivating soybean, which is not a traditional legume grown in this region. Recent trials on selected villages have shown some promising soybean varieties. These varieties have not yet been tested on a large scale in farmers field. The objective of this activity was to identify the best performing soybean variety in farmers field.Three soybean varieties (TGX 1879-7F, TGX 1838-5E, and TGX 1805-13F) were distributed to agents of the national extension service (PNVRA) to be planted in farmers fields in a RCB design with a local variety as a check. A total of eight extension agents were involved with 80 and 60 farmers, respectively, during the first and second season of 2002. Out of these farmers, data were effectively recorded on 67 farmers fields during the first season and 58 during the second season.The analysis of variance showed significant differences in yield for all fixed effects (season, zone, variety) and their interactions (data not shown). Therefore, a separate analysis was done by season for each zone. Mean grain yields are presented in Table 45.During the first season, TGX 1879-7E grain yield was lower than that of other varieties except at Nkolfep (Table 45). This was mainly due to the poor seed germination of this variety. No variety consistently yielded better than the other varieties during the two seasons. Therefore, no clear recommendation on the variety to be proposed to farmers could be made. However, farmers expressed their preference for TGX 1805-13F because of its earliness and uniform maturation. Due to logistical problems, the biomass yield of the soybean varieties could not be determined. Note: Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P == 0.05) within zones in each season.Results from earlier trials indicated that the improved soybean varieties have higher biomass yield than the local variety_ This means that it can be recommended to farmers to change over to an improved soybean variety without loosing on grain yield while having a higher potential for soil conservation through increased biomass recycling. However, currently farmers uproot the whole plant and carry it to the village before stripping the pods. This technique does not allow farmers to benefit from the higher biomass recycling, because the biomass is usually not returned to the field. A recommendation to soybean breeders is therefore, to modify the plant characteristics such that easier pod harvesting on site would be possible.Cowpea germplasm screening in the humid forest margins of Cameroon Cowpea is a new crop in cropping systems of the humid zone in Cameroon. It is often assumed that cowpea is not adapted to the humid zone, because of pest pressure. In initial trials it was found, however, that cowpea gives good yields of about 1 Mg ha-I even without spraying. Cowpea, adapted to acid soils, is of interest to farmers because it fetches a relatively high price on the market (FCFA 400 kgl) and can serve as a substitute or addendum to the traditional groundnut, which usually yields little grain. Thus, we started a screening program in order to select varieties that could be recommended to farmers in the region.Twenty-four cultivars were tested in the fIrst season of 2001. Seventeen cultivars were retained after the fIrst season-14 improved from Ibadan, 1 improved from IRAD Bambui, and 2 local. These 17 cv's were tested in both seasons of 2001 and 2002 in two villages, Nkometou with soil pH of 5.5 to 6.5 and Akok with soil pH of 4.5 to 5.0. Spraying was a treatment factor with no or maximum spraying (2-3 as required for total suppression of insects). The experiment was run as split•block design with 4 replications per location. Determined were: grain and biomass yield, percentage rotten pods and seeds, nodulation, and shoot/root ratio. Only grain and biomass yield are reported here.The statistical analysis was done using a mixed model approach. Fixed factors were geno• type, season, treatment, and their interactions, whereas, random factors were year, loca• tion, and replication. Replication was nested within treatment (spraying) block and within year, location, and season.Genotype and season by genotype were the significant fIxed factors in terms of grain and biomass yield, indicating that both yields of some cowpea cultivars were influenced by seasonal factors. However, Asonten and MTA 22 were among the highest grain yielders in both seasons (Figs. 10 and 11).Grain and biomass yields of all cultivars were higher in the fIrst season than in the second season (exception cv. 22), on average by 34% and 78%, respectively, but the difference was not significant. The four highest yielding cultivars in the fIrst season were IT97K•556•4, IT98K•128•3, Asonten, and MTA 22, with grain yields ranging between 0.95 and 1.15 Mg ha• ' . The two highest yielding cultivars in the second season were Asonten and MTA 22 with grain yields of 0.89 and 0.79 Mg ha\", respectively. Spraying with Karate led on aver• age to 25% higher grain yields, but the difference was not significant. The biomass yields, however, were 10% less with spraying, but again the difference was not significant.The cultivar 97K•819•170 gave the highest dry biomass yield (1.85 Mg ha\") in the first season (Fig. 12), but it had also the lowest harvest index (0.16). The next highest biomass yields of 7 cvs. ranged from 1.03 to 1.23 Mg ha\" (Fig. 12) with harvest indices between 0.37 and 0.43. Dry biomass yields in the second season were considerably lower with 7 cvs. yielding between 0.57 and 0.80 Mg ha\" and with harvest indices between 0.43 and 0.50 (Fig. 13). The best grain and biomass yields in the fIrst season were obtained with cvs. IT97K-556•4 and IT98K-128•3 and cvs. Asonten and MTA 22 in the second season. ;::.,. ... \"f N ... ~ 'l' 0 C N i ., '\" '\" '\" '\" ;;; '\" '\" '? 0 '\" ... J!! N '\" N i '\" '\" ., ... ..,. ., N ;;; N ~ ., a, c g \"I ;;: \"I ;;: \"f \"I ...'\" '\" ;;;; '\" ;;;; 0 ;;;; 15000 accessions) at UTA; 133 yam accessions were added to the in vitro genebank; and the Bambara groundnut collection (1169 accessions) was rejuvenated.• Genetic variation in Ugandan banana cv. Sukai Ndizi and the genetic diversity in EastAfrican highland bananas and their putative ancestors was established with DNA markers.• Studies on the genetics of resistance to the cassava mosaic disease (CMD) in Mrican cassava landraces showed that the additive gene effect was more important in predicting progeny performance. Data from F1 progenies suggest polygenic inheritance of the trait.• Analysis, through inductively coupled plasma spectrophotometry (ICP), of kernels from 240 early maturing varieties of maize grown at three sites showed variation in iron (16.9-20.7 mglkg) and zinc (18.5-21.2 mg/kg) contents. Environmental, varietal, and variety x environment interaction effects were highly significant.• Inherita nce wa s elucidated for cowpea seed characteris tics, pla nt pigmenta tion, flow er color, pod color, photosensitivity, and r esistance to Ascochyta blight.• Multivariate statistical ana lysis of 56 quantitative and qualitative agrobotanical traits of 504 Mrican landraces a nd 398 improved cultivars of cassava identified 12 cluster groups for the African landraces a nd nine for the improved germ plasm. Twenty-two clusters were formed from the joint clustering of the African landraces and improved cassava germplasm.• Molecular markers were identified for important traits, e.g., DNA markers associated with quantitative trait loci (QTL) for resistance to the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) (one of the QTL accounted for up to 76% ofthe variation for this trait); SSR marker associated with resistance to CMD in cassava (accounting for 57.41% of the total phenotypic variation for the trait); SSR and AFLP markers associated with QTL affecting Striga damage symptom rating and maize yield under Striga infestation; QTL for resistance to flower bud thrips were detected at five regiops of the cowpea genome that explained 76% of the variation for the trait.• RAPD markers for resistance to virus (white yam) and anthracnose (water yam) and genetic linkage maps for white and water yams were published.• Cowpea gene flow studies showed outcrossing (0.021 %) 10 m from the marker line.• New sources of several important traits were identified, e.g., root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resistance in soybean; resistance to black sigatoka in the Musa cultivar Kikundi; pulp color, bunch characteristics, and nematode resistance in Musa germplasm from Papua New Guinea; resistance to major diseases, grain quality, and tolerance to specific abiotic stresses in cowpea; resistance to root rot in cassava;resistance to root knot and yam nematodes in Dioscorea dumetorum; tuber quality in white and water yams; drought tolerance, high p-carotene content and vitamin A equivalent, and resistance to Striga and Aspergillus flauus in maize.• Improvement of broad-based and special trait populations continued for all mandate crops.• Seeds were delivered for international trials: e.g., 63 sets of regional uniform variety trials (RUVT) of maize and 41 ofthe regional Striga variety trials (early and extra-early maturity) to partners of WECAMAN; and 409 sets of cowpea trials to 105 partners in 24 countries. Based on results of 200 1 RlNTs, 120 kg of seed of selected maize varieties were also delivered to NARS partners on request.• UTA's Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) was inaugurated and a workshop was organized for would-be-members of national biosafety committees from five countries in West Africa.• Several postgraduate students conducted thesis research on the mandate crops in germplasm management and crop improvement.• Mild strains of the pandemic-associated cassava mosaic virus, EACMV -U g , were shown to provide a cross-protective effect against superinfection by severe strains of the same VIrus.• Some 30 highland bananas and 20 plantain hybrids with improved resistance against the nematode Radopholus similis have been identified.• The importance of organic mulching (particularly using the weed Tithonia) in improving crop production and suppressing nematode damage has been demonstrated in field trials.• Aflatoxin management packages allowed a 30% reduction of aflatoxin contamination compared with traditional maize production practices in Benin and Togo.• The occurrence and spread of the gray leaf spot pathogen Cercospora maydis on experimental and farmers' maize fields in Plateau State and at Mokwa, Nigeria, was confirmed. Similarly, widespread occurrence of soybean rust has been confirmed in IITA•lbadan farm.• Samples of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae were found to be highly virulent to the cowpea bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus) in small experimental stores and also to laboratory populations of the pod bug (Clauigralla tomentosicollis) leading to complete control of these pests.• The industrial production of Green Muscle ™ (recently rated by FAa as environmentally safe and causing low risk to humans) against locusts and grasshoppers in West Africa has been demonstrated to be economically feasible at a price competitive with synthetic pesticides, and in Niger, farmers have started buying it in large quantities.• Studies on the interactions between cassava cultivars and the exotic phytoseiid predator Typhlodromalus aripo in a range of agroecologies indicated that the predator's preference for cassava cultivars with large hairy apices is widespread. In greenhouse studies, T. aripo produced up to four times more offspring when exudates were available, boosting biological control of cassava green mite.• Where T. aripo has persisted for two or more years in the field, cassava green mite abundance has declined substantially and cassava yields have increased by between 15 and 45%, and at times, by up to 85% on varieties susceptible to cassava green mite damage and favorable for the predatory mites.• Mango mealybug and spiralling whitefly infestations (checked in Benin, Burkina Faso, and Cote d'Ivoire) were again generally low with a dry season peak particularly in big cities. In all samples, all exotic parasitoid species were common.• The exotic thrips parasitoid Cera nisus femoratus was recently recovered 390 km north of the original experimental release site in southern Benin, 1 Y, years after the initial release, indicating faster spread than anticipated.• The SP-IPM pilot site farmers gained 20% increase in maize yields by integrating. resistant varieties with habitat management against Striga and stemborers in Kenya; reduced Striga emergence by 63% by integrating resistant varieties and cropping patterns in northern Nigeria; and resuscitated faba bean production in Egypt and Morocco through resistant varieties and improved agronomic practices against Orobanche.• Over 70% of vegetable consumers in Ghana and Benin are aware of potentia1 health risks linked to the misuse of pesticides and are willing to pay up to 60% of the premium price for organic vegetables, whereas vegetable farmers are willing to pay 30-60% of the premium price for new biopesticides, which could increase expected incomes by at least 10% while decreasing health hazards and environment pollution.• A total of 41 peer-reviewed journal articles and book chapters were published in 2002 by the 18 \"core\" project scientists.• A research paper relating aflatoxin exposure to impaired child growth was published in the prestigious British Medical Journal.• Faunistic surveys conducted in various ecological regions of Benin, Cameroon, Ghana, Nigeria, and Togo led to the preservation of more than 20 000 new specimens and' enabled us to update the UTA insect reference collection with 1000 newly identified speCIes.Impact, policy, and system analysis• The impact of globalization on Mrican agriculture shows that a few countries experienced a positive real growth in gross domestic product in the last two decades. Highly competitive global markets and increases in the production of raw products led to about a 76% decline in commodity prices. Some of the interventions for African agriculture to become competitive and to benefit more from globalization are strengthening the capacity of countries in trade negotiations, stimulating the production of added-value products, diversifying exports, improving access to information technology, and increasing regional trade.• The analysis of the urban food demand structure in the dry savanna of Nigeria shows that rice (imported and local) represents about 65% of the household expenditure for cereals, followed by maize (20%), sorghum (9%), and millet (6%). Cross-price elasticities indicate that maize is a substitute for sorghum and rice.• The spatial and economic analysis of the fresh cassava supply in Yaounde identified 15 urban markets where the product is being sold and 65 villages supplying the four main markets. Most of the villages are located within a traveling distance of 2-3 hours. These villages will be the major sites for further research and development actions.• Aflatoxin contamination was detected in 99% of the serum samples from 200 children aged 18 to 36 months in Benin Republic. The contamination was higher in the southern Guinea savanna than in the coastal savanna. It increases from February to November in both zones. Contamination was also found in the samples of white maize, a staple in the study area. Stunting of children, 40% on average, was higher in the aflatoxin high exposure zone than in the low exposure zone.• The potential is high for the use ofbiopesticides for vegetable production because both producers (about 80% of 372 respondents in Ghana and Benin) and consumers (70% of 220) are aware of the health risk from chemical pesticides. Farmers are willing to pay b~tween 30 and 60% more as the price premium for yield increases of between 10 and ~%. Consumers are willing to pay 50% more as a price premium for cabbage and tomato free from chemical residues.• A new scheme of small farmers' groups of between 5 and 10 people is proving successful in the four pilot states of the RUSEP project in Nigeria. About 4300 farmers belong to 550 groups linked up with private seed companies, 960 with banking institutions, and 860 with tractor-hiring services for sustainable access to modern agricultural inputs. Similarly, RUSEP is facilitating the supply of raw materials by farmers' groups to agro-industries worth about USD 2.7 million. This amounts to about a 20% increase in farmers' income and a 15% reduction in cost for the agro-industries.• FOOD NET continues to improve the market information systems in Uganda, including 2-3 broadcasts/week, and the use of a local SMS service provider to enable text messaging for 17 commodity prices to be available via mobile phone_ Similarly, RUSEP is facilitating the broadcast of market information on 20 agricultural commodities in Nigeria through local radio and a website.• About 100 entrepreneurs benefited from training on agroenterprise and product development in Nigeria and Uganda.understanding of their market opportunities and challenges on both a territorial and commodity-specific hasis.• Tools for monitoring and evaluating the business performance of processing equipment manufacturers have been developed with banks and microcredit institutions to assist in the scaling-out process. In western Kenya, five processing units have been installed and tested to enhance and develop the income generating potential of cassava, and transform fresh roots into stable, market-grade, intermediate products.• SARRNET brokered the involvement of an additional 20 industries within the SADC region in commercial cassava production and utilization from a base number of less than 4 in 1990. This has increased the industrial utilization of cassava from 8166 t in 2001 to 11 700 t in 2002. Farmers' associations have been established in pilot production and processing centers and linked to industrial users in Malawi (3) and Tanzania (2).A cassava business center has heen created in Tanzania while a \"Cassava Task Force\" was inaugurated in Malawi.• Typhlodromalus aripo is confirmed estahlished since its release hetween 1995 and 1998 across different agroecologies in Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. Impact surveys indicate a reduction in CGM populations with a 15-40% increase in storage root yields. The CMD pandemic was newly reported from two districts of northwestern Tanzania and large areas of DR Congo and Republic of Congo.A coordinated \"Plan of Action\" for research for development on CBSD was developed hy the principal stakeholders.• Large shoot tips and compact and hairy apices are major determining factors for suitability to T. aripo. No interaction was observed between CGM infestation and CMD infections at Kumi, Uganda, where CGM densities are very high. T. aripo did not discriminate against varieties infected by CMD with similar numbersltip recorded on MH 95/0414 (resistant to CMD, slightly tolerant to CGM) and Ebwanatereka (susceptible to both CGM and CMD).• A spreadsheet, accessible at http://www.iita.orglinfo/soilmass.zip, was developed using more precise methods than previously published to simplify determination of soil nutrient stocks.• A competitive production cost was estimated for cassava to be obtained from 25 to 30 tlha with an economic return of about US$800 to US$1000Iha.• Field and feed trials were initiated with commercial feed millers in Malawi and Tanzania to develop and validate feed production systems for poultry, pigs, and cattle. Crude protein levels of cassava leaves (fresh, dried) were 2 to 3 times higher than other fodder crops (fresh and dried alfalfa, napier hay, and brachiara). Application of chicken manure on the cassava variety Kiroba, planted at 33 000 plantslha yielded the highest amount of silage. Variety Silira also had the highest yields in Malawi at similar densities. A 30% increase in milk production was recorded from dairy cattle fed on cassava silage in Malawi and Tanzania.• The functional quality characteristics of 832 elite genotypes for potential end-uses were assessed and cassava starches specifically compared favorably with corn starches. Genotype MM96/0161 produced the highest quantity of gari per unit area estimated at 11.8 t garilha equivalent to US$6820Iha.oThe economic analysis oflegume fallow for soil fertility maintenance in yam productionshows that intercropping yams with Gliricidia sepium is economically viable with a marginal rate of return of about seven from a survey of 153 farmers in Benin Republic. Similarly, 65% of 631 survey farmers in Nigeria applied inorganic fertilizer to yam. The intensity of fertilizer application was higher for male farmers, those with large holdings, and those who crop for sale.o Farmers' requests for seeds of herbaceous legumes shows a sharp increase after only three years in eight villages of the derived savanna in Benin Republic (times 2.2) and northern Guinea savanna in Nigeria (times 7.6). The main driver is livestock feed for Nigeria and soil fertility improvement for Benin Republic.oThe profile of an ideal yam variety to guide breeding activities was constructed from an ex•ante adoption study on a sample of 1347 respondents located in the yam belt of Benin, Cote d'l voire, Ghana, Nigeria. and Togo. Results from Nigeria (631 respondents), as an example, show differences in users' preferences for yam attributes for the three major identified yam products: pounded yam, boiled yam, and amala. o High adoption rates of lIT A technologies were recorded in the dry savannas of Nigeria. IITA maize (largely varieties Oba Super 1 and 2) was found in nine out of ten villages and accounted for more than 45% of the maize planted. Results for soybean (largely TGX1019•2EN and TGXI448•3E) were eight often villages and 44% of area. Six years ago, soybean was mentioned in only two villages. Results for cowpea (largely IT93K452•1 and IT90K277•2) were six often villages and 26% of area. In the forest zone of Cameroon, new cassava from UTA (largely 8034 and 8017) was grown in 64% of area planted to this crop from a sample of 320 households.o A user• friendly procedure for annual project planning and management was developed and is available in the form of a CD• ROM. The procedure is based on a multicriteria scoring approach that UTA is developing for a more transparent and structured system for setting priorities within the Institute .. o Two international workshops were successfully organized, one in collaboration with the World Bank and the second with the CGIAR Systemwide Initiative on Malaria and Agriculture.Starchy and grain staples in Eastern and Southern Africa o Ninety stakeholders participated in a regional workshop to develop strategies for transforming the cassava subsector to assure food security, income generation, and economic growth in East, Central, and Southern Africa. Participants identified opportunities within the food, feed, and industrial sectors with varying potentials across countries. Demand for feed was estimated at 535 000, 500 000, and 18 750 t in Madagascar, Kenya, and Uganda, respectively. Constraints to industrial transformation included policy, grades and standards, marketing system, volume, prices, supply, production, processing and storage technologies, credit, market information and intelligence, and the need for a private•sector•led championship lobby group.o FOODNET conducted market studies (46) that aimed to assist research institutes, international NGOs, governments, donors, and private•sector clients to gain a better time, 10 improved plantain hybrids and five banana hybrids were distributed to 60 farming communities via farmer participatory demonstration plots located in those communities.• Thermal (hot water and boiling water) treatments out yielded the control, ash-coating (traditional), and nematicide (carbofuran) application. Paring in combination with thermal treatment had no positive effect, thus the labor-intensive paring can be regarded as unnecessary if suckers are treated with hot water (20 minutes at 52 GC) or submerged for 30 seconds in boiling water.• Diagnostic surveys of cassava in western regions of the Democratic Republic of Congo and central and northern Republic of Congo showed cassava mosaic disease to be the most widespread and damaging production constraint with more than 70% of all plants diseased, severe symptoms predominant, and mixed virus infections frequent. To tackle the expanding CMD pandemic, a multifaceted CMD management program was initiated in the Republic of Congo, and included the field establishment of >100 elite CMDresistant clones, hot spot evaluation of 17 \"rescued\" IITA varieties, training of Congolese researchers in cassava plant health management techniques, and the establishment of a national stakeholder network for cassava research for development.• It has been clearly established that P and K are the primary limiting nutrients for cassava production on the structurally stable terre de barre soils of southern Benin and Togo. In three years of continuous cropping, cassava yields were maintained above 20 tfha with NPK and 18 tlha with PK while unamended yields fell to 13 tlha.• Participatory evaluation of several improved cassava varieties in the forest margin benchmark of Cameroon was completed with the best three varieties retained for mass multiplication and distribution to farming communities.• Populations of Dioscorea rotundata developed for high yield and pest resistance formed the basis for identification of superior new clones by partners in each of the five major yam-producing countries of West Africa (Benin, Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, and Togo). New clones of Diose ore a alata selected for high tuber yield and food quality as well as anthracnose resistance were delivered to, and evaluated on-station with partners in Nigeria (18 clones) and Cote d'l voire (36 clones). Selections from earlier introductions are under on-farm evaluation with farmers in Cote d'lvoire.• At least 95% of producers in surveyed zones would consider improved yam varieties for adoption in Cote dT voire, Ghana, and Togo. For these varieties having desirable characteristics, most farmers in Cote d'Ivoire and Ghana, as opposed to Togo, are willing to pay more than the current market price of local yams.• Nine-month legume fallows produced between 1.3 and 2.0 times more maize grain than the natural fallow in southern Cameroon, with maize grain yields being around 4 Mgf ha after the best legume fallows, such as Cajanu8, Mucuna, and Pueraria. P fertilizer application increased the maize grain yield further in combination with some but not all legumes. N fertilizer application (70 kg Nlha) after natural fallow gave higher though comparable grain yields (4.5 Mglha).• GIS and market survey tools were used successfully to identify the supply system in Yaounde for fresh cassava roots. The supply system is fragmented and most of • Open quarantine facilities have permitted exchange of over 3800 improved clones to eight countries significantly reducing the cost of establishing cassava using tissue culture material, shortening the time for evaluation to release of varieties and providing an efficient regional solution for the CMD pandemic. The participatory on•farm evaluation involving NGOs, farmer groups, extension services of the Ministry of Agriculture, and church organizations has permitted farmers to apply their own criteria to identify suitable varieties and enriched the diversification of improved varieties in farmers' fields and proved essential in meeting the diverse food and other needs of households.• Kikundi, a male sterile but female fertile cultivar, is being used as a new resistance source for black sigatoka in banana germplasm development. Landraces of Papua New Guinea with good variations in pulp color, bunch characteristics, and resistance to Radopholus similis were identified. There are strong indications of different pathotypes among R. similis populations in Uganda. Tithonia mulch improves initial EARB (cv. Mbwazirume) development, crop production, and suppression of nematode damage.• Pratylenchus sudanensis has been demonstrated to be pathogenic on yams in Uganda, though varietal differences exist in response to it. Monoxenic cultures of Pratylenchus sudanensis have been established using carrot discs.• Sampling methods for banana weevil were improved through the use of damage to the central cylinder, which is the key parameter in banana weevil yield loss assessment.The positive effect of crop sanitation on weevil pest status (reduced weevil densities and damage) was demonstrated on-farm. Semiochemicals aggregate banana weevil while the ant Pheidole sp. predates on banana weevil immatures thereby reducing weevil damage. Searches for natural enemies in Indonesia revealed several new predators but no parasitoids for either eggs or larvae.• Training courses were conducted on marketing, agroenterprise development, market information, statistical analysis, and CGM management using different approaches including learning alliance, field days, and farmer field schools. Ten partners participated in an agroprocessing study tour in Vietnam, hosted by the Vietnamese Postharvest Technology Institute.Diverse agricultural systems in the humid zone of West and Central Africa• In order to facilitate distribution of improved plantain and banana hybrids to farmers, six pilot multiplication centers were established in collaboration with four public extension agencies and two nongovernmental companies in Nigeria. Similarly, three multiplication centers were established in Ghana. At least 500 farmers received training in rapid plant multiplication techniques and pre and postharvest management of plantain through farmers' field days held at five locations in Nigeria. At the same 120 kg Nlha (the maize yields ranged fromL4 to 2.1 t/ha). However, a supplementary application of 40 kg Plha, 29 kg Calha, 25kg Mglha, and 26 kg Slha in the form ofTSP and Epsom salts (9.9% Mg, 12.7%S), the same N treatments showed a highly significant response (the maize yields ranged from 2.2 t/ha to 5.12 tlha) suggesting that these degraded soils are not only deficient in N but also deficient in P, Ca, Mg, and S.• A participatory on-farm fertility trial in the northern Guinea savanna showed that maize yields were similar (about 3.5 tlha) with 136 N + 20 P + 37 K kglha (mineral fertilizers) and with 86 N + 9 P + 17K kglha (mineral fertilizers) + 6 tlha animal manure.However, in the same fields, soybean yielded about 3 tlha without any fertilizer. Also, the residual effect of soybean on maize in the following year was equal to 6 t of animal manure. The results indicate the importance of cereal-legume rotation and crop-livestock integration in reducing the need for mineral fertilizers and efficient management of natural resources.• Several high yielding maize varieties were developed combining drought tolerance and Striga resistance and ability to perform well under low fertility (30 kgfha). Some of the promising varieties are TZE COMP 3 DT, ACR94 TZE COMP-5W, TZE COMPI C5, DTSRW-CO, and LN PC3. A total of 113 open-pollinated variety trials, 63 hybrid trials, and 24 inbred line trials were distributed to various countries on request.• A number of early, medium, and late maturing soybean varieties were developed combining high_ grain and stover yields with good nodulation, enhanced nitrogen fixation, and low shattering. The most promising varieties were TGX 1910-11F (early), TGX 1905-2F (medium), and TGX 1910-8 (late) with about 2 tlha grain and 2 to 3 tlha stover yields. Forty-two sets of soybean international trials involving 20 improved varieties were sent to 36 collaborators in 21 countries on request.• A range of improved grain and dual-purpose cowpea varieties were developed with combined resistance to major diseases, insectpests, and Striga for the northern Guinea savanna, (NGS) Sudan savanna (SS), and the Sahel. The most promising varieties were IT97K-568-18, IT97K-499-35, IT99K-573-1, and ITOOK-1260 for NGS; IT98D-1399, IT98K-409-5, IT98K-491-4, and IT97K-499-39 for SS, and IT97K-568-18, IT98D-1399, IT98K-131-1, and ITOOK-1205 for the Sahel. A total of 409 sets of cowpea international trials involving 140 improved varieties were sent to 105 collaborators in 24 countries.• The results of an IPM trial to control cowpea insects at Minjibir (Nigeria) representing the Sudan savanna showed some beneficial effect of soap and neem leaf but much less compared to the synthetic insecticide .The mean grain yield of the improved cowpea variety IT90K-277-2 was 361 kglha without insecticide spray; 516 kglha with soap spray; 509 kgfha with neem leaf (extract) spray; 1352 kgfha with two sprays of synthetic insecticide spray, and 2430 kglha with three sprays of synthetic insecticide sprays.• It was demonstrated for the first time that stem exudates of cowpea, maize, and soybean can stimulate better germination of Striga hermonthica seeds than root exudates. It was further shown that cowpea varieties caused 42 to 70% germination of S. hermonthica compared to 24 to 36% germination by soybean varieties. Cowpea variety IT94K-440-3 was the best, causing 70% germination and TGX1844-18E soybean variety caused 36% germination.the supplying villages are located within 2-3 hours travel distance. Transport costs represent about 30% of the consumer price. The carriers complain about bad road conditions, harassment by police, and the lack of space to unload the commodities in the urban markets.• Farmers organizations associated with the Sustainable Tree Crops Program have been able to increase the prices they receive for cocoa by 10-15% through organized sales in Cameroon, Cote d'Ivoire, and Nigeria.• Recommended application rates of fungicide appear to be necessary to maintain cocoa yields against black pod disease in southern Cameroon. Regarding trade-offs between ecological sustainability criteria, there was no significant advantage of reducing fungicide rates on earthworms, the major \"ecosystem engineer\" in the system. However, relative to the forest system, casting levels ranged from 24 to 36% in the cocoa farm.• Two years after a farmers' organization was established in Akok villagefsouthern Cameroon and a farmer-managed credit system set up around the cocoa crop, farmers are actively seeking new income generating opportunities and diversifying their agricultural base.• A participatory mapping approach was developed that allows, through an interactive process of mapping and reiterated validations, the local communities in southern Cameroon to get familiar with the ordinary geographic representation. They are then able to sketch on a georeferenced base map land use, clan and lineage lands, hunting areas, etc. This will provide new insights into the management of landscapes by local communities.• A study of natural fallows in southern Cameroon revealed that farmers identified a total of 174 useful plant species, from which about 58% were collected in fallows of less than 10 years old. This demonstrates the importance of short fallow systems as a reservoir of forest product species and their significance in the socioeconomic and cultural lives of rural communities, particularly in landscapes where forests are rapidly disappearing.• Prototype CamFlores model running was tested to improve understanding of interactions between farmers and land, and to evaluate the effects on productivity, livelihoods, and landscape sustainability of interventions in farming systems; modified and expanded to simulate one real forest margin benchmark village in Cameroon. The model has demonstrated the critical role of labor availability in food production, as well as the need to model interhousehold cooperation.• A new user-friendly version of LEXSYS (Herbaceous Legume Expert System) has been made available on the internet (ftp:ffftp.bangor.ac.uk/pubfdepartmentsfaflLEXSYSf) through collaboration with the University of Wales at Bangor's School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences.Improving and intensifying cereal-legume systems in the moist and dry savannas of West and Central Africa• In degraded soils of Shika farm (Zaria, Nigeria) representing the northern Guinea savanna, maize yields did not show any significant response to nitrogen from 30 to• A weed control experiment in maize revealed that a new herbicide, \"Nicosulfuron\", was very effective in controlling weeds at a low dose of 35 g a.i.lha. The mean maize grain yield in the control plot was 968 kglha and the herbicide treated plot (35 g a.i.) yielded 3070 kglha compared to 2800 kglha in the hand-weeded (weed-free) plot. The grain yields in plots treated with the higher doses (70, 105, 210, and 420 g a.iIha )of the herbicide did not differ significantly from 35g a.i.lha.• The farmer participatory evaluation ofthe IITAJILRIIICRISAT improved crop-livestock system was very successful and the number of participating farmers was increased from about 50 in 2001 to 160 farmers in 2002 in Nigeria, using the special project support from DANIDA and Gatsby. Also, the project will now cover Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mali, Niger, and Nigeria from 2003. A series of stakeholders' meetings were held to develop the work plans and field days were held to show the trials to farmers, policymakers, scientists, NGOs, and extension workers.• The farmer-to-farmer diffusion of improved cowpea variety IT90K-277-2, which started in Kano State (Nigeria) in1997 through GTZ assistance, covered 140 primary farmers and 27 375 secondary farmers in 2002 who together produced a total of 578 065 kg of seed. This project will be extended to other states in 2003 through a special grant from USAID.• The project made a significant contribution in training and capacity building ofNARS.Over 60 PhD and MSc students conducted their thesis research in 2002 under the supervision of Project F scientists. ","tokenCount":"33311"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0010880008.json b/data/part_1/0010880008.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1005757b44e07afc179d638d4f75d6de77b6a554 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0010880008.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ac66f223172c36e7725aa8adf18c6e6b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/c80afbb5-c030-47f7-a3d1-cc326f2023c2/retrieve","id":"489323714"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"44bf0635-456f-4e6d-bf81-d1d05e599da5","pagecount":"10","content":"In 2010, Myanmar re-entered the global scene after 22 years of isolation (Jones, 2014;ADB, 2014). Since then, the country has been changing at a rapid pace as a result of ongoing political and economic reforms (Kattelus et al. 2014;IISS, 2011;International Crisis Group, 2012). These reforms are opening new opportunities for Myanmar and foreign investors and international donors have lined up to take part in Myanmar's transformation, resulting in steady economic growth 1 . One area of especially rapid growth is the hydropower sector, which is driven by high-energy demands in the region and is increasing pressure on Myanmar's water resources (IEA, 2015;Kattelus et al. 2014).While Myanmar boasts an abundance of water resources, spatial and temporal distribution is highly uneven, resulting in water scarcity and desertification in the central dry-zone, floods and salinization issues in the Ayeyarwady Delta and flash floods in the North and Western parts of Myanmar. Deforestation due to illegal logging causes erosion and sedimentation in rivers and reservoirs, the former causing problems for navigation. Myanmar's climate is strongly influenced by the Indian Monsoon circulation (Taft and Evers, 2016). Variability and a change in patterns such as intensification of pre-monsoon tropical cyclones, early termination of monsoons, the increase in average rainfall in most areas and a declining trend in other areas are expected to aggravate flood events and drought periods (Wang et al. 2013;Shrestha and Aung Ye Htut, 2016).Water management in Myanmar is scattered across ministries and departments resulting in an overlap of responsibilities in some sectors, while others remain neglected (OECD, 2014). Gaps in institutional resources affect Myanmar's capacity to implement and enforce effective laws and regulations (SEI, 2015). Water resources are managed ad hoc, with no clear long-term planning and the hierarchical structure of ministries and departments results in little or no cooperation or policy integration. Decisions have to move up and down the hierarchical ladder resulting in delays in planning and implementation (Myanmar government official, personal communication, February 2016).In the National Water Policy adopted in 2014, the government called for an Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) approach to face these and future problems that will arise as a direct result of the country's development (Myanmar National Water Policy, 2014). IWRM can be defined as \"a process that promotes the co-ordinated development and management of water, land and related resources to maximize the resultant economic and social welfare in an equitable manner without compromising the sustainability of vital ecosystems\" (GWP, 2009). How this concept is understood in Myanmar and what principles of IWRM are considered important is not yet clear.As part of the CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems in the Greater Mekong, researchers proposed a framework consisting of four constructs considered important parameters that can indicate the extent of IWRM implementation in a river basin: policy integration, public participation, gender inclusion, and adaptivity. The Q-methodology was used to identify perceptions among stakeholders comprising 31 participants from union, regional, and local governments, NGOs, academics, and the private sector. Four distinguishing viewpoints and narratives emerged. Results showed that institutional arrangements and mechanisms for public participation require greater attention for successful implementation of IWRM in Myanmar.An important principle of the participatory approach to development is the incorporation of local people's knowledge into program planning (Cooke and Kothari, 2001). Participation is expected to enhance the effectiveness of water resources management (Özerol and Newig, 2008), and to involve and empower local communities. Critical scholars, such as Cleaver (1999:608) suggest that \"participation has been translated into a managerial exercise based on 'toolboxes' of procedures and techniques\" and to achieve the intrinsic value of participation, appropriate techniques are needed to ensure real involvement in decision-making. Fung (2006:66) states that appropriate techniques or \"mechanisms for public participation vary along three important dimensions: who participates, how participants communicate with one another and make decisions together, and how discussions are linked with policy or public action\". These are questions that need to be addressed to find successful mechanisms for Myanmar, where a governance system with space for participation has been absent for decades and where participation is not a matter of course.In 2014, the World Bank granted a loan of USD 100 million to the Myanmar government for the implementation of the Ayeyarwady Integrated River Basin Management Project (AIRBMP). The project aims to strengthen integrated, climate resilient water management in the Ayeyarwady River Basin through a multi-phased approach (AIRBMP, 2014). This project provides the opportunity for Myanmar to manage its water resources according to IWRM principles. In line with the adoption of the IWRMbased national water policy by the Myanmar government, a national water law is in preparation and Myanmar now has to determine what they value and understand as 'good' IWRM practice to translate policy into nation-wide practical plans.The WLE research project examined perceptions of four constructs underlying IWRM, policy integration, public participation, gender inclusion, and adaptivity among people responsible for the implementation of future water management plans in Myanmar.The assumption is that perceptions of these constructs are an indication of how likely it is that IWRM principles will be adopted in water management plans. Policy integration is expected to be challenging in a context where rigid hierarchical structures are the norm (UNDP, 2015) and effective public participation is expected to pose challenges. With regards to compliance with Goal 6.5 of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDGs), Akkerman et al. (2015) recognize that practical approaches on how to measure the extent to which water management plans follow principles of IWRM are rare.The Q-methodology is a mixed-method approach for the systematic study of beliefs, and attitudes (Work et al. 2015: Brown, 1993;Van Exel and De Graaf, 2005). Based on quantitative factor analysis, the Q-methodology does not require a large sample (Raadgever et al. 2008;Watts and Stenner, 2005) and involves the analyses of ranked statements (the Q-set) about IWRM onto a grid according to a quasi-normal distribution. To identify perceptions, semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight Myanmar officials working in the water sector at national and local level along with an examination of government reports, policies, reports from NGOs and international development and financial institutions. Initially, 87 statements were developed of which 41 formed the final Q-set. The sample was composed of 12 national government officials, three regional government officials, two local government officials, four academics, six NGOs and four participants from the private sector. Approximately half the sample were women.Q-sorting of the 87 statements started with a short introduction to the research topic, an explanation of the procedure and the assurance of anonymity. The participants then received cards with the statements, which they classified as agree, disagree or neutral. The statements are then arranged from 'strongly agree' to 'strongly disagree. The exercise concluded with an interview to explore participants' reasons for their distribution.The complete analysis (Van Dorp et al., n.d.) provides detail on viewpoints regarding the four constructs (policy integration, public participation, gender inclusion, and adaptivity). Of particular interest is the consensus among the participants on 13 statements. For example, one statement is related to policy integration: \"Data should only be available for the ministries and departments, not to the public\", was strongly rejected by all four viewpoints. Reasons mentioned by participants included statements such as: \"A country is composed of people and the government so data should not be only for the government. It has to be shared with the public. They have the right\" and \"We cannot make any research without data. \"There was also consensus on statements regarding public participation (e.g. \"Local people know the local water system and should therefore be consulted\"). Reasons given included \"In the delta area, people know when the tide will come and the water level increases. They know more than us sometimes\" and \"In the past, if the government does a project they never do public consultation. The public does not know what is planned and people cannot express their feelings because they are not consulted. They have no choice. In the future, this must change\".The consensus statements on gender reflect different viewpoints, some negative (\"Women are too busy to manage the household and should not be burdened with water management decisions\") and some more promising (\"Women and men have same chances and in Myanmar women can participate in the water management sector so they are not excluded. There isn't any rule for women to be excluded from water management\").Consensus statements indicate an awareness of potential impacts of climate change and land use changes (\"Sometimes we cannot pump groundwater for drinking water supply, I think that is due to climate change; climate change adaptations in livelihoods is part of our projects for five years. I see that there are more organizations getting involved: deforestation, urbanization and mining are important land use changes in Myanmar. There is a lot of sedimentation in the river due to mining and deforestation, and also pollution from mercury. We have to dredge a lot because of that\").Other positive signs are that participants believed that ministries should work together to reduce climate change impacts, a general consensus that planning should cover more than 10 years in the future, all water management plans should incorporate climate change scenarios, and government should inform citizens more about possible climate change impacts.The detailed analysis of viewpoint by factor (A to D) and construct is provided by Van Dorp et al. (n.d.).Further study is needed to understand perceptions of IWRM throughout all states and regions, with specific attention to ethnic minorities. Because the Q-methodology uses a small-sample size, a different method might be better suited, such as focus group discussions and structured interviews. The statements did not cover transboundary issues, which, from a current Union perspective, are minimally addressed. With increasing federalization of the country, however, transboundary issues will become of more importance in Myanmar.Policy integration and cooperation within and between ministries is limited, resulting in long decision-making processes, inefficiencies, and delays in the implementation of plans. With the new government, however, participants expect this to change quickly. The present organizational culture characterized by segregated departments and ministries makes it challenging for projects such as the Ayeyarwady Integrated River Basin Management Project (AIRBMP) to adopt IWRM principles. An important aspect is the absence of data-sharing between ministries. Making policies with insufficient or unreliable data is already difficult, let alone integrating policies when information is not shared.There are discussions about whether the Ayeyarwady River Basin should have a river basin organisation, or whether a new ministry should be established for natural resources management. These institutional arrangements are important aspects of IWRM. Participants believe that regional governments should have more responsibility for decision-making. Increasing responsibilities would also change the hierarchical structure that is widely seen as an obstacle to integration. In addition, there is an urgent need for expert knowledge and capacity building. Cooperation between ministries and sharing knowledge is one key aspect of policy integration. Most government officials with water management tasks are engineers. Considering possible impacts on fish populations or local livelihoods as a result of closing off a tributary is not necessarily something they are trained to include in their calculations. Whether a more holistic approach advocated by IWRM can be successful depends to a large extent on cooperation between ministries and departments and, most of all, the sharing of knowledge and data. The results of this study show a consensus on the need to involve citizens in water management decisions. Questions remain about who should participate, and how outcomes are linked with policy or public action.The results related to gender inclusion show that women did not feel excluded from decision-making. Participants agreed with the statement that \"the man is head of the household\", suggesting that while Myanmar has a traditional family structure, men are not perceived as being more capable of making water management decisions than women. Some participants who confirmed that while women are excluded when it comes to higher positions in government, within the family they are equal.Policy integration and public participation are perceived as the two topics with the widest divergence of viewpoints among the four constructs. Seven of the 13 Q-set consensus statements concern adaptivity, suggesting this construct is perceived similarly among the participants. Statements regarding adaptivity systematically scored high, indicating that it is believed to be an important part of water management in Myanmar. All plans should incorporate climate change scenarios and the government has a major responsibility to inform its citizens about possible climate change impacts.Four distinct 'viewpoints' and related narratives were identified as part of the Q-methodology. Those holding Viewpoint One have strong beliefs about policy integration and believe that decision-making power should be more equally divided among government levels, and that only full cooperation will lead to effective and sustainable water management. Those expressing Viewpoint Two believe that decentralization is important for IWRM and emphasize the importance of the role that women play in water management. Viewpoint Three holders believe that public participation is empowering for vulnerable groups, although they also have strong opinions about gender equality. Viewpoint Four distinguishes itself from the others through the belief that future land use change is more important than climate change. People who hold this viewpoint believes this topic as important for future water management in Myanmar. Climate change receives a lot of attention, which can be partly attributed to donors' focus on climate change.The findings suggest that Myanmar water professionals are open to aspects of the IWRM approach to water management, with special interest in policy integration and cooperation and public participation. Ongoing projects such as the Ayeyarwady Integrated River Basin Management Project will provide further knowledge on the extent these ambitions can be implemented, given the current organizational structure in the water sector as well as limited experience with public participation.","tokenCount":"2274"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0012049669.json b/data/part_1/0012049669.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f7320f970fffad7399d6e5d178d5deade9738960 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0012049669.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"eeb45ffad9ef6a7d7e9a36766072f80f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/242e4f78-9c0e-4591-b266-abbd49714155/retrieve","id":"-1854297490"},"keywords":["Planning","training workshops","facilitation"],"sieverID":"0a2f59ad-f9ab-4443-a6bd-907990d18846","pagecount":"4","content":"Cover Field visits helped participants complete the process, providing a lot of information I was there with two other members of the PROMER project in Mozambique: like all other participants, we brought a \"success story\" with us. Following what we were told before the meeting, we were ready to \"learn how to align and refine a text.\" We had not realised that the purpose of the workshop was to learn about an approach that can help us avoid future mistakes. Perhaps if we had known, we'd have raised other questions.We were sure that we had completed what we had to do, until the tables that the facilitators shared forced us to look at what had gone wrong in our project. Guided by their step-by-step explanations, we started to focus on what had really happened -and soon saw that the tables were showing something rather different from what we had in our original texts. When we first started writing we did not consider everything we saw in the field, we never got beyond the positive things. So we left our texts aside and started new onessomehow feeling that we had wasted some time.The objectives of a capitalization process, and the materials that participants had to bring along were unclear; most participants (or their superiors) understood different things. And the first four days did not help to clarify it completely. The documents we got describing the methodology contained words that generated confusion. We could have escaped these misconceptions by avoiding terms like \"success stories\". Looking back, we should have given this workshop a different name. In a capitalization process we analyse what was planned and went well, together with all those steps which were planned and did not have positive results, leading to lessons that can be used in the future. This is why I think that words like \"learning\" and \"sharing\" should have been highlighted.Finding the time to write between the two workshops was an enormous challenge as we are all under a heavy work pressure. Some of the participants thought that it could have been better to start working individually, converting the tables we had all filled in into a first draft text during the first workshop. I have no answer to this; all I have are some scenarios to consider. But I do think that it would have been very useful for us to try to do this before the end of the first week -either individually or working in groups -and then to start the second workshop with the same exercise. We could have done this in the same way as we worked at the end of our second workshop in Maputo, when we had a \"conversation round\" which was very effective. Between the two workshops, participants could have looked for more information and improved the first drafts we made.The planning process of a new capitalization exercise should start by looking in detail at the exercise we just completed. Now, if I am to reconstruct our participation in the experience capitalization workshop in Maputo, I have to start by saying that during the first few days it was very difficult to see what we were doing, or to see what we had to do.When I came back from the workshop, I had the opportunity to share the capitalization tools we got with my colleagues at the Monitoring & Evaluation department, and also with and some technicians. These tools have made it easier for us to write \"success stories\" (all our quarterly and annual reports must include at least one of them), but to do it in a better way. We used to do it in an ambiguous way, with no structure ... but by using the tables that the facilitators recommended we are able to position ourselves, focusing on what is it that we want to do, why do we want to do it, who do we want to include -and who will be the readers of each story. The different examples that we brought from the workshop and that we shared with our colleagues really helped the whole staff to understand and to learn.Equipped with this knowledge, we promoted an \"exchange of experiences\" session between members of a cooperative of traders that had seen a lot of success in facilitating marketing links, and other traders outside the programme. These traders have serious problems with some foreigner merchants, who buy directly from the producers on their own farm. Very often, these small players work with large companies, but work without a government license. The problem is that they distort the market. Sometimes the maize has not even dried yet and they are already trying to buy it -for great discomfort of the large traders who want a long-lasting and more efficient relationship with the communities.At the same time, it may be worth considering having a five-day workshop to fit all this, or it could also be good to reduce the theoretical presentations during a four-day programme. In my view, the learning process would be more efficient if one would start with one of the cases brought to the workshop, linking the presentations made by the facilitators to it in a better way.But we can also look at the specific sessions. The individual talks we all had with the facilitators (in what we called both \"the kitchen\" or \"the bar\"), helped us to focus on our case, and to formulate the key ideas that made it worth sharing. On the other hand, the \"campfire\" session was also very useful, as it brought everybody together. This was the moment when the facilitators encouraged us to share our own ideas, and when we learned about the other projects/ programmes that were being capitalised. I am sure that this interaction made us all ready for a future exchange of ideas and information: the ice was broken.A very positive aspect of the whole process was that the facilitators were Portuguese speakers -the participants were unanimous about it. Most workshops -where large resources are invested, like in this one -are offered in English. But in English, this workshop would have never had the same impact. Since it was in our own language, we are already disseminating the lessons we drew.Facilitation has to start long before the workshop, whereas at the workshop we create together a new body of knowledge -and political impact.this mandate. The space to manoeuvre for our team is limited, as it seeks information, evaluates it and then delivers to those who have the decision-making power. Playing on less favourable outcomes is quite sensitive.Only managers can decide how they want to get the information and to whom it should be sent: dissemination as such has both a technical and a political cost. Therefore, the selection of the case to be analysed should also be taken by the project managers. This is not to say that they would be on their own. We need to include those who know what was planned at the project level, what went well, and what went wrong. But in the end, it is the project managers who have to make sure that the capitalization seeds fall in fertile soils.We recorded together how they were operating before, and how the cooperative regained control of the market. It was a practical adaptation of the capitalization tables. Both my colleagues and myself realised that to speak exclusively of one aspect at a time has a strategic, persuasive effect. The traders \"saw\" that they have had marketing problems, and recognised how, with the support of the government, they were able to work together and overcome these difficulties. Now we are already working on a report of this experience. We hope that a district manager, or perhaps someone working for the government, will read our report and realise that the situation has been controlled and that this is an approach which is worth repeating.Our own \"experiment\" with the capitalization approach showed another important point to consider when starting and facilitating such a process: the choice of participants. For me, an experience capitalization process should be run by the project coordinators, or by those who are responsible for the management of the programmes that they have to disseminate later. A monitoring officer does not have Edson Natha works in Nampula, Mozambique, for PROMER, Programa de Promoção de Mercados Rurais. His article, \"Alfabetização funcional\", was published in Portuguese in 2018. E-mail: nathaedson@yahoo.com Above At first \"it was difficult to see what we had to do\". Now \"we are disseminating the lessons we drew\"","tokenCount":"1419"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0015663248.json b/data/part_1/0015663248.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..549709e2d10a591af2158bd9749a593fabc8f3da --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0015663248.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"10d9435d0bc0c2e0d17f7eb526027a59","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/c01f32b7-5153-47ba-be5a-3182afa2ba2e/content","id":"1590229616"},"keywords":["Ethiopia","wheats","varieties","home economics","socioeconomic environment","plant production","production factors","credit","crop management","fertilizer application","technology transfer","innovation adoption","economic analysis","research policies","extension activities","highlands AGRIS category codes: E14 Development Economics and Policies","E16 Production Economics CIMMYT Dewey decimal classification: 338.162"],"sieverID":"221ecfad-8885-4caf-a9e8-acc18f378ca6","pagecount":"36","content":"At the time this paper was drafted, Hugo Verkuijl was an associate scientist at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Wilfred Mwangi is a principal economist with CIMMYT and also Director of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya. Douglas Tanner is an agronomist with CIMMYT, also based in Ethiopia. The views expressed in this paper are the authors' and do not necessarily reflect policies of their respective institutions.Wheat is one of the major cereal crops grown in Ethiopia. In sub-Saharan Africa, Ethiopia ranks second to South Africa in terms of total wheat area and production. In Ethiopia, wheat ranks fourth in total cultivated area and production. Despite the significant area of wheat production in the country, the mean national wheat yield (1.3 t/ ha) is 24% below the mean yield for Africa and 48% below the global mean yield. This relatively low mean national yield may be partially attributed to the low level of adoption of improved wheat production technologies.Hence, the objectives of this study were to: assess farmers' current wheat management practices, determine the technical and socioeconomic factors affecting the adoption of wheat technologies, and draw implications for research, extension and policy.Since its inception in 1966, the Institute of Agricultural Research (IAR, now renamed Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO)) of Ethiopia has released a number of high yielding wheat varieties and recommended associated crop management practices. The wheat technologies promoted in Adaba and Dodola woredas included improved wheat varieties (ET-13, HAR-710, HAR-1685, andHAR-1709), fertilizer types and rates (100 kg/ha DAP and 100 kg/ha urea as a blanket recommendation), and weed control practices (hand weeding, 1.0 l/ha U-46 for control of broadleaf weeds).Adopters of improved varieties were younger, more educated, and had larger families and farms. Also, adopters hired more labor and owned more livestock. Nonadopters appeared to have more off-farm income than adopters, but this difference was not significant. There were no significant differences between adopters and nonadopters in terms of the number of farm implements owned (e.g., hand hoes, ox-plows, or oxen carts).During 1997, about 42% of farmers in the study area planted improved wheat varieties. About half of the adopters grew Kubsa (=HAR-1685) or Wabe (=HAR-710). For the adopters, about 65% of their total wheat area was allocated to improved wheat varieties. In Adaba, about 34% of farmers planted improved wheat varieties compared to 48% of farmers in Dodola. Moreover, the mean area under improved wheat varieties was significantly larger in Dodola (0.5 ha) than in Adaba (0.2 ha). Pavon-76 was the most popular variety, preferred by 35% of adopters and 43% of nonadopters. The next most popular variety was Kubsa, which was preferred by 28% and 20% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively. Farmers identified the following varietal traits as important: high yield, resistance to sprouting and lodging, seed color and size, and baking qualities. The main constraint to adopting improved wheat varieties was the high price of seed.Most of the adopters (55%) began land preparation in March, while the nonadopters (48%) began preparation in February. More than 80% of farmers in both groups planted wheat in June. Average seed rates were 185 kg/ha and 178 kg/ha for adopters and nonadopters, respectively, which were higher than the recommended rate of 150-175 kg/ha. Farmers preferred a higher seed rate to compensate for low soil fertility and to compete with weed infestations.Wheat and barley received priority for fertilizer application by 98% and 88% of adopters and 80% and 82% of the nonadopters, respectively. Significantly more adopters (95%) applied chemical fertilizer than nonadopters (75%). Adopters applied about 88 kg/ha of DAP and 81 kg/ha of urea, while nonadopters applied about 78 kg/ha of DAP and 60 kg/ha of urea; however, average fertilizer rates for both groups were below the recommended rate of 100 kg/ha DAP and 100 kg/ha urea. The main constraint to fertilizer use for both groups was its high price. Crop rotation and fallowing were two other important soil fertility management practices.According to both farmer groups, broadleaf and grassy weeds were equally important in their wheat fields.Farmers controlled weeds by hand weeding or herbicide application. About 95% and 87% of adopters controlled weeds by hand weeding and herbicides, respectively, while 93% and 61% of nonadopters used hand weeding or herbicides, respectively. According to 75% of farmers, the most problematic weed that was not controlled by existing weed control measures in wheat fields was Snowdenia polystachya. The most important diseases were \"leaf rust\" (Puccinia striiformis) and \"stem rust\" (P. graminis), while cut worms, wild animals, and army worms were the most important pests. None of the farmers attempted to control diseases and only 9% of adopters and none of the nonadopters practiced pest control. The main reason for not controlling diseases and pests was a lack of knowledge of appropriate control measures.Farmers obtained formal credit through the agricultural development offices of their respective woredas in the form of farm inputs (fertilizer, improved seed, and herbicides). About 85% of adopters and 60% of nonadopters had access to credit for the purchase of fertilizer, while 48% and 9% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively, had access to credit for the purchase of improved seed. The main credit constraints for both groups were high interest rates and a lack of cash for the required 25% down payment. All adopters and 99% of nonadopters had received an extension visit. Other sources of agricultural information were farmer field days, training courses, and broadcast radio messages.The age of the farmer, the use of credit, and several varietal characteristics preferred by farmers (disease and lodging resistance and baking quality) significantly influenced the area allocated to improved wheat varieties. The marginal effect of the farmer's age on the area under improved wheat varieties was -0.01, and farmer's age decreased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by 1.5%. The marginal effect of the use of credit on improved wheat area was 0.59, and credit increased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by 84.3%. The marginal effect of disease preference on improved wheat area was 0.32, and the probability of adoption among nonadopters increased by 45.2% if the varieties were perceived to be more disease resistant. However, the marginal effect of baking quality on improved wheat area was -0.21, and the probability of adoption among nonadopters decreased by 29.9%. Lodging resistance was the third significant varietal characteristic preferred by farmers. The marginal effect of lodging resistance on improved wheat area was 0.31, while the probability of adoption among nonadopters increased by 44.2%. The farmer's total wheat area, number of livestock, and the use of hired labor and credit significantly influenced the amount of fertilizer used. The marginal effect of a farmer's total wheat area on the mean amount of fertilizer used was -0.08, and wheat area decreased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by only 0.3%. The marginal effect of hired labor on the amount of fertilizer used was 0.25; the corresponding increase in the probability of adoption among nonadopters was 1.0%. The marginal effect of the number of livestock (TLU) owned on the amount of fertilizer used was 0.01, and TLU increased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by 0.04%. The marginal effect of credit on the amount of fertilizer used was 0.80, and credit increased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by only 3.2%.Both adopters (50%) and nonadopters (53%) preferred Pavon-76, which suggests that it has traits important to farmers that should be considered in national and regional wheat breeding programs. In particular, the perceived resistance to disease and lodging of the improved wheat varieties were traits that positively influenced their adoption. However, the perceived bread baking quality negatively influenced the adoption of improved wheat seed.Hence, this trait should be given a higher priority by wheat breeding programs.The tobit analysis revealed that access to credit is an important factor affecting a farmer's decision to adopt improved wheat technologies. Credit in kind not only relaxes the cash constraint currently existing in most farming communities, but also facilitates the availability of inputs to farmers. Therefore, credit in the form of improved seed and fertilizer should be made available to all wheat farmers. Hired labor was also found to positively influence the adoption of improved fertilizer practices. This highlights the importance of developing labor-saving wheat production technologies to offset the cost of hired labor and expand the adoption of N fertilizer.Livestock ownership was an important factor which influenced the adoption of fertilizer. Livestock ownership is one means for farmers to minimize the risks associated with crop failure. Livestock represent the main cash source for financing crop production. Wheat is one of the major cereal crops grown in Ethiopia. In sub-Saharan Africa, Ethiopia ranks second to South Africa in terms of total wheat area and production. In Ethiopia, wheat ranks fourth in total crop area and production. It is grown in the highlands at altitudes ranging from 1500 to 3000 masl, situated between 6-16 o N and 35-42 o E; however, the most suitable agroecological zones for wheat production fall between 1900 and 2700 masl (Hailu Gebremariam 1991). Major wheat production areas are located in the Arsi, Bale, Shewa, Ilubabor, Western Harerghe, Sidamo, Tigray, Northern Gonder, and Gojam regions (Figure 1).Export of Ethiopian wheat flour increased until the late 1940s. After this period, due to growing domestic demand for wheat, wheat exports declined. Between 1944 and 1952, Ethiopia exported 697,652 tons of cereals and pulses with a total value of 120.7 million Birr (7 Birr = 1 US$); however, since 1957, Ethiopia has become a net grain importer. Between 1961 and 1997, total wheat area increased from 364,000 to 1,450,000 ha, while total wheat production increased from 255,000 t to 1.980,000 t. Mean grain yield increased from 0.7 t/ha in 1961 to 1.4 t/ha in 1997 (Hailu Gebremariam 1991;CSA 1997a;Payne et al. 1996). Despite the growth in wheat area and total production, Ethiopia continues to be a net wheat importer. Despite the significant area of wheat production in Ethiopia, the mean national wheat yield of 1.3 t/ ha is 24% below the mean yield for Africa and 48% below the global mean yield (Gavian and Gemechu 1996). This relatively low figure may be partially attributed to the low level of adoption of improved wheat production technologies. Hence, the objectives of this study were to assess farmers' current wheat management practices, determine the technical and socioeconomic factors affecting the adoption of wheat technologies, and draw implications for research, extension, and policy.The study area is situated in the southeastern highlands of Ethiopia-an area known for its high production potential for crops and livestock. A multi-stage purposive sampling procedure with a stratified random sampling method was used to identify the sample units (i.e., the farmers). First, peasant associations (PAs) were purposively selected based on their potential for wheat production and accessibility to vehicles. Then, members of each PA were stratified in two groups based on the gender of the household head. A systematic random sampling technique was applied within each stratum to obtain a sample of 144 farmers, consisting of 108 male and 36 female heads of households. Primary data formed the core of the study and were obtained from farmers using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed through an informal farming system survey that provided qualitative data on farmers' practices and circumstances. Information obtained through the survey was supplemented by secondary data from Woreda Agricultural Development Offices (WADOs) and informal interactions with extension staff.The questionnaire was administered from October 1997 to January 1998.Factors influencing the adoption of new agricultural technologies can be divided into three major categories: 1) farm and farmers' associated attributes; 2) attributes associated with the technology (Adesina and Zinnah 1992;Misra et al. 1993); and 3) the farming objective (CIMMYT 1988). Factors in the first category include the farmer's education level, age, and family and farm size. The second category varies with the type of technology, e.g., the characteristics a farmer prefers in an improved wheat variety, such as high yield, disease resistance, quality of the grain for bread making, resistance to lodging, and maturity. The third category includes the influence of different farm strategies, such as commercial versus subsistence farming, on the adoption of technologies.For this study, a tobit model was used to test the factors affecting the mean proportion of land allocated to improved wheat varieties or the amount of fertilizer (N kg/ha) used. A tobit model (McDonald and Moffitt 1980;Maddala 1983) that tests the factors affecting the incidence and intensity of adoption can be specified as follows:where: Y t = the proportion of land (ha) allocated to improved wheat varieties or the amount of fertilizer (N kg/ha) at a given stimulus level X t ; N = number of observations; X t = vector of independent variables; β = vector of unknown coefficients; U t = independently distributed error term assumed to be normal with zero mean and constant variance σ 2 .X t β is the index reflecting the combined effect of the independent X variables that inhibit or promote adoption. For the current study, the index level X t β was specified as follows:where: β 0 = constant;X 1 = WHEAT (area under wheat, ha); X 2 = AGE (age of the household head, yr); X 3 = EDUC (education level of household head, dummy variable); X 4 = LABOR (family labor, number of adults per household); X 5 = HLABOR (hired labor, dummy variable); X 6 = CREDIT (credit obtained by farmer for improved varieties or fertilizer, dummy variable); X 7 = TLU: Tropical livestock units (index where livestock numbers are aggregated using the following weighting factors: oxen and cows = 1.0, goats = 0.08, sheep = 0.08); X 8 = EXTEN (farmer received extension visit, dummy variable); X 9 = GENDER (sex of the household head, dummy variable); X 10 = DISEASE (farmer prefers the variety to be free of diseases, dummy variable); X 11 = BREADTST (farmer prefers the baking quality of the grain in bread; dummy variable); X 12 = LODGING (farmer prefers the variety to resist lodging; dummy variable);Formation of the model was influenced by a number of working hypotheses. It was hypothesized that a farmer's decision to adopt or reject a new technology at any time is influenced by the combined (simultaneous) effect of a number of factors related to the farmer's objectives and constraints (CIMMYT 1993). The following variables were hypothesized to influence the allocation of land to improved wheat varieties or the amount of fertilizer used.The amount of wheat area (X 1 ) is an indicator of wealth and can perhaps serve as a proxy for social status and influence within a community. It is expected to be positively associated with the decision to adopt improved wheat technology. However, a small area allocated to wheat could conceivably encourage farmers to intensify their production practices. In this case, larger farm size would be negatively related to the adoption of improved wheat technology.Farmer's age: Farmers' age (X 2 ) can either generate or erode confidence in new technology. In other words, with more experience, a farmer can become more or less risk-averse when judging new technology. This variable could thus have a positive or negative effect on a farmer's decision to adopt improved wheat technology.Education: Education (X 3 ) could increase the farmer's ability to obtain, process and use information relevant to the adoption of improved wheat technology. Education is thus thought to increase the probability that a farmer will adopt improved wheat technology.Household size: Large households will be able to provide the labor that might be required to implement improved wheat technologies. Thus, household size (X 4 ) is expected to increase the probability of the adoption of improved wheat technologies.Hired labor: Similarly, access to hired labor (X 5 ) is expected to be positively related to the adoption of improved wheat technologies.Credit: Farmers who have access to credit can minimize their financial constraints and therefore buy inputs more readily. Thus, it is expected that access to credit (X 6 ) increases the probability of adopting improved wheat technologies.Livestock: Ownership of livestock (X 7 ) is expected to positively influence the adoption of improved wheat technologies.Extension: Agricultural extension services provided by the OADB are the major source of agricultural information in the study area. It is hypothesized that contact with extension workers (X 8 ) will increase a farmer's likelihood of adopting improved wheat technologies.The gender of the household head (X 9 ) can positively or negatively influence the adoption of improved wheat technologies.Disease resistance: Farmers are expected to prefer wheat varieties that are disease resistant (X 10 ).The perceived quality of the grain for bread making (X 11 ) is expected to affect the adoption of improved wheat varieties.Resistance to lodging: Farmers are expected to prefer wheat varieties that are resistant to lodging (X 12 ). For example, the improved wheat varieties Kubsa and Wabe are relatively short-statured and are therefore more resistant to lodging; this is expected to have a positive effect on the adoption of these improved wheat varieties.The demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the adopters and the nonadopters of improved wheat varieties are shown in Table 2. About 69% of the adopters live in Dodola, while 33% live in Adaba. Most adopters (85%) were male. These differences in location and gender were significant at p<0.1. Most adopters (73.3%) and nonadopters (65.4%) were Muslim, while about 27% of adopters and 33% of nonadopters were Orthodox Christian. About 75% of adopters were literate compared to 56% of nonadopters (χ 2 = 3.6; p<0.1). The adopters (41.8 years) were significantly younger than the nonadopters (47.7 years) (t=2.2; p<0.05). Adopters had larger families (9 persons) than nonadopters (7.6 persons) (t=1.9; p<0.1). The average number of permanent workers did not differ between adopters (2.4) and nonadopters (2.3). There was also no difference between the average number of part-time workers hired by adopters (2.2) and nonadopters (2.4).About 66% of adopters hired labor compared to 49% of nonadopters (p<0.1); however, nonadopters hired labor for 26 person-days/year compared to 24 person-days/year for adopters (NS). The average wage for hired labor was significantly higher for nonadopters (4.9 Birr/day) compared to adopters (4.4 Birr/day) (t=1.9; p<0.1). The majority of adopters and nonadopters hired labor for wheat and barley production (Table 2), most of which was used during harvesting and weeding. About 57% of adopters and 50% of nonadopters reported that hired labor was readily available. This difference was not significant. For both groups, the main activities for men within the household were land preparation, planting, fertilizer application, and harvesting (Table 3). Women and children were mainly involved in weeding, threshing, and grain storage.The main source of income for adopters (96.7%) and nonadopters (97.5%) was the sale of farm produce. Off-farm activities provided another important source of income for adopters (36.7%) and nonadopters (43.2%). Details of crops sold and off-farm activities are shown in Table 4. The most important cash crops for adopters were wheat (98.3%), faba beans (46.6%), and linseed (43.1%), while for nonadopters they were wheat (87.5%) and linseed (43.8%). Livestock sales (35%) were the third-most important generator of income for nonadopters. Most off-farm income was derived from trade for both adopters (32%) and nonadopters (29%). Other farm activities such as poultry and beekeeping were also important sources of off-farm income for 41% and 29% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively. Casual labor provided the third-most important off-farm activity for 9% of adopters and 29% of nonadopters.The total cultivated area for Adaba and Dodola was 25,732 ha and 25,825 ha, respectively. Table 5 shows the land holdings and land use pattern for farmers in the study area. About 98% and 93% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively, grew wheat (NS). Wheat area was significantly larger for adopters (1.5 ha) than nonadopters (1.1 ha) (t=2.3; p<0.05). Barley was grown by more adopters (92%) than nonadopters (81%) (χ 2 = 3.5; p<0.1); however, the area under barley was almost equal for adopters (0.8 ha) and nonadopters (0.9 ha). Close to 50% of adopters and nonadopters grew linseed and the cultivated area was about 0.6 ha for both groups. About 44% of adopters and 34% of nonadopters grew teff (NS); however the cultivated area was significantly smaller for adopters (0.4 ha) than for nonadopters (0.5 ha) (t=2.0; p<0.1). Faba beans and field peas were grown by 38% and 31% of adopters, respectively, and about 22% and 16% of nonadopters, respectively (p<0.05). The area under faba beans was close to 0.35 ha for both groups, while the area under field peas was 0.5 ha for adopters and 0.4 ha for nonadopters (NS).Total farm size was significantly larger for adopters (3.5 ha) than for nonadopters (2.8 ha) (t=2.5; p<0.05). Likewise, adopters (3.3 ha) had a significantly larger cultivated area than nonadopters (2.6 ha) (t=2.6; p<0.01). Fifteen percent of adopters and twelve percent of nonadopters sharecropped their land, and the two groups sharecropped similar amounts of land. The area under fallow was also similar for adopters (0.8 ha) and nonadopters (0.7). Both groups owned about four parcels of land. About 94% and 97% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively, received their land as an allocation from the local PA. About 8% of adopters rented or inherited their land, while 2% and 5% of nonadopters rented or inherited their land, respectively.The average number of tropical livestock units (TLU) was significantly higher for adopters (9.2) than for nonadopters (6.2) (t=2.7; p<0.01) (Table 6). About 92% and 95% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively, owned oxen. The average number of oxen owned appeared to be slightly higher for adopters (2.8) than nonadopters (2.4), but this difference was not significant. Eighty-one percent of the adopters owned cows compared to about 84% of the nonadopters. The average number of cows, Note: NS = not significant; NC = not calculated.however, was significantly higher for adopters (4.4) than nonadopters (3.3) (t=1.7; p<0.1). For adopters, about 58% and 77% owned donkeys and equines, respectively, while 63% of nonadopters owned both donkeys and equines. The average number of donkeys and equines did not differ significantly between groups. About 62% and 42% of the adopters owned sheep and goats, respectively, while 58% and 16% of nonadopters owned sheep and goats, respectively. The average number of sheep (4.6) and goats (3.8) was almost equal for both groups. About 46% of adopters and 47% of nonadopters owned horses. On average, adopters (2.1) owned more horses than nonadopters (1.5) (t=1.7; p<0.1). Thirty-nine percent of adopters and 26% of nonadopters owned other livestock (young bulls, heifers, and calves). The average number of young bulls (3.0) and heifers (3.5) owned by adopters was significantly higher than the average number of young bulls (1.7) and heifers (1.8) owned by nonadopters (p<0.1). The average number of calves did not differ significantly between adopters and nonadopters.Farmers used traditional and mechanized implements for different farm operations. The types of traditional implements used by sample farmers are shown in Table 7. The adopters appeared to own more hand hoes, ox plows, ox harrows, ox carts, and sickles than nonadopters; however, these differences were not significant. The most important constraint to farm mechanization for 68% of the adopters and 77% of the nonadopters was a lack of cash to purchase and/or hire farm implements. Other constraints included the unavailability of farm implements, land fragmentation, the nature of the terrain, and lack of knowledge. About 71% of adopters and 53% of nonadopters used mechanized farm implements (p<0.05). About 44% and 42% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively, used a tractor for land preparation, while 93% and 100% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively, used a combine harvester.During 1997, about 42% of farmers planted improved wheat varieties, while 58% planted only local varieties. For the adopters, about 65% of their wheat area was allocated to improved wheat varieties.The adoption of improved wheat varied across woredas. In Adaba, about 34% of farmers planted improved varieties compared to 48% of farmers in Dodola (χ 2 =2.9; p<0.1). Moreover, the average area under improved wheat was significantly larger in Dodola (0.5 ha) compared to Adaba (0.2 ha) (t=3.8; p<0.01). About 51% of adopters planted Kubsa (HAR-1685), 49% planted Wabe (HAR-710), and 8% planted Mitike (HAR-1709). During 1997, 65% of the area farmed by adopters was planted to improved wheat varieties. About 41% of adopters planted Pavon-76, 10% planted Dashen, 12% planted Israel, 8% planted K6295-4A, 5% planted ET-13, and 3% planted other local wheat varieties. The most important varieties grown by nonadopters were Pavon-76 and Dashen. About 51% of nonadopters planted Pavon-76, 27% planted Dashen, 7% planted Israel, and 10% planted other local wheat varieties.Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the total area planted to the most important wheat varieties for adopters and nonadopters from 1992 to 1997. The figures show that the area under Kubsa and Wabe increased for the adopters, while the area under Pavon-76 and Dashen increased for the nonadopters.About 95% of adopters and 75% of nonadopters indicated that they had increased their total improved wheat area over time. The main reason given by adopters (90.9%) and nonadopters (78.3%) for increasing wheat area was the high market price of wheat compared to alternative crops. A second important reason for both adopters (54.4%) and nonadopters (39.1%) was the availability of superior improved wheat seed compared to improved seed of other crops. About 36% and 39% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively, reported an increased requirement for home consumption as the reason for increasing their wheat area. Other reasons included the ease of mechanization of wheat production, and the low risk of wheat crop failure due to disease. Twenty-eight percent of adopters and 15% of nonadopters decreased the total area under local wheat varieties over time, while only 1% of both adopters and nonadopters decreased the area under improved wheat. The reasons for decreasing the total wheat area included poor quality of wheat seed, unsuitable soils for wheat production, unavailability of fertilizer, and the importance of other crops. About 5% of adopters and 17% of nonadopters did not change their amount of wheat area.Table 8 shows the sources of wheat seed and the constraints on obtaining improved seed for farmers in the study area. For the adopters, about 51% obtained seed from the extension service of the OADB, 48% purchased their wheat seed, and 15% obtained their seed from other farmers. Most nonadopters (61.6%) purchased their seed, while 18% and 16% obtained their seed from the extension service or other farmers, respectively. Most of the adopters (61.3%) who purchased wheat seed bought it at the local market, while 23% bought it from other farmers. Three percent of the adopters purchased their wheat seed from local merchants or the Ethiopian Seed Enterprise (ESE). About 55% of nonadopters purchased wheat seed at the local market, while 31% bought it from other farmers. Five percent of the nonadopters purchased their wheat seed from local merchants or Fifty percent of adopters and 53% of nonadopters preferred Pavon-76 (Table 9). The second most preferred variety was Kubsa for 39% and 26% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively, followed by Wabe for 38% of adopters and 23% of nonadopters. The reasons why adopters preferred these varieties included the basis of recommendations from research stations or extension agents. More than 90% of farmers in both groups prepared their land at a specific time because it coincided with the beginning of the rains or for traditional reasons. All farmers used the local ox plow (maresha) for land preparation. Both groups plowed their land four times with the maresha. Sometimes farmers used the maresha in combination with a tractor. About 37% of adopters and 24% of nonadopters used a tractor for land preparation. Where the ox plow was used in conjunction with a tractor, both farmer groups plowed an average of three times. About 24% of adopters and 22% of nonadopters were informed of plowing frequency by an OADB extension agent, while more than 90% of farmers plowed in the traditional way.More than 80% of farmers in both groups planted wheat in June, and about 90% of farmers reported that this decision was based on tradition or due to the beginning of the rains. Only 20% and 19% of the adopters and nonadopters, respectively, planted during June because of recommendations from OADB extension agents. The average seed rate used was 185.0 kg/ha and 178.4 kg/ha for adopters and nonadopters, respectively (NS). Only 21% of adopters and 18% of nonadopters used the seed rate (150-175 kg/ha) recommended by OADB extension agents. The main reasons for not adopting the recommended seed rate were: 1) farmers perceived the traditional seed rate to be superior, and 2) farmers used a higher seed rate to compensate for low soil fertility.Soil fertility practices of adopters and nonadopters are shown in Table 11. About 95% of adopters and 75% of nonadopters applied chemical fertilizer in 1996 and 1997 (p<0.01).During 1997, adopters used significantly more DAP (87.8 kg/ha) than nonadopters (77.6 kg/ ha) (t= 1.9; p<0.1). Also, adopters used significantly more urea (80.6 kg/ha) than nonadopters (60.4 kg/ha) (t=1.8; p<0.01). More than 90% of both groups broadcasted their fertilizer. Fertilizer was applied to an average wheat area of 1.4 ha for adopters and 1.2 ha for nonadopters. Both groups used less than the recommended rate of 100 kg/ha of DAP and 100 kg/ha of urea, even though about 81% of adopters and 62% of nonadopters were aware of the recommended rates. The main reason that adopters (80%) and nonadopters (82.5%) did not follow the recommendations was a lack of cash for the required down payment. About 93% of adopters and 86% of nonadopters were satisfied with the fertilizer packaging size (NS).Most farmers in Ethiopia have a long history of fertilizer use. In the study area, most adopters (57.9%) and nonadopters (45.7%) started using fertilizer during the Dergue regime (1974)(1975)(1976)(1977)(1978)(1979)(1980)(1981)(1982)(1983)(1984)(1985)(1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991), while about 9% of adopters and 14% of nonadopters started using fertilizer during the reign of Haile Selassie (prior to 1974). About 65% of adopters and 37% of nonadopters increased fertilizer use over time because they were convinced of the benefits and had perceived a decline in soil fertility. Fourteen percent of adopters and 12% of nonadopters decreased fertilizer use, mainly due to its high price. About 21% of adopters and 37% of nonadopters maintained a constant level of fertilizer usage.About 98% of adopters and 80% of nonadopters used the purchased fertilizer on wheat, and 88% of adopters and 82% of nonadopters used it on barley. Few farmers used fertilizer on linseed or teff.Most adopters (96.2%) bought fertilizer from an OADB extension agent, while 6% bought it at the local market. The nonadopters (81.5%) mainly bought fertilizer from an extension agent, while about 15% and 6% bought it from the local market or a local merchant, respectively. High price was the major reason given for not using fertilizer by adopters (78%) and nonadopters (88.2%). Problems associated with fertilizer use were: late delivery, reported by 55.9% of adopters and 55.9% of nonadopters; lack of credit, reported by 31% of adopters and 27% of nonadopters; and a lack of cash, reported by 35% of adopters and 32% of nonadopters. Other constraints included inadequate supply or lack of availability of fertilizer, and low market price of wheat.Crop rotation and fallowing were the most important alternative soil fertility management practices. About 72% of adopters and 63% of nonadopters practiced crop rotation. The adopters rotated wheat with barley (86.4%), linseed (55.9%), faba beans (32.2%), or field peas (25.4%), while the nonadopters rotated wheat with barley (81%), linseed (58.2%), faba beans (22.8%), and field peas (21.5%). About 53% of adopters rotated their crops once every two years, 23% rotated crops once every three years, and 23% rotated crops twice in three years. Sixty-two percent of nonadopters rotated their crops once every two years, 20% rotated crops once every three years, and 18% rotated crops twice in three years.Both adopters and nonadopters reported that broadleaf and grassy weeds were equally important in their wheat fields (Table 12). About 95% of adopters and 93% of nonadopters controlled weeds by hand, whereas 87% of adopters and 61% of nonadopters used herbicides. The average number of hand weedings was 1.7 and 1.8 for adopters and nonadopters, respectively (NS). While only 18% of adopters and 5% of nonadopters hand weeded on the basis of the OADB recommendation, 42% and 33%, respectively, were aware of the recommended weeding frequency. The main constraints to frequency of hand weeding for adopters were labor shortage (74.5%) and lack of cash to hire labor (59.6%). Similarly, the main constraints for nonadopters were labor shortage (68.2%) and lack of cash to hire labor (60.6%).The most common herbicide used was U-46. The adopters (1.0 l/ha) used significantly more U-46 than nonadopters (0.8 l/ha) (t=2.0; p<0.1). About 61% and 52% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively, obtained herbicide from the agricultural development offices of the OADB, while about 30% and 47% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively, obtained herbicide from the local market. About 63% of adopters and 47% of nonadopters were aware of the recommended herbicide rate. Eighty-eight percent of adopters and 79% of nonadopters obtained information on herbicide use from an OADB extension agent. Other information sources included research staff at the Sinana Research Station (4% of adopters and 17.9% of nonadopters) and other farmers (4% for both groups). The main constraints to herbicide use for adopters included a lack of sprayers (58.0%), the high rental cost of sprayers (58.0%), and high price of herbicide (44.0%). The main constraints reported by nonadopters were a lack of sprayers (68.9%), high rental cost of sprayers (60%), and high price of herbicide (55.6%).The most problematic weed that could not be adequately controlled by current weeding practices was Snowdenia polystachya, locally known as \"muja\" (reported by 75% of both adopters and nonadopters). Other problematic weeds included Avena fatua, locally known as \"sinar\" (21.2% of adopters and 26% of nonadopters), and \"shabie\" (5.8% of adopters and 13.7% of nonadopters). Table 13 summarizes disease and pest management undertaken by farmers in the study area. The most important diseases were leaf rust (Puccinia recondita), reported by 96.3% of adopters and 94.8% of nonadopters, and stem rust (Puccinia graminis), reported by 53.2% of adopters and 48.3% of nonadopters. Pavon-76, Dashen, and Wabe were the most affected wheat varieties reported by 51.2%, 27.9%, and 18.6% of adopters, respectively. For the nonadopters, Pavon-76 (56.1%) and Dashen (26.3%) were the most affected varieties. None of the farmers practiced disease control measures. A lack of knowledge of disease control was the main constraint cited by both adopters (73.9%) and nonadopters (87.5%). Also, adopters (10.9%) and nonadopters (5.4%) reported that there were no critical wheat diseases in the area. The lack of availability of chemicals was another reason for not practicing disease control, according to 15% and 11% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively.About 28% of adopters and 29% of nonadopters reported that they had no pest problems. The most important pests for adopters were cut worms (13.7%), wild animals (13.7%), and army worms (7.8%). For nonadopters, cut worms (35.3%) and aphids (8.8%) were the most important pests. Nine percent of adopters and none of the nonadopters practiced pest control measures. A lack of knowledge on how to control pests was the main constraint cited by adopters (45.7%) and nonadopters (51.2%); however, 45.7% of adopters and 16.3% of nonadopters reported that pest control was not necessary. The unavailability of chemicals was cited as a constraint on pest control by 6% of adopters and 12% of nonadopters. Other minor problems reported were a lack of money, high price of chemicals, and the complexity of chemical application.Most adopters (77%) and nonadopters (53.8%) cleaned their wheat seed and stored it separately from their grain (Table 14). Most farmers in both groups (77%) stored their wheat seed in a traditional gotera-a local container made from bamboo plastered with mud. Twenty-four percent of farmers in both groups used fertilizer bags. Rodents (rats) were the most important storage problem reported by adopters (78.9%) and nonadopters (77%). About 56% and 19% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively, reported weevils as an important storage problem. Another impediment to storage was high grain moisture, reported by 8.8% of adopters and 6.8% of nonadopters. The types of credit that farmers have access to and the constraints they face in accessing formal credit are shown in Table 15. Farmers obtain formal credit through the agricultural development offices of their respective woredas in the form of farm inputs (fertilizer, improved seeds, and/or herbicides). About 85% of adopters and 60% of nonadopters received credit for fertilizer, while 48% of adopters and 9% of nonadopters received credit for improved wheat seed. Both differences were significant at p<0.01. The average amount of credit received was 660 Birr and 490 Birr for adopters and nonadopters, respectively (NS). For adopters, the decision to use credit was made jointly by the husband and wife (50.9%), or individually by the husband (41.5%) or the wife (5.7%). For nonadopters, the decision to use credit was made jointly (34%), or individually by the husband (31%) or the wife (19% Note: NS = not significant; *** = significant at p<0.01.Both adopters (42.6%) and nonadopters (38.7%) commonly received one or two visits from extension agents per month (Table 16). The gender of the extension agent was usually male (74.1% for adopters and 65.7% for nonadopters). The majority of adopters (84.4%) and nonadopters (75.5%) did not express a preference for the gender of the extension agent. About 21% of adopters and 14% of nonadopters preferred a male extension agent.The extension agent usually visited adopters (100%) and nonadopters (95.2%) as part of a group visit, while for 61% of adopters and 22% of nonadopters, the extension agent made individual visits.The extension agent contacted the male head of the household for 60.7% of adopters and 33.9% of nonadopters. For about 7% of adopters and 23% of nonadopters, the extension agent contacted the wife of the household. Extension staff contacted both spouses for 32% of adopters and 44% of nonadopters.About 39% of adopters and 6% of nonadopters were contact farmers (p<0.01). Other sources of agricultural information reported by adopters were farmer field days (83%), farmer training courses (21.3%), and radio messages (48.9%). For nonadopters, other sources of agricultural information included farmer field days (80.6%), farmer training courses (22.2%), and radio messages (47.2%).All farmers were members of a PA. The services commonly offered by a PA included handling credit in kind (seed and fertilizer) for farmers, and land allocation. About 24% of adopters and 11% of nonadopters were office bearers in their respective PA (p<0.05). Note: NS = not significant; ** = significant at p<0.05; *** = significant at p<0.01; NC = not calculated. Feder et al. (1985) defined adoption as the degree of use of a new technology in a long-run equilibrium when a farmer has all of the information about the new technology and its potential.Adoption at the farm level reflects the farmer's decision to incorporate a new technology into the production process. On the other hand, aggregate adoption is the process of spread or diffusion of a new technology within a region. Therefore, a distinction exists between adoption at the individual farm level and aggregate adoption within a targeted region. If an innovation is modified periodically, the adoption level may not reach equilibrium. This situation requires the use of econometric procedures that can capture both the rate and the process of adoption. The rate of adoption is defined as the proportion of farmers who have adopted a new technology over time. The incidence of adoption is the percentage of farmers using a technology at a specific point in time (e.g., the percentage of farmers using fertilizer). The intensity of adoption is defined as the aggregate level of adoption of a given technology (e.g., the number of hectares planted with improved seed or the amount of fertilizer applied).The results of the tobit model on the mean proportion of land allocated to improved wheat varieties are presented in Table 17. The tobit model was used because the mean proportion of land allocated to improved wheat varieties is a continuous variable but truncated between zero and one. The use of ordinary least squares will result in biased estimates (McDonald and Moffitt 1980). In Table 17, δEY/ δX i shows the marginal effect of an explanatory variable on the expected value (mean proportion) of the dependent variable, δEY*/δX i shows changes in the intensity of adoption with respect to a unit change of an independent variable among adopters, and δF(z)/δX i is the probability of a change among nonadopters (e.g., the probability of adopting improved wheat varieties) with a unit change in the independent variable (Roncek 1992). The Wald chi-square statistic was significant at p<0.01.The farmer's age, use of credit, and several varietal characteristics preferred by farmers (disease and lodging resistance, bread baking quality) significantly influenced the mean proportion of land allocated to improved wheat varieties. The marginal effect of the farmer's age on the mean proportion of land allocated to improved wheat varieties was -0.01, and farmer's age decreased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by 1.5%. The marginal effect of credit on improved wheat area was 0.59, and credit increased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by 84.3%. The majority of adopters obtained credit in kind in the form of improved seed and fertilizer through the OADB extension package. These inputs are distributed to farmers who are willing to host a demonstration plot.The varietal characteristics that were significant to farmers were the perceived resistance to disease and lodging, and baking quality. The marginal effect of disease resistance on the mean proportion of land allocated to improved wheat varieties was 0.32, and the probability of adoption among nonadopters increased by 45.2% if the varieties were perceived to be more resistant to disease. However, the marginal effect of baking quality on improved wheat area was -0.21, and the probability of adoption among nonadopters decreased by 29.9%. Lodging resistance was the third significant varietal characteristic that farmers preferred. The improved varieties Wabe and Kubsa are shorter and hence more resistant to lodging than some of the wheat varieties previously grown, such as Enkoy and Pavon-76. The preference for lodging resistance revealed that the marginal effect of lodging resistance on improved wheat area was 0.31, while the probability of adoption among nonadopters increased by 44.2%.The coefficients of the tobit model used to investigate factors affecting the amount of N fertilizer used are shown in Table 18. The model is significant at the 1% level on the basis of the Wald chi-square statistic with 10 degrees of freedom. The farmer's total wheat area, the number of livestock, and the use of hired labor and credit significantly influenced the amount of fertilizer used. Wheat area decreased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by only 0.3%, and the marginal effect of a farmer's total wheat area on the mean amount of fertilizer used was -0.08.The marginal effect of hired labor on the mean amount of fertilizer was 0.25; the corresponding increase in the probability of adoption among nonadopters was 1.0%. The improved wheat technologies are labor intensive, primarily due to the recommended increase in hand weeding.Farmers that can afford to hire labor are usually in a better position to adopt these technologies. Hicks and Johnston (1974) reported that a higher labor requirement explained the nonadoption of improved rice varieties in Taiwan and that a shortage of family labor explained the nonadoption of high yielding varieties in India.The marginal effect of TLU on the mean amount of fertilizer used was 0.01, and TLU increased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by 0.04%. Livestock constitute accumulated wealth, a source of cash, and facilitate the 25% down payment required to obtain credit for inputs. Also, farmers who buy inputs on credit carry the risk of crop failure and, therefore, the risk of being unable to repay their debts. Farmers who own more livestock may be more willing to take risks since they will still be able to settle their debts in the event of a calamity.The marginal effect of credit on the mean amount of fertilizer used was 0.80, and credit increased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by only 3.2%. At the time of fertilizer application (June/ July), most farmers face food shortages and use their available cash to buy food grain. Provision of credit to finance the purchase of inputs is therefore critical for successful adoption of fertilizer.Adopters of improved wheat technologies were younger, more educated, and had larger families and farms. Also, adopters hired more labor and owned more livestock. All of these differences were significant. Nonadopters tended to have more off-farm income than adopters, but this difference was not significant. There were no significant differences between adopters and nonadopters in terms of the number of farm implements owned (e.g., hand hoes, ox plows, and oxen carts).During 1997, about 42% of farmers grew improved wheat varieties. Most adopters grew Kubsa (51%) or Wabe (49%). For the adopters, about 65% of their total wheat area was allocated to improved wheat varieties. In Adaba, about 34% of farmers grew improved wheat varieties compared to 48% of farmers in Dodola. Moreover, the average area under improved wheat varieties was significantly greater in Dodola (0.5 ha) than in Adaba (0.2 ha). Adopters (55%) and nonadopters (53%) preferred Pavon-76, followed by Kubsa, which was preferred by 39% and 26% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively. Varietal traits considered important by farmers included high yield, resistance to sprouting and lodging, seed color and size, and baking quality. High price was reported as the main constraint on using improved wheat seed.Most adopters (55%) began land preparation in March, while nonadopters (48%) began in February. More than 80% of farmers in both groups planted wheat in June. The average seed rate was 185 kg/ha and 178 kg/ha for adopters and nonadopters, respectively, which are both higher than the recommended seed rate of 150-175 kg/ha. According to farmers, a higher seed rate was used to compensate for low soil fertility and to compete with weeds.Fertilizer was mainly applied to wheat and barley crops by 98% and 88% of adopters, respectively, and 80% and 82% of nonadopters, respectively. Significantly more adopters (95%) applied chemical fertilizer than nonadopters (75%). Adopters applied 88 kg/ha of DAP and 81 kg/ha of urea while nonadopters applied 78 kg/ha of DAP and 60 kg/ha of urea. However, the average fertilizer application rate for both groups was below the recommended rate (100 kg/ha DAP and 100 kg/ha urea). The main constraint to fertilizer use for both groups was its high price. Crop rotation and fallowing were two other important soil fertility management practices.According to both groups, broadleaf and grassy weeds were equally important in their wheat fields. Farmers controlled weeds by hand weeding or herbicide application. About 95% and 87% of adopters controlled weeds by hand weeding and herbicides, respectively, compared with 93% and 61% of the nonadopters, respectively. According to 75% of farmers, the most problematic weed that was not controlled by existing weed control measures was Snowdenia polystachya. The most important diseases were \"leaf rust\" (= P. striiformis) and \"stem rust\" (= P. graminis), while cut worms, wild animals, and army worms were the most important pests. None of the farmers practiced disease control and only 9% of adopters practiced pest control. The main reason that farmers did not attempt to control diseases and pests was a lack of knowledge of appropriate control practices.Farmers obtained formal credit through the agricultural development offices of their respective woredas in the form of farm inputs (fertilizer, improved seeds, herbicides). About 85% of adopters and 60% of nonadopters had access to credit for fertilizer, while 48% and 9% of adopters and nonadopters, respectively, had access to credit for improved seed. The main credit constraints for both groups were high interest rates and a lack of cash for the required 25% down payment to purchase inputs. All of the adopters and 99% of nonadopters had received an extension visit. Other sources of agricultural information were farmer field days, farmer training courses, and radio broadcasts.The farmer's age, use of credit, and several varietal characteristics preferred by farmers (disease and lodging resistance, bread baking quality) significantly influenced the mean proportion of land allocated to improved wheat varieties. The marginal effect of the farmer's age on the mean proportion of land allocated to improved wheat varieties was -0.01, and farmer's age decreased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by 1.5%. The marginal effect of the use of credit on improved wheat area was 0.59, and credit increased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by 84.3%. The marginal effect of disease resistance on improved wheat area was 0.32, and the probability of adoption among nonadopters increased by 45.2% if the varieties were perceived to be more disease resistant. However, the marginal effect of baking quality on the amount of land allocated to improved wheat varieties was -0.21, and the probability of adoption among nonadopters decreased by 29.9%. Lodging resistance was the third significant varietal characteristic that was preferred by farmers. The marginal effect of lodging resistance on improved wheat area was 0.31, while the probability of adoption among nonadopters increased by 44.2%.The farmer's total wheat area, the number of livestock, and the use of hired labor and credit significantly influenced the amount of fertilizer used. The marginal effect of a farmer's total wheat area on the mean amount of fertilizer used was -0.08, and wheat area decreased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by only 0.3%. The marginal effect of hired labor was 0.25; the corresponding increase in the probability of adoption among nonadopters was 1.0%. The marginal effect of TLU on the mean amount of fertilizer used was 0.01, and TLU increased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by 0.04%. The marginal effect of credit on the mean amount of fertilizer used was 0.80, and credit increased the probability of adoption among nonadopters by only 3.2%.Pavon-76 was preferred by both adopters (50%) and nonadopters (53%). This suggests that this variety has important traits that farmers appreciate, and should be considered in the national and regional wheat breeding programs. In particular, the farmer's perception of the disease and lodging resistance of the improved wheat varieties positively influenced adoption. The perceived baking quality of the varieties negatively influenced adoption, however, and this trait should receive a higher priority in wheat breeding programs.The tobit analysis revealed that access to credit is a determining factor in a farmer's decision to adopt improved wheat technologies, and credit for the purchase of improved seeds and fertilizer should be extended to all farmers. Credit in kind would not only relax the cash constraint currently existing in most farm communities, but also improve farmers' access to inputs.Availability of hired labor is another determinant of a farmer's adoption of fertilizer, emphasizing the importance of developing labor-saving wheat technologies. This would offset the costs of hired labor and would expand the adoption of fertilizer by farmers who cannot afford hired labor.Livestock ownership was an important factor in the adoption of fertilizer. Livestock represent the main cash source to finance crop production and livestock ownership is one means by which farmers can minimize the risks associated with crop failure. Therefore, research and extension staff should increase the attention given to livestock.","tokenCount":"8511"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0023127994.json b/data/part_1/0023127994.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8437a07a8fd584fda96e03f3ca821752af1c49fc --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0023127994.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"072912c4b512cc489b0ab2f527bc6dc0","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/79788f70-1944-4632-ab22-509deeaa2cbd/retrieve","id":"1571579108"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"30bda66d-7b9a-439f-953f-312d615ac610","pagecount":"45","content":"We thank the Alliance of Bioversity and CIAT and WWF Germany for their financial contribution. A GLOBAL COLLECTION OF GOOD PRACTICE CASES 4 Wamena coffee is an organic arabica coffee from central range montane forest of New Guinea, cultivated by local communities without insecticide and chemical fertilizers.This guide is a showcase of good practices from around the world that use food systems as a pathway to meet many interconnected biodiversity-related targets in the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework.Intended for practitioners and policymakers, it does not set out a 'one size fits all' approach but rather good practice examples that have the potential to be adapted and scaled in a variety of food systems around the world.The post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework sets out an ambitious plan to implement broad-based action to transform society's relationship with biodiversity, ensuring that by 2050 the shared vision of 'living in harmony with nature' is fulfilled.To live in harmony with nature and deliver food and livelihood security to millions of vulnerable people around the world, we must conserve and sustainably use biodiversity in our food systems, and better integrate and align efforts to conserve both agricultural and wild biodiversity rather than pursuing them separately.That today's unsustainable agricultural practices are both driving and suffering from the effects of climate change, biodiversity loss, and ecosystem degradation is not under dispute. Modern food systems also invest in and rely on just a narrow handful of plant and animal species. This high-risk approach neglects the myriad of species, breeds, and strains of crops, animals, and fish at the heart of our food systems that boost resilience and provide diverse diets that are nutritious, sustainable, affordable, acceptable, safe, and accessible to all. At the same time, wild biodiversity that contributes to healthy ecosystems and ecosystem services that are critical to food production, such as pollination and soil fertility, is also at risk from agriculture, for example, through land conversion.The good news is that there are many good practices from around the world that use and conserve biodiversity to replenish ecosystem health and restore forest systems; deliver inclusive development for rural communities and Indigenous Peoples; increase productivity and resilience to climate change in production systems; help drive consumer shifts toward healthy eating for a healthy planet. You will also find examples of efforts to conserve traditional varieties of crops and associated knowledge that may hold unique genetic keys to adapt our food systems now and in the future. Many of these examples are supported by strong innovative enabling policies, at regional, national, and local levels, that incentivize the sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity for resilient, healthy, and sustainable food systems.Each section in the guide is mapped to its potential to deliver across Action 2030 Targets as set out in the first draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD/WG2020/3/3).It is important to note that using and conserving biodiversity in food systems delivers across many objectives of the CBD Framework simultaneously so this is not intended as a definitive list but rather as a useful overview of ways that sustainable food systems can deliver across many objectives of the framework.Targets 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 13, 14Ecosystem services are the benefits that people obtain from nature such as clean water and carbon sequestration. In agriculture, ecosystem services include pollination, natural pest and disease control, nutrient cycling, and more. Yet despite the importance of ecosystem services to farming communities, markets, policies, and research often focus on specialization and economies of scale where biodiversity is seen as an impediment to crop productivity and farm income.Using agricultural practices based on biodiversity -genetic varieties, species, soil, and landscapes -can increase resilience in our food production systems and contribute to restoration efforts, for example, by reducing soil erosion. At the same time, restoration efforts increase habitats for wild species of benefit to food production systems such as pollinators, pest predators, and crop wild relatives.Vietnam farmer Bearing seedlings of rice to plant, Asian farmer Bearing rice seedlings on the back before the grown in paddy field.© Shutterstock / TOM...foto / WWF 10To support agricultural water management, the researchers adapted a set of tools that local farmers could use to optimize their groundwater use for irrigation. Using soil moisture probes and nutrient measurements, farmers were able to save up to 40% of water, 30% of energy (for pumping groundwater), and 80% of fertilizers on their crops and enhanced crop production creating savings and additional incomes for the farmers.• Currently, the countries in the Limpopo Basin have different policy requirements relating to the provision of e-flows, but all are committed to protecting the aquatic ecosystems to ensure a sustainable future and to meet water-resourcesharing treaties. While there is only detail about environmental flows in the South African legislation, the basic framework exists in all riparian countries.• Next steps include testing high-tech modern digital methods to contribute to aspects of assessing and implementing e-flows as well as other parts of water resource management.This project was carried out by the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) in partnership with Rivers for Life and the University of Mpumalanga in South Africa and supported by USAID with help from national departments responsible for water and sanitation including the Limpopo Watercourse Commission.Community InclusionCapacity Strengthening1.1 E-flows in the Limpopo Basin in Botswana, Mozambique, South Africa, and ZimbabweThe Limpopo River basin in southern Africa is shared by Botswana, Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. It is the driest it has been for 35 years with groundwater supplies held in porous rock under the ground -aquifers -at risk of running low, especially at times of drought. This project has been set out to deliver ecosystem health, boost biodiversity and support the livelihoods of rural communities that depend on the river basin for their water security, for example, for irrigation of their crops, through better understanding and management of environmental flows (e-flows). E-flows are the river flows needed to support vegetation, fish, and macroinvertebrates like snails, worms, and crayfish in both the river and its margins, which in turn provide ecosystem services, like nutrient recycling. By studying the volume, timing, and duration of e-flows it is possible to strike a balance between water resource development and the protection of freshwater ecosystems.Water resources provided by the Limpopo Basin are socially, economically, and ecologically valuable, supporting communities that are highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. In 2016, reduced rainfall led to the Limpopo Province in South Africa being declared a disaster area with widespread crop failure and economic hardship. Other threats include a growing population which is driving greater demand for the water, and pollution caused by excessive upstream use -major cities including Johannesburg, Pretoria, and Gaborone lie upstream. The water resources are also over-utilized, primarily for irrigation, and the goods and services provided by the biodiversity and ecosystems of the rivers in the basin are affected.The project carried out a risk assessment to predict how changes in the river's flow affect the various ecosystem services that people depend on, as well as local biodiversity. The assessment included field surveys and looked at historical data in 27 risk areas to inform a plan to sustainably protect and use the water resources.• Findings showed that the risk of altered flows into the ecosystem and potential negative impacts are high where the sub-basin areas are in a high-risk, unsustainable, and impaired state -almost 68% of the basin falls under this category, with high risk to ecosystem services identified in 27% in the upper and middle parts of the basin.• Implementing e-flows can reduce risks, potentially returning more than 80% of the area to a sustainable state, for example, through better management of groundwater. The project worked with transboundary partners to understand better the needs and challenges of sustainable water management in shared aquifers, for example, the Ramotswa Aquifer, which lies between South Africa and Botswana. Activities included mapping both physical attributes and cultural needs.• Better understanding and management of e-flows in river basins can increase freshwater supplies, including for irrigation, and protect freshwater ecosystems and the services they provide.• Successful forest, water system, and landscape restoration often requires working with transboundary partners to understand needs and overcome challenges. In the Limpopo Basin, this included mapping both physical attributes and cultural needs for shared aquifers.• Incentives for farmers to support agricultural water management is critical. This project supported adapted tools to optimize groundwater use for irrigation which saved farmers costs and water, and enhanced production. 12 This WWF-led project is carried out in partnership with Tanzania Forest Services and is part of the large Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR) program in the East Usambara funded by the Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA). Find out more about the Trillion Trees project.Checklist:Capacity Strengthening A restored Ngitili system in the Shinyanga Region, Tanzania.Through its Trillion Trees project, WWF in partnership with BirdLife International and the Wildlife Conservation Society is leading large-scale efforts to maintain multiple forest functions, prevent the loss of globally important biodiversity, and improve the livelihoods of forest-dependent communities through climate-smart, sustainable agriculture. The project is working in the Usambara mountains which cover an area of 3,500 km 2 and include the Eastern Arc Mountain forests, nature reserves, and major rivers which supply water essential for agriculture, hydropower, human use, livestock, and wildlife. WWF is also supporting forest restoration efforts in the Kilwa and Kisarawe districts in southeast Tanzania.Forest areas in Tanzania are being adversely impacted by deforestation and degradation, in particular, for charcoal production which is a source of fuel and income for many households, and for agriculture, which is the mainstay of the Tanzanian economy and the country's largest employer. The degradation of the landscape is harming the communities who depend on it for their livelihoods, well-being, and food security, for example, in the Kilwa districts, the loss of nutrients in the soil means that crop farming is not viable beyond a season or two, so plots are abandoned, and new forest areas cleared to serve as new ones.• Civil Society Organizations can be an effective entry point for community engagement, needs mapping and capacity building in forest landscape restoration projects.• Community volunteers, including women, who receive training on improved farm practices, can be supported and incentivized to set up their own forest-friendly farms to demonstrate agroecological production practices and serve as a means of empowerment and livelihoods.• Value addition activities, for example, seed oil production, can also serve as incentives for communities to transition to sustainable agricultural practices in the long-term.Good practices• Civil Society Organization (CSO) engagement through a stakeholder mapping exercise with five CSOs to ensure enhanced community representation and inclusion in the restoration project. CSOs were also invited by WWF to attend an engagement planning workshop with government agencies, NGOs, research institutions, and community groups. Two were selected to receive financial support through grants while the others continued to be included in the planning, implementation, and monitoring of their forest landscape restoration, building capacity in conservation work, and financial management.• Capacity building to train farmers on how to combine cropping practices to help reduce soil erosion and water runoff, increase soil fertility, and increase yields to reduce the practice of shifting to new plots.• Community members from six project sites, in particular, vulnerable women, were encouraged to establish demonstration farms of sunflower, sesame, sorghum, or cassava on previously abandoned farmlands to boost incomes and as a means of empowerment beyond the project, for example, through small-scale oil production.• Engagement with six schools as an entry point reached young people and households with information and other benefits on restoration, for example, through tree planting and management activities. The project expects to raise 30,000 tree seedlings that will be planted around and within the East Usambara mountains. 14• The economic trade-off between the natural capital of a healthy landscape against primary food production is mitigated through the FLR349 Fund. The fund provides each smallholder farmer with 1-1.5 ha of land and a subsidy of $390 ha per year for five years to support the transition to sustainable farming and increase their self-reliance beyond the project. It costs $5,859 per ha for 6 years of operation to sustain the restoration program which includes support such as capacity building and seedlings. The funding is sourced through crowdfunding and private-sector donations.• Seedlings include a diverse mix of food and cash crops such as avocado, cacao coffee, lychee, and mango, that grow within the forest landscape, can support livelihoods, and are appropriate for the land, for example, trees and plants that provide moisture and trap water or that can grow under the shade of large trees.• Other incentivizing schemes include a carbon credit scheme for sustainable agriculture transformation, which is currently under feasibility study ( 2022) with a multi-stakeholder partnership. The scheme will use remote sensing technologies in the measurement of carbon sequestration in the project areas.• FLR349 SE (Social Enterprise), a bankable business model, was recently established to develop a self-sufficient value chain to remove reliance on public funding, through the 'Food for Forests' umbrella. Products include 'Vegetables for Forests,' 'Chicken Eggs for Forests,' and 'Coffee and Cacao for Forests.' Through the value chain, FLR349 SE assists farmers to market and brand products, and distribute them to the right markets, helping to connect producers with consumers.• A traceability platform will be developed (currently in progress) to link stakeholders along the supply chain and enable them to access information and remote sensing data regarding the food supply chain, make donations to support the operation, and track the progress of reforestation efforts. Clear indicators, such as carbon sequestration and social return on investment will help ensure good socio-economic and environmental benefits from the project.• WWF Thailand has also supported and worked directly together with smallholder farmers, community-based organizations, and local social enterprises to build capacity and skills in implementing agricultural approaches for ecological restoration.The project has provided support to and worked in partnership with smallholder farmers, cooperatives and local administrative organizations at project sites. Between 2018 -2022, a thousand smallholder farmers have benefited from the project. Workshops have been conducted to validate and share farming practices that better protect the environment. More than 200 ha of maize plantation have been successfully converted from monoculture to agroecology so far serving as model sites for sustainable agriculture and supply chains. Once established, the FLR349 model provides smallholder farmers with multiple times the income compared to what they were earning through monoculture agriculture, increasing their self-reliance.Impact assessments show how that for every 1 Thai baht (USD 0.026) invested, social benefits of 8.367 Thai baht (USD 0.22) are generated including increased farmer knowledge and income, a decrease in environmental management cost, increased access to affordable organic food and a reduction in government healthcare expenses from reduced agrochemical use. It also shows potential to contribute to national GHG mitigation strategies and forest restoration targets. Agroecology has proven climate mitigation potential. A study commissioned by the project found that while maize plantation releases high amount of carbon, agroecology systems store more carbon than they release, demonstrating the high potential of scaling out implementation of the project for climate mitigation.Public-Private PartnershipsChecklist:In the Nan Province, known as a monoculture farming area, a conservation group called 'Jorb Plien Nan' is working to turn 'bald mountains' into rich watershed forests again.Three Forests, Four Benefits is a WWF conservation project that works in partnership with farmers, the private sector, the public sector, and civil society organizations. to implement agricultural practices for environmental restoration. It is part of an initiative of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej which includes a Forest and Landscape Restoration Fund and approach (FLR349) to restore degraded land through the development of sustainable value chains which empower rural communities. Activities include planting mixed systems of fruit trees, vegetables, and herbs which help replenish the soil, contribute to ecosystem health, and increase resilience in food systems. This regenerative agricultural system also offers increased yields and resilience to climate instability and improves the health and vitality of farming communities. The project is focused on the Chiangmai and Nan provinces in northern Thailand which is an area dominated by watershed forests and rich in biodiversity, but which is being encroached upon for cash crop plantations.• Food production of diversified local varieties and perennial crops can help restore degraded lands and forests, protect biodiversity and pollinators, and restore carbon back into the soil. Family farmers that adopt biodiversity-based approaches can be powerful agents of change with the right support.• To encourage farmers to permanently make the shift from intensive agrochemical monoculture practices to using agroecological approaches requires educational outreach, capacity strengthening and incentives including financial support, land, seedlings, value chain development and carbon credits.• FLR349 SE (Social Enterprise), a bankable business model, was recently established to develop a self-sufficient value chain to remove reliance on public funding, through the 'Food for Forests' umbrella. Products include 'Vegetables for Forests,' 'Chicken Eggs for Forests,' and 'Coffee and Cacao for Forests.'Approximately 800,000ha of forest in Thailand has been destroyed so far for cash crop cultivation which is primarily maize for animal feed to support the country's meat export industry. This has reduced the ability of smallholder producers in the forest to be able to sustain their livelihoods putting food security at risk. As well as forest clearance, land preparation includes open burning of agricultural residues which leads to heavy haze pollution. Over the past decades, maize has become a major driver of deforestation in northern Thailand, as well as in neighboring Myanmar and Lao PDR. 16Highlight: Building on Success and Scaling UpFollowing the success of the Agua de Honduras platform in providing critical data to help policymakers make smarter water investment decisions and improve water management, the Government of Honduras has officially adopted it as one of the main water management systems of the Ministry of Environment (MiAmbiente+) where it is expected to help water conservation investments as well as access to water for smallholder farms and human consumption. In the future, it could benefit millions of Hondurans.It has also attracted the attention of international agencies which have supported the expansion and migration of the AGRI tool to the whole of Central America, East Africa, and the island of Grenada. Now, this novel tool is almost finished for other four islands of the Caribbean and in the north of Argentina with the support of FAO.This reservoir is located in the village of La Azomada, in the municipality of Gracias, Lempira. More than 60 producer families benefit from its waters to irrigate their crops.1.4 Agua de Honduras -Improving Water for Smallholder Farming and Human Consumption Takeaways• The Agua de Honduras platform provides critical data to help policymakers make smarter water investment decisions and improve water management. Its development included community engagement to inform the creation of water scenarios that reflect real life needs.• The Government of Honduras has adopted the platform as one of its main water management systems which will expand its potential to help water conservation investments as well as access to water for smallholder farms and human consumption.• A third phase of the project is strengthening local capacities in using the platform for water resource planning and management.The project 'Agua de Honduras' is a governmental data platform that provides communities with data on hydrology, vegetative cover, soil properties, water demand, and future climate scenarios. It includes an important component called AGua para RIego (AGRI), which is a decision-making tool to identify irrigation and drinking water. Having this information readily available means technicians and decision-makers from local to national levels can access water-related information, enter local data, obtain statistics, simulate scenarios, and find new water sources. This, in turn, supports municipal, governmental, and international cooperation investments related to water conservation and improving water for smallholder farming and human consumption.Access to water resources has been one of the greatest challenges for economic and social development in some Central American countries such as Honduras where farmers and governments often lack the information needed to make the smartest water and agricultural investments. In Western Honduras, where the Agua de Honduras Platform was initially implemented, the climate can be brutally dry and unpredictable constraining most farmers to rainfed subsistence agriculture. The data in the platform can be used to help them become more food secure and boost livelihoods, as well as contribute to water conservation.• At the local level, the platform was successfully piloted in four micro-watersheds with local organizations and municipal governments. One of these organizations has already used the platform to decide where to purchase land as a strategy to increase water availability for potable water systems.• The platform has been developed in different modules, for example, data on climate change scenarios or tools for irrigation water planning (AGRI) or to assess the water balance under natural conditions.• The project has sought to engage with communities and local stakeholders in the water planning process so that local water use, and demand, can be considered when creating balanced water scenarios under different conditions, for example, that may include periods when irrigation is needed and other periods when it is not. A third phase of the project is also strengthening local capacities in using the platform for water resource planning and management.This project was supported by USAID and the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC).Checklist:Community InclusionOrganization:© CIAT/Adriana Varón• Over 1,000 knowledge products published including training manuals, reference books, videos, drama, website articles, workshops, diversity fairs, exhibitions, cross-site visits, posters, fliers, peer-reviewed publications, case studies, onfarm demonstrations, and national knowledge-sharing events between scientists and farmers.• Education materials developed and used in universities, middle schools, and technical schools in 25 countries that integrate the use of agricultural biodiversity into local curriculums.1.5 Diversity Assessment Tool for Agrobiodiversity and Resilience (DATAR)• Focusing agricultural research-for-development efforts at the species level can miss the genetic diversity of crop varieties, livestock breeds and fish strains that could provide unique traits needed to adapt food systems to challenges such as climate change adaptation.• Having data about the genetic diversity that is available and how it can be used is essential for local communities and policymakers to make informed decisions and investments for its sustainable use and conservation to meet current and future needs.• Participatory community assessments of an unlimited number of varieties of crops, and breeds of livestock, can be carried out in multiple projects and sites. The DATAR tool quickly synthesizes the information at local and national levels for community and national validation. After data assessment and validation, DATAR is then used as a decisionmaking tool to identify constraints and provide a portfolio of actions to support the use of agrobiodiversity to improve livelihoods and ecosystem health.The Diversity Assessment Tool for Agrobiodiversity and Resilience (DATAR) is an innovative, open-source IT tool built to assess agrobiodiversity and support decision-making for agricultural development. It has been developed as part of an IFAD-implemented GEF-integrated approach program to foster sustainability and resilience for food security in sub-Saharan Africa. The tool has three components -a website, web portal, and app -that help decision-makers design agricultural projects to maximize biodiversity. It enables users to access information on crops, livestock, and aquatic stock going beyond the species level to consider crop varieties, livestock breeds, and fish strains and the diversity of genetic traits they bring to the development table, for example, for climate resilience. The tool connects users with providers including ones in local communities who supply crop seeds, animal breeds, and (coming soon) aquatic farmed types best suited to their needs. It also identifies management, market, policy, and institutional constraints producers face when using local crop and animal biodiversity.• Building the DATAR App and web portal was an iterative process with multiple tests and improvements, made possible through close collaboration with national partners in Asia, Africa, the Americas, the Middle East, and Europe and local IT practitioners.• An important component of the DATAR tools is that surveys can be completed in multiple projects and sites for many species and that they include templates and questionnaires to support community engagement, for example, through focus group discussions, household surveys, and key informant interviews on various aspects including management practices, market, policy, and institutions.• Data is input directly into the app while conducting the surveys so is quick and efficient and the tool is also easy to use to find out if within your community or stakeholder group you have the biodiversity you need to meet your goal.Food production systems such as farms, livestock, agroforestry, and aquatic systems are home to rich genetic diversity yet agricultural development programs, for example, climate resilience planning, often stop short at the species level when deciding which crop, livestock, or aquatic animal would be best suited to meet its particular goal. Yet there are thousands of crop varieties, livestock breeds, and fish strains that contain a wealth of genetic diversity that can also be deployed to deliver on sustainable development goals. 1 Bioversity International and the International Center of Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) are two CGIAR centers that forged an Alliance in 2020 becoming the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT. While many projects by the two organizations referred to in this document took place or started prior to this, for consistency and ease of readership, they are both referred to as the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT throughout regardless of the date of the project.Digital innovationThe projectThe rice sector in Madagascar generates 41% of households' income making it the most important economic sector in the country. Using an Adaptation Fund established to reduce the negative effects of climate change on vulnerable communities, this adaptation project executed by the Government of Madagascar with support from UNEP and funding from the Adaptation Fund developed and piloted an Integrated Resilient Rice Model. This model adopts ecological production practices such as using organic compost rather than chemicals, deploys resilient rice varieties that require fewer inputs, and restores ecological services through reforestation and restoration efforts.In Madagascar, climate change is reducing both winter and spring rainfall in many parts of the country, which poses a serious risk to rice yields and livelihoods in the region. Additionally, there is continued environmental degradation as deforestation for agricultural land is leading to widespread soil erosion due to run-off including loss of topsoil, depletion of soil nutrients, landslides, and heavy siltation of lowlands and waterways. Land clearance and environmental degradation are both putting local biodiversity at risk.• Integrated Resilient Rice Systems are improving livelihoods, food security and biodiversity in Madagascar, increasing average rice yields up to three times.• Improved rice varieties developed using climate-resilience traits such as drought tolerance were selected in participation with local communities, helping to increase adoption rates and ensure that introduced improved varieties meet local needs.• Reforestation efforts are more likely to succeed if they can generate long-term income for local communities beyond a project, for example, by planting agroforestry species with market demand to supplement income and to create incentives for sustainable management.• Improved farmer livelihoods from the use of on-farm genetic diversity in over 25 countries.• Increased land areas under sustainable management with intra-specific diversity on farms and in forest production including fruit and nut wild relatives in 25 countries.• Development of networks and institutions for community access to local crop and livestock genetic materials including community seedbanks and genebanks in Bolivia, Burkina Faso, China, Ecuador, Ethiopia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Malawi, Mali, Morocco, Nepal, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uganda, and Uzbekistan.• Policy gaps or constraints identified through using the tool have resulted in policy change including:• Protocols for benefit sharing and access to germplasm from the community genebanks and farmers' fields in Bolivia, Burkina Faso, China, Ecuador, Mali, Morocco, Nepal, and Uganda.• National governments of Morocco, Nepal, Uganda, and Uzbekistan, supporting agrobiodiversity and local seed systems.• Ministries of Agriculture and Education in Morocco and Uzbekistan including agrobiodiversity education, in middle school, and higher education technical schools.• Formal recognition of farmer breed varieties by the governments of Mali and Nepal.• Government policies for new reforestation targets that include local fruit and nut tree genetic diversity in Uzbekistan.Beneficiaries include development workers and researchers, together with farmer communities in 18 countries (Burundi, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, Germany, India, Italy, Malawi, Mexico, Morocco, Nepal, Niger, Pakistan, Peru, Tanzania, Uganda, USA, and Uzbekistan. The number of countries is growing. 60,000+ farmers have benefitted so far of which 30-60% were women (% depending on the country).Highlight: Integrating system-based approaches into food production and restoration effortsIncorporating biodiversity-based approaches into agriculture is a win-win as it can benefit ecosystem services which in turn benefit agricultural production, particularly when supported by enabling policies.• 1,137 hectares have been reforested to rehabilitate watersheds • 31 acres have been planted with agroforestry plants and farmers trained in agroforestry practices -reforestation efforts that generate livelihood options for farmers are more likely to be sustained.• Farmers have been trained on the use of rice straw as an energy source, increasing the use of rice byproducts and on using integrated pest management approaches.• Almost 2,500 farmers have been trained on producing and using organic compost although a spate of cattle theft in the area increased the rarity of cow dung, making compost production more expensive.• A replication and upscaling strategy has been developed and implemented in two other regions Good practices• 2,400 farmers trained on using resilient seed varieties and agroecological approaches to field preparation, fertilization, pest management, better livestock and land management, and post-harvest storage have been undertaken.The selection of three improved rice varieties that showed promise for climate resilience was carried out in participation with local communities. The project distributed almost 12,000kg of improved seeds and trained seed producer groups to increase access to improved varieties which resulted in the production of 26,000kg of improved seeds.• Training has been carried out at the regional and district levels on climate risk management and how to disseminate that knowledge to farmers including through better weather forecasting. Communication methods deployed include dynamic agricultural calendars to inform and adjust planting schedules based on seven-day climate forecasts which have been distributed to farmers and extension staff, as well as local radio forecasts twice a day. Two new weather stations have also been installed.• Water infrastructure for irrigation has been upgraded and 21km of canals have been dredged and cleared. 6km of dikes have been strengthened to prevent flooding. In one project site, water availability has increased between 28-55% near the dam. • Selecting tree lucerne as the most suitable fodder species was done in consultation with the International Livestock Research Center (ILRI) which manages the International Forage Genebank. Over 1,000 species of forage grasses, legumes, and food tree species are held in its collection.• Organization of farmers into eight groups in four sites in the Ethiopian highlands enabled training to targeted groups of both men and women, and of different social groups, on planning and managing tree lucerne on farms, and how to mix it with other local feed sources to feed dairy cows and sheep. Training was also given to farmers on how to use Tree lucerne to establish beekeeping for additional income.The project was enabled through the supportive policies of the government of Ethiopia around sustainable land and natural resource management which consider fodder trees and forages as part of watershed management initiatives.• Using tree lucerne as a pathway to improve rural livelihoods through its use as livestock fodder is helping to combat environmental degradation and boost local biodiversity.• Tree lucerne was selected from over 1,000 species held in the Forage Collection managed by ILRI as the most suitable for this project, showing the importance of conserving and studying plant genetic diversity as a source of options for sustainable development initiatives.• The project was successful because it addressed a key issue that was important to the farmers who became engaged and were willing to adopt tree lucerne as a fodder species.The project 'Improving rural livelihoods through the introduction of a multipurpose tree fodder' is a CGIAR project led by ILRI to introduce tree lucerne, a leguminous fodder tree, as a fodder species to boost livestock productivity in Ethiopia. Providing an affordable alternative to supplements through its nutritious leaves, tree lucerne was selected as it grows in high altitude areas and provides several ecological benefits for crops and other forage plants which grow in its vicinity, for example, contributing to soil fertility as a nitrogen-fixer and acting as a windbreaker to prevent soil erosion. Its scented flowers attract bees which supports honey-producing enterprises. It also supports wild biodiversity conservation by providing habitats for species such as birds and supports climate mitigation through carbon sequestration.In the Ethiopian highlands, grazing lands are shrinking and in some cases have disappeared as more land is used for crop production to feed a rapidly increasing human population. What remains is often degraded meaning that for livestock productivity to reach its potential, extra food and nutrition supplements are needed. For many smallholders, commercial concentrates are just too expensive so they use poor-quality crop residues, and even for those who can afford them, delivery issues limit availability. These constraints adversely affect the farmers' livelihoods.This project was made possible through the support of USAID.Checklist:Organization:© ILRI/ Kindu Mekonnen Organization:A GLOBAL COLLECTION OF GOOD PRACTICE CASES A GLOBAL COLLECTION OF GOOD PRACTICE CASES 29 28 Good practicesThe support of the local government has helped shape the initiative into a sustainable collective enterprise for green, local, and healthy living. The district has been declared a conservation district and as such, the local government is applying policies and supporting initiatives that generate good economic value and create conservation incentives to protect the forest and traditional agricultural practices including the women's market which now has a permanent home.The women have formed a committee to oversee activities at the market, establish rules, and agree on fair prices. They are applying a self-monitored Internal Control System to guarantee hygiene, reduce the use of plastic, and enhance the cultural aspects of the market. The initiative relies on close interactions between sellers and buyers and relations of knowledge and trust.• The women have also developed a traceability tool to collect lifecycle information on their produce to show information such as origin and organic credentials.The project 'Traditional markets for sustainable consumption, conservation, and women economic empowerment in Indonesia' is an initiative led by WWF which started in 2016 in collaboration with the Women Association and through local government support for women's enterprise and conservation The project supported the economic empowerment of indigenous smallholder women producers who had started businesses selling traditional nutritious varieties of vegetables and fruits grown from seeds inherited through generations as well as wild medicinal herbs and the occasional hunting catch. From selling door-to-door, the women had negotiated with a local landowner to start an informal market. This project helped the women to become better organized, develop and enforce quality standards and traceability tools, establish a permanent location for the market, and empower them economically and as agents of biodiversity conservation.• Empowering women through the sale of local agrobiodiversity builds resilience in communities and helps break the poverty cycle, for example, enabling them to pay for their children to pursue higher education.• Using agrobiodiversity as an entry point to boost women's livelihoods enhances their role and status as custodians of agrobiodiversity conservation, for example, of ancient crop varieties passed through generations and wild plants.• Enabling government policies that stimulate both women's enterprises and conservation can drive change towards more sustainable and equitable production and consumption of diverse traditional foods.The Women Association started with around 25 women from two villages and has evolved into a group of more than 100 traders who are working together to improve quality control and raise quality standards. This includes reducing the use of plastic bags and containers, safely disposing of garbage, increasing the cultivation and sale of local produce, and conserving local varieties. Moreover, the women traders in Malinau have been trained as trainers in quality control and implementing the principles of healthy, local, sustainable and fair markets and local supply chains.The women have shared their initiative and motivation with women in other villages in the province of North Kalimantan and the province of West Kalimantan which has significantly contributed to boosting average incomes.Checklist:Community InclusionInformal rural markets are a significant sector in developing countries and provide women with an opportunity to generate income and exit the poverty cycle, yet the lack of regulation limits their potential to meet the growing local demand for local vegetables, including the ones that their ancestors used to grow and harvest from the forest. The produce is fresh, grown from local seeds without the use of chemicals, with almost no carbon footprint, and the vegetables and fruit varieties on sale are unique to the area and not found anywhere else, yet the women lacked traceability tools to show its provenance and cultural links. 30This adaptation project executed by the Government of Gambia with support from UNEP and funding from the Green Climate Fund aims to build climate resilience over large areas, promote climate-resilient sustainable development, and create a sustainable natural resource-based economy that could directly benefit up to 8,376 Gambian households and indirectly benefit 30,800 households in four regions along the Gambia river. At the heart of this economic development is an ambitious restoration target of almost 16,000 hectares of degraded forests, mangroves, savannahs, wildlife areas, and farmland to improve ecosystem health, make food production more resilient, and protect bio-diversity. The nature-based economy will be developed through 176 commercial enterprises such as beekeeping, ecotourism, and food processing that will be managed by local communities.The project is also working to strengthen the implementation of existing policies for the participatory management and benefit-sharing of climate-resilient natural resources and integrating ecosystem-based management into national and local policies.• As part of efforts to rehabilitate 12,788 ha of degraded forest, savanna, and mangroves, and 3,000 ha of farmland, 10 million mangrove saplings have been planted, which protect coastal villages from storm surges while providing habitat for many fish species.• 60 beekeeping businesses, managed by local communities, have been established, supported by training in both beekeeping and business management. These new enterprises have created 398 jobs so far -121 of which are filled by women -and are helping to generate long-term sustainable income for the population.• Capacity building in approaches and techniques such as natural regeneration for planting has seen the survival rate of planted materials increase from 10-48% to almost 95% after three months of planting.Highlight: Natural-Resource-Based Economies -From Concept to Practice• To maintain restoration efforts, it is critical that local communities can generate incomes by adopting sustainable ecosystem-based approaches that maintain biodiversity and the natural resources upon which they depend. Following investment of almost USD 3 million in infrastructure development, the River Company has been established which is expected to employ more than 500 people through 176 new commercial enterprises over the next 20 years. This is estimated to increase the cash incomes of 8,376 households by at least USD 330 per year which is a lifeline in a country where 60% of the population live below the poverty line.•The River Company is predicted to have a cumulative gross cash return of USD 4,515,270 generated through the adoption of diversified, climate-resilient livelihood options including fisheries, agriculture, natural resource-based businesses, as well as the restored landscapes which are sources of raw materials that will be processed and traded by the natural-resource-based enterprises. It will provide around USD 677,270 in annual contributions to the National Forest Fund (NFF) through taxes and licensing fees.• To maintain restoration efforts, local communities need to be able to generate income from the conservation, management and sustainable use of local natural resources long after the project is completed. The 176 nature-based enterprises resulting from the project could increase cash incomes by USD 330 a year.• Restoration efforts that include farmland as well as wild areas to integrate food systems into sustainable resource management strategies mean increased resilience and biodiversity in both systems, as well as increasing food security.• Capacity building in using approaches and techniques such as natural regeneration for planting has seen the survival rate of planted materials increase from 10-48% to almost 95% after three months of planting.A woman surveys her crops in a village community garden.Climate change in the Gambia is resulting in increased temperatures, wind storms, coastal erosion, salt intrusion, erratic rainfall, droughts, and floods which in turn is leading to reduced agricultural and livestock production and unsustainable extraction of resources from forest ecosystems by rural households. The agricultural sector, which employs 44% of the country's workforce, is threatened because it is heavily rain dependent. Sea-level rise and salt intrusion into freshwater wetlands have all but eliminated rice production in the western half of the country, causing 'hunger seasons' between July and September.The 'Building a Natural-Resource-Based Economy in the Gambia River Basin' adaptation project is executed by the Government of Gambia with support from UNEP and funding from the Green Climate Fund.Checklist:Organization: Organization: 32 2.4 Terra-i -Using Satellite Imagery to Make Coffee Forest-Friendly in Vietnam Takeaways• Coffee production which provides livelihoods for smallholder producers is increasingly exposed to climate risks including longer droughts and less rain which can prevent crop flowering. At the same time unsustainable forest conversion to coffee plantations increases climate risks.• Integrating early-warning tools like Terra-i into forest monitoring systems can scale potential and encourage private sector investment in deforestation-free areas.• Multi-stakeholder workshops helped identify local actors' needs and constraints and identify a baseline and indicators of success. Other activities included identifying gaps that the data provided by Terra-I could fill and the data format needed by different stakeholders for it to be useful and encourage adoption.Terra-i is an early-warning forest monitoring system that deploys satellite imagery to detect changes in vegetation cover resulting from human activities.Vietnam has an organized forest inventory and a regular process for quantifying change in forests, but it needed a system that could provide data in almost real-time, to alert rangers to respond more quickly to incidences of illegal logging or encroachment. These incidences are increasingly happening due to the massive expansion in Vietnam's coffee production. From an almost nonexistent industry 30 years ago, it is now the world's second-largest producer with an export industry valued at $US3 billion. This project is part of efforts to make the country's coffee production more sustainable and reduce risks through emission reductions, forest conservation, land conversion, financial solutions, and various decision-support tools that contribute to Vietnam's commitments to the global development framework. It is part of the UN-REDD Vietnam Program Phase II.• Workshops held with policymakers, private sector representatives, forest rangers, civil society organizations, and ethnic minority groups helped identify local actors' needs and constraints, set a baseline and indicators of success, and identify gaps that the data provided by Terra-I could fill. Useful information gathered included the data format needed by different stakeholders, for example, most stakeholders wanted warning alerts to come through their phones and to be able to send feedback on whether the alerts were true or false on their phones as well.• Data from the first set of alerts was uploaded to Google and shared as a means of improving the system following comments and feedback, for example, by introducing a ranking system of high, medium, and low-priority alerts. As the project developed, a web-based platform was developed to communicate up-to-date detections to stakeholders.• As it was the first time the system had been implemented in the region, it was necessary to further calibrate the system with detailed information about the status of the Di Linh forest which required fieldwork to characterize the forests. The analysis included high-resolution optical satellite imageries and field geo-referenced observations.• Capacity building of local forest rangers through training sessions on how to interpret maps and tables of loss detections was followed by a validation exercise of forest loss detections. The team also worked with technical staff from the forest protection department to explore the integration of Terra-i into their monitoring work.The project has been carried out with the full support and engagement of local authorities and communities and work is ongoing to establish a mechanism to integrate Terra-i within the current government forest monitoring system to extend its scope to the national level.Highlight: Terra-i: A practical application for forest-friendly coffee production in Viet NamThe pilot project led to an agreement to upscale its use for forest monitoring at provincial and national levels in Vietnam. For example, the Lam Dong Provincial People Committee has adopted Terra-i and expanded its application at a provincial level.Civil society organizations, including the Centre for Sustainable Rural Development, have also recognized its use to promote participatory forest monitoring to enhance early detection of forest changes and empower communities to help protect the forests.Continued positive growth in the coffee sector will rely on international collaboration, with several organizations, including the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, working with the government, private sector, and smallholder farmers.The Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT supported the pilot application of the Terra-i system to monitor changes in forest land use, especially forest conversion to coffee plantations in Di Linh district, Lam Dong province, where forest encroachment is widespread and difficult to control. This project was carried out in partnership with the Vietnamese government and with partners at the World Meteorological Association and Australia. It was made possible thanks to funding through the International Climate Initiative of the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, and support from the EU.Community InclusionThrough research and partnerships, the Alliance supports work to make coffee production in Vietnam a sustainable source of prosperity for smallholder farmers.Vietnam has historically relied on ground patrols to detect illegal logging and encroachment. This costly method takes enormous numbers of staff to cover the country's large and difficult-to-access forest areas and is time-consuming, delaying the detection of illegal activities. Forest loss in the country also mostly happens in small-size sites before expanding into larger areas, so information needs to be in almost real-time and of high spatial resolution. Deploying Terra-i as an early-warning system linked to fast response times is a way to address both risks to the forest and the livelihoods of smallholder producers. • The project has directly benefitted and trained close to 4,500 farmers and other rural producers, a third of them being women, in supply chain enhancement and nature-based solutions. Some examples of investments include solar dehydrators to improve food storage, crop rotation systems, organic agriculture certification, aquaculture, and organic fertilizer production.The project created the MEBA biodiversity platform, an online tool that helps service providers integrate climate and biodiversity risks into credit decisions and use that information as basis to qualify for green credit lines.The project also developed 13 demonstrative farms in which ecosystem-based adaptation measures were implemented.• What is truly transformational about the MEbA approachis the fact that loan access and conditions (interest rates, payment periods, etc.) are tied to a series of indicators, including biodiversity and adaptive capacity, encouraging better stewardship of natural resources while improving production practices and reducing climate vulnerability. This combination of innovative finance mechanisms and ecosystem-based adaptation has been so successful that it is now being implemented in two African countries, Senegal and Benin, and under replication in other countries in Africa and Latin America.The project 'Microfinancing Ecosystem-based Adaptation to Climate Change' is a UNEP-led adaptation project implemented with funding from the German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (IKI).Checklist:Community InclusionThe project''Microfinance for Ecosystem-based Adaption to Climate Change (MEbA)' is a project in Latin America, the Caribbean, and Africa to help address risks to vulnerable populations from climate change and biodiversity loss. The project uses innovative microfinance services and products as an entry point to promote investment in agricultural systems that are ecosystem-based that can deliver improved climate resilience, protect and enhance biodiversity, and improve the livelihoods of smallholder farmers and other rural producers.The target project beneficiaries were local landholder populations with potential ecosystem-based projects in the areas of influence of the various participating Microfinance Institutions including the Andean region of Colombia and Peru, Benin, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, and Senegal.• In countries with national plans for climate change adaptation that promote ecosystem-based approaches, microfinance can be an entry point for leveraging investment in products that deliver ecosystem and rural livelihood resilience in rural populations that have been marginalized somewhat by insufficient financial inclusion.• Microfinancing Ecosystem-Based Adaption has supported the distribution of nearly 18,000 microcredits and benefitted around 4,500 farmers, funding products from solar panels to organic agriculture certification. More than USD 30 million has come from private investors.• Climate change risks and biodiversity loss are often not considered in agricultural finance packages. This can lead to missed opportunities to invest to enhance resilience to climate change and the ecosystem health of smallholder production systems.• Investments include solar dehydrators to improve food storage, crop rotation systems, organic agriculture certification, aquaculture, and organic fertilizer production. Products need to show they enhance ecosystems and the services they provide, and the social and economic resilience of human populations vulnerable to climate change.• Loan access and conditions (interest rates, payment periods, etc.) are tied to a series of indicators, including biodiversity and adaptive capacity, encouraging better stewardship of natural resources while improving production practices and reducing climate vulnerability.• 13 demonstration farms to show the value and function of ecosystem-based adaptation measures have been implemented.• Populations included in the project are in places with strong microfinance institutions that were already servicing them with other products.Climate change risks and biodiversity loss are often not considered in agricultural finance packages. This leads to missed investment opportunities to enhance resilience to climate change and the ecosystem health of smallholder production systems. Methodologies and technologies, as well as awareness and capacities of Financial Services Providers, are needed to carry out agricultural credit assessments that include climate risks and biodiversity considerations.• Evaluate accessions held in collections through a collaboration between genebanks, farmers, plant breeders, and other researchers to find the diversity that can help farmers and food production systems be more resilient to climate change.• Support national genebanks to reach international standards to ensure the collections are safe and widely available in the long-term including through safety back-ups of collections, the upgrade of equipment, improved internal processes such as documentation of data, and increased staff technical capacity.• Build and strengthen linkages with key user communities to make sure that new crop varieties are developed to meet their needs.The Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) houses the Genetic Resources Institute in Kenya which has been conserving seeds since 1988. It currently holds over 50,000 samples representing over 2,000 plant species acquired through donations and field collections carried out across Kenya. Like many other genebanks, it has been facing inconsistent funding and insufficient staff putting its collections at risk. Some of the seeds have been in storage for over 30 years and there are concerns that they could be losing viability.The Crop Trust, through the Seeds for Resilience project, is providing financial and technical support to help the Genetic Resources Institute meet international standards for seed conservation and data management. Alongside technical training and equipment upgrades, the project is also supporting the genebank to implement a new quality management system. An outreach component will also help the genebank work more closely with farmers and plant breeders.This project is being implemented by the Global Crop Diversity Trust in collaboration with partners including national genebanks and research institutes in the project countries. It was made possible through the generous support of the Federal Government of Germany (BMZ), through the German Development Bank (KfW).Community Inclusion Capacity Strengthening• Plant collections held in Africa's national genebanks may hold the genes needed to breed the climate-resilient crops farmers need both now and in the future, but secure funding, staff recruitment and training is needed to safeguard the collections in the long term and make them available to all.• Identifying and using useful traits held in the collections in breeding programs can increase the livelihoods, nutrition and resilience of farming households and their communities.• Collaboration between genebanks, farmers, plant breeders and other researchers is essential when evaluating samples held in collections to ensure new crop varieties developed really meet the needs of farmers.Seeds for Resilience provides financial, and technical support to secure the genetic diversity held in the national genebanks of Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, and Zambia and make it available to all to underpin the development of new varieties and crops, and the increased availability of crop diversity to farmers. Many of the accessions (samples) held are not found in genebanks anywhere else in the world such as many African green leafy vegetables and the African eggplant.The increased international availability of these seeds through enabling policies like the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and the development of climate-resilient crop varieties are expected to benefit farming households and their communities beyond the partner countries and the duration of the project.Smallholder producers in Africa -around half of whom are women -produce nearly 80% of the continent's food against a backdrop of increasingly unpredictable and extreme weather and changing growing seasons. They urgently need access to a wide range of affordable, quality seeds of productive and nutritious crop species and varieties that are resilient in the face of climate change. While crop improvement programs have released new varieties over the last decades, these have focused on just a small number of species, leaving the unique genetic diversity of many other resilient and nutritious crops untapped. This genetic diversity is being lost at unprecedented rates, particularly for vegetables and fruits. While some accessions are conserved in national genebanks, chronic underfunding and staff shortages place collections at risk.This UNEP-led project is enhancing the climate change resilience of rural communities living in five community-protected areas of Cambodia. It integrates food production into restoration activities to ensure long-term sustainability and diversify food production systems for increased resilience and reduced risks. The main entry point has been through establishing irrigated home gardens planted with diverse crops and supporting small livestock such as chickens, alongside restoration efforts that have included planting native trees that provide food or enhance soil health. The project worked closely with the communities in the protected areas at every step of the project including creating a Project Steering Committee to facilitate engagement between government ministries, civil society, provincial and district officers, and local agriculturalists and foresters.• Forest restoration approaches used multi-use native tree species that provide food, erosion control, timber, medicine, and fruit. The project also planted trees alongside 2,200 hectares of rice paddies to reduce erosion and enhance soil productivity.•The project has trained local households in sustainable income-generating strategies such as raising chickens and crickets, ecotourism, and selling vegetables.• Climate forecasts were used to inform and adjust planting schedules aiming for a 20% decrease in climate change vulnerability at all project sites, covering a population of 9,271 people.• 80% of the 1,900 households who participated report an improvement in access to water, to new seed varieties, and to improved rice storage techniques, as a result of additional interventions following the building of rainwater harvesting tankers and pumping wells.• Drought-tolerant rice varieties were distributed to families to increase yields -the varieties have genetic traits that are particularly adapted to local conditions.Training was given to households and schools to create home gardens of diverse crops including vegetables, which diversifies families' agricultural production which increases resilience, and reduces the risk of losing the harvest. Previously, when rice harvests failed due to drought, people had to sell their animals or possessions to buy food.In Kulen, a sacred and protected area in the Cambodian mountains, illegal logging of trees to fuel the luxury hardwood and charcoal markets has destroyed huge patches of forest, taking the rain clouds that used to gather over the trees with them.The project has eased people's reliance on rain-fed agriculture through the establishment of home gardens planted with diverse crops including vegetables that have year-round irrigation thanks to a small reservoir dug into springs a few kilometers up the mountain. This means that people no longer need to go into the forest to forage for roots when the rains fail. They also have chickens and have been trained in how to raise them. The vast majority of families in the village now have home gardens and fruit trees have been planted providing mangoes, jackfruit and avocados.A tree sapling nursery established through the project is helping one community grow 100,000 seedlings with additional saplings donated as part of a plan to plant more than a quarter of a million trees and protect 306 acres from illegal logging. • It is increasingly recognized that integrating people's needs into sustainable use strategies for protected land management, rather than separating people and protected areas, is the way forward. Most protected areas are already home to people, whether they are permanent residents, seasonal visitors or Indigenous Peoples.• Engagement between all stakeholders is critical for the long-term sustainability of restoration projects that integrate food systems, including working with local agriculturalists and foresters, and being aware of and respectful to the important cultural aspects of the protected areas.• Protected areas provide a vital safety net for species diversity, genetic diversity within species, habitats and ecosystems which includes vital plant species for food production systems.Organization:Climate change is producing erratic rainfall in Cambodia, where dry seasons are getting drier and wet seasons are wetter, causing devastating floods and droughts that can lead to crop failures and soil erosion, which is impacting rural livelihoods and food security. Only 19.5% of cultivated land in Cambodia benefits from irrigation, so the agricultural sector is dependent on rainfall. To counter drops in agricultural yields, communities rely on illegal logging in protected forests to supplement food and income, whether it be collecting fuelwood or timber. These decimated forests once provided both climate and soil water regulation in the agriculturally vital Mekong River Basin with a marked decrease in the number of rain clouds over the now depleted forest. 42Highlight: Developing Resilience in Drought-Tolerant GrasspeaDuring the evaluation work to assess the performance of crop wild relatives and their crosses under a range of conditions and climates in different countries, scientists in Morocco and Tunisia scientists identified a wild grasspea species that is resistant to two forms of broomrape, an aggressive parasitic weed led to the abandonment of the crop in some Mediterranean countries. These results may lead to its revival. Genetically related to today's cultivated crops, crop wild relatives have been left to evolve in the wild, developing traits such as drought tolerance and pest resistance that farmers need to face today's challenges. Yet we are losing them and many of those that remain are vulnerable to extinction, for example through land use change. While their wild habitats are disappearing through land use changes and degradation, they are poorly represented in genebank collections and undervalued in breeding programs. They also often fall outside conservation and agricultural agendas.• Carry out a global inventory of crop wild relatives already held in genebanks to prioritize collecting missions to fill gaps in collections, which were carried out through a multi-country, multi-partner effort which included 100 scientists from 25 countries. All relevant and applicable national, regional, and international regulations were followed by project partners in the collection of new diversity from within their borders. Collecting missions resulted in the conservation of 4,587 seed samples of more than 355 wild relatives of 29 key crops including, in the case of three wild potato relatives, the only examples held in any genebank.• Secure the safety and accessibility of the collected material by ensuring it is held in the national collections of the countries of origin, the Millennium Seed Bank, CGIAR international collections, and the Svalbard Global Seed Vault.• Conduct 19 pre-breeding projects in 43 countries -this means identifying desired genetic traits and introducing them into breeding lines that are crossable with modern varieties. These projects have resulted in new crop varieties with all materials available through the Multilateral System of the Plant Treaty.• Build information systems to manage and search global crop collections for crop wild relative data (Genesys) and information from the pre-breeding and evaluation projects via the Germinate platform.• Conduct capacity building and training on collecting, documenting, and conserving crops with more than 12,000 people from 124 institutions in 71 countries and carry out IT audits in 37 national and regional genebanks, 27 of which resulted in upgrades.and the Horn of Africa. 44 Good practices• Promotion of eco-friendly farming practices that include using more traditional locally adapted crop varieties in production systems to strengthen resilience • Four community seedbanks were established in four project sites to safeguard, better understand, and increase the use of local crop varieties and to conserve local knowledge about their traits and uses.• Capacity-building through diversity field schools and fairs in project sites to create awareness and mobilize local communities and stakeholders to use and conserve traditional crop biodiversity. In addition, the project developed and disseminated farmer-friendly training materials, community-based biodiversity management tools, and a field guide to diseases of the project crops.The project played a significant role in creating awareness of the value of traditional crop diversity including as a buffer against environmental change with over 70 publications in English and local languages.The main objective of the UNEP-led project on Integrating Traditional Crop Genetic Diversity into Technology: Using a Biodiversity Portfolio Approach to Buffer Against Unpredictable Environmental Change in the Nepal Himalayas was to maintain the conservation and use of crop biodiversity found in the mountain agricultural production landscapes of the country. The project's focus was to build resilience to climate change, boost ecosystem services and improve access and benefit-sharing capacity in the mountains' ecosystems. The project focused on eight neglected and underutilized species: buckwheat, cold-tolerant rice, common bean, finger millet, foxtail millet, grain amaranth, naked barley, and proso millet. These species were falling out of common use in local communities who were shifting to subsidized and more accessible staples like rice and wheat which are less adapted to the challenging growing conditions.• Traditional crops that have evolved over hundreds of years in some of the world most extreme landscapes have global importance for climate change adaptation and related challenges yet need protection through conservation and use programs.• Subsidizing major staple crops in food insecure areas while well-intended can displace resilient traditional crop varieties which are more adapted to local growing conditions.• Eco-friendly farming practices that use a diverse mix of locally adapted crops can strengthen resilience in production systems, acting as a buffer against environmental changes, and can be supported through community projects, for example, establishing seedbanks to conserve and manage locally adapted crop varieties and make seeds available to local farmers.• About 300 varieties of the eight target crops were evaluated in farm conditions out of which 60 have been used and promoted by farmers.• Seven superior farmer varieties of five crops (amaranth, finger millet, foxtail millet, proso millet and common bean) have been officially registered and promoted widely for enhancing access and benefit-sharing of smallholder farmers.• 500 local crop genetic resources are now safely stored in the national genebank for future use including breeding.• 20,000 households received benefits in the project sites and beyond through good quality seeds, germplasm, information on conservation, and the promotion of traditional crops.• Farmers including women who benefited from capacity-building activities have since been rewarded and recognized as biodiversity custodians in their communities.• Farmers accessed a low interest collateral free loan from a community biodiversity management trust fund created through the community seedbanks, to boost local livelihoods and self-finance the conservation of rare genetic resources.The project developed processing equipment (mainly electric threshers for proso millet) and promoted a finger millet thresher to over 500 households to improve processing efficiency. Climate-resilient traditional and nutritious crop varieties that have adapted to harsh conditions and high altitudes are the lifelines of the mountain communities that live in the Nepalese Himalayas. Yet many of these crops are at risk just when local communities need them most to build resilience and buffer against increasing unpredictability in weather, temperatures, and the increased frequency and severity of pests and pathogens. Better conservation and use of this crop genetic diversity has global implications for improved food security in other high-altitude areas of high environmental instability and variability.The Seeds for Needs approach started in Ethiopia in 2012 working on durum wheat -the wheat used to make pasta -and has since expanded to become a global project, implemented in 15 countries in a range of contexts and with a diverse range of crops. Led by the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, this innovative approach brings a diverse portfolio of seeds including traditional farmer varieties to rural communities to give the farmers and their households a say in which varieties best meet their needs. As Ethiopia is experiencing frequent droughts that are damaging crops and livestock, threatening the livelihoods and food security of millions of people, identifying the varieties that are best suited to the harsh climates and that farmers will adopt is becoming increasingly urgent. The varieties bred through the project, including two farmer varieties of durum wheat, have been officially registered and released following national protocol procedures.• Over 850 Ethiopian durum wheat landraces and several Ethiopian improved lines underwent extensive molecular and phenotypic characterization through the project resulting in a shortlist of 373 varieties from genebanks and 27 improved varieties from farmers' fields. These were tested and ranked by both farmers and researchers. More than 20% of traditional Ethiopian wheat varieties performed better than commercially released varieties showing the importance of using as much diversity as possible in breeding programs.• Ranking of traits by farmers included a variety of measures beyond standard ones like yield and drought tolerance, for example, taste and texture. These rankings were combined with researchers' evaluations, resulting in a final shortlist of 20 varieties from 50 that were crossbred with an elite variety of durum wheat called Asassa. These were grown and ranked by farmers in real conditions. This ranking was important for the future adoption of any varieties bred through the project.•The varieties became part of the portfolio of newly established community seedbanks, created in the target regions as an important source of high-quality seeds for the communities.The varieties were also tested for how they perform in pasta production working with Italian companies and institutions. This activity was to generate the basis for future value chains that will further promote their future conservation and use.• An impact study showed that the Seeds for Needs initiative led to a significant improvement in improving on-farm production diversity, and enhanced food security among smallholder farmers in the study regions • Collaborations with universities, including in Italy, have built capacity and expertise at various levels with ten PhD levels and 15 MSc levels reached, as well as thousands of farmers trained through the project.Two durum wheat varieties whose local names mean 'Stable' and 'We Have It Back!' have been officially registered and released through the project, targeting farmers operating in marginal production areas. The varieties are drought-tolerant, give high yields and have good nutritional traits. Wehabit had been lost from the community until it was rediscovered in the genebank and reintroduced through the project.These are just two examples of the many varieties in the pipeline for future breeding programs that have come from this project. So far, more than 50,000 farmers have received seeds through the project's crowdsourcing approach.The varieties were released using the standard procedures for variety release in Ethiopia. In other words, they had to be compared to the best improved varieties available for the target areas with evaluation done by the breeders. A variety can only be released if it outperforms them otherwise it is rejected. The significance of the process is that it shows how traditional varieties can outperform improved varieties in certain environments. However, the process is not ideal, as it is costly and cumbersome to follow this procedure and only allows the release of a very limited number of varieties, while the aim is to constantly inject new varieties that can keep pace with climate change. Specific protocols for traditional varieties release remain a priority not only in Ethiopia, but in Africa in general.This project was carried out through ITPGRFA and with the support of GIZ and the World Bank.Public-Private Sector Partnerships Checklist:Community Inclusion• For farmers to adopt and use crop varieties that can build resilience into their production systems, it is critical to include them at all stages of the development, evaluation and selection process to boost adoption rates and ensure the varieties deliver what the farmers and their communities need.• Using the genetic diversity safeguarded in genebank collections and farmers' fields creates new opportunities for breeding that traditionally relies on a narrow tried and tested selection of genetic materials.• Partnering with the private sector to establish future value chains is important to promote the future cultivation of traditional varieties, ensuring their conservation through use.Past efforts to introduce new varieties to farmers have not always been successful with a major reason being that farmers had not been included in the variety development, evaluation, and selection process. Gathering important information about farmer-preferred traits, for example, taste or texture in traditional recipes is critical to developing the right varieties, and also opens new possibilities in terms of using a wide selection of genetic diversity available in genebanks and farmers' fields that is not normally considered in breeding programs.Targets: 2, 4, 9, 10, 14, 16, Millions of people face hunger and micronutrient deficiencies, which means they lack the essential vitamins and minerals they need for healthy development, such as Vitamin A deficiency.Yet 75% of the world's food is generated from just 12 plants and five animal species meaning many options are off the menu that could help deliver not just diverse, safe, affordable diets all year round and help deliver planetary health and resilience in our food production systems. Consumer education is also critical to influence production, whether through awareness campaigns, product labeling, or public procurement mechanisms, for example, linked to school feeding programs.Catchment, Lake Naivasha, Kenya.Organization:A GLOBAL COLLECTION OF GOOD PRACTICE CASES A GLOBAL COLLECTION OF GOOD PRACTICE CASES 51 50The Sustainable Diner is an innovative private-public sector partnership led by WWF to reduce CO2 emissions by tackling food waste and other SCP principles. The project targets tourism and dining out which are two of the Philippines' fastest-growing sectors. Tourism alone supports the livelihoods of over 12 million people. It is part of a set of policy changes to support sustainable local development across a range of sectors supported through the International Climate Initiative. By using food waste as an entry point, the project is assisting the food service sector to transition to low-carbon, sustainable food consumption and production practices across all its activities.Due to economic growth domestically, many Filipinos are now able and willing to spend on higher-value goods and services, including better-quality meals, ready-to-eat food delivery services, and new restaurant trends. As a result, meat consumption has increased which has a higher carbon and environmental footprint than traditional dietary options, while its vegetable intake is the lowest in Asia. Yet this is also a country where almost 25% of the population lives below the poverty line and where, despite widespread hunger and food insecurity, large amounts of food are being wasted. In Metro Manila alone, 800,000 tons of food waste end up in trash bins every year.• Private sector partnerships can help scale awareness-raising and incentivize carrying out sustainable consumption and production principles in business operations, as well as strengthen the business case for reducing food waste and implementing sustainable practices.• Support of the national and local governments has led to the project influencing and advising on policy decisions including the National Sustainable Consumption and Production Framework and the National Food Waste Guidelines.• Targeting consumers through educational and awareness campaigns about the impact of their dietary choices, such as choosing diverse local foods, will also contribute to the long-term sustainability of the project.• The project, working through the Hotel and Restaurant Association (HRAP), is supporting restaurants and hotels to offer more sustainable dining options through local food sourcing and procuring products with a reduced carbon footprint, for example, water and energy efficiency and avoidance of single-use plastics. Tools developed such as the WWF Hotel Kitchen Toolkit provide advice on ways to reduce food waste, for example, through more efficient menu planning and accurate guest counts.The initiative is also targeting young consumers through an educational campaign about the impact of their dietary choices, such as choosing diverse local foods, and plant-based options instead of meat, through information materials for primary, secondary, and tertiary teachers and efforts to integrate sustainability issues into school curricula.In partnership with the private sector, the National Eco-Labelling Program -Green Choice Philippines -was revisited to include new criteria to strengthen sustainability practices across food and health safety, nutrition, environmental management, and resource efficiency. Partnerships were also forged with 24 restaurants in three cities and with industry platforms that could act as multipliers, raising awareness of the project.• To incentivize companies, a cost-benefit analysis was conducted to provide the business case for reducing food waste and implementing sustainable practices.• Policy advocacy achievements included influencing or contributing towards several bills, policies, and guidelines such as the Food Surplus Reduction Bill, the National Sustainable Consumption and Production Framework, the National Food Waste Guidelines, and an MoU with the Department of Tourism to mandate sustainability training for the food service industry.This project was carried out with the support of the International Climate Initiative.Public-Private Partnerships Checklist:Organization:A GLOBAL COLLECTION OF GOOD PRACTICE CASES 53 52Good practicesThe program is adaptable which means its impacts have reached beyond the classroom as it moved online in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These adaptations ultimately helped set the scene for scale-up as the digital version of The Picnic Basket could travel to more schools across the three countries and hopefully, outside of these countries as well.• An added benefit of changing parts of the program to an online version for WWF-Greece and WWF-Romania was that it aided the work of measuring impact including some impressive results:• 92% improvement in dietary habits, including a 23% increase in the consumption of fruit and vegetable snacks and 18% in the consumption of homemade snacks (Romania)• 20% increase in fruit and vegetable snack consumption and a 15% reduction in food waste (Greece)• Up to 100% of teachers were happy to recommend the tool to fellow teachers and planned to implement it in the following school year (both).The COVID pandemic provided an opportunity to learn about the importance of testing assumptions e.g., it was never considered that schools could be closed. Design thinking helps work through these assumptions and incorporate helpful steps to improve the design.• Based on the success of the innovation project there are plans to scale up the work with more schools, more students, and more families within each country, and hopefully in more countries across the WWF Network.• There are plans to further invest in the digital version of The Picnic Basket as a simple and fast way to expand the work within schools with tools that are already available.Public-Private PartnershipsChecklist:The projectThe Picnic Basket is a tool to teach children aged 5-11 about sustainable food systems, sustainable diets, and food waste. It adopts a mix of experimental learning, play, and cooking as ways to switch snacking habits towards more sustainable choices and deepen the engagement of students, teachers, and parents on these issues. The program includes teaching materials for the classroom in the form of a real picnic basket filled with games and learning resources to teach sustainable eating habits, promote homemade food and eliminate food waste.Unsustainable food production is a primary contributor to biodiversity loss and a major driver of climate change yet one-third of food produced goes to waste. Further, poor dietary habits are on the rise. The best moment to shape an individual's taste for sustainable and healthy food and introduce behaviors to prevent food waste is in early childhood.• Education programs on the importance of eating sustainable diets and reducing food waste that target early years have the best chance of behavior change.• Promoting sustainable diets and reducing food waste helps delivers biodiversity conservation goals.• Adaptable project planning can reap rewards -going digital in response to COVID restrictions led to better measurements of outcomes in two of the project countries and expanded access to the educational materials.A sample of the Picnic Basket by WWF.practice eco-friendly habits. 544.3 Naturbeteskött -The Meat Label Helping to Restore Sweden's Semi-Natural Grasslands Takeaways• Restoring and managing semi-natural grasslands including their use for grazing is an environmentally friendly way to produce dairy and meat that also increases wild biodiversity.• Certification schemes that show the green credentials of food products including meat and dairy help guide consumers who are increasingly guided by environmental concerns when making purchasing decisions.• Farmer incentives such as grants, capacity building and access to markets including through public-private partnerships are critical to support transition in food production systems as are enabling policies like the Common Agriculture Policy and the Strategic Plan which support management of semi-wild grasslands and investments in animal housing.In 1989 WWF Sweden started setting up semi-natural pasture projects in several locations to safeguard resting places for migratory birds and to protect local biodiversity. Grazed natural pastures in Sweden have a high biodiversity of plants, insects, and birds -on average 40 species per square meter. This work led to the realization that reintroducing traditional pastoral systems could present an opportunity to restore the grasslands and produce high-quality meat products with green credentials resulting in Naturbeteskött (natural pasture meat), a national label to help consumers who make eco-purchasing decisions when it comes to their food.In Sweden, as in many other places around the world, seminatural grasslands have declined by more than 95%. One of the main drivers is a shift from traditional pastoral systems for milk and cattle production to intensive feeding and indoor rearing. This means the grasslands are no longer grazed resulting in the encroachment of bushes and trees and a loss of biodiversity. As semi-natural grasslands are one of the most environmentally friendly ways to produce meat, the idea of producing beef and lamb on extensive high conservation value grasslands is supported by both politicians and environmental agencies.• WWF worked with beef and dairy producers to form farmer groups in different parts of Sweden and supported the transition to using grazing in their production systems, for example, through grants for fencing, financial support to restore grazing lands, and working with landowners to release land for grazing.The project developed a third-party quality assurance certification -Naturbeteskött 2 -for grass-fed meat. The scheme was launched in 2008 and got a significant number of farmers interested in joining the scheme, as well as helping them to find markets for their certified meat and milk including through a national partnership with Coop Sweden.• Early producers of Naturbeteskött, together with WWF, spent considerable time working with chefs and food journalists to build recognition of the brand as a premium product.Checklist:In Sweden, semi-natural grasslands have declined by more than 95%.Organization:A GLOBAL COLLECTION OF GOOD PRACTICE CASES A GLOBAL COLLECTION OF GOOD PRACTICE CASES 57 56• Business Sector: Working closely with the Indonesia Business Council for Sustainable Development, the project worked with the private sector to develop sustainable procurement guidelines and encouraged companies to incorporate sustainability principles into their strategic plans and operations.• Consumers: The project was built upon WWF Indonesia's consumer campaign Beli Yang Baik (Buy what's Good) to convey the concept of sustainable palm oil consumption to the Indonesian public. Domestic consumers account for 30% of the oil produced, mostly for cooking (60%). Cooperation with civil society organizations including the Earth Hour community and the Indonesian Organic community increased the campaign's reach while media trips helped to raise awareness of the negative consequences of conventional palm oil production.• Policymakers: To advance progress toward Indonesia's climate targets, the project provided support to policymakers by developing strategies to reduce GHG emissions in the palm oil sector including mitigation measures for the agricultural sector developed with the participation of the government, the private sector, scientific institutions, and civil society organizations• Engaging all stakeholders from governments to indigenous people is essential to minimize tradeoffs between economic growth and the destruction of uniquely biodiverse natural ecosystems and the services they provide to people, like clean water, carbon sequestration and CO2 emission reduction.• Targeting consumers as well as producers with campaigns about the importance of purchasing sustainably produced products such as palm oil is critical to create change through consumer demand, particularly when it comes to targeting domestic consumers who can closely relate to local impacts.• While palm oil production does generate jobs, these are frequently precarious and tainted by exploitation, which keeps prices low. Sustainability standards need to include labor and human rights provisions as well as environmental ones which requires engagement with many stakeholders from local communities including Indigenous Peoples to the private sector.Highlight: Multi-stakeholder Engagement for UptakeFor successful integration of sustainable consumption and production principles into business practices, policies and consumer choices, the project showed the vital role that bringing together and communicating with different stakeholders can bring including:• Engaging businesses in high-level meetings facilitated collaboration between retailers and brand owners that led to commitments between SuperIndo -one of the largest supermarket chains in Indonesia -and the Roundtable of Sustainable Palm Oil Producers (RSPO) resulting in the introduction of sustainable palm oil products. Sustainable Sourcing Guidelines were also published through the project and adopted by a range of sectors from food retailers to the hospitality industry.• Targeting consumers through a range of channels including through radio shows, cooking demonstrations, ecomarkets and movie screenings. Consumer power is an important driver of change and can help overcome resistance to align development policies to SDGs and climate targets.• Working with community partners to assess their capacity, commitment, and readiness to implement projectrelated activities including through a Memorandum of Understanding signed in 2019 between WWF-Indonesia and the Government of West Java Province to increase public awareness on sustainable palm oil by collaborating with community organizations.The project is supported by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV) of Germany.Checklist:Community InclusionThe project Indonesia has seen exponential economic growth in the last decade which has cut the poverty rate in half, to just under 10%. Government policies to develop infrastructure, improve logistical efficiency and promote exports have led to an unprecedented expansion of the agriculture and food sector, in particular, the cultivation of high-yielding palm which is produced for its oil. Indonesia has become the world's largest exporter of palm oil, a product used in a vast array of products from chocolate to detergent to diesel fuel. This project worked to minimize tradeoffs between economic growth and the loss of uniquely biodiverse ecosystems and the services they provide by taking a three-pronged approach to integrating sustainable consumption and production principles into business practices, government policies, and consumer choices.Indonesia has the third largest tropical rainforest on the planet (94.1 million hectares), as well as the largest tropical peatlands (14.9 million hectares) and vast tracts of mangrove forests (3.31 million hectares). These natural resources store enormous amounts of carbon. The boom in palm oil has come at an incredible cost to nature, through the conversion of immense extensions of tropical forest and peatland in one of the world's most unique biodiversity hotspots, with land clearing and burning frequently accounting for most of the country's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions -almost 80% in 2015. In addition, while the economic benefits from palm oil have contributed to rural poverty alleviation, jobs generated have been characterized by precariousness and exploitation and land conflicts with regular reports of local communities and indigenous peoples.4.5 Biodiversity for Food and Nutrition in Brazil, Kenya, Sri Lanka, and Turkey• Biodiversity for food and nutrition is an often-overlooked link between agriculture and health, with indigenous species ranging from Brazilian vitamin-rich fruits to African leafy vegetables representing a valuable resource to reduce malnutrition and improve livelihoods.• Public procurement schemes that incentivize production of a diverse range of foods, for example, through school feeding programs, are critical to diversify production systems.• Biodiversity for Food and Nutrition has helped generate changes in behaviors and attitudes within a range of partner ministries and federal institutions of the project by working in close collaboration with them, for example, inviting representatives of strategic policy programs to be part of national steering and executing committees.The Biodiversity for Food and Nutrition project (BFN) was a multi-country initiative aimed at strengthening the conservation and sustainable management of agricultural biodiversity in four megadiverse countries -Brazil, Kenya, Sri Lanka, and Turkey. The initiative used a three-pronged approach to i) increase evidence of the nutritional value and cultural importance of local underutilized nutritious foods, ii) better link research to policy to ensure diverse foods are considered in national food and nutrition security strategies and actions, and iii) improve consumer awareness on the benefits of these alternative foods to encourage their incorporation in diets, food systems, and markets.• Evidence: Nutrition and food composition data were collected for 195 species, contributing to national food composition tables and the FAO/In Foods Database. Publications and online databases along with recipes and traditional knowledge are accessible to a wider audience. Collaboration with over 50 national universities and agencies established for data collection across the four countries, leading to the generation of new food composition data and the update of national food composition tables and databases. Four communities in Kenya, 121 villages in Turkey, quilombola communities in the Centre-West region of Brazil, and communities at the three pilot sites in Sri Lanka provided information used to document traditional knowledge associated with the target species.• Policy: BFN led the revision of Brazil's National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP), engaging 400 participants from institutions across the business, environment, academia, federal and state government sectors as well as indigenous peoples and traditional communities and included the conservation of biodiversity for food and nutrition as an indicator of biodiversity health in the national revisions to the NBSAP 2020-2021. In addition, BFN supported the formulation of key policies including two Biodiversity Ordinances in Brazil and the first-ever Biodiversity Conservation Policy in Kenya.The project increased the value given to biodiversity by consumers and producers while expanding market capacity. Examples include a farm-to-school direct procurement model, Sri Lankan-women-led traditional food businesses, farmer business school, gastronomy events such as the Wild Herb Festival in Turkey, cooking workshops, nutritionist training, educational and green job training initiatives, recipe books, and an online course, and a toolkit, to help mainstream biodiversity for food and nutrition.Agricultural biodiversity is important for food and nutritional security, as safety against hunger, a source of nutrients for improved dietary diversity and quality and strengthening local food systems and environmental sustainability. Brazil, Kenya, Sri Lanka, and Turkey are among the world's most mega-diverse countries thanks to the extraordinary diversity of ecosystems and species existing within their borders. They each contain unique biological diversity and have associated traditional ecological knowledge that supports a large proportion of the world's food supply in a range of ecosystems that are global priorities for conservation. Due to the fact that the biodiversity in these four participating countries is so vast, the use of these indigenous, largely plant, genetic resources is still scarcely explored, appreciated, or conserved.Highlight: Enabling Policies to Mainstream Biodiversity for Food and Nutrition• Evidence: Food composition data of 78 underutilized species added to the national database; 12 MSc dissertations and 3 PhD thesis dissertations published in collaboration with federal universities.• Awareness: Gastronomic events featured celebrity chefs using native crops, indigenous species featured on school textbook covers, mainstreaming biodiversity for food and nutrition online course. Checklist:Display of bananas and plantains.In Africa, bananas are a major staple and livelihood crop. The daily consumption of cooking bananas in Uganda, Burundi, and Rwanda -plantains and East African Highland bananas -can reach as many as 11 bananas in a day per person, while in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) they are consumed up to four times in a week. As the banana is eaten in such large quantities, introducing varieties that naturally have a higher content of provitamin A carotenoids -plant pigments that the body converts into vitamin A -is a way to tackle the deficiency that is so widespread in the region. For some banana varieties, particularly orange fleshed varieties, eating just two a day can meet 100% of the daily recommended intake for children under five. To this end, the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT has been fast-tracking vitamin-A-rich banana varieties for over a decade and integrating them into rural communities' farming systems and diets.• The first step was to screen more than 400 varieties to identify those with high levels of carotenoids. Bananas are notoriously difficult and expensive to breed, so 'fast-tracking' existing vitamin-A-rich varieties for testing in this way offers savings of both time and money.• A shortlist of 15 banana varieties from Ghana, Papua New Guinea, and the Philippines, were evaluated in different growing environments in Burundi and Eastern DRC for agroecological performance such as yield, taste, and texture.For communities to adopt the introduced varieties, they must grow under local conditions, work well in a range of traditional recipes, and appeal to children.• Evaluations were accompanied by awareness creation activities on the importance of vitamin A in diets for healthy development and capacity building, for example, cooking demonstrations. These kinds of activities stimulate consumer demand which increases adoption and market demand which gives added incentives for farmers to cultivate the introduced varieties. Key message booklets and factsheets have been co-developed to ensure they are community friendly, translated into local languages, and disseminated through partners.• 12,000 farmer households have been reached so far with information on the sustainable use of vitamin-A-rich banana varieties and approximately 20,000 plantlets of five varieties selected from the evaluation trials have been distributed.In addition, farmers are sharing the bananas and planting materials within their communities.• Next steps include studies to establish the bio-efficacy of provitamin A carotenoids and their contribution to vitamin A body stores following regular consumption of diets based on the bananas selected and used in the project. Results from this study will fill the final piece of the puzzle and enhance efforts toward scaling adoption of the vitamin-A-rich bananas.The Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO) and the World Health Organization have identified vitamin A deficiency as a major public health problem in many developing countries. It increases the risk of disease and death from severe infections in children, contributes to poor pregnancy outcomes among women, and is the leading cause of preventable blindness in children. The prevalence of vitamin A deficiency in East Africa is around 35% despite efforts towards supplementation and biofortification and around 40% of children are affected.is the bananas found in most Western supermarkets.Organization:3 Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services | IPBES secretariatTargets: 2, 4, 9, 10, 13, 16,The IPBES Global Assessment Report 3 released in 2019 and presented to the Convention on Biological Diversity generated international headlines on the potential loss of one million species by 2050. These species include the thousands of plant, animal, and fish species as well as the varieties, breeds, and strains found within those species, and those that contribute to ecosystem health, upon which our food systems depend.Conserving agrobiodiversity is critical to give people the options they need to adapt to climate change, fill nutrient gaps, and be resilient to emerging pests and diseases. As well as conserving the genetic diversity that underpins our food systems whether in genebanks, on farms or in the wild, it is critical also to conserve the traditional knowledge about its uses and cultivation methods. Integrating wild and agricultural biodiversity conservation strategies can also be an effective approach although the two agendas often remain separate despite having similar goals.Colours and shapes show the great diversity of local products. La Cocha, Colombia Northern Andes Ecoregion.Central Asia is the center of origin and domestication for many temperate fruit and nut species of global significance. Its mountain slopes are home to selected varieties and wild species of, apple, apricot, grape, peach, pear, pistachio, plum, pomegranate, walnuts, and others. These locally developed traditional varieties are adapted to local environments, increasing both resilience in agroecosystems and farmers' livelihoods. The project -In Situ/On-Farm Conservation and Use of Agricultural Biodiversity (Horticultural Crops and Wild Species) in Central Asia -targeted horticultural crops and wild fruit species for sustainable development, food security, and environmental resilience in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan.• Hundreds of native fruit and nut tree species and their genetic traits developed over millennia are now safely conserved in farmers' orchards in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan and being used to generate livelihood benefits. These nutritious and resilient species are also beneficial to ecosystem health including carbon sequestration and nutrient recycling.• The regional approach taken working with the countries to tackle shared problems in transboundary ecosystems has proved effective and efficient, improving cooperation and reducing duplication of effort. Moreover, farmers, research institutes, and local communities were equipped with capacity and skills to conserve in situ/on-farm horticultural crops and wild fruit species in Central Asia.• Tree nurseries, inspired by the project, have distributed hundreds of thousands of saplings across the region, improving livelihoods, increasing food availability and helping to restore degraded environments.• A wide range of stakeholders was brought together from different countries to approach the challenge from a regional perspective that considered the transboundary nature of the ecosystems, habitats, and the globally significant species and their wild relatives in their center of origin and diversity. This included the creation of a regional steering committee to ensure that agreed common purposes, activities, and outcomes were followed and to provide necessary governance of the project at national and regional levels, for example, regular monitoring and reporting to the regional level.The project leveraged its regional scope to ensure that farmers from different countries had the opportunity to exchange insights on different aspects of the cultivation and processing of fruits and nuts. For example, in Uzbekistan, farmers were introduced to a new technology for planting pistachio trees with a covered root system that extends the planting season for two months.• Through consultation with a wide range of stakeholders including scientists, policymakers, farmers, foresters, and users of forest products, a shortlist of 12 endemic perennial priority fruit and nut tree species was created -almond, apple, apricot, cherry plum, currants, fig, mulberries, peach, pear, pistachio, pomegranate, sea buckthorn, and walnutto allow in-depth work on their conservation and sustainable use. Farmers' associations were promoted to maintain local varieties of horticulture crops and wild fruit species.Wild apricot sampling process in Chichkan gorge, Kyrgyzstan.• National project teams prepared and delivered training programs on a wide range of agricultural biodiversity conservation topics for researchers and educators, farmers, managers of protected areas, and policymakers. At each target site, the teams worked closely with local leaders among farmers and forest users to build capacity in using biodiversity for food production and to supply planting material. Farmers also worked in collaboration with researchers on diversity assessments of local varieties of fruit and nut trees. A critical aspect was to connect farmers' conservation strategies with extension services to increase the benefits of managing biodiversity to improve the welfare of rural populations.• An educational campaign raised awareness among farmers, policymakers, the media, and the general public about the value of indigenous fruit and nut-bearing tree diversity.These species remain economically and socially significant in the region providing the current population with a consistent supply of valuable foods and income, especially in unirrigated and drier areas, and supporting soil stabilizing through their root systems, among other environmental functions. Each country derives direct benefits from these species and because of the nature of the transboundary ecosystems, they also benefit from coordinated approaches to sustain the diversity of the species and their habitats. Estimates suggest that globally 80% of the seeds on which smallholder farmers in developing countries depend are self-produced and obtained through local channels of distribution and exchange. This high level of farmer seed autonomy masks the fact that almost everywhere local seed systems are under stress. Agricultural intensification, commoditization, privatization of natural resources, and the expansion of corporate power in the life science industries (including the seed industry) are among the forces impacting smallholder agriculture. Large-scale rural-to-urban migration is contributing to a decline in farming in many countries or transforming small-scale family farming into contract farming. These trends are affecting seed conservation, production, selection, storage, distribution, and exchange. Although in many areas farmers continue to maintain a diversity of crops and crop varieties, significant reductions, in terms of numbers as well as area sown or planted, are occurring.• The number of community seedbanks is increasing around the world; they are taking on multiple functions, such as conserving, restoring, revitalizing, strengthening, adding value to and improving local seed systems. Women play key roles in community seed banking.• Community seedbanks conserve large numbers of diverse local crop varieties, including major and minor food crops, and neglected and underutilized crop species. They complement the conservation efforts of the national genebanks, although not always receiving the recognition and support they deserve.• Community seedbanks can be strong partners in national conservation strategies and systems, but they require more policy, legal, financial, organizational, and technical support. In some countries, community seedbanks have established a formal collaboration agreement with the national genebank to create synergy toward a national conservation system.Conservation 73 demonstration plots/orchards were established in all five partner countries where 436 traditional varieties of fruit and 117 genotypes of wild nut tree crops are maintained in situ and on farm. 59 tree nurseries have also been established to improve farmers' access to diversified germplasm and increase understanding about management practices of local varieties among farmers. These nurseries supply 1.5 million saplings of local fruit crop varieties and 100,000 saplings of wild fruit and nut species annually.National rosters of local varieties of fruit, nut-bearing tree crop and grapevine varieties were developed that include information on the genetic diversity and the farmers (diversity custodians) who maintain it on their farms. The national roster in Uzbekistan includes information on 185 custodians who maintain 433 local varieties, in Tajikistan -118 custodians who maintain 219 varieties, in Turkmenistan, 97 farmers who grow 142 local varieties in their orchards, in Kyrgyzstan -47 custodians maintain 136 varieties. Checklist:Capacity developmentCommunity seedbanks:• Have multiple seed system functions including conservation, providing access and availability, sharing seeds and related knowledge, adding value, and establishing linkages with other seed system actors.• Contribute to the adaptive capacity of farmers and communities (in particular concerning climate change), through several strategies: conserving a portfolio of diverse seeds of crops and crop varieties; conserving seeds from plants that have a high capacity to survive under extreme weather conditions; restoration of 'lost' varieties with particular good adaptation potential; accessing novel diversity not conserved locally, and accessing seeds from areas where plants have adapted to extreme weather conditions. Bridging traditional knowledge with modern science to strengthen technical and organizational aspects, e.g., through the use of locally available botanical repellents (to keep away infectants), airtight containers (to store seeds), zeolite beads (to dry seeds), and seed registers (to track seed flows in and out of the community seedbank).• Add value to the conservation function through participatory crop improvement, e.g., evaluating varieties for their adaptive capacity and/or nutritional values; seed production and marketing of good performing varieties and/or varieties with high market demand; and the provision of educational services, e.g., training of other farmers interested to establish a community seedbank.The project 'Empowering Conservation Stewards in Grasslands' is a WWF project in South Africa to incentivize and reward communities for sustainably managing the grasslands that cover nearly a third of the country. Grasslands have a critical role in providing water security and supporting the livelihoods and food security of rural communities including through resilience to climate change. They also support the habitats and connectivity of many wild plant, animal, and aquatic species. Since 2015, WWF has worked with rural communities and commercial farmers in the grasslands to ensure the communities benefit from the outcomes of the landscapes that they sustainably manage through the adoption of voluntary agreements.The rich biodiversity in the grasslands and the continued provision of ecosystem services that they provide to people are under pressure from large-scale agriculture, mining, invasive species, poor fire management, and overgrazing for livestock. Two of the 80 vegetation types found here are classified as critically endangered, 18 as endangered, and 27 as vulnerable, while 83% of its river ecosystems are ranked as threatened or critically endangered. Despite their critical role in supporting biodiversity and rural populations, only 4% of grasslands are protected.• Empowering communities through incentives to sustainably manage land can result in the effective conservation of the natural resources used by the communities who in turn benefit from ecosystem health and the services it provides.• Voluntary agreements drawn up between a range of stakeholders protect the interests of the community and landowner stewards.• Government support and enabling policies including the National Environmental Management Protected Areas Act recognize the role that communities play in managing protected areas and the biodiversity it contains and ensure local communities maintain access to their lands through private protected area management.• Voluntary agreements have been drawn up that empower the local communities who manage the lands to benefit from doing so, for example through land management plans that ensure sustainable livestock production, economic growth, and biodiversity stewardship. These plans have been developed in collaboration with the communities and other key local stakeholders including the South African National Parks and Provincial Conservation Agencies.• Capacity-building with local landowners and farmers is ensuring efficient land management which is supported by expanded grassland protection schemes and investments in restoration.•The project has placed community engagement at the heart of its strategy working in 13 focal community sites, representing 11,500 people, and catalyzing over 200,00 ha of land under stewardship. One of the community stewardship projects, the Mgundeni, is recognized as the only successful land reform and livestock initiative by the district municipality.Checklist: • Through the project, farms in the two reserves have been characterized to map and identify crop and livestock diversity, main agroecological conditions, and social issues. Data on biodiversity, including wild species and cultivated varieties, agricultural practices, environmental quality, and socio-economic and socio-cultural aspects were collected using different tools including questionnaires and soil biodiversity indexes.• Marketing campaigns have helped to build public awareness around the biological and bio-cultural values of Cuban Biosphere Reserves at national and international levels. They have also served to improve markets for Man and Biosphere farmers and create opportunities and conditions for public and private investments in agro-tourism and ecotourism that support the protected areas in Cuba.• There is potential to better integrate and align efforts and activities to achieve outcomes for both agricultural and wild biodiversity, yet most agricultural and wild conservation strategies continue to be pursued separately. By bringing together different sectors, the project is tapping into the expertise of usually separated fields, to work towards strengthening the resilience and food security of these socio-ecological landscapes.• Mainstreaming conservation and sustainable use of agrobiodiversity, that builds on traditional knowledge and cultural values, into the protected area management system can provide resilient and innovative resources for society contributing to the sustainability of the protected areas and the livelihoods of the communities.• Farming that is carried out in and around protected areas is often embedded into agroforestry systems where different wild and cultivated species co-exist and relies on traditional practices that help sustain ecosystem health and biodiversity.The objective of this initiative was to increase agricultural biodiversity in the buffer and transition zones of the Sierra del Rosario and Cuchillas del Toa in the UNESCO Man and Biosphere (MAB) Reserve of Cuba. The Man and Biosphere Programme is an intergovernmental scientific program to enhance the relationship between people and their environment including through the creation of diversified and sustainable agricultural production systems that build on traditional knowledge and bio-cultural values, and foster community and stakeholder participation. The project focused on integrating wild and agricultural biodiversity conservation and sustainable use strategies in these areas; improving the management of the Cuban MAB Reserve system through enhanced leadership and decision-making capacity of all relevant stakeholders; and improving the livelihoods of those communities living in and around the project site through benefit-sharing mechanisms that support sustainable use of agricultural biodiversity.• Many of the farming management practices used are biodiversity-friendly, for example, fences made of vegetation, fruit trees to shade vegetable crops, intercropping systems as well as the use of natural compost. The project has promoted recognition of the value of such farming systems within the reserve as a means of food, knowledge, and cultural heritage, and agrobiodiversity conservation is now included in conservation strategies in the reserves.• Several farmer-based seedbanks have been created in the two reserves with the technical support of the project. Farmers voluntarily accepted to act as custodians of specific crops and varieties (landraces) by conserving seeds or planting material on their farms and exchanging them with other neighboring farmers in case of need or simply because they want to try different crops and varieties.• A set of indicators developed through the project to measure the socio-ecological resilience of the farms in the face of climate change and enhance resilience using participatory practices has garnered much interest among NGOs, research institutes, and development agencies around the world as a useful tool for participatory landscape resilience assessments. The indicators were developed as part of an earlier project within the framework of the Satoyama Initiative, but Cuba was the first country where they were tested.Some of the richest, most beautiful, and most diverse agricultural landscapes can be found in UNESCO Man and Biosphere (MAB) Reserves around the world. Yet, while biodiversity conservation has always been a fundamental tenet in the management of these reserves, the protection of agricultural landscapes has largely been neglected. The result is a continuing tension between conservationists and agricultural communities living in protected areas. An innovative and flexible approach to nature conservation is needed that bridges the objectives of ecosystem and agrobiodiversity conservation, improves the well-being of agricultural communities, and contributes to food sovereignty.• A new inventory of plants species and their uses found in the two reserves has been created and it amounts to 732. The different farm types found in the two reserves were also characterized and crop distribution is available for 171 farms in the two areas.• 33 farm-based community seedbanks have been established in the two reserves and 50 different crop species (perennial and annual) have been re-introduced and have benefited multiple families. The creation of new selling points along the road in the two reserves has represented an opportunity for farmers to sell all those products that are not contracted with the state and that usually are wasted on farm because not commercialized or processed • Biodiversity fairs were promoted as a tool for raising public awareness of the value of conserving local fruit landraces. In all the project communities throughout the four countries, fruit diversity fairs were organized at local to national levels. During a fair, farmers from different communities are brought together to exhibit a range of landraces; this continues the traditional system of exchange of seeds and knowledge and local products made from the fruits. This has been a great participatory social learning tool for various objectives by a range of organizations.• Farmers across South and Southeast Asia have a wealth of knowledge and skill developed over millennia for cultivating different species and varieties of fruit trees which needs to be conserved and used, along with the vast array of genetic diversity.• Integrating traditional knowledge into formal conservation efforts undertaken by national agencies can bring tangible benefits to farmers.• Community engagement revealed that for fruit tree conservation efforts to succeed and be sustainable it was important that participation not be limited to farmers, but also include private nurseries, local banks, financing agencies and schools.South and Southeast Asia are the centers of origin and diversity of many globally important tropical fruit tree species from citrus, to mango, papaya, and rambutan, and their wild relatives. India alone is home to over 1,000 varieties of mango. This project aimed to improve the conservation and use of this rich tropical fruit tree genetic diversity by strengthening the capacity of farmers, local communities, and institutions to implement community-based management of local fruit tree diversity in home gardens and orchards, and to enhance the in-situ conservation of their wild relatives in forests. It also worked to establish a platform that integrates farmers' traditional knowledge and skills with scientific knowledge and formal conservation efforts undertaken by national agencies.• The project integrates traditional knowledge and practices into local farming and social systems. Community genetic diversity assessments revealed that farmers maintain rich tropical fruit tree diversity including a significant number of cultivars that have little commercial value but are important for home and local consumption. Traditional knowledge related to the cultivation of diverse tropical fruit tree species and varieties was also documented.• Participatory methods and on-farm and in situ conservation approaches were introduced as a completely new field of work for all partners. Frontline researchers and community organizers were trained with appropriate traditional knowledge documentation, participatory approaches, CBM methodology, diversity assessments, baseline survey methods, markets for diversity, etc., to equip partners to work with communities in developing action plans that reflect local needs. Capacity building of national and local educational institutes was carried out to train staff, in participatory assessment, conservation, valuation, and enhanced use of tropical fruit tree resources.• Community-based organizations like farmer organizations, women's groups, or self-help groups were established or strengthened for the implementation of local action plans. Stakeholders were involved through established Multidisciplinary Site Teams who regularly met and were involved in the implementation of activities to share knowledge and skill and promote local innovation built upon traditional knowledge and practices.The genetic diversity of tropical fruit trees in Asia is increasingly threatened. Threats facing cultivated species are the specialization of production systems in a few varieties, land-use changes, and climate change. Habitat loss is the primary threat facing wild relatives. Ex situ conservation of genetic diversity is difficult because tropical fruits generally possess recalcitrant seeds that cannot be stored in conventional genebanks. In-situ or on-farm conservation is considered to be a viable low-cost option; however, many national partners do not understand it adequately and experience difficulties with implementation strategies at the community level. The value of the farmer's contribution to in situ conservation is not well appreciated as much of the conservation investment in terms of human resources and operational funds are limited to ex situ conservation. •The project has reached out to 14,345 households through a wide range of development activities and training workshops across the four countries and worked intensively with 1,900 households across the project communities.The project assisted cooperatives and farmer associations and established or strengthened self-help groups, mainly in India through a collaboration with a local NGO (Dhan Foundation) targeting in particular women and poorer households involved in growing or collecting fruits. In total 53 nurseries have been established.• Farmers have learned grafting techniques and over 77,000 saplings of 87 selected elite materials (best performing trees of a species or variety) were distributed across the project sites. These were documented in 27 fruit catalogues including photos of trees, fruits, and leaves and a description of their uses, characteristics and current availability, including the names and photos of their owners.• 61 diversity fairs were organized over a period of 5 years, from small but vibrant village fairs to the participation of farmer groups in trade events or fairs in major cities such as the famous 'mango mela' in New Delhi or the Malaysian Agriculture, Horticulture and Agrotourism Show (MAHA) in Kuala Lumpur.• Custodian farmers and their families have been identified, documented with their fruit tree diversity, and involved in key activities of the project such as developing fruit catalogues, identifying elite materials, participating in diversity fairs and training workshops. They also played a key role in identifying, implementating and mainstreaming of good practices and establishing fruit tree diversity gardens in 30 sites.The Peru has some of the world's richest biodiversity and is a center of origin for several priority crops that are of global importance on the one hand, and critical for local rural livelihoods on the other. Over 50% of rural inhabitants live in poverty including the indigenous populations who live in arid Andean highlands where much globally important agrobiodiversity is conserved. Like many other low-income countries, Peru faces the challenge of how to safeguard its valuable genetic diversity maintained by farmers in their fields while meeting those same people's development needs and rights, particularly for genetic diversity that has little market demand or cultural appeal. There is also often a gap between the good intentions of policies to 'share benefits' with traditional and indigenous farmers who conserve ancestral varieties and the actual practice of assuring 'benefits' by responding to farmers' demands with clear mechanisms for self-determination.These two projects set out good practice approaches that recognize and reward the important role of custodian farmers in conserving precious genetic diversity including where there are no market incentives for doing so.Payments for Agrobiodiversity Conservation Services in Peru (PACS)• Agricultural biodiversity is the basis of human survival and well-being -safeguarding it is crucial to providing future food growing options for us all. But its conservation is often carried out by smallholder farmers who receive little recognition or compensation for carrying out what is essentially a service for the public good.• Empowering the communities to identify their own rewards in PACS tenders, an important form of participatory justice, is an essential part of making the incentive scheme work.• Strong support from the Ministry of Environment in Peru, combined with the interest and knowledge of the farmers on quinoa diversity, as well as support through regional governments have all contributed to the success of the project.'Payments for Agrobiodiversity Conservation Services (PACS)' recognizes and rewards the role that custodian farmers play in conserving crop varieties of global importance on their farms in particular those that have no economic value. PACs schemes involve landscape-wide competitive tenders where communities are invited to submit proposals to conserve a priority portfolio of crop species and varieties that are at risk of being lost and to name their conditions for doing so -the 'payment' which is usually in the form of in-kind rewards such as community equipment. The scheme has been successfully trialed in Peru on quinoa varieties where the Ministry of the Environment has recognized its complementary role to ensure the conservation of its genetic base against market development activities. • Tools are needed that can gather data to show clear evidence of the impact of conservation initiatives by the private sector -businesses need data and information about the efficacy of their corporate social environmental initiatives and co-investors wants proof of the biodiversity return on their investments.• The need for review and monitoring mechanisms was a key lesson from the UNEP-WCMC report on Aichi Target Assessments. The integrated assessment of data provided by TerraBio helps determine if private sector environmental targets are being achieved, and how they affect land use and biodiversity conservation over time.TerraBio is a geospatial and biodiversity methodological framework developed by the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT to support environmental monitoring as part of the Amazon Biodiversity Fund (ABF). It links in situ biodiversity data with annual maps of habitat conditions to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of private-sector food production, forest-based extraction interventions, and restoration activities. These include the adoption of silvopastoral systems -an agroecological approach that uses a mix of trees, livestock, and pastures -on biodiversity conservation. The project is being carried out through Catalyzing and Learning through Private Sector Engagement (CAL-PSE), a program for biodiversity conservation in the Brazilian Amazon.The Amazon is Earth's single largest tropical forest and biodiversity hotspot providing 20% of the earth's oxygen and 16% of its freshwater. It also directly supports more than 30 million people contributing to an estimated 70% of South America's GDP. According to the Living Planet Index, the region is the worst performing in terms of biodiversity loss with an estimated 94% of species decline from 1970 to 2016. In Brazil, land cover change, as well as illegal extractive activities like mining, are putting the forest at risk along with the global and local ecosystem services it provides. Businesses operating in the Amazon have extensive influence on decisions around the use of natural resources, thus through greater accountability and transparency, they could have a pivotal role in transforming food systems and value chains to be more sustainable. Greater accountability is particularly important for those that impact land cover change such as agriculture and extractive industries.• Given that traditional forests and biodiversity monitoring approaches across geographies tend to be expensive, timeconsuming, and difficult to standardize, TerraBio is being developed and applied to integrate state-of-the-art land use mapping technologies with innovative biodiversity data collection methodologies. The remote-sensing system can detect forest loss, forest degradation, and the regeneration of vegetation through the implementation of sustainable practices.• The mapping component is complemented by the collection of on-site soil samples for DNA analysis to inventory the community of species present in different land cover and land use areas.The integrated assessment of this data helps determine if private sector environmental targets are being achieved, and how they improve (or not) land use and biodiversity conservation over time.• A pilot application of TerraBio was conducted in 2021 in an area of 40,000 km2 to evaluate the implementation of shaded cocoa plots in pasture-dominated landscapes. The pilot provided many lessons to improve TerraBio's methodology, and we also learned about the presence of over 50 different insect taxonomic groups in shaded cocoa plots that included important pollinator species such as butterflies and bees.• In 2022, TerraBio was used in two business deals within the impact investment fund. Analysis is underway to report back to the fund and investors on environmental indicator baselines and monitoring will continue over time as well as incoming ones to assess their actual impact and generate the evidence required to promote sustainable practices and economic development in the Brazilian Amazon.","tokenCount":"19652"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0037676580.json b/data/part_1/0037676580.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..23e1ce561b8b857bb71c80a06421d290d5cfaf93 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0037676580.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"b5cf99b1c77ce628cc7c95a2fae3d7b4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/d5b68c6e-b291-4151-99a7-04aaab439b02/retrieve","id":"-1308690154"},"keywords":["WEFE nexus","trade-offs among ES","policy uptake of NbS","Valle del Cauca","ES valuation","forests ES"],"sieverID":"f6cfb8f8-625d-49e1-9ff6-37b52b537dc1","pagecount":"17","content":"Forests play a crucial role in providing ecosystem services (ESs), critical for maintaining ecological balance and supporting human well-being through a wide range of functions. These include regulating services like carbon sequestration, habitat quality and biodiversity conservation, water regulation and soil preservation [1][2][3][4][5]. These ecosystems are integral to sustainable land use planning and decision-making due to their multifunctional role in providing critical ES and socio-economic benefits [6]. However, rapid land use changes driven by agricultural expansion, urbanization, and industrial activities-among other drivers-have significantly altered forests, leading to the degradation of these vital ecosystems and the services they provide [7]. Therefore, integrating measures to cope with these drivers along with forest management into land use planning is critical for achieving sustainable development goals and ensuring the balanced allocation of resources [8]. Forest loss and degradation are not evenly distributed across global regions. While Europe and Asia have gained forest cover during the last 10 years (0.3 and 1.2 million hectares (Mha)/year respectively), deforestation has happened mainly in the tropical regions in the global south, with net losses in Africa and South America of 3.9 and 2.6 Mha/year, respectively, between 2010 and 2020 [9]. One of the reasons forest loss continues in these regions is the different trade-offs that occur when promoting forest cover [10]. While some ESs of public nature, mainly regulating ones, might be enhanced (e.g., water quality, carbon sequestration, habitat for wild species), forest expansion can come with an opportunity cost by limiting other potentially profitable land uses and the enhancement of certain provisioning services, mostly of a private nature, such as agricultural food production [11]. This trade-off situation is particularly visible in Latin America, where forest loss trends continue [12]. Between 2000 and 2018, 68 Mha of net forest loss were registered in South America, primarily affecting tropical rainforests, which accounted for 40% of global forest loss during this period [13]. While having some of the most biodiverse forest ecosystems globally, the region also presents vast pressures on these resources driven by economic development targets and food and energy security agendas. Given its socio-economic context, the region must promote sustainable development and economic growth [14].The continuous forest loss and degradation dynamics have increased the recognition of the need to implement sustainable land management practices to preserve and enhance forests and their ES. To promote such needed sustainable land management practices, nature-based solutions (NbSs) have emerged as a promising approach, as they are \"actions to protect, conserve, restore, sustainably use and manage natural or modified terrestrial, freshwater, coastal and marine ecosystems, which address social, economic and environmental challenges effectively and adaptively, while simultaneously providing human well-being, ecosystem services and resilience and biodiversity benefits\" [15]. Thus, NbSs should leverage natural processes to address environmental challenges while providing human well-being and biodiversity benefits [16]. Forest-related NbSs include reforestation, afforestation, sustainable forest management, and agroforestry systems [17].NbSs can be framed within the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystems (WEFE) nexus concept that, in recent years, has gained traction as a holistic framework for understanding the interconnections-either in terms of synergies or trade-offs-between these critical sectors [18]. The WEFE nexus highlights how water security is intrinsically linked to energy and food security and how ecosystem degradation can have far-reaching implications across these domains [19,20]. This concept is especially crucial for regions facing complex trade-offs between security agendas [21].Despite the growing recognition of NbSs and the WEFE nexus and agreement about their potential interlinkages (e.g., [22,23]), there remains a significant research gap in understanding the positive and negative impacts that land use changes pushing for forest-related NbSs create. While advocacy increases for NbS, such as reforestation and afforestation, due to their capacity to sequester carbon and improve water-related ES, more research is needed into the unintended trade-offs that might arise, e.g., between provisioning and regulating services supply. Such research is necessary so that NbS strategies not only achieve climate and environmental objectives, but also support socioeconomic needs [24]. This research gap has become more pronounced in the Latin American region and other developing countries, where research lags behind and remains fragmented [25]. Specifically, there is a need to assess the costs and benefits these changes generate from multiple perspectives. Furthermore, it is essential to advance the practical application of ES valuation methodologies that inform decision-making linked to policy contexts, such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and climate change policies, to help direct funding for biodiversity conservation [26].This study contributes to address these knowledge gaps by conducting a biophysical and economic valuation of ESs and comparing business as usual (BAU) and forest-NbS scenarios to identify and assess possible future land use development trajectories. The study was conducted within the context of the EU Horizon2020 REXUS project (Managing REsilient neXUs Systems through participatory systems dynamics modeling; project cofounded by the European Union under the grant No. 101003632), which aimed to provide evidence on the role of NbS in facing WEFE nexus-related challenges in Europe and South America. More specifically, this research focuses on the Nima sub-basin in Colombia, a multipurpose Andean water sub-basin vital for water supply to the water, energy, and agricultural sectors in the municipality of Palmira, supporting 350,000 residents, 13 rural aqueducts and the municipal aqueduct, and two hydropower plants [27][28][29]. The sub-basin faces challenges such as deforestation, water pollution, and increased risks from climate change, necessitating the implementation of NbS. This area was set as a case study since strategic ecosystems for biodiversity conservation and hydrological cycle regulation are inside it, such as mist forests and paramo. In terms of biodiversity, the sub-basin accounts for around 566 species of faunal biodiversity, including birds, herpetofauna, and mammals [30]. Regarding water sources, the Nima River drainage network consists of 272 tributaries, covering approximately 96.65 km, providing drinking water to 13 rural communities and approximately 355,000 inhabitants of the Palmira municipality. Additionally, the area has around 127 springs and three glacial lakes [31].By comparing the BAU scenario with an alternative forest-NbS future scenario, we expect to derive potential gains and losses associated with different land use and management choices. Our research results support and inform future decision-making regarding the implementation of forest-related NbS while contributing to advancing knowledge of using ES valuation as a tool within the WEFE nexus approach to support its practical implementation. This study aligns with the growing body of research on forests as NbSs, and their role in providing multiple ESs and benefits while also considering potential trade-offs in their implementation.The Nima River sub-basin, located in the Valle del Cauca Department in the western part of Colombia, covers 16.702 hectares and includes two main landscape units: a mountainous area upstream and a flat area downstream, with elevations ranging from 1050 to 4100 m above sea level (Figure 1). The climatic characteristics of the sub-basin are determined by an annual rainfall regime ranging from 1600 to 1800 mm [32]. Its hydrology is characterized by 14 tributaries, which provide an average flow of 2 m 3 /s, captured at the intake of the Palmira municipal aqueduct [33].In terms of land use coverage in the sub-basin, the pristine paramo ecosystem and the Andean ecosystems (high mountain ecosystems) occupy 27% of the area and are home to various endemic and endangered species of fauna and flora. The main productive activity upstream is livestock farming, mainly cattle ranching, which accounts for 19% of the land use [34]. Forest plantations (Pinus sp. and Eucalyptus sp.) cover 2% of the area [35], and a mosaic of crops occupies another 3%, consisting mostly of coffee and annual crops (e.g., tomato, cilantro, green beans, onion, corn) [34]. The downstream area is surrounded by an agricultural landscape primarily composed of sugarcane plantations, covering 21% of the area [36].In the mountainous upstream area of the sub-basin, there are designated conservation zones of regional and national importance, such as the Regional Natural Park of the Nima River, the National Natural Protective Forest Reserve of Amaime, and Las Hermosas National Natural Park, where the Nima River originates [37]. In the lower area of the sub-basin, the Nima River flows into the Amaime River, one of the main tributaries of the Cauca River, the second most important river in Colombia. The sub-basin supports various economic activities across its area. In the upper part, these include commercial forestry, farming (e.g., poultry and pig farming), subsistence agriculture, and the cultivation of cash crops. Commercial crops, primarily sugar cane, dominate the lower part. These activities place pressures on essential ES, leading to significant issues, particularly related to water pollution and availability. As a result, water quality and quantity are among the primary ESs affected within the sub-basin [38].The NbSs chosen to simulate and compare with the current BAU scenario on the Nima River sub-basin were selected through a participatory process involving 30 stakeholders from different WEFE sectors within the sub-basin, such as civil society and institutional bodies, as well as private sector organizations (Table 1). The selection of diversified types of stakeholders allowed us to consult actors with decision-making power, actors that would implement the discussed solutions, and actors that can facilitate or support the implementation process. These stakeholders included farmers; regional and local governments, such as the Municipality of Palmira through the departments of Environmental Management and Agriculture, and the Government of Valle del Cauca; the Chamber of Commerce of Palmira; the regional environmental authority; the National University of Colombia; and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) operating within the sugarcane sector and water-related associations, such as Fundación Fondo Agua por la Vida y la Sostenibilidad (i.e., the Water Fund Foundation) and the Association of Users of the Amaime and Nima Rivers (ASOAMAIME).The participatory process, implemented within the framework of the REXUS project, employed a standardized methodology proposed by the REXUS consortium, consisting of two phases [39]. The first phase aimed at having the stakeholders select the NbS they considered capable of addressing the challenges of the sub-basin, from an initial list of solutions prioritized in the project's framework. In the second phase, a prioritization exercise of the selected NbS was conducted. During the first phase, stakeholders were given a list of 16 NbS, each accompanied by a description of its importance and the means for its implementation. The 16 NbS were selected within the framework of the REXUS project considering the two main challenges in the area. They analyzed these NbSs to determine which ones best addressed the challenges of the sub-basin. The challenges identified as of highest priority by stakeholders within the sub-basin are related to water quality and quantity regulation and maintenance. Additionally, stakeholders were encouraged to propose other NbSs they believed could address the challenges of the sub-basin that were not included in the provided list. This participatory approach yielded several stakeholder-identified solutions, which were subsequently included in the final list of NbS (see Table 6 in Section 3).In the second phase of the participatory process, stakeholders were asked to qualitatively prioritize the selected NbSs, according to their knowledge and using the following three criteria:• Effectiveness, i.e., the solution's effectiveness in achieving the goals and objectives defined to face WEFE nexus-related challenges; • Acceptability, i.e., the level of social acceptance the solution has;• Feasibility, i.e., how easily the solution can be implemented based on the stakeholders' capabilities.At the end of the prioritization exercise, stakeholders agreed to select forest landscape restoration, via afforestation and reforestation practices, as the single most relevant NbS at the local scale to face the challenges of the sub-basin. The subsequent NbS assessment, therefore, has been applied considering such NbSs as an alternative to the BAU scenario.Building on the outcomes of the stakeholder consultation process, a forest landscape restoration strategy via a hypothetical expansion of forest areas in the middle and upper parts of the sub-basin was identified as the best alternative land use scenario to the BAU.To conduct the analysis, two scenarios were defined (Figure 2):1.Baseline (BAU) Scenario-This scenario includes the current land use practices without any additional conservation measures or any change of practices. With the term \"current\", we indicate the time in which the study has been conducted, and it reflects the traditional management practices in the sub-basin. In this scenario, fragmented forests and grasslands are prevalent on the upper part of the sub-basin; 2.NbS Scenario-This scenario includes the establishment and development of dense forests of native species between the middle and upper parts of the sub-basin, incorporating the prioritized forest landscape restoration strategies. Example species include Andean trees and shrubs from low montane humid forest such as the native pepper plants (e.g., Piper cornifolium, P. lacunosum), Andean walnut (Juglans neotropica), Cecropia trees (Cecropia sp.), Alnus acuminata, Morella pubescens, and others [40]. These two scenarios were mapped using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), considering areas with high potential for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) implementation, considering the previous identification of potential areas to reforest through this scheme by the Palmira municipality. We assessed water flow regulation, water quality and water provisioning ES for each scenario using the InVEST 3.13.0 flood risk mitigation, nutrient-delivery ration and annual water yield models, respectively [41]. Additionally, we also considered the value of food (i.e., farmed food-crop) provisioning for both scenarios. The selected ESs were chosen based on the primary challenges and main economic activities within the area. The NbS scenario has been considered as the forest was at the maturity stage, providing the full range of potential ES. To account for the time that the NbS takes to deliver the ES, we created a cashflow and estimated a net present value (NPV) for the NbS scenario, considering the annual costs of implementing the NbS (i.e., payments to landowners during ten years within the PES framework) and its expected benefits from year 11, considering a 25-year horizon. We used a discount rate of 4% following [42]. The value of the annual costs of implementing the NbS was retrieved during conversations with the Municipality of Palmira within the framework of the REXUS project. The resulting NPV was transformed into a single annuity for a terminating annual series. This step makes NbS values comparable with the BAU ones. Following the \"with and without\" principle [43,44], net ES supply was calculated as the difference between the NbS and BAU scenarios. These two scenarios were mapped using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), considering areas with high potential for Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) implementation, considering the previous identification of potential areas to reforest through this scheme by the Palmira municipality. We assessed water flow regulation, water quality and water provisioning ES for each scenario using the InVEST 3.13.0 flood risk mitigation, nutrient-delivery ration and annual water yield models, respectively [41]. Additionally, we also considered the value of food (i.e., farmed food-crop) provisioning for both scenarios. The selected ESs were chosen based on the primary challenges and main economic activities within the area. The NbS scenario has been considered as the forest was at the maturity stage, providing the full range of potential ES. To account for the time that the NbS takes to deliver the ES, we created a cashflow and estimated a net present value (NPV) for the NbS scenario, considering the annual costs of implementing the NbS (i.e., payments to landowners during ten years within the PES framework) and its expected benefits from year 11, considering a 25-year horizon. We used a discount rate of 4% following [42]. The value of the annual costs of implementing the NbS was retrieved during conversations with the Municipality of Palmira within the framework of the REXUS project. The resulting NPV was transformed into a single annuity for a terminating annual series. This step makes NbS values comparable with the BAU ones. Following the \"with and without\" principle [43,44], net ES supply was calculated as the difference between the NbS and BAU scenarios.For both BAU and NbS scenarios, four key ESs were assessed from both biophysical (Section 3.2.1) and economic (Section 3.2.2) perspectives. This evaluation allows for an understanding of the impact of land use changes on the ecosystem from the different WEFE dimensions.The assessment of ESs and the methodologies used for each of them are detailed below.Water flow regulation.Biophysical Assessment-The flood risk mitigation capacity was assessed using the InVEST 3.14.1 flood risk mitigation model, which allows one to measure the capacity of ecosystems to retain precipitation water and release it in a controlled manner, regulating drought and flood events. This model has been previously applied in economic valuation studies of NbS, where it effectively demonstrated their economic benefits to flood risk management [44,45]; Economic Valuation-The economic value of water flow regulation was estimated using the replacement cost method, which calculates the cost of alternative flood mitigation infrastructure, such as levees and retention basins, that would be required to achieve similar outcomes. The annual value of the ES was calculated as the single annuity of a finite series of annuities, based on a useful life of 60 years for the surrogate good and a discount rate of 4% [42].Input and output data for assessing and evaluating water flow regulation are reported in Table 2. Depth of rainfall (mm) 71.4 mm as the average maximum precipitation in 24 h (1989-2019), identified from [47] Soils' hydrological group raster 250 m spatial resolution raster of categorical hydrological groups from [48] Economic value Replacement cost method. Surrogate good: lamination basin. Unit cost: EUR 400/m 3 calculated from [49] and updated to 2023Retained runoff volume (m 3 ) Raster with runoff retention values (in m3) indicating the capability of each pixel to store runoff 2.Water provisioning.Biophysical Assessment-The quantity of water provided under the BAU and NbS scenarios was assessed using the InVEST 3.14.1 annual water yield model. This tool evaluates how land cover changes impact water availability throughout the year.Economic Valuation-The market price method was used to assess the economic value of water provisioning, calculating the potential revenue generated from water use for various purposed such as hydropower, agricultural, and domestic.Input and output data for assessing and evaluating water provisioning are reported in Table 3.Water purification.Biophysical Assessment-The InVEST 3.14.1 nutrient delivery ratio model was used to assess the sub-basin's capacity to filter and purify water by trapping nitrogen exports, based on the present land cover for each scenario.Economic Valuation-The economic benefits of water purification were estimated using avoided-cost methods, focusing on the expenses avoided in water treatment facilities due to the natural purification services provided by ecosystems. Input and output data for assessing and evaluating water purification are reported in Table 4. Table 3. Input and output data for the assessment and evaluation of water provisioning.Land cover map (BAU and NbS scenarios) BAU: Raster of land use/land cover (LULC) for each pixel (resolution 5 m × 5 m), based on [36] NbS: BAU map adapted with prioritized areas for a PES scheme from the municipality of Palmira Precipitation map Raster of average annual precipitation in the sub-basing, retrieved from [50] Evapotranspiration map Raster of average annual evapotranspiration in the sub-basin, retrieved from [51] Root restricting layer depth map Raster of root restricting layer depth, the soil depth at which root penetration is strongly inhibited because of physical or chemical characteristics, retrieved from [52] Plant available water content Raster of plant available water content, the fraction of water that can be stored in the soil profile that is available to plants. Value defined as 1, as per the suggestion of the InVEST model Biophysical table csv file reporting biophysical parameters for each LULC class; parameters were derived from [51,52] Economic value (EUR)Market price from water use for hydropower, agricultural, and domestic purposes; data from [53] in COP and converted to EURWater yield volume (m 3 ) Raster values with the total volume of water yield in the sub-basin (in m 3 ) Table 4. Input and output data for the assessment and evaluation of water purification.Land cover map (BAU and NbS scenarios) BAU: Raster of land use/land cover (LULC) for each pixel (resolution 5 m × 5 m), based on [36] NbS: BAU map adapted with prioritized areas for a PES scheme from the municipality of Palmira Digital Elevation Model Raster of elevation above sea level for the study area; data from [54] Nutrient Runoff Proxy Raster of average annual precipitation in the sub-basin, retrieved from [50] Biophysical table csv file reporting each LULC class in relation to its biophysical properties to N load and retention; values were derived from [55,56] Economic value Replacement cost method. Surrogate good: lamination basin. Unit cost: EUR 87.6/kg of N; data retrieved from [57] in COP and converted to EUR and updated to 2023.Total N export (kg/m 2 /year) A raster showing how much nitrogen from each pixel eventually reaches the stream for each scenario Biophysical Assessment-An Excel-based calculation was conducted to estimate changes in food production under different scenarios, considering the area of arable land and crop yield data.Economic Valuation-The economic value of food provisioning was evaluated using market prices, considering the potential revenue from different agricultural products sales.Input and output data for assessing and evaluating food provisioning are reported in Table 5.Table 5. Input and output data for the assessment and evaluation of food provisioning.Products List of agricultural products harvested in the Nima River sub-basin; data retrieved from [34] Price per kg and ton (EUR/kg and EUR/ton)The price of the product per kilogram and ton in COP retrieved from [58] and converted into EUR Farmed area in Nima (ha)The area where each product is cultivated within the Nima River sub-basin; data calculated via Q-GIS based on the land cover mapsTotal crop production in the Nima basin (ton)The total production quantity of each product, based on the harvested area and yieldThe total market value of the production from the Nima River sub-basin in EUR, calculated by multiplying the production quantity by the price per tonThis section presents the outcomes of the participatory process that selected and prioritized the most relevant NbS to conduct the ES valuation in the Nima sub-basin (Section 3.1) and the findings from such biophysical and economic valuations for both the BAU and NbS scenarios (Section 3.2).The participatory process with WEFE-relevant stakeholders focused on proposing and prioritizing NbS. As a result of this process, 11 NbSs were considered relevant to face the challenges of the sub-basin (i.e., water quality and quantity). Moreover, stakeholders proposed to add four extra measures they considered relevant. Subsequently, among the total 15 NbSs selected, stakeholders prioritized 5 of them using the criteria mentioned in the methodology section (Section 2.2). Forest landscape restoration was the final solution prioritized as the most relevant by the stakeholders (Table 6 synthesizes the process of NbS selection and prioritization, from the initial list proposed to the final NbS selected).The assessment of targeted ESs associated to both the BAU and NbS scenarios was conducted through a two-step process. First, ESs were assessed in biophysical terms (Section 3.2.1) and an economic analysis was performed to quantify the economic impacts of the two scenarios (Section 3.2.2).The biophysical assessment estimated that 233,143 m 3 of water is retained annually when comparing the BAU scenario with the NbS scenario (Table 7). This result indicates a 2.9% increase in water retention for the NbS scenario (i.e., implementing the forest landscape restoration strategy via the PES scheme). Conversely, the evaluation of water provision showed a minimal increase of 0.01% in the volume of surface water available per year, from 157.12 million m 3 /year in the BAU scenario to 157.14 million m 3 /year in the NbS scenario. Water quality assessment indicates a 4.7% reduction in nitrogen pollutants (kg/year) when transitioning from the BAU scenario to the NbS scenario. This result highlights the potential positive impact of forest landscape restoration in lowering water pollution levels. On the other hand, the food production service showed a reduction in the NbS scenario concerning the BAU one since part of the forest landscape restoration strategy was simulated in current agricultural lands. The biophysical assessment estimated total crop production to be 474,250.11 ton/year under the BAU scenario and 470,506.34 ton/year under the NbS scenario. These results imply a 3743.77 ton/year reduction, equivalent to a decrease of nearly 0.8% in service provision.The economic valuation exercise estimates significant differences between the BAU and NbS scenarios. The values reported consist of single annuities of terminating annual series for both scenarios calculated based on a 25-year horizon (Table 8). Water flow regulation emerges as the ES with the most substantial increase under the NbS scenario, showing an increase of EUR 11.39 million/year compared to the BAU scenario, with a total value of EUR 155.64 million/year. The water provisioning service displays a comparative minimal difference between the two scenarios, yielding an increase of EUR 19,729.43/year in the NbS scenario over the BAU, with total values of EUR 370,701.26/year and EUR 350,971.83/year, respectively. This marginal difference aligns with the minor variation observed from the biophysical assessment. Regarding the water purification service, the estimated avoided costs for water purification show a moderate decrease under the NbS scenario, which reflects the positive effect of the NbS for this service. The economic benefit is estimated at EUR 265,779.96/year in terms of avoided costs with respect to the BAU scenario. On the other hand, the food provisioning service shows a decrease in the NbS scenario. The economic valuation indicates a reduction of EUR 3,212,923.70/year compared to the BAU scenario, contrary to the other services. This economic decrease corresponds with the reduction observed in the biophysical assessment of this service.These assessments estimate that the NbS scenario results in a net positive economic impact of EUR 8,463,673.93/year across all evaluated ESs.The biophysical and economic valuation results of this study provide valuable insights into the potential impacts of implementing NbSs in the Nima sub-basin in Colombia with a WEFE nexus approach. Our estimations show that the forest-based NbS scenario results in a net positive economic impact of EUR 8.46 million/year across all evaluated ESs. This finding aligns with other studies that have shown the economic benefits of NbSs, such as [59], who report significant economic advantages of forest-NbSs through the supply of multiple ESs, among which are water flow regulation and water quality. Other studies like [60] report a significant increase in carbon sequestration through forest conservation and restoration. We observed reduced food provision at the expense of increased water flow regulation and purification. Interestingly, our results show a slight increase (0.01%) in annual water quantity, differing from some studies that suggest forest restoration might reduce overall water availability in a basin [61] and, in more general terms, suggest a strong relationship between forest cover and change in runoff patterns, e.g., [62]. On the other hand, our findings are consistent with those of [63], who found that reforestation measures can reduce peak flows and stormflows associated with soil degradation; however, they did not report evidence that this also produced a corresponding increase in low flows. Although the dominant paradigm indicates trade-offs between forest cover and water yield, particularly in terms of groundwater recharge, [64] identified several caveats and biases. While these inconsistent findings may advocate for more specific studies, they may also suggest that some issues arose in feeding or calibrating relevant InVEST models.Our study contributes to addressing knowledge gaps about forest-NbS scenarios in multipurpose water basins, which are critical for water supply to various sectors. This approach serves as an instrument for considering different elements of the WEFE nexus, highlighting potential synergies and trade-offs across sectors. For instance, the reduction in food provision indicated by our valuation might raise concerns among some stakeholders (e.g., farmers) in the municipality of Palmira, mainly if restoration is applied to the entire middle and upper zones of the sub-basin where agriculture is relevant for local livelihoods [65].The participatory process employed in this study plays a crucial role in legitimizing the results and enhancing their potential for integration into decision-making processes. This approach coincides with the growing recognition of the importance of stakeholder engagement in ES assessment and valuation, aligning theoretical models with the interests of local governments and other stakeholders [66,67]. In this way, our findings can significantly contribute to decision-making related to agricultural conversion projects in strategic zones of the Nima River sub-basin, potentially enabling these projects to be integrated into the implemented PES program.The potential effectiveness of this exercise in promoting PES schemes for forest landscape restoration is significant. By quantifying the economic value of ES under different scenarios, our study provides a strong foundation for justifying investments in NbSs. This approach is similar to that used by [68] in their analysis of PES schemes in Costa Rica, where economic valuation played a crucial role in program design and implementation. Our findings, showing increases in water flow regulation and water purification services, align with other successful PES cases in Latin America, such as the Water Funds in Ecuador and Colombia [69]. Globally, our results contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of economic valuation in PES scheme development, as seen in cases from Vietnam [70] and Tanzania [71].Despite the valuable insights provided by this study, several limitations should be acknowledged. Data availability was a significant constraint, necessitating reliance on global sources that might not be accurately calibrated to the study area. This limitation is common in ecosystem service valuation studies, as noted by [2]. Additionally, our analysis focused on a subset of forest ES, potentially underestimating the total value of NbS implementation. For instance, carbon sequestration could significantly increase the estimated benefits, as [72] demonstrated in their global forest carbon assessment. Forests also provide other significant regulating services, such as moisture recycling and temperature regulation, which might influence other land cover responses (e.g., agriculture). The study by [73] reported that nearly 50% of precipitation in certain regions is regulated by vegetation, and studies by [74,75] demonstrated how forests effectively contribute to global and local cooling by driving evapotranspiration, creating cloud cover, and influencing surface albedo. These ESs provided by forests play a critical role in sustaining agricultural productivity downwind from forested areas. Similarly, ESs that might reveal additional economic advantages from forest conservation and restoration are pollination and biological control services, as [76] showed in their study on coffee production in Costa Rica.Despite these limitations, this study can provide substantial policy implications for land use planning and ES management. Our findings support the mobilization of Target 19 of the Global Biodiversity Framework, which aims to increase financial resources for biodiversity conservation. This study provides a strong argument for integrating ecosystem service valuation into land planning processes by demonstrating the economic value of NbSs. This narrative aligns with the recommendations of [77], who argue for mainstream-ing natural capital approaches in decision-making. Furthermore, our results can inform the development of more comprehensive PES schemes and support the implementation of NbSs at larger scales, contributing to both local sustainable development and global conservation goals.We conducted a biophysical and economic valuation of ES to compare BAU and forest-NbS scenarios to estimate potential benefits and trade-offs of land use development trajectories with a WEFE nexus approach in a multipurpose Andean water sub-basin in Western Colombia. Our estimations show that the forest-based NbS scenario results in significant net positive economic impacts across all evaluated ESs, yet highlights relevant trade-offs between ESs (e.g., food provisioning). From a public policy perspective, such a scenario looks fully consistent with the rationale behind policy tools and-in particularmarket-based instruments to support ES delivery. Indeed, the NbS scenario would support the provision of a set of public goods, benefiting local communities as a whole, at the (partial) expense of private goods (food). The estimated gap in terms of benefits gained under the NbS scenario provides robust justification for the NbS development from a public investment angle, as it demonstrates it would be possible to support farmers in partly shifting land use and management practices towards solutions benefiting society at large, including beyond the targeted area. In fact, the benefits gained under the NbS scenario, in terms of water flow regulation, water quality, and water quantity, could contribute to reducing the main water-related challenges affecting farmers in the upper part of the sub-basin.The study builds on a participatory process involving stakeholders from different WEFE sectors within the sub-basin, who prioritized and selected the NbS scenario to compare against the BAU one, enhancing community participation and the potential integration of this exercise into potential decision-making processes. ESs for both scenarios were assessed from both biophysical and economic perspectives, considering ES representing different WEFE dimensions.Our study supports the growing body of literature on the economic benefits of forest-NbSs, and can provide policy implications for land use planning and ecosystem services management. Specifically, our findings could support the mobilization of important global environmental goals, such as Target 19 of the Global Biodiversity Framework. Our results can inform the development of PES schemes and support the implementation of NbSs at larger scales, contributing to both local sustainable development and global conservation goals. The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.We would like to thank all the stakeholders from the workshops held for the REXUS Nima pilot site for their valuable contributions to this research. We extend our special gratitude to the Dirección de Gestión de Medio Ambiente de Palmira for providing essential information about the Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Palmira. Their support has been instrumental in completing this study. A special thanks to Luisa Fernanda Eusse-Villa for supporting the creation of Figures 1 and 2.","tokenCount":"5538"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0038913595.json b/data/part_1/0038913595.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bdf4bf77714b691c8a45d7ddbac945cc55a5196e --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0038913595.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"59b3cd99c54c9accd0c47910845e7c3d","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/01063b41-1e03-4a81-b625-6330e6d40d43/retrieve","id":"-1677597210"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"d07ede55-1f3c-48b7-adbd-6360036f12ae","pagecount":"45","content":"The organizers and editors would like to sincerely thank all the contributors to various chapters of the compendium and their institutions specially, DoA, MoA, Govt. of Odisha; OUAT, Bhubaneshwar,Odisha views climate change as a direct threat to its socio-economic development with the potential of reversing the hard earned developmental gains achieved since long back. Ensuring that agriculture becomes climate smart is a priority for addressing the need for adequate, nutritionally balanced food for a growing and more demanding population in a situation of resource limitations, and climate change and variability. According to observations and scientific studies, climate change has resulted in an increase high inter and intra-seasonal rainfall variability and in extreme cyclones for Odisha. The impacts of climate change on agriculture production have rendered a significant proportion of households' food and nutrition insecure and consequently having to rely on food aid while climate projections show that conditions will worsen. Support to climate change adaptation and mitigation among smallholders hardly works when it is imposed from outside: local institutional frameworks for the adoption of climate-smart agricultural (CSA) practices at the Institutional arrangements and policy engagement at the district and community levels must play a facilitating role. This means that institutional frameworks that support farmer-driven adoption and adaptation must be encouraged. Supporting such frameworks usually not only involves developing new institutions but also creating synergies between existing institutions to implement policies effectively. The dissemination and uptake of climate smart technologies, tools and practices is still largely an ongoing, challenging process. Barriers at different levels must be overcome in all countries and solutions to these challenges must respond to specific local needs.The Compendium on CSA proposes such a holistic and integrated approach, building on sustainably increasing agricultural productivity and incomes, adapting and building resilience to climate change and reducing and/or removing GHG emissions, where possible. The compendium provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges and issues for sustainable development, both related and unrelated to climate change. I hope that the Compendium on CSA will stimulate dialogue and significant progress towards the identification and implementation of sustainable solutions for the farming sector, which safeguard its fundamental role for food security while responding effectively to the challenges of climate change. Coordination and alignment between agriculture, climate change, water, energy and other sectors will be crucial for the design of sound and inclusive policies, as well as regulatory frameworks to support the adoption of CSA practices by farmers, and ensure the sustainable and equitable use of resources in the long term.(Pramod Aggarwal)Stakeholders engaged in agricultural research for development (AR4D) are increasingly tackling risks associated with climate change in smallholder systems. Accordingly, development and scaling of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) are one of the priorities for all the organizations, departments and ministries associated with the farm sector. Having a 'one-stop-shop' compiled in the format of a compendium for CSA technologies, practices and services would therefore serve a guide for all the stakeholders for scaling CSA in smallholder systems. Bringing out a Compendium on Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) for Odisha, India was therefore thought of during the workshop on The main objectives to bring forth this compendium are: to argue the case for agriculture policies and practices that are climate-smart; to raise awareness of what can be done to make agriculture policies and practices climatesmart; and to provide practical guidance and recommendations that are well referenced and, wherever possible, based on lessons learned from practical action.CSA programmes are unlikely to be effective unless their implementation is supported by sound policies and institutions. It is therefore important to enhance institutional capacities in order to implement and replicate CSA strategies. Institutions are vital to agricultural development as well as the realisation of resilient livelihoods. They are not only a tool for farmers and decision-makers, but are also the main conduit through which CSA practices can be scaled up and sustained. The focus in this compendium is on CSA and it's relevant aspects, i.e., (i) technologies and practices, (ii) services, (iii) technology targeting, (iv) business models, (v) capacity building, and (vi) policies.The approaches and tools available in the compendium span from face-to-face technicianfarmer dialogues to more structured exchanges of online and offline e-learning. In every scenario it is clear that tailoring to local expectations and needs is key. In particular, the voice of farmers is essential to be captured as they are the key actors to promote sustainable agriculture, and their issues need to be prioritized.CSA practices are expected to sustainably increase productivity and resilience (adaptation), reduce Greenhouse Gases (mitigation), and enhance achievement of national food security along with sustainable development goals. CSA is widely expected to contribute towards achieving these objectives and enhance climate change adaptation.CSA practices have to be included in State's Climate Policy as a priority intervention as the state steps up efforts to tackle climate change. Furthermore, emphasis shoud be laid on CSA training for a sustainable mode to enhance CSA adoption in the state hence the relevance of developing this document.The adaption of climate related knowledge, technologies and practices to local conditions, promoting joint learning by farmers, researchers, rural advisor and widely disseminating CSA practices, is critical. This compendium brings together a collection of experiences from different stakeholders with background of agricultural extension and rural advisory services in supporting CSA. The contributions are not intended to be state-of-the art academic articles but thought and discussion pieces of work in progress. The compendium itself is aOdisha state has a big challenge of providing sustainable livelihoods for its population in the fragile ecosystems facing the issues of absolute water scarcity, erratic rainfall, drought, cyclone, flood and land degradation. About 80 per cent of its total population lives in rural areas and depends primarily on agriculture for livelihood. The performance of agriculture determines the food and nutritional security of the population and is important for reducing poverty and achieving inclusive growth. In fact, agriculture in Odisha is characterized by wide diversity and considerable spatio-temporal variations in growth and productivity. In the present agricultural scenario of Odisha, the average size of land holding is 1.25 ha for all categories of farmers but is only 0.6 ha for marginal and small farmers and is largely fragmented. The small and marginal farmers constituting more than 80% of the farming community, either own or rent a piece of land for cultivation. Odisha has cultivated area of 6.4 million ha out of 15.5 million ha geographical area. Agricultural activities depend on and are affected by natural environment in various ways via soil quality (texture, erodibility, nutrient depletion, moisture balance, salinity, etc.), water quality (surface and ground water pollution and depletion), air quality (greenhouse gas emission), bio-diversity, wildlife habitat and ecosystem as a whole. Paddy is the main crop of Odisha and is usually grown twice or even three times in a year. The coverage under Paddy during kharif is about 4.1 million ha and during rabi 0.3 million ha in a wide range of soils varying widely from highly acidic to slightly alkaline and from light sandy to stiff clays. Further, about 0.4 million ha is exposed to saline inundation, 0.35 million ha to water-logging, particularly in the deltaic areas. Odisha's climate is tropical, characterized by high temperature, high humidity, medium to high rainfall and short and mild winters. The normal rainfall of the state is 1451.2 mm.Odisha is prone to tropical cyclones, storm surges and tsunamis. Its densely populated coastal plains are the alluvial deposits of its river systems. The rivers in these areas, with heavy load of silt, have very little carrying capacity, resulting in frequent floods. Climate change is likely to impact negatively on many aspects of agriculture including irrigation availability, soil heath, pest population, crop and livestock production. Erratic rainfall and uneven distribution of rainfall cause drought in some places wihile floods in others. Recently the state is experiencing contrasting extreme weather conditions claiming many lives: from heat waves to cyclone, from droughts to floods. During the past decade, the state has faced one or more forms of disasters like floods, cyclone, tornado or drought every year. In last 100 years, Odisha experienced flood in 49 years, drought in 30 years and cyclone in 11 years. The poor and marginal farmers are most affected by these natural calamities. A striking issue is that the small, marginal and women farmers are unreached by the green revolution and so are targeted with the conservation strategy referred to as 'on-farm management in agricultural production systems' taking into account the climate change issues.Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) involves sustainable increase in agricultural productivity and incomes, adapting and building resilience to climate change, and, where ever possible, reducing and/or removing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (FAO, 2013). There are many ways to achieve these goals, depending on the environmental and social context in which an agricultural system operates. Hence CSA practices may include all aspects of crop, soil, and water management-from tactical considerations involving time of sowing and crop maturity, to nutrient, water, and pest management and conservation tillage options, as well as strategic decisions about crop selection, rotations, and cropping patterns and investment in irrigation infrastructure. While field studies can evaluate and identify a set of \"climate-smart\" practices that function well at a given location, crops and cropping systems simulation using simulation models provide a means to perform such ex-ante evaluations.Addressing the need for proven and effective climate-smart agricultural options, CCAFS has developed the Climate-Smart Village (CSV) approach as a means to agricultural research for development (AR4D). It seeks to fill knowledge gaps and stimulate scaling of climate-smart agriculture (CSA). The CSV approach is founded on the principles of participatory action research for grounding research on appropriate and location/context-specific enabling conditions, generating greater evidence of CSA effectiveness in a real-life setting and facilitating codevelopment of scaling mechanisms towards landscapes, subnational and national levels. In establishing a CSV-AR4D site, the very first step is to build trust and partnerships amongst diverse stakeholders; and to attain agreements and buy-in to a common approach. Once partners have agreed on the establishment of a CSV site, the major steps include baseline assessment, identification and context specific prioritization of CSA interventions, evaluation and development of portfolios of weatherresilient interventions, and scaling up through institutions and policies, and scaling out to large areas through dissemination and ICTbased approaches. Communication of timely and relevant information on climate change risks through credible sources is essential for mobilising farmers to take actions to adapt to climate change.SECTION 1 Out of the total rice area in Odisha sixty five percent is rainfed and thirty five percent irrigated. Rainfed shallow and semi-deep water lowland rice suffers from flash floods and water logging. Like wise uncontrolled irrigation in lowlands also aggravates the problem of water logging. Heavy and intense rainfall events, sometimes tidal movements in coastal areas, cause flash floods due to overflow of rivers and canals. Normally 140-155 day duration varieties are grown in these risk prone ecosystem.Growing the most popular high yielding rice variety Swarna, covering seventy percent of the area, no doubt gives high yield and return but in years of flood, with even a week submergence the crop gets completely devastated resulting total yield loss and zero return.Rice variety Swarna-sub1, a variety developed by IRRI, Philippines and NRRI, Cuttack and released in 2009, is has submergence tolerance and performs better under flood situation apart from being high yielding with good grain quality. Demonstration of this variety in floodprone ecosystem showed that it could tolerate submergence up to two weeks and could perform significantly better compared to other local and improved cultivars.In farmers field, Swarna sub-1 produced 6.1 t/ ha yield and Rs.95,167 gross return per hectare with an B-C ratio of 2.01 as against Swarna (5.9 t/ha yield, Rs.92,040 gross return and 1.9 B-C ratio) under CCAFS (P 25) supported project. This provided Rs.4295 extra income to the farmers. Swarna is largely affected by stem borer which Swarna sub-1 escaped to certain extent and thereby saved two sprayings. The the production cost was reduced by Rs.1175 per hectare with energy saving of 89 MJ . In years with normal rainfall the yield is no less.There is yield advantage of 3.4% in normal years whereas in flood years it proved with more than 90% yield advantage. More over Swarna sub-1 is having a closed plant geometry unlike the spreading geometry of Swarna for which harvesting becomes easier, quicker and cheaper. The head rice recovery with hulling percentage in Swarna sub-1 was found to be nearly 80% as against 70% in Swarna. Moreover subsidy provision for Swarna sub-1 mobilized the farmers to increase area under this variety. Under such situation Swarna sub-1 is a savior for farmers which tolerates submergence even up to 17 days.In recent years Swarna sub-1 is popular and almost all farmers in the intervention village and nearby ones prefer Swarna sub-1 over other high yielding varieties including Swarna. Undoubtedly this will benefit thousands of poor farmers in Compendium | Climate-Smart Agriculture | 17 habiting the rainfed low land areas, who often do not harvest any crops due to floods.Rainfed shallow and semi-deep water lowland including flood prone/ submergence ecosystem in Odisha, accounting to nearly 1.5 million has can be brought under this and other submergence tolorent varieties which will act as a premium under challenging climatic scenario. It can be well fitted to the rice-pulse or ricefallow system.Rural Self Help Groups and innovative/ progressive farmers can take up the seed production programme to make them meet the growing demand for all the stress tolotant varieties including Swarna sub-1.Government of Odisha is already making significant efforts in strengthening the seed system of swarna sub-1. This can be achieved through seed hubs involving NGOs, SHGs and local seed dealers.Effect of Var.Bina Dhan-11 (lodging-tolerant) Lodging-resistant varieties that can withstand up to maturity in affected areas were demonstrated in CSVs. Var. Bina Dhan 11 was demonstrated in farmers fields in frequently affected areas.Although its duration was 5-7 days more, it sustained completely against lodging. It also registered tolerance to certain extent against BPH. Delayed harvesting also did not increase any shattering loss.The variety Bina Dhan 11 produced 5.8 t/ha yield with an yield advantage of 11.5% over Lalat (5.2 t/ha). The production cost was reduced by Rs.6435 with the B-C ratio of 1:8 (Lalat-1:4) saving around 10 labour days/ha. Therefore the variety Bina Dhan 11 has become quite popular and can substitute Lalat and act as a premium against lodging due to hail and thunder storm in summer and also can occupy a substantial area under kharif paddy. In addition the average yield of Bina Dhan 11 is around 7.0 t/ ha while others was around 6.0 t/ha.Summer paddy occupies eight per cent paddy area (0.3 million ha) in Odisha. Lalat being the dominant variety, Bina Dhan 11 can substitute it in irrigated medium land ecosystem more so in cyclone affected areas under rice-rice system.Rural Self Help Groups and advanced farmers can take up the seed production programme to make them meet the growing demand for all the stress tolotant varieties including Bina Dhan 11.With the help of appropriate extension strategy the coverage under Bina Dhan 11 can be expanded with involvement of NGOs and farmers organisations. Initial support through seed subsidy can make the process faster.Transplanting paddy under puddled condition has remained a common practice which involves lots of energy and high water used for puddling incurring higher cost. If conditions are not favorable, land preparation/puddling can not be carried out in time and transplanting gets delayed.Adoption of climate resilient conservation agriculture practice of non-puddled transplanted rice through access to appropriate farm machinery at reasonable cost brings precision to agricultural operations and efficiency in use of resources . Thus non puddled transplanting is a suitable substitute which enables transplanting with low water, energy and cost as well as timely establishment.Although the yield difference is not significant non-puddled transplanting (var. Swarna sub-1 in Kharif) yielded 5.82 t/ha with net return of Rs.43213 and B:C of 1.91 with the energy use efficiency of 7.8. The most important resource i.e. water consumed in puddling was just 1000 m 3 in non-puddled transplanting against 2500 m 3 in puddled transplanting. Energy in form of diesel fuel used for puddling was reduced by 12% (11 L/ ha). More importantly with less amount of water transplanting operation could be completed in time ensuring water availability to other areas. Not only paddy but the subsequent crop in sequence gets a favorable soil environment for better root growth.Non-puddled transplanting can be successful in place of puddled transplanting with less water and energy. Thus the area under transplanted paddy can be increased with available water resource.Non-puddled rice transplanting provides low land farmers with the same flexibility of timing and planting establishment with the onset of monsson rains as does the normal farmer practice.With the help of appropriate extension strategy the coverage under non-puddled transplanting can be expanded with involvement of NGOs and farmers' organisations. Initial support through incentive attached schemes under RKVY and NFSM can make the process faster.Rice-rice crop rotation has been practiced for decades. The summer rice which consumes huge quantity of water was grown with the lift irrigation water from river Ganga. This river carries most of the irrigation water sewage from Bhubaneswar city and is highly contaminated. In Kharif due to large flow in the river the contaminants get diluted. However in summer season gradually the water quality deteriorates and irrigation water causes irritation and skin diseases. Moreover, due to rising water requirement in summer season the flow in the said river is insufficient for raising summer paddy.Diversification strategies play a crucial role in ensuring food security under climate change, as they have the potential to address two of the CSA pillars by contributing to food security and adaptation to climate change.In search of a suitable alternative, green gram (var. IPM 02-14) was grown by utilizing the residual moisture from Rabi rice crop. With one supplemental irrigation at flowering or pod formation stage the crop performed well. This variety shows resistant to yellow vein mosaic Group of Farmers visited green gram and groundnut fields virus (YMV) which is quite common region in the locality. Under prevailing situation groundnut was also a suitable alternative and the variety 'Devi' was grown utilizing the residual moisture succeeding Kharif paddy. Green gram and groundnuts showed potential of diversification of rice-rice system in Odisha.In comparison to summer paddy green gram can be grown with 43.7% less fuel, 21.7% less labor, 48.5% less cost and a saving of 93.9% irrigation water (15,500 m3). The energy input in green gram was 3264 MJ/ha as against 44701 MJ/ha in summer paddy and energy use efficiency of 5.5 as against 2.6 in paddy. The green gram crop recorded a yield of 7.2 quintals/ha giving a paddy equivalent yield of 8.46t/ha in rice-green gram system. The drill seeded groundnut variety Devi yielded 21.4 quintal per hectare in 120 days with a paddy equivalent yield of 6.86 t/ha and system equivalent yield of 12.78 t/has as against 11.9 t/ha in rice-rice system. The yield advantage in rice-groundnut system was 7.3% as compared to rice-rice system. With an investment of Rs. 53,880 /-per hectare the groundnut crop realized a gross return of Rs.1,07,000 and net return of Rs. 53,120 per hectare and B-C ratio of 2.0. It could save 37.7% fuel, 41.6% energy and 100 % irrigation water.With less investment, less labour and less water green gram proved to be a better substitute to summer rice crop. Since the crop was harvested early (78 days) the gap between the succeeding summer rice and Kharif crop was sufficient enough to consider various options available. Now most of the farmers are switching over from `rice-rice system to rice-green gram system and the area is increasing.Most of the summer rice area, in well drained heavy soils, where water crisis is aggravating green gram can prove to be a suitable alternative for resource conservation and restoration of soil health. In comparatively light soil with high water retention capacity, ground nut is more payee if seed material is made available in time to sow the crop with residual moisture.With the support of farmer groups, development department and ICAR research project, OUAT and IRRI could make the beginning. State department of agriculture-extension wing, seed supply agencies, farmers organisations may put joint effort to diversify the summer paddy area and bring it under energy rich pulse (green gram) and oilseed (groundnut) crops.Storing seed groundnut by women farmers using CaCl 2 can ensure seed availability for timely sowing, make best use of residual moisture, can store better seed lot and save the cost. The produce (both green gram and groundnut) can be further processed for value addition and can be sold with a higher margins for improving the incomes.Schemes like RKVY, NFSM and BGREI can provide support to strengthen the stake holders and farmers in the mission. Farmer producer groups can support in marketing and save against distress sale.Rainfed agriculture in India plays an important role in the livelihoods of many rural households in semi-arid regions. These households are highly vulnerable to the adverse impacts of climate variability and change especially drought and heat stress. Government of India is investing and promoting different adaptation options to overcome the adverse impacts of climate variability in rainfed farming and to build household resilience through different programs.The adoption of one or two CSA technologies or practices may increase the crop yield or resource use efficiency but does not improve the overall farm household resilience to persistent climate variability or change e in the future. So under a multi-disciplinary project called AgMIP (http://www.agmip.org/), a location specific regional climate smart adaptation package (including biophysical, socio-economic and policy components) was developed through series of stakeholder consultation in the region and evaluated to understand the potential of the CSA package in the Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh.To reduce the risk of climate change on overall farm income and particularly on rainfed farming in state of Andhra Pradesh, possible adaptation options were framed based on discussions with various stakeholders. Since the agriculture production system in the regions is mostly rainfed (61% of the total cropped area) and is affected by variability and distribution of monsoon rainfall, we designed the adaptation package to be climate-smart to make the production systems more resilient to climate variability. The adaptation package is a combination of different biophysical and socioeconomic interventions like use of new crop cultivars (short duration, high yielding for major crop like chickpea), introduction of new crop in the kharif season (foxtail millet) to increase the system productivity since the majority of the farmers practice fallow-chickpea cropping system in the black cotton soil (vertisols) region in the State. We also included the provision of critical irrigation at 60 DAS through harvested rain water in a farm ponds, reduction in the cost of production as a result of application of fertilizer as per scientific recommendations (20 Kg N), and use of mechanical harvesters to reduce harvesting costs by Rs.2200 per ha.The evaluation of adaptation strategies (combination of biophysical, economic and policy options) across diverse farms in Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh using the multi-model approach revealed:• Increase in the chickpea productivity on average by 40% in the district by adopting • Increase in the per capita income by 34%• Reduction in the poverty rate in the region from 26.8% to 16.4% across the farm households in Kurnool district• The CSA package developed in consultation with different stakeholders in the state is having high scope to upscale in the rainfed farming region where the farmers practice Fallow-Chickpea cropping system. The new crop (foxtail millet) and high yielding drought tolerant chickpea cultivar as part of adaptation package will increase the system productivity as well as farm income especially in the drought year than in the normal rainfall year in the region. Due to labour scarcity and high wage rate during the peak harvest season in the state, the department of Agriculture and Agriculture University is now developing and promoting machine harvestable Chickpea cultivar in the regions. The construction of farm ponds in the fields to provide lifesaving irrigation to the crops will increase the water efficiency at the field level.• Currently during harvest season chickpea cultivation in the regions demands high women labour for harvesting, threshing and cleaning of grains. But if the adoption of machine harvestable chickpea cultivars will reduce the drudgery of the women labour and they could use this additional time to create alternative source of income and also social and household empowerment. This CSA package could also have potential to provide entrepreneurship to the youth in the region by establishing custom hiring centers and millet and pulses processing units to add value to the locally produced grains.The adoption of machine harvestable chickpea cultivar in the regions will help to develop local entrepreneurs/business to provide custom hiring services of combined harvester for harvesting and threshing of chickpea in the field. There is also scope for small millet processing unit as business for youth or local agro-entrepreneurs to process and add value to the small millets produced in the region. It has large business opportunity in the urban food markets.The In CIMMYT-Asia maize program, we focused on to enhance resilience in maize germplasm for an array of climatic conditions. The overarching goal of the stress-resilience maize program has been to improve upside yield potential with downside risk reduction. The new generation of stress-resilient hybrids possess combination of traits, including tolerance to drought/ waterlogging/heat stress and resistance to key diseases with respectable yields under optimal trial. These hybrids were licensed to partners (on semi-exclusive basis), including OUAT and two Odisha based SMEs. These high-yielding stress-resilient hybrids is being taken forward for deployment and scale-out to reduce yield losses under stress-prone growing conditions at farmer's field.• At least 2.0 tones more yield under stressful conditions and at par with commercial seed company hybrids optimal conditions.• At least 20% less irrigation water and enhanced nutrient use efficiency due to stress tolerance The problems like food insecurity, high investment flooded, water requirements are reduced, generally by 25-50%.• The system does not require purchase of new varieties of seed, chemical fertilizer, or agrochemical inputs. Costs of production are usually reduced, usually by 10-20%, although this percentage varies according to the inputintensity of farmers' current production.• Saving in terms of labour by 30 to 35 % due to less population of plants transplanted, mechanized weeding and harvesting is easier.• Reduction in drudgery of women in transplanting, weeding and harvesting operations.• Household food security has increased with additional availability of food for 5-8 months from own consumption.• There is increase in income of the farmers as they have surplus for selling. The net income has been increased up to Rs 15,000 to 25,000 per season.• Organic matter-enriched soils are able to store more water and furnish nutrients helping to develop strong root system resulting in a robust plant physiology that is more adapted to climatic adversities.• It has been observed that the plants under the system of crop intensification can sustain drought like situations, submergence and strong winds due to its stronger root systems.• Methane (CH 4 ) is reduced by between 22% and 64% when soils are maintained under mostly aerobic conditions rather than being flooded.Under the crop management system nitrous oxide (N 2 O) is only slightly increased or sometimes even reduced as the use of N fertilizer is reduced; N 2 0 increases do not offset CH 4 reductions, so Global Warming Potential is reduced.There is scope to scale up the technology under the rain fed farming systems and also to address water stress and adverse climatic conditions costs, water scarcity and climate change affects require a paradigm shift in the cropping systems from input intensive methods to improved practices like system of crop intensification. System of Rice Intensification is an innovative method for higher yield, water saving, and coping with the adverse effects of climate change, having at the same time considerable impact on green house gas emissions with a net reduction of 20-40% per ha and more per kg. of rice produced because of different practices for plant, soil, water and organic ways of nutrient management.In addition SRI is estimated to reduce fresh water use in rice cultivation by about 40-50% which is already established by research.The practices of crop intensification are also applicable to production of finger millets and other crops for increasing productivity to almost double in comparison to traditional practices while withstanding climatic stress to reduce the hunger gap and nutritional insufficiency.System of crop intensification in these staple crops can addresses the major constraints affecting the livelihoods of small and resource poor farmers, their limited resources of land, labour, water as well as losses from pests and diseases while reducing their dependency on external inputs.System of crop intensification especially in rice and millets is an innovation in technology that can adapt to changing climate and withstand adverse affects of climate change. The technology changes the way that the plants, soil, water and nutrients are managed and has multiple impact.• The yield increases by almost double in comparison to traditional methods of rice and millet cultivation. The yield per acre paddy has increased on an average to 16 qnt per acre in SRI from 8 to 9 qnt per acre in traditional transplanting method. Similarly, the production of finger millet has increased from 4 qnt per acre in traditional transplanting to 8-9 qnt per acre due to system of millet intensification.• Since SRI fields are not kept continuously which is beneficial for the small and marginal farmers of Odisha for food security, increase their income level and also at the same time to reduce the investment cost in inputs to reduce the vulnerability to debt and distress migration.As the land under cultivation is decreasing, water resources are getting scarce and climatic conditions are fragile, the technology can provide solution to the need of small and marginal farmers by optimum use of existing resources.As women are involved in 60-70 % of operations in rice and millet farming, it is necessary to enhance their skills, access to inputs, information and drudgery reduction technologies, organise their collectives for value addition and market linkages so that they can be involved in a more productive manner. The introduction of mechanized weeding, primary processing like threshing of millets have reduced drudgery of women which need further scale up. • OXFAM supported for introducing SRI in 2006.Government of Odisha under the RKVY Scheme.• NABARD supported for Seed Village programme with SRI.• Tata Trusts supported from 2008 till date for promotion of SRI & SMI which is scaled up to 15471 Farmers.• Odisha Millet Mission supporting for promotion of SMI.• IRRI supported Stress Tolerant Varieties of Rice.• Edel Give Foundation supporting for system of crop intensification.• Digital Green supported for video based extension systems for scale up.The Odisha Millet Mission is providing incentive to the farmers for adoption of System of Millet Intensification and also establishment of value addition and marketing of millets. The Government is also including millets in the Food Security Schemes which will encourage farmers to adopt SMI to increase production. The Centrally Sponsored Scheme, National Food Security Mission (NFSM) launched from 2007-08 in the State has also one of the objective to increase production of rice through SRI.However, there is further need of policy support for promotion of crop intensification in the context of climate change and the condition of small and marginal farmers which will reduce their investment in inputs as well as infrastructures for assured crop production.Improved fodder variety for better livestock productivityLivestock plays an important role for reducing the poverty in a mixed farming system that predominants in Odisha. It contributes around 20 per cent of the agricultural GDP of the State. Feed cost constitutes the major share (60 per cent) of cost livestock rearing. Therefore, judicious feeding mechanism is the most important pillar of economical dairying and also livestock rearing. The farmers in Odisha mostly depend on paddy straw, however they don't do any processing/treatment before feeding to their animals which extract minerals like calcium from body by forming oxalate salt. In addition, due to erratic rainfall, declining grazing land and use of harvestor for rice harvesting. It is estimated that Odisha has shortage of more than 80 per cent of concentrate, 55 per cent of green fodder and 30 per cent of dry fodder. To improve the livestock productivity in the state, it is required to improve the feeding management practice though grazing land management, increase feed efficiency, supplementary feeding and thereby reducing the enteric emission. As state has only 37% cultivated land is under irrigation, drought tolerance perennial fodder variety can be promoted.The increasing of crossbreed population and declining grazing land, demand for concentrate and green fodder is increasing. However, due to lack of water, market failure, lack of institutional support and low level of knowledge on fodder cultivation led to shortage of feed. In this context, promoting new variety of fodder with less water requirement and having high nutrient content is a viable alternative for increasing the feed and fodder availability in the state. In addition, identification of locally available good quality of feed and fodder in a particular zone and enrichment of those would help to increase the livestock productivity.ILRI has been promoting the new varieties of fodder crops such as drought tolerance perennial sorghum (COFS-29 and COFS-31) and new variety Hybrid Napier Bajra (CO-5 and Sampoorna) and fodder trees (Agasti, Morigna and Hedge leucern). In addition, new feeding practices based on availability of local feed and fodder. This gives an opportunity to farmers for improve their livestock productivity.Improved feed and management practice will reduce the cost of livestock production.Cultivating new variety of fodder and following better management practice will enable us to mitigate the effects of climate change and thereby increasing the productivity in following ways:Reduced the cost of milk production/feed up to 45%.• Increased the milk quality (FAT) by 10%• Increased milk yield by 20 %• Reduced dependency on the grazing land• Increased the digestibility and that leads to reduce the methane emission.• Increase the total income of the farmers by 6000 per lactation.There is scope to upscale the new feeding practices and fodder cultivation in dairy potential areas of the State.Dairying at household level is largely the domain of women, where they are actively involved in various aspects of dairy farming activities like care of new born calf, cleaning of animal shed, cleaning of utensils, and storage of feed, feeding, grooming and cleaning animals. It is possible to enhance the access of technologies, inputs, credits and markets and result in elimination of gender differences and discriminations in rural areas. As the demand fodder is goring in milk intensive areas, commercial green fodder production/seed production provide a unique opportunity for employment or rural youth. By creating and establishing the fodder group/ cooperatives, it is envisaged that many rural enterprises come up and employments are generated in their real life situations.As informed, Odisha has shortage of feed especially concentrate and green fodder. This can be enhanced only through community and promoting through local service provider.Taking up this into a larger area can help to service provider for develop the business case of supplying fodder block, feed blocks, chopping and such others as a viable option.With whom the intervention was developed: On upland plateau, rice farming is becoming highly vulnerable to in-season drought. The area consists of light textured soil so doesn't hold moisture for enough time to support rice during dry spells. Frequent post-monsoon showers also coincide with rice harvesting that leads to crop lodging and inferior grain quality.Alternatively, maize has been tested to withstand such scenarios more effectively. In-season drought of this degree merely affect maize crop and post-monsoon showers can be avoided by selecting maize varieties of longer duration.Problem associated with maize farming is use of traditional maize varieties under traditional production practices. These varieties produce abysmally low yield and have no takers in the market as commercial produce. Small and fragmented incomes are made through sale of green cobs only. Altogether, it puts growers under serious food and income security.Production of commercial maize under best bet agronomic practices is the intervention to address climatic risks and ensure income security. Commercial maize means cultivation of hybrids those can be readily bought by institutional buyers. These hybrids should be of long maturity class (120 days) as their yield potential is high and they can surpass postmonsoon rains. Best bet agronomic practices include planting in rows with optimal plant population, appropriate fertilizer application and proper weed management. Maize planting in rows should be preferably done through seed-cumfertilizer drill. Fertilizers should be applied at the rate of 150 kg urea, 100 kg DAP & 80 kg potash per hectare. In addition, 5-10 tones/ha of compost should be applied. Good weed management can be achieved through application of one postemergence herbicide followed by one manual/ mechanical weeding. Weeding should be performed by mechanical power weeder that would reduce cost by performing weeding and earthing-up in one single go. Output market integration can be achieved through produce aggregation at village level and establishing linkages with the proximate feed millers.• Increase in Yield -This intervention increases maize yield from an average of 3 ton/ha to 6 ton/ha.• Improvement in resource use efficiencies -Use of seed-cum-fertilizer drill amplifies fertilizer use efficiency by precise placement of basal fertilizers in right quantity. Seed rate is also calibrated as per desired plant population of 75,000 plants per ha. Power weeder improves efficiency of urea by immediate earthing-up.• Increase in Net Profit -With established output market, the intervention has potential to generate net income of Rs 40,000 per ha.The average gross revenue per ha is Rs 75,000. Out of which, Rs 35,000 is cost of cultivation taking all cost factors into consideration.Occurrence of in-season drought and postmonsoon rains are the two major climatic aberrations. Shifting to maize from rice overcomes the challenge of in-season drought as the water requirement of maize is comparatively lower than rice. Selection of long duration maize hybrids avoids risks associated with postmonsoon rains.Gender relevance: Several women based selfhelp groups (SHG) have been formed in this region under livelihood mission program of the state. These women SHGs are takingup this intervention as an income generating opportunity. Although they either own little farm land or no land, they are taking large tracts on rent and practicing this intervention. So far, almost 1500 women farmers are engaged in Mayurbhanj & Keonjhar districts for commercial maize production.Service providers: There are three areas under this intervention where agriculture machine service provision model operates. These areplanting by seed-cum-fertilizer drill, weeding by power weeder and threshing by maize sheller. Individual farmer from the community buy any of these three machine or multiple machines on Govt. subsidy and provide service to neighboring farmers on rental basis.Produce aggregator: People from the community who have some background of business dealings, buy maize produce from individual farmers in the village. They perform drying and cleaning based on buyers requirement and finally sell it in bulk after keeping their margin. Some of the service providers are also involved in this kind of business. Subsidy program for farm mechanization accelerates the purchase of number of seedcum-fertilizer drills and power weeder. e-NAM scheme can greatly help in establishing market linkages for maize produce.Rice is predominantly cultivated in Odisha of which nearly fifty per cent is transplanted.Transplanting requires at least 25 ha-cm of water for puddling operation, which creates a dense clay layer in the sub-soil to prevent seepage losses. The crop requires about 130 ± 10 ha-cm of irrigation in addition to adoption of suitable variety and recommended dose of fertilizers to realize yield levels of above 6 t/ha. Generally, about 40% of all irrigation water goes to paddy cultivation in the region. It is estimated that flooded rice fields produce about 10% of global methane emissions. Also, injudicious use of nitrogenous fertilizers is a common feature in paddy cultivation which is a source of nitrous oxide emissions. In Odisha, farmers generally take up transplanting of coarse rice. The current practice of excessive exploitation of ground water has led to a decline in the quality of natural resources i.e. land and water.A comprehensive water management programme was conducted for the farmers. Different methods of irrigation were discussed including DSR. Direct Seeded Rice reduced water use by reducing the number of irrigation events required, it can reduce water use by up to 25%. It can help farmers cope with water scarcity and increase reliability of downstream irrigation water supply. It is also a water management practice in irrigated lowland rice that saves water and reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while maintaining yields.Researchers have developed suitable direct seeding alternatives to transplanted paddy. In DSR cultivation, raising of nursery for transplantation is done away with. Farmer can avoid the major problem faced in labour shortage for transplanting during peak demand. In case of delay in monsoon or shortage of water, DSR provides flexibility to take up direct sowing of paddy with a suitable duration variety to fit into the left over season. This allows timely sowing of the succeeding crop. Direct sown rice consumes relatively less water compared to transplanted flooded rice. Energy demand for pumping of irrigation water is also less and saving can be much higher during deficit rainfall situations.Direct seeding of paddy var. Lalat yielded 5.51 t/ha that was close to transplanted coarse rice was 5.6 t/ha. But with DSR there was a saving of about Rs 3300-4200 per hectare in labour cost and irrigation water. However, extra expenditure is required on herbicide applications. DSR with reduced tillage is an efficient resource conservation technology that holds promise in view of the following advantages:• Saving in water up to 25%• Sating in energy up to 27% of diesel as pumping energy is saved for field preparation, nursery raising, puddling and reduced frequency of applying irrigation water Direct sowing can be practiced for cultivating both coarse rice and basmati rice wherever feasible in all themedium and low land ecosystem. Direct seeded rice is relatively more popular in the rainfed rice growing tracts. There is scope to upscale the technology inrainfed well as irrigated rice growing areas in Odishato promote higher water use efficiency , to reduce cost and conserve agricultural resources.State department of agriculture, farmers organisations, OUAT and IRRI jointly are working hard in popularising the practice.Governmental support of incentivising through various schemes like RKVY, NFSM and BGREI puts lot of encouragement to farming community in adoption of the practice.Transplanted rice grown in irrigated and rainfed areas are increasingly facing water scarcity due to deficit rainfall, declining groundwater table due to insufficient recharge, late and limited release of irrigation water from canals or poor inflows into tanks. Land preparation for nursery and main field require copious amounts of water.It also involves huge labour force for nursery raising and subsequent transplanting. Water shortage at the transplanting time leads to delay in transplanting and thus use of over aged seedlings with limited tillering capacity. This is an issue that every farmer faces during both in kharif as well as in rabi seasons. Again, farmers also follow traditional method, termed \"shallow flood irrigation\" where the fields are submerged with a shallow water layer during most of the rice-growing season, resulting in high use of water.Water and labour saving AWD technique of irrigation in rice is a feasible option to reduce their irrigation water consumption in rice fields without compromising on yield. In AWD, irrigation water is applied a few days after the disappearance of the ponded water observed through irrigation tubes. Hence, the field gets alternately flooded and dried. The number of days of non-flooded soil between irrigations may vary depending on the number of factors such as soil type, weather, and crop growth stage.When grown in conventional irrigation system rice needs 16500 m 3 water (land preparation=700 m 3 , nursery raising 100 m 3 , puddling 2500 m 3 and main field irrigation =13200 m 3 ) whereas grown under alternate wetting and drying (AWD) system the rice crop needs 13200 m 3 (land preparation=700 m 3 , nursery raising 100 m 3 , puddling 2500 m 3 and main field irrigation =9900 m 3 ). Irrigation was scheduled in main field on depletion of water level below 15 cm in the perforated irrigation tube. In the main field alternate wetting and drying system consumed 33% less water, saving six numbers of irrigation.Alternate wetting and drying provide a way to change irrigation practices and it is regarded as one of the more important rice cultivation methods that can dramatically save freshwater.The saved water may be utilized in increasing area under low water consuming crops. The AWD irrigation was accompanied with irrigation via channels, which allowed exact water required into the field, the drainage was easier. Time required for irrigation also reduced. AWD method can increase grain yield because of enhancement in root respiration and growth, remobilization of carbon reserves from vegetative tissues to grains and grain-filling rate.AWD can reduce the cost of irrigation by reducing pumping costs and fuel consumption.This method could also reduce the labor costs by improving field conditions at harvest, allowing mechanical harvest. AWD leads to firmer soil conditions at harvest, which is suitable to operate machines in the field. Therefore, AWD increases net return of farmers.AWD provides the means for rice to adapt to water scarcity and at the same time mitigate greenhouse gas emissions by reduction in methane emissions. AWD reduces methane (CH 4 ) emission that is produced by the anaerobic decomposition of the organic material in the flooded paddy field. This method has been assumed to reduce CH 4 emissions by an average of 48% compared to continuous flooding.Alternate wetting and drying reduce cadmium accumulation in rice grains. It can dramatically reduce the concentration of arsenic in harvested rice grains. Periodic soil drying reduces the incidence of fungal diseases and other insect pests.The yield recorded under alternate wetting and drying irrigation system (var. Bina Dhan 11in summer season) was 5.88 t/ha as against 5.56 t/ha in conventional system giving as yield advantage of 5.8%. But the energy input was 38222 mJ/ha in alternate wetting and drying system whereas in conventional system it was 44701 mJ/ha saving 1500 mJ energy with energy use efficiency of 3.1 in AWD as against 2.5 in conventional irrigation system.In alternate wetting and drying system the production cost, gross return and net return realized was Rs.49784, Rs.91728, Rs.41944, respectively with B-C ratio of 1:87 whereas in conventional system it was Rs.51,284, Rs.86,732, Rs.35,452, respectively with B-C ratio of 1:64.Under CCAFS, AWD in paddy was demonstrated in 26 ha covering 23 farmers in Jayapur Patna, Kuanarpur and Taraboi Sasan villages in Odisha and resulted in an average increase in yield and benefit cost ratio compared to current practice of irrigation. There is scope for wider adoption of AWD in the state under summer rice and autumn rice, primarily grown with irrgated water.The practice can reach a large numbers of rice growers in the state through training and guidance from state department of agriculture, SAU, IRRI, department of water resources, directorate of water management etc supported by the National Mission on Sustainable Agriculture.Water being the most crucial and scarce resource formulating government policy to price it and imposing restriction on its use for rice farming may pressurise for its judicious use.The climate of Odisha is hot sub humid with hot summers and mild winters, the mean winter temperature and rainy days are most suitable for rice -pulse production. In Odisha, paddy crop is mainly cultivated in kharifseason covering 30.74 lakh hectare. Following this kharif paddy, only 18.51 lakh ha is cultivated in rabi, of which green gram covers 6.31 ha area grown under residual soil moisture, while other 12.2 lakh ha is left as fallow. Due to rise in temperature and susceptibility of existing varieties to YMV the crop yield of green gram is decresing resulting in increase in fallow. To address the growing concerns, there is a need to look at the climate resilient crop variety and practices to sustain and stabilize green gram productivity.The green gram var. IPM 02-14 was introduced in Rice-fallow/pulse cropping. In this system rice is harvested early, allowing to cultivate pulses to take advantage of the residual moisture stored in the soil with minimum tillage. To utilise the stored moisture effectively, green gram is drill seeded instead of traditional broadcasting. Yellow sticky trap (YST) was installed to protect the crop from YMV by trapping the vectors.Drill seeding ensured sufficient plant population through proper utilization of residual moisture. Green gram var. IPM 02-14 was tolerant to high temperature, With YST, it was found free from YMV. As a result, it yielded (7.2 q/ha) advantage of 57 per cent over the broadcasted traditional variety. The gross return realized was Rs 41,40012 Contribution from S. Biswal and T. Panigrahi , OUAT, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha with a B-C ratio of 1:6Scaling: Scope and pathwaysRice pulse system with Green gram var. IPM 02-14 can be adopted in all the districts. However, districts with large area under rice fallows hold good potential to scale-up. By preferring shorter duration rice varieties this system can also be extended to the districts where rice fallow is predominant.Livelihood and employment opportunities can be created by enhancing the productivity and income through crop intensification.Value addition system (particularly, mini Dal mills and processing units in the vicinity of production areas) can provide additional employment and income to youths and farm women groups.Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology (OUAT), IRRI and State department of agriculture.Through convergence of different initiatives and missions this can leave useful options for increasing productivity and income in all the thirty districts of Odisha in partnership with the Department of Agriculture, OUAT, IRRI etc.Integrated weed management is the key for climate change adaptation and decreases dependence on chemicals 1.13. Integrating weed management (IWM) technology for higher productivity 1313 Contribution from S. Biswal, OUAT, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha and Sanjoy Saha, ICAR-NRRI, Cuttack, OdishaWeed causes major yield loss in both direct seeded and transplanted rice crop. It involves lots of labour force for weeding. But due to labour crisis weeding is delayed which not only reduces crop yield but also becomes a source for spread of insect and diseases.Integrating the manual, mechanical and chemical means of weed control not only reduced cost of production but also timely operation resulted in higher yield. Application of Pretilachlor within two days after transplanting at 1.0 l/ha followed by a mechanical weeding by rotary weeder or conoweeder three weeks after transplanting controlled maximum weeds. The rest of the weeds were removed manually at six weeks after transplanting.In village Jayapurpatna in Khorda district farmers used IWM technology and by this There is scope to upscale the technology in the rainfed as well as irrigated rice growing areas in Odisha. Integrating weed management practices has a potential to reduce production cost and to improve rice productivity and profitability. Minimum use of herbicide but timely application combined with mechanical and manual approaches can minimise the crop weed competition.IRRI, DAFE of Odisha, OUAT, and NRRIProviding mechanical weeder and proper herbicides at a subsidised cost and capacity building can build up the confidence of the farmers for wider use. This can reduce the chemical load as well as the GHG emission.Odisha, the state on the south-eastern fringes of India, is largely producer and consumer of rice; however, the average state productivity is quite low as compared to the national average. SSNM based approach for irrigated rice developed and evaluated and found suitable for RCM to make better decisions on key nutrient management adjusting nutrient application for smallholding farmers of Odisha. For rainfed conditions, SSNM based method developed and further evaluation through on-farm testing carried out in different agro-ecological zones of Odisha.The idea behind this decision support tool is to apprehend through the study to sort out the fertility issues that have the thought-provoking constraint for yield under rainfed scenario due to unpredictable water situation. Farmers, in this region, often apply fertilizers inefficiently, unaware of the concept and benefits of sitespecific nutrient management. It results in lower yields and poor soil health. SSNM based approach ensures better nutrient management under both rainfed and irrigated conditions. In rainfed scenario water availability at the time of fertilizer application is measured as helpful and helps to improve the agronomic efficiency of the applied nutrient. SSNM approach considers the integrated nutrient management (INM) system considering all available sources of nutrients and implies use of nutrients based on supply and demand concept for particular field to improve productivity and soil health.Odisha lies in the in the tropical belt of India and occupies only 3% of total rice area in India but shares 7% of India's total rice production. Farming is the main occupation and rice is the chief source of energy for the people of the state. The recommended dose of fertilizers in the RCM plot was estimated through one-to-one interviews with the farmers using RCM tool. In FFP, the nutrient management information was collected from the farmers before the start of the experiment and used by researchers to monitor the time and amount of application during the season. Except for differences in fertilizer rate, timing, and variety in these plots, all other management practices were same. At maturity, the crop cut was done in the presence of farmers, extension workers, and government officials to observe, witness, and evaluate the treatments.Use of RCM based recommendations reported a yield advantage of 21-22 percent over FFP (0.73 t/ ha with FV and 0.77 t/ ha with STRVs). Use of RCM recommendation along with STRVs realised a benefit of 283$/ ha from rice yield over FFP with FV (minimum support price for rice is 23.97 $ /q). The net added benefit in RCM +STRV treatment was 276$/ ha (fertilizer cost for RCM plot is 7$ more over FFP).There is scope to upscale the technology in the rainfed rice growing areas in Odisha as RCM has a potential to improve rice productivity and profitability in rainfed environments. This is possible either by increasing the yield or decreasing the fertilizer cost or a combination of both. Application of fertilizers at times when it is required increases the nutrient use efficiencies.Correcting the time and amount of fertilizer not only increase crop yield but could be a better option for soil health management by saving the fertilizer loss to atmosphere and water bodies.Gender and youth, considered as a factor for planning and implementing the agricultural programmes, has always scope to enhance the access of technologies, inputs, credits and markets, ultimately, result in elimination of gender differences and discriminations in rural area. Also, it created awareness among rural youth for better nutrient management practices. During studies it was observed that in RCM technology, women's and youth's role (either as an individual or collective) was more pronounced in decision making. Gender sensitized rice production among tribal farmwomen of Odisha through RCM technology approach resulted in enhanced knowledge level, productivity and income.Taking up RCM in larger areas on community basis can help to service providers for develop business case of printed sheet when disseminated by input dealers and agro-based community service centers. To harness the benefits, a small cost of the printed sheet could motivate to use this technology. Thrust may be given for popularization of low cost smart phone and internet facilities for making this technology a viable option for nutrient management.IRRI, DAFE of Odisha, OUAT, and NRRIA centrally sponsored Soil health card mission and National Food Security Mission (NFSM) has been launched from 2007-08 in the State with the objective of increasing production of rice and pulses through area expansion and productivity enhancement in a sustainable manner in the identified districts. DAFE/NRRI/OUAT will have to own this technology for more outreach.Irrigation covers about 54% of agriculture land in Odisha and about 21% of total irrigated area is covered by lifting underground water with tubewell and electric or fossil fuel-based pumps. For many farmers, poor irrigation systems, the high cost of pumping groundwater and limited access to electricity are major problems. As their costs fall, solar irrigation pumps could replace farmers to use solar energy to pump water during periods of rainfall defficit can provide big opportunity in agriculture.In Establishment of solar panels for solar pump is an economic method of irrigation 15 Contribution from Arun Khatri-Chhetri, CCAFS, BISA, New Delhi and Tushar Sahah, IWMI, Ananda, Gujarat, India farmers did not need irrigation.The pilot project has generated income from both the improvement in agricultural production and the sale of surplus energy. It has also promoted a range of CSA interventions, such as efficient technologies for water use in vegetable farming, improved seed and nutrient management, minimum tillage, and introduction of crops that require less water. Cooperative members use solar energy to irrigate their own crops and sell irrigation services to neighbouring farmers before selling the residual energy to the power company.Figure 26 shows the changing dynamics of electricity generated and irrigation use. Between January and May (the dry season), cooperative membershad solar energy to meet their own and their neighbors'irrigation needs, and from May 2016 they could sell it to the power company. This model was also effective in reducing the use of power and water in agriculture without impinging on farmer incomes. The program could be of great significance for Himachal Pradesh given its small but critical water requirements for open and polyhouse cultivation, abundance of small streams and rivulets for water lifting, and the dispersion and remoteness of its farms, orchards, and pastures, not all of which can be connected to the power grid.Varietal difference in growth of rice crop 16 Contribution from Swati Nayak, Mosharaf Hossain and Mukund Variar, IRRI, New Delhi, IndiaThe state of Odisha is known for recurrent events of flood and drought year after year in the coastal and inland districts respectively. Though the quantum of seasonal rainfall has not changed drastically during the last 25 years, the distribution has been erratic, with longer drought spells and intensive precipitation occuring more frequently and causing distress to farmers. Incidence of drought and flood occurring within the same season further complicate the already delicate situation in some years. Every alternate year and sometimes consecutive years have witnessed serious crop loss or damage due to these climatic stresses. Many poor and marginal farming households are, therefore, at the peril of food and livelihood insecurity. Rice being the predominant food crop covering 69% of the cultivated area in the state, losses resulting from reduced productivity and production are substantial. Given this vulnerability of millions of farmers of the region, climate resilient rice varieties are one of the necessary adaptation strategies to reduce the risk and sustain production.Climate resilient rice varieties often popularly known as STRVs (stress tolerant rice varieties) have been developed to make the crop remain unaffected or relatively less affected compared to other high yielding varieties under stress conditions like drought, flood or salinity. When • Nearly 15 released in the STRVs pipeline have been tested under the local ecology through comparative trials. Sub 1 genes are now incorporated in a number of genetic backgrounds.• 40 varietal cafeterias have been hosted as evidence hubs for multi-variety comparative trials. These hubs have been connected with different stakeholders for participatory evaluation and ratings.• The stakeholders who have been part of joint evaluation and selection of suitable varieties are local government agriculture officers, KVK scientists, farmers, dealers, researchers, seed production officers, pvt.seed entrepreneurs, NGOs.• Drought tolerant varieties have been tested in more than 3000 ha under upland ecology through direct interventions and demonstrations in last 3 years (2016-2018)• More than 9000 ha was covered under comparative trials and demonstrations in lowland ecology in the state in flood affected districts in 3 years.• Apart from above direct coverage under trials/ demonstrations, there is an expected spill over/multiplier effect in terms of farmer saved/ sold/shared seeds gradually increasing the area by approximately by 55000 ha in last 2 years alone (with an estimated rate of 5-10% of harvest being reused or distributed as seed).• Apart from this; OSSC, and local seed entrepreneurs steadily increasing the volume of STRV in their supply channel, many more new farmers are being reached out year after year.• Awareness creation through demonstrations have led to higher seed demand for Bina Dhan 11, Sahbhagi Dhan, DRR 44 which have been brought under seed chain by state seed corporation.• Breeder seed demand for STRVs for Kharif 2019 is about 55% of the total seed indent by the Department of Agriculture, Odisha. State Seed Corporation and/or private seed producers have sourced and converted breeder and foundation seeds to certified seeds to make it available to farmers in different districts.• STRV like Sahabahagidhan and DRR 44 have shown average yield advantage of 0.43 t/ha to 0.5 t/ha against local checks under stress (11-15 days of drought spells).• Bina Dhan 11, a flood tolerant variety, gave average yield advantage of 0.5 t/ ha under 14 days of submergence. Being early in duration, this variety provides the required time window to grow an additional crop after rice harvest. The variety is also getting popular in the rabi season because of its ideal duration, nonlodging character and high productivity.In order to accelerate the adoption for climate resilient varieties, there needs to be integrated effort to strengthen not only the seed systems for the new varieties but also the delivery systems for same.i) Farmer centric learning: The adoption rate could be triggered with farmer led learning process and making them participate in scientific evaluation of varieties under their own farm conditions.ii) Engaging extension functionaries: Extension agents from public, private or civil society sector are the major agents of change for taking the varietal knowledge to farmers and playing role in motivating them for their adoption. They could play a key role in mobilization as well. Creating learning platforms and appropriate linkage for these agents can make the difference.iii) Strengthening seed systems: Both formal and informal seed systems need to be strengthened for new varieties for sustained adoption. Creating institutional linkage for breeder seed, engaging government stakeholders, public seed corporation and private companies for varietal evaluation process can create better policy avenues and planned procurement/production of seeds in formal chain. Similarly capitalizing the strength of various community institutions of farmers and especially women; informal seed production and dissemination can also be triggered through capacity building.iv) Engaging seed delivery agents/dealers: Empowering dealers through exposure to varieties by organized trials supervised them and linking them to various varietal evaluation, selection and promotion platforms / events can lead to creation of market demand as well as supply of seeds. Dwindling surface water has forced the farmers to access aquifers to meet the agricultural water demand. Electric and diesel pumps have taken over the traditional pumping mechanisms, which were rendered dysfunctional due to decreasing ground water level. Currently, 30 million irrigation pumps are being used throughout the country (out of which around 70% use electricity while 30 percent rely on diesel).In order to meet the Nationally Determined Contribution of India, Solar Powered Irrigation Systems offer a way to adapt agricultural water management to Climate Change.Solar Powered Irrigation System (SPIS) offers a climate-smart and sustainable approach to simultaneously extend the area under irrigation while using renewable source of energy. SPIS offers both adaptive and mitigating benefits to curtail climate change, through solarisation of agriculture and agricultural pumping. Burgeoning technological innovations are reducing the investment cost required for owning solar powered irrigation systems (SPIS). This coupled with substantial amount of subsidy schemes being rolled out by the present government is giving necessary fillip to SPIS installations.With increasing focus on solar energy use in agriculture, several pilots and models of solar irrigation systems have been rolled out in the country. It has led to significant increase in the income of the farmers while simultaneously abating the ever rising greenhouse gas emissions.It offers farms the opportunity to reduce the cost of energy by reducing the requirement to invest in diesel to run the pumps or be dependent on the vagaries of electricity supply. Solar power generation offers a solution which amalgamates clean energy technology with increased food production.• Increase in yield Almost all of the pilot interventions have been taken up with the support of some external agency such as national or international nonprofit organizations. These organization have supported the intervention in either or all of the ways: by providing funds; by providing access to technical knowledge; providing coordination support etc.With the existing institutional framework it is challenging to scale out and ensure subsistence of the Solar Powered Irrigation System Technology, without the support of grass-root level NGOs, funding organisations as well as knowledge partners. A policy which facilitates these organisations to extend their support to such scaling out initiatives is the need of the hour.KUSUM (Kisan Urja Suraksha Evam Utthaan Mahaabhiyan) Scheme launched by the government of India, aims to support farmers to use solar powered irrigation systems to meet the energy demand for agricultural water requirement.17 Contribution from Paresh Bhaskar, CCAFS, BISA, New Delhi, India Discussed between farmer and researcher about crop residue management 18 Contribution from S. Biswal, OUAT, Bhubneswar and D. S. Rana, IRRI, New Delhi, IndiaIn Odisha, paddy crop is cultivated mainly in kharif season covering 30.74 lakh hectare. Of this only 18.51 lakh ha is cultivated in rabi, while other 12.2 lakh ha is left as fallow. With growing labour crisis most of the farm operations are heading towards mechanisation particularly the sowing/ transplanting and harvesting and threshing of paddy. Use of combine harvester clears the land early within short period so that the rabi crop grown on residual moisture is sown in time. But it leaves the entire residue (straw/hay) in field which is not essentially reused by most farmers. It is also difficult to incorporate and decompose the residue in the following dry crop(puises and oilseeds). Collection and disposal of this huge biomass is also time consuming and expensive. Therefore the farmersprefer to burn the residues to clear the land for ease and timely sowing.This leads to increased CO emissions and also is a great loss to the farmer as well to the land, as the land is deprived of biomass that helps in build up of precious soil organic carbon.There are many already proven residue management practices that can help farmers adapt to the likely adverse effects of increasing weather variability and climate change, and that can, in many cases, also reduce agricultural greenhouse gas emissions.In order to encourage farmers to change this practice, residue incorporation/mulching is to be introduced in the selected villages. The residue can be chopped into small pieces, spread and incorporated in-situ thoroughly by machines with varying efficiencies depending upon the left over residue. This can be well decomposed within short period by use of microbial inoculation.It helps in early seedbed preparation soon after harvesting kharifcrops for sowing of rabicrops, improves the soil physical properties and hence, results in increased crop yield. Incorporation of crop residue adds both major and micronutrients into the soil. This results in saving of chemical fertilizersin long run. Residue or biomass incorporation builds up soil organic carbon which improves water retention capacity and benefits the crop. This practice of in situ incorporation of crop residues can bring about reduction in residue burning which aggravates GHG emissions and air pollution. The entire summer crops, portion of rabi crops (15 lakh ha) and kharif crops under exigency (31 lakh ha) are irrigated. canal is the main source of irrigation. However in summer season as the canal source is exhausted and in areas out of reach of canal command area irrigation is done mainly with minor irrigation sources by using diesel or electric water pumps. For most farmers, poor irrigation systems, the high cost of pumping groundwater, and limited access to electricity are major problems.The rising diesel cost and frequent power shredding in summer season, frequent damage to distribution systems by cyclones and over loading drags the crops to suffering.In CSVs, in situ incorporation of paddy and pules residues and biomass of green manuring crops can be scaled up across several districts.In CSVs the machine is to be made available through custom hiring centers for wider adoption by farmers for resource conservation to improve soil health and productivity and reduce GHG emission.In areas of paddy-pulse/oilseed cropping system or where a dry crop is taken in rabi preferably with residual soil moisture ammounting to around 15 lakh ha can be brought under machine harvest as well as residue incorporation in order to reduce GHG emission and increase soil health.Availability of machines in large scale even through custom hiring can encourage the farmers to opt for the practice. In this endeavour rural youth groups and custom hiring centres can play a major role.Bailing the residue using tractor mounted bailers and lifting them from field can clear the land for sowing as well as preserve the residue for further use. It can be used as potential animal feed after mixing additives or can be sold to paper industries or packaging industries for gainful return. Availability of machines in large scale through custom hiring can encourage the farmers to opt for the practice and can provide employment to the rural youths.Government ban on residue burning and incentive for recycling can encourage farmers for this greater cause.Solar Powered Irrigation Systems offer a way to adapt agricultural water management to Climate Change. As the costs falls and timely water supply is ensured, solar irrigation pumps could replace diesel or electric pumps a possibility the state government is aggressively popularizing. Moreover when crops do not require irrigation surplus project power may be sold to local grids to earn additional income.Apart from ensuring higher crop yields through timely farm operations and mitigating GHG emission and climatic risks it may also promote a range of CSA interventions, such as: efficient technologies for water use, improved seed and real time nutrient management, minimum tillage, and introduction of low water requiring crops.Like Gujrat , solar cooperatives may be formed where cooperative members use solar energy to irrigate own crops and sell irrigation services to neighbouring farmers before selling the balance energy to the local power company.The stakeholders, farmers,government officials, academicians, and representatives of the solar industry may visit the project location to better understand the model for stimulating significant state and national policy.The program could be of great significance for Odisha given its small but critical water requirements.The project may be initiated in small scale in pilot mode but it can spread to all the crop fields wherever and whenever irrigation is needed.State department of agriculture, OREDA, Power companies, NABARD, farmer cooperatives, NGOs, SHGs can join handsWomen farmer groups and rural youth organisations may start the project in business mode and sale irrigation water to local farmers and surplus energy to power grids .this can support the employment generation to a great extent that to in rural sector.Both the state and central government should liberally support the project by incentivising in several sectors.In rainfed areas, the window for taking up of timely farm operations like land preparation, sowing and inter-culture operations is quite narrow, especially in the low rainfall zones. Failing to exploit this limited window often leads to a compromise on productivity and resource use efficiency in crop production. On the other hand labour crisis at peak period of demand is a serious problem faced by farmers. Delayed farm activity especially sowing not only affects the current crop but also the crops in succession.In high rainfall areas dominated by heavy soils, drainage is more crucial to prevent damage to crop from excess soil moisture in the root zone.20 Contribution from S. Biswal, OUAT, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha and D.S. Rana, IRRI, New Delhi (India)Adoption of climate resilient practices are linked to timely access to appropriate farm machinery at reasonable cost. Several options are now available to increase the efficiency and timeliness of agricultural operations even on small farms by using farm machinery.Mechanization brings in timeliness, uniformity and precision to agricultural operations, greater field coverage over a short period, costeffectiveness, efficiency in use of resources and applied inputs, conservation of available soil moisture under stress conditions and provision of adequate drainage. Farm implements could successfully empower farmers to tide over the shortage of labour and improve efficiency of agricultural operations.Transplanting has remained as a potential establishment method. Manual transplanting is a common practice but with rising labour crisis and uncertainty in water availability sometimes it is delayed and done with age old seedlings resulting in yield reduction.Mechanization has come to the rescue under such disadvantage which saves around 40 labour days on uprooting and transplanting normal seedlings. For mechanical transplanting mat nursery has proved an additional advantage which saves 90% labour and 20-25 kg/ha seeds as against conventional method. With mechanical transplanting only five labours can assist in transplanting an hectare area. Uniform and shallow transplanting at 24 cm × 14 cm spacing with 3-4 seedling of 18 days old produced higher tillers (14-16/hill) as against manual transplanting (12-14/hill). The operations could be completed in time without affecting seedling age. As a result, a yield level of 6.2 t/ha could be realised with 14.8 per cent yield advantage. The net return was Rs 48,991 with B-C ratio of 2.03 under mechanical transplanting as against Rs 31,511 under manual transplanting.Similarly, using combine harvester could save 62 labourers and a cost up to Rs10175 from one hectare area with an added advantage of simultaneous threshing. By combine harvesting the cost and time period for threshing was saved which ensured early marketing in local Mandi; the subsequent crop is also sown in time to utilize residual moisture. Any one taking early maturity variety prefered to use the reaper for early harvest to utilise 100% straw similar to manual harvesting.Looking at the advantages of mechanical transplanting, supported by subsidized cost of procurement the no of transplanters in the CSVs is increasing at a faster rate. This can spread to all the transplanted areas either due to labour or water crisis. Harvesting through combine harvesters, being a group assignment is easily adopted to save the produce from cyclonic storms and heavy rain at the fag end of the crop. For hiring combine harvester all the farmers in a patch used to grow the same variety for synchronization in maturity which strengthens the cooperation.Hiring transplanters, combines also provides extra employment to the young farmers and solves the labour crisis to a great extent. Thus establishing custom hiring centers for mechanised farm operations has become the demand of the day. This can generate rural employment and also can modernise agriculture.State department of agriculture, agro-industries Corporation, implement factories, can join hands in making the progress faster.Liberally incentivising custom hiring centres to mechanised farming can mobilise farmers to modernise agriculture and make it climate resilient. This can be linked to various other schemes like RKVY, NFSM and BGREI etc. Factories for impements play a key role in this endeavour and therefore should also be promoted.Weather variability significantly affects crop yields. Clear understanding of climate helps in devising suitable management practices for taking advantage of the favourable weather conditions and avoiding or minimizing risks due to adverse weather conditions. Early planting is advantageous but in certain years, this is offset due to the presence of long dry spell after planting, which leads to seedling death and necessitates re-planting. There is a tendency for lower yields for late sowings beyond first week of August; because of the high risk of end-season long dry spells. Farmers having access to climate and weather information are more likely to take better crop management actions. Understanding of optimum sowing period, growing season characteristics with reference to rainfall pattern helps farmers in making informed decisions in designing strategic planting management options.Devanakonda Mandal in Kurnool district, Andhra Pradesh (AP), India, receives an annual rainfall of about 606 mm in 35 rainy days and groundnut is the major rainfed crop. ICRISAT and Microsoft have jointly taken up a pilot project under the Andhra Pradesh \"Rythu Kosam\" Project for disseminating sowing and other crop-management advisories to the rainfed groundnut farmers of Devanakonda. Farmers' Group Meetings were organized and 175 farmers have registered their mobile phone numbers for receiving sowing advisories. Historic climate data for 30-years (1986-2015) was used to understand the rainfed growing season characteristics and optimum sowing window was identified using PNUTGRO crop-growth simulation model. Beginning of groundnut crop growing period for the year 2016 was identified based on the Moisture Availability Index. Advisories were prepared both in Telugu (local language) and in English and were disseminated to the registered farmers during the groundnut crop-growing period of 2016. Advisories included recommendations on land preparation, soil-test based fertilizer application, FYM application, sowing, seed treatment, optimum sowing depth, preventive weed management, maintaining proper plant density, applying nutrients if needed, harvesting, shade drying of harvested pods and storage.Weather advisories brought climate awareness among groundnut farmers and encouraged them to initiate sowing at the optimum time. They followed weather-based agro advisories for proper crop management and obtained better yields and are out of loss compared to some farmers who have sown earlier. Some registered farmers who have sown as per our advisory have Inter-annual and intra-seasonal rainfall variability has become a reality, probably due to climate change, and many farmers are turning towards climate services and are seeking support on choices of climate smart crops and varieties and their optimum sowing windows. There is great scope to upscale this initiative in the rainfed groundnut and pigeonpea crop growing areas in Odishato reduce the risk of sowing failures and to promote better crop management practices based on medium range weather forecasts and advisories. India Meteorological Department (IMD) has initiated issue of weather forecasts at Block level and these will help in developing cropspecific agromet advisory services in Odisha.Women are unable to voice their specific requirements even though the impact of climateThe Intelligent Systems Advisory Tool (ISAT) 22 Contribution from Dakshina Murthy Kadiyala, KPC Rao, Ram Dhulipala, and Anthony Whitbread, ICRISAT, Patancheru, Telangana and Mithun Das Gupta&SoudaminiSreepada, Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd, Gachibowli, Hyderabad change affects women and men differently. It is therefore required to boost resilience of women and youth to climate change through climatesmart agriculture practices.Weather-based crop management services for the farmers are to be offered free of cost, as per current policy.ICRISAT is implementing a project supported by the Government of Odisha on \"Enhancing Agricultural Productivity and Rural Livelihoods through Scaling-up of Science-led Development in Odisha: Bhoochetana\". The objectives of the project include assessment of the nutrient status of agricultural soils and to identify the best soil, water, crop, and nutrient management options for increasing productivity in all the thirty districts of Odisha in partnership with the Department of Agriculture, OUAT and other partners from Odisha through convergence of different initiatives. Enhanced Agromet Advisory Services can be planned on a pilot scale for groundnut and pigeonpea in selected locations.In recent years, climate services have emerged as an important means to address the challenges posed by climate variability and change.Advances in climate and weather predictions have opened up new opportunities for smallholder farmers to better understand, anticipate and respond to the risks and opportunities presented by variable climatic conditions. At present, the forecast-based advisories tend to be generic and not very contextual due to use of district as a boundary which is very coarse for this type of service. Hence by taking advantage of the recent advances in climate science which made significant contribution to improve the availability and quality of climate information and using advanced analytical techniques and state of the art system simulation models there is a need to design and deploy an automated messaging system for smallholder farmers and extension workers to deliver real-time, locationspecific, crop-based, agro-advisories using scalable methodologies for managing climate risk.ICRISAT with its partners (Microsoft India Pvt. Ltd and ANGR Agricultural University) developed and deployed \"Intelligent Systems Advisory Tool (ISAT)\" which enables farmers to make informed decisions by providing them with tailored location and crop specific advisories communicated to their mobiles through Short Message Service (SMS). The whole process of delivering agro advisories starts with development of decision trees or algorithms for all the decisions depending on the time of sowing. In the decision tree, each branch represents a possible outcome or an action and the selection of most appropriate action is guided by the result of test conducted at different nodes in the tree. Hence, putting the decision tree into action involves getting or accessing real time data from various sources as required to test the criteria set at each node, evaluate the criteria and select the most appropriate action. Microsoft, India has developed the required algorithms and program to implement these steps. Messages were communicated initially at the beginning of the season on cropping systems to be followed based on the seasonal climate forecast released by IITM, Pune. The regular bi-weekly agro advisories during crop season were pushed automatically using last (previous?) week's actual weather data, coming week forecasted weather and two weeks weather outlook obtained from IMD. The contextual information thus provided, enables farmers to manage their farms more efficiently and profitably by making timely decisions and conducting operations with precision.• Nearly 79% of the farmers are satisfied with the weekly frequency of the messages • 93% of farmers from the project villages are satisfied with the coverage of various issues in the messages• About 58% of the farmers rated the information as \"mostly correct\" or \"correct 75% of the times\" and another 33% of the farmers rated as \"correct more than 50% of the times\"• About 78% farmers used the information for timely sowing, more than 66% farmers used the information in planning harvesting and 57% used it in scheduling spraying and fertilizer applications• On average 16.2% increase in groundnut yields achieved by farmers in treatment villages with access to climate information than by farmers in the control villages without access to climate informationThere are several SMS type platforms that exist which could be substantially improved by adopting the iSAT methodology. IKSL for example, currently has an ICT platform that makes available climate related advisories to about two million farmers mainly through SMS service. Integrating with existing commercial or government platforms will ensure that the project and the outputs are sustainable and have an opportunity to scale. It is also anticipated that many governments will find such knowledgebased systems extremely useful in making their extension systems effective by providing them with up-to-date location specific advisories using the methodology developed under this project.In India, women who play a key role in the decisions for many farm operations (e.g. enterprise selection, timely farm operations and alternative livelihood practices). By using gendered farmer and indigenous knowledge engagements, training and outreach to interpret and use probabilistic climate information, women will benefit equally from increased availability of relevant climate information, improving access to credit, and therein strengthening household food and nutrition security.There are several progressive IT solutions and services startup companies concentrating on agri business by focusing on effective use of information technology in India (specifically in the public sectors) for the benefit of farming communities. These startup companies are a free to use platform for communicating the climate information to the end users through mobile devices and web browsers. Different stakeholders of agriculture like farmers, traders, input dealers, Farmer Producer Organizations, students, scientists and researchers, etc., can use information from these platforms to share their needs, ask & answer questions, receive news & information like farm advisories, market linkages, etc., which can be a business model for the startupcompanies.• Microsoft India Pvt. Ltd.• ANGR Agricultural University• ICRISAT• Vasudhaika Software Private LimitedThe application could be linked can be integrated with any existing platform (e.g.IKSL) for sustainable scaling up. This tools can very well be integrated with the electronic agricultural extension systems that many state governments are promoting.Agricultural production is an outcome of biological activity highly sensitive to weather changes. Climate change impose negative effect on agricultural production through: (i) increasing the frequency of losses from extreme weather events including floods, droughts, and cyclones, (ii) changing absolute and relative variability of such losses, (iii) shifting spatial distribution of such losses, (iv) damage function increasing exponentially with weather intensity, (v) abrupt and non-linear changes in losses, (vi) widespread geographical simultaneity of losses, (vii) more single events with multiple correlated consequences. Thus with climate change, the agricultural risk will not only accentuate but also will become very complex and cumbersome process necessitating devising new mechanisms and measures to address such risks. Therefore, there is a great need for crop insurance with the following goals (Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana -PMFBY, 2016) 1) Financial support to farmers in the event of failure of crop as a result of natural calamities and pests, diseases etc.2) To encourage farmers to adopt progressive farming practices and improved technology in agriculture.3) To help stabilize farm incomesConsidering the number of farmers at risk, dynamic of the risks, moral hazards, and limited resources by governing and monitoring entities of PMFBY implementation in the state, at issue is how PMFBY program can effectively assess claims in the case of extreme weather events within the strict timely requirements stated in the policy.Earth observation and remote sensing technology facilitates effective monitoring of agricultural crops at large scale on a repetitive basis. In the case of lowland rice, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) option for earth observation is advantageous due to pervasive cloud cover during monsoon, the time most expansive time of rice cultivation and in the case of floods and cyclone events. Remote sensing technology especially when integrated with crop modeling approach can offer an attractive solution of nonbias and transparent loss assessment delivered within the required timing defined in PMFBY policy. Use of processed-based crop modeling allows yield information to be projected while season is still in progress thru incorporation of weather forecast allowing loss assessment in the case of weather extreme events (e.g. floods, droughts, and cyclone impacting rice production).Remote sensing approach supported with ground-truthing can reliably map start of season and rice growth indicators and thereby can effectively monitor whether any parts of monitoring coverage exhibit cases of preventive sowing and/or fail sowing. Rice area derived from remote sensing and delineation of it according to land ecosystem also useful for targeting sampling area for CCE for PMFBY. Integrating remote-sensing data and crop growth model is more promising than the empirical approach for yield estimation as the integration allows remotely sensed vegetation indices translated directly into crop yield and production values.The integration approach exploits the synergies between: (i) remote-sensing technology strength in capturing spatial and temporal variation related to agro-practices (e.g., crop establishment dates) and seasonal crop development (i.e. phenology) and vegetation status (e.g. leaf area index); and (ii) process-based crop growth model strength in reliably simulating yield by capturing biophysical growth drivers (microclimate, water, and nutrient). In addition to supporting risk reduction efforts by supporting crop insurance, the information from remote-sensing technology can be used to identify and target hot-spot areas for interventions to reduce yield gaps and optimize resource use to ensure sustainable rice production.IRRI implements remote sensing technology, specifically earth observation using cloud penetrating synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data, to timely monitor rice planting progression and provide in-season yield forecast. Multi-temporal SAR data (January to December, every 12 days) spanning across 3 tracks of Sentinel 1A and Sentinel 1B satellites are used for rice cultivated area extraction of Odisha during Kharif and Rabi seasons and for discrimination of land cover types to develop rice baseline map. Optical images from Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2 satellites were used to cross-check and verify rice area classification based on SAR data.• Developed a rice monitoring system for Odisha to provide accurate and timely estimates on rice area, yield and production along with planting date. during June, considered as Autumn rice along with mixed Autumn and early winter in July with 16% of area and 6% of late winter in September.• Yield estimation system was implemented based on integration of SAR data with ORYZA crop growth model using Rice Yield Estimation System (Rice-YES). RICE-YES interprets LAI maps from MAPScape-Rice to simulate yield accordingly while capturing meteorological and agronomic information through the use of spatially disaggregated weather data, varieties, soil, and nutrient management information.• Crop damage assessment in case of drought, flood, and cyclone for all rice-growing areas, to provide data and information derived from remote sensing to support implementation of Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) for paddy in Odisha.• During the wet and dry season, IRRI generated rice area map, estimated yield and provided flood maps affected by the cyclones 'Titli', during October 2018 and 'FANI, during May 2019. These efforts were followed by socioeconomic and policy research to identify factors that affect crop insurance uptake and ways to improve acceptance of the insurance scheme by bundling risk reducing technologies and other options.• Field level monitoring and damage assessment in case of floods and droughts using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) were deployed to complement information derived using satellite earth observation.• Local capacity building programmes and hands-on training sessions to NARES partners consisting of DoA staffs and the Odisha Space Applications Centre (ORSAC) staffs were conducted targeting know how of remote sensing data processing using MAP Scape-Rice software and yield mapping using Rice-Yield Estimation System (Rice-YES) software.Timely forecast of crop yield during mid-season are critical preparedness requirement against natural calamities. In the event of crop failure as a result of natural calamities and pests, diseases outbreak, key information needed for accessing economic loss relies on information of the expected productivity of the affected farms. Satellite and drone based advanced remote sensing technology is feasible and scalable intervention for effective support crop insurance program to reduce vulnerability of farmers to negative impact of climate change.Current implementation of PMFBY heavily relies on Crop Cutting Experiments (CCEs) to determine the yield and yield loss. Remote sensing and crop modeling technology implement by IRRI has the potential to complement delivery of yield loss information and thereby promoting a more reliable claim processing and thus promote better acceptance of the program by farmers. Climate change has increased late season heavy rains and cyclones causing an increasing threat of heavy economic loss from post-harvest inundation. Protocol for loss assessment using complementary information derived using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) can further strengthen information delivery in strict time requirement under extreme weather events including localized events of post-harvest inundation which has a very high damaging threat to the economy of small holds paddy farmers.Disseminating accurate and real-time information on rice area for throughout cropping seasons to state government to facilitate in policy decision making, implementation of insurance products and crop damage management.Color-coded map shows the district-level estimated yield for Kharif-2018 In coastal area of Odisha, abiotic stress such as flood water inundation directly affects the rice productivity. Initial crop establishment in directseeded rice and survival upon submergence in transplanted rice is poor and impacts the productivity. Decoding the spatio-temporal dynamics of coastal flood prone areas through geospatial technology substantially contributes to the productivity enhancement measures.Flood prone zone identification was done using MODIS (Aqua & Terra) 250 m EVI images at 8-day interval for 5 years, (2010-2014). Time series images between end of May to end of October for each year was analyzed to help identify the flood prone zone in each year and subsequently demarcate those areas which were relatively consistent. This work was done for coastal districts of Balasore, Bhadrak, Kendrapara, Jagatsinghpur and Puri. Later for each district, zones were aggregated at block level for necessary intervention.Spatio-temporal dynamics shows that Bhadrak districts was most affected flood prone zone followed by Puri and Kendrapara. Among all the years, 2014 was relatively most affected by flood.Especially between the mid-July to mid-August -and that the water receded only after the last week of August thereby affecting the possible areas of DSR and transplanting.Geospatial technology has the potential to monitor and evaluate the flood zone extent at landscape level, which subsequently can be an important tool for agronomist and policy makers. Moreover, availability of time-series satellite data can substantially support the dynamic decision making at regular interval. With the launch of micro satellites, the tradeoffs between spatial and temporal aspects are reducing. Recent advancement in the technology, e.g. high spatial and temporal resolution satellites such as Sentinel, Planet Lab, is crucial in mitigating risk with persistent and precise monitoring. Drones are facilitating a higher-level of precision in agricultural data by creating an opportunity for real-time monitoring. Another important and emerging aspect of this technology lies in availability of open source data, software and user-friendly toolkits, which can act as a powerful tool for not only the geospatial professional but for people who requires quick area specific or landscape level analysis.Weekly weather mapping using MODISA large portion of potentially productive cropland in Odisha remains fallow during the winter (Rabi) season after the monsoon (Kharif) rice season due to three major factors: (1) lack of irrigation water, mostly in the plateaus and tablelands;(2) stagnant water causing water logging in the coastal low land areas; and (3) high soil or water salinity in the coastal zone. Late harvest of the Kharif crop or excessive soil wetting after rice harvest leads to late planting and low productivity of the Rabi crop. At issue is and major challenge for the state is how to increase productivity and profitability of these agricultural lands. Bringing these fallow lands into cultivation could substantially improve food production and enhance livelihoods of rural communities in this geography. Availability of drought-, flood-, and salt-tolerant rice cultivars and short-duration pulse crops, along with improved agronomy, water management, and mechanization, and technology targeting using GIS and remotesensing, significant numbers of potential ricefallows areas can be brought into cultivation.To intensify cropping in rice-fallow lands by targeting water-efficient crops like pulses, the spatial distribution and extent of the rice-fallow system area need to be mapped. Using improved remote sensing and geospatial technologies, IRRI has carried out mapping of rice fallows (current and permanent fallows) and its spatial-temporal change (by comparing the rice fallows in the year 2006, 2010, 2016, 2017 and 2018) along with the mapping of major associated abiotic stresses (e.g., flood, drought, and salinity) and other reasons for leaving productive lands under fallow (e.g identification of areas having long duration rice cultivars). Residual soil moisture content after rice cultivation is often sufficient in most of the districts to raise short-duration pulses (55-75 days) and oilseed crops. However, a detailed analysis of spatiotemporal profiles of soil moisture availability and duration during the Rabi season was required to precisely target and utilize the short residual soil moisture window (varies from 10-30 days, depending upon land types). IRRI worked to develop extrapolation domain maps of fallows with potential for double cropping by integrating remote sensing and GIS mapping with logical decision tree approach and following it up with on-farm trials and demonstrations of pulses after rice in different locations in Odisha. Extrapolation domain mapping identifies the suitability of rice based cropping systems for targeting improved stress tolerant cultivars, agronomic and water management practices in 'underutilized stress prone rice fallow areas' in Odisha.Integrated analysis of time series remote sensing satellite data of Sentinel-1 (SAR) microwave and Landsat OLI (optical) imageries for the threeyear period 2016-18 revealed that fallow area ranged from 1.97 to 2.20 million ha in Odisha (40 to 45% of the net cropped area), out of which about 1.34 million ha would be considered as permanent rice fallow as revealed by the analysis of frequency of common area for the three mapping years of 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18. Nine among the 30 districts, i.e., Mayurbhanj and Keonjhar district in North-Central plateau, Bargarh and Bolangir district in Western-Central table land, Baleshwar and Bhadrak district in North-Eastern coastal plain, Sundargarh district in North-Western plateau, Kalahandi district in Western undulating zone, and Nawarangpur district in Eastern Ghat highland, account for about 50% of total Rice-Fallow area. Rice-Fallow area is considerably less in the districts situated in the South-Eastern coastal plain.Extrapolation domains using remote sensing and GIS can facilitate precise targeting and accelerate the dissemination of improved technologies in fallow areas in a fast and cost-effective manner:• Rice-fallows and stress prone areas were effectively characterized for the entire state of Odisha• Flood and drought prone areas were mapped for rice varietal targeting at village level • Village wise area and suitability map of potential areas in rice-fallows were made available to facilitate targeting of water efficient suitable short/medium duration crops in rice-fallow systems in Odisha• Improved cropping systems for Rabi and Kharif fallows were tested and recommended• High yielding, short duration and disease resistant pulse varieties were disseminated to farmers along with best-bet agronomy, appropriate varietal selection, and sustainable water resources development through direct intervention• Intensification and diversification is expected to enhance farmer's income with efficient agronomic management practices and land use requirements for various situations• Rice Pulse Monitoring System(RPMS) App has been developed to collect and store georeferenced information, along with a suite of geo-spatial tools to visualize, analyze and manipulate ground data for data management and decision making.• Potential crops for rice fallows could be green gram, black gram, chickpea and mustard, etc. can be grown.• An analysis of the long-term average of spatio-temporal soil moisture profiles can assist in identifying the areas having low, optimum, and excessive soil moisture during the sowing period during Rabi. It also provides the information needed (1) to identify the areas where soil moisture is retained for a shorter or longer period after initial germination, and (2) to determine whether adequate soil moisture can be available up to the pod formation stage of the crop. This information can significantly help to decide the type and duration of the cultivars to use as well as sowing time to target the pulse crop in the rice-fallow cropping system.• ICAR and Ministry of Agriculture, India, to test five different crops in fallow areas targeting (i.e., sweet potato, black gram, green gram, chick pea, and pigeon pea) piloted on field trials in Puri district during Rabi 2018-19, involving other CGIAR organizations including CIP, ICARDA, ICRISAT and IRRI.The scope of advance remote sensing and geospatial analysis based targeting method including extrapolation domains can facilitate precise targeting and accelerated dissemination of improved technologies in fallow areas in fast and cost-effective manner and when combined with thorough cropping systems research, the integrative approach can facilitate increase income of farmers, the ultimate beneficiary of the technology intervention because it allows recommended contextually-relevant improved cropping systems and stress tolerant varieties (STRVs). The approach allows considerable scope to improve the productivity of rice-based systems by adjusting varietal characteristics (e.g. by planting shorter-duration rice, stresstolerant rice, hybrid rice, etc.) and evaluating potential crops for rice-fallows (green gram, black gram, chickpea, mustard etc.) through use of on station experiments and demonstrations in farmers' fields. Managing fallows with a sequence crop, beyond the primary benefits of increased cropping intensity and higher farm returns, also add carbon to the soil, and extract plant available N thereby reducing N2O emissions by preceding rice crops. Odisha is an agrarian state with 70% of the state's population depending on agriculture and allied sector. Even though the quantum of rainfall in Odisha is quite high, its distribution during monsoon period is highly uneven and erratic. As a result, flood and drought occur regularly with varying intensity impacting the production of kharif rice which occupies 67 per cent of the total cropped area and plays a significant role in food security. About 50 per cent of the rice area is established through transplanting methods in Odisha predominantly in rainfed medium or lowland agro-ecology which face problems of erratic rainfall leading to the forced use of weak, older and infested rice seedlings. Delayed transplanting of paddy due to the failure of rain in July affects productivity, as over aged seedlings suffer from low tillering ability. On the other hand, 91 per cent of the farmers have small holding (<1 ha) and can't afford to raise the nursery once it is damaged due to drought/flood. In this scenario, rice nursery enterprise model seems to be an effective solution where a rice nursery entrepreneur takes it as a business to produce healthy rice seedlings in staggered manner and supplies required quantity of healthy seedlings as and when required to farmers at an affordable price. The rice nursery entrepreneur adopts best agronomy practices and this becomes a win-win model for both the entrepreneur and farmers.The lack of resources and quality seed and lack of knowledge in better nursery management in times of monsoon variability demands a source from where farmers can buy healthy seedlings as and when required for transplanting. Staggered mat nursery of paddy with long, medium, and short duration varieties were raised on 15th June (1st nursery), 1st July (2nd nursery) & 15th July (3rd nursery) respectively and supplied to farmers as and when rainfall is enough for transplanting. Hence, farmers transplanted with the right aged seedlings when rainfall is enough for transplanting so farmers saved time and used rainfall effectively. On the other hand, individual rice nursery entrepreneur or SHG developing community nursery earn sufficiently by selling the seedlings in a span of two months. Individual rice nursery entrepreneur and community rice nursery groups developed and promoted in collaboration with various stakeholders like the department of agriculture and KVKs.In this model, rice nursery entrepreneur in consultation with farmers selected the variety, other inputs and management practices and grew it in staggered manner. Farmers availed seedlings from entrepreneurs when their fields got ready and when rainfall was sufficient for crop establishment. In case of extreme climate, staggered nursery raised with quality seeds in trays minimized the damage and able to supply seedling when needed. Due to the volume of business, s(he) or community could be able to minimize the cost and earn good profit.Rice nursery enterprise is a win-win model for both entrepreneur and farmer as it opens seasonal livelihood opportunity for rural youth and women and a strong solution that ensures crop establishment by supplying healthy seedling as and when required at affordable price against critical situation of monsoon variability.It saves money and conserve resources as the entrepreneur follows best management practices to grow healthy seedlings in order to sustain his/ her business.• Increase in Yield: The farmers who used rice seedlings from entrepreneur increased their rice yield by 0.44 t/ha compared to farmers who uses their self-grown nursery with overaged seedlings.• Cost of nursery production: The mat type nursery has less cost for producing rice nursery (INR 2381) for one ha of main field transplanting compared to manual nursery (INR 4762).• Improvement in resource use efficiencies: An entrepreneur uses almost all inputs (land/ seed/fertilizer/water) judiciously because of his technical skill and better-bet management practice.• Increase in net Profit: An average entrepreneur made a profit of INR 15070 in a span of two months in kharif season from selling rice seedlings for 16.09 ha of main field transplanting. Similarly, manual nursery entrepreneur made a profit INR 6300 for selling rice seedlings for 7.85 ha of main field transplanting.• Adaptation & mitigation to climate change risk: Due to nursery enterprises, farmers could be able to establish the crop at right time and no land was left un-transplanted.• Business for enhanced income: By engaging potential individuals particularly youth and women groups through skill development promoted entrepreneurship and contributed to local economy by creating localized service provision in agriculture.Although low land rainfed ecology where monsoon variability is a serious issue; hugely demands such a model, it can succeed at any climate and biophysical conditions. The business model is more beneficial in rice-rice cropping system and this rice nursery model is not only useful for mechanical transplanted rice but also for manually transplanted rice.Due to its low income, rural youth are departing from agriculture in rural areas. On the other hand, women are losing job in agriculture due to mechanization (in transplanting, weeding, harvesting). Hence, the nursery enterprise model has been conceptualized and successfully piloted with youth (individual entrepreneur) and women groups (community nursery) and found successful in Puri, Balasore and Bhadrak districts.If seed, why not seedling! That, if farmers are struggling to get quality seed and raising nursery under high risk, why not they buy readily available healthy seedlings from entrepreneur. This is one of the motivational factor of this model. Moreover, it has been observed that the business model is beneficial to both entrepreneur and the farmer. However, as this is new to the geography, a big push is needed. Government may launch a special scheme with substantial incentivization so that youth and women group will be able to establish seedling factories. To make it more effective and sustainable, this may be linked to mechanical transplanted rice schemes .This module can be operationalized and established through active collaboration with international partners like IRRI, CIMMYT, IFPRI and can be scaled up through Department of Agriculture, KVKs, CBOs .The scheme such as Capital Investment Subsidy for Commercial Agri-Enterprises (CAE) for unit establishments and Farm Mechanization can support this nursery business model. The Govt. has been promoting line transplanting through service provision models and this can be linked with rice nursery business model.Adoption and dissemination of climate resilient rice varieties has emerged as one of the key strategies to tackle the challenges of climate change and making rice farmers in Eastern India more resilient and food secure. However, for sustained adoption of these relatively newer varieties, farmers need sustained access to affordable good quality seeds at the right time. This requires a robust seed system for these resilient varieties which are not yet mainstreamed in the formal public sector channels. Among the various approaches to achieve this, informal and social networks including farmer to farmer dissemination of seed and knowledge could play a significant role. Over the last few decades, women led community-based institutions including self-help groups and their federations have evolved as one of the strong entry points for social and economic change. Building on their capacity, community mobilization skills and wide reach, these institutions can serve as effective platforms for faster dissemination and sustainable production of seed. Their network gives an opportunity for building sustainable adoption and scaling models with a large consumer base to create demand as well as utilize the production. Sahbhagi Dhan (a drought tolerant rice variety) was introduced to the upland areas through these institutions. Being the representative body for several village level women self-help groups and thousands of women farmers; these institutions not only ensured distribution of these seeds among member farmers through seed distribution and reinvestment but also saw other women farmers , especially in the neighbouring villages and communities exchanging these seeds for grains and trying them in their farms. They ensured that every farmer receiving the seeds, multiplied them and returned the same volume to community pool after the harvest. The community institutions ensured those pooled seeds and fresh procured seeds from Department of Agriculture, facilitating NGO or similar projects running in the area are re-distributed among new farmers. Equipped with advanced knowledge and skills, these women members ensured high quality seed production for themselves as well as others. This model, in spite of the lack of any monetary transactions or incentive, was a huge success as exemplified by a rapid dissemination of the variety in region, creating a demand for the seeds year after year.Introduced to less than 1000 farmers in the year 2014-15; the revolving seed production and distribution led to scaling of Sahbhagi Dhan among 2000 additional including new farmers in the next season itself. Apart from the compulsory contribution to community pool many old farmers were also part of informal exchange of seeds with other farmers.The key outcome of this intervention was the creation of capacities in seed production and demand for new varieties. By working with two women led institutions (federations), the knowhow and seeds of the resilient rice reached several thousands of women farmers who are members of these institutions. These member farmers were also found to spread the benefits to non-members within and beyond their villages in form of information and/or seed.Many villages where Sahbhagi Dhan was introduced with few women farmers a few years ago, now have the variety being used in almost all households. Malati, a woman leader from village Jhalkiani of Sampurna Federation says; \"Every household in our village now has either grain or seed of Sahbhagi. Each one of us now consume this variety. If I recall, it was only me and few other members of our group, who had the seeds in 2014\". This indicates the multiplier effect of this intervention.Inspired by the popularity and growing demand of variety, facilitating NGOs (PRADAN) and their collaborators also simultaneously disseminated the variety in many other drought prone districts. This contributed to consolidated demand for this variety growing steadily in the state. Other women federations in nearby Keonjhar district also started asking for these varieties.This momentum gradually helped in continuous circulation of these varieties and entering various formal channels like department of agriculture, zonal outlets of OSSC, dealers, PACS, LAMPS operating in the concerned districts. Spurred by efforts from Department of Agriculture and OSSC, the varietal landscape of the region has been gradually changing. As per primary data from dealers and OSSC growers, the sales of Sahbhagi Dhan only in Jashipur and Karanjia (the operational blocks of the above mentioned women federations) through formal channels has reached 400 quintals (catering 2000 acres) in 2018. This also indicates the potential impact of women's collectives ushering in change through their strong social and informal networks which are trust-based. Several women farmers also reported that they now don't have to exchange farm saved seeds for the variety as they have established seed supply which also ensures the seed quality, seed replacement and diverse seed sources for the community.Apart from reported yield advantages over traditional upland varieties, many women liked the cooking quality, taste, colour of this variety and preferred to store this variety (Sahbhagi Dhan) for home consumption to use as food or in religious/ cultural events.By the year 2017, there were several villages across Jashipur and Karanjia blocks of Mayurbhanj that witnessed introduction of other climate resilient varieties like Bina Dhan 11, DRR 42 etc. through same institutional networks.In some villages like Patbil in Karanjia, women also reported that they faced some resistance within the households when introducing these varieties, but were successful in negotiating and trying these varieties and spreading the word about them in the village. They became proactive in seed sourcing and assessing the quality of the seeds procured for the season. The exposure to new package of practices and extension support through the village level federation of SHGs ensured that women were more confident and involved in varietal selection.The womens' SHG network has proved to be one of the strongest community platforms for introduction, scaling and adoption of technologies, seeds and knowledge. The role of the federations and Village Organizations (VOs) can be further strengthened through access to modern technology, equipment, and knowledge support around large scale seed production programmes for all potential varieties. This can give a significant boost to state level varietal replacement programmes and strengthen seed system of new climate resilient varieties.With existing exposure to book keeping and coordination skills, their business development skills can be enhanced to run commerciallyoriented enterprises around seed and other products. Encouraging more villagers to take up seed production by helping them identify assured markets, aiding the planning and procurement of the materials, assisting the mobilization of resources to establish machinery for processing are a few of the immediate actions that can sustain the interest of these groups in running enterprises.Many trained community resource persons, master trainers, and women farmers from community as individuals or collectives can be linked to the formal seed certification process and registered as growers for public or private seed suppliers.IRRI, CIMMYT, DOA, NRRI, PRADANNational Rural livelihood Mission supported programmes around women farmers' empowerment, MKSP (Mahila Kisan Shashaktikaran Pariyojna); and initiatives by Odisha Livelihood Mission; programmes like Mission Shakti; and Seed Village programmes of Govt. of Odisha are some of the best opportunities to replicate and scale out these models and equip these institutions with skill and resources for spurring further growth and development.Transplanting has remained as a potential establishment method whereas manual transplanting is a common practice. With rising labor crisis and uncertainty in water availability sometimes it is delayed and old seedlings result in yield reduction. Mechanization has come to the rescue under such adversary which saves around 40 labour days on uprooting and transplanting normal seedlings.Farmers adopted this technique and jointly produced seedlings to ensure timely transplanting of correct age seedlings of higher productivity and reduce the risk associated with deficit or delayed onset of monsoon.For mechanical transplanting mat nursery has proved an additional advantage which saves 90% land, 20-25 kg seed as against conventional method which requires 1000 m 2 nursery area and 62-75 kg seed.28 Contribution from S. Biswal, T. Panigrahi, OUAT, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha Impact A community nursery in 5 acres/panchayat and 150 acres in each district was taken up. The subsidy for each nursery given to the farmer is Rs.6500/acre to cover the cost of production and Rs.1000/acre to farmers for purchasing of seedlings for transplanting in 10 acres from 1 acre of nursery. The total amount supported by the department for 1 acre of community nursery worked out to Rs.16,500.State Department of Agriculture has launched a scheme for promoting farmer managed community nurseries under assured irrigation to make paddy seedlings available for transplanting to meet contingent situations. It is suggested to promote community nursery with short duration varieties in the event of deficit rainfall situation / early drought in July as is experienced in several districts .In rainfed ecology where monsoon variability is a serious issue; badly demands such an approach. However it can succeed at any climate and biophysical conditions. The community nursery model is more beneficial in rice-rice cropping Farmers picked up timely nursery and are getting a good crop resultsRice food security is a priority issued for national governments. Shortfalls in production can accentuate food prices, which can in turn impact the government itself. National rice research institutions are responsible for the rice-based systems recommendations for their country.Recommendations for farmers for variety choice for the diversity of ecosystems, for crop management from seed to market and pest management demand credible knowledge and recommendations from scientists and informed extension services. This underpins the public system and this feeds into the institutional knowledge of the diverse actors working for extension of rice knowledge for farmers. In the current scenario, farmers and extension agents are subject to pluralistic extension systems that convey contrasting and conflicting knowledge A key principle in the development of the RKB was single source publishing, which allowed credible content to be used in multiple communication formats. The RKB approach was to enable a collation of rice-based knowledge that was country specific and reflected national agricultural authority. This is then accessible to ICT intermediaries and rural services agencies for using as is, or repackaging for dissemination through to farmers.RKB has over the years developed a systematic approach to working with national partners for the development of their own knowledge bank or a knowledge platform, through workshops and discussion fora. Key components of country knowledge platforms are• Bringing together a wide range of stakeholders from government research and extension institutions and agricultural information services, civil society organizations and as available the private sector• Exercises on priority extension materials to be developed.• Types of communication materials• Capacity building needs of actors in multiple channels• Consistency of messagingThe example of knowledge banks for rice as an example is illustrated with IRRI and the case studies of Bangladesh and the Philippines where processes and knowledge are transferable and scalable for agricultural enterprises beyond rice. The process followed for the knowledge platforms can equally be applied to vegetables, livestock, fisheries and non-rice crops.A credible source of knowledge in a system can serve as a hub within countries for dissemination of the information needed for coherent and rapid out scaling of new technologies. Groundnut is the most promising oilseed crop of Odisha. It covers 2.7 lakhs ha in kharif rabi. Most of rabiareas depends on residual soil moisture. This necessitates early sowing. But seed material available from kharif produce is not sufficient for rabi crop. Hence state depends on seed supply from adjoining states. This is usually delayed and so yield loss is an usual phenomena. Farmers also get exploited by the middle men who supply seeds and in return pick up the entire produce at low price besides charging heavily for seeds, fertilizers and pesticides in terms of interest. Thus timely availability of quality seeds for rabigroundnut that too at a lower price is a great headache for the State Department of Agriculture.The groundnut seeds loses viability when stored in kharif season due to its exposure to high humidity. Storing seeds with CaCl 2 gives prompt and effective germination.Farm women were mostly trained to store seed groundnut using CaCl 2 . As a result farmers could 100 per cent good and bold and perfect quality seeds. This could realize 87 per cent germination and 2.38 t/ha yield as compared to 83 per cent germination and 2.14 t/ha yield with fresh seeds. With an expenditure of Rs 39,243/ha farmers could be benefitted to the tune of Rs. 79,757/ ha. In addition this could free the farmers from bondage with middle men.This technology can be used by each and every groundnut farmer of the state if only CaCl 2 and polybags are made available so that the crop can be sown in time using farmers; own seed that too at a lower price.Groundnut grown in rabi season under stored soil moisture where kharif produce/seed is not available in sufficient quantity (most of costal districts having deltaic alluvium) can be covered under this and early sowing in rabi season can ensure proper and prompt germination.Rural youth, preferably farm women and farmers organisations after expertizing can try this technology in a business mode. They can procure seeds at harvest at a lower price, can store it for the local farmers and sale them at sowing time at reasonable price and can earn huge profit.State department of Agriculture, Odisha State Seed Corporation, women SHGs and farmers' organization and OUAT can work jointly to address this vital issue and solve the crisis.State Govt. need to encourage the farmers to store their own seeds and save lot of money spent on seeds, purchase and transport and also can save lot of precious time at critical period in ensuring seeds availability at farmer door step. Rather a part of this expense can be diverted in providing CaCl 2 and storage bags. Ultimately this can ensure timely sowing and higher productivity and higher return to farmers and to the state. At present the extension personnel in department of agriculture has the major responsibility of transferring technologies to the farming community from time to time. But at this juncture the personnel also have the limitation of transferring field specific crop management practices to the farmers in a user-friendly way.The existing transfer of technology mechanisms and extension programs mostly government run are either slow or ineffective in bridging the linkages between the research community and the farmers. This is partly due to inadequate exploitation of new means of knowledge and information dissemination by these agencies.Using the principles of SSNM, IRRI has developed the Rice Crop Manager (RCM), an application that provides farmers with crop management recommendations tailored to their fields and rice-growing conditions through the internet and text messages. In collaboration with the Government of Odisha, IRRI is investing in developing the capacity of extension workers to ensure the sustainability of the usage of RCM. The extension workers at the block and village-level have been trained through Training of trainers (ToT) programme to operate the tool, interview the farmers and to transfer the crop management advisories to them in a printed one-pager format. Till date around 2800 extension officials have been trained on how to use the RCM app. To re-inforce the advisories, reminders are also sent through voice-calls and text messages to the farmers. As the adage goes \"seeing is believing\", demonstration plots are established and through crop cuts farmers are made aware of the comparative advantage of following RCM recommendation over the conventional practices. In India, women's role in agriculture has been traditionally limited to transplanting, weeding, and similar tasks. Although rural women play a significant role in agriculture, their leverage to influence decision-making for purchasing and applying fertilizer and other inputs in the field remains low. IRRI is working towards creating awareness among women farmers regarding balanced nutrient application, soil health and improved crop management practices by providing them with RCM recommendations and explaining them the advisories. They are also being involved in establishing trials and demonstrations. Several of India's policies and programmes already directly or indirectly address climate change impacts on the agricultural sector covering many of the CSA approach components. However, this is currently being done in anUsing farmers participatory approaches for policy interventions around CSA 32 Contribution from Barun Deb Pal, IFPRI, New Delhi, India uncoordinated manner and are not uniformly spread across the country. For example, NMSA is currently focusing on rainfed areas, whereas climate change vulnerability is also arising in irrigated areas. Given that human and financial resources are scarce it will be more effective and efficient to have a synergized national policy to address climate change in the agricultural sector.This policy will bring about convergence of all ongoing as well as proposed activities at the national and state level related to climate change adaptation and mitigation. It is further proposed that emphasis be laid on considering agriculture as part of a larger landscape to make the system more integrated and sustainable. Such a policy can aid in judicious utilization of natural, physical and financial resources as well as alleviate poverty and food insecurity conditions under climate change and variability.What distinguishes climate smart village from other developmental models is its explicit consideration of climatic risks that are emerging more rapidly and with greater intensity today than in the past coupled with emphasis on addressing adaptation and mitigation challenges. The Climate Smart Village approaches entail higher investments in (i) managing climate risks;(ii) understanding and planning for adaptive transitions that may be needed and iii) exploiting opportunities for reducing or mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, where feasible.According to the Standing Parliament Committee on Agriculture in India, there is already a discerning effect on food grain production due to climate change. Further, Significant negative impacts have been projected with mediumterm (2010-2039) climate change, for example, yield reduction by 4.5 to 9%, depending on the magnitude and distribution of warming (Standing Committee on Agriculture, 2017). Since agriculture makes up roughly 20% of Odisha's GSDP, a 4.5 to 9.0% negative impact on production implies cost of climate change to be roughly between 1 to 2% of GSDP of Odisha per year. Since more than 60 % of people of the state depend directly or indirectly on climate sensitive agriculture sector and concentration of poor is high in rural areas than in urban areas, climate change impacts will increase income inequality in this state. Therefore, transforming agriculture into more adaptive, resilient and sustainable is need of the hour for rural development of Odisha.To achieve this goal Climate Smart Agriculture Village Programme can be an integrative approach to address the interlinked challenges of food security and climate change that aims to:(i) sustainably increasing agricultural productivity, to support equitable increase in farm incomes, food security and development;(ii) adapting and building resilience of agricultural and food security systems to climate change;(iii) and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agricultureBenefits of a village level approach are already being demonstrated through the programme on National Innovation for Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) in 121 villages across the country covering its 11 agro-climatic zones. Also, Climate Smart Agriculture pilot projects are being implemented through the CGIAR research programme that are showcasing successes in making agriculture at village level climate resilient.Keeping in view that the vulnerability level of districts across India will change as the climate warms in short, medium to long term (CRIDA, 2013), the Climate Smart Village Agriculture policy must be dynamic and evolve with the changes across time and space.The starting point to implement this policy will be the Village Agriculture Plan. The program will need to lay special emphasis on developing village level plans for sustaining agriculture production systems, food and livelihood security for all villages that have been classified as, high and highly vulnerable to climate change as per the CRIDA assessment (CRIDA, 2013). Therefore, budgetary provisions need to be made to enable making of these plans. The plans will be guided by an initial climate change vulnerability assessment done using NICRA guidelines on the same. Based on the vulnerabilities assesses the CSA practices will be identified that will be introduced in the villages and corresponding proposals formed. These will be formed by the villagers with scientific inputs from the departments. While considering the best technological practices the plan will enable the following: Odisha experiences frequent drought and flood; its 480 km long coast line is cyclone prone in most part of the crop season. The climate of the Odisha state is hot sub humid with hot summers and mild winters. The farmers are mostly small and marginal groups having low income and so low risk taking ability. Thus the state is greatly affected by the climate change in terms of farm production, income and livelihood. Rice being the major crop of the state, attempts are made to intervene selectively to make the rice based farming system climate smart. Few of such suggestions are detailed below.• Stress tolorent crop varieties( both biotic and abiotic) that can face Challenging weather conditions like drought, flood, cyclones can make farming smart and resilient. A basket of options can widen the resource base under unforeseen exigencies.• Sixty five Per cent rice area is grown rain fed where the sowing/ planting window is quite narrow due to erratic rainfall. Similarly early and quick harvest is required to get rid of cyclonic/ thunder storms at harvest in both kharifand rabi season. But labour crises does not allow it in time. This necessitates mechanisation (transplanter and combine harvester) that can save time as well as the labour cost and can avoid massive crop loss.Establishing custom hiring centers can also create rural employment.• Alternate irrigation system (like AWD) with channel to field irrigation can save water loss, extend crop area and increase crop growth and yield by facilitating root respiration.• Laser land levelling can save water resource by higher distribution efficiency, ensures timely harvest and sowing of successive crop with uniform moisture status.• Resource conserving rice establishment methods (DSR, NPTR) carry better scope in resource scarce farming for climate resilience.• Using solar power for irrigation and other farm processes can avoid dependancy on electricity / fossil fuel in inaccessible areas and for timely farm operation.• Establishing commercial Community paddy nurseries , by individuals or in groups, can supply Right aged seedlings as per the requirement under exigencies and can benefit both the farmers and entrepreneurs.• Real time nutrient management approaches by use of RCM, green seekers etc can effectuate precission agriculture, increase productivity, profitability and sustainability.• Integrated pest and weed management approach can reduce the chemical load, GHG emission , can be cost effective, productive and sustainable.• Conserving crop residues, especially paddy straw, and recycling it can add to soil health; reusing it can add to the income.• Crop diversification from rice-rice system to rice-green gram / ground nut system can save water and other resources, reduce GHG emission, can restore soil health and can render higher profit.• In Odisha, paddy crop is mainly cultivated in kharifseason covering 30.74 lakh hectare (ha). After Kharif paddy, only 18.51 lakh ha is cultivated in rabi, while other 12.2 lakh ha is left as fallow. Growing pulses with heat tolerant varieties can take advantage of the residual moisture stored in the soil with minimum tillage in rice-based system. Processing and value addition can make the approach more remunerative particularly to farm women.• Capacity building for seed storage can ensure timely sowing for effective utilization of resources including residual moisture, can reduce the cost and increase yield and profit.• Smart agro-advisories ensure timely farm operations, can protect the crop and the farmers.• Convergence of various schemes and partner and stake holders can make the mission rapid and fruitful.Currently, the government of Haryana, in collaboration with CIMMYT, is implementing the results of the CSV sites in 500 villages with a focus on resource-conserving machinery and sensors for optimizing fertilizer use and reducing GHG emissions. The governments of Bihar, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, andTelangana have also proposed to finance use of this approach for building resilience in agricultural systems in thousands of villages.The government of Odisha might also seriously consider establishing at least 5 CSV clusters in four regions of the state.Research in the states of Punjab, Haryana, Bihar, Maharashtra, and Telangana has yielded models of CSA portfolios for building resilience that can be adapted for Odisha. Following are thus needed:1. Establish CSV sites as learning platforms for building evidence for CSA. The government of India is taking a similar approach in most states through its National Initiative on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) program.The Compendium seeks to provide an overview of approaches and practical tools to support extension services in the field of climate-smart agriculture.For more information please visit on linkDr ","tokenCount":"21551"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0046865389.json b/data/part_1/0046865389.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..87d914f504ac087107248ed18febaff31973f75a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0046865389.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"a55f4737a0c9aeee67e5284bd8d6c1e2","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/9407014a-64b0-4b34-a640-a261c2e35d8d/retrieve","id":"1326904473"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"8967976f-b7d5-4ed7-922a-d58b6d2e3f0a","pagecount":"11","content":"ISBN 978 94 6022 433 1M aking silage is a good way to feed animals in the dry season in Uganda.The CGIAR Research Program on Livestock and Fish is doing a lot of research on this and is hoping to promote it widely. But will it work somewhere else -in Kenya, say, or Zambia? Doing a set of experimental trials in many locations is expensive and timeconsuming. So scientists try to choose where they target their innovations by looking at aspects like the climate, soils, and socio-economic characteristics such as poverty and market access. Maps can be used to show where a particular technology looks promising.Gender can be a critical influence on the success of a particular intervention. A technology that works well in one place might fail completely in another because of different gender contexts. Stall-feeding, for example, takes a lot of time. It works well if women have sufficient time to collect and chop the feed. It is likely to fail in locations where women already have a high labour burden from their farming and household responsibilities. They will probably prefer to leave their animals out to graze even though this is less productive in terms of milk or meat output.But how to get gender relations and constraints into this targeting? We need a set of maps that show various aspects of gender so we can judge where contexts are similar, and where they differ.To create such maps, we followed four steps:We first decided what types of information to include in the map.1. We selected a large number of variables to reflect this information.2. We built a new set of indicators, or factors, that summarize these variables.3. We created a set of maps showing these factors.We needed a framework that could reflect a whole range of transactions in agricultural value chains. The New Institutional Economics framework (Williamson, 2000) captures four levels: informal institutions, formal institutions, governance and resource allocations. For each of these levels, we identified the corresponding gender concepts. Informal institutions, for example, relate to gender norms such as inheritances being reserved to men (the first column in Table 5.1). We then chose a set of gender indicators to reflect how these gender concepts relate to value chains (the second column in the table ). Women have low decision-making power in their households, earn less than their partners, don't take decisions about money, yet have access to radio and TV. They live in countries that protect them against violence.We wanted to compare across countries and if possible among regions within countries. We needed a large, existing dataset to make this possible. For levels 1 and 2 (formal and informal institutions), we used country-level data from the OECD social institution and gender index (SIGI) database, covering 160 countries. We selected five variables: laws on domestic violence, women's secure access to land, women's secure access to non-land assets, women's access to financial services, and women's access to public space. Each of these variables can take on a score from 0 to 1, where 0 means no discrimination, and 1 means legal discrimination. A score between 0 and 1 depends on experts' opinions on the extent of discrimination through customary law (bringing in the informal institutions).For levels 3 (governance) and 4 (resource allocation), we used data from the Demographic Health Survey (DHS), which covers 90 countries in the developing world. These are individual-level data that cover a wide range of issues: ranging from educational level and access to information to decision-making within the household and ownership of assets. These data come from standardized interviews with a representative samples of women in each region within each country.The OECD data are at a national level, while the DHS data are at an individual level. To use both in the same analysis, we had to make them compatible. We did this by assigning the OECD scores for the country to each individual in the DHS dataset.The third step was to reduce our 20+ variables into a more manageable number. We did this by using factor analysis -a statistical technique that combines variables that are correlated with each other and identifies a set of factors that reflect the underlying meaning of the data.We discovered that the data for countries in Africa and Asia were rather different, so we did separate factor analyses for the two continents. We focus here on Africa. Our analysis identified six factors; Table 5.2 shows these, the variables that contribute to each factor, and how we interpreted each one.To produce maps from the factors, we aggregated the individual-level factors by grouping together women living in the same subnational region. We then plotted these data on a map of Africa. The left-hand map of Figure 5.2 shows that women in Zambia are subject to strong discrimination in terms of laws and customs compared to, say, Uganda. But Zambian women have more decision-making power within their households than do their sisters in Uganda.To return to the question at the start of this section: if we are considering transferring a silage-making technique from Uganda to Zambia, we need to be careful: it may not work because women in Zambia do not own land. On the other hand, it might work because they have more power in their households and may be able to persuade their husbands to try out the new idea.A serious researcher is obviously not going to make decisions just based on a set of such maps. She will also consult with specialists who know the area, look at other datasets and read the literature, before conducting small-scale trials in the new location. But the maps do provide useful information: they give a first indication for possible areas to consider -opportunities -and, they alert the researcher to potential problems. Another choice concerns how to measure indicators and how to treat missing data. An example: a woman's family may not own land because it is too poor. Or the family may own a lot of land, but it is not in the woman's name. In both cases she owns no land, but her situation is clearly different. We need to decide how to deal with this when selecting our variables. For the presented maps, we decided to use women's ownership of land and non-land asset regardless of their family situation, measuring the power a woman has over critical assets needed contribute to the value chain development.All this means that a set of maps may be useful for one purpose but not for another. We can transfer the approach, but may need to generate new maps for different research topics. That may take time and require some recoding of the computer program that generates the maps. Part 1 Gender-integrated methodologies and systems analysisWe have shown it is possible to map gender in a meaningful way and to compare contexts within and between countries. Two issues remain: Do the maps reflect reality on the ground? Validation is often a challenge for global maps. The Livestock and Fish programme has a lot of qualitative data that can be used to validate these maps. More case studies and detailed analysis are needed to understand better how accurate and useful the current maps are.What is the added value of gender context maps for targeting? The maps have not yet been tested for targeting research or development activities. We do not yet have any evidence that they will be useful. We need to test them in targeting actual research activities and seeing if they provide any new recommendations. If they do -and if the recommendations are valid -then we can be confident that we have created a useful product.The project speaks to the gender integrated research agenda because the gender maps can be used to identify the gender characteristics of contexts to interventions. Gender characteristics are considered an important aspect of contexts that affect the uptake of technological and institutional innovations and solutions. Identifying these factors, and also identifying how contexts correspond or differ from other contexts on gender characteristics is helpful to see which innovations can be scaled out where, and what gender considerations merit consideration in implementing these innovations.In terms of gender integration, this project:• Uses sex-disaggregated data, and especially data in existing datasets that is collected from women ","tokenCount":"1373"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0054743375.json b/data/part_1/0054743375.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b1bd3e5680f45eeae8ec772c19e92dd6285c22ff --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0054743375.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f77b550e78d328d802af9fd5bb34ec13","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/b7814d19-5845-4043-86d1-59451512deb6/retrieve","id":"170761710"},"keywords":["agricultural incentives","GHG","nominal rate of assistance","nominal rate of protection","value chain JEL codes: Q11","055","L1"],"sieverID":"a43e50fc-215a-446e-aa64-1991d86cca42","pagecount":"87","content":"in 1975, provides research-based policy solutions to sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition. IFPRI's strategic research aims to foster a climate-resilient and sustainable food supply; promote healthy diets and nutrition for all; build inclusive and efficient markets, trade systems, and food industries; transform agricultural and rural economies; and strengthen institutions and governance. Gender is integrated in all the Institute's work. Partnerships, communications, capacity strengthening, and data and knowledge management are essential components to translate IFPRI's research from action to impact. The Institute's regional and country programs play a critical role in responding to demand for food policy research and in delivering holistic support for countryled development. IFPRI collaborates with partners around the world.Establishing an Agricultural Incentives database was the key element of this research program. This allowed us to bring together and harmonize data collected by four key international organizations-FAO, the Inter-American Development Bank, the OECD and the World Bank-and to make them widely available on a dedicated website hosted by IFPRI. Doing so increased the geographic coverage of data from 27 country/regions (including the EU) covered by the OECD to 62 country/regions, including many where agricultural support measures strongly affect poverty.The Ag-incentives data are important both in their own right and as a platform for further research by both IFPRI team members and external researchers. Because the Ag-Incentives data are compatible with the now-dated collection of data from the World Bank's Distortions to AgriculturalIncentives database, they have allowed construction of consistent data series from 1981 to 2020 in recent work and could potentially allow extension of the data back to 1955 in some cases. These long data series are particularly important because the pattern of agricultural support changes as countries develop, with countries typically moving from taxing agriculture in developing and under-developed countries to supporting it in developed countries. The new, extended data series include both support from subsidies as well as from market price support provided by trade distortions, allowing us to provide a much more complete picture of support as richer countries tend to provide much more of their support through subsidies than developing and under-developed countries.Within the IFPRI team, the Ag Incentives data provided a basis for a wide range of research on key topics. An important series of PIM supported studies focused on agricultural incentives and value chain development. These studies examined value chains in Ethiopia, India, Nigeria and Tanzania,showcasing the importance of the overall policy framework for key commodities. A related set of studies used gender-differentiated protection indicators to assess impacts on women.Another important strand of work under this theme is on the critical topic of repurposing agricultural support. While there are major concerns about the adverse impacts of current support, there appear to be few concrete plans for reform in a way that will address these concerns. Recent IFPRI-World Bank work has revealed various simpler approaches to reform widely advocated policies-such as removing support from livestock, making support uniform across commodities, or abolishing all support-would not generate the transformational reductions in emissions needed to limit global warming. Another popular approach to reform-by using conditionality to induce farmers to produce with lower emissions-faces the limitation that by lowering productivity, it is likely to require an increase in agricultural land use, and hence emissions from land use change. This research shows that a much deeperAgricultural policy measures affect commodities at farm as well as the entire agri-food value chain of a commodity. These impacts are important as farmers in developing countries have increasingly become more market oriented, with smallholder farmers selling substantial shares of their farm output (Rapsomanikis, 2015) and relying on markets, both to generate income and to meet food needs (Sibhatu and Qaim, 2017). To understand the full implications of agricultural policies, it is necessary to correctly measure the extent to which policies distort market prices of commodities along the value chain, and to understand the implications of protection provided to other sectors, protection that affects agricultural incentives indirectly both through impacts on prices of intermediates and through real exchange rate impacts.The functioning and performance of agricultural value chains are particularly important for the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in developing countries. In developing countries, especially in lowermiddle income countries, agriculture provides an important share of employment and a smaller, but still important, share of GDP. To support development and to respond to political-economy pressures, governments often intervene with trade policies or price support for specific agricultural commodities or products.In addition to domestic value chains, global value chains are growing in importance. Bulk agricultural products account for under a quarter of global agricultural trade, with processed, semiprocessed products and horticultural products accounting for the remaining 75 percent. In Africa, horticultural products, involving complex supply chains, accounted for 22 percent of agricultural exports and processed and semi-processed products 43 percent (Fukase and Martin, 2018).In this Discussion Paper, we draw lessons from various studies that were supported by CGIAR Policies, Institutions and Markets (PIM) program on agricultural incentives, including i) the links between agricultural incentives and value chain development, and ii) links between agricultural incentives and environmental outcomes.The first objective of this Report is to place the global Ag-Incentives database and other studies that rely on it into a broader perspective of agricultural and value chain development. The Report links this work to the ongoing discussions on repurposing of agricultural support. We also discuss achievements of the Ag-Incentives Consortium through multi-institutional collaboration among key stakeholders, such as policy makers, researchers, and market participants. We also point out the important role of this initiative as a foundation for many other studies that contribute to the positive changes sought by PIM.One of the most critical contributions of the studies supported by PIM is to highlight the necessity to look beyond impacts at the single node of an agricultural value chain. Thus, the second objective of this Discussion Paper is to highlight the contributions of studies that link agricultural policy analysis to value chain analysis. This will include discussion of studies that build on the Ag-Incentives framework and value chain analysis. These include studies of repurposing agricultural incentives to achieve environmental goals; studies of the process of transformation as economies develop; and studies that examine ways to combine multiple interventions to address multiple goals.We discuss in some depth methodological contributions to the literature on linking nominal rate of protection (NRP) analysis to value chain analysis. For this, we draw from a study on Indian value chains, which proposed a new methodology to extend the NRP approach that is estimated for commodities to a value chain framework. Second, we will discuss NRPs and policy impacts along value chains in three developing countries: small ruminants in Ethiopia, palm oil and cacao in Nigeria, and maize and groundnuts in Tanzania. Finally, we will discuss gender dimensions of agricultural policy and its impact by drawing from gender-differentiated NRP indicators computed for Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.The third objective of this Discussion Paper is to propose a framework which enables further scientific use of the Ag-Incentives database and the underlying methodology for research and policy analysis. This is intended to help future researchers move beyond policy measurement to other research topics such as meta-analyses of distortions and disincentives. This section of the report discusses the organization and achievements of the Ag-Incentives Consortium whose data are fundamental to analysis of the impacts of agricultural support on value chains. It also examines a series of studies that use this work to investigate key questions such as the impacts of changes in support on global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.Many governments intervene in agricultural markets to accomplish a variety of goals, such as keeping food prices low for consumers, raising farm incomes, and/or reducing food price volatility. These policies may generate overlapping and opposing outcomes along the agricultural value chain, by protecting one part of the value chain and taxing another. Policy interventions, particularly those in large countries, can also have large impacts on world prices of commodities. In this context, it is important to have continuous and accurate measurement of agricultural incentives for a wide range of agricultural commodities.Frequently, the means used to provide protection or taxation of agriculture are non-transparent, making it difficult for participants in policy debates-especially those in partner countries-even to be confident whether agriculture is being protected or taxed. Continuous monitoring and measurement of agricultural incentives in many countries helps provide timely information on impacts both on key stakeholder groups, such as the poor, within countries and on world markets. Reliable information helps governments make necessary policy adjustments in response to a wide range of shocks.To provide an agreed database on agricultural incentive measures within the group of rich industrial countries, the OECD has been preparing standardized estimates of agricultural incentive measures since the 1980s. Over time, the coverage of this effort has been extended to include some of the developing countries with the largest impacts on world markets. Two major one-off studies from the World Bank provided measures of these distortions for a range of developing countries. The seminal Krueger, Schiff and Valdés (1988) study covered 18 countries while the Anderson (2009) study covered a total of 75 countries, with around 40 developing countries in addition to the high-income countries covered by OECD. In terms of institutional efforts, OECD annually updates the Producer Support Estimate (PSE) database for OECD countries and selected emerging economies (see OECD 2020). The IDB's Agrimonitor program 1 uses the OECD methodology and covers close to twenty countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. FAO-MAFAP publishes similar estimates for 15 countries, mostly in Africa (Pernechele, Balié, and Ghins, 2018). Results from studies of agricultural incentives in South Asia initiated by the World Bank are also included in the database (Ejaz and Ahmed, 2017;Weerahewa, 2017).The wide scope of databases with slightly different methodologies and terminology makes it difficult for stakeholders to interpret the impacts of policies on market incentives for the countries applying the measures, for their trading partners, and for world market outcomes. A comprehensive and long-term database helps analysts and policy makers to compare and interpret the impacts of policies across commodities, countries, and over time, while avoiding duplication of effort. To measure agricultural incentives, different methodologies are used in the literature. These methodologies fall into two categories: (i) direct measurement of policies, and (ii) inferring the stance of policy by examining the impacts of policies on the gaps between prices. Direct measurement of policies works well if the policies are transparent measures such as tariffs, whose impact can be specified with a summary measure such as a percentage rate. Unfortunately, many agricultural price distortions arise from measures such as product licenses, import quotas, tariff-rate-quotas, or export bans. Sometimes multiple measures apply to the same product either at one time or at different points in time. To deal with the problems of multiple instruments, and the non-transparent impacts of quantitative restrictions, the main approach to measuring agricultural distortions (since Josling, 1973) has been to estimate the combined impact of all relevant measures using the gap between the internal and external prices of the good.Dividing this price gap by the external reference price converts it into a nominal rate of protection (NRP)that is comparable to an ad valorem tariff. For this measure to be a valid representation of the effects of policies, great care must be taken to ensure that the products outside and inside the country are comparable in terms of quality, location, and other key product attributes at a point of competition between domestic and traded goods.Once this NRP has been calculated, it can be converted-by adjusting for transport and other costs-into an estimate of the impact of distortions on prices at other points in the value chain, such as at the farmgate. The impacts of domestic support measures such as output or input subsidies can also be added to it to obtain a total measure of the impact on incentives.To capture the net effect of policies, the NRP measures the impact of policies on domestic prices relative to the reference prices that would have applied had there been no interventions.The NRP methodology is based on the law of one price, which requires that the domestic and the border prices refer to comparable commodities. A reference price at the farmgate is computed and used to estimate the NRP by comparing it with the farmgate price that is distorted. This price difference, expressed as a percentage, is the NRP. Positive NRPs indicate that producers receive prices above prevailing international prices, meaning that policies have subsidized the producers. Negative NRPs indicate that producers receive prices below international prices, meaning policies have taxed producers.An estimate of the monetary value of market price support (MPS), is also provided in the Ag-Incentives database. MPS is computed as:Another important indicator used in the literature is the Nominal Rate of Assistance (NRA). The NRA is an extension of the NRP that includes policies such as subsidies (spending) to inputs and outputs in addition to the price gap measured by the NRP. The total NRA to farm output can be decomposed into support provided by border price support (the NRP), support provided by domestic policies such as subsidies on outputs and inputs, which, when summed together, generate the total NRA. The total NRA may be decomposed into support to inputs and to output.The Where only market price support is provided, or only market price support is being considered, equations (4) and ( 5) can be used to compare the PSE and the NRP.The PSE-type measures have a useful interpretation as the share of producer income that is provided by the distortions under consideration. The NRP/NRA measures have a useful interpretation as the tariff rate that would be equivalent to the measures applying to the commodity. For small rates of intervention, the two measures are similar, with a 5 percent NRP translating into a PSE of 4.76 percent.However, for large rates of distortion, the gap between the two becomes quite large, with a 50 percent NRP translating into a PSE of 33 percent. Both these measures are useful, although for different questions, and it is important to recall that they can readily be inter-converted.The Effective Rate of Protection (\uD835\uDC43\uD835\uDC43\uD835\uDC41\uD835\uDC41\uD835\uDC41\uD835\uDC41), introduced by Corden (1966) and Balassa (1965), is an indicator for analyzing the impacts of trade distortions on value added at different points in the value chain. Corden (1966) defines the \uD835\uDC43\uD835\uDC43\uD835\uDC41\uD835\uDC41\uD835\uDC41\uD835\uDC41 as the percentage increase in domestic value added per unit in an economic activity due to current tariff structure relative to a situation in absence of tariffs. This measure is particularly important for activities that involve substantial use of intermediate inputs, such as processing activities and manufacturing, where differences between protection to inputs and outputs may make it difficult to be sure whether an activity is, on balance, protected or taxed, and where the incentive or disincentives to output from seemingly modest rates of intervention may be very large. Calculation of ERPs requires information on the NRPs for both inputs and outputs. This measure is rarely used for agriculture but is very important for manufacturing sectors where intermediate inputs are generally a larger share of output value and many intermediate commodity prices may be distorted.The global Ag-Incentives database provides an NRP indicator, using a consistent methodology, drawing on all the available IO databases. Based on this harmonization and consolidation effort, the Ag-Incentives website was launched in 2017 to release the harmonized database. The audience for the website is many stakeholders, including journalists, academics, policy makers, researchers and nongovernment organizations (NGOs). By drawing together comparable data, the Ag-Incentives database can be used to analyze the impact of agricultural policies on the welfare of farmers and consumers globally.Nominal Rate of Assistance (NRA) measures that include both the market price support represented in the NRP and other support measures such as subsidies to output, input and factors have been computed and are scheduled for release in 2022. Major work has also been undertaken to extend the duration of many NRP series back to the mid-1950s by harmonizing the data in the Ag-Incentives database with the time series from 1955 to 2005 generated by the Anderson (2009) Distortions to Agricultural Incentives project at the World Bank.Table 1 shows the country and commodity coverage of NRPs in the database as of late 2021.There is some overlap across geographical and sector coverage across IO databases. Thus, the Consortium maintains the mandate and the independence of each IO, while creating a collaborative approach and recognizing Intellectual Property Rights. To understand the full implications of agricultural policies, it is necessary to correctly measure and interpret policy distortions to agricultural incentives. In this section, we will provide a brief survey of these interventions in global agricultural markets by systematically reviewing estimates of policy induced distortions to agricultural incentives. We use the Ag-Incentives Consortium 2 database to assess these policy distortions. The database combines data from multiple International Organizations (IO) and uses the NRP methodology based on data from each of the IOs. One useful perspective is provided by comparison of the weighted average NRP for the agricultural sector globally with global food price indices such as the FAO Food Price index. Figure 2 shows that the average protection rate responded strongly to the food price crisis of 2008 and 2011. In both years, world food prices increased, and average NRPs decreased substantially as governments sought to insulate consumers from higher global market prices.While this insulation approach might appear to each individual country to make sense -taking the changes in world prices as given -these reductions in protection increase the demand for food within the insulating countries and reduce the incentive to produce. This, in turn, raises world prices, reducing the effectiveness of each country's attempt to stabilize its domestic prices (Anderson, Ivanic, and Martin, 2014). Martin and Anderson (2012) offer an analogy with the situation where every member of a crowd rises in a stadium to get a better view of the game-thereby wiping out the improvement in view that they all seek.Anderson, Martin and Ivanic (2017) offer another analogy by noting that that, if all countries reduced their protection by the same amount -such as the observed average decline in protection -the increase in the world price would completely offset the reduction in their protection, causing their domestic prices to rise in line with the original increase in world prices, and rendering their interventions collectively ineffective. However, countries differ in the extent to which they try to offset the impact of higher world prices. In this context, the only way that an individual country can effectively stabilize its domestic price is by reducing its protection by more than the average. Clearly, however, not all countries Oilseeds and products Other TOTAL can reduce their protection by more than the average amount, any more than all children in a class can be above average.A further possibility is that countries may focus on food availability, as argued by Sen (1981), likely at least in part because of confusion between food self-sufficiency and food security. This results in NRPs that depend on the volume of domestic production, with poor harvests resulting in higher rates of protection, and good harvests in low rates of protection, with price stabilization efforts frequently resulting in greater price instability (Jayne 2012, p144). If elasticities of demand for food are near unity, this may stabilize farm incomes, while destabilizing consumer costs (Newbery and Stiglitz 1984). If elasticities of demand for food are less than unity, as seems likely, such a policy will destabilize both producer revenues and consumer costs. Koo, Mamun and Martin (2021) analyze a case where food policies based on availability exacerbate the costs of adverse output shocks to farmers who are net sellers, and increase poverty. This type of policy is perhaps worse than price insulation in that it destabilizes both domestic prices and -by blocking the country's responses to changes in world prices -world prices as well.Analysis aimed at assessing the effectiveness of agricultural trade policies requires information on agricultural protection rates over time. This is the case whether the objective is to assess the effectiveness of an individual, small country's policies in stabilizing domestic prices; to assess the effectiveness countries' collective action on the stability of world prices (Ivanic and Martin 2014) or the impacts of food self-sufficiency policies on both domestic and external price instability. The Ag Incentives database provides essential information for analyzing the impacts of current food price policies and for designing and testing the impacts of improved policies. In the next step, let's look at trends of agricultural incentives across different agricultural products. High Income countries protect their Animal products sector over the study period at high rates, whereas Middle Income countries increase their protection from negligible amounts in 2005 to 10% in 2018 (Figure 4). Low Income countries, on the other hand, tax the Animal products sector at very high rates, with considerable volatility seen in the negative NRP values. Oilseeds show quite high variation, although some of this volatility may reflect changes in the countries included in this relatively small sample of countries where estimates of support to oilseeds are available.To the extent that these fluctuations in NRPs reflect actual changes in protection, they raise important policy questions for which the Ag Incentives data permit thorough analysis. When we compare NRPs for the agricultural sector across regions in Figure 7, we see the high taxation rate in Africa, although this rate of taxation has declined over time. This is partly due to governments in the region following cheap food policies for products such as maize and partly due to export taxation on cash crops such as coffee and tea being an important source of government revenue.Europe's protection of agriculture declines over the period, whereas Asia's protection rate first decreases and then increases. Northern America has low but consistently positive NRP. The Latin America and Caribbean region oscillates between protection and taxation, but at low average rates. The NRP series averages 10 percent over the study period, while the NRA averages 16.8 percent.This gap roughly matches the 6.4 to 9.3 percent ratio seen in the first period and the 15 to 21 percent ratio seen at the end. However, this gap varied considerably during the period. In 1973-74, it appears that direct support to farmers declined considerably-perhaps because policy makers felt that farmers needed less support in this period of very high prices. The gap widened considerably between 1980 and 1984, as governments increased their direct support to farmers while the NRP remained low. These relationships between the NRP and the NRA point to complex dynamics of the type considered by Ivanic and Martin (2014) between domestic and world market prices.An important step is to have measures of agricultural incentives over an extended period. This is because the rate and form of protection frequently change as countries develop (Anderson 1995). Key 1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016 NRA NRP domestic subsidies and show, for instance, the dramatic decline in the reliance of the European Union on market price support between 1988 and 2007. They also show the dramatic turnaround in China from taxing agriculture in the early 1980s to an average of around 20 percent support after 2012.The Ag Incentives consortium itself provides important information for policy makers. But perhaps its most important contributions to PIM goals arise from the research that builds on it. Measures of the direct impacts of agricultural policies are important both in their own right and as inputs into model-based analysis examining the implications of policy reform. In recent years, a key policy issue has been the implications of repurposing agricultural support to improve both economic and environmental outcomes. The first study considered (Mamun, Martin, and Tokgoz, 2021) examines whether agricultural incentives are biased towards emission-intensive products. The second study, Laborde et al. (2021), examines the implications of repurposing agricultural incentives on emissions from production, while a third study by Gautam et al. (2022) examines the implications of reform taking into account emissions from both production and land use change. All of these studies deal with situations where policy makers have multiple objectives. To examine this problem in more detail, we turn to a study by Martin, Ivanic, and Mamun (2022) of policy formulation when policymakers have multiple objectives, such as economic efficiency and environmental outcomes or economic growth and poverty reduction.Agricultural production and land use change contributed to nearly 20 percent of GHG emissions globally in 2017 (FAOSTAT, 2021), the second largest contributor as a sector. Since agriculture and land use change are important sources of GHG emissions, it is crucial to address this issue if any meaningful contribution to addressing climate change is to be achieved. Thus, the environmental implications of agricultural production and agricultural policy framework are important in the climate change debate.If agricultural support is directed at commodities that are emission intensive, agricultural support might indirectly increase emissions by increasing the output of these commodities. Especially subsidies that have a direct positive impact on production would increase GHG emissions if given to commodities with higher emission intensities relative to the other countries producing the same commodity. For example, if rice production has higher GHG emissions per kg of output in Country A than in Country B, and if County A provides coupled subsidies to rice farmers, the impact on global GHG emissions is likely to be positive. Mamun, Martin, Tokgoz (2021) utilize the OECD PSE (2018) database and Tubiello (2019) to compare emission intensities of agricultural commodities and agricultural support for these commodities, grouped into OECD countries (mostly developed countries) and non-OECD countries (emerging economies). These two groups of countries differ widely in terms of support levels and support types as discussed in section 2.1 above. A particular challenge in designing policies to reduce emissions from agriculture arises because most of them are \"process\" emissions that do not respond directly to changes in incentives. This difference from emissions arising from combustion of fuels means that price policies do not affect the choice of production technique in the way that a carbon tax brings about substitution between fuels and reductions in fuel use per unit of output. In this situation, changes in agricultural support levels can influence emissions only by changing output levels.What matters for commodity output levels is primarily the extent to which support changes the incentive to produce particular outputs. While relatively commodity-neutral incentives such as fertilizer or capital subsidies affect overall agricultural output, the elasticities of aggregate agricultural supply response are generally low relative to those for individual commodities-where output can be changed both by augmenting inputs and by transferring land between activities. For this reason, the authors focus on agricultural support that can be associated with particular commodities, captured in the Single Commodity Transfer (SCT), which includes MPS for that commodity and that part of budget support (such as output subsidies) that can be identified with the particular commodity. It therefore excludes support such as fertilizer or other input subsidies that cannot generally be allocated to production of a specific commodity.Figure 9 below shows this commodity-specific support as a percentage of the value of production at reference prices in OECD and non-OECD countries using data from the OECD PSE database (2018).The highest support rate is for rice, followed by sugar, and beef and veal for OECD countries. For non-OECD countries, rapeseed, rice, sugar, and wheat have high rates of support. In both groups, there is wide variation in support rates across commodities. based on their methodology now available at FAOSTAT (Tubiello, 2019). Table 3 below presents average emission intensity by commodity and emission shares by commodity for OECD and non-OECD country groups in 2015. An important feature is the high emission intensity of ruminant meat in both OECD and non-OECD countries. There are significant differences in emission intensities between OECD and non-OECD countries: the emission intensity is twice as high in non-OECD countries for beef and veal; and more than twice as high in non-OECD countries for milk. When border measures in OECD countries increases output of beef and veal in OECD countries, there is an adverse output effect on emissions in the rich countries, but the associated reduction in global demand helps lower world prices and hence reduce the incentive to produce the good.Figure 9 above shows that beef and veal received approximately 18 percent support in OECD countries and 8 percent in non-OECD countries. Other livestock commodities, such as pig meat, also have higher emission intensity relative to other commodities in both groups of countries. Pig meat receives 11 percent support in OECD and 12 percent support in non-OECD countries. Another feature is the higher emission intensity of rice in OECD and non-OECD group relative to \"other cereals\".To the extent that market price support in OECD countries stimulates output in those countries while depressing output in other countries, it is important to examine differences in the emission intensity of production in each region. When we look at the share of emissions coming from specific agricultural commodities, ruminant meats contribute nearly half of emissions (Table 3) in both OECD and non-OECD countries. Milk has the same share of GHG emissions in both country groups, approximately 18 percent.One striking difference is the much higher share of rice in GHG emissions in non-OECD countries relative to OECD countries. Figure 9 shows that in OECD countries, support for rice is around 113 percent and in non-OECD countries it is around 33 percent. The share of emissions from rice production is about five times higher in non-OECD countries than in OECD countries. Considering the gaps in emission intensities between two groups of countries, one question to ask is what would happen if developing countries produced and consumed higher shares of milk and bovine meat, like OECD countries, but with the same emission intensity they currently have. Mamun, Martin, Tokgoz (2021) compute that the total emissions from current OECD output mix with the current emission intensities of non-OECD countries would increase total emissions from developing countries by 78 percent. With increasing incomes in developing countries, this answer generates concerns about the future of GHG emissions from agriculture. It should be noted that we are not considering trade, such as the import of dairy and livestock products by developing countries with high emission intensities from developed countries with low emission intensities.Emission intensities are not constant over time but tend to decline with improvements in productivity. Developing countries tend to have greater potential to increase productivity since they are further away from their production possibility frontier. Mamun, Martin, Tokgoz (2021) compute annual changes in emission intensity by commodity for both country groups (Table 4). For both country groups emission intensities are declining over time. Furthermore, for almost all commodities, emission intensities are declining faster in developing countries. A key question is whether the current structure of agricultural support is GHG unfriendly or not, i.e., \"does the current support encourage output of emission-intensive commodities relative to others?\" Mamun, Martin, Tokgoz (2021) attempt to answer this question by comparing rate of support for these commodities relative to other commodities. They compute this ratio as:where \uD835\uDC60\uD835\uDC60 \uD835\uDC39\uD835\uDC39\uD835\uDC43\uD835\uDC43 is the proportional support rate on emission intensive commodities (ruminant meats, milk, rice, other cereals, pig meat, poultry meat, eggs) and \uD835\uDC60\uD835\uDC60 \uD835\uDC43\uD835\uDC43 is the support rate on other commodities. We see that in the early 1990's, globally the direct impact of agricultural incentives favored lower emission-intensive goods, with the ratio being only 0.85. For OECD countries, we observe the same, i.e. the ratio is below 1 in the study period, with variation over time, and ending at 0.90. In non-OECD countries, the ratio increases starting in 2007, and reaching above 1 over time. This shows that agricultural support in non-OECD countries has changed, favoring output of emission-intensive goods relative to others. One thing to note in this discussion is the nature of support. The trend of the ratio for non-OECD countries may overestimate the full impact on GHG emissions since most of the support was through MPS that raised consumer prices. Higher prices likely have reduced demand for those goods in countries with trade barriers while they reduced output in countries without such protection and facing depressed world prices.Countries spend significant resources on agricultural subsidies every year; the 51 countries covered by OECD's agricultural policy monitoring provided $483 billion per year in subsidies to farmers in 2015-17. At the same time, the effectiveness of this support has been in question for decades. The Ag-Incentives Consortium, supported by PIM, has played a critical role in this debate. It has brought together the findings from the organizations active in this field in order to develop a global view of agricultural incentives. Through this work, CGIAR PIM has contributed to better measurement of how agricultural policies are influencing market prices and incentives.The work of the Ag-Incentives Consortium is crucial since agricultural incentives change over time due to changes in policy environment and movements of agricultural prices in world markets.Regular estimation and analysis of agricultural incentives is necessary for meaningful discussion of policy reform. At the same time, the joint of impact of countries' policies influences the level of world prices. Thus, a meaningful policy reform debate needs to consider not only the country's own policy space, but also the impact of policies of countries with large share of the world trade and production. This policy reform debate is especially important due to ongoing debate on the impact of agricultural policy on environmental outcomes, especially GHG emissions.Countries allocate significant financial resources to agricultural resources. These resources are allocated either as coupled subsidies (direct subsidies on output or as subsidies on inputs that create incentives to increase output of specific goods) or as decoupled subsidies (that avoid altering incentives to change output levels but provide direct income support to farmers). Countries also support farmers through other policies such as trade or border measures (tariffs, licenses, or quotas that provide MPS by raising the domestic price relative to world price).In addition to the support measures discussed above, governments also attempt to improve the enabling environment for agriculture, by providing public goods, such as research and development and rural infrastructure. Governments also intervene in many ways that indirectly affect agriculture, such as by imposing mandates for use of biofuels and improving the poor people's access to food through social safety net programs.At the same time, the effectiveness of this agricultural support has been in doubt for decades. One study (supported by the FOLU Coalition) that relied on the Ag-Incentives database discussed the reform of agricultural support for improving environmental outcomes in developed and developing countries (Mamun, Martin, Tokgoz, 2021). The following discussion is based on the findings of Mamun, Martin, Tokgoz (2021).If we evaluate agricultural support policies based on how much they distort trade, market price support is the most distorting followed by coupled subsidies, and decoupled subsidies being the least distorting. If we evaluate agricultural support policies in the context of environmental impact, the ranking is different. Any given amount of support provided to producers by market access barriers has, other things equal, a smaller impact on global output and emissions than the same amount of support provided by subsidies. This is because the market price support, while increasing the incentive to produce in the part of the world receiving subsidies, reduces global demand for the product by raising its cost to consumers.Differences in emission intensities across regions also influence the outcome. For example, reduction of MPS in a developed country with low emission intensity may shift production to developing countries that have higher emissions per unit of output and thus increase overall GHG emissions.Emissions from agriculture and land use change have contributed to an increase in GHG emissions over the years (Tokgoz and Laborde. 2014). Thus, the impact of agricultural support on agricultural production is crucial in climate change debate as well. Any re-purposing debate of agricultural support needs to consider both the trade impact and the environmental impact (GHG emissions, water use, etc.).When discussing re-purposing of agricultural support, it is crucial to evaluate the financial burden. Agricultural support such as coupled and decoupled subsidies need to be funded directly, and thus they are under greater scrutiny. Measures directed towards market price support do not need to be funded and thus avoid this scrutiny. This makes trade and border measures appealing to importing countries that obtain tariff revenues or exporting countries that benefit from export tax as government revenue.When evaluating future of agricultural support, we begin the discussion with a brief review of recent trends. Agricultural support has been transformed in both developed and developing countries over the last decades. In High Income countries, there has been a strong move to decoupled subsidies away from MPS and coupled subsidies, as seen in the decline in average NRPs of High-Income countries in Another form of agricultural support is spending on activities such as agricultural research and development and rural infrastructure. Agricultural R&D has been effective in increasing productivity in both developing and developed countries (Alston, et al., 2020). The OECD PSE database shows that for OECD and non-OECD countries, investment in these public goods is a relatively small share of total support. In the OECD countries, they average around 12 percent of total support (OECD, 2018), with the largest allocations going to infrastructure and research and knowledge generation. In the non-OECD countries, this type of support averaged around 16 percent of total support, with the largest amount spent on public stockholding and most of the remainder on infrastructure and knowledge generation.There are many paths to increasing productivity, such as use of more productive inputs, investments in mechanization and irrigation, better land management, agricultural R&D, and increases in cropping intensity (Laborde, et al. 2016;Poudel et al. 2012;ERS 2011). Governments can invest in these channels, especially research and development where the returns per dollar spent are likely $10 or more (Alston, 2018).Although agricultural support has been changing over time both in terms of form and spending amount, there are still calls for agricultural policy reform due to the challenges being faced globally: climate change, poverty, and nutritional issues. However, whether nationally or globally, any reform of agricultural support will face challenges since current beneficiaries would be the most vocal to oppose reform. To be successful, reformers need to make a careful strategic decision about the breadth of the policy agenda, including measures that would generate benefits to key interest groups. Incentive Program in the USA (Engel and Muller, 2015).A major limitation of these approaches is that they likely reduce productivity as well as emissions. While proponents of particular approaches to reducing emissions -such as organic farmingfrequently argue that their favored approach is more productive than technologies in current use, the need for conditionality to induce use of this approach suggests that producers are not convinced. Literature surveys of productivity in organic farming, for instance, suggest to a non-trivial loss in productivity associated with its use (Ponisio et al. 2014;Seurfert, Ramankutty, and Foley 2014). If farmers are induced to use less productive approaches by conditionality, this will lower the productivity of agriculture and require additional agricultural land use. Gautam et al. (2022) conclude that this approach can, on net, reduce emissions, despite the increase in emissions associated with increased agricultural land use, but that this comes at substantial costs in terms of national income, farm income and higher costs of healthy foods to consumers.The Gautam et al. (2022) study built a new database of agricultural support drawing on all the information in the Ag-Incentives database and selected additional information, such as estimates of domestic support based on the literature. Importantly, it also added emissions from land use change, to get a more comprehensive assessment of the impacts of changes in emissions from reform of support policies.It concluded that the most promising approach to achieving both economic and sustainability goals appears to be to invest in R&D designed to both reduce emissions and raise productivity. Approaches of this type have a double environmental dividend-reducing both emissions from production and emissions from land use change. They also raise national income and lower the costs of health diets. It is desirable that they be accompanied by programs to increase the mobility of labor out of agriculture to avoid depressing returns to agricultural workers. While higher productivity reduces the effect of lower emission intensities on total emissions by increasing demand for, and output of, food, this is offset by the reduction in land use change. A 30 percent increase in productivity coupled with a reduction in emission intensities of 30 percent ends up achieving almost a 40 percent reduction in total emissions.An IFPRI/ International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) project on agricultural transformations in Africa and Asia has built on the ag-incentives data to create policy taxonomies for agricultural transformation (Baliño et al 2019a). These identify how policies affect the transformation process and seek policy improvements. This framework was used in a major report that examines the performance of 117 countries over 45 years to understand which agricultural policies have succeed or failed (McDougal et al 2018). Without the fundamental data from the Ag Incentives database, it would not have been possible to provide such a comprehensive assessment. The Ag Incentives data have alsoprovided key inputs into a study on progress towards ending hunger and malnutrition that charts the progress that the world has made in improving food security and nutrition over the past 25 years, while documenting that the world remains far from ending hunger and all forms of malnutrition (Laborde,).An important FAO-UNDP-UNDP (2021) report examining possibilities for repurposing agricultural support to transform food systems builds extremely heavily on Ag Incentives data and IFPRI's modeling work. This report examines a wide range of impacts of agricultural support, such as impacts on the farm sector, nature, climate, nutrition, health and equity. On the basis of that analysis, it proposes a systematic and empirical approach to repurposing agricultural support for better outcomes more consistent with the objectives pursued by PIM.The A successful policy reform of agricultural support mechanisms needs to combine economic analysis focused on identifying policy challenges and building coalitions for achieving reforms. This highlights the need for a global Ag-Incentives database that brings together International Organizations:we need proper measurement of policy impact and distortions to agricultural incentives for meaningful policy reform. Economic analysis is useful to help organize the information about policy proposals and answers. While theory is important in guiding how we organize our information and structure models, many important policy questions cannot be answered without empirical analysis. Quantitative techniques allow us to see the impacts of policy interventions on tangible outcomes: income, GHG emissions, prices, poverty rates, etc. Therefore, both a public database like Ag-Incentives and modelling analysis based on this database are necessary to help aid the process of policy reform.PIM also supported other studies relevant to measurement of agricultural incentives in developing countries. These studies focused on measurement of agricultural incentives with a value chain perspective. These studies included analysis of Ethiopian sheep and goats value chains, Nigerian palm oil and cacao value chains, Tanzanian maize and groundnut value chains, and Indian oilseeds and biofuels value chains. These four developing country studies provide examples of how to utilize NRP methodology for future analysis in other countries and other value chains, which will be useful for other researchers in the One CGIAR system.Much recent policy work seeks to identify combinations of policies to achieve multiple goals. This is a new challenge since economists have historically tended to focus solely on economic efficiency, leaving policy makers to make decisions about acceptable equity and sustainable goals with little guidance from economists. Since achieving multiple goals requires the use of multiple instruments (Tinbergen, 1952), it poses challenges about how to choose the best policy options.One popular and very useful approach is to identify some key instruments and to assess their impacts on multiple goals. The radar chart used by Laborde, Bizikova, and Smaller (2020) for sub-targets under Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 2 is a very popular way to convey this type of information for reform of a particular, popular form of support to agriculture (Figure 12). One potential approach to achieving a range of goals is to build on the theory of quantitative economic policy. We know from this theory that achieving multiple goals requires multiple instruments.However, theory provides little guidance on how we might identify optimal policies in this situation. The approach to prioritizing policies outlined in Martin, Ivanic and Mamun (2022) can be used to target multiple goals and to identify both which policies should be used and the settings of these policy instruments.This approach begins by specifying an objective function that values the multiple objectives. This builds on the approach of Theil (1964) but drops the focus on punishing deviations from targets. Rather, it sets goals such as raising national income, reducing poverty, reducing global GHG emissions and improving gender equity. The proposed programming approach then uses non-linear programming to explore the extent to which the objectives can be achieved and to identify the optimal settings of the available policy instruments. Some problems, such as setting of tax or tariff rates, are problems of unconstrained optimization. Others such as allocating scarce investment resources are constrained optimization problems. The Martin, Ivanic and Mamun ( 2022) study provides two illustrative examples:the first involves setting optimal taxes on GHG emissions with both an efficiency and a sustainability objective. The second involves allocating scarce R&D resources to raise income and reduce poverty in Ethiopia. The policy recommendations in both cases take into account the existing distortions in the economy, knowledge of which is provided by data from the Ag-Incentives Consortium.4.1 Policy-Induced Market Distortions along Agricultural Value Chains Global and regional value chains have been expanding in the last decades. This expansion can be attributed to many factors such as lower transaction and transportation costs in international trade, increasing speed of globalization, and a surge of regional trade agreements. Value chains are defined as full range of activities by firms to bring a product to market from origin to final use (OECD, 2013).Although most value chain expansion is in the industrial and the services sectors, global and domestic agricultural value chains are also expanding.The functioning and performance of agricultural value chains are important particularly for smallholder farmers in developing countries. For example, in Africa, 55% of jobs are in agriculture, which is the source of more than 70% of the earnings of the poor (World Bank, 2020). Therefore, governments intervene in agricultural value chains especially as part of their economic transformation plans in countries where agriculture comprises a significant share of the GDP.Any policy measure has repercussions not only for the targeted commodity but also throughout the value chain of the commodity. To understand the implications of agriculture or trade policies for producers, processors, and consumers, it is necessary to correctly define and measure distortions to agricultural incentives along the entire value chain. Any policy distortion will affect the different value chain actors in different ways. A comprehensive analysis would allow design of effective policies and minimize unintended consequences.Oilseed complex allows the test of this new methodology where agricultural commodity (rapeseed, groundnut) is tradable. Ethanol-molasses value chain allows use of the methodology when a new value chain is created through policy. Molasses-sugar complex allows test of a case where by-product, molasses, is created when a product, sugar, is generated through processing of an agricultural commodity, sugarcane. 'Meal + oil' complex is an example when new products are created through processing. Togive an example of the methodology, the formula for VCNRP for \"meal + oil\" value chain is as follows:where 'share' denotes share of seed/nut that is crushed from total production. IP denotes international reference price. DP denotes domestic price.The formula for VCNRP for \"meal + oil + seed\" value chain is as follows:VCNRP integrates the NRP of the raw commodity with the NRP of the downstream products, allowing us to see an aggregate measure of all policy impacts on the commodities and products in the value chain, normalized at the farmgate.Results show that farmers are subsidized. Both sugarcane farmers and sugar processors are subsidized, but sugar processors are subsidized at higher rates (Figure 13), showing that gains are not evenly distributed across value chain actors. Molasses value chain and ethanol value chain are taxed in India, but that taxation is lower for ethanol than for molasses. Value chain NRP for 'ethanol + molasses + inputs' are positive and high at sugar and sugarcane level, indicating net subsidization of the overall chain, but this is due to high subsidization of sugar and sugarcane producers, exceeding the taxation of molasses and ethanol.Groundnut and rapeseed producers have been subsidized by the government, as seen in positive NRPs (Figure 14). VCNRP for 'oil + meal' is also high and positive for rapeseed and groundnut complex.This shows that the oilseed crushing industry producing meal and oil is subsidized enough by domestic agricultural policy that despite rapeseeds and groundnuts being purchased at higher prices, the net impact of policies at state and national levels are positive.When comparing NRPs across these value chains, it can be observed that there is increasing protection along the value chain from commodity to product for the oilseeds sector (i.e., higher NRPs for meal and oils relative to NRPs for seeds and nuts). The picture is less clear for the sugarcane value chain.Sugar NRP is higher than sugarcane NRP, but the molasses and ethanol value chain NRP is negative.Thus, the segment of the value chain that the Indian government protects (farmers or processors) varies based on the type of value chain. A study by Kassie et al. (2019) assessed the sources and magnitude of distortions to agricultural incentives along the small ruminant value chains in Ethiopia. In Ethiopia, small ruminants account for the largest share of total livestock population, second only to cattle. For instance, in 2014/15, excluding pastoralist holdings, there were 29.3 million sheep and 29.1 million goats in the country (CSA, 2015).Similarly, among livestock keepers surveyed in 2013/14, 47.4 percent and 34.9 percent of them owned sheep and goats, respectively (CSA and World Bank, 2015). Small ruminants provide both economic and socio-cultural benefits to the smallholder and poor farmers in the country. They mainly serve as a source of income, meat, milk, manure, and as a store of capital. Moreover, they help mitigate risk from unforeseen environmental shocks, such as droughts and flood (Kassie et al., 2019).Rural farmers keep small ruminants essentially for cash income generation to sustain their meagre-resource based livelihoods. According to CSA ( 2013), the proportion of total sheep and goats sold in the year 2012 was 23.5% and 16.7%, while the proportion of slaughtered was 12% and 7.3%, respectively. However, problems related to market information, market infrastructure, propensity to market orientation, and seasonal price fluctuations have been identified to be among the most important constraints that affect the production and marketing of small ruminants in developing countries like Ethiopia (Dereje et al., 2014, Kocho et al., 2011, Abebe et al., 2013, Ayele et al., 2006, Addis and Ginda, 2015, Eshetu and Abraham, 2016, Asegede et al., 2015).The livestock markets in rural Ethiopia are dominated by a few powerful buyers in rural areas undermining prices received by the numerous, but poor smallholder farmers (Kassie et al., 2016).Similarly, Ethiopian live animal exporting is entangled with inconsistent and rigid taxing system.Different regional governments have different taxing systems for live animals. Taxes on live animals are mainly levied in the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP) and Oromia Regions. This tends to discourage smallholder farmers from supplying their animals to the formal markets and drives them to illicit trading. Ultimately, the supply of animals will be limited. Taxes on live animals at the port are also critical for livestock exporters. The exporters are always complaining about unnecessary taxes imposed on their exports reducing their competitiveness and hence their profitability. Exporters have indicated that the high taxes are forcing them to close their businesses (Molla, 2004).This study on Ethiopian value chains aimed at identifying whether and where the different local and national policies in the country generate distortions to small ruminant producers. The authors also attempted to separate policy induced distortions from market inefficiencies along the value chain.Methodologically, the study estimated NRPs and price gaps at different nodes of the small ruminant value chain. A positive price gap indicates that the policy environment generates incentives (support) to producers or sellers at point of competition [Addis Ababa retail market]. On the other hand, a negative price gap means that the policy environment generates disincentives (taxes) to producers or sellers of small ruminants at point of competition.The study considered four scenarios in the analysis. Under all scenarios, the observed and adjusted price gaps at farmgate and point of competition relative to a comparable reference price for both sheep and goats are negative on the national level and indicate a strong deviation of producer and retailer prices from the comparable reference prices over the studied five-year period (2010-2015) (Figure 15). This means farmers and retailers received prices lower than what they would have received from export markets or international markets due to policy distortions. Furthermore, price gaps for farmers are getting higher over time, although retailers see some improvements in some years of the study. Source: Authors' calculationThe NRPs at farmgate level are negative in all districts under all scenarios. There is some variation of NRPs across districts, showing that some differences over location in policy effects. The access costs generated by the farm survey used in the study also varied across districts showing that market structure and performance are different from market to market.The consistently negative NRP results clearly show that the restrictive policies of the government have negatively impacted the farm households, reducing the prices farmers would have received in a nonpolicy distorted market. Overall, producer NRPs were lower than retail point NRPs, implying that farmers are at a greater disadvantage, although both retailers and producers are receiving disincentives to their activities. If there is such a high gap between retail and farm gate prices, a logical question will be to what extent this pie is shared along the value chain by traders, marketers, and sellers, as this is not going to the producers.It is difficult to separate policy impact from market and value chain inefficiencies, although effort has been done to do so by using market access cost data. It can still be noted that market inefficiencies are due to government policy to a certain extent. The producers and retail traders received price penalization because of the low number of small ruminants traded and the few market opportunities. The fact that farmers and retailers are operating within a market with heavy disincentive entails a serious revision of the grass roots level institutions and policies that increase the burden on farmers and traders.Therefore, it important to emphasize that the sector needs less illicit and explicit taxing and more of a support. The physical and informational disconnection to the market of the smallholder small ruminant keepers in Ethiopia has destined farmers to take prices than being part of the price discovery process. The results imply that there is a need for a deliberate effort to empower farmers through various means, for instance access to information and structured collective action. Market infrastructure development that includes access to financial services would certainly reduce the disincentive farmers are living with.Agriculture is the largest sector in the Nigerian economy, employing around two-thirds of the country's workforce (FAO, 2013). However, over the past 20 years, Nigeria's value-added per capita in agriculture has risen quite slowly (FAO, 2013). Therefore, the Nigerian government has placed renewed focus on supporting agricultural development through a variety of programs, such as the Agricultural Transformation Agenda (FMARD, 2013) and its successor, the Agriculture Promotion Policy 2016-2020 (FMARD, 2016). These policy reforms attempt to support agribusiness that can foster food security, generate exports, and provide sustainable income and job growth. One of the approaches to reach these goals is to prioritize production of rice, wheat, maize, soybeans, and tomatoes as well as export crops such as cacao beans, cassava, oil palm, sesame, and gum Arabic. Furthermore, value chain development is identified as a priority with input supply, production, storage, processing/utilization, marketing, and consumption issues particularly identified (FMARD, 2016).Since Nigerian agricultural value chains have been targeted by a number of policy decisions, it is necessary to understand the implications of these policies on all value chain agents, especially smallholder farmers. Tokgoz et al. (2020) analyzes the import-oriented palm oil value chain and the export-oriented cacao value chain, estimating the price distortions from policies and their implications for production incentives in Nigeria. They utilize NRP methodology at farmgate and border nodes of the value chain. NRPs at the farmgate are computed for palm oil and cacao beans at the regional level in Nigeria. These two value chains were chosen since they form an important share of Nigeria's agricultural sector, affecting a large number of smallholder producers.NRPs for palm oil at the farmgate for the main producing regions in Nigeria are presented in Figure 16. Due to protective trade policy and other domestic policy initiatives, the NRPs at the farmgate are positive and high. Farmgate NRPs vary widely across regions which may be partially because of the impact of regional/state-level policies that contribute to variations in the prices that producers receive.Furthermore, local conditions matter for price transmission including variation in transaction costs, quality premiums, or mark-ups captured by traders (Hatzenbuehler, Abbott, and Abdoulaye, 2017), which may explain a portion of the regional heterogeneity in farmgate NRPs. The differences in farmgate NRPs between two years are significant in value. Producers receive higher prices relative to world prices in 2012/13 than in 2010/11, despite the lower world prices in 2012/13. These results provide some evidence that producers in Nigeria were insulated from palm oil price shocks in international markets. While it is difficult to estimate the exact impact of policies, it appears that protection for producers has increased over time with domestic support policies. Nigeria imposes import tariffs for palm oil, which increases the price of palm oil entering Nigeria, negatively affecting consumers, but assisting producers (Figure 17). The NRPs at the farmgate are higher than NRPs at the border in both years, showing that domestic agricultural policies have further supported producers in addition to trade policies, by increasing the farmgate price. understand the impact of policies on supply and demand. They find that palm oil production was, on average, 11% higher in study period because of policy framework. They also find that palm oil imports were 53% lower because of higher prices of palm oil entering Nigeria. This shows the negative consequences for the consumers through lower available palm oil in the market as well as higher palm oil price they pay.The study also estimates NRPs for the cacao value chain commodities at the border. Figure 18 shows NRPs at the border for these 4 commodities as negative for all years, although Nigeria is a net exporter of all commodities in the period of analysis. These results show that exporters are receiving lower prices than the prices prevailing in international markets, i.e. there are disincentives in Nigeria's export market for cacao despite the lack of export taxes and export quotas or export bans. The negative NRPs at the border for cacao beans and cocoa products may also be due to a quality gap, the export market structure, and the concentration of buyers in global markets. showing disincentives in the cacao beans export market reverberate through the domestic market despite domestic support policies. Farmgate prices in 2012/13 were lower than prices in 2010/11, which mirrors the trends in international markets and Nigerian export prices. This demonstrates that cacao bean producers are not insulated from shocks in international markets. NRPs at the farmgate for cacao beans are lower than NRPs at the border, showing that domestic agricultural policies have generated additional disincentives for producers. While support policies exist for cacao bean producers in Nigeria, they do not appear to be sufficient to protect producers from the disincentives in the cacao bean export market, which reverberates through the domestic market and farmgate prices. Some variation exists across regions for NRPs: South producers have much lower NRPs than South West producers. These differences across regions may be partly due to the impact of regional/state-level policy frameworks that are reflected in different farmgate prices that producers receive. It should be noted that findings of Hatzenbuehler, Abbott, and Abdoulaye (2017) regarding how local conditions matter for price transmission may explain a portion of the regional heterogeneity in farmgate NRPs as well.-80% Market Price Support for cacao beans is estimated at -38,536 million Naira, on average, in the study period showing the decline in revenue of producers at the farmgate due to domestic agricultural policy. Thus, there were no transfers from consumers and taxpayers to producers arising from policy measures. The study also estimated that cacao bean production was 6% lower because of policy distortions, using elasticities from the literature and the estimated NRPs. Cacao bean exports were estimated to be 7% lower, on average, because of policy induced distortions in the export market. Resultsshow that cocoa paste exports were 17% lower, cocoa butter exports were 3% lower, and cocoa powder exports were 11% lower, due to policy distortions.The livelihoods of many smallholder farmers in Tanzania depend upon maize and groundnuts.The value chains for these crops have the potential to expand and contribute to agricultural development through clear policy mechanisms. In order to identify and implement efficient and targeted policies, it is important to measure policy distortions to agricultural incentives along the value chains of these two crops. In this vein, Majeed et al. (2018) measures the impact of agricultural and trade policies using NRP application of import tariffs. When Tanzania is a net exporter (2007/08, 2011/12, 2012/13), the NRPs are -57 percent, 47 percent, and -31 percent, respectively; this demonstrates disincentives in the maize export market in two out of three years. Thus, it appears that Tanzania's border NRPs and trade status imply an anti-trade bias; when maize is imported, it faces an import tariff (hence the positive NRPs in most years during which maize imported) and when it is exported, it is often taxed (hence the negative NRPs in most years during which maize is exported).For maize flour, Tanzania is a net importer for the 2006/07, 2007/08, and 2008/09 crop years and a net exporter for the rest of the period. All border NRPs in our period of analysis are negative (Figure 21). For years during which Tanzania is a net exporter, the negative border NRP is expected and in line with maize value chain underdevelopment. However, the negative NRPs in years during which Tanzania is a net importer are surprising.NRPs at the farmgate for the main producing regions in Tanzania, using the regional farmgate price data, are also computed. Figure 21 shows these NRPs for white maize in Long Rainy Season regions, and Figure 22 shows these NRPs for Short Rainy Season regions. For regions with LRS and SRS, the NRPs are mostly negative. For 2008/09 and 2010/11, Tanzania is a net importer of maize with positive NRPs at the border. However, for these years, farmgate NRPs for most regions and on average are negative. For 2011/12, Tanzania is a net exporter, with negative border and farmgate NRPs. This shows that disincentives in the export market are reverberating through the domestic market.The NRPs differ widely across regions which may be due to i) the impact of regional/state-level policy framework, ii) other market inefficiencies that lead to variation in the prices that farmers receive, and iii) price transmission issues. for groundnut and groundnut oil, and farmgate for groundnut. Figure 23 shows NRPs at the border for both commodities, where Tanzania's trade status changes between net importer and net exporter within the analysis period. For groundnuts, NRPs are negative at the border for all years, regardless of whether Tanzania is a net importer or net exporter. When Tanzania is a net exporter from 2006/07 through 2012/13, the NRPs range between -72% and -35%. When Tanzania is a net importer in 2013/14 and 2014/15, the NRPs are -70% and -66%, respectively. The negative border NRPs during net exporting years show there are disincentives in the groundnut export market, despite the existence of minimal to no export taxes for groundnuts. The negative NRPs in net importer years show that Tanzania paid less than world market prices for groundnut imports. Import tariffs show preferential tariffs for East African Community (EAC) countries with which Tanzania trades with. Thus, negative NRPs in net importer years can be because of that.For groundnut oil, Tanzania was a net importer for the 2007/08 crop year and a net exporter for the rest of the analysis period. All NRPs in period of analysis are negative. For years during which Tanzania is a net exporter, the border NRPs are as expected and in line with underdevelopment of the groundnut oil markets. Tanzania has not yet developed the processing and marketing stages of the groundnut value chain, and inefficiencies in the value chain create disincentives in export markets. When Tanzania imports, it imports from neighbouring countries and thus pays a lower price than international market prices. This is in line with preferential tariffs for EAC countries.The study also computed NRPs at the farmgate for the main producing regions in Tanzania.Figure 24 shows these NRPs for groundnuts in all Long Rainy Season regions for three years (2008/09, 2010/11, 2012/13). For the three years for which we compute NRPs at the farmgate, Tanzania is a net exporter of groundnuts. For all regions and years, the NRPs are negative, showing that disincentives in the groundnut export market reverberate through the domestic market and affect farmers negatively despite numerous agricultural policies meant to support the farmers.NRPs vary across regions even though we include market access costs between farmgate and wholesale markets for each region individually. Therefore, the different NRPs across regions may show the impact of regional/state-level policy framework or other market inefficiencies leading to variation in prices that farmers receive. The findings are important to consider given the renewed pressure for protectionist trade policies as these policies may have wide-reaching and unintended consequences. Further research on the value chain participants and processing channels is needed to identify opportunities for increasing efficiencies in processing and value addition across these two value chains. As countries move through the transformation process from subsistence agriculture to modern agricultural sectors well integrated into the economy, value chain analysis will be increasingly important. As this process proceeds, consumer demands become much more diversified, as does the production mix and more and more food markets involve long and complex value chains. In this situation, there are increasing risks that policies will inadvertently create very serious distortions-such as missing links that prevent or choke off activities that could help both to diversify diets and to increase incomes both on farm and along value chains.The existing literature on agricultural incentives methodology and the institutional databases publishing estimates of agricultural incentives have not focused on understanding the implications of policy space from a gender perspective. Female farmers are important stakeholders in production, especially in developing countries that are dominated by smallholder production practices. Since the main goals of agricultural policies in developing countries include attaining food security and reducing poverty, adding a gender dimension to policy analysis is very important, since the role of women in attaining these goals is well-established.Through three studies, in Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda, Laborde and Lallemant (2016, 2017a, 2017b) attempt to understand the implications of agricultural and trade policies for gender outcomes. To do this, they combine two data sets: i) Ag-Incentives data for NRPs in these three countries, and ii) gender data at the farm and household level (based on surveys). They propose a new methodology for a genderdifferentiated NRP indicator and apply this methodology to Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda agricultural sector data. The three studies also present share of value of production controlled by male and female farmers.The three studies attempt to answer the question \"Do price distorting policies have biased outcomes based on gender?\" Since analysis on how gender roles and biases interact with the transmission and outcome of agricultural policies is very limited, these studies provide a starting point for a discussion on understanding the differentiated impacts of policies on both genders. Klasen and Lamanna (2009) note that there is a positive relationship between smaller gender gaps and economic development based on the literature review they have conducted (theoretical and empirical). Since women are participants in value chains both as consumers and as producers, it is imperative that any policy analysis along the value chain should bring in gender perspectives, data availability permitted.To design a new gender-differentiated price incentive indicator, Laborde and Lallemant (2016, 2017a, 2017b) rely on Nominal Rate of Protection methodology of Krueger, Schiff, and Valdes (1988).NRPs are computed for a commodity in a country. To add a gender dimension to NRP analysis, they ask \"are men and women in a country specialized in different agricultural commodities?\" If this is the case, then any policy framework impacting an agricultural commodity will have different impacts on the male and female farmers since policies vary significantly from one commodity to another.In combining NRP and household survey data sources, gender specific production patterns, including the control of outputs, they compute gender-differentiated NRPs as follows:\uD835\uDC41\uD835\uDC41\uD835\uDC41\uD835\uDC41\uD835\uDC41\uD835\uDC41 Another indicator that may show specialization of women is the distribution of area for by source of control of output. Figure 27 shows that women control area for other cereals, roots & tubers, and beans.Men control cattle, cotton, and sugarcane area. They also look at the share of product quantity by the source of control of output. Consistent with Figure 27 above, Roots and Tubers, beans and other cereals are the crop groups for which the largest share of production is controlled by women. We can also see that cash crops such as coffee, sugarcane, and tea are the crops whose production is strongly dominated by men (Figure 28). Using the survey data, they identify the crops important for women's employment and income.They note that female farmers are weakly involved in the production of key export crops and livestock products, and they are more focused on staple commodities. Since the latter category is affected by a Applying the methodology in equation ( 7), gender-specific NRP results for Uganda are given in Figure 29. NRPs are for women, men, total categories for control. In this Figure, control shares are used as weights, i.e., how much of final product is controlled by men, women, and a total. Since it appears that female and male labor are relatively balanced for certain key crops, the authors do not find significant discrepancies between the NRPs associated with female managed crops and NRPs associated with male managed crops. In 2006In , 2009In , 2010, taxation was higher for commodities controlled by women. In 2005In , 2007In , 2008, support for commodities controlled by men are higher. In 2011In , 2012In , 2013, taxation for commodities controlled by women are lower. For more specific analysis, they rely on LSMS-ISA Ethiopia Socioeconomic Survey Wave 3.They use data on 3,303 households for gender differentiated production pattern data. Below Figure 32 shows the value of production by \"decider\" category. The authors observe that Ethiopia has teff, oilseeds, and livestock as among the top ten highest value of production commodities, which are also dominated by male farmers. The authors also note that in this Figure that some products such as coffee have lower values of production than might be expected. While these crops are important on the national level, and are represented in Ag-Incentives dataset, these products are poorly represented in the household survey sample, which may be due to a scale issue. These types of crops are part of large-scale industrial productions while this household level survey is biased towards smallholders and smaller scale productions.Figure 33 below shows the distribution of the value of production by crop and gender. It can be observed that smaller livestock (poultry, small ruminants) are largely controlled by women. However, important exported goods such as larger livestock, cereals and coffee are mostly controlled by men. This implies a potential specialization of men and women on these particular products. consortium are largely controlled by men. Household survey data shows that women are weakly involved in the production of key export and cash crops. Since the latter category is affected by a positive NRP, a bias in terms of average NRP faced by male and female farmers can be expected.The study on Malawi shows the trends in policy support to farmers. As seen in Figure 34, NRP has changed from positive to negative for groundnuts. Support for tobacco and cotton has increased in some years. Export commodities such as tea and sugar are taxed. Staple crops like maize are supported. In this chapter we propose some future research approaches that build on past work that is summarized in this Report. Specifically, we illustrate a few approaches to move from policy measurement to other research areas that are linked to the Impact Areas of One CGIAR.Value chain innovations and resulting developments could improve rural livelihoods in at least three ways, i.e., through enabling access to inputs and markets, establishing efficiency premium for poor suppliers, and employment opportunities for poor households where the benefits could be very important to the poorest and women (Maertens and Swinnen, 2012).Poorly organized and/or distorted value chains would, however, undermine the opportunities that the poor actors would otherwise exploit. The studies summarized in this Discussion Paper have shown the The value chain framework is important for understanding the gravity of the problems that value chain actors face in developing countries as node level studies rarely show the whole picture. Efforts to eradicate or alleviate poverty need to consider the value chain approach not only because other actors are as important but also farmers/producers are increasingly engaging in downstream activities mainly due to growing market orientation and integration into global agrifood value chains.Transformations of domestic agricultural value chains require development of the different components of the entire agricultural system. Services and infrastructure need to be in place to improve production, marketing, and consumption. The incentive system needs to be designed to ensure smooth transactions and equitable distribution of margins.What is not clear is the impact the distortions have on the welfare of the rural communities who are entirely dependent on agriculture. Similarly, the potential impact of abating distortions on the improvement of livelihoods is not known either. Therefore, it is important to understand the causes and intensity of distortions (not only policy distortions but also inefficiencies caused by the weak integration of markets). However, it is more important to assess the impacts of the distortions or lack thereof along the key agricultural value chains in each economy.There are well established methods to assess the extent of distortions in agricultural value chains (Tokgoz and Majeed, 2019). There is also a set of tools to assess impact of distortions on food insecurity, poverty, and unemployment (Laborde et al., 2016;Martin et al., 2021). It is worth noting that models to be adapted or developed will have to be context specific as the markets and actors along the value chains are different both across location, time, and commodity.In Chapter 5 \"Agricultural Incentives and Gender\", this Discussion Paper summarized PIM supported work on gender dimensions of agricultural policy for three African countries. The three studies used a new methodology developed by Laborde and Lallemant (2016, 2017a, 2017b) to generate genderdifferentiated NRP indicators. The author(s) applied this methodology to show i) how agricultural policy affects different commodities differently, ii) how agricultural commodity production can be controlled by men or women at different levels, and iii) how agricultural policy supporting or taxing a commodity will have different implications for female and male farmers in a country depending on the share of control they have over the production of that commodity.These PIM supported studies are very important since women are participants in agricultural value chains both as consumers and producers, and thus it is essential that any policy analysis should bring gender perspectives, subject to data availability. The studies also pave a path forward for this analysis to be extended to other countries since they provide a new methodology and a description of how publicly available datasets were used to conduct the analysis.To do this work, the authors combine two data sets: i) The Ag-Incentives data set for NRPs, and ii) gender-differentiated data at the farm and household level (based on surveys). Thus, for this type of research to continue, combinations of two types of datasets are necessary. World Bank's LSMS-ISA household surveys 3 are available for various years for eight partner countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Malawi, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Tanzania, and Uganda). Furthermore, GlobalAgricultural Research Data Innovation Acceleration Network (GARDIAN) 4 is CGIAR's metadata repository, including approximately 182,000 publications and 28,000 datasets from more than 30 institutional publications as well as data repositories across all 13 CGIAR Centers and 11 genebanks, and institutional partners. Both sources provide a wide array of household survey data that can be used to extend this effort by Laborde and Lallemant.Female farmers' power over production and sale decisions differs across different commodities in the three countries under analysis. The authors utilize household survey data to compute the share of value of production controlled by male and female farmers. The authors also use the labor share between male and female farmers to allocate the production in each parcel, and the control share between male and female farmers. This way they clearly identify which commodity is predominantly controlled by which gender. This allows the authors to differentiate the impacts of policy framework on female and male farmers in those cases where the policy can be mapped to a specific commodity.The studies also illustrate the importance of data availability to conduct this type of analysis.They find that some commodities are important on the national level, and are represented in the Ag-Incentives dataset. However, these products are poorly represented in the household surveys. This may be due to a scale issue where certain commodities are part of large-scale industrial productions while household level surveys are geared towards smallholders and smaller scale productions.Furthermore, a challenge faced by authors is that some important products for female farmers are not included in the set of commodities monitored at the country level by the Ag-Incentives database. In the case of Ethiopia, the authors observe that crops that are represented in the Ag-Incentives Consortium are largely controlled by men. Household survey data show that women are weakly involved in the production of key export and cash crops. One critical future research topic that can be conducted using the Ag-Incentives database is the link between agricultural support measures and environmental indicators. Section 3 discussed studies that used the Ag-Incentives database to analyze the link between agricultural incentives and environmental outcomes. Another critical environmental concern is water risks in an era of climate change. Agriculture both contributes to and faces water risks globally. OECD (2017b) identifies Northeast China, Southwest United States and Northwest India as the top three water risk hotspot countries for agricultural production.These three countries each constitute a significant share of global agricultural production. Figure 39 shows agricultural sector NRPs for China, India, USA, and a global average. China supports its agricultural sector, above the global average, whereas USA. support for agricultural sector is slightly below global average. India taxes its agricultural sector overall. India constitutes an interesting case study on the link between agricultural support measures and environmental indicators. OECD (2017b) identifies India as being one of three hot spots for water risks.There are ongoing policy efforts to reduce water risks in India such as pilot programs that decouple agriculture subsidies from inputs, such as irrigation (OECD, 2017a), and the Water Conservation Fee for use for drinking, domestic, and commercial purposes. These efforts are essential given the size of Indian agricultural sector, which suffers from groundwater depletion and deteriorating water quality.Figure 39 shows that Indian agricultural sector is overall taxed; however, wide variation exists across sectors and across state lines since agricultural policy is a state matter in India. India's groundwater use, largely driven by agriculture irrigation, is particularly concerning in key agricultural regions such as Northwest. The Northwest region (Punjab, Haryana, Gujarat), which is predominantly cereal-producing, is facing groundwater-related agriculture risks (water table, water quality) relative to the more , 2017a). Agricultural policies at federal and state level encouraged cereal production in this region, which in turn led to overuse of water and groundwater depletion, since wheat and rice are two crops that use a lot of water. Energy subsidies also allowed farmers to irrigate even when a lower water table requires more energy to pump water to surface level.Farmers, thus, have few incentives to use less water-intensive cropping methods or invest in water-saving technologies because of the policy framework (OECD, 2017a). In this context, OECD (2017a) lists redirection of agricultural support policies from water and other inputs towards supporting increased innovation, sustainability and productivity on farms and providing support to low-income households among resource-poor farms as one its policy recommendations. OECD (2017b) notes that existing policies such as energy subsidies and the promotion of solar pumps need to be overhauled in Northwest India. One interesting possibility with solar power is to integrate the solar energy into the grid by providing feed-in tariffs. Not only does this opportunity to generate revenue help raise farmers' incomes, but it raises the opportunity cost of using the electricity to pump water, reducing pressure on aquifers.These examples show how the Ag-Incentives database can be used to explore the link among agricultural policy, agricultural production, and water use in agriculture. Continuation of Ag-Incentives database work would show how agricultural (dis)incentives impact crop production in terms of volume and location on a global, regional, and national basis. This, in turn, would allow for a more comprehensive analysis of issues pertaining to agriculture and water, especially in this era of climate change. One example is agricultural (dis)incentives pertaining to rice. Figure 40 shows average global NRP for the agricultural sector and for rice. Rice is a water-intensive crop, and as seen in Figure 40, is supported on average globally. Figure 41 shows NRPs for cereals for the three water hot spots as well as global averages since cereals require relatively more water for production and are staple crops. As seen above, China supports rice and wheat, USA does not provide support for rice and wheat, and India generally taxes rice and wheat. Globally both crops are supported.The Ag-Incentives database provides an organized starting point to start research on these issues.Resulting production patterns due to agricultural support may favor staple crops that will impact how much natural resources are needed (such as India favoring rice and wheat production in water constrained locations). Having a consolidated database that relies on multi-institutional databases with a global coverage would help future research efforts, particularly when agricultural support measures are linked to modelling efforts for more detailed analysis. Work to date in this area, summarized in section 2.4, provides important insights into the implications of reforming agricultural subsidies for environmental outcomes. This required development of databases both of agricultural incentives and of greenhouse gases and a modeling framework able to analyze the implications of reform at global, national and household level. One key finding from the baseline analysis is that emissions will rise substantially if policies are not reformed. Another is that simple rearrangement of current policies-up to and including abolition of current policies-would not be enough to bring about the extent of GHG reduction needed to contribute fully to GHG abatement. What appears to be needed is more comprehensive reform that targets reductions in emissions. Policies that dedicate a portion of support to R&D that reduces emissions-particularly from ruminants-and raises productivity seem likely to be needed to bring about that outcome. Such policies would generate strongly favorable outcomes not only for the environment but also, by reducing the cost of healthy diets and reducing the pressure of agricultural demand for land.Many more questions can be addressed by building on the modeling frameworks developed for these studies. One key question that has not yet been addressed is the time profile of emissions. Most agricultural emissions are from methane, which is much more potent as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide but lasts a shorter time in the atmosphere. Reducing methane emissions could be a very valuable first step towards reducing the global warming impact of overall emissions.Another unexplored area is the implications of Border Carbon Adjustments as a companion to carbon taxes or other policies designed to reduce GHG emissions. Much of the motivation for this type of policy comes from political-economy considerations-it may be politically easier to implement such a measure than a standard carbon tax. Exploratory analysis by Martin (2021) suggests that there may also be an efficiency gain as a result of switching from a tax on emission to a tax on use of goods or activities that are emission-intensive. Certainly, the agricultural sector will likely be affected even if it is not directly included, because current proposals include taxes on nitrogen fertilizers.Governments intervene in the agricultural sector to achieve multiple goals. The explicit goals of interventions include achieving food and nutrition security, protecting the livelihoods of farmers, and aiding the rural economy, but the particular interventions used are typically heavily guided by policy makers' need to generate and retain political support (Anderson, 1995). Particularly in developing countries, the agricultural sector is still important as a source of income and, especially, of employment.Furthermore, any agricultural policy measure impacts all economic agents along the value chain of the commodity that is targeted. In this context, it is necessary to correctly measure the extent to which policies distort market prices of the commodities chain, and to understand the implications of protection provided to other sectors, that affects agricultural incentives through real exchange rate impacts.This Discussion Paper summarizes and draws lessons from multiple studies that were supported by CGIAR Policies, Institutions and Markets (PIM) program on agricultural incentives. PIM-supported studies include i) the Ag-Incentives database that is a global public good in coordination with the International Organizations, ii) studies that explore the links between agricultural incentives and value chain development in developing countries, iii) studies that explore the link between gender and agricultural incentives, and iv) studies that explore the links between agricultural incentives and environmental outcomes.The global Ag-Incentives database was the starting point of these efforts since it generated a harmonized and consolidated database of measurement of distortions to agricultural incentives based on OECD, FAO-MAFAP, IDB, and World Bank efforts. The Ag-Incentives Consortium, of which PIM was a part of, enabled the continuing effort of the publicly available database. This multi-institutional collaboration provided a reliable database that can be utilized by various stakeholders, including policy makers, researchers, and market participants.PIM also supported studies that brought forward a broader perspective of agricultural incentives and value chain development. These studies particularly focused on value chains in developing countries:Ethiopia, India, Nigeria, and Tanzania. These studies estimated distortions to agricultural incentives along the value chains of the selected commodities and showed the importance of the overall policy framework for value chain development.Another set of studies linked the Ag-Incentives database to the ongoing discussion on repurposing of agricultural support. These studies also explored the link between agricultural incentives and environmental outcomes. PIM also supported studies that examined gender dimensions of agricultural policy by drawing from gender-differentiated NRP indicators computed for Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda. These studies provide a roadmap and methodological tools for future research. Researchers","tokenCount":"14605"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0078275275.json b/data/part_1/0078275275.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8b408178c643074dda933bcaea15da972bb7cb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0078275275.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"afde7802b3d0bef21cdd693ffe03496b","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/8e132058-0b97-4a48-9fdd-79c36bfd4db7/retrieve","id":"457333082"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"07f1cf70-a447-47b7-86f4-d010a9730e58","pagecount":"52","content":"The Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) is a joint international institution of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States and the European Union (EU). CTA operates under the framework of the Cotonou Agreement and is funded by the EU. For more information on CTA, visit www.cta.int ABOUT CTA DISCUSSION PAPERS CTA Discussion Papers are commissioned reviews of information on topics related to the Centre's work. They are intended to inform future work by CTA and its partners and to stimulate further discussion.This study was commissioned by the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation ACP-EU (CTA) to assess the financial behaviour of cassava farmers in Ghana and Nigeria, in relation to their usage of cash and their interest in mobile payments for their farm products as a gateway to other digital finance products. Data from smallholder farmers were collected through focus group discussions (FGDs) and surveys carried out in the cassava producing regions of Ashanti, Brong-Ahafo and Volta in Ghana, and the communities of Oleh, Olicha and Ozoro in Nigeria.The demographics of the cassava farmers who responded to surveys in Ghana and Nigeria are as follows:• Most farmers are women -52.6% in Ghana and 55% in Nigeria. • Most farmers are over the age of 30 -88% in Ghana and 82.2% in Nigeria. • Most are subsistence farmers -65.7% in Ghana and 98.1% in Nigeria -where cassava is their primary source of income. • There are considerable differences between the two countries in terms of the level of education of cassava farmers. In Ghana, 40.2% of farmers had not completed primary school, while in Nigeria, only 11% had not completed a primary education.In both countries, most land used for cassava cultivation is either leased or family owned (titled or non-titled). In Ghana, cassava farmers frequently grow other crops to mitigate losses associated with low cassava yields. However, in Nigeria, very few other crops are grown by cassava farmers. Instead, they mitigate against potential crop failures by diversifying their income sources -a retail business (kiosk), for example.Cash transactions dominate the entire cassava value chain in both Ghana and Nigeriafarmers receive payments for their produce in cash and pay their expenses in cash. Three quarters or more of cassava farmers in both Ghana and Nigeria are in the habit of saving, whether formally with a financial institution or informally by way of home storage, Susu collectors or Savings and Credit Cooperatives.The main priorities for saving are paying school fees, maintain the farm and pay for agricultural inputs such as seeds and fertilisers. Farmers who are not saving are primarily not doing so because they don't have the money.Despite high ownership of mobile phones among cassava farmers in both countries (83.6% in Ghana and 95.6% in Nigeria), mobile money uptake is much higher in Ghana where 52.8% of cassava farmers use the service, compared with only 4% in Nigeria.Both the education level and technical knowhow of Nigerian farmers are higher than that of farmers in Ghana, suggesting that these are not significant barriers to uptake of mobile money services, suggesting another reason for the low uptake in Nigeria. It is possible that greater awareness of mobile money services, through radio and word of mouth, in Ghana compared with Nigeria (60% versus 40%, respectively) might at least in part explain the greater uptake and willingness to use mobile phones for financial transactions in Ghana.In both Ghana and Nigeria, cassava farmers perceive mobile payments to be convenient, fast, safe and affordable, but expressed concerns about their technical know-how, delays in conducting a transaction due to unreliable network connectivity and the risk of phone loss or theft.The study therefore offers the following recommendations:• Interventions are needed to encourage youth into cassava farming. • Campaigns to increase awareness of mobile money are needed to improve uptake. • Mobile money operators should collaborate with agribusiness to strengthen their agent and merchant networks where farmers live and work. • Education programmes on mobile money use will improve farmers' capacity, confidence and trust in these services. • Providing incentives will increase uptake of mobile money services.Cassava production in Ghana is dominated by an adult population of farmers who are above 30 yearsof registered mobile money users do not do any transactions on the platform 14.8% (FAO and IFAD, 2005). The majority of this dramatic growth in production was driven by Ghana and Nigeria, Africa's second and first largest producers of cassava, respectively. Increases in both the planted area and in yields have been credited for increased production.In Ghana, cassava is one of the most commonly grown roots and tubers and has recently been declared as 'Crop of the Decade' by the African Union according to an article by the Business and Financial Times (2016). Cassava constitutes about 22% of Ghana's agricultural gross domestic product (GDP) (Otoo, 1998). Data from the Statistics and Research Information Directorate of Ghana's Ministry of Food and Agriculture (2013) reveal that production of cassava in Ghana has increased by approximately 33%, from 9,731,000 metric tonnes (t) in 2002 to 14,547,000 t in 2012. This growth has been attributed to the increase of land under cultivation (WAAPP, 2009;Kleih et al., 2013). Cassava's contribution to Ghana's economy is now greater than any other crop, including cocoa which is acclaimed to be the backbone of Ghana's economy (WAAPP, 2009).In Nigeria, cassava is considered a 'poor man's crop'. Almost all farmers receive cash payments for their crop. Unlike cassava farmers in Ghana, Nigerian farmers do not produce many other crops and yet only 15% of Nigerian farmers invest in fertilisers to help improve their cassava yields. Nevertheless, even though it is a subsistence crop with a fragmented value chain, Nigeria is the leading producer of cassava worldwide. Unfortunately, the industrialisation of cassava in Nigeria is constrained by private sector wheat importers who consider cassava's potential substitution of wheat to be a threat.The significant role of agriculture in nation building all over the world cannot be overemphasised. Attitudes, practices and knowledge around money vary widely between countries, and the specific value chain a farmer participates in will strongly influence their financial options and behaviours. This study considers what lessons might be learned from the cassava value chain in the context of CTA's interest in the potentials of:• digital financial services for agriculture, such as mobile payments for farmers' products • other payment streams for financial inclusion of farmers • index based insurance services • digital services to support access to loans and credits.This research provides a comprehensive market study of cash usage behavioural practices and financial literacy among cassava farmers in Ghana and Nigeria. Specifically, this study:• analyses the demographic profile of targeted farmers in Ghana and Nigeria within the cassava growing regions • maps the production and marketing of cash payment flows • analyses the current usage of mobile money among targeted farmers • analyses the experience of targeted farmers with mobile money and its potential for adoption.This study provides a common framework and approach for how cash usage behaviour (CUBeR) can be assessed for farmers not only in cassava, but more broadly for farmers in other value chains in ACP.This comprehensive market study used a mixed method approach of qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques. The study in Ghana focused on cassava farmers from the three leading crop producing regions: Ashanti, Brong Ahafo and Volta. In Nigeria, the study focused on cassava farmers in the communities of Oleh, Olicha and Ozoro.Emphasis was placed on the farmers who sell their produce to processors.The data collection was carried out in four phases:As well as the FGDs, a total of 909 cassava farmers were interviewed directly -460 in Ghana and 449 in Nigeria. Representative sample sizes were estimated using methods described in Annex 1. In Ghana, surveys were conducted using an approved survey instrument that was deployed on Farmerline's Mergdata electronic survey platform. The Farmerline's Mergdata platform was also used in Nigeria, but was implemented by FLV Logistics. To capture the survey data, enumerators in Ghana and Nigeria were trained on Mergdata as well as on the use of the mobile devices on which the Mergdata application was installed. Captured data were synchronised with the platform and then exported to Excel (SPSS was also used) for further analysis.In order to capture preliminary data to inform the FGDs and individual surveys, the Unstructured Supplementary Service Data (USSD)/Voice functionality of Farmerline's Mergdata platform was used to survey over 2,000 farmers in Ghana. In Nigeria, the citizen engagement platform Kryout, provided by Kowree, placed calls to 500 farmers and received 328 phone replies. The results of these direct-to-farmer surveys informed the subsequent design of Phase III and Phase IV instruments.In addition to secondary data collection, primary data collection was carried out with key informants by the team lead, LHB Associates, using an illustrative open-ended question set. Interviews were conducted with key experts from NGOs, private sector, academia, commodity buyers, financial institutions, service providers, regulators, Ministry of Agriculture and other stakeholders involved in agriculture in general as well as cassava specifically.In Ghana, six FGDs were organised across the three study areas (two per study area) with eight farmers participating in each group. Farmers were randomly selected from a pool of farmers in each community who farm cassava as a main crop and sell to processors. The FGDs were conducted in 2016, between 31 August and 5 September. In Nigeria, the six FGDs -two in each of the three communities -each had six farmers participate. The research teams used an approved focus group discussion guide to lead discussions and collect data from the 48 farmers in Ghana and 36 farmers in Nigeria.PHASE 3Interviews with key informants, combined with secondary data, provided insights into current and ongoing activities happening in Ghana to increase uptake of mobile payments. Vodafone in Ghana is implementing a grant from the GSMA's mAgri Programme -an initiative that the trade body set up to improve productivity and profitability of smallholder farmers. Tigo continues to implement Rice Mobile Finance (RiMFin), an initiative that pays rice farmers in the Volta region using Tigo Cash, with Wienco Inc., even though funding support from VISA expired in 2014. Tigo is also the partner in a US$433,000 (€367,000) initiative from the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) to introduce mobile payments in cocoa, dried fruit and palm oil. The World Bank and the Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP) are currently in discussions with Cargill and are providing technical assistance to Olam to digitise their cash payments to their cocoa and cashew farmers.The World Cocoa Foundation has already conducted similar cash usage behaviour research for the cocoa value chain in Ghana.It is useful to compare some of the high level findings from their October 2015 study with data collected for this report:• 94% of cocoa farmers have a mobile phone versus 84% of cassava farmers • 92% of cocoa farmers are willing to use mobile money versus 71% of cassava farmers • 30% of cocoa farmers have a bank account versus 47% of cassava farmers • 15% of cocoa farmers have a mobile wallet versus 63% of cassava farmers.The results between the cocoa research in 2015 and this cassava CUBeR might be explained by the difference in time and/or as differences between the value chains.Meanwhile, cassava processors state that government support for cassava in Ghana is \"non-existent\" and that \"flour millers don't want cassava\" and \"high quality cassava flour has never been produced\". Cassava is consumed primarily as a starch. Mobile payments were perceived by cassava processors to be beneficial for the supply chain as well as farmers.Figure The other benefits of mobile money identified by participants are that it is fast, secure and easy. The challenges participants identified with mobile money are:• low community education about usage • inadequate number of mobile money agents • occasional transaction delays • high mobile money fees.Over half of farmers who participated in FGDs mentioned that they save for needs such as building works, health, motor vehicles, school fees and funerals. As for the types of services that they pay for within the community, most mentioned agricultural inputs, such as fertilisers, as well as school fees, utility bills and daily groceries. Almost all of these payments are made with cash.Cultivation of cassava is a labour intensive process and therefore the age of farmers can be important. Of the 453 farmers that provided their age, the majority of respondents (47.6%) were above the age of 45 while the least predominant age group (11.1%) was 18-30 year-olds (Figure 3). This implies that young adults are not as involved in cassava production in Ghana. This is consistent with the findings of the West African Agricultural Productivity Program (WAAPP) ( 2009) that the sector is dominated by old-and middle-aged farmers.Of the 460 farmers interviewed, 218 were men and 242 were women. The study revealed that farmers who sell their produce to processors were mostly women representing 52.6% of the sample population (Figure 2). Education plays an important role in farmer acceptance and adoption of new technologies. Among cassava farmers surveyed, 26.7% (123) had completed primary school, 26.1% (120) had no schooling at all, and 14.1% (65) had started but not completed primary school.The household size ranges from 1 to 20 people with a mean of 6 (±2.7). The main source of income for most cassava farmers is from subsistence/small-scale farming (65.7%) followed by commercial or large-scale farming (16.5%). The remaining 17.8% of surveyed farmers had other main sources of income, including trading, private and public sector jobs, pension benefits, money from relatives, rent and returns on investment (Figure 5).Among cassava farmers whose main income source is subsistence/small-scale farming, the majority (42%) reported a monthly income range of GH¢251-1,000 (€48-193) and 34% reported a range of GH¢250 (€48) or less (Figure 6). At the extreme ends of the spectrum, 7% reported no income, while 5% reported a monthly income of GH¢3001 (€579) or more.The status of land ownership varied widely among the farmers. The two main ownership classifications are leasing (32%) and titled family ownership (28%) as presented in Figure 7. Production and marketing cash flows of cassava farmersThe survey results show that in addition to cassava production, farmers cultivate other crops, such as (in order of frequency) maize, plantain, vegetables, yam, leguminous plants, cocoyam and cocoa. This mixed cropping approach increases the resilience of farmers, enabling them to smooth out their incomes when one or more crops decline in yield or fail entirely.The surveys reveal that 46.3% (213) of cassava farmers sell their produce to traders, 38% (175) sell to processors, 10.2% (47) sell to exporters and 15% (69) sell to their lead farmers (Figure 8). Adade Gari Processors, Caltech Ventures Limited, Josema Gari Processing and Krobo Gari Processors were among the processors that farmers mentioned selling to. Finally, the traders the surveyed farmers sell to include Green Acres Farm, poultry farmers, market women (especially from Mampong and Kumasi cities), Agricfo, and chop bars and fufu sellers, which are operators of canteen-like businesses.The majority of farmers (90%) receive sales payments twice a year while the remaining 10% get paid only once a year. Most farmers (76%) make sales individually, compared with 8% who sell through a farmer cooperative. Two hundred and seventy-seven (60.2%) farmers negotiate the sale of their products at their homes while 169 farmers (36.7%) sell their cassava tubers on the farm (Figure 9). The overwhelming majority of farmers (91.5%) receive payments in cash, 8.3% receive payments in cheque and 0.3% via bank transfer (Figure 10). Among all the surveyed farmers, 88% have a family member who owns a mobile phone. This seems to explain why 71.8% of farmers do not share their mobile phone with other family members. The study also revealed that one in every three farmers (34.2%) have multiple SIM cards.In addition to 88% of farming households owning more than one phone, when asked why they do not share their mobile phone with family members, 53% indicated other reasons most of which are personal. This lends some credence to the fact that the mobile phone is a very personal device.Of the farmers who do not share their phone with family members, 15% indicated this was due to a lack of knowledge within the household about operation of a phone, 12% said replacing a phone is expensive and 10% said airtime charges are expensive (Figure 13).The survey revealed that on average, farmers spent about GH¢25.00 (€4.83) on airtime purchases monthly. Other than airtime sellers, the most common place for airtime purchase is the neighbourhood grocery/corner store.Figure 14 shows that 87.3% of the surveyed farmers are able to use their mobile phones to make and receive calls and 73.2% can use their phones to check their airtime balance. However, only 55% and 67.6% of surveyed farmers know how to receive and send SMS/ texts, respectively. It is possible that the low understanding of SMS/text functions is related to the level of education completed by the farmer (Figure 4), but as this correlation was not specifically looked at in this study, this cannot be confirmed.Of the total farmers surveyed, only 65 (14.1%) responded yes to having access to the internet on their mobile phones. Among those 65 with internet access, only 45 farmers (69.2%) know how to operate the internet on their mobile phones. The majority (80%) of farmers interviewed generally rated their mobile network operator's service to be good, very good or excellent (Figure 17). Savings among cassava farmersThe majority of respondents (52.6%) save their incomes through traditional methods.Among cassava farmers, traditional methods include keeping money in the house (under pillows, in cupboards, etc.), Susu 1 collectors and Savings and Credit Cooperatives (SACCOs), or even saving with their relatives, friends or farmer groups (Figure 18). A very small proportion of the cassava farmers (1%) actually save by purchasing property (livestock, gold) or other household assets.The remaining 47% of farmers interviewed save money with at least one financial institution. The main reasons farmers save are to:• pay school fees for their children • buy farm and agriculture inputs or do farm maintenance • meet emergencies, such as health, funerals and natural calamities (Figure 19).The main reasons farmers do not save with financial institutions are:• they have no money • financial institutions are too far away and expensive • they do not have the required documentation to open an account at a financial institution (Figure 20).In addition, there were eight farmers who stated that they do not trust financial institutions.1 Susu is a traditional savings method, often described as a savings club, where members pay each month to the 'susu' who rotates each month among the members. The main transactions made by cassava farmers who keep their money in financial institutions include cash deposits and withdrawals, receiving salary or payments from buyers, and receiving benefits and/or insurance payments. The majority of farmers interviewed reported depositing money into their account one to three times every six months. Very few farmers reported depositing money four or more times per month (Figure 22). Mobile money is the most frequently used e-payment method used by 343 of the 460 farmers surveyed (74.6%), followed by bank transfer via bank branch (3%), cheque and other (each 2%) as shown in Figure 23.Mobile money agents were the most popular method for registering for mobile money (30.7%) followed by registration at a bank branch or mobile operator's office in a big town (7%), as shown in Figure 24. The cassava farmers that use mobile money do so primarily for sending and receiving money. A few others save on the service, receive payments from customers and purchase airtime, while 68 farmers (14.8%) do not use mobile money for any reason (Figure 25). In terms of branded mobile wallet usage for sending and receiving money, the farmers interviewed used the following providers in descending order of popularity: MTN (47.8%), Vodafone (8.7%), Tigo (4.6%) and Airtel (3.3%).More than 3 months ago More than 2 months but less than 3 months ago More than 1 month but less than 2 months ago More than 1 week but less than 1 month agoIn the past week Twenty-eight percent (130 farmers) had used mobile money for a financial transaction within the past month, followed by 22% (103 farmers) who used the service more than three months ago for a transaction.Of the 343 farmers that use mobile money most frequently, the majority of farmers (57.4%) can reach a cash-in/cash-out agent in less than five minutes. Another 28.9% (99 farmers) can reach an agent within five to 30 minutes.According to the farmers, their three top reasons for using mobile money are because it is:• easily available/accessible • convenient • secure.Figure 28 reveals the monthly outflows for farmers. These data show that education, food, agricultural inputs and electricity are the largest expenses. About 70% of farmers (321) pay for these expenses in cash, and most of these expenses are incurred monthly (Figure 29). Figure 30 reveals that the majority of mobile money sending and receiving occurs once a month. Further, most of those monthly transactions are to receive money. The average that most farmers send is GH¢100 (€19.30) and the average they receive is GH¢200 (€38.60). With regards to incentives to promote mobile money usage, farmers prefer airtime bonuses as well as gift items such as mobile phones, branded T-shirts and cash back as e-float (Figure 31). Mobile money in Nigeria began seven years ago but unlike Ghana and most of the rest of Africa it is not led by the mobile network operators (MNOs). Nigeria is the largest country in Africa and the financial exclusion of the rural population is of significant policy concern. In pursuit of the financial inclusionary benefits of mobile money the Central Bank has licensed 21+ MMOs that can be either banks or other third-party providers. Unfortunately, mobile money uptake, in urban as well as in rural areas, has been modest. This is believed to be because MNOs have confined their operations to the same urban customer base served by banks. Many believe the Central Bank's departure from the MNO-led model does not leverage the potential of the MNOs nationwide customer base.While mobile money has had slow uptake to date given the size of the country and its significant diaspora population there are some compelling dynamics that indicate there will soon be mobile money uptake. Nigeria is the fifth largest receiver of remittances globally (Chinedu, 2017) which amounts to US$21 billion (€19.4 billion) annually (Wall Street Journal, 2015). Mobile money international remittances reduce the cost of traditional money transfer (Western Union, MoneyGram, etc.) by more than 50% (GSMA, 2016).According to the Vice Chairman of the Nigerian Communications Commission there needs to be \"a mobile money kiosk located in every street especially in rural areas where the need is the greatest\" (Ezeh, 2016). This study considers the potential for mobile money uptake in the cassava value chain for which there is some room for optimism. Observations from the FGDs have been selectively integrated throughout the following narrative.Figure 32. Locations of FGDs in NigeriaOf the 449 farmers surveyed, 202 (45%) were men and 247 (55%) were women.As shown in Figure 34, most farmers (42.9%) belong to the middle age group (31-45 years), followed closely by the 45+ age group (39.3%). Only 17.8% of farmers are young adults (18-30 years).Among the cassava farmers 62.1% ( 279) have exceeded a level of education beyond primary school (Figure 35). This indicates a level of literacy that bodes well for the potential uptake of mobile crop payments given that illiteracy is a key barrier. Consistent with the National Population Commission statistics on average household size in Nigeria, the average cassava farming household size is five. One-fifth of the cassava farming households (20%) have 10-20 inhabitants. In most of these cases, the inhabitants include farm labourers and other workers who also reside in the household. These large households also present high cash payment streams that can be migrated to mobile payments.In Nigeria, the overwhelming majority (440 or 98.1%) of cassava producers are subsistence farmers with the balance being commercial/ large scale farmers. Across all age groups, respondents are engaged in a range of other occupations in both formal and informal sectors. The majority of respondents are engaged in more than one income-generating activity. There were 397 farmers (88.6%) that earned ₦60,000 (€141.18) or less per month. This is combined income from all farm and off-farm sources.Of the population of farmers that had more than one source of income, 58.3% of them maintained a kiosk for petty trading.Discussions within the focus groups revealed that the other income sources are varied: The majority (66%) of farmers sell to local collector and export buyers (Figure 39). Another 31.8% of farmers sell to major collectors/traders. There seems to be no established market relationships because farmers sell to the buyers that happen to be in their community at harvest time. In addition, prices are individually negotiated for each transaction, and there is likely to be market price information asymmetry between the buyer and seller. This fragmented nature of cassava marketing can be a challenge for promoting uptake of mobile payments by one or more buyers to individual farmers. Nevertheless, an innovative buyer can secure strategic advantage by embracing the potential of mobile money solutions to streamline their supply chain management. This robust volume of farming household income presents additional value proposition for the integration of a cassava mobile payments scheme.The majority of farmers (65.4%) sell their produce at the local marketplace (Figure 40). Seventy-nine farmers (17.8%) negotiate pricing and sell their produce at their home while 62 farmers (13.9% do so at their farm.Four hundred and thirty (95.8%) of the 449 farmers surveyed own a mobile phone. Of these farmers, 229 (53.3%) are women and 201 (46.7%) are men. A contributing factor to this high rate of mobile phone ownership might be the high rate of literacy indicated by the 89% of farmers (400) who have completed primary school (Figure 35). This high rate of mobile phone ownership (and literacy) bodes well for potential mobile money uptake within the cassava value chain in Nigeria. While the primary purpose of the mobile phone is for voice communication, about 68% (292) of the farmers who own a phone know how to receive an SMS/text message. However, only 57.9% (249) of farmers know the more complicated keystrokes necessary for sending SMS/text messages. A total of 192 farmers (42.8%) expressed willingness to use their mobile phone for financial transactions. This included the potential for receiving mobile payments for the sale of their cassava as well as sending/ receiving money for other purposes, such as making bill payments. This rate is lower than this study's finding in Ghana of 71.1%, which might be due to the lower levels of mobile money uptake and trust in financial service providers in Nigeria. Some other mobile phone services that farmers would consider include receiving information about market pricing, availability of fertiliser and harvest timing. This willingness of farmers to use mobile money could be leveraged by cassava buyers to transition them to mobile crop payments. The practice of saving is a well-developed discipline among cassava farmers in Nigeria. A total of 375 (83.4%) farmers save money formally with financial institutions and/or informally through traditional means (home, groups, collectors/agents). As stated by a young FGD participant \"anyone that has a vision will save\" (female, 18-30 years). As portrayed during FGDs their savings habits enable them to achieve four objectives: parental responsibilities, controlled spending, new/existing investments and increased self-confidence/security. Some of the comments made at FGDs include:The mobile network operator MTN serves 61% (274) of the Nigerian farmers surveyed. The next most prominent MNO is Globacom serving 26% (116) of farmers. Farmers typically use multiple SIM cards but MTN is perceived to have the higher quality network service. -Male, 45 years + Saving (especially for a predetermined goal) is considered necessary to curb excessive spending, thus ensuring financial discipline.Saved funds can be invested in new business opportunities or ploughed into existing ones for further expansion.Having some savings gives some level of self-confidence and sense of security. Of the 375 farmers who save formally and/ or informally, 51% (191) of them save with a formal financial institution. During the FGDs it was revealed that those who save with a financial institution do so because it is safe and they earn interest. It also makes them eligible for loans. As stated by one FGD participant:For safe keeping of our money. And to earn interest.\"Of the 375 farmers who save, there are 184 farmers (49%) who only save informally. Over 100 of these farmers (60%) primarily save in and/or around their house (i.e. under a mattress, inside a cupboard). This is most prominently followed by savings channels with SACCOs (14.4%) and farming cooperatives (10.9%). SACCO and cooperative saving deposits are made on a daily, weekly or monthly basis within a group savings/lending context. Deposits are also made with collectors/agents (5.5%) that visit the household on a daily or weekly basis and then return the collected money, less the agent's fee, to the saver after an agreed to period of time.The top three saving priorities for the cassava farmers surveyed were: their children's education (22.6% of farmers), a fund for emergencies (20%), and meeting daily needs (19%) (Figure 50). Farm-related activities, such as revitalising crops, purchasing agricultural inputs or land for farming, were mentioned as priorities by nearly 28% of farmers (combined total). In-house under the mattress, inside cupboards, etc. 60%The 258 farmers (57.5%) who do not save with a financial institution or who do not save at all were asked why they do not save with a financial institution. The most significant reason, cited by 30% of those farmers, was they did not have enough money to save (Figure 51). Another 21% of those farmers said they do not have the requisite documentation to open an account, followed by 16% of farmers who felt the bank fees were too expensive. Of the 191 farmers that save with a formal financial institution, 107 farmers (56%) prefer to do their deposit and withdrawal transactions inside the financial institution.Another 72 farmers (38%) prefer to conduct their transactions at an automated teller machine (ATM).Most farmers (33.7%) using a formal financial institution make five or more deposits in a six-month time period (Figure 53). In spite of the mobile money usage, and aligned with discussion from the focus groups, 40% of farmers believed the most important benefit of mobile money is either reduced transport cost (20%) or time savings (20%) (Figure 58). Meanwhile, the most significant concern about using mobile money for 32% of farmers was the risk of losing their phone (Figure 59). This was closely followed by 30% of farmers who believed they did not have the technical skills to use mobile money on their phone. These concerns were echoed during the FGDs, where concerns were expressed about the safety and security of the mobile money For 287 farmers (64%), cash is their primary mode of payment for basic household expenses. The use of credit is considered by 126 farmers (28%) to be their primary mode of payment. Both of these payment behaviours present transaction flows that can be migrated to mobile payments.Most household bills are paid monthly (52%), while 14.3% are paid daily, 11.4% weekly and 7.2% every two weeks (Figure 64). Weekly, daily and bi-weekly payment frequencies are more suitable from a mobile money perspective, compared to monthly or annual bill payments.Figure 65 reveals that respondents make 48% of their payments at the point of purchase for products and services, while 40% make payments at the household/farm, for services such as farm labour, as well as repair, construction and other manual labour.Relatively few farmers use the bank branch (11%) and utility office (1%) to make cash payments, probably due to the inconvience and cost in terms of transport and time. Approximately 96% of farmers need 30 minutes or less to reach a location where they can access (deposit or withdraw) funds and travel less than 5 km to get there (Figure 66). The introduction of mobile crop payments, together with an infrastructure of cash-in/ cash-out agents and merchants conveniently located where farmers live and work, will be of significant benefit to farmers. During the FGDs farmers stated that they send and receive money to and from spouses, friends, relations, business partners and customers. They do so through both formal and informal means. This applies regardless of whether the transfers are local or international. For international transfers, they do so formally through international money transfer operators like Western Union, and informally by hand delivery through friends and relatives. For local transfers they do so formally through their bank accounts and by direct deposit into the recipient's bank account, as well as informally by hand delivery through friends and relatives, recharge cards, inter/intra state bus services or known drivers.Sending and receiving money is done monthly by the majority of farmers. In terms of sending remittances, 346 farmers (77%) send ₦10,000 (€23.53) or less and the average amount sent for all farmers is ₦4,696 (€11.04) (Figure 70). The average amount of remittances that farmers receive, ₦9,316 Cassava farmers and their customers• The ratio of male to female farmers engaged with the production of cassava is about the same in Ghana and Nigeria.• In both countries, 80-90% of cassava farmers are above the age of 30.• In Ghana, only 33.1% of cassava farmers have more than a primary school education, though 52.8% use mobile money. This contrasts with Nigeria where 62.1% of cassava farmers have more than a primary school education, but only 4% use mobile money.• The average farming household size in both countries is between five and six people.• Cassava is the main source of income for the majority of smallscale farmers in both countries. In Ghana and Nigeria, 80-90% of farmers earn €215 or less monthly.• To mitigate the risk of low cassava yields, farmers in Ghana cultivate other crops, such as maize. In Nigeria, however, farmers diversify their income portfolio, owning a retail trade such as a kiosk as well as farming.• In both countries, most land used for cassava cultivation is either leased or family owned (titled or non-titled).• The main customers of the cassava farmers who participated in the study are traders and processors who individually negotiate prices with farmers at their homes or at the farm gate. This points to some level of personal relationship between farmers and customers.• Cash transactions dominate the entire cassava value chain -farmers receive payments for their produce in cash and pay their expenses in cash.• Three quarters or more of cassava farmers in Ghana and Nigeria are in the habit of saving, whether formally with a financial institution or informally by way of home storage, Susu collectors or SACCOs.• The main priorities for saving are paying school fees, maintain the farm and pay for agricultural inputs such as seeds and fertilisers.• Farmers who are not saving are primarily not doing so because they don't have the money.• Mobile phone ownership among farmers is 83.6% in Ghana and 95.6% in Nigeria.Phones are perceived to be a personal tool, which farmers will typically not share with other family members.• In both countries, mobile phones are primarily used for making and receiving calls and more people can receive text messages than can send them.• Six out of ten farmers in Ghana have heard of mobile money through radio and word of mouth, but only four out of ten farmers in Nigeria have heard of mobile money.• Mobile money usage is much higher in Ghana (52.8%) than in Nigeria (4%), despite farmers having a higher education level and text messaging competency in Nigeria. This suggests that education and technical knowhow aren't necessarily the main barriers to mobile money uptake.In Ghana, the most commonly known and used e-commerce method was mobile money, whereas in Nigeria it was ATM.• In both countries, mobile money was primarily used for sending and receiving money.• More farmers in Ghana (71.1%) expressed a willingness to use their mobile phones for financial transactions than did farmers in Nigeria (42.8%).• Farmers perceive mobile payments to be convenient, fast, safe and affordable, but expressed concerns about their technical know-how, delays in conducting a transaction due to unreliable network connectivity and the risk of phone loss or theft.• In both countries, airtime bonuses, gift items (such as mobile phones and branded T-shirts) and cash back e-floats were noted by cassava farmers as the most preferred incentives for using mobile money services.The cassava value-chain is dominated by smallholder farmers and the following recommendations are proposed to drive further uptake of mobile money services:• Interventions are needed to encourage youth into cassava farming. Given the aging population of cassava farmers in both countries, more youth need to be encouraged into the industry. Youth are also more likely to take up technologies such as mobile money services.• Campaigns to increase awareness of mobile money are needed. More cassava farmers are using mobile money in Ghana than in Nigeria, despite a higher level of education and technical know-how among Nigerian farmers. Awareness of the technology, however, through radio, television and word of mouth was higher in Ghana, suggesting that awareness is critical to uptake.• Mobile money operators should collaborate with agribusiness to strengthen their agent and merchant networks where farmers live and work. Agents should be equipped to train farmers who interact with them in order to improve their understanding and use of mobile money services. In addition, agent liquidity is critical if farmers are to find mobile money services more attractive.• Education programmes on mobile money use are needed. Educating farmers about the features and benefits of mobile money will build their capacity, confidence and trust in using these services.• Provide incentives for using mobile money services. The cassava farmers interviewed in both countries agreed that incentives would entice them to use these services.","tokenCount":"6309"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0088886949.json b/data/part_1/0088886949.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2566497205ed04fa0410a30c06ba892c1e73fa71 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0088886949.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f4596f15897db90558070bd23573da4f","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/badfb687-b505-4f45-921b-9f62727be34c/content","id":"801578130"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"4a642e6a-83f2-4cd7-896d-3318ca197a3c","pagecount":"122","content":"CIMMYT is an internationally funded, nonprofit scientific research and training organization. Headquartered in Mexico, the Center is engaged in a worldwide research program for maize, wheat, and triticale, with emphasis on improving the productivity of agricultural resources in developing countries. It is one of 13 nonprofit international agricultural research and training centers supported by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), which is sponsored by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank), and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The CGIAR consists of a combination of 40 donor countries, international and regional organizations, and private foundations.CIMMYT receives core support through the CGIAR from a number of sources, including the international aid agencies of Australia,-----Tables Table 2.1Target varietal replacement to meet farmers' minimum requirements for yield increases (MRR = 100%). Table 2.2 Duration of resistance in wheat varieties to stripe and leaf rusts, Punjab, Pakistan, 1984. Table 2.3Proportion of wheat area sown to given varieties at five-year intervals (hypothetical data). Table 2.4Varieties released since 1965 and year banned for rust susceptibility, Punjab, Pakistan. Table 2.5Release of wheat varieties in the Punjab, 1955-84. Table 2.6Rate of varietal release in Pakistan and other countries. Table 2.7Extent and rate of diffusion of wheat varieties released in the Punjab, 1965-81. Table 2.8Indices of wheat varietal replacement in the Punjab of Pakistan, the Punjab of India, and northwestern Mexico, 1977-86. Table 2.9Measures of exposure of the wheat crop to a rust epidemic in the Punjab in recent years. Table 2.10 Percentage of total wheat area sown to a major variety at the farm level, 1985/86. Table 2.11 Regression results for vintage model for ISWYN data, Faisalabad, 1965-86. Table 2.12 Regression results for vintage model for normal season wheat varieties, Khanewal Seed Farm variety x planting date trial, 1980-86. Table 2.13 Estimates of annual wheat yield gains (%/yr) due to varietal improvement, ISWYN, Faisalabad, 1965-86. Table 2.14 Estimates of annual wheat yield gains (%/yr) due to varietal improvement, Khanewal Seed Farm, Pakistan, 1980-86. Table 3.1Estimates of percentage area planted to major wheat varieties in three zones of Pakistan, survey of farmers and breeders' survey, 1985/86.-Table 3.2 Percentage area planted to major wheat varieties in the Punjab, 1985/86 and 1986/87.Table 3.3 Percentage area planted to major wheat varieties in the ricewheat survey area, 1985-89.Table 3.4 Percentage area planted to major wheat varieties in the cottonwheat survey area, 1985-89. Price of certified wheat seed, NWFP.Table 5.1 Seed depot density (retail seed outlets per 100,000 ha of wheat).Table 5.2 Sources of wheat seed of new varieties and other popular varieties currently planted, rice zone.Table 5.3 Sources of wheat seed of new varieties and other popular varieties currently planted, cotton zone.Table 5.4 Sources of wheat seed of new varieties and other popular varieties currently planted, Mardan. Farm size and percentage farmers using new varieties who initially got wheat seed from seed depotJresearchiextension.Type of farmer from whom seed of new wheat variety was obtained.Distance to farmers providing seed of new wheat varieties.Percentage of farmers who knew seed depot location and had visited a depot.In wheat growing areas, slow replacement of older varieties with newer ones in farmers' fields delays the transfer of benefits from breeding research to farmers and heightens the risk of disease epidemics, especially when the diversity of varieties in an area is limited. Determining the optimal time period in which farmers should replace older varieties and understanding which factors in the seed system may impede rapid varietal replacement are vital to bringing the gains of breeding research to fanners' fields.During the post-Green Revolution period, yield gains attained in wheat through genetic improvement have been about 0.75% per year, although there is a certain variability around trend. At this rate of yield gain it will pay fanners to change varieties every four years, given reasonable assumptions about current levels of many of the parameters influencing their choices. Differences in microenvironments, different lengths of time between periods of actual yield gains, and fluctuations in observable rust losses mean that in some cases the desired period for farmers to change varieties could be longer.In Pakistan since the Green Revolution in wheat, varietal replacement has been slow compared to areas with similar ecological circumstances, such as the Punjab ofIndia and northwestern Mexico. Furthermore, wide areas in Pakistan are often dominated by a single variety and diversity occurs only during the transition from one dominant variety to another. In the Punjab from 1977 to 1986, the proportion of wheat area planted to varieties that are no longer recommended because of rust susceptibility averaged over 40%, and from 1982 to 1986 the area planted to varieties with leaf rust ratings of 50S or higher was nearly 60% of the total area. Apart from the losses that could be caused by an epidemic, annual losses in yield to rust are also serious. They are not widely reported but may add up to a substantial annual loss.To examine the dynamics of the varietal replacement problem in Pakistan, four complementary studies were designed to analyze the wheat varietal and seed system from the breeding of new lines to adoption by farmers . The studies focus on the Punjab, which contains 71% of Pakistan's total wheat area and 75% of all the irrigated wheat area in Pakistan, because relatively more data are available and the seed system is most developed. Both the methods and results of this research should be useful to researchers outside of Pakistan who are seeking a framework for analyzing the interrelated problems of slow varietal replacement, limited varietal diversity, and ineffective seed systems.The first study examines the problem of slow varietal replacement from the perspective of the research system. It considers measures of varietal replacement and spatial diversification and applies them to the Punjab. These measures are used to investigate whether there is an optimal rate of varietal replacement and to assess the level of disease exposure. Other measures for assessing the progress of a wheat breeding program are also presented, including the rate of release of new varieties and the rate of yield gain over time attributable to the development of new varieties.It appears that in the Punjab varietal replacement has been much slower than a reasonable target-----once every five or six years--and the area planted to rust susceptible varieties has been unacceptably high (over 50% of the Punjab's wheat area in the first half of the 1980s).The second study assesses problems in obtaining basic data on the area covered by different varieties. Since varietal monitoring competes with many other agricultural data collection needs, any large scale estimation of varietal coverage is likely to be a byproduct of surveys designed for other purposes. Physical identification of varieties by skilled personnel is quite expensive, so usually identification depends on the statements of farmers, who may not always know varietal names or may identify cultivars incorrectly. Cluster sampling designs tend to create large standard errors in estimates of varietal coverage because variances within the primary sampling units (e.g. villages) tend to be lower than variances across the primary units.The third study concentrates on seed multiplication and marketing by the Punjab Seed Corporation (PSC). Data are presented on past and current seed production and the present seed marketing network in the Punjab. The PSC has effected a clear increase in production capacity for wheat seed in the Punjab. In the late 1960s and early 1970s, before the PSC was established, on average only a little more than 16,000 t of seed were sold each year. In the five years after it was established, the PSC raised production from 4,000 to 44,000 t, where it has remained since. Even in North West Frontier Province (NWFP), where there is no specialized seed production industry, the ability to produce wheat seed has advanced: the Agricultural Development Authority (ADA) in NWFP procures 3,000-4,000 Uyr. Formerly much of this seed came from the Punjab; in 1986/87 all of it came from NWFP.Major problems remain in planning seed production and in promoting and marketing seed. The early stages of seed multiplication could be speeded up, but the seed authorities cannot be sure which varieties to multiply. Production is not expanded because the PSC cannot sell the additional seed that is procured. The goal for marketing wheat seed appears to be to supply pure certified seed to fanners, rather than to facilitate the rapid replacement of varieties. The evidence suggests that fanners use the formal seed system more to change varieties than to get new seed of varieties they already grow. Nevertheless, an active seed network, closely linked with both agricultural research and extension, is a prerequisite for more rapid varietal replacement in the post-Green Revolution period.The commission paid to private dealers for handling seed is much less than for fertilizer, an input in greater and more regular demand. Hence seed is the input whose distribution at the fann level is still largely handled by the public sector. Very little effort is made by the seed industry to promote its product.Greater promotional effort, a wider distribution network, and higher commissions to dealers are necessary to spread new seed more rapidly. These changes will probably require an increase in seed price. Though higher seed prices will reduce farmers' demand for seed in the short term, the net effect could be more rapid varietal replacement if higher prices lead to more promotion and a better distribution network, and so reduce the amount of time before new varieties reach the farmers. The Punjab of India has both higher wheat seed prices and faster varietal replacement than the Punjab of Pakistan.The fourth study concentrates on farmers' perceptions. Just one-quarter to one-half of farmers sampled in three major cropping systems thought some wheat varieties were more disease resistant than others. Only one-quarter or fewer farmers thought resistant varieties could lose their resistance.Farmers' awareness of new wheat varieties was best explained in the rice-wheat zone of the Punjab, where the diffusion of new varieties has proceeded the farthest.In this zone awareness of new wheat varieties is positively influenced by education, extension contact, and location in a village where many fields are planted to new varieties. Some of these variables, notably education or literacy, as well as village factors, are influential in the other surveyed zones, the Punjab cotton-wheat area and irrigated Mardan, NWFP.In the presence of other variables, farm size usually becomes a less significant determinant of varietal awareness or adoption in areas where new varieties have spread the farthest . Smaller farmers will adopt new varieties once they are aware of them, but large farmers are more likely to become aware earlier because of their higher literacy and better contact with extension and other sources of information. One noticeable way in which farm size is important in all areas is that large farmers are more likely to plant both old and new varieties rather than to specialize in one or the other. Small farmers who do adopt a new variety are more likely to plant all their wheat area to that variety.Yield was by far the most common reason stated by farmers in all three zones for changing varieties. Most farmers simply believed that the yield of the new variety was superior, although a few farmers related this perceived yield advantage to reduced yield in their old varieties because of disease or other factors . In multivariate analysis, farmers' perception that new varieties yield better is usually the strongest factor influencing adoption. Performance at late planting dates is also important, particularly in the cotton zone.In the three sampled areas in 1985/86, when all the sampled farmers' wheat fields were considered, 50-60% were planted with retained seed. An additional 20-30% were planted with seed obtained from neighboring farmers. Farmer-to-farmer transfer is clearly a major method of varietal diffusion. Some 45-55% of the farmers in all three zones who were planting post-1978 releases initially got seed from other farmers. Of fanners planting new varieties, over 33% in the rice-wheat zone, 50% in the cotton-wheat zone, but only 14% in Mardan initially got seed from the depot.In all three zones, literacy and extension contact were the two variables most likely to be related significantly and positively to correct knowledge of where the seed depot was located. Distance from the seed depot may have been related negatively in the Punjab to knowledge of the depot's location . In the Punjab, farmers aware of new varieties were also more likely to be aware of the seed depot; in NWFP there was no relationship, confirming the relative lack of importance of the seed depot in Mardan in spreading new varieties.Only 40-50% of the fanners in all three zones who used their own seed managed it through techniques such as selecting a special field or threshing seed separately from grain. Very few significant relationships existed between farmer characteristics and seed management.Extension contact was not very important in explaining awareness and adoption of new varieties. Varietal demonstrations by the extension service have probably not been spread widely enough and have not always been tailored to different agroecological circumstances or cropping system constraints. The promotional efforts of research, the seed industry, and extension have not been well coordinated.Taken together, the results of all four studies emphasize the importance of regular varietal replacement for fanners and for the nation of Pakistan. The methods used in this research-institutional analysis, analysis of research data, and farmer surveY5---{)ffer a means to evaluate the complex relationships between wheat breeding, varietal testing, and release; seed production and distribution; extension; government policy; and varietal change at the farmer level. Although the conclusions presented in this report are specific to a particular crop, place, and time, they may also be viewed as hypotheses that in some cases might be applicable in different situations, perhaps after modification.Future studies to expand knowledge of factors relating to varietal replacement might develop methods for detennining rough objectives for the number and genetic diversity of varieties to be released by mature plant breeding programs in countries with large areas planted to the crop in question. More case studies of seed systems with different degrees of success in marketing seed of different crops would also be useful. Such studies do exist; what is needed is to add the perspective of varietal replacement to the legal and institutional description they often contain. Additional research is also required to verify empirically the relative strengths of the factors influencing fanners' demand for replacement seed. Finally, studies of other countries and particularly of other crops would sharpen our understanding of the features of varietal replacement that are universal and of the changes in assumptions and methods necessary to analyze factors more specific to time, place, and particular crops .En las zonas productoras de trigo, la sustitución lenta de las variedades más viejas por las nuevas en los campos de los agricultores retrasa la transferencia de los beneficios de la investigación fitotécnica a los agricultores e intensifica el riesgo de que se presenten epifitias, en especial cuando es limitada la diversidad genética de las variedades cultivadas en la zona. La determinación del período óptimo después del cual los agricultores deben reemplazar sus variedades y la comprensión de los factores del sistema de producción de semilla que pueden impedir la rápida sustitución de las variedades son esenciales en la transferencia de los beneficios de la investigación a los agricultores.En el período después de la Revolución Verde, los aumentos del rendimiento de trigo que se han logrado mediante el mejoramiento genético han alcanzado cerca del 0.75% anual, aunque existe cierto grado de variabilidad en la tendencia. A ese ritmo de aumento, les conviene a los agricultores cambiar las variedades cada cuatro años, con base en suposiciones razonables sobre los niveles actuales de muchos de los parámetros que influyen en sus opciones. Las diferencias en los micro-ambientes, los intervalos variables entre los períodos en que se dan los aumentos del rendimiento y las fluctuaciones en las pérdidas observables causadas por la roya, significan que, en algunos casos, el período más conveniente para que los agricultores cambien sus variedades podría ser más largo.que buscan un marco de referencia para el análisis de los problemas interrelacionados que surgen de un reemplazo lento de variedades, poca diversidad de variedades cultivadas y sistemas de producción de semilla ineficaces.En el primer estudio se examina el problema del reemplazo lento de variedades desde el punto de vista del sistema de investigación, y además se consideran las formas de medir el reemplazo de variedades y su diversificación temporal y espacial, y se aplican al Punjab. Estas mediciones se usan para averiguar si existe un ritmo óptimo de reemplazo de variedades y para evaluar el nivel de exposición a las enfermedades. Se presentan también otras mediciones que se usan para evaluar el progreso de un programa de mejoramiento de trigo, entre ellas, la tasa de lanzamiento de nuevas variedades y la tasa de aumento del rendimiento a lo largo del tiempo que puede atribuirse al desarrollo de variedades nuevas. En el Punjab, la sustitución de variedades ha sido mucho más lenta de lo que se considera razonable -cinco o seis años-y la superficie que se cultiva con variedades susceptibles a la roya ha sido demasiado extensa (más del 50% de la superficie de trigo del Punjab en la primera mitad del decenio de 1980).El segundo estudio evalúa los problemas de obtener datos básicos sobre la superficie que se siembra con las distintas variedades. Como la observación de las variedades que se cultivan compite con muchas otras necesidades de recolección de datos, cualquier estimación en gran escala de la superficie cultivada suele derivarse de encuestas que se realizaron con otros propósitos. La identificación física de las variedades por personal especializado resulta muy costosa y, por tanto, suele hacerse con base en lo que dicen los agricultores, quienes no siempre conocen los nombres de las variedades y a veces las identifican incorrectamente. Los diseños de muestro en conglomerados tienden a crear grandes errores estándar en las estimaciones de la superficie sembrada con cada variedad porque la varianza dentro de las unidades primarias de muestreo (por ejemplo, las aldeas) tiende a ser menor que la varianza a través de esas unidades.El tercer estudio se centra en la multiplicación y comercialización de semilla por la Empresa de Semilla de Pakistán (Punjab Seed Corporation, PSC). Se presentan datos sobre la producción actual y anterior de semilla, así como sobre la presente red de comercialización de semilla en el Punjab. Es evidente que la PSC ha logrado aumentar la capacidad de producir semilla de trigo en el Punjab. A fines de los 60 y principios de los 70, antes de que se estableciera la PSC, se vendía cada año un promedio de poco más de 16,000 t de semilla. En los primeros cinco años después de su creación, la PSC incrementó la producción de 4,000 a 44,000 t, Y ese nivel se ha mantenido desde entonces. Incluso en la Provincia de la Frontera del Noroeste (North West Frontier Province, NWFP), donde no existe una industria especializada de producción de semilla, la capacidad de producir semilla ha aumentado, pues la Autoridad de Desarrollo Agrícola en la NWFP adquiere entre 3,000 y 4,000 t/año. Anteriormente, la mayor parte de la semilla provenía del Punjab; en 1986/87, casi toda procedió de la NWFP.-Siguen existiendo problemas en la planificación de la producción de semilla y la promoción y comercialización de la misma. Quizá fuera posible acelerar las primeras etapas de la multiplicación, pero las autoridades no están seguras cuáles variedades deben multiplicarse. La producción no aumenta porque la PSC no puede vender el excedente de semilla que se produce. El objetivo de la comercialización de semilla parece ser suministrar semilla pura y certificada al agricultor, no facilitar la sustitución rápida de variedades. Las pruebas sugieren que los agricultores utilizan el sistema formal de semilla más para cambiar sus variedades que para obtener semilla nueva de las variedades que ya cultivan. No obstante, se requeriría un sistema activo de producción de semilla que tuviera nexos cercanos con la investigación y la extensión para lograr una reposición más rápida de variedades en el período posterior a la Revolución Verde. .La comisión que reciben los distribuidores privados por el manejo de la semilla es mucho menor que la que se les paga por vender fertilizante, un insumo que tiene una demanda mayor y más regular. Por tanto, la semilla es un insumo cuya distribución a nivel de fincas todavía es efectuada por el sector público. La industria privada hace muy poco esfuerzo para promover su producto.Para difundir la semilla nueva más rápidamente, son necesarios un mayor esfuerzo promocional, una red de distribución más extensa y una comisión más elevada para los distribuidores. Estos cambios probablemente requerirán que se incremente el precio de la semilla. Aunque un precio más alto reducirá a corto plazo la demanda de semilla entre los agricultores, el efecto neto podría ser un reemplazo de variedades más rápido, siempre que los precios más altos condujeran a una mayor promoción, a una mejor red de distribución y, por tanto, a una reducción del tiempo necesario para que las nuevas variedades lleguen al agricultor. En el Punjab de la India, los precios del trigo son mayores y hay un reemplazo de variedades más acelerado que en el Punjab de Pakistán.El cuarto estudio examina las percepciones de los agricultores. Sólo una tercera o cuarta parte de los agricultores encuestados en los tres principales sistemas de cultivo opinaron que algunas variedades eran más resistentes a las enfermedades que otras, y sólo una cuarta parte o menos pensaba que las variedades podían perder su resistencia.La razón de que los agricultores conocieran las nuevas variedades fue más clara en la zona del Punjab donde se cultiva arroz y trigo, y donde la difusión de las nuevas variedades ha sido extensa. En esta zona, el conocimiento de las nuevas variedades se ve influido por el nivel de educación, el contacto con los servicios de extensión y el hecho de vivir en una aldea donde muchas parcelas se siembran con estas variedades. Algunas de estas variables, en especial el nivel de educación o escolaridad y los factores relacionados con la aldea, también tienen influencia en otras zonas encuestadas, como la zona productora de algodón y trigo del Punjab y la región irrigada de Mardan, NWFP.Frente a otras variables, el tamaño de la finca suele ser una determinante menos importante del conocimiento o adopción de variedades en aquellos lugares donde las nuevas variedades se han extendido más. El pequeño agricultor adoptará las variedades nuevas una vez que las conoce, pero los grandes agricultores son los que suelen enterarse primero, por su mayor nivel de escolaridad y su contacto más asiduo con la extensión y otras fuentes de información. El tamaño de la finca es importante en todas las zonas en el sentido de que los grandes productores tienden a sembrar tanto variedades viejas como nuevas, sin especializarse en ninguna. Los pequeños agricultores que adoptan una nueva variedad por lo general cultivan con ella todas las tierras que dedican al trigo .La razón más común que dieron los agricultores en las tres zonas de cambiar variedades fue el rendimiento. La mayoria de ellos creía que el rendimiento de las nuevas variedades era superior, pese a que unos cuantos percibieron que este aumento del rendimiento sobre los rendimientos reducidos de sus antiguas variedades tenía que ver con la resistencia a las enfermedades y otros factores. En el análisis multivariado, por lo general el factor que más influye en la adopción es la percepción de los agricultores de que las nuevas variedades rinden más, aunque también es importante su comportamiento cuando se usan fechas de siembra tardías, sobre todo en la zona algodonera.En las tres zonas encuestadas en 1985/86, el 50 ó 60% de todos los campos de los agricultores encuestados se sembraron con semilla reservada de la cosecha anterior. Otro 20 ó 30% se cultivó con semilla obtenida de agricultores vecinos. Es evidente que la transferencia de agricultor a agricultor constituye un medio importante de difusión. En las tres zonas, entre el 45 y 55% de los agricultores que sembraban variedades lanzadas después 1978 habían conseguido inicialmente semilla de otros agricultores. De los productores que sembraban variedades nuevas, obtuvieron inicialmente semilla del depósito más del 33% en la zona productora de arroz y trigo, pero sólo el 14% de los que viven en Mardan.En las tres zonas, la escolaridad y el contacto con los servicios de extensión fueron las dos variables que más se relacionaron en forma positiva y significativa con el conocimiento correcto de dónde se localizaba el depósito de semilla. Es posible que en el Punjab la distancia del depósito estuviera negativamente relacionada con el conocimiento de dónde se encuentra éste. En el Punjab, los agricultores que conoCÍan las variedades nuevas también eran los que probablemente sabían dónde quedaba el depósito; en Mardan no hubo tal relación, lo cual confirma la falta relativa de importancia del depósito de semilla en la difusión dé las variedades nuevas.En las tres zonas, sólo el 40 ó 50% de los agricultores que siembran su propia semilla utilizan técnicas como la selección de una parcela especial o la trilla por separado de la semilla y el grano. Hubo muy pocas relaciones significativas entre las características del agricultor y el manejo de la semilla.-El contacto con los servicios de extensión no fue una causa muy importante del conocimiento y adopción de las variedades nuevas. Las demostraciones de las variedades por los servicios de extensión quizá no se han difundido lo suficiente y además no siempre se han adecuado a las distintas circunstancias agrecológicas o factores adversos de los sistemas de cultivo. Por otra parte, no se han coordinado bien los esfuerzos de promoción de la investigación, la industria semillera y los servicios de extensión.En conjunto, los resultados de los cuatro estudios realzan la importancia que tiene el reemplazo regular de variedades para los agricultores y para todo Pakistán. Los métodos que se usaron en esta investigación -análisis institucional, análisis de los datos de la investigación y encuestas entre los agricultores-ofrecen un medio de evaluar las complejas relaciones entre el fitomejoramiento de trigo, la verificación y el lanzamiento de las variedades, la producción y distribución de semillas, la extensión, las políticas gubernamentales y los cambios de variedades que hacen los productores. Si bien las conclusiones que se presentan en este informe son específicamente de un cultivo, un lugar y un período determinados, se les puede considerar también como hipótesis que se podrían aplicar en distintas situaciones, quizá con alguna modificación.En el futuro, en los estudios realizados para ampliar el conocimiento de los factores que afectan el reemplazo de las variedades, se podrían crear métodos para establecer el número aproximado de variedades que serán lanzadas por los programas fitotécnicos más avanzados de países con grandes zonas productoras del cultivo en cuestión, y la diversidad genética que esas variedades deberán poseer. Asimismo, sería muy útil un mayor número de estudios de los sistemas de semilla que han logrado cierto nivel de eficacia en comercializar semillas de distintos cultivos. De hecho, existe ya este tipo de estudios; lo que habría que hacer es agregar la perspectiva del reemplazo de variedades a la descripción legal e institucional que a menudo contienen. También es necesario realizar más investigaciones para verificar empíricamente el efecto relativo de los factores que influyen en la demanda de semilla para reemplazar variedades por parte de los agricultores. Por último, estudios de otros países y en especial, de otros cultivos, mejorarían nuestro entendimiento de los aspectos del reemplazo de variedades que son universales, y de los cambios en las suposiciones y métodos que son necesarios para analizar factores más específicos respecto al tiempo, al lugar y a determinados cultivos.En raison même de la lenteur avec laquelle s'effectue dans les exploitations agricoles des contrées productrices de blé la substitution des plus anciennes variétés par de nouvelles , les agriculteurs ne bénéficient qu'avec retard des résultats de la recherche en phytotechnie et sont, de plus, exposés au risque de voir se présenter des épidémies, notamment quand la diversité génétique des variétés cultivées dans la région est limitée. Pour que les agriculteurs puissent effectivement profiter des résultats de la recherche, il faut avant tout déterminer la période optimale pour le remplacement des variétés qu'ils cultivent et bien connaître les facteurs du système de production de la semence susceptibles de faire obstacle à une rapide substitution des variétés.A la suite de la Révolution Verte, les augmentations de rendement en blé obtenues à la faveur de l'amélioration génétique ont été de près de 0,75 % par an, encore que cette tendance n'ait pas été uniforme partout. Une telle augmentation suggère qu'il est de l'intérêt des agriculteurs de changer de variétés tous les quatre ans, sur la base de suppositions rainsonnables quant aux niveaux actuels de nombreux paramètres qui influencent leurs décisions. Les différences de microenvironnement, la variabilité des intervalles entre les périodes de meilleur rendement et les fluctuations des pertes occasionnées par la rouille font que, dans certains cas, les agriculteurs devront prolonger la période précédant le changement des variétés . Les quatre études complémentaires dont on trouvera ici le compte rendu ont pour objet l'analyse des problèmes associés au remplacement de variétés dans la culture du blé dans un seul pays, le Pakistan. Les systèmes de substitution de variétés et de production de semence y sont examinés, depuis l'obtention de nouvelles lignées jusqu'à l'adoption de ces dernières par las agriculteurs. Les recherches ont été principalement centrées sur le Punjab dont les cultures de blé couvrent 71% de la superficie totale des terres ensemencées en blé au Pakistan et 75 % des terres de blé irriguées du pays. Les informations concernant cette zone sont relativement plus abondantes et le système de production de semence y est plus développé. Néanmoins, les méthodes et résultats de cette recherche pourront être utiles aux chercheurs qui, en dehors du Pakistan même, ont besoin d'un cadre de référence pour l'étude de ------problèmes qui peuvent se présenter en liaison avec une lente substitution de variétés, une faible diversité des variétés cultivées et des systèmes de production de semence déficients.La première étude est consacrée au problème de la substitution tardive de variétés du point de vue du système de recherche; de plus, les diverses manières de mesurer le remplacement de variétés et leur diversification dans le temps et dans l'espace, appliquées au Punjab, y sont exposées. Ces méthodes de mesure servent à déterminer si il existe un rythme optimal pour la substitution de variétés et à évaluer le degré de vulnérabilité de ces dernières aux maladies. D'autres types de mesures sont également proposés pour évaluer l'avance d'un programme d'amélioration du blé, tels le taux de lancement de nouvelles variétés et le taux d'augmentation du rendement pendant la période requise pour que se développent de nouvelles variétés. Au Punjab, la substitution de variétés a été beaucoup plus lente qu'ont pouvait raisonnablement l'espérer -de 5 ou 6 ans -et la culture de variétés sensibles à la rouille s'est étendue sur une très grande superficie (plus de 50% des terres à blé du Punjab pendant les premières années 80).La deuxième étude traite des problèmes que pose l'obtention de données relatives à la superficie des terres ensemencées avec diverses variétés. L'observation des variétés cultivées coïncide souvent avec la nécessité de recueillir d'autres types de données, de sorte que toute estimation globale de la superficie cultivée provient souvent d'enquêtes menées dans une toute autre perspective. L'identification de visu des variétés cultivées par un personnel spécialisé étant fort onéreuse, il faut se fier généralement aux dires des agriculteurs, lesquels ne connaissent pas toujours les noms des variétés et parfois ne les identifient pas correctement. Les échantillonnages issus d'ensembles de cultures peuvent induire une grande erreur standard dans l'estimation de la superficie cultivée avec chaque variété, du fait que la variance dans les unités primaires d'échantillonnage (les villages, par exemple) tend à être inférieure à la variance globale de ces unités.La troisième étude porte sur la multiplication et la commercialisation des semences par la société de production de semence au Pakistan (Punjab Seed Corporation, PSC). Les chiffres correspondant à la production antérieure et à la production actuelle sont présenté, ainsi que les données relatives au réseau de commercialisation des semences au Punjab. De toute évidence la PSC a élevé la production de semence de blé au Punjab. A la fin des années 1960 et durant les premières années 1970, avant que soit créée la PSC, les ventes annuelles de semences dépassaient à peine 16000 tonnes en moyenne. Au cours des cinq premières années d'activité, la PSC a porté la production de 4 000 à 44 000 tonnes et l'a maintenue à ce niveau, y compris dans la Province de la Frontière du Nord-Ouest (Northwest Frontier Province, NWFP) où il n'existe pas d'industrie spécialisée dans la production de semences, la capacité de production a augmenté et l'Autorité de développement agricole de la NWFP acquiert 3 000 à 4 000 tonnes par an. Auparavant, la majeure partie de la semence provenait du Punjab, mais dès 1986/87 elle a été fournie presque en totalité par la NWFP.Des problemes importants subsistent dans la planification de la production de la semence, de même que dans la promotion et la commercialisation. Peut-être serait-il possible de faciliter les premières étapes de la multiplication, mais les autorités ne savent pas exactement quelles sont les variétés qu'il serait bon de multiplier. La production n'augmente pas parce que la PSC ne peut vendre l'excédent de sa production. Fournir à l'agriculteur une semence pure et dûment certifiée semble être le premier objectif en matière de commercialisation et non faciliter la substitution rapide de variétés. Apparemment les agriculteurs ont plus recours au système officiel pour changer de variété que pour obtenir de nouvelles semences de variétés qu'ils cultivent déjà. Néanmoins, un système de production de semence travaillant en étroite liaison avec les centres de recherche et les services de vulgarisation serait fort utile pour activer la substitution de variétés dans la période suivant la Révolution Verte.La commission que perçoivent les distributeurs privés dans le cadre de la commercialisation de semence est très inférieure à celle qui leur est accordée pour la vente d'engrais, produit qui fait l'objet d'une demande plus important et plus régulière. De ce fait, la distribution de semence au niveau des exploitations agricoles est effectuée par le secteur public. L'industrie privée, pour sa part, ne fait pas grand effort pour promouvoir sa production.La diffusion plus rapide de semence nouvelle requiert une plus grande activité promotionnelle, un réseau de distribution plus étendu et l'octroi d'une commission plus élevée aux distributeurs. Sans doute ces modifications donneront-elles lieu à une majoration du prix de la semence laquelle, à court terme, motivera la réduction de la demande de la part des agriculteurs mais pourra, néanmoins, avoir pour effet l'accélération du remplacement de variétés, si toutefois cette hausse des prix favorise la promotion et l'extension du réseau de distribution, d'où une réduction du temps nécessaire pour que les nouvelles variétés soient mises à la disposition des agriculteurs. Au Punjab indien les prix du blé sont plus élevés et la substitution de variétés plus rapide qu'au Punjab pakistanais.Le point de vue des agriculteurs fait l'objet de la quatrième étude. Un tiers ou un quart seulement des agriculteurs auprès desquels ont eu lieu les enquêtes dans les trois principaux systèmes de culture considéraient que certaines variétés étaient plus résistantes que d'autres aux maladies, et un quart d'entre eux -peut-être même moins -pensait que les variétés pouvaient perdre leur résistance. ----- Dans les études effectuées à l'avenir en vue de faire conaître mieux les facteurs qui entravent la substitution de variétés, des méthodes pourraient être proposées pour établir le nombre approximatif des variétés issues des programmes d'amélioration les plus avancés de pays producteurs où les cultures de blé couvrent de grandes surfaces, ainsi que la diversité génétique que devraient présenter ces variétés. De même, il serait fort utile de mener de plus nombreuses études sur les systèmes de production de semence qui ont prouvé une certaine efficacité dans la commercialisation de semence de diverses cultures. En fait, ce type d'études existe déjà, mais il serait souhaitable qu'elles ne soient pas limitées à la description légale et institutionnelle qu'elles contiennent le plus souvent et qu'elles soient conçues dans la perspective du remplacement de variétés. Il serait également nécessaire de procéder à des recherches qui auraient pour objet de vérifier de façon empirique l'influence des facteurs qui interviennent dans la demande de semence des agriculteurs désireux de remplacer certaines variétés. Enfin, des études émanant d'autres pays et portant sur d'autres cultures nous pennettraient de mieux connaître les aspects universels de cette substitution de variétés et les changements à apporter tant aux suppositions qu'aux méthodes nécessaires pour analyser des facteurs plus spécifiques en ce qui concerne le temps, le lieu et des cultures déterminées.Paul W. HeiseyThe speed with which new varieties are released and diffused to the farming population is an important factor influencing the benefits realized from plant breeding. Diffusion of new varieties ensures continuing increases in productivity through the increased yield potential of new varieties; it reduces the time lapse from the investment in research to the time the benefits are realized, thereby increasing the returns to research; and it helps maintain genetic resistance to diseases and pests.The last benefit is particularly important in wheat. The resistance of released varieties often breaks down within a few years because pathogens, especially of leaf rust (Puccinia recondita) and stripe rust (P. striiformis), are continually evolving. To guard against loss when varietal resistance breaks down, it is useful to diversify varieties 1) over time, by rapidly replacing the varieties available to farmers, and 2) at a given point in time, by ensuring the availability of several varieties with different sources of genetic resistance to the dominant pathogens so that farmers can plant several varieties and reduce the risk of losses, or change varieties quickly if an epidemic breaks out. Varietal replacement over time and varietal diversification at a given point in time are both important targets of any program to develop and diffuse new wheat varieties.Pakistan is one country in which varietal replacement has been slow. Though farmers quickly adopted semidwarf wheats at the time of the Green Revolution, since then varietal change has lagged compared with similar wheat-growing environments such as the Indian Punjab and northwestern Mexico. Wheat researchers have been aware of the problem of slow varietal replacement for some time. Pathologists, plant breeders, and other scientists have warned that a rust epidemic similar to the one that occurred in 1977178 is likely to occur. However, the exact dimensions of the problem could not be determined; although some information on area planted to specific varieties is collected in Pakistan, at least for the Punjab, data are not made available publicly or in a timely fashion.In the early 1980s, the Pakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC)lInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) Collaborative Wheat Project, in cooperation with provincial research institutes, undertook a program of \"integrated research in farmers' fields in areas representing dominant cropping systems in which wheat is grown in Pakistan\" (Byerlee et al. 1986). As part of this program, agronomic-economic surveys were used to diagnose farmers' wheat production problems and to set priorities for research (Byerlee et al. 1984, Hussain et al. 1985, and Akhter et al. 1986a; Figure 1.1 shows the survey areas). The surveys discovered that large areas of wheat in northern Pakistan were planted to old, rust-susceptible varieties. According to these researchers, variety is an important factor affecting farmers' yields and is also among the factors given the highest priority for immediate technology transfer.These findings emphasized the need to develop methods and conduct research to understand the problem of limited varietal diversification and replacement more thoroughly. Additional research was warranted for many reasons. Seed is a basic but relatively uncomplicated and inexpensive component of wheat production technology.The contrast between the rapid initial adoption of high yielding varieties and the present slow rate of varietal replacement, and between rates of varietal replacement in Pakistan and in other countries, certainly suggested further study. Economic losses caused by disease in normal years in Pakistan, let alone the losses that could be incurred in an epidemic, are severe enough to make the subject of varietal replacement a serious policy issue. Pakistan was therefore a good location for exploring these issues in greater depth .The results presented in this report come from four complementary studies designed to analyze the wheat seed system in Pakistan from the development of new lines by researchers to adoption by farmers. The report focuses on the Punjab, which contains 71 % of Pakistan's total wheat area and 75% of all the irrigated wheat area in Pakistan, because relatively more data are available and the seed system is most developed.Baluchistan -----The first study, summarized in Chapter 2, analyzes slow varietal replacement from the perspective of the research system. Measures of varietal replacement and spatial diversification are presented and used to investigate whether there is an optimal rate of varietal replacement in the Punjab and to assess the level of disease exposure. Other measures of assessing the progress of a wheat breeding program are also discussed, including the rate of release of new varieties and the rate of yield gain over time attributable to the development of new varieties.The second study, most of which is presented in Chapter 3, assesses problems in obtaining the raw data on varietal coverage required for much of the subsequent analysis in this report. The study is the result of a series of special surveys conducted by social scientists from PARCo The surveys were designed to monitor wheat varietal coverage and change in the three cropping systems covered by the agronomic-economic diagnostic surveys.Chapter 4 discusses the third study, which concentrates on seed multiplication and marketing by the Punjab Seed Corporation (PSC). Data are presented on past and current seed production and the present seed marketing network in the Punjab.The fourth study, discussed in Chapters 5 and 6, concentrates on farmers. Chapter 5 looks specifically at farmers' seed sources and seed management, describing farmers' contacts with the formal seed system and the operation of the informal seed system. Chapter 6 concentrates on farmers' use of seed in the context of the literature on technology adoption. Farmers' perceptions of wheat technology in general, varieties in particular, and the wheat disease threat are presented and analyzed. Farmer characteristics are analyzed statistically for their effects on farmers' awareness and adoption of new varieties.The four studies presented in this report look explicitly at the research system, the formal seed system, the informal seed system, and the varietal monitoring system. The relationships between these systems and the rate of varietal replacement in farmers' fields is diagrammed in Figure 1.2. No separate analysis of agricultural extension is conducted. However, evidence of extension's role in varietal diffusion is available from the discussion of extension as a source of technological information and the effect of extension contact on farmers' awareness and adoption of new 1 varieties.The final chapter of this report presents some conclusions and recommendations aimed at varietal monitoring; wheat breeding, varietal testing, and release; seed production and distribution; extension; and government policy. Although the studies described in the pages that follow focus on the Punjab of Pakistan, the results and recommendations should be useful for all who are concerned with speeding the benefits of breeding research to its ultimate clients, the farmers.1 General evaluations of agricultural extension for the Punjab can be found in Khan et al. (1984) and Haq et al. (1986), and for Mardan in Freedman et al. (1986). -Derek Byerlee and Paul W. HeiseySeveral studies have analyzed the overall returns to wheat breeding research (e.g., Nagy 1984 andZentner andPeterson 1984). However, the concepts of a target or optimal rate of varietal replacement and of the degree of varietal diversification over space have received little attention, and appropriate measures to monitor replacement or diversification in farmers' fields also merit further study. This chapter addresses those issues, first by introducing some basic concepts and measures of varietal replacement and diversification, and then by applying them to recent trends in wheat varietal diffusion in the Punjab of Pakistan.Any plant breeding program will have an optimal time span during which new varieties are released and old ones are replaced. The length of this period depends on the benefits and costs of releasing new varieties. The benefits in turn depend on 1) the yearly genetic gains in yield or improvement in other desirable characteristics such as maturity, 2) the rate of varietal decay caused by breakdown in disease resistance, and 3) the genetic diversity for disease resistance in varieties that are currently grown. Because these factors, particularly the third one, change from year to year, the optimum period for varietal replacement will vary over time. The costs of replacement depend on the costs of breeding new varieties, multiplying seed of those varieties, providing extension to substitute new varieties for old ones in farmers' fields, and farmers' seed purchase and learning costs.All of those factors are quite specific to a given situation. The genetic gains in yield per year in a plant breeding program vary substantially. Annual yield gains may average 2% or more in exceptional periods, as in the 1960s and 1970s when the semidwarf character was widely exploited by wheat breeding programs, but over the long term, genetic yield gains are unlikely to average more than 1% annually (CIMMYT 1989).To make it worthwhile for a farmer to change varieties, some threshold yield increase--aside from the attractions of improved disease resistance and other superior characteristics that a new variety might have--is usually needed. The number of years before farmers should change varieties depends upon several factors, which are shown in Figure 2.1 and discussed in Heisey and Brennan (1989).•Ifwe make the simplifying assumption that farmers' seed does not deteriorate over time, we can use the yield threshold criterion in a straightforward manner.Assuming that the price of seed of a new variety is twice the price of seed of the old variety, and assuming a minimum marginal return on capital of 100% (CIMMYT 1988), the threshold yield increase would be between 7.5% and 10% for a base wheat yield of 2 tJha in farmers' fields. l If the annual rate of genetic gain in yield is 1%, a varietal replacement period of 8-10 years is implied. If breeding gains are more rapid, or base yields are higher, prices of seed of improved varieties lower, or if farmers' seed deteriorates, the desired varietal replacement period is considerably shorter.The period in which farmers should grow one variety before changing to another is shown for various assumptions in Table 2.1. The seed-to-grain price ratio of 1.5 reflects the current ratio of wheat seed to commercial grain in Pakistan; the ratio of 1. 75 is nearer the worldwide average. The base yield of 2 tJha is near current levels for irrigated wheat in the Punjab; the higher yield (comparable to farmers' yields in northwestern Mexico) illustrates the effects of a substantially higher base yield. Seed pricing does not affect varietal replacement so significantly when base yields are higher.2Another factor influencing the benefits of varietal replacement is the rate at which varieties decay as their disease resistance breaks down. The degree of longevity is obviously quite specific to a given variety and environment. Nonetheless, a recent review (Khan 1987) suggests that the life of a wheat variety before leaf rust and/or stripe rust resistance breaks down averages about five to six years in northern Pakistan (Table 2.2). In the highly favorable wheat growing environment of northwestern Mexico, where leaf rust is a major problem, the average longevity of a variety is only three to four years. Data summarized by Kilpatrick (1975) for many countries suggest that races of rust pathogens change on average about once every five years in wheat growing areas of the Third World. Because some cultural practices that increase yields also promote conditions for rust to occur, wheat varietal longevity is decreasing over time (Khan 1987).The longevity of new resistant wheat varieties also decreases if they are grown alongside susceptible varieties. The buildup of inoculum on susceptible materials is likely to raise the probability of a change in rust races (PARe 1987). In Queensland, Australia, wheat breeders noted that varietal longevity with regard to stem rust increased from about five to 10 years when nearly all farmers grew varieties resistant to the disease and the level of inoculum was kept low. Note : Assumes a minimum marginal rate of return (i.e., farmers' minimum return on capital) of 100%; also assumes that the ratio of price of seed of improved variety to price of seed of old variety (i.e., commercial grain price) is 1.50 or 1. 75; a seed rate of 100 kg/ha; no deterioration in farmers' seed; and inclusion of benefits in years subsequent to a change.2 For more discussion of the effects of the various parameters, see Heisey and Brennan (1989). But frequent varietal replacement also incurs costs, since it requires both a well-developed breeding program and an established seed multiplication, distribution, and extension system. Such a system should be able to provide sufficient seed of new varieties two to three years after their release, although limitations on seed multiplication can often increase this period to four years or more. The rate of diffusion is likely to be a function of improved yield or another superior characteristic of the new varieties, rather than disease resistance. However, in periods when yield gains are attained slowly in breeding programs, varietal replacement may have to be undertaken largely to protect against disease rather than to exploit new yield gains. In that case, the cost of extension to replace old, susceptible varieties may be quite high if farmers are unaware that the resistance of their varieties has broken down until a disease epidemic occurs.On the other hand, when new varieties clearly give higher yields, they may spread quite rapidly with little input from extension, as occurred when semidwarf wheats were first released (Lowdermilk 1972).The costs and benefits of varietal replacement in Pakistan suggest that wheat varieties should turn over every five to six years, which is somewhat longer than the target of three to five years set in Pakistan after the 1978 rust epidemic (Muhammad 1981). The five-to six-year target period would meet the hypothesized threshold at which it becomes profitable for farmers to change varieties and maintain rust resistance. The target period would also be practical, given the limitations in releasing, extending, and multiplying seed of new varieties.Even a target period of five to six years poses considerable challenges to plant breeders. For example, in the Punjab alone there are three varietal zones--irrigated southern Punjab (leaf rust zone ), irrigated northern Punjab (leaf rust and stripe rust zone), and the barani (rainfed) tract-as well as two distinct planting periods (normal and late) in the irrigated tracts. To meet a target replacement time of five to six years in all zones, one new variety should be released each year. Some varieties are adapted across zones, thereby reducing the number of varieties needed, but this advantage is countered by the fact that some varieties are not accepted by farmers or are grown on only a negligible area.Assuming that varietal diversification reflects genetic diversity, varietal diversification over space is desirable mainly to reduce the risk to farmers and to a nation should a rust epidemic occur. If a susceptible variety covers only a minor proportion of the planted area, losses in the year of an epidemic are reduced, and in the next year the variety can be replaced more quickly and cheaply than if it had been planted on a wider area. Replacing a susceptible variety grown on half or more of the planted area usually takes more than one year and requires an accelerated program to procure and distribute seed. Large-scale seed imports may even be necessary, as during the rust epidemic in Pakistan in 1978.To actually reduce the risk of an epidemic, diversification must be practiced at the field level, perhaps by planting multilines or varietal mixtures in a given field. 3 There is some difference of opinion over whether planting adjacent fields with genetically different material slows the spread of disease, but plant pathologists generally agree that diversification above the field level will probably not influence the rate at which a rust epidemic spreads.To monitor both the impact of a plant breeding program and exposure to rust epidemics, some measures of varietal replacement and diversification are needed.Measures used in other studies are reviewed here and some are applied to the situation in Pakistan. Examples are sometimes calculated using hypothetical data from Table 2.3. 3 A multiline is a mixture of phenotypically similar plants that have different genes for rust resistance. A multiline could be developed by crossing a variety to a series of varieties with different sources of resistance and then backcrossing to the original variety to regain phenotype. However, each component of a multiline or varietal mixture must be tested to ensure it has at least one resistance gene that is different from those in the other components of the mixture/multiline...Many different measures of varietal replacement have been proposed, beginning with an index developed by Johnson and Gustafson (1963). Some of the more important measures are discussed by Brennan (1984) and Brennan and Byerlee (1989). The two measures used in this study are the proportion of recent varieties and the weighted average age of varieties; they are analyzed in the sections that follow.Proportion of recent varieties-This index (Brennan 1984) is quite simple to construct. If we use a five-year period for varietal replacement, then this index, Nt' is simply the proportion of the area planted to varieties released in the previous five years.The following hypothetical example illustrates the method . Assume that a target is set to grow only varieties released in the previous seven years (n := 7) (two years for seed multiplication and five years for varietal longevity). Then the indices of varietal newness (N,) calculated from Table 2.3 are as follows: Weighted average age of varieties-This index consists of the average age, A\" of varieties grown by farmers, measured in years from varietal release and weighted by the proportion of area sown to each variety. Again, using the data from Table 2 This index is easy to construct and does not require a \"target\" replacement period, n, to be pre-selected. It will be the main index used here.It is important to note that this is an aggregate measure. Though it is related to the optimal replacement period for an individual farmer (see above), it is not the same. In particular, aggregate weighted average age is affected by the amount of time from varietal release until a substantial amount of seed first reaches farmers, and by the fact that the actual year when farmers change varieties may differ from farmer to farmer.It is possible to construct crude indices of varietal replacement that do not consider the genetic makeup of disease resistance in released varieties. The simplest measure is the proportion of area devoted to the most popular variety. Targets may be set to keep this proportion in any given area to, say, 33% or less (Duvick 1984). As more is known about the specific genes conferring rust resistance, this index can be considerably refined by grouping varieties that carry the same gene sets for resistance against known rust races to make the calculations (Priestley and Bayles 1980).Varietal Replacement and Diversification in the Punjab, 1965-86 and1978-86 Data for analyzing varietal diversification in the Punjab were provided by the Crop Reporting Service (CRS), Lahore. Since the 1978 rust epidemic, the CRS has recorded the area planted to specific varieties in randomly selected farmers' fields in the Punjab. These data are not without limitations; in particular, the CRS does not allow for the fact that, on average, 12-15% offarmers cannot reliably identify which wheat variety they grow (Chapter 3). A tendency to rely on physical identification has probably led to an overestimation of some varieties, especially Yecora, a sister line of Pari, from which it is almost physically indistinguishable. Nonetheless, data at the provincial level reasonably reflect general trends in varietal use. At the zonal level, estimated area in each variety is also fairly consistent with estimates from independent surveys conducted by wheat breeders and economists from 1985 to 1988 (Chapter 3).Rate of varietal release--Upon its release in 1965, Mexipak became the first commercially successful semidwarf wheat in Pakistan. Around 1970 the rate of varietal release increased substantially with the rapid development of other semidwarf materials. Two decades later, some 27 new varieties, all but one of them semidwarf, had been approved for cultivation in the Punjab (Tables 2.4 and 2.5). Nonetheless, the rate of release in Pakistan is low relative to other countries. In the Punjab and for Pakistan as a whole, 0.29 varieties have been released per year per million hectares of wheat cultivated. This figure can be compared to an average of 0.72 varieties/yr/million ha for 15 developing countries and 0.45 varieties/yr/million ha for 7 developed countries (Table 2.6). The lower rate of varietal release in the Punjab partly reflects its relative agroclimatic uniformity and large wheat area.In addition to a relatively slow rate of varietal release, the rate of acceptance of varieties in the Punjab may be a problem. Of 20 varieties released from 1965 to 1981, six can be considered failures as they were never planted to more than 1% of the area, and only nine were adopted on 5% or more of the area (Table 2.7). The latter figure is consistent with adoption in other countries, where only about half of the varieties released are expected to become commercial successes. Nonetheless, the number and quality of varieties released in the Punjab would probably have been sufficient to allow reasonable varietal diversification over space and time, if each variety had been rapidly adopted by farmers on roughly equivalent areas. Note: Some varieties are recommended for both normal and late planting or for both irrigated and rainfed wheat. The area under Punjab-8l has probably peaked because of that variety's stripe rust susceptibility and tendency to shatter at harvest, and it is estimated that the area under Pak-8l will peak at over 50% in 1991. Adoption ofPak-8l is growing quite rapidly in some areas (e.g., the rice-wheat area of northeastern Punjab) and more slowly in others .Three other varieties have been and continue to be important, covering 10% or more of the area, but usually for specific situations. Blue Silver, also known as Sonalika, is grown widely and recommended especially for late planting. Lyallpur-73 is prominent in the rainfed areas. The area planted to older, taller, and desi (local) varieties has continuously declined and their cultivation is now largely confined to the driest rainfed areas.Two measures of varietal replacement (the percentage area sown to new varieties released in the past five years, N and the average age ofvarieties, A,) were \" calculated for 1978-86 using the indices of varietal replacement described earlier. When varietal replacement is calculated using the conventional definition of new varieties (those released in the previous five years: n = 5), the area planted to new varieties has averaged only 11%. Even if the definition is relaxed to include varieties released in the past seven years (n = 7), the area sown to new varieties is relatively small.The average age of varieties was calculated as about 10 years for all varieties and about nine for semidwarfs only (Figure 2.5). The average age of all varieties has not changed even though newer semidwarfs have replaced some of the old tall varieties. Over 95% of the irrigated area is now sown to semidwarfs and the average age of semidwarf varieties has actually tended to increase over time (Figure 2.5). This trend is disturbing because disease pressure is greatest in irrigated areas.These statistics on varietal replacement in the Punjab compare unfavorably with data from similar wheat growing areas. For example, in the Indian Punjab, the percentage of area sown to varieties released in the previous five years averages 30% compared to 11% in the Punjab of Pakistan. Correspondingly the average age of new varieties in the Indian Punjab (6.5 years) is less than three-quarters of the average age of new varieties in the Punjab of Pakistan. In the smaller, more uniform wheat growing environment of northwestern Mexico, the rate of varietal replacement is much faster than in either India or Pakistan (Table 2.8). Exposure to risk of disease--The slow rate of varietal replacement has left much wheat area in the Punjab exposed to severe risk of a rust epidemic for most of the past decade. From 1977 to 1986 the area sown to varieties that are no longer approved because of disease susceptibility averaged 42%. This figure underestimates the risk of a rust epidemic, since several recommended varieties are also susceptible to the disease . It also does not include the related problem of growing approved varieties outside of their recommended zones. The Cereal Disease Research Institute (CDRI) inoculates plots in farmers' fields to measure the susceptibility of commercial varieties to leaf rust (PARC 1987). These data suggest that the percentage area planted to varieties rated at 50S or above (50% severity with a susceptible field response, based on the modified Cobb scale) averaged 59% between 1982 and 1986 (Table 2.9). Another measure of exposure to an epidemic is the average coefficient of infection (ACI) for leaf rust over the total provincial wheat area, based on varieties (weighted by area) sown in farmers' fields . In 1984/85, a relatively high value of 36 was registered for this indicator. 4Aside from the devastating losses that a rust epidemic could cause, actual losses to leaf rust are already substantial. Scientists estimated a 10% loss (equivalent to 400,000 t of wheat) in 1986/87 in fields planted to such susceptible varieties as WL 711, Blue Silver, and Yecora; this occurred mostly in the Punjab. Losses of such magnitude not only justify increased investment in wheat research but also in seed multiplication, seed promotion, and extension.Diversification in space--A simple measure of diversification over space is the percentage area sown to one variety at a given time. This measure can be calculated at various levels of aggregation-the farm level, district or divisional level, or 4 For information on how ACI is calculated, see Stubbs et al. (1986).provincial level. At the provincial level, one variety usually tends to dominate half or more of the total wheat area. For example, Mexipak is estimated to have covered nearly 60% of the area in 1971 (Nagy 1984).The dependence on one variety is even more striking at the divisional level. Surveys in the rice-wheat zone showed that Yecora covered 60% of the area in 1984 (Byerlee et al. 1984). The CRS, Punjab, records an even higher percentage planted to Yecora in 1982 and 1983 in that zone. In individual villages there is also evidence that farmers concentrate on one variety (Heisey et al. 1987). At the farm level, where varietal diversification is a function of farm size, even large-scale farmers with more than 10 ha plant an average of 75% of their wheat land to one variety (Table 2.10).Yield Gains in the Punjab, 1965-86 Since varietal replacement appears to be slow in the Punjab, it is important to investigate one of the most critical factors in farmers' uptake of new varieties, gains in yield.Methods--A number of methods are available for measuring yield gains due to new varieties (for a review see Godden 1987). Ideally, recording yield gains due to breeding will require a varietal trial in which important varieties released over the period of interest are grown under practices of representative farmers (e.g., date of planting, fertilizer rate, etc.). In practice, such data are rarely available, and other less satisfactory approaches must be used.Two methods of analysis were employed to analyze information from varietal yield testing trials conducted over years, although only the second method, the vintage regression model, is reported here. Varieties included in these trials varied from year to year. In the first method an index is constructed by comparing the yield of each variety relative to the check variety (see Schmidt 1984 where Yi, is yield of variety i in year t (as above), D, are a set of dummy variables (0,1) for the experimental year t and D j are a set of(O,l) dummy variables for the \"vintage\" or period of release ofa variety. Godden and Brennan divided D into five-year periods. The GoddenlBrennan J formulation allows for nonlinear yield increases over time in newly released varieties. In our case we were only interested in the long term average rate of increase in yield gains, and the specification of the vintage function was simplified to the following two alternative forms:(2) t where 1n(Yit) is the natural log of Y i , and V i is the year in which variety i was released. The linear specification (equation 1) provides an estimate of the yield increase due to new varieties in absolute terms (i.e., c measures kg/ha/year yield gains) while the logarithmic specification gives the relative yield increase (i .e., c measures %/yr yield gains). Both specifications were tried, but because the logarithmic specification generally gave as good or better fit and since we were more interested in the relative yield gains, we report here only the logarithmic specification.Data sources--For this analysis, we employed two quite comprehensive data sets. The first is the results of the International Spring 'Wheat Yield Nursery (lSWYN) sent by CIMMYT to many countries for the past 22 years to measure yield performance and other varietal characteristics such as disease resistance over a wide range of environments. This nursery has been grown at Faisalabad since 1964/65 and data are published in the ISWYN reports for all years except 1976. Methods and practices used in the ISWYN have varied over the years, but the nursery trials have always used relatively high management levels on small plots, although no fungicide is applied. The date of planting varies from 10 to 24 November, generally considered the optimal planting period for this area. The variety Siete Cerros (or its sister lines Mexipak and Kalyonsona) was included as a check in all ISWYN trials . Over the years, all widely grown commercial varieties from Pakistan, both tall and semidwarf, have also been included in the ISWYN, either as advanced lines or as released varieties.The second data set consists of the results of a variety by date of planting trial conducted annually at the Khanewal Seed Farm since 1979/80. This replicated trial uses relatively large plot sizes and has included all major commercial varieties released since 1970. Sonalika is a common check variety over all years. Furthermore, each variety is grown at four dates of planting, typically ranging from 1 November to 31 December or early January. The performance of varieties over planting dates enables yield gains to be estimated under conditions more representative of farmers' conditions, since late planting has become increasingly more common in the Punjab as cropping intensity has increased. Nonetheless, the trials are planted with higher levels of inputs, especially fertilizer, than farmers use, so yields are considerably above farmers' levels.Results---Results of some of the vintage regression models are reported in Tables 2.11 and 2.12. The F -ratio for the group of dummy variables for year of experiment is generally highly significant and the coefficient for V, the year of varietal release, is also significant and positive in most cases.Estimates of the rate of yield gain due to new varieties are summarized in Tables 2.13 and 2.14 for various subsets of years, varieties, and dates of planting. The ISWYN data allow the estimation of yield gains to include the effect of the release of the first semidwarfvarieties in the 1960s. However, it is also interesting to know the yield gains achieved in successive generations of semidwarf varieties. The results of c The number given is the F -ratio to enter the set of dummy variables for year.both the vintage model and the yield relative to the check (Siete Cerros) indicate that yield gains for all varieties, including the change to semidwarf from tall varieties, has been nearly 2% per year, but for the semidwarfs alone, the yield gains have averaged about 1% per year.The ISWYN data set includes several varieties, especially Siete Cerros, which have become susceptible to rust over time. Hence, the estimated yield increase to new varieties includes both the effect of increasing yield potential of new varieties as well as the decline in yield of some older varieties caused by a breakdown in rust resistance. In fact the yield of Mexipak does show fairly high variability compared to other varieties, probably because of rust attack. An attempt was made to account for this effect by removing the years 1973, 1976, and 1978, when rust was severe and Mexipak (Siete Cerros) was given a leaf rust rating of 60S or higher. 5 The estimated rate of yield increase for \"non-rust\" years falls from 1.25% to 1.0% using the vintage model, suggesting an average rate of decay of 0.25% per year caused by a deterioration in rust resistance. This estimate is only a rough guide and is probably an underestimate since natural rust infestations in small yield plots, surrounded by resistant varieties, might be expected to be lower than in large fields of the same variety.The Khanewal Seed Farm data include 284 observations of variety by planting date by year. Only popular commercial varieties were included in the experiment but they can be divided into varieties for normal planting, varieties for late planting, and varieties for rainfed areas. Table 2.14 summarizes estimated yield gajns for various groups of varieties and dates of planting. In the irrigated Punjab most wheat is planted between 15 November and 15 December, so the best estimate of yield gains under farmers' conditions is the average of D2 and D3 or the average of D2, D3, and D4 (D2 =20 November, D3 = 10 December, D4 =end of December or early January).To account for these effects, date of planting was also included as an independent variable in the vintage equation. b 1973, 1976, 1978. *** Significant at 1%; **significant at 5%. The estimates for normal season varieties again suggest yield gains from 0.75-1.25% per year. However, for early maturing varieties for late planting and varieties for rainfed areas, there is no evidence of any yield gains. The evaluation of rainfed varieties should be conducted in rainfed conditions so the latter result is not surprising. For late planting, significant yield gains have been made for \"normal\" season varieties. These gains largely reflect the relatively good performance of Pak-81 and WL-711 under late planting (Byerlee, Akhter, and Hobbs 1987). The overall yield gains estimated relative to the check, Sonalika, also give a similar estimate of 0.88% per year.In synthesis, the results of the analysis of two comprehensive data sets by two methods give quite comparable results of yield gains to new varieties of about 1% per year or a little less since semidwarfs were first released, and nearly 2% per year if the introduction of semidwarfs is also included. These figures are quite comparable to estimates for Mexico by Evans (1981) and Waddington et al.(1986) and for the UK and Australia by Godden and Brennan (1987 ).There remains the question of whether these results can be applied to yield gains in farmers' fields under farmers' management. For some varieties, especially Pak-81, farmer surveys and on-farm experiments show that yield gains under farmers ' conditions are comparable (Byerlee et al. 1986), and we are willing to extrapolate these results to the farm level. However, to allow for the effect of a breakdown in rust resistance, a conservative overall estimate of yield gains of 0.75% per year due to new varieties may be more appropriate.This estimate of yield gains can be fed into the model of varietal replacement at the farmer level described above and by Heisey and Brennan (1989). Given the present seed-to-grain price ratio of about 1.5, and assuming yield gains of 0.75% per year and annual deterioration in the performance of varieties of 0.25%, farmers would be willing to change varieties every four years. If annual yield gains from breeding were 1 % and annual deterioration were 0.5%, individual varietal replacement time would be three years. These desired replacement times, coupled with an aggregate mean age of varieties of about nine years, imply that seed of new varieties reaches farmers an average of about seven years after release. Even if the price of seed were raised to a 2:1 ratio with grain, under the other assumptions specified above, the desired replacement times would be eight and five years. To maintain an aggregate mean age of nine years would require that seed reach farmers in four-and-a-half to six years. Aggregate mean age of varieties would be reduced if the increase in seed price stimulated seed production and sales .-_ : 1______ -Conclusions Several measures of varietal diversity applied to wheat in the Punjab indicate that varietal replacement has been slow and that exposure to disease risk has been high. Because of the large area sown to susceptible varieties, losses to rust have been considerable. However, whelj.t breeding has continued to provide potential benefits by increasing yield potential and changing the sources of disease resistance in available varieties. Although the rate of varietal release per million hectares of wheat has been somewhat low, the number and quality of the varieties released in the Punjab have been great enough to allow acceptable varietal diversification over space and time, had they been more rapidly adopted by farmers. Reasons for the slow rate of adoption will be among the major topics of following chapters.Paul W. Heisey, M. Ramzan Akhter, Khaleel A. Tetlay The most thorough varietal monitoring is presently conducted for the Punjab by the Crop Reporting Service (CRS) in Lahore, who collect information on wheat varieties as part of their annual estimation of area and yield. Their estimates of varietal coverage are not published, however, and wheat scientists are either unaware of their existence or uncertain of the methodology used to produce them. Although the CRS hesitates to claim accuracy for its estimates below the provincial level (reasons for this will become apparent later), their data remain the single most useful source for any analysis of varietal change in Pakistan, especially since equivalent data for other provinces are not available.Wheat varieties grown by farmers are also monitored occasionally by specialized institutions, such as agricultural extension or the Federal Seed Certification Department (FSCD). In addition to being occasional, these surveys tend to overrepresent large-scale farmers and thus to overestimate the area planted to new varieties.In 1985/86 social scientists from the Pakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC) conducted a major study of the constraints to rapid diffusion of new, disease resistant wheats in three major cropping systems. 2 Ferozewala, Gujranwala, and 1 More detailed information on the research reported in this chapter can be found in Akhter et al. (1986b); Akhter et al. (1987);Sharifet al. (1988); Khushk et al. (1987); Heisey et al. (1986 and1987); and Ahmad et al. (1988). Heisey et al. (1986 and1987) also describe the methodology used in estimating the relative areas covered by different wheat varieties.2 Much of the analysis in Chapters 5 and 6 is based on this study.--Daska tehsils (subdi'stricts) were selected to represent the rice-wheat system of the northeastern Punjab; Lodhran, Mailsi, and Bahawalpur tehsils to represent the cotton-wheat system of the southern Punjab; and the irrigated part of Mardan District to represent the irrigated Peshawar plain, North West Frontier Province (NWFP).3 (Survey areas are shown in Figure 1.1, page 2.) Thirty villages were randomly selected in each of the rice-wheat and cotton-wheat survey areas, and 20 villages were randomly chosen in irrigated Mardan. Over 1,200 farmers in the 80 villages were interviewed about the wheat varieties they were growing. Social scientists returned to the same villages later with wheat breeders from provincial wheat research institutes to identify the varieties grown in over 3,000 village wheat fields. In subsequent years, the social scientists have returned to the same villages to conduct similar surveys of farmers, though there have been no more breeders' surveys. In addition, farmer and breeders' surveys were conducted in two cotton wheat talukas (subdistricts) and two sugarcane-wheat talukas in Sind in 1986/87. These surveys provide the basis of some of the estimates reported below.The first problem in monitoring varieties is to identify them correctly. Identification can be done through physical identification or farmer interviews. Large surveys relying on physical identification are too costly for widespread use because only a few individuals have the specialized skills to identify with accuracy all varieties grown by farmers, even when the crop has reached maturity.4 On the other hand, relying on farmer interviews can also be problematic. Interviews with farmers in the Punjab and Sind revealed that 5-20% of the surveyed area was planted to wheat varieties that farmers could not name. In Mardan, the proportion was much higher: in three years of surveys, one-third to one-half of the wheat area was planted to varieties that farmers either could not name or referred to as \"Mexipak,\" which in addition to being a true varietal name is also the local name for any semidwarf wheat. Another complicating factor is that farmers identify their wheat varieties by the name given by the person who initially supplied the seed or on the basis of their own knowledge of a variety's characteristics. The present system of assigning varieties similar names makes it easy to confuse varieties (Punjab-81 and Punjab-85, for example, or Pak-81 and Punjab-8D.Despite some drawbacks, farmer interviews are likely to remain the major instrument in varietal monitoring. Even at present, interviews produce useful information; judicious questioning about the length of time a variety has. been planted can lead to a decision about whether or not it is a recent release, even though the specific name of the variety is not obtained.In the surveys reported here, \"don't know\" responses were divided into \"new, don't know\" and \"old, don't know\" categories. Varieties were labeled \"new, don't know\" if the farmer did not know the variety's name but said it was new. Supplementary questioning about the length of time the farmer had been growing the variety and the length of time other farmers in the same village had been growing it were used to confirm the farmer's opinion. This process required a certain amount of subjective judgment on the part of the enumerator and probably resulted in slight overestimation of the \"new, don't know\" category at the expense of the \"old, don't know\" category.The other major constraint to estimating varietal coverage accurately is sampling. Most large-scale varietal surveys, such as that of the CRS in the Punj ab, are byproducts of other research efforts and not designed primarily to record varietal information. Thus, sampling design is unlikely to maximize the efficiency of estimates of area planted to given varieties. This problem is complicated by the fact that, to the authors' knowledge, all the surveys described earlier used a cluster sampling design. Cluster sampling reduces survey costs through the selection of first-stage sampling units defined by location (\"clusters\"); second-stage sampling units are chosen from within the cluster. In the special studies in the rice-wheat, cotton-wheat, and Mardan areas, the first-stage unit was the village.Cluster sampling can produce efficient estimators if individual clusters are relatively heterogeneous with respect to the parameters in question and if there is relatively high homogeneity between clusters. Unfortunately this is not likely to be the case with respect to wheat variety. Researchers' experience in conducting specialized varietal identification studies has shown that varieties tend to be concentrated in particular villages. A farmer is more likely to grow the same variety grown by another randomly selected farmer in the same village than a variety grown by a randomly selected farmer in a•different village. Similarly, two wheat fields inspected by a breeder in the same village are more likely to be planted to the same variety than a random pair of wheat fields from two different villages. Estimates of varietal coverage from cluster sampling designs are therefore likely to have relatively high sampling error. In the short run, this method can be improved by choosing a relatively high number of clusters (villages) and a relatively low number of farmers (or fields) within each village. 5 5 In the long run, as the CRS moves towards area frame sampling designs, better estimates of varietal coverage are likely to result as a by-product.-Finally, if a survey is to provide estimates of varieties that cover relatively little area, it is in effect sampling from a rare population. Unless a relatively expensive survey is designed, it is unlikely that the estimates will be very accurate.Survey of Farmers and Breeders' Survey, 1985/86The special surveys conducted in 1985/86 exemplify some of the difficulties in accurately estimating varietal coverage. Varieties were identified by farmers and by wheat breeders in the same villages. Because of the sampling problem and the identification problem discussed earlier, there were large discrepancies The discrepancies for Yecora and Sandal in the rice-wheat zone might be related to the fact that they are sister lines. Yecora was introduced in 1974 and large amounts of seed were imported; in 1981 it was banned. Yecora's sister lines Pari-73 and Sandal were released in Pakistan in 1973 and are still approved but recommended for replacement. Although it is clear that Yecora was the dominant variety in the 6 For example, in the next two years (1986/87 and 1987/88), area under \"new, don't know\" varieties, as well as Pak-81, increased substantially in Mardan. Most of this \"new, don't know\" area can be presumed to be under Pak-81.Punjab in the late 1970s and early 1980s, there has probably been some tendency for farmers and the eRS to overestimate Yecora and underestimate Pari-73 and Sandal.In all three areas, estimates for WL-711 were higher in the breeders' survey and lower in the survey of farmers. For Blue Silver the situation was exactly the reverse.In the 1985/86 surveys, the discrepancy for Blue Silver was particularly apparent in the cotton-wheat zone. WL-711 is a variety of intermediate maturity and Blue Silver is early maturing. Though their physical characteristics are somewhat similar, they can be distinguished near maturity with only moderate difficulty.The discrepancy between farmers' and breeders' identification ofWL-711 in Mardan is partially accounted for by farmers' tendency to be unaware of varietal names. 7 The discrepancy for the cotton zone is more problematic. Subsequent surveys of farmers in the same area of the cotton zone, confirmed by unpublished eRS estimates, show a large, even increasing, proportion of wheat area under Blue Silver. Perhaps the cluster sampling problem is even more severe for the breeders' survey than the survey of farmers; and, as in Mardan, both WL-711 and Blue Silver may be referred to as \"India\" by farmers, although the name more commonly applies to WL-711.Estimates from the Crop Reporting Services and special studie~Though some wheat varieties are more widely adapted than others, different varieties are often more popular within different cropping systems. An obvious example is the use of certain varieties in irrigated agriculture and others in rainfed agriculture. Different requirements for maturity and disease resistance also account for varietal diversity over widely dispersed areas. For those reasons, and also because of differences in recording methodology, the Punjab-wide varietal estimates from the eRS cannot be compared directly with those from the special studies, which covered a much smaller area. Nonetheless, examining the different estimates for some of the major varieties together helps identify regional differences in varietal use (Tables 3.2 to 3.4).The estimates from the special studies for 1985/86 and 1986/87 are broadly consistent with the eRS estimates for the same years. In particular, both indicate that Pak-81 is undergoing rapid adoption and Yecora is nearly phased out. Two other results from the special studies might be predictors of province-wide trends: namely, that WL-711 and Punjab-81 probably reached their peak coverage in the years of the studies and are likely to have entered the disadoption phase.7 In fact, in Mardan \"India\" might refer to either WL-711 or Blue Silver, as both WL-711 and Blue Silver's sister line, Sonalika, were imported from India. Here, \"India\" has been recorded under WL-711; otherwise the discrepancy for WL-711 in Mardan would be even greater.Besides indicating general trends in varietal use and disuse, the special studies provide specific evidence of preference for particular varieties in the three crop production zones. Pak-81 , Punjab-81, and Yecora are clearly important in the rice wheat area, whereas WL-711 and Bahawalpur-79 are much more significant in the cotton-wheat area. Blue Silver is important in both zones, but particularly in the cotton-wheat area. WL-711 performs well when planted late, and Blue Silver has traditionally been recommended for rate planting. Although WL-711 has been recommended that Blue Silver be phased out, the actual choice of varieties in the cotton zone has been determined by the constraints of the cropping system rather than by recommendations based largely on disease resistance.Recent trends in varietal use in the special study areas--Data from three years of farmer surveys in the rice-wheat zone, cotton-wheat zone, and Mardan illustrate patterns in varietal use and identify trends among varieties in each zone. Some distinctions will be made in those data. First, \"new varieties\" in any year are defined as those released no more than five years ago. Second, in any year, varieties are classified as \"recommended\" or \"banned\" according to the list issued after the annual meeting of the wheat Varietal Evaluation Committee. B On the basis of those two definitions, varieties are classified as \"new recommended,\" \"old recommended,\" or \"banned.\" A third category, \"all varieties released in 1979 or more recently,\" is the basis of the study of the diffusion of new wheat seed and new wheat varieties, presented in Chapters 5 and 6.In the rice zone the wide diffusion of post-1978 releases (Table 3.5) is the result of fanners' adoption ofPak-81. The \"new, don't know\" category has also increased in area, implying that one or more recent releases are being adopted fairly rapidly. The area under Punjab-81 appears to be declining and Yecora can be considered nearly phased out. Although the large variability in the estimates makes it difficult to speculate about varieties that cover smaller proportions of the area, figures for 1987/88 suggest that the area planted to Blue Silver may also be declining. -In the cotton zone, the adoption ofpost-1978 releases has been much slower. Pak-81, Punjab-81, and Bahawalpur-79 appear to make up nearly equal proportions of that category. On the other hand, there has been a significant shift out of banned varieties into recommended varieties in the most recent year (Table 3.6).In Mardan, the relative area planted to old varieties is particularly high compared to the other two study areas. Mardan has relatively little area planted to varieties released in the 1970s and still recommended (Table 3.7). The increase of recommended varieties in Mardan has been overwhelmingly the result of the diffusion of Pak-81. The area under \"new, don't know\" varieties has been particularly high in the last two years, implying that, although the estimated area under Pak-81 -----in Mardan is about 30%, the true proportion may be closer to 45%. The latter percentage would make the diffusion ofPak-81 in Mardan comparable to its spread in the rice-wheat area.Several measures could improve identification of varieties in farmer surveys in Pakistan and elsewhere. First, more distinctive varietal names could be chosen.Second, enumerators should be trained to record \"don't know\" responses and local names; farmers should not be prompted with the name of a variety that the enumerator knows. Sampling designs could also improve. If cluster sampling is used, more clusters with fewer farmers per cluster would improve sampling efficiency, as varietal use tends to be correlated over short distances. 9 However, large-scale varietal monitoring is likely to remain a byproduct of other surveys, notably those intended to estimate wheat production and yield. Agencies that monitor varieties, such as Pakistan's Crop Reporting Services, should be consulted to determine if their current sampling designs could, with minimal modifications, produce useful estimates for major cropping systems within large areas.Estimates of wheat varietal coverage should be circulated rapidly and widely to policy makers, wheat breeders, and pathologists. In Pakistan, disseminating these data in February or March would allow more in-depth assessment of the current crop and assist the Varietal Evaluation Committee and the Federal Committee on Agriculture to recommend varieties and set seed production targets. Furthermore, CRSs in provinces other than the Punjab should be encouraged to collect and report varietal data; varieties should be identified following guidelines suggested above.Finally, special studies may occasionally need to be done in areas of interest to pathologists or epidemiologists. The special studies reported here, if they are continued, will allow longitudinal analysis of varietal change within particular cropping systems. They will prove particularly useful if they are integrated with analyses of other changes, both in wheat technology and within the cropping system . 109 For example, data from the studies reported in this chapter show that planting of new varieties tended to be concentrated in some villages rather than to be spread evenly over most of the villages.10 For example, studies conducted by the Agricultural Economics Research Unit, Faisalabad, and the PARC/CIMMYT collaborative program, have looked at the rapid spread of an earlier maturing basmati rice variety, and the use of combine harvesters by larger farmers, in the rice-wheat zone (Sharif et al. 1989;and Smale 1987, respectively). These changes may affect the choice of wheat varieties as they imply somewhat earlier planting dates for wheat. 4.1. On average, that seed was enough to cover 2-4% of the total wheat area in Punjab Province, although substantial amounts of seed were sold in the late 1960s when seed of high-yielding varieties was first imported from Mexico.Under the ADC, pre-basic seed produced at government research institutes was multiplied into basic seed at ADC farms. Basic seed was multiplied into certified seed at registered growers' farms and then offered for sale to 17.0 3.9 its own network of 47 bulk centers and 212 retail points throughout 1 A fuller treatment of this subject can be found in Chaudhry and Heisey (1987). The cooperation of Chemonics International Consulting Division in supporting this research is gratefully acknowledged.-----the country. Staffing problems led the ADC to recruit employees from the military, but they lacked agricultural experience. Seed targets were established arbitrarily with little reference to market demand.These inadequacies combined to make the quantity and quality of seed offered for sale to farmers unacceptable. The ADC was dissolved in 1972 and its functions relating to seed production and marketing were assumed by the provincial governments. In Punjab Province, Punjab Agricultural Development and Supplies Corporation (PAD&SC) took over most of ADC's assets and staff and continued operations.Unfortunately the new organizational structure did not rectify the problems that brought about ADC's failure. To replace the seed production system with a modern seed industry that would release new varieties and multiply, process, certify, store, and market seed, the government initiated a Seed Industry Project in 1976 with the financial and technical assistance of the World Bank. The main benefit anticipated from the project was the higher crop yields to be obtained by users of improved quality seed. To implement the project, provincial seed corporations were established in the Punjab and Sind. One of them, the Punjab Seed Corporation (PSC), now markets seed for 12 crops, although cotton and wheat seed are by far its dominant products.The PSC produces pre-basic wheat seed at the research institutes or at the Foundation Seed Cell, Khanewal. Pre-basic seed is multiplied into basic seed at the PSC farms and supplied to registered growers contracted by the PSC to produce certified seed. At all stages of seed multiplication, standing crops are inspected by an independent agency, the Federal Seed Certification Department (FSCD). Seed is procured only from fields approved by the FSCD. That agency also tests the purity and quality of seed during processing and distribution . In addition to the routine seed certification tests of the FSCD, the PSC has established its own Internal Quality Control Cell at each plant site. This system also tests seed at the fields of registered growers, in their stores, and at PSC plant sites or stores.Pre-basic seed production-Pre-basic seed of impeccable quality is essential to a successful seed program. In Pakistan, pre-basic seed is produced at the research institutes two years ahead of the certified seed crop, under the direct supervision of plant breeders. To handle pre-basic seed production adequately, the research institutes have been provided with sophisticated laboratory equipment under the Seed Industry Project.Because pre-basic seed is produced two years before the certified seed crop, production in year t depends upon certified seed requirements in year t+3 . Certified seed requirements depend upon anticipated seed demand and rate of seed replacement. 2 In the early years of the Seed Industry Project, breeders lacked resources to produce the quantities of pre-basic seed that were required. To meet the anticipated demand for certified seed, it was decided to produce two generations of basic seed at the PSC farms (2,370 ha in three farms at Khanewal and 70 ha at Sahiwal). This increased the certified seed production cycle from three years to four.To shorten the cycle, a \"Foundation Seed Cell\" was established in 1980/81 at the PSC seed farm in Khanewal to produce pre-basic seed under breeders' supervision. In the first three years of the Foundation Seed Cell program, the PSC share in pre-basic seed production increased from 20-40% to over 90% from 1983/84 onward.Basic seed production-Basic seed is the progeny of pre-basic seed. To ensure the closest possible control over production and handling, basic seed is produced on PSC farms. The PSC, after taking over the farms, levelled the fields and provided such resources as tubewell irrigation, tractors, agricultural machinery, and management and technical guidance for the tenants.Area sown to pre-basic seed and total basic seed production are shown in Table 4.2. Each variety's share in the total basic seed production plan has changed over the years as new varieties have been introduced. 3 Sandal, Lyallpur-73, LU-26, and Pari- 1977) for assumptions used in planning the Seed Industry Project. They imply, very roughly, a certified seed requirement of 70,000 tlyr for the Punjab. Using fairly conservative assumptions about seed multiplication ratios, this implies production of 25-40 t of pre-basic seed each year. 3 Details of pre-basic and basic seed production for each year by variety can be found in Chaudhry and Heisey (1987).-----73 dominated the PSC seed multiplication program during its early years when total output was lower than at present. More recently, Pak-81, Punjab-81, and Blue Silver have been the leading varieties featured in the seed production plan.Certified seed production-To improve reliability of seed supplies and minimize managerial problems, farmers selected by the PSC to produce certified seed must meet certain standards. The criteria for selection are:• The grower should be cooperative, reliable, financially sound, and prepared to adopt recommended farm development and crop production practices;• The farm unit of the grower/family should be at least 40 ha and preferably directly cultivated; and• Farms should be near the seed processing plants. (Progressive growers with large mechanized farms located farther from processing plants are chosen occasionally.)There are currently 572 PSC-registered growers, 310 in category \"A\" and 262 in category \"B.\" The PSC enters into contracts with category \"B\" growers only if the total production target is beyond the capacity of its category \"A\" growers. During recent years, certified wheat seed was produced on an average of 19,000 ha of category \"A\" farmers' land and 13,000 ha belonging to category \"B\" farmers .The quantities of wheat seed procured from registered growers are shown in Table 4.3, along with annual targets fixed by the government and targets planned in the original PC-I (Seed Industry Project) scheme. Production of certified seed for four individual varieties widely grown by farmers is also shown. 4 The total amount of wheat seed procured by the PSC rose from 4,000 t in 1979/80 to 43,000 tin 1986/87. Most of this increase in certified seed procurement occurred in the PSC's first five years; it has levelled off since 1983/84. The total amount of \"improved wheat seed\" reported as distributed in the Punjab doubled from 1979/80 to 1986/97, from 22,000 t to the current figure (Government of Pakistan 1983). It appears that in the early years of PSC operation PAD&SC was distributing seed that was not produced by the PSC.sThe PSC fell short of procurement targets every year except for 1979/80 and 1982/83, when it sold all the seed it procured. In 1979/80 the procurement target was very low compared to following years. It was PSC's first year in the market and marketing 4 Further details of certified seed production by variety can be found in Chaudhry and Heisey (1987).5 It is unlikely that much of the non-PSC seed distributed was certified by the FSCD, as this agency was established by the Seed Act of 1976 and was probably not fully operational until the 1980s.efforts were substantial in relation to the amount of seed procured. The year 1982/83 was good because seed ofWL-711 and Punjab-81 was in great demand, and PSC stocks consisted mainly of those varieties.The procurement targets from 1979/80 to 1981182 were very much in line with those planned in the Seed Industry Project appraisal report (PC-I). But in 1983/84 and thereafter, targets fixed by the government and quantities actually procured were significantly below the targets planned in the PC-I scheme.The relationship between amounts of certified seed procured for the four varieties listed in Table 4.3 and the area covered by those varieties is shown in Figure 4.1.The same scales are used in each part of the figure. The figure indicates that seed of those four varieties continues to spread although certified seed production has diminished or stopped. For the older varieties Blue Silver and WL-711, it is difficult to establish the amount of time between seed production and significant area coverage, especially since some seed of those varieties was probably first distributed outside of the PSC network. For the more recent releases Pak-81 and Punjab-81, area seems to have increased rapidly about two years after the first large increases in seed production.In many seed multiplication schemes, particularly in the earlier stages of production of basic and pre-basic seed, seed rates are lower than those usually chosen by farmers (Hanson et al. 1982). The aim is not to maximize biological yield (or economic profit) but rather the ratio of seed output to seed input. Though greater than-normal quantities of other inputs may maintain yields (Brennan and Appleyard 1982), some yield reduction is also a possibility. The data in Tables 4.2 and 4.3, as well as data for individual varieties, indicate that implied multiplication ratios from pre-basic to basic seed and from basic to certified seed vary greatly from year to year. Furthermore, multiplication ratios from pre basic to basic seed are often rather low . The fairly good yields in Table 4 .2 indicate that some aspects of production were carefully managed on the PSC seed farms. On the other hand, seed rates implied by the second and third columns of the table are often high, even higher than \"normal\" seed rates for irrigated wheat in Pakistan. One explanation is that some of the pre-basic seed does not meet standards for basic seed production. Another possibility is that some pre-basic seed is diverted from basic seed production, either because production plans for varietal mix change or for other reasons . Data for some popular varieties, notably Pak-81 and Punjab-81, also show rather low multiplication ratios, implying that diversions are not the result of changes in production plans.It seems that the main cause of fluctuating multiplication ratios from basic to certified seed is that the amount of certified seed procured is mainly determined by the government's procurement target and PSC's perception of how much seed it can sell, rather than by the amount of basic seed available from the previous production cycle. In years when the ratio of certified to basic seed is low, either some basic seed does not go into certified seed production, some seed produced by registered growers does not meet certification standards, or seed produced by registered growers is simply not procured by the PSC. On the other hand, in years when the apparent ratio of certified to basic seed is high, the PSC may have procured certified seed indirectly from farmers who were not issued basic seed for multiplication under contract, if the seed they produced met certification standards.Given the area PSC now has available for basic seed production and the number of its contract growers, the corporation clearly has the capacity to meet total wheat seed production targets. But the PSC generally follows a conservative approach and procures only as much seed as its managers feel can be sold, with some reference to the annual seed production targets fixed by the Federal Committee on Agriculture. The targets are generally based on the amount of seed sold and on targets assigned in the previous year. The PSC is not a member of the Federal Committee on Agriculture, and constraints faced by the PSC in procuring and selling seed are not taken into account when targets are set. Too high a procurement target can lead to procurement of seed that does not meet seed certification standards or is of unapproved varieties.The PSC can now make 8,000-9,000 t of seed of individual varieties available to farmers three years after release (as it did with Pak-81) or even two years after release when release seems to have been anticipated (Punjab-81). There may be several ways to increase seed production capacity, but doing so requires early decisions about which varieties to multiply. Past coordination of varietal choice between the government and the PSC has not been encouraging; procedures for selecting, retaining, and withdrawing varieties for seed multiplication and distribution have not been understood clearly by all parties. Although the seed production cycle takes three to four years, decisions to retain or reject a variety are made yearly.For example, in 1981/82 the Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MINFA)•and PARC recommended that Blue Silver, Bahawalpur-79, Sandal, Pari-73, and Indus-79 be grown for only one year, and only in specified limited zones. s But the next year PSC was asked to multiply those varieties again, because replacements for them were not forthcoming. In another instance, during 1981/82 the variety WL-711 was not allowed to be distributed because it had been banned, but PSC had to procure it because it was already planted with contract growers.One reason for the PSC's conservatism in multiplying recently released varieties is that breeders and the seed corporation have limited knowledge of a variety's acceptability to farmers. Breeders attempt to evaluate promising materials by planting them in microplots in farmers' fields. Mter that, lines proposed for release are tested for two years in the National Uniform Wheat Yield Trials (NUWYTs). Plot sizes in the microplot trials and the NUWYTs are too small for farmer evaluation. Also, for breeders to evaluate the materials properly, the level of management must be somewhat more intensive than the management farmers usually provide. Since farmers' reactions are not recorded, breeders and the PSC have little information about a variety's commercial possibilities over a wide area .Seed processing includes drying, cleaning, grading, and packing. Under the Seed Industry Project, three seed processing plants are to be installed, one each at Khanewal, Sahiwal, and RY. Khan. Each plant will have the capacity to process about 27,600 t of wheat seed. The plant at Khanewal has been in operation since 1985, but the other two are not yet functional. In the meantime, the PSC uses other processing methods, such as cleaning wheat seed with locally made sieves.Total planned storage capacity in open storage and silos will be about 43,000 t. Currently the PSC stores about 22,000 t of wheat seed annually in its own facilities and hires warehouses, some of which cannot be fumigated properly, for storing the remaining seed.The Industry Council for Development (ICD) report on Pakistan's seed industry (1987) notes that the assumption that a seed certification law addresses all consumer protection issues is not justified. The apparent lack of consumer protection laws at the retail level provides merchants with the opportunity to mix noncertified seed with high-quality certified seed. However, despite current problems with seed 6 Indus-79 never achieved commercial success.processing and quality control, two recent studies conducted by the Punjab Economic Research Institute (PERI) and the PSC (Sharif et al. 1986;PSC 1986) indicate that 80% or more of farmers sampled throughout the Punjab were satisfied with the quality of seed supplied by the PSC. The PERI study referred specifically to wheat seed. The PSC results might be biased positively both because the quality of cotton seed produced by the PSC is exceptionally good and because the survey was done by PSC field staff, who were also responsible for procuring and distributing seed. Even though few consumers appear to complain about the quality of PSC wheat seed, consumer protection measures should be strengthened.The distribution network-The PSC sells its seed through public and private organizations. At first the PSC used the retail outlets ofPAD&SC, but as it expanded it began selling seed through private dealers, its own outlets, and branches of the Provincial Cooperative Bank. The PAD&SC also markets seed through private dealers who are primarily agents for PAD&SC fertilizers.Between 1981 and 1986 the number ofPSC outlets increased from under 400 to over 900. These may be viewed as potential outlets, as the amount of seed handled per outlet varies widely. The largest market share in 1985/86 was held by PAD&SC, which handled 59% of PSC wheat seed sold in the Punjab. These sales were made through 186 PAD&SC sale depots as well as some of the 581 private dealers carrying PSC seed. The rest of the private dealers, who receive seed directly from the PSC, accounted for 27% of the Punjab market. Most of the remaining seed, approximately 14%, was sold by 11 PSC sale depots located either at seed processing plant sites or divisional headquarters. Although 140 Cooperative Bank branches supposedly handle PSC seed, less than 1% of the seed sold was marketed through the bank.A geographic breakdown of sale points shows that private dealers and PSC depots are concentrated in the cotton zone, suggesting that PSC depots are more likely to be located in areas where a more profitable product, cotton seed, can be marketed. The concentration of PSC depots (6 out of 11) in the cotton zone is also influenced by the fact that PSC farms and seed processing plants are located there.The P AD&SC has had difficulty establishing itself as an effective institution for marketing agricultural inputs. Its market shares for its two major products, fertilizer and seed, have declined with time because of the private sector's increased involvement in marketing inputs. That trend has led the PAD&SC to reduce its sale points by about half in recent years and has diminished the PSC's enthusiasm for selling its seed through the PAD&SC network. But it is awkward for PSC to decline to use PAD&SC as its distributing agent: the two organizations share the same Chairman and Board of Directors and the PSC has not developed an alternative marketing arrangement although it has been in business for almost eight years. Some of these problems are reflected in the dealings of the two public sector organizations with the network of private dealers. A majority of the private dealers selling seed are PAD&SC agents. When they come to PAD&SC stores to get fertilizer, they are sometimes required to take seed as well. Private dealers who deal directly with the PSC received a commission of Rs 12 per 90-kg bag in 1985/86, but those selling seed for the PAD&SC received Rs 8 per 90-kg bag. The PAD&SC retains the balance of the PSC commission to support its own operations. Furthermore, these commissions, even after a 100% increase between 1985/86 and 1986/87, are still less than 5% of final product price. Commissions on fertilizer are nearly 20%. The PAD&SC dealers are particularly unhappy with the situation.Management of seed distribution-Before the selling season begins, the PSC asks its dealers, private and public, about their anticipated demand and later transports the seed to dealers' stores at its own expense in accordance with a mutually agreed upon supply schedule. As the season proceeds, supplies are adjusted depending on the market.Seed is supplied to public sector agencies and private dealers on a \"cash and carry\" basis as a matter of policy, but in practice the requirement is usually relaxed for public sector agencies. Some private dealers who have established their creditworthiness with the PSC also receive seed on credit against guarantees.The PSC pays the same rate of commission to all distributing agents with whom it deals directly. If some of the stocks supplied to distributors are not sold, PSC takes them back at its own expense and refunds the dealers. The PSC is considering ending this policy to avoid transportation costs, but such a change would discourage PSC agents from requesting more seed. Already some dealers state that the PSC is reluctant to take back unsold stocks.Most dealers handling PSC seed are dissatisfied with the corporation's seed distribution. Poor planning and coordination between the marketing staff and stores staff mean that seed supplies are often delayed, quantities dispatched sometimes exceed quantities requested, or seed is sent to a geographic zone for which it is inappropriate. The quality of packing material is reportedly very poor. All of these factors negatively affect the total sales volume at the retail level, compounding the problem of unsold stocks.All marketing activities of the PSC are supervised by the staff of the Marketing Division, where one assistant manager is presently responsible for monitoring seed sales in three districts. If sales are to be supervised effectively, the number of marketing field staff must be increased, as this area is too large for one person to cover.-Total sales--Presently, the PSC produces approximately 44,000 t of wheat seed-about 70% of the demand for certified seed planned in the original project and about 9% of the total annual provincial demand (Table 4.4).7.8Ten percent of annual demand might not be too different from wheat seed production in other parts of the world (J. Longmire, personal communication).In the early years of the PSC, almost all of the corporation's wheat seed was sold in the cotton-wheat zone, particularly in Multan Division. The proportion of seed sold in that zone has fallen steadily but, even in 1985/86, Multan and Bahawalpur Divisions, with 30% of the total Punjab wheat area, accounted for 43% ofPSC wheat seed sales. The concentration of both seed production and retail outlets in this area is certainly responsible for the zone's large share of sales.Even though it obtains quantities of seed smaller than the targets assigned by the government, the PSC in some years does not sell all the seed it procures and offers the remainder for sale as grain in the open market. The PSC has been unsuccessful in selling all its seed stocks for several reasons. First, procurement targets are set arbitrarily. Second, the seed marketing system is inefficient. Improved marketing requires greater coordination between units within the PSC and better planning of which varieties to produce and where to market them. Finally, neither the seed project planners nor PSC management have resolved the aims and principles of seed pricing in the marketing process. The implications of this last problem are discussed next. 7 Total sales figures include seed sold to other provinces and exported to other countries. However, the quantities sold to other provinces and countries have been small relative to total sales.8 A breakdown of sales by districts within the Punjab can be found in Chaudhry and Heisey (1987).-----Current pricing and subsidies-The PSC, like many other quasi-public organizations dealing in seed, tends to base pricing decisions on costs. Before the selling season, the PSC Marketing Division proposes the sale rate of seed, which is usually approved by the Board of Directors. The sale rate is fixed to recover the actual expenditure incurred in procuring, storing, and handling seed. To ensure the PSC's financial viability, a corporation margin is added to the end price of seed.Various cost items that enter into the calculation of the retail price of seed are shown in Table 4.5. Although the procurement price of wheat has increased by 60% since 1980/81 and the premium paid to contract growers has stayed constant during the last five years, it is difficult to interpret changes over time in other costs. The PSC distributes most of seed handling and other operating costs over wheat and cotton seed, so one reason for irregular changes in the cost structure may be the variation in total volume of wheat and cotton seed that is procured and sold.Nonetheless, it is hard to understand why the corporation margin is charged in one year and not in another; how it differs from corporation overheads; or how distribution costs can stay constant over time when total quantities handled, transportation costs, and wage rates are all increasing. Also, it is important to note that the commission paid to dealers was Rs 12 per 90-kg bag instead of Rs 8, the figure used in calculating the 1986/87 sale rate. This discrepancy may result from inconsistencies noted earlier in the actual commission that is paid to the final dealer.The price of wheat seed was subsidized for the first six years of the Seed Industry Project. The government subsidy was gradually reduced after 1983/84 and ended completely in 1986/87 . There may still be a small element of cross-subsidization within the PSC, which assigns a smaller share of corporation overheads to wheat seed than to cotton seed because farmers are relatively more willing to pay for cotton seed. Furthermore, the initial fixed costs of establishing seed farms and processing plants are not reflected in the price of seed.When farmers change wheat varieties, their willingness to pay for seed is fairly high. However, for a given variety, incremental benefits associated with the use of certified wheat seed may not always be enough to support a high seed-to-grain price ratio if a farmer has only been planting a variety for a few years or can purchase fairly good seed from a neighboring farmer. The PSC should recognize that, although it enjoys a monopoly in the certified wheat seed market, it cannot increase the price of wheat seed without adopting a more aggressive marketing strategy that emphasizes varietal replacement.The PSC does not have a marketing research unit and bases its seed production and distribution plans on historical trends. Furthermore, no regular information is collected about why one variety is preferred over another in a particular cropping n --------111------------------------------ 1980/81 and 1982/83; 10.5% in 1982183; and 14% from 1983-84 onwards. e About 3-5% of \"total procurement price.\".:--zone. 9 Sales promotion is weak. The PSC has been in the business for nine years, yet the brand name of its product has not been established. All of these factors suggest the need to establish a strong marketing research unit capable of regularly generating information and analyzing marketing problems. If such a unit is established, a reorganization of existing procurement and marketing field staff would be appropriate.The Agricultural Development Authority (ADA) of North West Frontier Province (NWFP), which is also responsible for the supply of other agricultural inputs in NWFP, organizes the production of certified wheat seed in the province. lo In theory, the system works as follows. Pre-basic seed is provided by wheat breeders from the research institutes, notably the Cereal Crops Research Institute (CCRI), Pirsabak. Basic seed is grown on government farms run by agricultural extension. Certified seed is produced by registered growers, who are private farmers. Both the Federal Seed Certification Department and representatives of the ADA inspect the seed at all stages of the process.If growers clean seed, they receive a higher price premium. Both the growers and the ADA primarily use hand sieves to clean seed. The ADA owns no storage facilities and hires privately owned storage. Seed is fumigated, and though there are some losses in storage, they have been minimal.The ADA maintains some 25 to 30 sale points throughout NWFP. The amount of wheat seed moving through these sale points varies widely. In recent years one-third to one-half of the total wheat seed distributed by the ADA has passed through the two distribution centers in Mardan District, the district covered in the surveys reported in Chapters 3, 5, and 6.The smooth flow of seed from pre-basic through certified production to the farmer is often interrupted. Though the ADA sometimes cannot market a substantial portion of the wheat seed it procures, in the recent past there has been a strong demand for seed from various development projects in the province. This demand has led to seed diversions before the certified stage, at times forcing the provincial research institutes into the role of seed supplier. II -Total wheat seed procured by the ADA between 1982 and 1986 has been about 3,000 to 4,000 t (Table 4.6). Varietal procurement has concentrated on Pak-81; Blue Silver and Lyallpur-73 are the other major varieties. Up until 1985/86, a substantial proportion of this seed was bought from the Punjab Seed Corporation (PAC), but in 1986/87 the ADA was successful in obtaining its entire requirement from registered growers in NWFP. The amount of seed procured has ranged between 4 and 5% of the total annual wheat seed requirement of the province, comparable to the situation in the Punjab in the late 1960s and early 1970s (Chapter 4).Wheat seed targets for NWFP and the problems of unsold seed-Many assumptions must be made in setting seed targets. Wheat seed is not replaced every year because farmers maintain their own seed; a desirable target for seed turnover might be every five years (Chapter 2). Farmers in rainfed areas are more likely to grow older tall varieties for which seed is not supplied by the formal seed system. Furthermore, the particular problems of marketing seed to small farmers make it difficult to maintain much effective demand from the very smallest farmers. In NWFP, a gTeater proportion of the wheat area is unirrigated than in any other province; furthermore, farm size is much smaller than in the Punjab. These factors suggest that a reasonable target for certified wheat seed procurement as a proportion of total seed use might be lower in NWFP than in the Punjab.There is no substitute for a thorough seed planning exercise. Nonetheless, applying the same assumptions used in the PSC planning document (see Chaudhry and Heisey, 1987)12 would imply an annual certified seed requirement for NWFP of 8,000 t. Reducing this amount by a further 25% to reflect the lower demand caused by very small farm size and remote farm locations in NWFP suggests a target of around 6,000 t per annum for wheat seed procurement by the ADA. -Seed production is, as noted, a somewhat greater constraint to the adequate supply of wheat seed in NWFP than in the Punjab. Yet in NWFP, as in the Punjab, the inability of the seed authority to market larger quantities of seed has also been a major constraint to greater seed production. In 1985/86 one-third of the wheat seed procured by the ADA remained unsold, leading to considerable concern among provincial authorities, as unsold stocks are put on the open grain market. The losses incurred are reflected in increases in the next year's seed price. In 1986/87, the gap between procurement and distribution narrowed again, largely because of substantial purchases by development projects. A single project alone took 30% of the total provincial procurement. The provincial government also reinstituted the practice of distributing some certified wheat seed through agricultural extension.Seed Pricing in NWFP-Seed pricing is determined by adding storage and distribution costs to the wheat grain price and the premium paid to the registered 4.5). This in effect must mean some hidden subsidies, as the grain price is generally higher in NWFP than it is in the Punjab. Furthermore, if the alternative to ADA seed is seed from the PSC, seed prices in NWFP should tend to be higher because of transportation costs. The higher grain price in NWFP also means the seed-to-grain price ratio is lower in NWFP than in the Punjab.The system of multiplying and distributing improved wheat seed has changed for the better in the Punjab under the PSC and in NWFP, but there is room for improvement. Pakistan and other countries could benefit from long-term planning in determining absent from seed production policy. Furthermore, coordination among institutions that formulate policy and those that implement seed production programs is essential. For example, since the seed production cycle in Pakistan presently takes three to four years, seed production policy should be planned and implemented accordingly. Possible changes in seed production planning include streamlined varietal testing, multiplication of promising lines before they are released as varieties, and greater coordination between the PSC, the Varietal Evaluation Committee, and the Federal Committee on Agriculture.Actual physical capacity to multiply seed is the least binding constraint faced by the PSC, although production and processing might be improved. For example, multiplication ratios could be improved either through changing agronomic practices or reviewing quality standards to ensure they are not overly stringent. The location of seed production farms could be diversified and seed could be increased out of season. Unfinished seed processing plants should be completed. Because improved marketing will increase seed demand, these physical production changes may become more urgent in the future.In Pakistan some possibilities for developing a well-coordinated, integrated, and expanded seed marketing system include:• Offering higher, uniform commissions to final sales agents;• Relying more on private sector seed marketing;• Relaxing the \"cash and carry\" condition to some extent;• Closer PSC monitoring of its production and marketing costs;• Experimenting with smaller packages, more distinctive packaging, and greater sales promotion;• Taking more realistic approaches to seed certification and consume protection;• Improving coordination between various sections of the PSC, especially stores and marketing: and• Conducting more regular market research.Expanding the seed distribution network and offering greater incentives to retailers will necessitate increasing the final seed price. Marketing margins will have to become consistent with those presently offered for fertilizer in Pakistan and for seed in other countries. Seed prices in Pakistan are currently low relative to grain prices.The ratio of seed price to grain price is 1.5, compared to around 1. 7 for developing countries worldwide. In many Asian countries, including India, the ratio is 2 or more (Gregg 1983;Singh 1985;Katya11987;Tunwar 1987), yet wheat varietal replacement is faster in the Punjab of India than in the Punjab of Pakistan. 13 Experiences in other countries suggest that private dealers generally require a margin of 20% to encourage them to participate in seed marketing. This is at least double what dealers currently receive from PAD&SC.Even if the price ratio were raised to 2 (for example, by paying 15% commissions to retail dealers and registered growers), for farmers the desired time period for replacing the varieties they grow would not rise to more than six or eight years under reasonable parameter assumptions (Chapter 2). If higher seed prices make seed more widely available and allow greater promotion of seed, it is highly likely that the aggregate weighted mean age of varieties will decrease. Even if the varietal life span favored by farmers were as high as eight years, mean age of varieties would decrease if time between a variety's release and availability to farmers were reduced to four years or less, an entirely reasonable goal for the seed system.Chapter III IKhaleel A. Tetlay, Paul W. Heisey, Zulfiqar Ahmed, and Munir AhmadEfforts to improve the pace of varietal replacement will benefit from information gathered at the farm level to determine where farmers get the wheat seed they use, where they get seed when they decide to change varieties, and how they manage seed retained from their own fields. l Data for the study described in this chapter were collected in 1986 during the survey of constraints to the rapid diffusion of new, disease-resistant wheats. Social scientists from the Pakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC) administered detailed interviews to 146 farmers in the 30 villages selected in the rice-wheat zone; 149 farmers in the 30 villages in the cotton-wheat zone; and 99 farmers in the 20 villages in irrigated Mardan. (Survey locations are depicted in Figure 1.1.) Further details about the surveys can be found in Tetlay et al. (1987c).Data from the three survey areas are broadly similar but nevertheless reveal certain contrasts. Some differences relate to the fact that the seed system in North West Frontier Province (NWFP) is more rudimentary than in the Punjab. Others relate to contrasts between the two cropping areas in the Punjab (recall that seed production and distribution in the Punjab is particularly concentrated in the cotton zone ). Seed depot density cannot be calculated exactly for the three survey areas because data on depots are only available at the district level. However, if we calculate density of seed outlets for the districts where the survey areas were located, the results confirm high density in the cotton zone and low density in Mardan (Table 5.1). Another difference among the areas is that newer wheat releases were more widely diffused in the rice zone than in the cotton zone at the time of the surveys, largely because WL-711, a high yielding, well-adapted but rust susceptible variety, was dominant in the cotton zone.1 A more comprehensive account of this research can be found in Tetlay et al. (1987a) and Heisey et al. (n.d.).In this chapter and the next, \"new varieties\" at the time of the 1986 surveys are those released in 1979 or thereafter, since those varieties were in most cases in the initial stages of adoption. When the survey was taken, Punjab-81 had already been banned north of Faisalabad because of stripe rust susceptibility (i.e. in the rice zone, where it is grown, and in Mardan, where it is not), but it is included as a new variety because the factors influencing its adoption resemble those influencing the adoption of other new varieties.2Farmers' Sources of Wheat Seed In all three areas, the most common source of wheat seed planted in 1985/86 was seed retained from the previous year's crop (Figure 5.1). Roughly one-fifth to one quarter of the farmers got their seed from other farmers. Some 10% or fewer purchased seed at a depot.3An examination of some of the more popular varieties in each zone clarifies patterns of seed acquisition. Obviously, farmers planting older varieties were more likely to have been planting them longer and to be using retained seed. On the other hand, farmers planting new varieties were more likely to have obtained their seed from a seed depot. Some evidence indicates that the source of seed of new varieties, notably Pak-81, was more often other farmers, whereas seed of old varieties was less likely to be obtained from other farmers (Tables 5.2 to 5.4).Patterns of seed acquisition become more evident if we look at farmers' sources of seed for new varieties the first time they plant them. As expected, seed depots were the major initial seed source for farmers in the two zones in the Punjab but were much less important in Mardan, where the seed system is less developed. Looking at all three zones together, it is apparent that other farmers were the source of seed for about half the farmers who started growing a new variety (Figure 5.2).Some farmers in Mardan first got Seed of new varieties from research or extension.The \"other\" category in Mardan usually refers to cases in which farmers said they got seed at a depot, but did not know the depot's correct location; it is likely that some of that seed came from research or extension.2 In recent years, Punjab-81 has been declining in area in the rice-wheat zone both because the PSC no longer makes its seed available there and because it has proven to be particularly susceptible to shattering (see Chapter 3 and Chaudhry et al. 1985).3 The \"other\" category for the two Punjab zones refers to farmers who got seed from a variety of sources. In Mardan, the analysis was done by fields, so sources did not overlap. a \"Mexipak\" is often used as a generic name for semidwarf wheat in Mardan; it usually refers to an older high yielding variety that the farmer has been growing for a considerable time (Chapter 3). -Fanners who first acquired seed of new varieties from the depot tended to be larger fanners (Table 5.5), whereas smaller farmers more often got seed of new releases from other farmers. In Mardan, because of the smaller numbers involved, research and extension are grouped with the seed depot as an initial source of seed because they represent a fonnal institution rather than the infonnal but powerful mechanism of farmer-to-fanner seed more of the fanners who initially obtained new varieties from other Rice zone < 10 ha 22 fanners said their source was a farmer L 10 ha 6 with less than 10 ha (Table 5.6). Source Cotton zone < 10 ha 43 farmers were also close to the farmers L 10 ha 6 Mardan < 10 ha 19 they served; over half the fanners who L 10 ha 71 got seed from other farmers contacted someone in their own village and over Note: Research/extension applies only to 80% received seed from a farmer within a Mardan.5-km radius (Table 5.7). 4 In Mardan, farms are quite small so the 10-ha division between \"small farms\" and \"large farms\" is less appropriate than in the Punjab. Forty-six percent of all farmers with over 4 ha initially got seed of new varieties from a seed depot, research, or extension, whereas 24% of the farmers with under 4 ha got new wheat seed from these sources. It seems likely that in Mardan it is primarily the very largest farmers who have contact with formal seed sources.-In all three survey areas, over 90% of farmers planting new varieties said they had no problems obtaining seed. Three-quarters or more financed the seed with their own money; the other significant way of obtaining seed was to exchange grain for seed with another farmer (one-sixth to one-fifth of the farmers got their new seed that way). Yet in both the rice and cotton zones, around half ofthe farmers who knew about new varieties but had not planted them said seed was unavailable. This was the most common reason given for not planting new varieties. In Mardan, the same explanation was given by 9 of the 24 farmers who knew about new varieties but were not planting them.About half the farmers in all three zones knew the correct location of the nearest seed depot. Some farmers in each zone said they knew the location but did not identify it correctly, an occurrence much more common in Mardan than in the Punjab (Table 5.8). Mardan District has only two Agricultural Development Authority (ADA) depots, one in Mardan and one in Swabi, although there are other ways in which seed can be distributed. Significantly more farmers in the Punjab who were aware of new varieties (they were already planting them or had heard of them) knew the correct location of the depot nearest them. In Mardan, there was no relationship between varietal awareness and accurate knowledge of the seed depot.Over one-third of the farmers surveyed in the rice and cotton zones had actually visited a seed depot whereas only one-fifth of the farmers in Mardan had done so (Table 5.8). As farmers who had visited a depot are a subset of those who knew the depot location, factors related to visits are likely to resemble factors related to knowledge of the depot. In the Punjab, farmers planting new varieties were more likely to have visited a seed depot. In Mardan, there was no relationship between the two variables.Many variables can influence whether or not a farmer knows the location of the nearest seed depot or visits it: human capital variables such as literacy; farm size and tenure variables; information sources, such as agricultural extension; or a Includes only farmers with correct knowledge of depot location.distance from the depot. Variables used in the analysis reported below are defined in Table 5.9. Since these variables are unlikely to operate independently, a variable-by variable analysis of relationships with knowledge of seed depots or visits to them is likely to be misleading (Feder, Just, and Zilberman 1985). Instead, probit analysis, which uses a number of independent variables, has been used to predict the probability of whether or not a given farmer knew the location of the seed depot, and also to predict whether or not the farmer had visited a depot.Several equations were estimated for each of the three zones. Results of one of the better equations for each zone (better in terms of goodness of fit as determined by the regression chi-squared statistic) are presented in Tables 5.10 and 5.11.5 This approach is not entirely satisfactory because there are likely to be causal relationships between some of the explanatory variables. However, the results help determine which variables are more likely than others to predict farmers' contact with the seed depot. -The results are consistent with our expectations, except for several anomalous relationships in the smaller Mardan sample. Literacy is the key human capital variable, positively related to knowledge of and visits to the seed depot in the rice zone and in Mardan. In the cotton zone, literacy is not significant at standard levels but the coefficient does have asymptotic t-values significant at the .20 level. In Mardan, a quadratic age specification is also significant, implying that as a farmer's age increases up to the mid-forties, the farmer is more likely to know where the seed depot is or to have actually visited it; after that increasing age reduces the probability. Extension contact is the main information source related to contact with the seed depot. In the rice and cotton zones, farmers who had seen extension personnel within the last year were significantly more likely to know where the seed depot was. In the rice zone and Mardan, extension contact was significantly related to visits to the seed depot. There was an anomalous result regarding information sources in Mardan, where farmers who had listened to agricultural programming on the radio within the last month appeared less likely to have visited the seed depot. Variables related to general status or resource base, such as farm size, tenure, or social status, are mostly insignificant or anomalous. Increasing farm size did appear to increase the likelihood of seed depot knowledge in the rice zone, but the effect in Mardan was negative. All in all, farm size bore little relationship to seed depot knowledge or contact. This finding does not necessarily contradict earlier indications that larger farmers planting a new variety for the first time were more likely to acquire seed of the variety at a seed depot. What the present results seem to indicate is that larger farmers have significantly higher levels of literacy and extension contacts and, once these other variables are taken into account, farm size does not have much of an effect one way or the other on their contact with the seed depot.The most anomalous result is the highly significant negative effect of social status in Mardan. 6 Social status also appeared to be negatively related to depot visits in Mardan, but positively related in the cotton zone.?In the cotton zone, where retail seed outlets are most concentrated, farmers located farther from the depot were less likely to know where it was or to visit it. The relationships were also negative in the rice zone, but not significant at standard levels. There were no relationships in Mardan, where the formal seed system is a much less active agent of varietal diffusion.From year to year, the most signi'ficant source of wheat seed is seed that farmers retain themselves. Farmers in the three surveyed areas were asked if they managed seed crops any differently from the rest of their grain: did they select a special field for seed, or thresh and store seed separately from other grain?Farmers in the rice zone and Mardan were somewhat more likely than cotton zone farmers to choose a separate field for seed, either before or at harvest. Over all three zones, 40-50% of surveyed farmers threshed and stored seed apart from the rest of their grain (Table 5.12). Threshing seed separately was the criterion for determining if the farmer made special efforts to preserve seed quality. The few farmers who stored seed separately without threshing it separately were not included in the \"special seed management\" group for further analysis.6 In Mardan, only 17 farmers had positive social status, a rather crudely defined variable referring to farmers who were village officials, ran shops, and so on. Nearly all of these farmers were literate. However, literate farmers without \"social status\" were significantly more likely to identify seed depot location correctly than literate farmers with status. Perhaps farmers with status were more familiar with non-ADA seed sources such as research farms or extension offices.7 When the social status dummy is left out of the estimating equation in the cotton zone, the coefficient for literacy becomes significant at the .05 level, suggesting that the \"social status'\" variable may be picking up some of the same influence as the literacy variable did in the other zones.Very few other characteristics of farmers could be related to whether or not they used special seed management practices. In both the rice zone and Mardan, seed management practices of farmers planting new varieties did not differ from practices of farmers who did not plant them . Farmers in the cotton zone who planted new varieties were significantly more likely to manage their seed to maintain quality.Since few farmer characteristics were related to seed management on a variable-by variable basis , no probit analysis was done to predict whether or not a farmer would thresh seed separately from grain . A few variables did appear to affect seed management when analyzed individually. With increasing farm size, the likelihood increased that farmers in the rice and cotton zones threshed seed separately; in the rice zone and Mardan, farmers who had contact with extension in the last year appeared more likely to thresh seed separately.The evidence presented in this chapter confirms that the major source of wheat seed is seed retained from the previous year's crop. The next most frequent source of seed is other farmers. Less than 10% of farmers surveyed obtained seed at a depot. Fewer than half of the farmers who retained their own seed sought to ensure its purity by selecting or threshing it separately.When farmers change varieties, other farmers are the most important source of seed.In the Punjab, where the seed system is better developed, seed depots are almost equally important as a source of seed when farmers want to change varieties. In Mardan seed depots are much less significant as an initial source of new seed . In the Punjab farmers planting new varieties are significantly more likely to know where the seed depot is and to have visited it; in Mardan there is no relationship between planting new varieties and contact with the seed depot. Farmers with larger Table 5.12. Farmers' seed management practices for retained wheat seed A number of associated farmer characteristics appear to influence whether farmers know about or have visited the seed depot and whether they manage seed and grain crops differently. The most consistent explanatory variables are literacy and contact with extension . Farm size does seem to make a difference in one case--initial source of new seed. Larger farmers may also be more likely to manage seed differently than grain. With regard to seed policy it should be noted that more often than not new seed enters a village when a larger farmer obtains it from the formal seed system. Seed then spreads from farmer to farmer within the village or spreads to an adjoining village. Farmer-to-farmer seed diffusion is highly localized, as fewer than 10% offarmers obtain seed from a village more than 10 km away. Despite the strengthening of the formal seed production and distribution system, informal, farmer-to-farmer seed transfer clearly remains a major means of diffusing seed, as in the early days of the Green Revolution (Lowdermilk 1972).Chapter 1mPaul W. Heisey, Khaleel A. Tetlay, Zulfiqar Ahmed, and Munir Ahmad This chapter seeks to explain factors related to farmers' awareness and adoption of newer wheat releases. Certain traits of farmers and varieties explain a two-step process in which a farmer first becomes aware of new varieties and later adopts them.'•2Griliches ' (1957) classic study of the spread of hybrid maize in the USA has been succeeded by a vast literature on the adoption of agricultural innovations. 3 Much of the literature concerns itself with the adoption curve, an S-shaped cumulative frequency curve, which can refer either to the aggregate level or to individual farmers. 4 In Pakistan, adoption of high yielding varieties (HYVs) followed the classic S-shaped pattern. But the replacement of individual wheat varieties is more completely represented as a process of adoption and disadoption (Brennan and Cullis 1987), a pattern visible in Figure 2.2 (page 14) where the area covered by major wheat varieties in Punjab is shown. During the adoption phase, the curve is similar to the monotonically increasing curve usually studied .In 1985/86, at the time of the adoption survey discussed in this chapter, cross sectional differences in farmers' awareness and adoption of new varieties were distributed as in Table 6.1. The data in Table 6.1 are consistent with the area estimates of Chapter 3 , where it was noted that the spread of new varieties in the 1 This chapter is partially based on material in Tetlay et al. (1987b and1987c).2 For a technical description of the type of model used here, see Maddala (1983).3 This literature is summarized in Feder, Just, and Zilberman (1985).4 At the aggregate level for a given innovation, the height of this cumulative frequency curve at a given time can be measured in different ways. For individual farmers , adoption curves show the degree to which the farmer uses the input(s) of interest.rice-wheat zone was greater than in the two other areas at the time of the survey. Farmers in the rice zone who grew new varieties tended to have grown them for less than the average length of time; farmers in Mardan, for more. In other words, new varieties appear to have diffused faster in the rice zone than in the other two areas, a conclusion further supported by the aggregate data of Chapter 3. Diffusion of new wheat varieties has been somewhat slower in Mardan because the seed system is less developed. Although seed outlets are more heavily concentrated in the cotton zone than in the rice zone, diffusion in the rice zone has proceeded faster because the older varieties in the cotton zone are particularly well adapted to the zone's environment and crop rotations.Perceptions of technological components for increasing wheat productivity-In the 1985/86 adoption survey, farmers were asked to identify which technological components were most important, second most important, and third most important for increasing wheat yields. They did not identify variety as a major component. Any attempt to determine which factors were most important to farmers is subject to ambiguity because individual choices can be weighted differently, but it is clear that in all three zones better land preparation ranked highest and more fertilizer second. In the three zones, variety ranked between third and fifth.In diagnostic surveys conducted in the same zones (Byerlee et al. 1986), variety was found to be one factor strongly affecting farmers' yields. For direct technology transfer, variety was among the highest priorities in each area. The difference between the relative importance attached to variety by researchers and farmers may be related to several factors. First, differences in yield due to variety might not be immediately evident prior to harvest. Second, seed is a relatively small amount of farmers' production cost and farmers might tend to weight the importance of an input in proportion to its cost. Finally, the fact that the new varieties were, in general, diffusing slowly at the time of the study meant that farmers had relatively few opportunities to compare yields of old and new varieties.Farmers' perceptions of the disease threat-During the survey, farmers were asked about major diseases affecting wheat; 70-90% of them were aware of rust. (In the rice and cotton zones, about 90% mentioned smut, noted by only 55% of the farmers in Mardan.) Of the farmers who knew about rust, half to three-quarters called it \"a problem\" (Table 6.2). But even though many farmers knew about rust and some thought it a problem, relatively few farmers in Punjab thought it could recur. The different results for Punjab and Mardan were probably caused by the way 5 Farmers in Punjab were asked whether or not they agreed with the statement, \"Rust used to be a problem but it is no longer a problem;\" in Mardan, they were asked whether or not they agreed with the statement, \"Rust could be a problem again in the future.\"-----the question was phrased in the survey areas. s This question probably influenced the answers to subsequent questions about differences in varietal rust resistance and loss of resistance over time.One-quarter of the respondents in Punjab thought some varieties were more resis tant than others; in Mardan the proportion was a little less than half. In all zones, half or less of the farmers who thought some varieties were more resistant than others thought that resistant varieties could lose their resistance. Since more far mers in Mardan agreed with the statement on differential rust resistance, a simil arly larger proportion there thought resistant varieties could break down (Table 6.2).Regardless of problems with some of the questions about rust, it is clear that in all surveyed areas farmers' knowledge of disease was rather limited. Relationships linking farmers' characteristics to disease knowledge variables were generally not significant. 6 Farmers' awareness of rust as a major problem would probably be much greater in a year immediately following an epidemic. Similarly, awareness would be greater among farmers growing a particularly susceptible variety in a year immediately after that variety suffered noticeable yield losses from rust. But in a relatively normal year some years after farmers have experienced serious losses from rust, the threat of disease by itself is unlikely to motivate farmers to change varieties, given the current state of their knowledge about varietal rust resistance and rust epidemics. 6 Nonetheless, in the rice zone and Mardan, farmers who planted or knew about new varieties did seem more likely to believe that some varieties are more resistant than others. In Mardan, literacy and extension contact seemed to be positively related to a belief in differential varietal resistance; extension contact, radio contact, and social status seemed positively related in the rice zone; and in the cotton zone, younger farmers and farm owners appeared more likely to believe some varieties had greater resistance. Given the very limited numbers of farmers who thought resistant varieties could break down, in only one case did a farmer characteristic appear to affect this belief: extension contact in the cotton zone. It is likely that in a multivariate analysis the apparent significance of some of these variables might disappear.Reasons for varietal choice--Variety was not the first factor farmers thought of when they were asked what was most important for increasing yield. But when farmers growing new varieties were asked why they had changed from old to new cultivars, they cited yield more than any other reason (Table 6.3). The other frequent responses for changing variety were yield decline or clisease susceptibility of the old variety; they are also related to a difference in yields. Some farmers who noted that new varieties yielded better also mentioned the yield decline of old varieties; unfortunately, data from two of the survey areas do not permit all factors to be separated out. Even though farmers' awareness of disease is rather low, it is worth noting that losses from clisease are sometimes part of the yield comparison that motivates varietal change.When farmers planting old and new varieties were asked why they planted both types, the most common response across all three zones was that they wanted to compare the performance of each type. In addition, 30-40% of the farmers in each zone planted both types for reasons related to diversification: they wanted one variety for late planting or one for home consumption, or simply wanted to avoid risk (Table 6.4). Farm size was a highly significant determinant of the number of varieties planted. In all three zones, mean farm size for farmers planting more than one wheat variety was much larger than for farmers planting only one variety.7\"Objective\" varietal characteristics and farmer behavio~everal characteristics besides superior grain yield are often thought to influence farmers to plant new varieties: straw yields (Husain 1987), taste and baking quality, and resistance to moisture stress (Byerlee et a1. 1986). To see if particular varietal a Farmers sometimes mentioned declining yield or disease losses of the old variety as well as higher yields of the new variety. However, in some of the survey areas it is not possible to recover how many farmers mentioned these factors in conjunction with higher yields.7 Diversification over old and new varieties was one of the few ways in which farm size did appear to affect varietal diffusion, if other variables were taken into account. See footnote 14.characteristics had induced farmers to adopt new varieties, some \"objective\" measures of varietal characteristics were examined along with evidence of farmers' behavior regarding each characteristic.Yield-Data from the ISWYN and Khanewal seed farm trials, analyzed in Chapter 2, can be used to compare grain yields of several popular wheat varieties. At \"normal\" planting dates, the new variety Pak-81 yields better than all other varieties considered here. The old variety WL-711 also yields more than other important varieties, and the old variety Sandal may also yield somewhat better. Four other varieties (Punjab-81, Blue Silver, Bahawalpur-79, and Yecora) yield about the same under identical management conditions, although one trial ranks them in the order in which they have just been listed (for our purposes, Punjab-81 and Bahawalpur-79 are considered new varieties).Yield and planting date-In all three survey areas, farmers plant wheat at dates which are later than optimal, a practice strongly related to the previous crop in the rotation and seen most frequently in the cotton-wheat cropping system (Byerlee et al. 1986). Thus, not only yield performance per se but also yield performance at late planting dates may affect farmers' choice of varieties.Plant breeders usually try to develop early maturing varieties for circumstances in which the growing season is curtailed. Among the varieties listed earlier, Blue Silver and Bahawalpur-79 are short season releases recommended for late planting. The new variety Faisalabad-83, not widely grown, and the old rust susceptible variety s SA-42, common in Mardan, are also short season varieties. Some farmers offered more than one reason; the most prominent is recorded here. Only 14 farmers in Mardan planted both old and new varieties.8 WL-711 is an intermediate maturity variety, one of the reasons it has fit so well into the cropping system in the cotton-wheat zone, but for simplicity it will be analyzed with the full season varieties.A second approach taken by researchers to the constraint oflate planting, particularly in areas where heat stress is a problem, is to plant a variety late and evaluate its performance regardless of whether it is supposed to be an early, intermediate, or late maturing variety. Under this criterion, at late planting dates Pak-81, a relatively long season variety, continues to perform very well with respect to the short season varieties Blue Silver and Bahawalpur-79; WL-7ll also may perform somewhat better. Punjab-81 does well at late planting, but the yields of old varieties Sandal and Yecora decline greatly when they are planted late (Hobbs 1985; Chapter 2).Crop rotation and variety--Crop rotation and varietal characteristics combine to influence farmers' varietal choices in different ways in the three survey areas. In the cotton zone, where late planting is common, both normal season and short season varieties were planted late (Figure 6.1). Larger farmers in all three zones were more likely to plant more than one variety. In the cotton zone, however, farm size did not vary between farmers planting a short season variety and those who did not. All varieties chosen, whether by the larger farmers who tended to plant more than one variety or the smaller farmers who planted only one, had to perform relatively well at late planting.In the rice zone somewhat less wheat is planted late, although planting dates vary more from year to year than they do in the cotton zone. Figure 6.1 shows that, in contrast to the cotton zone, in the rice zone short season varieties were usually planted later than full season varieties. Furthermore, farmers planting short season varieties tended to have more land than farmers who did not. These factors suggest that farmers in the rice zone often choose full season varieties for earlier planting and early maturing varieties for later planting. (Their choice probably relates to the fact that Yecora, once the dominant variety in the rice zone, suffers heavy yield losses at late planting.) Also, larger farmers in the rice zone may have a wider range of wheat planting dates than do smaller farmers, and thus be more likely to switch to an early variety at the later dates.Mardan presents a different picture of farmers' choices of variety and planting date.In the sample analyzed here, late planting was less common than in either the cotton or the rice zone (Figure 6 variety to another, straw yield is probably less significant, although it may be more important in Mardan than in Punjab, as fodder prices tend to be higher in NWFP.9 However, it is hypothesized that harvest indices between one HYV and another are similar enough to imply that a strong positive correlation usually exists between straw yield and grain yield.Seed shrivelling-An independent assessment of shrivelling characteristics of wheat varieties is not readily available. A variety's shrivelling characteristics are probably related to its performance when it is planted late. There was not much evidence from the survey, however, that farmers' evaluation of shrivelling characteristics was significantly related to their judgement of how a variety performed when it was planted late.Seed shattering-Data on important commercial varieties' susceptibility to shattering are not readily available. However, Punjab-81 has been found to be relatively susceptible, both in trials designed to evaluate this trait (Chaudhry et al. 1985) and in farmers' experience.Baking quality-Although baking quality can be evaluated by such objective measures as gluten strength, in this study it was treated essentially as a subjective judgement and is discussed in the next section.Subjective varietal characteristics--Farmers in the survey who were either planting new varieties or knew about them were asked to compare characteristics of a specific old variety that they had planted or were planting with those of a specific new variety they were planting or knew about. For each characteristic, farmers were asked whether they thought the new variety was better, the old variety was better, or both varieties were the same. \"Don't know\" responses were also recorded.In the rice zone, responses of farmers already planting new varieties differed significantly from the responses of farmers who had only heard of new varieties, for all characteristics. As expected, farmers with no direct experience of new varieties were more likely not to have an opinion. Also as expected, a larger proportion of farmers planting new varieties evaluated them favorably. Their positive opinions were strongest for grain and straw yield, intermediate for late planting performance and shrivelling, and weakest for shattering resistance and chapati (baking) quality. 9 In fact, though grain-to-straw ratios are higher for HYVs than for the varieties they replaced, greater biomass production may still 'lead to higher straw production from fields sown to semidwarfs. Nonetheless, perceptions are important: Husain (1987) demonstrates that even today, in mountainous areas of northern Pakistan, farmers believe the traditional varieties produce more straw than the HYVs although objective yield cuts show per hectare straw production to be about equal. Straw quality may also be an issue.In fact, fanners planting new varieties, as well as farmers who were not, were more likely to say that the old variety had more shattering resistance and made better ckapatis. This response was particularly striking for ckapati quality (Table 6.5). These evaluations are probably related to the relatively greater use ofPunjab-81 (which is particularly subject to shattering) in the rice-wheat zone, and a preference for Yecora for quality.In the cotton zone, differences between nonadopters and adopters were also significant for all characteristics. Even more than in the rice zone, farmers who had only heard of new varieties were less likely than farmers who had adopted them to voice an opinion about their characteristics. For all characteristics, adopters were more likely to rate the new variety more favorably and nonadopters to rate the old one more favorably. Adopters were most likely to give favorable ratings for late planting perfonnance and general yield performance; they gave the lowest ratings for shattering and shrivelling characteristics (Table 6.6).In Mardan, differences between adopters and nonadopters were significant only for opinions on yield. Adopters overwhelmingly favored their new variety and nonadopters were more likely to support the old one. Although the differences among a Row \"P\" refers to farmers who plant new varieties. Row \"K\" refers to farmers who know about new varieties but do not plant them.m ~~---..---------------------------adopters' and nonadopters' opinions of chapati quality, shattering resistance, and shrivelling resistance were not significant, adopters were more likely to favor the new variety and nonadopters the old. Adopters were more likely than nonadopters to say the old variety gave the Same or more straw. Finally, both adopters and nonadopters were more likely to favor the old variety for late planting (Table 6.7).Farmers' Awareness and Adoption of New Wheat VarietiesVariables affecting awareness and adoption-Even a relatively simple change, such as starting to plant a new semidwarf wheat variety, is influenced by complex, interrelated factors, just as when seed-fertilizer technology was first adopted in irrigated Pakistan (Lowdermilk 1972). Adoption is analyzed here as a two-stage process in which the farmer first becomes aware of a new variety and then adopts it. That approach is particularly useful in a situation like this, when, four to five years after the release of several good new varieties, one-third or more of the surveyed farmers had not heard of them. a Row \"P\" refers to farmers who plant new varieties. Row \"K\" refers to farmers who know about new varieties but do not plant them.Probit analysis was used to study the effects of several factors operating simultaneously. Although probit analysis does not take into account the likely interaction of some of the explanatory variables, it is preferable to two-way variable by-variable analysis. The variables, some of which are the same as those defined in Chapter 5, are defined in Table 6.8. Several human capital variables were used. Age may be thought of as a partial proxy for experience. A quadratic specification for age was employed in many of the equations estimated. 10 A literacy dummy, LIT, distinguishes literate from illiterate farmers. Education level dummy EDI denoted farmers with one to eight years of education, and ED2 refers to farmers with more than eight years of education. 10 This implies that, if coefficients were significant and of the proper sign, experience increased the likelihood of awareness up to a point where it began to be outweighed, perhaps, by greater conservatism. In general, the quadratic specification was somewhat more likely to improve the fit or result in significant coefficients than either linear or logarithmic specifications.-We also used two other variables that often appear in the adoption literature: farm size (in our analysis we used LNSIZE, the natural logarithm offarm size in hectares) and a dummy, OWN, distinguishing farm owners and part owners from tenants. Farm size may have an independent effect because a relatively fixed cost of acquiring information is spread over a larger area (Feder and Slade 1984), or because larger farmers may have greater access to information or credit. Variables for two \"modern\" sources of information were employed. The first is a dummy variable, EXT, distinguishing whether or not the farmer had any direct contact with extension in the year immediately preceding the survey. The second, RADIO, is another dummy variable dividing farmers into those who had listened to agricultural programming on the radio over the previous year and those who had not.In this context it is interesting to note which initial sources of information about new varieties were most frequently identified by the farmers themselves. The most important source, cited by half or more of the farmers in all three zones, was other farmers (Table 6.9). This finding, in conjunction with the finding that other farmers were often the first source of seed for new varieties, reinforces the conclusion that local sources of information about new wheat technology remain nearly as important as they were when the Green Revolution began (Lowdermilk 1972).Farmers interviewed for this study mentioned extension as a major source of information slightly more often than farmers in Lowdermilk's study. Extension was mentioned more frequently in the cotton zone and Mardan, where adoption was slower, than in the rice zone. This response corresponds to Lowdermilk's findings. In earlier stages of adoption, farmers in contact with formal sources of information are more likely to be adopting the new technology.Two alternative variables were used to reflect village effects. The first, VIL, was the percentage area planted to new varieties in the surveyed village as identified by the breeders (Chapter 3).1l The second was a dummy, ROAD, indicating whether or not the farmer's village was on a metalled road. ----------------------------The variables described above were used to predict whether or not a farmer would be aware of new varieties. In addition, four opinion variables were added to the analysis of adoption for those farmers aware of new varieties. Since the opinion variables were highly interrelated, variables for straw yield and shrivelling were dropped. For the others (yield, chapati quality, late planting performance, and shattering resistance), dummies were included with a value of one if the farmer thought the new variety was clearly superior with respect to the characteristic and zero if the farmer favored the old variety, thought them both the same, or did not know. The chapati/baking quality variable was dropped from the cotton zone equation as its inclusion led to instability in the coefficients of the other variables.Awareness of new varieties--The multivariate analysis uses some of the variables described above to predict the probability that a farmer was aware of new varieties. This analysis had most predictive power, and more coefficients were significant with the expected signs, for the rice zone, where diffusion of new varieties had proceeded farthest at the time of the survey.Across all zones, the human capital variables most strongly related to awareness of new varieties were education and literacy. In the cotton zone, farmers with some education were significantly more likely to be aware of new varieties than farmers with no education. In the rice zone, farmers with more than eight years of education were much more likely to know about new varieties. Age coefficients were significant in the rice zone, implying that, as a farmer's aged increased (up to the late forties), so did the likelihood that the farmer would know about new varieties; after the late forties, the likelihood decreased (Table 6.10).Only in Mardan did increasing farm size significantly increase the probability that the farmer would be aware of new varieties. In the rice zone, owners were somewhat more likely than tenants to know about new varieties.Contact with information sources was significant only in the rice zone. Farmers who listened to agricultural radio programs were much more likely to be aware of new varieties; extension contact also had a significant effect. However, given that most farmers said they first learned about new varieties from other farmers, it is likely that radio and extension contact did not cause varietal awareness. Rather, farmers who actively sought agricultural information through these and other channels were also more likely to know about new varieties. 12 In contrast to the results for formal information sources, which are limited and difficult to interpret, characteristics of the village in which the farmer lived did seem to have an effect on whether a farmer had heard about new varieties. In both the rice ----- zone and Mardan, the larger the proportion of total village wheat area covered by new varieties, as estimated by the breeders' survey (Chapter 3), the greater the likelihood a farmer living in that village would know about new varieties. 13 In the cotton zone, the results were less striking. Nonetheless, farmers in villages on paved roads were more likely to know about new varieties.These results show that across zones two factors were more likely than others to significantly influence awareness of new varieties. One was education or literacy, which was positively related to varietal awareness in both Punjab zones. Literacy was also a significant determinant of seed depot knowledge in Mardan (Chapter 5), suggesting that literate farmers are generally more likely to have information about new agricultural technology. The other factor significantly influencing awareness of new varieties was the village in which the farmer was located. This result strengthens the conclusion that farmer-to-farmer transfer of information as well as seed is a basic channel of communication for wheat technology. Farm size was an important factor only in Mardan, where the seed system is least developed, diffusion of new varieties was not as advanced at the time of the survey, and fewer farmers in the survey were literate.Adoption ofnew wheat varieties-Once farmers are aware of new varieties, the major factor influencing adoption appears to be farmers' perceptions of a new variety's characteristics compared to those of the variety they are growing.Responses of farmers who knew about new varieties were analyzed to determine whether or not they would be planting one or more of the new wheat releases. Few of the other variables used in the analysis of varietal awareness were significant in distinguishing farmers who planted new varieties from those who only knew about them (Table 6.11). The quadratic specification for age was significant only in the cotton zone. Literacy was significant in Mardan, but the sign was in the wrong direction. Increasing farm size raised the probability that a farmer had adopted a new variety in the cotton zone and Mardan. This suggests the hypothesis that large farmers may be somewhat more likely to be early adopters of new varieties. In the rice zone, on the other hand, where diffusion of post-1978 releases had proceeded the farthest at the time of the survey, farm size had no significant effect on adoption.14 13 Though it is clear that village location was an important determinant of varietal awareness, attempts to explain why one village would have a greater proportion of wheat area under new varieties than another, in terms of other village characteristics, were unsuccessful.14 Another effect offarm size is not visible in the probit analysis separating adopters from nonadopters. Larger farmers were more likely to plant both a new variety and an old variety. Smaller farmers were more likely to specialize in either a single old variety or a single new variety. This relates to the relationship already noted between farm size and number of varieties planted. It is also visible in a logit analysis that predicts the probabilities that farmers fall into one of three categories: planting only old varieties, only new varieties, or planting both (Tetlay et al. 1987b). Tenure, extension contact, and village effects appeared to play no role in the actual adoption of new varieties. These results differ from those for awareness (Tables 6.10 and 6.11). The mo~t significant variables overall recorded fanners' perceptions of the new variety's perfonnance compared with that of the old variety.15 In all three zones, fanners who believed that new varieties clearly yielded better were significantly more likely to be planting them. In the cotton zone and the rice zone, opinions concerning late planting perfonnance were also important. This variable was particularly significant in the cotton zone, as one might expect given th~ large proportion of wheat planted late in that area.Beliefs concerning shattering resistance were important only in the rice zone. Again, this result makes sense because Punjab-81 was planted extensively in the rice zone in 1985-86 and its susceptibility to shattering is well known. In contrast, opinions on chapati quality did not significantly affect planting behavior. This means, for example, that in the rice-wheat area farmers' preference for chapatis made from Yecora did not stop them from changing to varieties perceived to be higher yielding or better for late planting.These probit regressions, while emphasizing the importance offanners' perceptions in determining adoption behavior, do not explain how fanners' opinions are formed. A partial explanation may be found in the estimated equations with the perceived characteristics variables left out. These equations, not reported here, had little explanatory power. The single variable that did become significant in the rice and cotton zones was the percentage of village wheat area covered by new varieties. In Mardan, this variable became significant at the .20 level. This suggests the hypothesis that informal village demonstration effects, in addition to increasing awareness of new varieties, might also encourage adoption by giving fanners a greater opportunity to observe favorable characteristics of the new varieties.The proportion of village wheat area planted to new varieties was obviously important in explaining varietal awareness, and possibly adoption as well. Nonetheless, obvious village characteristics such as distance to the nearest seed depot did not explain varietal proportions in simple Ordinary Least Squares regressions, nor did they explain awareness and adoption when entered directly into the probit regressions reported in Tables 6.10 and 6.11.The analysis of varietal diffusion presented here focused on two stages: infonnation and adoption . This chapter's findings tend to reinforce the conclusions of the previous one. Fanner-to-fanner transfer of both infonnation and seed plays a major role in seed diffusion. This has been seen in several ways: other farmers are an important general source of seed; other farmers are the most important source of information about new varieties; other farmers are a major source of seed of new varieties; and the proportion of wheat under new varieties in a village influences farmers' awareness of new varieties.Education or literacy appears to be the most important characteristic related to information about new varieties, seed depot location, and so on. Extension contact is more ambiguous. Findings reported in the previous chapter indicated that extension contact often appeared to be related to farmer information, but in this chapter, there were few links between extension contact and simple awareness of new varieties. At the same time, farmers in the cotton zone and Mardan, where new varieties had spread less widely at the time of the survey, were more likely to cite extension as their initial source of information about new varieties. One tentative explanation for that phenomenon is that extension is a more important source of information for early adopters (Lowdermilk 1972). Since the majority offarmers had only been growing new varieties for one or two years at the time of the survey, this hypothesis was not directly confirmed by the data. If the hypothesis were correct, it would imply that the influence of extension spreads beyond the farmers with whom extension personnel are directly in contact.Farm size appears important in several ways. Larger farmers are initially more likely to get seed of new varieties from the formal seed system; larger farmers are more likely to adopt new varieties when the overall rate of diffusion is relatively slow; and larger farmers are more likely to be partial adopters, growing old varieties along with new ones. Furthermore, large farmers are apt to be literate and have better extension contacts. These variables have been shown to affect seed depot contact, and literacy in particular influences awareness of new varieties. When diffusion begins to proceed more rapidly, the adoption behavior of larger and smaller farmers differs little except for larger farmers' greater tendency to diversify. Smaller farmers lag behind, not because they are reluctant to change, but because they are less likely to have full information about the new varieties in the initial stages of adoption because of lower literacy and fewer extension contacts.When farmers do become aware of new varieties, the most important factors determining adoption appear to be seed availability and farmers' perceptions that the new variety will yield more than their old one. Other factors , such as late planting performance or resistance to shattering, are important depending on the cropping system of a particular area or its current varietal mix.Paul W. HeiseyVarietal replacement in cereals and legumes is important to farmers because new varieties may be superior to their old ones in yield or other desirable characteristics. Furthermore, a farmer's old variety may have deteriorated in yield because of seed intermixture, loss of germination potential, loss of resistance to diseases or pests, or other genetic deterioration resulting from cross-pollination. The relative importance of these factors is related to species: cross-pollination is very important in maize and of limited interest in self-pollinating crops such as wheat or rice, whereas diseases and pests may be of greater consequence in wheat or rice than in maize. Some, but not all, of these reasons for changing variety could also influence a farmer to obtain new seed of a variety he or she already grows. In this report, however, we have presented a case study for one crop, wheat, in one country, Pakistan, and our primary interest has been varietal replacement rather than seed replacement.Policy makers may also be interested in the rate of varietal replacement. A faster rate of replacement might mean higher rates of return to research. Furthermore, compared to individual farmers, society as a whole might place a greater value on preventing epidemics of diseases and pests, and so even without institutional constraints to more rapid replacement, policy makers might want to influence the speed of varietal replacement.A large amount of literature from many disciplines has been concerned with \"Green Revolutions\"-the adoption of semidwarf wheat and rice varieties, or of hybrid maize. Green Revolutions might be viewed as instances of aggregate varietal replacement, although varietal replacement can take place at both the aggregate and the individual farmer level without being characterized as a \"revolution.\" The distinguishing feature of a Green Revolution might be a relatively dramatic increase in yield, intimately related to particular genetic characteristics (e.g., dwarfing, photoperiod insensitivity), and, at least historically, to much higher economic optima for complementary inputs such as fertilizer. The differences between the most dramatic of revolutions and the most ordinary cases of varietal replacement are, however, differences of degree rather than kind, and this study has shown that many of the factors influencing varietal change at one end of the continuum can also operate during periods of less overt technological change.This report has focused on wheat in Pakistan in the post-Green Revolution period.The following conclusions are therefore specific to crop, place, and time. However, they can also be viewed as hypotheses that might apply in different situations, perhaps after modification.! Four general areas are considered: the role of the 1 In some cases similar hypotheses have been tested in different circumstances-wheat in Australia (Brennan and Cullis 1987); soybeans in the southern USA (Houston et al. 1989).research system in supplying new varieties; the role of the seed system in disseminating new varieties; sources of information concerning the existence, availability, and characteristics of new varieties; and the influence of yield and other varietal characteristics on farmer demand for varietal replacement.The shift to reliance on a formal research system for improved crop technology, including varieties, might be an additional feature of \"Green Revolutions\" described above. Though \"science-based\" research played a part in crop improvement before periods of marked shifts in technology, it clearly became a much more identifiable source of improved germplasm during and after periods of rapid technological change. In Pakistan's Punjab, for example, contrast the total reliance on local wheat land races before 1911; the 11 varieties released between 1911 and 1965; and the 27 new varieties released between 1965 and 1985. Though maintenance research might be expected to playa larger part in the breeding effort in the post-Green Revolution period (Plucknett and Smith 1986), it is clear from the record that wheat breeding has also contributed substantially to yield gains in Pakistan since 1965.\"Green Revolutions\" in addition mark a shift from the use of seed that is selected entirely by the farmer, or obtained from other farmers, to an increasing role for a formal seed production and dissemination system. Obviously for self-pollinating crops like wheat farmers will continue to maintain their own seed supplies, as they do in the world's large cereal exporters. Nonetheless, an active seed network, closely linked with both agricultural research and extension, is a prerequisite for more rapid varietal replacement in the post-Green Revolution period. Comparing the weighted average age since release of wheat varieties (9-11 years in Pakistan's Punjab, probably longer in other parts of the country) with the weighted length of time farmers had been growing their current varieties in our survey (two-and-a-half to three years in the Punjab, somewhat over five years in Mardan) suggests that there have been significant lags between varietal release and widespread seed availability. Furthermore, many farmers who eventually get seed of more recent wheat releases from other farmers would probably buy seed from seed depots if they were aware sooner of new varieties' existence and convinced of their improved characteristics.Instead, however, seed systems are often viewed primarily as guarantors of seed quality rather than as agents of varietal replacement. Even with a shift in emphasis toward the latter role (without forsaking quality as an objective), the problems of planning seed supply and distribution remain formidable. In general, basic planning decisions, such as deciding the total amount of seed to produce, determining the mix of varieties to produce, and setting the marketing strategy, are more difficult than the more technical problems of seed production itself.The agricultural information system, particularly agricultural extension, has a rather complex influence on the process of varietal replacement both during and after periods of rapid technological change. In this study, for example, we found that contact with extension was significantly related to knowledge of the formal seed system, but in general not significantly related to varietal awareness and adoption. Some evidence, however, indicates that for early adopters extension might be an important first source of information about new varieties.Similarly, the effects of factors expected to influence farmers' ability to process information (literacy or formal education) are also complex. We have reported that these farmer characteristics do appear to influence farmers' knowledge of the formal seed system and of new varieties but do not seem to affect actual adoption behavior given varietal awareness.Much evidence suggests that the transfer of knowledge from farmer to farmer (both general information concerning new wheat technology and \"specific\" information embodied in new seed) is the single most important factor in varietal replacement. This appeared to be true both at the time of Pakistan's Green Revolution and at the time covered by this report. We hypothesize, however, that higher educational levels and more sophisticated extension messages potentially have a much greater role to play in post-Green Revolution varietal replacement.Given the effects of all these other institutional variables, farmer demand still substantially affects the rate of varietal replacement. Theoretically, many factors, including seed price and learning costs, can affect this rate (Heisey and Brennan 1989). Nonetheless we conclude that the single most important factor affecting farmers' demand for new varieties is perceived yield advantage. This factor appears both in farmers' statements and in statistical relationships attempting to explain farmers' actual behavior. Note too the slower spread of more recent wheat releases in the cotton zone of the Punjab, despite the fact that seed production and distribution in the Punjab is most concentrated in that zone. More recent releases had less yield advantage over the variety dominant at the time of our study in the cotton zone compared to other surveyed areas. 2Other varietal characteristics also affect demand, but they tend to be much more location and time specific than yield. Disease resistance per se was not found to be an important farmer consideration in this study, as farmers' knowledge of wheat diseases was rather limited. Replacement varieties must have acceptable grain quality, but in general quality has become a much less influential factor in post Green Revolution wheat production in Pakistan. 3 On the other hand, with increased emphasis on double cropping, performance at late planting has become a more 2 See Brennan and Cullis (1987) and Houston et al. (1989) for other empirical evidence from different countries on the influence of varietal characteristics, including yield, on varietal replacement and seed sales.3 Wheat grain and straw quality may still be of relatively greater importance in some parts of Pakistan, such as rainfed or mountainous areas.important criterion for wheat varieties in some areas. This, too, has probably affected varietal replacement in the cotton zone. Most of the relatively successful, more recent releases have been full-season varieties. Although they yield at least as well as earlier maturing varieties when planted late, this fact has not been widely recognized. In the cotton zone, as WL-711 continues to be phased out, it has been replaced as much by Blue Silver (an old, ear!y, and also rust-susceptible variety) as by Pak-81, a more recent full-season release that performs well at late planting (Azeem et al. 1989).This study has used a number of different methods--institutional analysis, analysis of research data, farmer surveys--to investigate wheat varietal replacement in Pakistan. To examine varietal replacement at all, one element is crucial: a reasonably reliable method of determining which varieties are grown by farmers, and over what proportion of the total crop area. Specific data sources concerning variety are unlikely to exist, but varietal information may be collected as a part of other exercises designed to estimate areas, yields, and production, or to monitor basic technological practices. Among the cereals, varietal information should be easiest to obtain for crops like hybrid maize; somewhat more difficult to elicit for self pollinating crops such as wheat or rice; and most difficult for cross-pollinating crops such as open-pollinated maize (where it is difficult to identify a variety which has become mixed over time).To analyze the productivity of wheat breeding research, we have used experimental or observational data on yield gains and on other characteristics such as disease resistance. A description of the seed production and marketing system, data concerning seed production by variety and seed pricing, and data about farmers' seed sources were employed to examine the present and potential role of the seed system in varietal replacement. Farm survey data provided us with information concerning farmers' seed sources and allowed us to analyze their knowledge of new varieties, their stated reasons for certain choices, and the statistical relationships between their characteristics and their actual behavior. All of these other methods used here may be more or less useful depending on the varietal replacement question to be considered and the costs of obtaining data.Some specific recommendations for Pakistan follow from the studies presented in this report. In some cases they may be useful in addressing problems in other countries where varietal replacement is not as rapid as might be desired. The need for appropriate policies related to varietal replacement and seed production is still as urgent in Pakistan at the start of the 1990s as it was when the research described in this report was initiated. Pak-81, released at the beginning of the 1980s, is approaching its maximum area coverage in some regions just as its resistance to rust is beginning to break down. Blue Silver has been placed on the banned list even though the area planted to Blue Silver continues to increase in parts of the Punjab. Unless policy makers, extension workers, and scientists develop a common program of action to address this problem, the farmers of Pakistan will remain vulnerable to the considerable--and growing--risk of a rust epidemic.Varietal replacement and release--The number of wheat varieties released must be maintained at least at current levels in Pakistan. Furthermore, breeders should aim to increase genetic diversity in their elite materials, as genetic diversity is a better defense against rust than varietal diversity per se. 4 Breeders should consider multiplying more seed of the most promising varieties before release. To enable earlier evaluation of a variety's commercial potential, more farmer evaluations of varieties should be sought before release. The varietal naming system should produce distinctive names that are easily recognized by farmers, rather than similar names that lead to confusion in farmers' minds. This kind of naming system would help educate farmers concerning potential differences in varieties and make varietal monitoring less difficult.Monitoring wheat varieties grown by farmers--To formulate appropriate actions aimed at promoting varietal diversity and more rapid varietal replacement, wheat scientists and policy makers (for example, in Pakistan, the members of the Federal Committee on Agriculture) must be aware which wheat varieties farmers are growing. In the Punjab, the Crop Reporting Service (CRS), Lahore, should continue varietal monitoring through farmer interviews. In other provinces, particularly Sind and NWFP, the CRSs should be encouraged to add simple varietal identification questions to their yield estimation schedules. Enumerators should be trained to avoid prompting farmers and to record \"don't know\" answers. The CRSs should work with wheat breeders and the Agricultural Economics Research Unit (AERUs) of the Pakistan Agricultural Research Council to design the questions and train enumerators.The CRS estimates of wheat varietal coverage for a given wheat season should be circulated rapidly and widely, to policy makers, wheat breeders, and pathologists, in February or March of each season. The Planning Unit, Food and Agriculture Division, Ministry of Food and Agriculture should discuss with CRSs the legitimacy of using current sampling designs to produce estimates of varietal coverage for major cropping systems. Interested institutional representatives, for example wheat researchers, should be -party to these discussions.4 Several measures to speed varietal change or promote genetic diversity do not follow directly form this report but deserve mention: streamlining varietal testing by planting National Uniform Wheat Yield Trials (NUWYTs) and microplots at the same time rather than successively; maintaining backup materials for quick multiplication in case of a rust epidemic; and developing mutlilines or varietal mixtures.Finally, the special studies discussed in Chapter 3 should be continued in the same villages sampled by the AERUs. This will permit more longitudinal analysis of the process of varietal change within given cropping systems.Seed production and marketing--Seed production capability is less of a constraint to faster dissemination of new wheat varieties than the difficulty in deciding which varieties to multiply and the lack of seed promotion. Nonetheless, potential production changes would make new varieties available more rapidly. The possibility of increasing seed out of season should be considered. Breeders currently use the Kaghan summer nursery to advance their lines; a somewhat larger facility could be used for seed production. Seed certification standards should be reviewed to see if they emphasize seed quality at the expense of rapid multiplication.Private marketing of wheat seed should be encouraged through better commissions paid to dealers. Financial incentives might be given to dealers contingent on their own active seed promotion. Eventually, marketing by registered growers, who are the last stage in the production process, should be considered.Seed of new varieties should be available in smaller packets so farmers can test and multiply their own seed. Packaging should be distinctive to maintain consumer confidence.Improved promotion and marketing of seed necessitate increases in seed price. This increase would not be incompatible with more rapid varietal replacement. Increases in the seed price should be timed to coincide with periods in which strong demand for seed is expected.Extension and demonstration of new wheat varieties--Extension, seed corporations, and research should cooperate more closely in varietal demonstrations. Demonstrations should be planted much more widely in major wheat growing areas: each village over a given size should have at least one demonstration. Seed for demonstrations should be provided to extension . Demonstrations should be grown under farmer management, and some should be planted at later than optimal planting dates. These demonstrations should be simple; they should include two or three new varieties at most, along with the farmer's variety. This contrasts with the current system in the Punjab of planting up to 10 varieties in one demonstration trial. A field day for local farmers should accompany the harvest of the demonstration plot. Seed from new varieties in demonstrations should be distributed to farmers, although extension should not be seen as the primary agent for the delivery of inputs such as seed. Extension should also increase the amount of information it makes available about wheat diseases. Radio campaigns should be stepped up to increase farmers' knowledge of new varieties and rust problems.-The case of Pakistan clearly illustrates the importance of regular varietal replacement for farmers and for the nation as a whole. The studies described in this report offer a means to evaluate the complex relationships between wheat breeding, varietal testing, and release; seed production and distribution; extension; government policy; and varietal change at the farmer level. Nonetheless there are areas in which our knowledge offactors relating to varietal replacement is limited or nonexy;tent.Future studies might, for example, develop methods of determining rough objectives for the number and genetic diversity of varieties to be released by mature plant breeding programs in countries with large areas planted to the crop in question.That kind of analysis, expanding on the methods presented in Chapter 2, should consider appropriate measures of genetic diversity (Priestly and Bayles 1980), the size and diversity of the production zones targeted, and the cost of achieving different degrees of diversity. The analysis should also consider the level of sophistication in marketing and information delivery by the seed and extension system responsible for transferring new varieties to farmers.We have highlighted the difficulties of planning seed production and supply, especially when formal seed production is seen as an instrument of varietal replacement. Further research might begin with case studies of seed systems with different degrees of success in marketing seed of different crops. Such studies do exist; what is needed is to add the perspective of varietal replacement to the legal and institutional description they often contain.Additional research is also required to verify empirically the relative strengths of the factors influencing farmers' demand for replacement seed. From the disciplinary point of view of economics, one of the more difficult conceptual issues is how to separate out availability constraints from actual demand components. In the few studies done to date relating to seed demand, including this one, availability constraints have simply been introduced as proxy variables in what is essentially an analysis of the demand side of the market. Another conceptual problem, particularly for crops for which farmers can maintain their own seed, is how to move from an abstract understanding of the factors influencing farmers to obtain seed of new varieties to a concrete set of planning tools for seed producers.Finally, studies of other countries and particularly of other crops would help to sharpen our understanding of the features of varietal replacement that are universal and of the changes in assumptions and methods necessary to analyze factors more specific to time, place, and particular crops.","tokenCount":"32012"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0125113308.json b/data/part_1/0125113308.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f2b56a027b7c0b0d9cbbbc8ceb13c7e6e4a00eb3 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0125113308.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ed2b765587942825d2fdbb23d2988632","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/84fa2882-d800-4911-89c3-eb10b1cb3d02/retrieve","id":"-397256789"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"87c99933-908c-4123-bdd0-289e8cf72f5c","pagecount":"14","content":"This section provides:  Synthesis of progress and challenges in implementing the CRP, including their significance for the IDOs that characterize the CRP and a brief description of any noteworthy reorientation in the CRP. Synthesis of the two most significant achievements/success stories in the year (gender disaggregated where pertinent), with references to associated evidence and website links for more details. Overall financial summary: actual total spending (from all sources, including bilateral and Window 3) and percentage expended on gender research, compared to expected budget.CRPs produce two main categories of reports 1 :(i) Detailed documentation on progress at research theme/location/component and subcomponent level to CRP leadership. This information is the foundation that establishes the credibility of the reports in category (ii). It is prepared by CRP staff and submitted to the CRP leadership and is an important reference for (ii).(ii) Annual performance monitoring report at CRP level, from CRP Director and Lead Center to Consortium Office.The template provided in this document refers to the report in category (ii) whilst its supporting data refers to the information in category (i). Report (ii) is submitted by the CRP Director to the CSO by March 10, 2015 and covers progress during calendar year 2014. Its maximum expected length is 10 pages (plus annexes).The CRP report provides a strategic overview of where the program stands in terms of progress towards its targets. It focuses on outputs and outcomes and if relevant explains changes in future directions. It covers results achieved, regardless of sources of funds used to produce the results (i.e. windows 1, 2, 3 where relevant and bilateral). Different measures of progress have to be monitored over the life cycle of a CRP through different instruments. A given CRP is therefore expected to report every year on those items mentioned below that are relevant to its position in its own life cycle.Verification of the reliability of the information provided will occur through:-the external evaluation of the CRPs, commissioned by the Independent Evaluation Arrangement and the leadership of the CRPs; -the external evaluation of the performance monitoring and reporting system commissioned by the CO at regular intervals (2-3 years) -the peer review of the individual CRP reports will continue to take place, including by the CO -all supporting documents and data bases (report (i) mentioned above) will be available through web links.Describe partnership building achievements (if any new ones since last year) and associated strategic partnership issues, including public-private partnerships where relevant. Include a brief description of mechanisms designed to align CRP with priorities in national, regional bodies etc... Include a brief analysis of new strategic interactions with other CRPs and their effectiveness. Include a brief commentary on how different key partners are using the CRP's outputs and outcomes.Provide a summary and highlights of training and its outputs and outcomes. Use indicators from Table 1, as appropriate.List the three major risks that may hinder the expected delivery of results by the CRP and describe the mitigation actions taken to manage these risks.Analysis of variance from what was planned:i. Estimate the overall level of confidence/uncertainty of the indicators provided in Table 1.ii. Description, if relevant, of research avenues that did not produce expected results, and description of actions taken by the CRP, such as new research directions pursued and their expected outputs and outcomes.iii. Lessons learned by the CRP from its monitoring of the indicators and from its qualitative analyses of progress.There are 9 financial reports:1. Report L101 The templates for CRP financial reporting by CRP Directors and Lead Centers are attached as Appendix 3.Note that there is also a requirement for interim financial reports -the first four reports are also submitted to the Consortium at the half-year stage, and Report L401 is required quarterly.Explanatory notes on the financial reports:1 -Report L101 -Annual CRP Budget Summary -by CG Participant and Theme Annual report of income & expenditure compared to the approved Finplan, from all the various funding sources. The information is obtained by the Lead Center from the CG Participants, and the Lead Center consolidates the reports from the participating centers, so that the summary report is available at either Center-level or Theme-level.Report of income & expenditure to date on a cumulative base, from all the various funding sources, and compares that to the CRP total budget (also called \"Whole of Life\" budget) as per the PIA. The information is obtained by the Lead Center from the CG Participants, and the Lead Center consolidates the reports from the participating centers, so that the summary report is available at either Center-level or Theme-level.Provides a comparison of annual actual expenditure against the approved Finplan budget of the CRP, by natural classification, by CGIAR center. It ensures there is a realistic balance between the various components, and in particular provides information on funds flowing to partners outside the CGIAR. The report has data from each CG Center, and the information is for all the various funding sources. The information in this report is also reported in the annual financial statements of each center.Information on Bilateral Grants/Donors is needed so that their contributions to individual CRP's can be monitored. This will help with forecasting cash flow requirements. The report has data from each CG Center, and sets out expenditure to date on a cumulative base, from each individual donor. Amounts should be in accordance with L101 figures, for each center.This report provides an indicator on the extent of partner participation in the CRPs. It provides the name of the institute and country alongside the amount of expenditure.This report provides a summary of CRP cashflows, from the CO to Lead Centers and onto partners, during a financial year. This also reports intercenter receivables/payables at period end, and these balances need to be confirmed with relevant participating centers. This report is required to assist cash forecasting, and hence is requested quarterly.In addition to the \"themes\", there are two \"cross-cutting areas\" which should be reported separately:Area 1 -CRP Strategy, Management and Coordination Area 2 -Implementation of Gender Strategy Note that more cross-cutting areas may be recognized in the future, but for 2012 lead centers are requested to provide financial data only on two.The CRP Lead Centers are responsible for consolidation of each CRP financial report, and submission to the CO. The Participating Centers are responsible for submission of their CRP financial information to the Lead Centers, and ensuring that all inter-center amounts receivable/payable are in agreement with counterpart centers. Sex-disaggregated social data collected and used to diagnose important gender-related constraints in at least one of the CRP's main target populationsThe CRP has defined and collected baseline data on the main dimensions of gender inequality in the CRP's main target populations relevant to its expected outcomes (IDOs)And CRP targets changes in levels of gender inequality to which the CRP is or plans to contribute, with related numbers of men and women beneficiaries in main target populations 2. Institutional architecture for integration of gender is in place -CRP scientists and managers with responsibility for gender in the CRP's outputs are appointed, have written TORS.-Procedures defined to report use of available diagnostic or baseline knowledge on gender routinely for assessment of the gender equality implications of the CRP's flagship research products as per the Gender Strategy -CRP M&E system has protocol for tracking progress on integration of gender in research -CRP scientists and managers with responsibility for gender in the CRP's outputs are appointed, have written TORS and funds allocated to support their interaction.-Procedures defined to report use of available diagnostic or baseline knowledge on gender routinely for assessment of the gender equality implications of the CRP's flagship research products as per the Gender Strategy -CRP M&E system has protocol for tracking progress on integration of gender in research And A CRP plan approved for capacity development in gender analysis CRP scientists and managers with responsibility for gender in the CRP's outputs are appointed, have written TORS and funds allocated to support their interaction.-Procedures defined to report use of available diagnostic or baseline knowledge on gender routinely for assessment of the gender equality implications of the CRP's flagship research products as per the Gender Strategy -CRP M&E system has protocol for tracking progress on integration of gender in research And A CRP plan approved for capacity development in gender analysisThe CRP uses feedback provided by its M&E system to improve its integration of gender into research","tokenCount":"1390"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0145257737.json b/data/part_1/0145257737.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6db14837e22ff0ff836ff66a3bbe7e6c6b469798 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0145257737.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"ee12a342c19bf683522d62a27c47ab2a","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/2573f96a-296b-4df0-aab9-f41bb61b3f98/retrieve","id":"-1445215204"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"ae003a7e-3c29-4569-8b67-05e1cebb085e","pagecount":"23","content":"Las leguminosas forrajeras forman uno de los grupos de plantas más numerosos y esparcidos en el globo terrestre; se encuentran en regiones se climas variados y condiciones ecolóeícas diversas hasta 3,000 msnm.La técnica de propagación por estacas consiste en separar los tallos de la planta madre y colocarlos en condiciones ambientales favorables para inducirlos a formar rafees y nuevos tallos para producir una nueva planta.La cécnica de propagación por estacas requiere ciertos cuidados técnicos especialmente en el corte de las estacas ya que este hecho se considera como uno de los éxitos en la propagación.Otro hecho importante es conocer algunos aspectos básicos sobre las formas y las estructuras del crecimiento en las leguminosas las cuales se pueden aprovechar para obtener mayor cantidad de estacas por planta, teniendo en cuenta que las plantas originarias sean sanas y de estructura fuerte y madura.Los medios a utilizar para la propagación del material forrajero pueden ser diferentes tales como : arena tipo cuarzo, perlita (perlite), vermiculita (vermiculite), suelo, agua, los 2.cuales han dado muy buenos resultados en la propagación de leguminosas como Zornia. Stylosanthes. Desmodium. Centrosema.Estos medios a utilizar deben ser suf : ~ientemente firmes y densos para mantener las estacas en su sitio durante el enraizamiento; deben retener la suficiente humedad relativa en forma pareja y porosa de modo que el exceso de agua escurra y permita una aereación adecuada.Se debe tener en cuenta que estos medios estén libres de nemátodos. malezas y otros organismos patógenos nocivos que pueden afectar las estacas.A continuación se detallan algunos de los medios de propagación de las especies forrajeras:Generalmente se emplea arena de cuarzo que es e n forma predominante un complejo de silice. La arena más conveniente para el enraizamiento de leguminosas forrajeras es la que en albañileria se emplea para enlucidos. Se puede utilizar sola o mezclada con perlita pues ha demostrado que en ambos casos resulta muy satisfactorio su empleo.Es un material volcánico de color blanco que se extrae de los derrames de lava y después de ser tratado en hornos a grandes temperaturas se forma en granos pequeños, esponjosos y porosos que retienen agua en una proporción de 3 a 4 veces su peso. Esencialmente es neutro, con un pH de 7.0 a 7.5 pero sin capacidad de amortiguamiento; no contiene nutrientes y sostiene muy bien las estacas. Cuando se lava en una solución de agua y ácido sulfúrico se puede utilizar varias veces.Es de observar que la perlita se puede utilizar sola o mezclada en partes iguales con la vermiculita.Cuando se utiliza el suelo como medio de propagación es conveniente tener en cuenta: l. Seleccionar suelo que tenga una textura muy bien definida.Que esté l{bre de malezas, semillas y hongos nocivos para las estacas, muchas veces es conveniente esterilizar con vapor, bromuro de metilo, formol o en hornos a temperatura entre 50 y 60°C.4.Debe mezclarse el suelo con arena en relación a 2 partes de suelo por 1 de arena para garantizar mejores resultados de enraizamiento pues es conveniente el drenaje en este tipo de propagación.El agua es otro medio de gran importancia en la propagación Los sitios de propagación son fundamentales en la técnica de propagación por estacas, ya que la temperatura y la aireación del lugar debe tener temperaturas promedios de 20°C a 35°C. Los invernaderos son los sitios más favorables para las estacas por estar más protegidas de las inclemencias del tiempo.Son las bases o estructuras donde se colocarán los medios de propagación. Pueden ser: cámaras, recámaras, bandejas de plástico tipo Jiffy, bandejas de eternit, etc.En la Figura 2 se indica la cámara y la recámara como bases en una mesa de forma rectangular con una medida de aproximadamente 2.20 m de largo por 1.10 de ancho. En los cuatro lados u orillas de la mesa de encuentran las láminas de eternit de 20 cm de altura, que sirven de contención a los medios que se utilizarán tales como piedrita, arena, perlita o vermi.culita.Este tipo de instalación es ideal cuando se tienen sistemas de riego en forma de niebla pues se mantiene la temperatura adecuada.6. Recámara totalmente forrada en plástico cOn riego en forma de niebla.La Figura 3 muestra otra cámara de propagación que es muy práctica; tiene las mismas medidas que la de la Figura 2 pero no está cubierta en plástico. Tiene solamente 70 cm y se le pueden adaptar sistemas de riego en forma de lluvia, utilizando una manguera conectada a un tubo PVC de 1\" con boquillas especiales en este tipo de propagación (Yigura 4).A los dos tipos de cámara que hemos descrito anteriormente se les puede adaptar calor que consiste en conectar cables eléctricos mediante alambre de hierro galvanizado en la base de los medios.Este sistema se considera ideal para las épocas frias.f --------220 cm ---------1 Figura 3. cámara de propagación sencilla con riego en forma de lluvia fina. 2. Se llenan dos vasos de precipitación (beakers) con 500 cc de agua esterilizada o deionizada.3. Se prepara una solución (estimulante enraizador) y se vierte en un vaso de precipitación 100 cc en un gramo de ácido indolbutirico . (Figura 7). En el enraizamiento de leguminosas forrajeras es muy importante mantener una humedad adecuada para reducir al minimo la pérdida de agua por las hojas, una práctica común especialmente en épocas secas es asperjar las hojas con frecuencia aunque se emplee más tiempo. Se pueden hacer varias asper siones ligeras de agua durante el dia con intervalos largos cuando no se tienen equipos de riego automático.Aunque durante la formación de las rafces es importante la alta humedad en la estructura de propagación, también es necesario que se proporcione un drenaje adecuado de tal modo que escurra el exceso de agua y el medio de enraizamiento no quede húmedo en exceso.También es importante mantener buenas condiciones sanitarias en las cámaras, procurando también que las hojas que caen deben ser retiradas; igualmente debe hacerse con las estacas que estén muertas .Si en las estacas aparecen insectos tales como áfidos, arañita roja, chinches y otros, es necesario aplicar medidas de control por medio de insecticidas, acaricidas . y fungi~ cidas.Al retirar las estacas ya enraizadas debe tenerse mucho cuidado pues al hacerse en forma brusca se podría perder gran parte de las raíces que ya están formadas.20 .","tokenCount":"1040"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0149971387.json b/data/part_1/0149971387.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..edd8894f2597093be24b43a65ca7eaff921058e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0149971387.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"76f629f1f56f677aa22c51111df19dbc","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://repository.cimmyt.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/9bed1303-b31e-4f07-aeac-a692e63ae45a/content","id":"-1150685500"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"b6766269-85d4-4d44-a3ea-d22a28704c83","pagecount":"20","content":"kernel number and kernel weight were weak. Stg expression was largely dependent on rate of senescence which was related to the pattern of the greenness decay curve and the initial NDVI. QTL analyses revealed a total of 44 loci across environments linked to Stg and related traits, distributed across the genome, with the strongest and most repeatable effects detected on chromosomes 1B, 2A, 2B, 4A, 4B and 7D. Of these, some were common with regions controlling phenology but independent regions were also identified. The co-location of QTL for Stg and performance traits in this study confirms that the staygreen phenotype is a useful trait for productivity enhancement in hot-irrigated environments.The staygreen attribute, defined as \"heritable delayed foliar senescence\" (Thomas and Stoddart 1975) is considered as a selection criterion for crop improvement to extend grainfilling duration and ensure that grain size is not limited by lack of post-anthess assimilates. For many years the staygreen character has been empirically included in visual selection of breeding lines (Thomas and Ougham 2014) but its genetic basis is not well understood.The visible symptom of a staygreen phenotype is the persistence of greenness, which actually represents only one of many processes involved in delayed leaf senescence. The permanence of the pigment can be due to disabled chlorophyll catabolism or modification of the chlorophyll b and chlorophyll a ratio (Thomas and Howarth 2000). Complex hormonal controls are involved in leaf senescence, where cytokinins are the main inhibitors; plant treatment with cytokinins has resulted in staygreen phenotypes of tobacco and Arabidopsis (Gan and Amasino 1995). Five types of staygreen have been distinguished (Thomas and Howarth 2000), which broadly can be grouped as cosmetic staygreen or functional staygreen. As their names indicate, in the first type of staygreen the tissue looks green even when photosynthetic activity has been decreased or stopped in contrast to the functional staygreen (Thomas and Ougham 2014). The latter is obviously the target of plant breeding. Staygreen has been associated with drought and heat tolerance (Kumari et al. 2007); for example in sorghum, grain yield is positively associated with staygreen under water limited conditions (Rosenow et al. 1983;Borrell and Douglas 1996). Similarly to drought environments, under heat stressed conditions the staygreen attribute seems to be advantageous. Genotypes that exhibit delayed loss of greenness after anthesis show superior agronomic performance (Kumari et al. 2007;Borrell and Douglas 1996;Borrell et al. 2000). The latter is because staygreen indicates higher photosynthetic assimilation in the late stages of plant development which contributes to increase crop yield; the reason can be an extended photosynthetic active phase or higher photosynthetic rate due greater retention of leaf nitrogen content (Harris et al. 2007). However, it is not yet clear if the physiological and genetic basis for delayed loss of greenness under heat are similar to drought. Mechanisms related to the staygreen phenotype conferring heat adaption may be for example, the conservation of nitrogen through reduction of plant size (including leaves, stems and roots) and modification of water uptake patterns as found under water limited conditions (Borrell et al. 2014a;Mace et al. 2012), but this needs to be confirmed. Sorghum plant with reduced leaf size and decreased tillering have proven to result in genotypes using a conservative strategy to reduce the use of soil water before anthesis for use during grainfilling when water is a limitation. Apparently the staygreen genes affect the expression of genes controlling hormones influencing plant growth (Borrell et al. 2014a). Neverthless, sorghum has shown correlations between staygreen and yield in environments yielding >6 t ha −1 (Jordan et al. 2012).Genetic variability for staygreen has been identified and exploited in maize, oat, rice, wheat, fescue, soybean, pea, tomato, pepper, fruits, trees and other species (Barry et al. 2008;Armstead et al. 2006;Duvick et al. 2004;Thomas and Smart 1993;Thomas and Stoddart 1975). A number of studies have modelled the staygreen attribute as an indicator of photosynthetic activity. Deeper understanding of the dynamics and mechanisms affecting staygreen under high temperature environments are required to successfully exploit this attribute and improve plant adaptation to heat stress. Modelling canopy greenness dynamics over the whole crop cycle can help with this, while having obvious application in determining the best time for screening by identifying at what growth stage(s) differences in greenness are best associated with yield and show the best resolution. The factors affecting staygreen under high temperature conditions are unclear but a better understanding of canopy greenness dynamics are expected to (a) provide information about canopy activity at different time-points during the crop cycle which may be under independent genetic control, and (b) demonstrate when differences in greenness are best expressed in order to refine screening protocols.Elevated temperatures and high irradiance promote the generation of reactive oxygen (ROS) species which can lead to cell damage and further accelerate loss of green biomass (McDonald and Vanlerberghe 2004;Christiansen 1978). In this regard, it seems that the staygreen genotypes have the ability to cope with the negative effect of heat stress either by minimizing the production and accumulation of ROS through the pigments such as xanthophylls and carotenes that protect the chloroplasts by dissipating excess of radiation energy, reducing damage to the photosynthetic apparatus (Hopkins and Hüner 2009;Suzuki and Mittler 2006;Zhao and Tan 2005). It is interesting that staygreen is frequently reported for leaf greenness while other organs that also contribute to total plant photosynthesis such stems and spikes are not always considered. CO 2 absorbed by spikes represents at least 20 % of flag leaf CO 2 captured in wheat (Teare et al. 1972) and estimates indicate that the spikes' contribution to grain yield is variable depending of the conditions but can reach up to the 70 % in wheat and barley grown under stress (Maydup et al. 2010;Araus et al. 1993;Biscoe et al. 1973;Thorne 1963). Accurate quantification of individual leaf greenness (Harris et al. 2007) can be performed with the SPAD meter, and visual scoring, though more subjective, has been used to estimate greenness for decades (Kumar et al. 2010). The GreenSeeker spectral sensor offers an integrative high throughput approach to precision quantification of staygreen; it measures total canopy variation in green area including leaves, stems and spikes and permits screening of a large number of samples in a relatively short time (Lopes and Reynolds 2012); this enables potential application in large scale phenotyping including for QTL mapping. The current study applies this novel methodology measuring normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) during the crop cycle so that the pattern of greenness decline could be determined. A number of NDVI-based staygreen related traits can be derived to enhance understanding of the mechanisms affecting plant's greenness persistence; these include the proportion of plant greenness lost mid grainfilling (Gdecay); the estimation of the velocity of greenness loss (RS) which together with the type of NDVI curve can provide information about how fast are lost the plant greenness and photosynthetic activity; and the estimate of total green biomass (StgAUC and TotalAUC), parameters determining light interception. It is hypothesized that StgAUC and TotalAUC can reflect the accumulated plant greenness during a given period of time and that high values for these two traits are favorable for plant performance due to an increase in plant's green area available for capturing radiation (Cossani and Reynolds 2012). The quantification of the staygreen attribute and other related traits in a wheat mapping population allows the identification of genetic loci controlling staygreen which can provide the tools to enable MAS to accelerate and improve efficiency of plant breeding. QTL mapping for staygreen has been performed for several species including Lolium (Thorogood et al. 1999), pearl millet (Howarth et al. 1994), wheat (Kumar et al. 2010;Vijayalakshmi et al. 2010), maize (Zheng et al. 2009) and sorghum (Harris et al. 2007;Tao et al. 2000).It has been estimated that wheat yield is reduced 3-5 % per 1 °C increased above 15 °C during the grainfilling period (Gibson and Paulsen 1999). High temperatures result in accelerated plant growth, reduced plant size and shortened cycle, limiting the amount of light intercepted. In that sense, extending the grainfilling duration through delayed greenness loss seems to be especially advantageous in heat stressed environment. The exact profile of the staygreen attribute as a heat adaptive-trait still needs to be clarified but in the current study it is proposed that plant greenness during grainfilling is lost following different patterns and that these patterns can be modelled following linear and non-linear regression models. Finally it is anticipated that genotypic differences for the Stg trait and related parameters exist and that this trait can be mapped for QTL to provide new avenues in the understanding of mechanisms controlling plant staygreen and its association with yield and other physiological traits.The specific objectives of this study were (1) to model plant senescence patterns of Seri/Babax RIL grown under heat-stressed, irrigated conditions, (2) to calculate a measure of staygreen (Stg) at physiological maturity using a linear regression model, and (3) to identify QTL linked to this character and additional traits associated with heat tolerance.The population consisted of 167 RIL derived from crosses between two of CIMMYT's elite lines: Seri M82 (herein called Seri) derived from a 'Veery' cross (KVZ/BUHO// KAL/BB) and a sister line of the elite variety Baviacora M92 'Babax' (BOW/NAC//VEE/3/BJY/COC). Both parents exhibit drought tolerance and high yield potential (Olivares-Villegas et al. 2007) while the population is characterized by a restricted range of height and phenology and does not segregate for major height, vernalization or photoperiod response genes (Pinto et al. 2010).Five heat-stressed, irrigated trials were conducted during the seasons 2005, 2006, 2010, 2011 and 2013 in the Yaqui Valley, Northwest México; the site is a high radiation, irrigated environment. In 2005In , 2006 and 2010 the trials were sown in February and in 2011 and 2013 the trials were sown in March. Based on the mean temperature at particular developmental stages, the trials were classified as: moderately hot (M), hot (H) or intensely hot (I) and are named with these letters followed by the last two digits of the sowing and harvest year (Table 1). Field experiments consisted of plots of one raised bed of 80 × 100 cm with two rows per bed; all the experiments were sown in two-replicate alpha-lattice designs. Sowing seed density was 15 gm −2 in the February and March trials. All trials were fully irrigated when ~50 % of available soil moisture was depleted in the 0-1 m soil profile.Physiological and agronomical traits were recorded in the five trials according to standard procedures detailed elsewhere (Reynolds et al. 2001). These included: repeated measurements during the vegetative (v) and grainfilling stages (g) for the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), flag leaf chlorophyll (Chl) and canopy temperature (CT); individual measurements were averaged for these traits and a single value is presented. Also recorded were the number of days to reach heading (heading) and physiological maturity (maturity), plant height (height), grain yield, kernel number (KN), grain weight (TGW) and the grainfilling rate [GFR = yield/(days to maturity − days to heading)]. NDVI was measured by canopy reflectance with a GreenSeeker (Optical Sensor Unit, 2002 NTech Industries, Inc., Ukiah, CA, USA). The chlorophyll of the flag leaf was assessed using a portable chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502 Minolta, Spectrum Technologies Inc., Plainfield, IL, USA) and the CT was recorded using an infrared thermometer (Mikron M90 series) 2-3 times per week avoiding cloudy and windy days according to the protocol described in Reynolds et al. (2001).Staygreen (Stg) was calculated using linear regression analyses of NDVI readings from heading until shortly after maturity according to Lopes and Reynolds (2012), given that anthesis under heat stress occurs very shortly after heading. The regression equation for each experimental plot was obtained by plotting NDVI during grain filling (NDVIg) against days after heading; Stg was calculated by substituting the maturity day in the equation. Stg is a unitless trait given that it is based on a NDVI ratio. The rate of senescence (RS) for each genotype was calculated from the slope of the NDVIg decline against thermal time (°C) using a linear regression equation (Fig. 1). Greenness decay (Gdecay) was calculated as the percentage of NDVI decline in the first half of the grainfilling stage (in number of days after heading). Staygreen-area (StgAUC) and Total area (TotalAUC) were calculated as the area under the curve with starting points at maximum NDVI (for StgAUC) or at crop establishment (TotalAUC) and using the corresponding thermal time for each case. Stg and staygreen related traits (RS, Gdecay, StgAUC, TotalAUC) were estimated only in three environments: M10, H05 and I13, due to insufficient NDVI data in H11 and I06.The modelling of NDVI curves across the crop development period and during staygreen decay in the grainfilling phase were performed in R 3.1.0 (http://www.R-project. org/) applying a sigmoidal function. In the M10 environment NDVIv (NDVI during the vegetative stage) was not recorded before 500 degree-days (dd, °C d) but in order to draw an NDVI trend for the whole cycle, this gap was filled using NDVI from H05 trial, given that comparable values were expected because NDVI for both trials performed similarly after 500 dd. (dotted line, Fig. 4). This assumption had no effect on the calculated Stg values orStg related traits, except on TotalAUC, since only the later included these inferred NDVI values. For this analysis, a non-linear model was developed by combining two sigmoidal functions as given by the following equation:where TT is the thermal time (i.e. °C days), is the simulated NDVI at TT, NDVI max is the season maximum NDVI parameter, r exp is a canopy expansion rate parameter, i exp is a canopy expansion inflection point parameter, r sen is a canopy senescence rate parameter, and i sen is the inflection point of canopy senescence. Each genotype was individually modelled for NDVIg after heading following linear and non-linear models using the equations: Linear model:Non-linear models:The best fitted model was selected based in the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).Adjusted means were obtained in SAS v9.0 using ANOVA mixed models to obtain the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUPs); spatial adjustment was included in the analysis by adding the effect of row and column according to the location of each plot in the field. Pearson's phenotypic correlations (r P ) were calculated using the formula of Roff (1995) from the adjusted means. The QTL mapping analyses were performed in GenStat 15th edition in a Composite Interval mapping procedure using a threshold LOD value of 2 to identify all QTL candidates and LOD > 3.5 for defining consistent QTL. QTL mapping was performed individually by trial and by trait, and also for each trait combined across environments.The Seri/Babax population map used here in was previously constructed and consisted of 475 markers: 118 SSR (Single Sequence Repeat), 212 AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism), and 145 DArT (Diversity Array Technology) markers distributed over 20 chromosomes, only the chromosome 3D is missing (McIntyre et al. 2010). Previous QTL mapping studies have been reported using earlier versions of this map (Pinto et al. 2010;Lopes and Reynolds 2012). (TT−i sen) ,NDVI TT = aTT 2 + bTT + cCurve type 3. normalized difference vegetative index during grainfilling i thermal time with maximum NDVIg, j thermal time with minimum recorded NDVIg; RS was calculated as the linear slope from i to j for all the genotypes, Stg staygreen, residual greenness remaining at physiological maturity calculated using a linear regression for each genotypesThe adjusted means and basic statistics for all traits calculated across the four trials for parents and RILs are presented on Table 2. The two parents showed similar expression for Stg, phenology and other traits while a much wider range was observed in the RIL. The rate of senescence (RS) for both parents averaged across environments indicated that the NDVIg decreased by about 8 SPADunits each degree day (°C), similarly to the estimated population mean. Gdecay across environments ranged from 18 to 44 % and averaged 31.2 % for the RILs. Heading time was found to be relatively constant across parents and RILs, with a range of 13 days observed across environments. Pearson's correlations showed that trial associations were positive and significant for yield (Fig. 2). Staygreen (Stg) was found to not well associated (p > 0.05) across the three environments (Fig. 3) varying from 0.12 to 0.38 but Stg showed consistent and positive correlation with kernel number (KN), thousand grain weight (TGW) and yield (Supplementary Fig. 1). The correlation between Stg and TGW was the weakest on average (Table 3), although it was still significant (p < 0.05). The distribution of the Stg trait showed that it varied across environments, ranging from 0.2 to 0.4, 0.05 to 0.3 and 0.14 to 0.27 for the M10, H05 and I13 trials, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2). The highest values were observed in M10 which experienced lower heat stress compared with H05 and I13. Unexpectedly, the lowest Stg values were found in H05 and not in I13, but the variability for this trait was reduced under intense heat stress in I13. The rate of senescence for the parents by environment is presented in Supplementary Fig. 3.Individual measurements of NDVIv and NDVIg were plotted against thermal time and by regression analyses a single curve was fitted for the whole population for each environment. The performance of the NDVI trait across the cycle showed similar patterns in H05 and M10; major differences were observed in the NDVI pattern of the highest stressed environment, I13 (Fig. 4). Maximum NDVI was about 0.80 in M10 and 0.75 in H05, contrasting with I13 where the maximum NDVI was only 0.6. These maximum values were reached at about 750 degree-days in all environments. 1 3During grain filling, Seri showed lower initial NDVIg values than Babax at the same thermal time in the three environments (Supplementary Fig. 4). However, the decline in greenness in Seri was slower than the decline in Babax resulting in only marginally lower Stg for Seri. When modelling each mapping line separately, the 169 genotypes were observed to fit one of three types of curves best (Fig. 5). In the I13 environment, higher variation for type of curve was observed, given that the proportion of genotypes that fitted better to a linear curve (55 %) was close to the proportion of genotypes that fitted better to a parabolic curve (45 %). But when the heat stress was lower the diversity was reduced. In H05, 96 % of the population fitted a parabola best (curve type 2 and 3) and only 4 % fitted a linear model (curve type 1); while in M10 all the genotypes fitted a parabolic (curve type 2) curve best (data not shown). To investigate relation between trait performance and NDVIg curve types, a subset of 53 genotypes with restricted range of phenology (average difference in heading date between groups was restricted to 1 day) was selected from the I13 environment in order to balance the number of genotypes included on each group. This environment was chosen because it exhibited a larger diversity for type of curve compared to M10 and H05. In an ANOVA, curve type was significantly related to yield (Table 4). Significant differences were found between genotype groups with different curve types, for yield, yield components and physiological traits (Table 4). The curve type with largest StgAUC, curve type 2, was associated with higher yield, KN, TGW, NDVIg, GFR and GFD. Significant differences were also detected for phenology and plant height, even though differences in heading time between groups were restricted.The QTL mapping analysis was performed for 19 traits by single and by combined environments resulting in a total of 98 analyses (Trait × Environment combinations). A total of 193 QTL were identified with LOD > 2. Of these, 44 QTL were linked to Stg and staygreen associated traits, 37 QTL were associated with yield and yield components and the rest were related to other physiological parameters and phenology. Average LOD scores for all QTL associated with Stg and related traits, yield and yield components and with physiological traits were 3.5, 4.1 and 4.0, respectively. Across all QTL, for all traits and environments, the highest LOD score and the maximum phenotypic variance explained was 18.4 and 36.4 %, respectively, which was for a QTL on 1B for NDVIv. Additionally, 13 linkage groups contained two QTL located >30 cM apart for the same trait. A summary of results is presented as a matrix in Table 5. More detail about QTL with LOD > 3.5 is presented on Table 6; this table shows the related marker(s), maximum variances, size of effects as well as the increasing allele for each QTL. Except for H05, the maximum variances explained in all environments were found for QTL related to traits other than yield.QTL for Stg were located on chromosomes 2A, 4B, 4D, 6A and 7D. The largest phenotypic variance (15 %) was for a locus on 7D. This was also the most repeatable Stg QTL detected (two of three environments plus the combined analysis). Stg related traits such as RS, StgAUC, TotalAUC and Gdecay gave 9, 8, 11 and 11 QTL, respectively. The 4B and 7D loci seemed to be the main genomic regions controlling Stg related traits, given that those QTL were identified for multiple environments and traits (Table 5). A QTL on 1B explained around 10 % of the phenotypic variance for both RS and Gdecay. On 2B a QTL was detected for RS, TotalAUC, StgAUC and also for Gdecay where the greatest variance explained was about 10 % (for Gdecay). Most of the QTL for StgAUC and TotalAUC had LOD values greater than 3.5. QTL on 5B explained 11.3 % of the variance for TotalAUC and 7.3 % of variance for StgAUC (Table 6). For StgAUC the maximum phenotypic variance, 10.5 %, was explained by a QTL on 2A (Table 5). Considering all the environments, alleles from both parents contributed equally to Stg across the genome (Table 6).A number of QTL associated with agronomic and physiological traits were found co-located (linked to markers <30 cM) with QTL for Stg and staygreen related traits (Table 5). Figure 6 shows a Venn diagram summarizing these genetic overlaps. The 1B, 3B, 4A, 4B and 6B genomic regions appeared to be the most important ones controlling yield and yield components based on repeatability and significance (Table 5). Yield QTL co-located with QTL for Stg and staygreen related traits on 1B, 2A, 2B, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5A, 5B, 6B and 7A, and the QTL on 1B, explained the greatest variances for yield (linked to markers at 61.71-65.36 cM), KN (60.73-66.35 cM) and GFR (61.81-66.35 cM) (Table 6). This yield QTL on 1B appeared in three of five environments plus in the combined analysis, and was also found at or near QTL for RS, TotalAUC and Gdecay. The strongest effects for yield (16.5 g/m 2 ) were found on 1B and 4A. For TGW, a QTL on 1A explained close to 12 % of variance and had an additive effect of almost 1 g in the M10 and I06 environments. QTL for StgAUC and TotalAUC were also found on chromosome 1A but >30 cM distant from the QTL for TGW. In total, 28 QTL were identified for NDVI, 12 for NDVIv and 16 for NDVIg; most of these QTL showed LOD > 3.5. On 1B, a major QTL for early ground cover, defined by NDVIv, was found in the same region as QTL for RS, TotalAUC and Gdecay; for all the traits the QTL were linked to markers found between 59.7 and 64.2 cM (Table 6), indicating co-location. This NDVIv QTL on 1B explained more than 36 % of phenotypic variance for the trait. On the other hand the maximum variance for NDVIg (12 %) was explained by a QTL on 7D (linked to one marker on 2.73 cM) which co-located with QTL for Stg, RS and Gdecay (linked to markers at 2.73-11.1 cM).On chromosomes 1B, 2B and 3B, there was co-location of chlorophyll content QTL (LOD > 3.5), defined by Chlv and Chlg, with Stg QTL related traits; in these three regions the Sgt and Chl QTL were associated with closely linked markers (at ~60, 40 and 113 cM for 1B, 2B and 3B, respectively). Almost 12 % of variance for Chlv was explained by a QTL on 6A, while a QTL on 3B explained about 14 % of the variance for Chlg. Eight QTL were detected for CTv and eight for CTg. Average LOD scores for all QTL related to canopy temperature was 4.2. For CTg the maximum variance was 15 %, explained by a QTL on 7D (at 2.73 cM), which was co-located with a number of QTL for Stg and related traits (at 2.73-11.1 cM). Additionally, the 4A region showed two regions affecting both CTg and yield, the first being located close to 13 cM and the other at around the 111 cM. The maximum variance explained for CTv was for loci on 1B and 4A, each explaining 17 % of the variance. Opposite to the 1B QTL, the QTL on 4A was repeatedly detected for CTv and CTg and in all environments, excepted in H11. The two CTv QTL on 1B and 4A co-located with QTL for yield showing the strongest effects for the trait, but did not co-locate with Stg QTL. The QTL detected for CTv at ~61 cM on 1B also controlled RS. The QTL for CTv and CTg on chromosome 4A co-located with QTL for RS, StgAUC and Tota-lAUC; only the QTL for RS seems to be different, given the large distances between QTL; The CTv and CTg QTL were found at 13-15 cM while the QTL for RS was located at 72 cM. QTL for Gdecay coincided with QTL for CTv and CTg on 1B, 2B, 3B, 4A and 7D, and in all cases the linked markers were closely located, indicating that it was the same QTL. Plant height was mainly controlled by loci on 3A, 4B and 5B. The strongest QTL for plant height was found on 3A, explained about 8 % of phenotypic variance for the trait and had an additive effect of 1.3 cm. This QTL on 3A was not co-located with any QTL for Stg or related traits of LOD > 3.5, or for yield or yield components. However the height QTL on 4B and 5B co-located with QTL for Stg, TotalAUC, StgAUC, Gdecay, yield, TGW and KN.Plant phenology QTL (date of heading and maturity) were positioned across the Seri/Babax genome but with small individual effects (<1.5 days, see Table 6). A QTL on 7D explained the highest variances for both heading and maturity. Based on repeatability and significance it seems that plant phenology was mainly controlled by the 2B, 5D and 7D genomic regions. The consistent QTL (LOD > 3.5) on 2B, 4A and 7D co-located with consistent QTL for Stg and all related traits. QTL for all these traits were found linked to markers at 26.8-40.9 cM on 2B, at 12.92-23.65 cM on 4A and on 2.73-11.7 cM on 7D. The phenology QTL on 5D did not co-locate with any QTL for Stg or related traits. Considering all the environments, alleles from both parents contributed equally to Stg across the genome (Table 6). QTL for Stg, StgAUC and TotalAUC mostly had Babax contributing the increasing allele i.e., these alleles favoured higher areas under the NDVI curve during the whole crop cycle (TotalAUC) and also during the greenness decay phase (StgAUC). Regarding yield, TGW and KN these traits were increased by alleles from both parents across the genome; however, Babax alleles tended to contribute the highest positive effects at loci explaining the maximum variances. Similarly, both parents contributed to increases in NDVI during both the vegetative and the grainfilling stages, depending on the locus. On the other hand, increases in canopy temperature were largely contributed by Seri alleles.Understanding the staygreen mechanism in the Seri/ Babax population-association with yield and plant performanceThe staygreen phenotype has been associated with improved performance of several species under heat stress (Reynolds et al. 2000;Kumari et al. 2013) and in the current study there was a positive and significant association of Stg with yield and yield components (Table 3). However in order to properly exploit the potential of the staygreen trait, a clearer understanding of the underlying mechanisms for the staygreen phenotype in the context of the cumulative effect of traits contributing to yield maintenance in stressed environments is needed. The current study found Stg to be positively associated with high yield, TGW, GFD, KN, and low CT. While heat stress conditions can reduce the grain number due to seed abortion or reduced grain set (Hays et al. 2007;Tashiro and Wardlaw 1990) crop productivity is also related to longer grainfilling periods and faster grainfilling rates, so it is expected that under heat stress, staygreen traits and green tissue area contribute to heavier grains (Kumari et al. 2013). Canopy temperature depression has also been found to be positively and strongly correlated with staygreen traits suggesting a possible link with root development patterns in bread wheat (Christopher et al. 2008;Kumari et al. 2013), as found in sorghum staygreen genotypes (Borrell et al. 2014a). Herein, the canopy temperature during the vegetative stage (CTv) was also found to be associated with RS and with NDVIv (Supplementary Table 1) further supporting the hypothesis that the RS staygreen attribute in wheat is primarily a consequence of the initial amount of greenness (total biomass 1A For each QTL all linked markers with LOD > 3.5 are listed. Only the environment where the maximum variance explained was detected for a given QTL is indicated together with its corresponding effect and allele contributing to increase the trait. For QTL with more than one listed marker the first is the marker related to the maximum R 2 Chromosomes with two QTL for the same trait since distances between associated markers was >30 cM and chlorophyll) potentially available for filling the grains. This was supported by the fact that genotypes with cooler CTv tended to have higher initial greenness and biomass (NDVIv) and faster rates of senescence during grain filling. NDVI is an integrative measure of chlorophyll and total plant biomass, confirmed by a significant positive correlation between NDVIg and Chlg and height (Supplementary Table 1). The absolute rate of senescence (RS) was positively correlated with yield in the Seri/Babax population (Table 3), showing that genotypes with higher yields tended to lose chlorophyll faster. Higher absolute RS was also observed in genotypes with higher NDVIv, StgAUC and TotalAUC (Supplementary Table 1) showing that despite higher rates of NDVI decay during grain filling in these genotypes, the total amount of initial NDVIg was higher allowing for higher amounts of photosynthesis per unit degree day to fill grains. Interestingly, higher RS did not result in a faster arrival to maturity (associations of RS with days to maturity were not significant). This suggests that among the Seri/Babax progeny, genotypes with a staygreen phenotype were characterized by a high initial greenness, high StgAUC and TotalAUC and high RS, while attaining maturity within a similar timeframe, compared to non staygreen genotypes. In most species studied so far, a very conservative response has been observed for the staygreen phenotype with low RS and delayed onset of senescence (Thomas and Ougham 2014). However, the wheat Seri/Babax population grown in warm and irrigated environments showed a pattern of staygreen where higher initial greenness is lost at a higher rate without really accelerating time to maturity (Supplementary Table 1, NDVIv and Maturity, r P = 0.13, p = 0.089). Nonetheless, analysis across all environments showed low heritability for Stg especially for RS, similarly to results reported by Lopes and Reynolds (2012) in one staygreen study performed in the same population. Moderate and high heritability was found for physiological and agronomic traits (Table 2).Interpretation of staygreen would be most straightforward when dynamic traits fit a linear model. However during the grainfilling phase plant greenness decay patterns sometimes fitted non-linear models best. Non-linear regression curves have been previously used to describe the percent of greenness retained during grainfilling (Vijayalakshmi et al. 2010). Additionally, a number of genotypes from the Seri/Babax population were found to fit best a parabolic model in the M10, H05 and I13 environments. Parabolic curves were observed in two of the 3 years in which the Stg attribute was analyzed. Interestingly, the tendency to follow a particular pattern was related to heat stress intensity. Furthermore, the same genotype could fit different curves, depending of the environment, suggesting high G × E for staygreen traits, as reported in previous studies (Bogard et al. 2011;Kumar et al. 2010). According to our modelling results the best time to screen staygreen parameters under heat-stressed, irrigated environments is around mid grainfilling (1200-1550 dae), given that in this period was observed highest resolution in the greenness canopy dynamics between genotypes (Fig. 4, 5). The latter was supported by co-location of QTL for yield and performance traits with QTL for Gdecay; this parameter estimates the percentage of greenness lost (from the maximum) at mid grainfilling and Table 5 showed that the main region controlling Gdecay, RS, yield, KN and GFR was 1B; several additional regions of minor effect were also found in common between these traits. Notwithstanding, for a completer understanding of the canopy dynamics it is suggested to start NDVI recordings when the maximum is reached (in these study it was around the about 750 degree-days) and extend the measurements after physiological maturity. The largest genetic diversity for type of curve was observed in the I13 environment which experienced the highest temperatures; in this environment linear and non-linear models applied to an almost equal proportion of genotypes. Lower diversity for the type of curve was observed in the H05 environment in which heat stress was moderate and in which only 4 % of the population fitted a linear model (curve type 1). In M10, which was the least heat stressed environment, the whole population fitted a non-linear model best (data not shown).A curve type 2 (see Fig. 5) during the decay phase resulted in larger area under the greenness curve (StgAUC) which would have allowed more photosynthesis, thus explaining the association of this curve type with higher grain yields (Table 4) (Kumari et al. 2013). By contrast, the lower StgAUC observed for curve type 3 resulted in lower photosynthetic area and genotypes with reduced grain number (KN) (Table 4). The classification of staygreen into four functional types is highly descriptive but in reality it is quite hard to classify a genotype into one or another group because the staygreen phenotype often results from a combination of two or more types (Thomas and Howarth 2000). Additionally, it is important to take into account that the Stg and RS traits by themselves cannot completely describe the staygreen attribute given the high relevance of the initial greenness value, as observed in the current study.Heat tolerance is a complex trait influenced by different component traits. Increasing temperatures accelerate plant development and decrease the length and amount of green biomass (through decreased organ size and plant height).The main chromosome regions controlling staygreen related traits in this wheat population were generally colocated with regions controlling agronomic and physiological attributes. Different staygreen traits were calculated and QTL mapped, including the residual greenness at maturity (Stg), the rate of senescence (RS), the green area under the curve (StgAUC) and the percentage of greenness lost at mid grainfilling (Gdecay)-all estimated from NDVI decay curves. The maximum phenotypic variance for any staygreen related QTL was detected on chromosome 7D associated with Stg; this locus has been previously described as associated with permanence of greenness under high temperatures (Vijayalakshmi et al. 2010;Kumar et al. 2010).In the current study, this Stg QTL on 7D co-located with a QTL for NDVIg, CTg (Table 5) and days to heading. Kumari et al. (2013) reported that staygreen in bread wheat was associated with high canopy temperature depression (CTD) such that the warmer plants tended to be non staygreen. There is evidence in sorghum that staygreen genes overlap with root architecture genes (Mace et al. 2012), for example, QTL for root nodal angle have been found to be co-located with Stg QTL including the Stg4 QTL associated with biomass partitioning between root and shoot (Borrell et al. 2014b). In the present study, the 7D region also controlled Gdecay and StgAUC as well as CTg, with the Seri allele being positive. Gdecay and CTg were positively correlated in the Seri/Babax population indicating that cooler genotypes tended to lose a smaller percentage of greenness in the first half of the grainfilling period. Gdecay and CTg controlled by the QTL on 7D seemed to be affected by plant phenology (Lopes et al. 2013) given the co-location of a main QTL for heading and maturity here (Table 5), but there was no effect of phenology in the 4A region where a consistent QTL was identified for Gdecay and CTg. The highest phenotypic variability explained for Gdecay (11.1 %) and RS (10.6 %) was detected on the 1B chromosome. Chromosome 1B has been reported to control a number of performance traits. Yang et al. (2002) found a QTL for grain filling duration on the short arm of chromosomes 1B which co-located with a number of QTL for Stg related traits from this study. Moreover, this QTL on chromosome 1B was co-located with yield, Chlg, NDVIv, CTv, Gdecay and KN. The 1B region also has been associated with SPAD chlorophyll content (Talukder et al. 2014) and Pinto et al. (2010) reported several QTL on 1B for canopy temperature, yield, and chlorophyll content at the grain filling stage in the Seri/Babax population. Common QTL for Stg related traits, yield, yield components and physiological characters indicate a common genetic basis for these attributes. The strongest QTL for yield detected in the current study was found on chromosome 1B and interestingly, it co-located with a QTL for green leaf duration detected in a previous study of spring wheat grown under heat stress in greenhouse experiments (Naruoka et al. 2012). The calculation and mapping of diverse staygreen associated parameters across the crop cycle allowed to determine if these parameters are under independent genetic controls in the Seri/Babax population. Our study showed that the strongest regions controlling StAUC and TotalAUC are different from those with largest effects for Stg, Gdecay and RS which suggest independent genetic controls for these traits. However, co-location of QTL for these parameters were also identified across the wheat genome which indicate minor overlapping of genes. In conjunction it seems that the mapping of diverse parameters associated to the staygreen attribute contribute with additional and valuable information that could be lost if the investigation is limited to the staygreen (Stg) study per se. For example, the 1B region was found to contain main genetic controls for yield and other agronomic traits and QTL for RS, TotalAUC and StgAUC were identified on 1B but not for Stg (Table 5).In agreement with our results (Table 5), Naruoka et al. (2012) found that the 4A and 3B chromosomes controlled green leaf duration in spring wheat grown under heat and also drought stress; in the Seri/Babax population the 4A and 3B chromosomes seemed to contain genes driving StgAUC, RS and Gdecay. These two genomic regions also showed QTL for yield, yield components, NDVI, GFR, chlorophyll content and canopy temperature which coincided with results from Pinto et al. (2010). During leaf senescence the mechanisms that protect the chlorophyll molecule from photodamage fail and result in leaf yellowing (Thomas and Howarth 2000). In some species, the staygreen phenotype can be conferred by genetic deletions of the locus encoding phaeophorbide a oxygenase (PaO), the main regulatory enzyme for chlorophyll catabolism (Vicentini et al. 1995;Roca et al. 2004;Thomas and Howarth 2000). However, the genetic basis of the staygreen phenotype is complex and differs from one species to another. Multiple staygreen genes (SGR) have been identified in several species, but the number of staygreen genes varies between species and homologos genes do not always result in increased greenness persistence. This may be because staygreen genes may also have different functions from one species to another; an example of this is in Arabidopsis where over-expression of the SGR2 gene results in a staygreen phenotype whereas over-expression of the SGR1 gene promotes leaf yellowing (Sakuraba et al. 2015). The physiological and biochemical mechanisms by which the staygreen genes affect chlorophyll degradation are unclear but various studies seem to indicate the involvement of a multi-protein complex containing chlorophyll catabolic enzymes (CCEs), the product of the staygreen gene 1 (SGR1) and light-harvesting complex subunits of photosystem II (LHCII). Apparently, this complex channels phototoxic Chl intermediates during chlorophyll catabolism (Sakuraba et al. 2012).Studies have shown that the staygreen phenotype includes a genetic component affected by the phenological clock of the plant and a second component un-related to plant developmental stage. In the current study consistent QTL for staygreen related traits on 2A, 2D, 5B, 6B and 7A were not co-located with phenology QTL; while consistent QTL for staygreen related traits and consistent QTL for heading and maturity co-located on 2B, 4A, 4D and 7D. In general terms, earliness in the Seri/Babax population was associated with longer GFD. Overlapping genomic regions for plant phenology and staygreen attributes suggest common genes controlling these traits. In Festuca pratensis, staygreen independent from phenology has been reported as a recessive character generated by changes in a gene regulating the pathway of chlorophyll degradation (Vicentini et al. 1995); Lolium and Festuca staygreen mutants show expression of the PaO enzyme but with reduced activity (Vicentini et al. 1995;Roca et al. 2004). However, the underlying mechanism associated with the staygreen character seems to vary (Thomas and Howarth 2000). In soybean for example, staygreen can be the result of a cytoplasmic mutation, CytG, which makes the chlorophyll b structure more stable (Guiamét et al. 1991). The staygreen of these mutants may be classified as Type C or cosmetic staygreen (Sakuraba et al. 2015;Thomas and Howarth 2000) which is characterized by the permanence of the greenness, but with unaffected loss of photosynthetic function. Mutant lines have also been used to study staygreen in rice (Cha et al. 2002), wheat (Spano et al. 2003;Thomas et al. 2002;Rampino et al. 2006;Tian et al. 2012), Arabidopsis (Grbic and Bleecker 1995) and Festuca (Hauck et al. 1997). However, if the genetic lesion resulting in plant greenness persistence is also associated with improved plant performance, the staygreen is classified as functional staygreen. An example of functional staygreen is in sorghum where some genotypes remain green and give higher grain weights than the non staygreen genotypes (Duncan et al. 1981;Borrell et al. 2000). In the Seri/Babax population functional staygreen may be controlled by chromosomes where common QTL for Stg, yield and yield components were detected, such as 4B. On the contrary, the staygreen phenotype was unlinked to yield improvement on chromosome 7D suggesting that the locus controlled the cosmetic persistence of greenness.The staygreen character is a complex trait; its expression is environment dependent suggesting high G × E interaction (Christopher et al. 2008;Bogard et al. 2011). For example, in sorghum the staygreen attribute is only observed under drought conditions (van Oosterom et al. 1996). In the current study, it was observed that the greenness decay pattern of particular genotypes varied with the growth conditions, resulting in different types of fitted curves (Fig. 5) when grown under moderate, hot or intense heat stress.Results from this study showed the staygreen attribute to be positively and significantly associated with yield and yield components in bread wheat grown under heat-stressed, irrigated conditions. The NDVI decay trend during grainfilling showed genotypic differences within the Seri/Babax population, and that the type of curve followed during greenness decay was strongly associated with general plant performance parameters. However, the type-curve for greenness decay is highly environment dependent. The association of the Stg character, the rate of senescence and all staygreen related traits with stress tolerance is supported by results showing that the same genomic regions have an effect on yield, grain weight, kernel number, canopy temperature, NDVI and also the length and rate of grainfilling. The staygreen character is clearly complex genetically with environmental influences that require further exploration.Author contribution statement R Suzuky Pinto conducted field experiments, performed data analysis and led the write-up; Marta S. Lopes conducted field experiments, performed data analysis and provided useful advice for data interpretation; Nicholas C. Collins contributed to data interpretation and preparation of the manuscript; Matthew P. Reynolds designed the experiments and participated in 1 3 all aspects of data analysis, interpretation and writing of the manuscript.","tokenCount":"7414"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0151806475.json b/data/part_1/0151806475.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2fae2f5dde25c179d8eb948e0581170f51085e96 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0151806475.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"860a8650360310ff044606d58b2974bc","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e9ca2662-1f22-4123-88fa-99bf82b6e14c/retrieve","id":"-1249953102"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"edbf0327-8066-400b-9b11-1a4660474a6b","pagecount":"16","content":"-Đảm bảo chất lượng: rõ nguồn gốc, được kiểm tra.-Tránh nhiễm: phân, hóa chất, thuốc bảo vệ thực vật, thuốc chữa bệnh.-Thức ăn không chứa mầm bệnh: nấu chín thức ăn.- The CGIAR Research Program on Livestock aims to increase the productivity and profitability of livestock agrifood systems in sustainable ways, making meat, milk and eggs more available and affordable across the developing world.This presentation is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.The program thanks all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions to the CGIAR system livestock.cgiar.orgMore meat milk and eggs by and for the poor","tokenCount":"105"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0157850904.json b/data/part_1/0157850904.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..298236ee1fab716784168d84bca1f119f1c5ad03 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0157850904.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"f8800b72cbfb23234a0985455d84279e","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/807cf61f-da93-496d-8f9b-6ef7c4e3f491/retrieve","id":"1197141420"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"e8f134c9-eba6-4f08-919f-b1b94254981c","pagecount":"64","content":"This report synthesizes findings from the CPWF project number 71 titled \"Commune Agroecosystem Analysis to Support Decision Making for Water Allocation for Fisheries and Agriculture in the Tonle Sap Wetland System.\"A broad group of contributors and a wide range of institutions in Cambodia and international partners were involved in various aspects of CPWF PN71. The important contributions from all of the following institutions are greatly appreciated.under this project and whose contribution played a critical role in achieving positive project outcomes. Finally, a big thank you to Sophie Nguyen-Khoa of the Challenge Program on Water and Food who was instrumental in designing PN71 and was its first project leader and for her continuing advice, support and encouragement during the entire project period.Funding support for this project was obtained from the European Commission (EC) and International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).This document has been produced with the financial assistance of IFAD and the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of IFAD and the European Union.The Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) contributes to efforts of the international community to ensure global diversions of water to agriculture are maintained at the level of the year 2000. It is a multi-institutional research initiative that aims to increase the resilience of social and ecological systems through better water management for food production. Through its broad partnerships, it conducts research that leads to impact on the poor and to policy change.The CPWF conducts action-oriented research in nine river basins in Africa, Asia and Latin America, focusing on crop water productivity, fisheries and aquatic ecosystems, community arrangements for sharing water, integrated river basin management, and institutions and policies for successful implementation of developments in the water-food-environment nexus.The Project on Commune Agroecosystem Analysis to Support Decision Making for Water Allocation for Fisheries and Agriculture in the Tonle Sap Wetland System was undertaken with the aim of improving fisheries considerations in the Commune Agroecosystem Analysis (CAEA) process undertaken in Cambodia, to facilitate better planning at the commune level. Under this project a number of changes were made to the CAEA tools and process and pilot tested in an adaptive, iterative manner in four communes -two that had conducted a CAEA previously and two that had not. Results and analyses indicated that the project had significantly strengthened the manner in which livelihoods, water resources and fisheries are now addressed by CAEA. The revised CAEA guidance manual has also shown potential for having wider uptake, and a number of tools have been used by several other projects within Cambodia.Each report in the CPWF Project Report series is reviewed by an independent research supervisor and the CPWF Secretariat, under the oversight of the Associate Director. The views expressed in these reports are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food. Reports may be copied freely and cited with due acknowledgment. Before taking any action based on the information in this publication, readers are advised to seek expert professional, scientific and technical advice.Senaratna Sellamuttu, S., Mith, S., Hoanh, C.T., Johnston, R., Baran, E., Dubois, M., Soeun, M., Craig, I., Nam, S., and L. Smith. 2010. Commune agroecosystem analysis to support decision making for water allocation for fisheries and agriculture in the Tonle Sap wetland system. CPWF Project Report Series. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Challenge Program for Water and Food, 63 pp.CAEA is a participatory approach that enables local communities to improve decision making at the commune level. The CAEA approach was initiated in Cambodia in 2001, but until 2008 it focused mainly on agricultural issues, while the fisheries sector closely interlinked to agriculture in Cambodia had not been adequately addressed. In this regard, the Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) Project Number 71 titled \"Commune Agroecosystem Analysis to Support Decision Making for Water Allocation for Fisheries and Agriculture in the Tonle Sap Wetland System\" was conducted between 2008 and 2010. This project aimed to improve fisheries considerations in the CAEA process that would facilitate better planning at the commune level in addition to identifying institutional and policy considerations.• A good example of a demand-driven piece of research that has had a high degree of success. The Department of Agricultural Extension (DAE) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Cambodia (MAFF) recognized the need to strengthen the fisheries aspects of CAEA and requested for assistance to improve this component through this research project.• Successful incorporation of fisheries parameters in relation to fisheries biology, water resources and livelihoods into the CAEA process. The results and analyses have clearly shown that CPWF PN71 has significantly strengthened the manner in which these aspects are now addressed by CAEA, compared to a previous narrower focus solely on agricultural production systems.• Since 2004 the use of CAEA has been officially adopted as a national policy for agricultural development, with the DAE of the MAFF as the executing agency. In this regard, the revised CAEA methodology (incorporating fisheries aspects) under PN71 is to be institutionalized by MAFF and used in future CAEA assessments in Cambodia and, therefore, there has been direct influence at the policy level through the project.• The revised CAEA guidance manual has also shown potential for having wider uptake and a number of tools have been used by several other projects within Cambodia as well as in Lao PDR.Cambodia is the fourth largest producer of freshwater fish in the world (Keskinen 2003) with an estimated total catch of approximately 400,000 tons per year (t/yr) (Van Zalinge and Nao 1999). Fish and fish products are therefore considered an important source of nutrition, livelihood and income for the entire country, especially in the rural areas (Ahmed et al. 1998in Keskinen 2003).In the Tonle Sap area particularly, fishing-related activities play a very important role. In villages close to the lake border, fishing naturally forms the major livelihood activity of many people. However, even in the floodplain in areas not adjoining permanent water bodies or small rivers or streams, fisheries often play a critical role in terms of subsistence. For instance, during the flooding or wet season, fishing takes place in flooded forest areas and rice fields (Keskinen 2003). Moreover, it appears that in the dry season, people from many communes migrate to the floodplain area from their villages and engage in fishing. Rice cultivation alone is inadequate to obtain income for daily subsistence, especially during certain times of the year and, therefore, farmers have diversified their livelihood activities and engage in fishing. Thus fisheries and farming systems are closely interlinked in Cambodia and the preservation and enhancement of both systems, and the contributions that these can make to the livelihoods of the poor require a comprehensive and integrated approach.Agroecosystems Analysis (AEA) is a methodology for the analysis of agricultural livelihood systems and for planning and prioritizing research and development activities.It was developed in the late 1970s and has since been used for research and extension planning in a range of locations and environments. In Cambodia, the AEA at the commune level was initiated in 2001, and in 2004 this approach was officially adopted as a national policy for agricultural development, with the DAE of the MAFF as the executing agency. Commune Agroecosystems Analysis (CAEA) is used by the DAE for agroecological analyses at the commune level and is the primary needs-assessment and planning tool for the agriculture sector. By mid-2010 a CAEA had been conducted at least once in over 500 of the 1,621 communes nationwide.CAEA uses multidisciplinary investigation and participatory analysis to understand and describe the major farming systems practiced in each commune, and to identify and prioritize the most important problems facing the farmers. Further, systems analysis is then conducted to plan interventions to address problems and opportunities identified.In the original CAEA there was however a clear demand for the fisheries component to be improved. In this regard, the Challenge Program for Water and Food (CPWF) Project Number 71 titled \"Commune Agroecosystem Analysis to Support Decision Making for Water Allocation for Fisheries and Agriculture in the Tonle Sap Wetland System\" was conducted. The main aim of the project was to improve fisheries considerations in the CAEA process that would facilitate better planning at the commune level in addition to identifying institutional and policy considerations. This included not only the biophysical aspects of fisheries but also the socioeconomic, livelihoods and governance aspects as well to ensure a holistic view of the main issues that need to be taken on board.As a result of PN71, a number of changes to the CAEA tools were made and subsequently field-tested in the four pilot CAEA exercises (in two communes that had an earlier CAEA report and two communes that had not). Changes were of two main types: First, entirely new tools were introduced to address important water resource, fishery and livelihood issues not covered by the original CAEA tools. Second, existing tools were modified to better address key issues in a more complete or comprehensive manner. At the end of the testing phase, an assessment was made of each individual tool to gauge its effectiveness and the benefits it provided compared to the original CAEA procedures.It is clear from the project results and analyses that the CPWF PN71 has significantly improved the way fisheries, water resources and livelihoods are now addressed by CAEA.When comparing the new CAEA outputs and previous CAEAs conducted in the two control communes it is apparent that the revised CAEAs exhibit an emerging recognition of the importance of awareness-raising and capacity development at the community level as compared to the previous narrower focus solely on agricultural production systems.Moreover, the continued application of the PN71 outputs such as the revised CAEA guidance manual beyond the life span of the project ensures the increased impact of PN71. For example, the DAE plans to use the revised version of the CAEA Manual (incorporating fisheries aspects) in future CAEA assessments in Cambodia. In addition, a number of revised CAEA tools have been used by several other projects within Cambodia thus showing its potential for wider uptake and representing an opportunity to introduce effective changes throughout the country. There is also the potential for CAEA to be adopted in neighboring countries (such as Lao PDR) -for example in the Agro-Biodiversity Initiative (TABI) in Lao PDR. TABI is a long-term commitment by the Government of Lao PDR and the Swiss Development Corporation (SDC).In the economy of most Mekong Basin countries, agriculture is the dominant sector. However, the majority of the rural population also depends on the river and associated floodplain wetlands directly for food and livelihood purposes. In Cambodia, for instance, freshwater capture fisheries ranks fourth in the world in terms of estimated total catch (approximately 400,000 t/yr) and these fisheries account for 31% of the GDP contribution of the primary sector of the economy. These fisheries are vulnerable to long-term ecohydrological modification of critical habitats arising from agricultural and water management practices. However, some of these practices can also support fisheries or increase overall system productivity. For this to happen, the consideration of fisheries in decision-making processes related to developmental investments and activities is crucial. While national strategic plans and policy statements, including the most recent Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP), acknowledge and give weight to fisheries, fisheries aspects of agroecosystem analysis are relatively limited and data on these aspects are lacking. Overall, the political ecology of current decision making is heavily skewed towards the agronomic perspective.The preservation and enhancement of both fisheries and farming systems, and the contributions that these can make to the livelihoods of the poor require a comprehensive and integrated approach. A clear threat to fisheries arises from the intensification and expansion of irrigated farming as well as from other infrastructural development on existing fisheries. Despite this recognized threat, planning and development often lack adequate assessment of the environmental and socioeconomic implications of agricultural development on fisheries.This neglect is mainly due to a lack of understanding of the interactions between fisheries, agriculture and water management and respective cross-scale linkages. As a result, the inadequate evaluation of fisheries coexisting with both current and emerging farming systems can lead to unsustainable or undesirable use of natural resources, conflicts between farmers and fishers, loss of access to water bodies, missed opportunities to sustain or create employment and enhance livelihoods, and degradation of the ecosystem. A more comprehensive and integrated analysis of biophysical, socioeconomic and governance processes is required to understand and assess the complex and seasonally dynamic interactions between fishing and farming, and aquatic ecosystems.Agroecosystems Analysis (AEA) is a methodology for the analysis of agricultural livelihood systems and for planning and prioritizing research and development activities.It was developed at Chiang Mai University in the late 1970s and has since been used for research and extension planning in a range of locations and environments.In Cambodia, the existing CAEA system that has been adopted by the Ministry of Agriculture since 2001 is commendable in seeking to encompass the issues related to water, land and socioeconomic development while recognizing the potential trade-offs between productivity, equity and sustainability of agroecosystems. CAEA is used by the DAE for agroecological analyses at the commune level and is the primary needsassessment and planning tool for the agriculture sector. CAEA uses multidisciplinary investigation and participatory analysis to understand and describe the major farming systems practiced in each commune, and to identify and prioritize the most important problems that the farmers face. Moreover, the existing data collected were insufficient to encompass the range of variables required to address the combined use of water by fisheries and agriculture and development interactions. As a result, significant uncertainties were creating a bias or impeding effective decision making on the management of water for coexisting agriculture and fisheries systems. CAEA users recognized this weakness and were in agreement that the water and fisheries component be strengthened.In this regard, CPWF Project Number 71 titled \"Water Allocation in the Tonle Sap\" was conducted between 2008 and 2010. This project aimed to improve fisheries considerations in data collection systems and in particular the CAEA process that would facilitate better planning at the commune level, in addition to identifying institutional and policy considerations. As a consequence, the revised CAEA adopted a more holistic approach through incorporation of fisheries variables and also looking at land, water, livelihoods and institutional issues that influence commune development planning.1. Identification of key fisheries variables in the context of fisheries biology, land and water, livelihoods and institutions, to be considered by CAEA through the contributions of an interdisciplinary team of scientists and local stakeholders at community and provincial levels. 2. Testing of the revised CAEA through a comparative analysis of initial versus revised CAEA in selected paired sites (where two sites had earlier CAEA reports and two had not). 3. Finalizing revision of the CAEA and highlighting management and policy implications.A common methodology in terms of the CAEA review, testing and revision is included for land and water resources, fisheries ecology and livelihoods and institutions. Thereafter, the results from these different components can be described separately.The methodology adopted in the PN71 project was based on a three-stage process:• Stage one -screening and scoping • Stage two -field-testing of the revised CAEA tools and methodologies • Stage three -finalizing revision of the CAEA and highlighting management and policy implicationsEach stage included a number of key activities. In stage one (screening and scoping), key variables and existing data collection systems in the context of the CAEA were reviewed and the range of additional fisheries parameters needed to be considered in the CAEA determined. The review was essentially organized into four components -fisheries parameters in the context of (i) land and water resources; (ii) fisheries biology; (iii) livelihood and governance; and (iv) integration across the first three sectors and disciplines.Each component proposed a revision of CAEA from their perspective and analysis, using the knowledge gained through screening activities and literature reviews. The integration of all revised outputs led to the first revision of CAEA to enhance the integration of fisheries in agroecosystem analysis. The revisions essentially recommended incorporation of new variables to CAEA and the adjustment of existing tools and the incorporation of new tools adapted to the existing CAEA structure. Fisheries parameters in the context of fisheries biology, land and water, livelihoods and governance were incorporated into the CAEA process for field-testing, based on what was feasible, given the existing capacity, capabilities and resources -so that the process would not become unmanageable.A stakeholder workshop was held thereafter (in September 2008), to present the first results of the project and recommendations for integrating fisheries in agroecosystem analysis, in particular at the commune level. Workshop outputs further contributed towards refining the CAEA revisions proposed. The workshop participants were mainly government officials from the Departments of Agriculture, Fisheries, Environment and Water resources, a few NGOs, and the project partners and team.In stage two (field-testing of the adapted CAEA), two paired sites (communes) were selected (where two sites had earlier CAEA reports and two had not), for the pilot testing of the revised CAEA. The selection of suitable sites was carried out using the following key criteria:Coverage of a wide range of agroecological zones Significance of fisheries in the commune Pairs of sites 'with vs. without' implementation of CAEA At least one site with significant irrigation development On the basis of the above criteria four communes (in two provinces) were selected (Figure 1): • Chamnar Krom (with CAEA) and Samproch (without CAEA) in Kampong Thom Province • Sna Ansar (with CAEA) and Sya (without CAEA) in Pursat Province Figure 1. Map of the four selected communes.To undertake a comparative analysis of the old and revised methodology, two of the communes selected had an earlier CAEA report and two did not. Both sites where the adapted CAEA was implemented for the first time, were closely comparable and with similar conditions to the communes where an original CAEA was carried out before the methodology revision (Table 1).Table 1. Overview of the agroecological zones in the four communes.Pilot testing in the four communes was carried out between January and October 2009. Each testing cycle per site (commune) took approximately one month -5 days for the CAEA orientation, data collection and preliminary analysis; 3 days for the rapid rural appraisal (RRA), 3 days for systems analysis; and the rest for report writing. After each pilot testing in a commune, the CAEA Manual was revised taking on board the lessons learned during data collection and analysis. While some bigger changes were made during the first two rounds of testing, thereafter it was mainly fine-tuning and further refinements of the methodologies and tools that were used. Revisions and recommendations were made on both the CAEA tools and the process. After the pilot testing was completed in the first two sites, a 2-day 'mini-stakeholder' workshop was held in June 2009. This was used to reflect further on the revisions made in the first two rounds of testing and to discuss and obtain feedback from key stakeholders before proceeding to undertake the field-testing in the third and fourth sites that did not have an earlier CAEA report. Two key aspects were covered in this workshop -a review of the CAEA tools and the CAEA process.To compare original and revised CAEA assessments, the evaluation focused on a number of aspects including ease of use, the variables included in the assessment, and the implications for decision makers. The revision was carried out in the context of the different components, fisheries biology, land and water, livelihoods and governance.The third stage consisted of finalizing revision of the CAEA and highlighting management and policy implications. A final stakeholder workshop was held in March 2010, the main objective being to present and discuss the results from the CAEA field-testing in the four communes and discuss the revised CAEA Manual. The extent of benefits to the commune planning processes through the revised CAEA approach was explored. Steps to improve the institutionalization of the CAEA results in the commune development planning process were also discussed.A number of spatial and temporal tools were applied during the RRA stage of CAEA to gather information on land, water resource and fisheries at the commune level, which are:• Maps and overlays In the old CAEA manual true-to-scale sketch map layers for overlaying of administrative boundaries, land use, soil types, water resources, etc., were used to identify AEA zones.It was based more on diagrams and schemas than on GIS maps. In the revised CAEA Manual a specific checklist is provided with rivers, streams, boeungs (natural ponds or small lakes) and other important water resources (including main fishing grounds, places for fish refuge, feeding and breeding -thus showing much utility for fisheries considerations) and irrigation systems (functioning systems and those in disrepair).The advantages of the revised tool are (i) better identification of key water bodies and infrastructure. For example, both Sna Ansar and Sya are located on the Tonle Sap, and the mapping/overlay tool shows the extent of flooded forest in each commune, which is an area particularly important to fisheries. This is an improvement over the previous CAEA approach, where zones were identified but not clearly mapped; and (ii) this tool is also useful in applying other tools (transect diagrams, etc.).The disadvantage of the revised tool are the need of experts and more information to draw new information types accurately and to scale on sketch maps. Satellite imagery (e.g., Google Earth) could help, as illustrated in an example of Chamnar Krom Commune shown in Figure 2.Figure 2. Example of using satellite imagery for maps and overlays.This is a new tool that did not exist in the old CAEA and was developed during the PN71. It is used to analyze the various uses and characteristics of the water bodies present in the commune. The matrix shows water body type vs. attributes, including accessibility of each type to provide stable, year-round benefits, comparison of productivity levels and identification of reasons for the differences.The advantages of this tool are that i) it provides additional information on water resources and water use for agriculture and fisheries; ii) it provides information on seasonality of water bodies and connectivity between water bodies which were considerations largely absent using the prior tools; (iii) water use conflicts were identified using this tool in both Sna Ansar and Sya, which were not identified with the previous CAEA tools; and (iv) it gives a framework for water resource use analysis.The issues or difficulties in application are that i) it is important to be specific about the characteristics of water body types in different zones (e.g., ponds are permanent in the floodplain, but ephemeral in uplands); and (ii) there is some overlap with the water resource use matrix introduced below (Table 2).Chamnar Krom reservoirs (constructed in 2007) This tool is used to improve understanding about the use of different water sources in the commune at different times of the year and was included in the old 2007 CAEA Manual, but was not applied under this matrix form in the original commune reports. In the revised CAEA Manual a new template is used, with additional parameters on resource characteristics (water quantity, quality, productivity, reliability, equitable access) that are explicitly linked to the WBAAM through water body types (Figure 3).The advantages of this revised tool are that (i) it provides details on multiple uses of water, including fisheries; (ii) it helps in identifying water sources (providing a check on maps and WBAAM); (iii) it includes three categories relevant to fisheries: fishing, aquaculture, and fish productivity rankings and shows which type of water body(ies) is(are) the most important for fisheries in both the wet and dry seasons (i.e., in Sya, the river and natural lake in the dry season vs. only the natural lake in the dry season);(iv) it can also reveal opportunities for fisheries (i.e., canals/reservoirs not being used for fish production); and (v) the template is easy to follow, with questions that are meaningful for the communities.Its shortcomings are that (i) some overlap occurs with WBAAM on reliability, access and quality; and (ii) it requires a degree of prior knowledge to assess/estimate some of the parameters.Water Flow diagrams are used to describe the flow of materials, money, information, labor, etc., between the different zones in the commune. In the old CAEA Manual, a range of visual representations were suggested, with a note that these are \"equally valid, and selection should be made according to the preference and familiarity of the participants.\" Minimal information on fisheries was included in these diagrams.In the revised CAEA Manual, the flow diagram is split into two separate diagrams and color coding is introduced to present the up-down system hierarchy, flows into and out of the commune and zone-to-zone interactions, including fish migration in wet and dry seasons (Figure 4). The advantages of these flow diagrams are that i) they are easier to create with the contribution of participants, and (ii) they constitute a clearer representation of the flow of different products through the interactions among zones.In most cases, land and water issues are not explicitly included in flow diagrams in the current reports, but are represented within other flows (such as inputs, production), since land elements do not \"flow\" (although inputs such as fertilizers do) and as the flow of water is usually obvious, it needs to be included only if there is something unusual (e.g., pumping between areas). Where water quality is an issue, flow of pollutants should be captured.Transect diagrams are used to describe and compare agroecosystems based on a list of physical and socioeconomic parameters. Digital photos can be used to illustrate the ecosystems. Before PN71, this tool included fisheries in both land use and opportunities, but fisheries were only associated with the water resources zone where wild fish were identified as a resource (not in other zones). Several issues and opportunities pertaining to this zone were identified, but other opportunities in other zones were possibly overlooked.In the revised CAEA new variables on water resources, fish and nutrition are included (Table 4), and an iterative process of revision and refinement throughout the CAEA process is proposed.The advantages of the revised CAEA are that i) additional information is provided, so that participants can clearly see the relationships and connectivity from one zone to another across different sectors; (ii) participants can check data provided from other sources; and (iii) CAEA provides an initial analysis of important problems and opportunities. However, a disadvantage of this tool is that its use is time-consuming. In the old CAEA Manual, land management strategies were developed for agroecological zones by using a template of land type, land use, strategy, and technical elements by zone. The strategies were not provided in this form in reports but instead only identification of issues/questions/innovations was mentioned. In the revised CAEA Manual, strategies for management of water and fisheries resources strategies are added separately. The advantages of this revised version are (i) adding an important water dimension to the strategies and (ii) explicit consideration of interactions between land, water and fisheries management. The disadvantage is the complexity in adding strategies for a dynamic resource such as water that is, in many cases, out of the management capacity of the commune. Developing strategies requires \"visioning\" of optimal future use for each zone. There was a perception at commune level that this is difficult and/or risky when based on estimated or incomplete data, limited capacity and limited understanding of land use planning at the commune level. In addition, strategies have not been used widely in developing commune plans, and so are not linked to funding streams and are seen as an academic exercise.However, designing strategies for each zone is a crucial component of CAEA, as it is a way of integrating plans and proposals from all sectors and capturing potential interactions and impacts. It is an important step in thinking beyond the current status to the desired future, and the steps needed to get there. To realize their full value, strategies must be better integrated into the commune planning process.Before PN71, this tool was called a \"commune profile,\" and gave general background information from 1970 to the present. Data were arranged only by data per se in this early version of the tool, and were not grouped under headings (such as fisheries, etc.) After PN71, this tool attempts to provide a much more detailed historical record of agroecosystem characteristics and changes from 1960 to the present (this change was incorporated after the first pilot testing in Sna Ansar). This profile is more organized, and includes explicit information on fisheries, particularly changes in the proportion of fishers in the commune and the abundance of fish over time. While this information is clearly presented in the revised CAEA, it would be of greater use to further summarize the information to make it clearer where, when, and by what degree changes have occurred, rather than exhaustively listing the characteristics of each time period. In this manner, the 2010 CAEA of Sna Ansar serves as a preferable template, as the CAEA historical profile of Sna Ansar (Table 6) is relatively brief and places more emphasis on important changes. Table 6. Partial historical profile of Sna Ansar as pertaining to fisheries, circa 2010 (adapted from Sna Ansar 2010 CAEA). 1970-1975 1975-1979 1979-1990 1990-1993 1993-1998 1998 -2003 2003-2009 Environmen tImpacts begin Large impacts Periods Pre-1979Pre- 1979Pre- -1990Pre- 1990Pre- -1998Pre- 1998Pre- -2009 Before PN71, this tool presented a wide range of data pertaining to commune activities arranged by seasonal occurrence. Data on fisheries, however, were lacking from the original CAEA, as in the 2005 CAEA of Sna Ansar, the seasonal calendar makes no mention of fishing activities. The 2008 CAEA of Chamnar Krom, meanwhile, only includes seasonal prices of fish, again omitting information on seasonal fishing activities.After PN71, this tool has been revised to better summarize the wide variety of activities in the context of when they are performed throughout the year, including fisheries. For example, in the 2010 Chamnar Krom CAEA, this tool identifies the timing and location of seasonal fishing activities. While useful for a summary of seasonal activities, from a fisheries perspective, some of the information here is redundant following the tools already discussed, particularly the Water-Body Attribute Analysis Matrix, which has a \"seasonality\" section that includes the bulk of the information presented for fisheries in the seasonal calendar (Figure 5).Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 Climate conditionFishing activities -In commune (lake, rice field, creeks) -Outside commune (lake and stream) Figure 5. Seasonal calendar of fishing activities from Chamnar Krom (adapted from 2010 CAEA) (numbers 1 to 12 and 1 to 6 represent names of months of the year in ascending order).The key results from the CAEA reports in terms of priority issues and actions for land and water management are set out in Table 7 for the northern communes (Chamnar Krom and Samproch) and in Table 8 for the southern communes (Sya and Sna Ansar).Chamnar Krom and Samproch are adjoining communes, and have similar issues and priorities. Samproch includes areas along the Tonle Sap Lake, whereas Chamnar Krom is separated from the lake by the Phat Sanday Commune, and the communities distinguished slightly different AEZs (see Table 7). Priority issues and actions identified varied between the different AEZs as shown in Table 7.In the 2007 report, in Chamnar Krom, the main focus was on issues relating directly to agricultural production (rice cultivation methods, irrigation infrastructure, management of fishing grounds), and strategies were developed for the commune as a whole, not for the different zones. In the 2010 report, using the new CAEA Manual, strategies were differentiated across zones, and there was a stronger emphasis on resource management, as well as on production. The main issues identified were:• Canal rehabilitation to improve irrigation access for wet-and dry-season rice, and dry-season vegetables.• Management of the 21 irrigation reservoirs constructed in 2007, and assessment and management of their impacts on fish and ecology.• Improved on-farm water management, through construction of dykes, leveling of fields and construction and management of community ponds.• Provision of reliable domestic water supplies was identified as the most pressing need in the dry season; options were identified to use existing irrigation canals to supply domestic water, and for multiple use for gardens and livestock.• Protection of flooded forest and grassland areas as fisheries habitats.In Samproch (2010 report) the main focus was on:• Improved access to water for rice, cash crops and animals, through feasibility studies on irrigation, rainwater harvesting, and extension and training on irrigated farming.• Improved water management for recession and dry-season rice through community management of 18 reservoirs constructed in 2007 (including assessment of the impacts of these reservoirs on ecology and fisheries), establishment of a farmer water user group and training in irrigation system operation and management.• Improved on-farm water management, through construction of dikes, leveling of fields, construction and management of community ponds and introduction of water-saving technologies• Lack of domestic water in the dry season was identified as a significant issue, with impacts on health as well as on nutrition, due to constraints on dry-season production from gardens and livestock.• Protection of flooded forest and grassland areas as fisheries habitat.There is an obvious commonality of issues and actions identified across the two communes.Both these recent reports identify a review of the new reservoirs (constructed in both communes in 2007) as a high priority. Concern was expressed regarding construction of reservoirs without consultation, training or impact assessment, and without consideration of issues of landownership and access. High priority is given to both assessing the impacts of disruption in water flow on grasslands and fish and identifying methods to operate the reservoirs to mitigate these impacts.In terms of the fisheries sector, in the reports prepared using the new manual, there is a notable shift in emphasis from catch control (illegal fishing and management of fishing grounds) to inclusion of habitat protection (management of flooded forests and natural ponds). The new reports demonstrate a greater awareness of impacts of land and water use, and the significance of the condition of the resource base for production of both fish and crops (e.g., soil and water pollution). There is also a new focus on community-based conservation groups (flooded forests, wildlife) as well as resource groups (water user group, community fishery group), and active engagement in conservation initiatives such as demonstration sites for habitat management and replanting days for forests. Note: X denotes topics where it was not clear a) which specific units had these issues and b) whether they were relevant for all units.Sna Ansar and Sya communes are close, but not adjacent. Both include areas along the Tonle Sap Lake, but Sna Ansar runs back from the lake further into the uplands, and the community in Sna Ansar has identified mountain and upland zones that are not present in Sya that, however, has distinguished more zones within the lowland terrace and floodplain. Priority issues and actions identified varied between the different AEZs as shown in Table 8.In the report prepared for Sna Ansar in 2005, strategies focused on production methods, and control of fish catch through community fishery and awareness of fisheries law. Strategies were not differentiated across zones. In the 2010 report for Sna Ansar, an additional zone was identified which distinguishes the floodplain from the zone of open water, recognizing the importance of the seasonally wetted zone as a habitat. Strategies and actions were differentiated for the different zones. Priority issues identified included:• A proposal for the a) Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) as part of the Commune Development Plan to establish a Social Land Concession in order to improve access to land for poorer families, discourage land grabbing by powerful interests, and prevent deforestation and b) a preliminary survey to identify available land and land-poor families. • Irrigation improvement, including rehabilitation of existing systems for wet-and dry-season rice and diversified cash cropping, and provision of water for domestic purposes. This includes feasibility studies, field surveys, training and capacity development.• Improved on-farm water management through construction of dikes, leveling, community and farm ponds, and introduction of water saving technologies.• Protection of upland forests, flooded forests and grassland areas as habitats.The report prepared using the new manual has a stronger focus on protection of habitats not only for fisheries, but also for the uplands; conservation zones are proposed in the uplands to protect biodiversity and catchment areas. The newer report demonstrates a greater awareness of a diversity of water sources, with proposals to develop storage in the uplands and groundwater in lowland terraces, as well as improvements to irrigation infrastructure. Water quality and sanitation issues are identified as a priority, with an understanding of the impacts of livestock-raising on water quality and proposals for improved livestock management in the lake zone.In Sya, priority issues identified included:• Improved water access for rice, cash crops and animals through improvement of secondary and tertiary canals from the Charek Reservoir for both wet-and dryseason use.• Improved irrigation management, through extension and training on irrigated farming and sustainable operation and maintenance (O&M) of irrigation systems, and the establishment of a farmer water user group (based on participatory irrigation management principles).• Improved on-farm water management through construction of dikes, leveling, community and farm ponds, and introduction of water saving technologies.• Provision of reliable domestic water supplies was identified as the most pressing need in the dry season; options were identified to use existing irrigation canals to supply domestic water, and for multiple use for gardens and livestock.• Implementation of integrated water resources management (IWRM) principles to support multiple uses of water (fisheries, irrigation, domestic use, etc.).• Protection of flooded forest and grassland areas.In both communes, the newer reports identified the need for community-based conservation groups (flooded forests, wildlife) as well as resource groups (water user group, community fishery group). Water quality management (sanitation/livestock) 6Note: X denotes topics where it was not clear a) which specific units had these issues and b) whether they were relevant for all units.* Numbers refer to the AEZs for which particular strategies were proposed in the reports, as follows: Common issues emerged from all communes regarding access to irrigation and on-farm water management. Although there were differences of emphasis in the proposed solutions, all communes identified the need for information and training on farming and irrigation techniques, and O&M of irrigation infrastructure. Similarly, all communes identified the need to establish and/or better support farmer water user groups.Provision of reliable domestic water supplies in the dry season was identified as a very high priority in all areas. Suggested solutions included a more integrated approach to water supplies, with multipurpose use of canals and ponds for agriculture, fish and domestic use.All communes recognized the importance of community approaches to land and water management, and proposed the establishment of relevant community management groups (farmer water user groups, conservation groups for flooded forests).The reports prepared using the new CAEA manuals demonstrated a broadening of focus from dominantly production issues (rice aquaculture, livestock) to a combination of both production and natural resources management, and a much greater understanding of the importance of habitat and resource conditions (including water quality) in ensuring production. The newer reports had greater emphasis on water in terms of a greater diversity of water sources, greater awareness of issues of water access and a more integrated approach to multipurpose use of water supplies.With regard to the revised tools, some of the important aspects that have emerged are as follows:• Maps and overlays are important tools for spatial analysis; in particular, the water resources are strongly linked to the availability and development of infrastructure; and they have significant impacts on fisheries. The development of media, Internet, mobile phones, etc., also provides significant information to the communities in identifying the location of their resources.• WBAAM is a new tool to support the Water Resource Use Matrix to provide detailed variations in water resources that are important for agriculture and, in particular, for fisheries and aquaculture. A constraint in using these tools is the dynamics of water that requires more regular updated information on its variations; therefore, these tools should be reapplied more often in combination with other water-related tools such as the land and water management strategies.• Two color flow diagrams for system hierarchy and zone-to-zone are useful tools to show the linkage in production systems and also the sharing of resources and benefits that are strongly influenced by the institutional structure and the culture of the communities. These tools are supported by the transect diagram that presents the interactions of resource uses across agroecological zones and impacts on the new focused products of this CAEA revision, i.e., fish and other aquatic products.• Land and water resources management strategies are identified more explicitly with the revised CAEA Manual. The outputs are more useful information to the community and provincial as well as sectoral development plans. The process of developing the strategies can also be considered as a participatory planning exercise with a bottom-up approach that brings up comments of the communities to the development strategies developed by higher-level managers. On the other hand, during this exercise, the communities also have opportunities to understand and revise the existing strategies.Under the livelihoods analysis, there were six key tools used in the CAEA approach in the RRA stage. These are:• Wealth ranking• Developing livelihood profiles• Gender analysis• Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs)• Gross margin analysis• Market and value-chain analysisIn addition, relevant fisheries livelihood variables were incorporated into all the other spatial, temporal and economic analyses and decision-making tools as well.Wealth ranking is a popular tool used in PRA methods. Wealth rankings undertaken by local people can be used to study the variations in the poverty levels within a community. They are useful not only to determine what criteria communities use to measure wealth, and what their definitions and indicators of wealth are, but also to learn about the socioeconomic stratifications that exist within a community (Reitbergen-McCraken and Narayan 1998). Usually, wealth rankings are conducted at the village level to better understand the variations in the wealth status of different households within the village.In the case of the original CAEA, wealth-ranking exercises were conducted at the commune level usually to develop general farming system typologies for each wealth class within the commune that was then used for comparison and analysis. They were used to gain insights into the characteristics, needs and opportunities of each wealth class, particularly of the poor. Wealth analysis helped refine key questions to ensure that they target the poorest as a priority (CAEA 2007). In this case, it is not possible to collect information on individual households in the commune.In the case of the revised CAEA, for the wealth-ranking exercise, the criteria for distinguishing between wealth groups were broadened to include fisheries-related criteria that can help differentiate between different wealth groups, e.g., type of fishing engaged in, different gear owned and used, and relative income obtained from fishing.In addition, the importance of ensuring that the correct participants were engaged in the exercise was emphasized. For instance, it was made clear that respondents should include those engaged in fishing (both men and women), different age groups and, most importantly, representatives from different wealth groups.The advantage of the revised wealth-rankings methodology was that it helped identify fisheries-related issues faced by different wealth groups and helped assess the relative importance of fishing compared to other livelihoods activities.One of the key disadvantages (in both old and new versions) was that there were some difficulties in aggregating wealth-related information at the commune level.This was a new tool developed under PN71 and adopted in testing from the second pilot site onwards. Adapted from the sustainable livelihoods approach, livelihood profiles were developed to provide greater focus and to integrate an assessment of livelihood assets (capital) and key factors that affect livelihood opportunities into the CAEA process.The major income-generating activities within an AE zone provide the focus for this assessment. The tool should be used for each agroecosystem zone individually unless the major livelihood activities are similar across all zones. Usually, up to three major income sources (i.e., livelihood activities) are identified for each agroecosystem. These will often be noted during the identification of agroecosystem zones in the commune during the preliminary analysis (stage 3) of CAEA. They may also be identified based on the findings of the transect walk or wealth ranking.Some activities such as fishing may be found in more than one zone and the assessment for that activity need not be repeated for one commune. But fishing in one zone might be very small-scale, occurring in rice fields and carried out by poor people while fishing in another zone might be in deeper water and require boats and different fishing gear. In this case, the livelihood profile should be completed for each of the two different fishing activities.A table has been designed to fill in each livelihoods profile. The first part of the table identifies who is involved in the activity (record the gender and wealth categories). The second part considers each of the livelihood assets: human, natural, physical, financial and social capital and records the most important of these assets needed for the particular livelihood activity and what may be missing or lacking, either for everyone in the commune or for one or more of the wealth categories.In addition, vulnerability factors are considered. These are aspects that can influence the success of an activity and how much income it generates but are beyond the control of people in the commune. For example, some crops may be more vulnerable to extreme weather or to variation in market prices. Some forms of fishing may be more vulnerable to overfishing by others.Thereafter, key organizations that help an income-generating activity to succeed are noted. This could be a formal organization such as agricultural extension which provides the necessary technical advice, for example, how to control animal diseases. Or it could be an informal village organization which arranges labor-sharing or helps people borrow money to buy inputs.Finally, the laws, rules or customs (institutions) necessary to ensure that the incomegenerating activity is successful and can continue in the long term are recorded.Each row in the table considers whether the issue is the same for all people or whether there are worse problems for women compared to men, or for poor people compared to wealthier people. Any problems identified are noted.Therefore, one of the advantages of the livelihoods profile was that it helped identify problems associated with different livelihoods and key institutions that could help solve the problem.One of the key issues associated with the tool was that the general livelihoods terminology may be unfamiliar to some facilitators who may therefore find difficulties in obtaining the best results from the tool. To address this problem a simple glossary of livelihoods terms was developed and incorporated as an Appendix in the revised CAEA Manual.The Gender Task Analysis tool provides disaggregated information on the proportion of men and women who engage in each livelihood subtask. This provides a better understanding of the different roles played by men and women in the various livelihood activities undertaken in the commune as this will help ensure that the needs of both men and women can be adequately addressed during the formulation of key questions and the designing of solutions and innovation assessments. It will also help in better understanding both the positive and negative impacts potential TIPs could have in the case of gender.In the original CAEA, the Gender Task Analysis simply provided an idea of whether males or females were involved in a particular livelihoods subtask. No information was given on the more detailed labor breakdown. Also more emphasis was placed on agricultural subtasks and less information was gathered on the other livelihood activities in the commune.In the revised CAEA, the specific check list includes a listing of all important livelihood activities in the commune including all fisheries activities, e.g., fishing (for income and consumption), marketing, processing, preparation for cooking, making fishing gear, and so on. Moreover, the role of men and women in each livelihood activity is determined and the labor involvement in terms of gender is quantified as a percentage. The advantage of this is that it gives a clearer picture regarding gender disaggregation in each activity, provides more details in relation to gender-labor breakdown and therefore helps identify target groups for livelihoods training programs that may be linked to innovation assessments and TIPs.The collection of NTFPs is often an important livelihood activity, particularly for poor families. In the context of the CAEA, the term 'NTFPs' has been extended to include aquatic resources found in the flooded forests. It is important to gain an understanding of NTFPs during CAEA because agricultural and other livelihood development activities may impact on their availability. It is also useful to explore possibilities for sustainable harvesting and domestication, especially if the NTFPs are significantly contributing to the livelihood portfolio of poorer families. In the original CAEA there was no disaggregation of collection of NTFPs in terms of gender and no attempt to quantify the decline in NTFPs.In the new version, there is gender disaggregation at the commune level and the decline is quantified as a percentage and reported over the last 5 years. The advantage of this is that presenting the decline in a quantified manner makes it easier to prioritize the key NTFPs that require conservation action or a sustainable use action plan. For example in Sna Ansar, rattan and vine for mat weaving are two important NTFPs from a perspective of livelihoods and these are decreasing significantly. In this case, the possibility of domestication can be explored and also linking to other relevant initiatives, for example, the OPEC FAO project that is working in the floodplains within an area of 100 ha and looking at sustainable use of NTFPs. The gendered differentiation of who is involved in the collection of different NTFPs will help provide a more gender-sensitive targeting approach when undertaking innovation assessments and livelihood programs.Gross margins for major enterprises are developed using information derived from the farmers during the RRA stage. In the original CAEA, gross margins were used to promote a better understanding of local production systems, and to help identify where improvements can be made. With regard to fish and NTFPs, gross margin analyses are generally only conducted for aquaculture or domesticated enterprises in NTFPs, not wild, for capture systems.In the revised CAEA, gross margin analysis is conducted for three enterprises with respect to income including one fisheries enterprise (plus one agriculture-and one livestock-linked). The advantage in terms of fisheries enterprises would be to provide a good idea of the fisheries-related innovations that can be promoted in the commune.One issue facing both old and new versions is the difficulty to get accurate data sometimes (e.g., breakdown of costs, as estimates of most participants are vague).This is a new tool included under the RRA stage of the CAEA process. Value-chain mapping allows for better understanding of market-related problems and opportunities for important livelihood products (crops, livestock, fish, NTFPs, and so on). Value-chain maps show the flow of a product through the marketing chain and help identify where and how value is added to the product by the activities of different actors in the chain.Analysis of completed value-chain maps allows price and market constraints to be identified along with opportunities for enhancing value added by additional or alternative operations by value-chain actors. The advantage of the analysis is that outputs of the value-chain maps can be used to plan market-related interventions (marketing TIPs).One of the issues with the tool is that, for some parts of the chain occurring outside the commune, it is not easy for participants to provide accurate data.With regard to the wealth rankings, in the pilot testing undertaken in the four communes, the results indicated that there were common indicators of wealth that were usually used at the commune level to distinguish between different wealth groups (see Table 9). For example, the major indicators of wealth were landholding size, possession of farming assets, fishing assets and ownership of cattle and pigs. For the poorest wealth category, the lack of land or landlessness was an important indicator of poverty. In terms of fishing, they did not have access to more productive fishing grounds due to not owning fishing boats or appropriate fishing gear. In the first piloting, the participants divided their commune into three broad categories of wealth whereas in the subsequent three pilots, the participants divided each commune into four wealth categories in line with the more realistic scenario in these communes. Livelihood activities appeared to be in general similar in the four communes as they share a similar geographical location in terms of being adjacent to the Tonle Sap Lake.A livelihood profile was developed for the following livelihood activities in the Sya, Chamnar Krom and Samproch communes (Table 10). The tool was not used in Sna Ansar. Need to curb some local practices that contribute to the loss of the fish habitat From the gender task analysis it appears that overall livelihood tasks are fairly equally shared by both men and women, although there is a distinct gender disaggregation in some tasks. For example, in wet-season rice cultivation, while both males and females are equally engaged in sowing the seeds, they focus on different tasks (females soak seeds while males assist in broadcasting them). Providing additional observations during the gender-analysis exercise was therefore useful to distinguish between tasks. On the other hand, certain livelihood activities may be mainly done by males and other activities mainly done by females. These activities showed similarities between the different communes although the exact percentages varied somewhat by commune. For example while fish processing and storage are considered about a 90% female-linked task, in the Sya commune, the corresponding ration in Samproch is 100%. Even if both genders show an equal percentage for a particular livelihoods activity, men and women may be engaged in different tasks, e.g., rice cultivation (wet season), sowing the nursery, both males and females engaged equally (50% each), but involved in different tasks (females soak seeds and males assist in broadcasting them). Providing additional observation was therefore useful to distinguish between tasks.• Mainly male responsibility, e.g., rain-fed rice cultivation (land and dike preparation and water control; transporting Overall, it appeared that in all four communes, NTFPs are important for both subsistence use and as a source of income (usually, after processing; Table 13). Both males and females are involved in collection of NTFPs, and depending on the commune and the specific NTFP being considered there may be only one gender involved in its collection and the other in its processing. Quantifying the decline in NTFPs over the last 5 years is also an important addition to the new version. A number of conclusions can be drawn from the gross margin analyses in Sna Ansar.For example in terms of the following:• Paddy rice production -this activity appears to be more a food security than an income-generation objective. • Pig-raising -opportunity cost for female labor around the house and in the home garden is low and the flexible timing of labor inputs for pig-raising is compatible with the other tasks of women around the house. • Cage culture of catfish -this is seen as a means of \"adding value\" to the lowquality fish species caught in the Tonle Sap rather than an alternative enterprise to wild-capture fishing.In Sya the key outcomes of the gross margin analyses can be summarized as follows:• Floating rice -there does not appear to be much opportunity for value adding. However, on the input side, the high price of labor and machinery may provide an opportunity for producer groups to pool and share resources to maximize efficient use of labor and machinery. • Chicken-raising -there appears to be little opportunity for value adding at the local level. Although higher prices can be obtained in the Pursat Province markets for slaughtered and prepared chicken, the mark-up is only in the order of Riel3,000/kg, and reflects the cost of labor for slaughter and dressing. However, there may be opportunities to target production to coincide with the Chinese New Year in February, when higher prices can be obtained. • In the case of fish, there are value-adding opportunities in the form of processing, namely drying and fermenting (Partook). Here again, higher prices can be obtained in the Pursat market, but any gains are outweighed by the convenience of being able to sell to merchants at the boat-landing sites. There may be opportunities for marketing by group cooperation to bulk the highervalue fish species into sufficient quantities to attract traders for sale to Thailand and thereby benefit from the higher prices received there.In Chamnar Krom the following were the main conclusions:• For wet-season rice, if new technologies are introduced the expected yield could increase to 3.5 t/ha. • Some farmers already obtain yields of over 3.5 t/ha with improved rice varieties, good-quality seed, optimal fertilizer use and better water control. • Fishing, using cylindrical nets: it can be seen that if motorized fishing boats are used then net revenue drops to less than $12/yr However, if rowing boats are used profits can reach about $350/yr, or for a day's work, over $2. This is just a case of using a single fishing gear. In reality, fishers who use motorized fishing boats are better-off as they can access to different fishing grounds where there are more fish and they also use other fishing gears, i.e., fyke net, and enclosure net with lead fences. Once applying the gross margin analysis tool, the team decided to use the cylindrical nets as the example because this gear is common for both poor and better-off fishers as the both type of fishers can afford for the cost. Better bargaining power for negotiating with the middlemen is one possible way of increasing the prices received and subsequently the profit from fishing, as in the case of processing to increase value added.In Samproch:• Rain-fed riceFor wet-season rice, if new technologies are introduced the expected yield could increase to 4.5 t/ha. Some farmers already obtain yields of over 4.5 t/ha with improved rice varieties, good-quality seed, optimal fertilizer use and better water control.• Duck-raising is an important source of cash income for all villagers, including medium and poor families. Net returns are high in duck-raising during 3 months if the extension recommendations are followed along with materials available from MAFF's Department of Agricultural Extension in the form of TIPs.• The maximum price for ducks (Riel12,000/head) coincides with the Chinese New Year in February, and offers an opportunity for adding value. Indeed, many producers already try to maximize production at this time of year. The lowest prices (Riel8,000/kg) are in June and July.• Fishing is also a most important farm enterprise after farming and rice is an important source of cash income for all villagers, including medium and poor families. Fishing appears to be undertaken at a loss due to declining fisheries resources.For each of the communes where pilot testing of the revised CAE was conducted, market and value-chain analyses (Table 15) were conducted for the following livelihood products: • Cage culture fishing: Low-value fish are used as feed for raising higher-value fish species in floating cages in the Tonle Sap Lake. • Rattan mat-weaving: Collection is time-consuming as the wild base is depleted. Domestication of rattan to increase availability and save time; weaving timeconsuming but can be done at times of day or year where opportunity cost of women's labor is low. Formation of mat-making cooperatives/groups in the village to enhance bargaining power to get better prices. Poorer families have difficulties joining due to high membership fee and cost of shared capital.• Poultry (chicken)-raising: The production system is vulnerable to the spread of diseases. A poultry vaccination program is one way to add value while noting that poorer families are engaged in poultry-raising.• Cage culture fishing: Low-value fish are used as feed for raising higher-value fish species in floating cages in the Tonle Sap Lake. • Poultry (chicken)-raising: The production system is vulnerable to the spread of diseases. A poultry vaccination program is one way to add value while noting that poorer families are engaged in poultry-raising. • Paddy cultivation: The prices are low in the commune and the rice mills in the Pursat Province. Prices could be increased when middlemen sell in Phnom Penh, Thailand and Vietnam.• Recession rice: Gross-margin analysis and value-chain mapping exercises show that although yields are high (4 t/ha) margins are very narrow and extremely sensitive to both paddy price and input cost fluctuations, in particular the cost of contract services on which the enterprise is highly dependent. Analysis also showed that there is little or no price premium for high-quality, aromatic rice varieties, thus posing the question as to whether there is an opportunity to develop a niche market for aromatic rice to satisfy the growing domestic demand for a higher-quality product. • In regard to chicken, the maximum price received (Riel15,000/kg) coincides with the Chinese New Year in February, and offers an opportunity for adding value.The diversity of the value chain and the large number of different actors and middlemen mean that competition among traders is strong, keeping farm-gate prices fairly high. However, these characteristics also make the production system vulnerable to the spread of diseases, and losses from certain diseases are extremely high. A poultry vaccination program for these diseases would be one way of adding value to the chicken-raising enterprise. The complexity of the chain and the large number of actors would also make the system extremely vulnerable to the transfer of Avian Influenza to humans if an outbreak were to occur.• The paddy value chain showed that the price of paddy is low, for example, approximately Riel700-800/kg in the commune and Riel1,000/kg in the rice mill. The price could be increased to Riel1,200/kg when middlemen sell in Phnom Penh, Thailand and Vietnam. • Fish (both in rice fields and the Tonle Sap): The revenue from one day's labor from fishing is in the region of Riel20,000 to 30,000. This depends on the capacity of fishing per day and the price in the market. Better bargaining power for negotiating with the middlemen is one possible way of increasing the price received for the fish. Other problems affecting the fish value chain is that many small mesh nets block the watercourses and reservoirs along which fish migrate, and burning the flooded forest for hunting, grazing and other purposes has impacted fish-breeding sites. • In regard to ducks, the diversity of the value chain and the large number of different actors and middlemen mean that competition among traders is strong, keeping farm-gate prices fairly high. However, these same characteristics make the production systems extremely vulnerable to the spread of diseases. A poultry vaccination program for these diseases would be one way of adding value to the duck-raising enterprise.Improved wet-season rice varieties and production technologies to improve rice yields: Agricultural extension services use participatory training and extension (e.g., FFS), on-farm demonstrations, etc. Improved dry-season recession rice varieties to improve rice yields: For appropriate rice varieties to be used in the floodplain, agricultural extension services use participatory training and extension (e.g., FFS), on-farm demonstrations, etc. (but in Sna Ansar, it is reported that the recession rice cultivation has dropped due to irregular changes of the water regime). Cash crops, vegetable diversification: Irrigation improvement, water saving technologies, good-quality seed, post-harvest processing and marketing, appropriate extension methods. Cattle-raising: TIPs developed by DAE and systematic extension programs involving animal husbandry, health and nutrition. Chicken-raising: TIPs developed by DAE can be used for a poultry extension program.Aquaculture.Developing suitable fisheries TIPs. Improving post-harvest processing of fish products. Improving marketing networks and providing better rates for products. Sustainable fisheries management through setting up of fisheries communities and enforcement of fisheries laws and regulations (reducing the use of illegal gear). Protection of all fish habitats such as flooded forests and grassland areas (demarcation of the boundaries of flooded forests, replanting flooded forests, preservation of natural ponds, deep pools (Sna Ansar), etc.• Develop, implement and enforce the sustainable management of the major NTFPs through exploring the possibility of establishing nurseries, planting some key forest products, domesticating some NTFPs and developing sustainable harvesting systems.• Credit (high interest rate of current system): Establish community-managed revolving funds and farmer/fisher organizations (with affordable interest rates). • Market support (poor market linkages, poor-quality ungraded products):Extension workers link farmer/fisher organizations with the traders/market chain, providing business development and management skills in farmer/fisher groups, and communication channels with marketing networks.• With respect to the key questions that emerged in relation to the different livelihood activities undertaken in the commune, key differences noted between the 2008 and 2010 CAEA reports are the following:The 2010 CAEA reports give a more holistic view of all the different livelihood activities (e.g., Chamnar Krom: rice cultivation, cash crops and vegetable cultivation, cattle-raising, fisheries, NTFPs) undertaken in the commune whereas the 2008 CAEA reports a narrower focus on three categories (rice cultivation, cattle-raising and fisheries).Fisheries-related livelihoods are covered in both the 2008 and 2010 reports. The 2008 report focused on aquaculture (fish culture and hatchery). Overall, 2010 focused more on sustainable fisheries management.All AE zones were covered by key questions and 'solutions' for rice cultivation and fisheries.General issues affecting all livelihoods such as credit and marketing networks were covered in 2010 and not in 2008.• With respect to the key questions that emerged in relation to the different livelihood activities undertaken in the commune, key differences noted between 2005 and 2010 CAEA reports are the following:The 2010 CAEA report gives a more holistic view of all the different livelihood activities undertaken in the commune whereas the 2005 report gives a narrower focus. Fisheries-related livelihood activities were covered both in 2005 and 2010 but there was more emphasis in 2010 as the number of questions had increased. Overall, the 2010 report focused more on sustainable fisheries management but it does not mention much about fish culture as the 2005 report does. AE Zone 1 was not covered by overall key livelihood questions and 'solutions' in the 2005 report but in 2010 all AE zones were covered.General issues affecting all livelihoods such as credit and marketing networks were covered in the 2010 report but not in the 2005 report.Both the current research base and national policy in Cambodia clearly favor intensification of irrigated agriculture, typically without adequate consideration of water requirements to sustain fisheries and ecosystems. Through the revised CAEA, a set of suitable tools has been developed while the capacity at the local and national levels has been built to offset this policy bias. In addition, researchers and local officials involved in the revised CAEA process have identified policy implications from the local analyses to share with policy officials at the national level.• Incremental improvements were made within the existing framework.• Needs further capacity-building for effective implementation.The revised version encourages more cross-provincial departmental participation which could ensure the CAEA result would be more acceptable. The revised CAEA not only strengthens cross-departmental cooperation but also encourages better management of water for agriculture and fisheries at the commune level.Integration of the different components of the analyses in relation to land use strategies, water resources, fisheries and livelihoods takes place during the Systems Analysis phase of the CAEA process. Following RRA, the information gained from the use of the tools is organized and prepared for further analysis. Systems analysis proceeds, in plenary session, through a number of steps using the following tools:• SWOT analysis.• Analysis of system properties.• Formulation of key questions.• Innovation assessment.• Problem tree analysis.• Technology Implementation Protocols (TIPs)The SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis, allows the assessment team to systematically determine positive and negative influences on production, sustainability, stability and equity. Incorporating the SWAT analysis at this stage in the CAEA process has the advantage of developing a deeper understanding of the technical issues as they relate to land and water, environment and forestry, livelihoods, agriculture, fisheries and law and policy. This is a fairly straightforward and well-understood tool which can be applied easily to a range of contexts. Care needs to be taken in ensuring translated terms, e.g., strengths and opportunities are clearly differentiated in the Khmer language.This tool is designed to support the analysis of attributes having positive or negative effect on the system properties. It follows on directly from the SWOT analysis and employs what is termed a \"force field analysis\" on the four system properties. It provides a systematic approach to evaluating the costs and benefits to different system properties in the agroecosystem by entering the attributes of the different agroecosystem (and their effects, both positive and negative) on the system properties.The tool can help provide a better understanding of the commune, e.g., in terms of whether one agricultural system can be more or less productive, i.e., recession-rice cultivation. If it is more productive whether what they are doing is sustainable or just stable, and whether the rice field is equitably accessible by all wealth groups. This exercise can be a backstop to the scoring of each intervention activity in the Innovation Assessment Table . The analysis also allows for selecting/prioritizing one or more system properties over another.Care needs to be taken to ensure that technical terms are properly understood, and that attributes can be both positive and negative for the same property.Formulating Key Questions Key questions focus on important issues identified by the CAEA. They are generated throughout the CAEA process and tend to become increasingly focused as the analysis proceeds. The questions themselves are used to solve problems by guiding agricultural extension and development activities.The process itself can provide valuable insights into the nature of the problem and the steps necessary to address it. This part of the systems analysis delivers a more nuanced approach to problem identification and solution, and deeper analysis and perspectives on the issue. It helps in identifying what technical components are suitable to be considered appropriate solutions for particular problems. Finally, it also helps identify activities to be carried out in order to solve the problems. This then provides the basis for establishing guidelines and implementation plans.A range of elements for each development intervention are identified, e.g., the identification of the technical components of the proposed program, the extension methods and delivery mechanisms, the extension materials, potential partners, target farmer groups and AEA zones where the proposed technology will be used. Overall, it is quite a lengthy procedure and somewhat complex; however, its iterative and step-wise nature makes it an extremely useful analytical tool.This tool helped in assessing/prioritizing and modifying potential interventions derived from the key questions. It was applied through a matrix table which scored each of the interventions against seven factors (productivity, sustainability,The revised tool is used in the same way, with additional assessment on impact on gender, terrestrial environment, aquatic environment, poverty, compatibility with the Commune Development Plan (CDP), the Commune Land Use Plan (CLUP), the Strategy for Agriculture and Water (SAW) and with government policy. Improved guidance is also now included on how to apply the tool, which in sum, allows for a more holistic approach to assessment; however, it is time-consuming and requires care to ensure that subjectivity is kept to a minimum.This tool attempts to break down individual problems in the commune (identified during the CAEA) into component causes, from which potential solutions may be identified. For example, this tool is used in Chamnar Krom (2010 CAEA). In this commune, problem tree analysis is applied to the problem of poor fish-culture lot technology to break down three fisheries issues into component problems: illegal fishing, lack of technique for fish culture, and lack of fish breeding. From these components, the underlying root causes may be identified, and suggested solutions to these can be supplied in the conclusions of the report.Suggested TIPs are included in the CAEA, and TIPs related to fisheries are mentioned (i.e., TIPs on aquaculture suggested for use by the 2010 CAEA of Chamnar Krom). Inclusion of fisheries TIPs is an improvement in the revised CAEA, as the pre-PN71 CAEA for Chamnar Krom made no mention of TIPs for fisheries issues.As a result of PN71, a number of changes to the CAEA tools were made and subsequently field-tested in the four pilot CAEA exercises. Changes were of two main types. First, entirely new tools were introduced to address important water resources, fishery and livelihood issues not covered by the original CAEA tools. Second, existing tools were modified to better address key issues in a more complete or comprehensive manner.Some of the changes introduced in the early pilot CAEAs were ineffective in meeting their objectives and were dropped, others were modified over the course of the four pilots to improve their effectiveness, and some tools were used with little or no change to their original format over the entire course of the PN71 project.At the end of the testing phase an assessment was made of each individual tool to gauge its effectiveness and the benefits it provided compared to the original CAEA procedures. A summary of the results of this assessment are presented in Table 16. Overall, it was clear that the modifications to the CAEA process following the CP71 project have increased both the quantity and quality of data on fisheries and the consideration given to fisheries in these assessments, and reflect better in commune management plans the importance of fish in the food security and economic well-being of local communities.The clearest result of this project has been the unambiguous identification of (i) the large importance of fish in communes, previously overshadowed by agriculture, (ii) the many issues facing commune fisheries, including both commune-specific problems and problems shared by all four communes in the pilot study, and, most importantly, (iii) the great ecological and economic fisheries opportunities that exist in these communes.The results and analyses have clearly shown that the CPWF PN71 has significantly strengthened the manner in which livelihoods, water resources and fisheries are now addressed by CAEA. Comparisons between the new CAEA outputs and previous CAEAs conducted in the two control communes also demonstrate an emerging recognition of the importance of awareness-raising and capacity development at the community level as compared to a previous narrower focus solely on agricultural production systems.Despite the very clear benefits of the revised CAEA process, a number of important challenges still remain if the lessons learned from PN71 are to be fully capitalized and institutionalized within government planning systems. The key challenges include:1. Strengthening the links between the CAEA process, the Commune Development Planning (CDP) and the Commune Investment Planning (CIP) processes. With the decentralization and deconcentration administrative policy adopted in Cambodia, the Commune Council plays a crucial role in managing development initiatives at the local level. Thus the CAEA contributes to the local planning process in terms of contributing to the commune agriculture development plan which is a part of the CDP and/or CIP. PN71 is exploring how the revised CAEA process can best be linked to the CDPs and CIPs which in turn are discussed at an annual District Integration Workshop (DIW) where funds are provided through the government to undertake various development activities at the commune level as specified in the CDPs and CIPs. PN71 is trying to get a better understanding on how best fisheries-related issues can be appropriately taken up in this forum, through the information collected using the revised CAEA.2. Ongoing AEA development. Since it was first used in the late 1970s, AEA has undergone a number of improvements and modifications, and although PN71 has significantly upgraded the procedures, this is an adaptive learning process and hence the process should continue to evolve and refined further. The challenge now facing DAE, FiA and other AEA users is how to maintain the momentum generated by PN71 so that users can critically review AEA procedures on an ongoing basis to ensure its future evolution in the face of changing situations and new challenges.3. Trade-offs between agriculture and fisheries. The results of PN71 clearly show that, unlike land, water is usually a common, shared resource whose management can create conflicts among different users. At the same time, PN71 has successfully highlighted the importance of water as a key link between fisheries and agriculture, with both potential positive and negative trade-offs. The key challenge remaining is how to modify procedures and/or add new tools to specifically address the most important trade-offs.Although the introduction of the value-chain mapping tool helped promote a better understanding of important market chain issues, it was not particularly helpful in developing appropriate interventions to address the problems identified. The remaining challenge for follow-up work is how to convert this improved understanding into simple and relevant marketing TIPs for use by extension agents in the field.CAEA outputs under PN71 are characterized by a shift in emphasis from key questions which focus mainly on productivity and stability to key questions that more closely address sustainability and equitability. This was accompanied by less emphasis on the 'hardware' of production system improvement to a greater focus on the 'software' of community-based interventions that address community organization, capacity development and empowerment. This shift in emphasis will require the development of a different category of TIPs needed to address these usually more complex 'software' issues.6. Replicability of the results. The focus of PN71 on communes bordering the Tonle Sap, all with similar agroecosystems, means that the new tools and procedures have yet to be tested and shown to be usable across the broader range of highly divergent agroecosystem types found in Cambodia. The use of the new tools under different agroecological and socioeconomic conditions will require further adaptation and refinement, and will need to be closely supported by the experienced team of RGC officials who were involved in PN71.7. Agroecosystems analysis tool kits. Results from PN71 and experience from the broad range of other applications where agroecosystem analysis has been used indicate that AEA is not a single 'hard-and-fast' methodology, but rather makes use of a 'basket' of tools from which individual tools are selected and integrated into the most appropriate 'tool-kit' according to the specific purpose and tasks being addressed. If the adaptive potential and inherent flexibility of AEA are to be maintained, guidelines will have to be developed to assist users in assembling the most appropriate set of tools for the specific purpose in hand.8. Cross-sectoral integration. Because of AEA's focus on livelihoods, its outputs are closely linked to other commune development sectors such as education, health, environment, etc. Engaging and involving other government agencies and assimilating CAEA procedures and findings into their sectoral plans as part of a comprehensive and integrated commune development plan remains a key challenge to fully capitalize on the potential benefits of methodology. 9. CAEA for research planning. PN71 focused on the use of CAEA as a tool to identify commune-level development and extension opportunities in agriculture and fisheries. However, the results obtained include a number of key issues that need to be addressed by research rather than by extension institutions, particularly for fisheries. The challenge here will be to analyze the CAEA results obtained in the four pilot communes from a research perspective and to formulate important key research questions so that these can be articulated to relevant research institutions.10. CAEA and climate change. CAEA outputs under PN71 clearly identified a number of emerging climate-change impacts such as a changing hydrology in the annual Tonle Sap flood cycle, increased drought and flood incidence, shifts in the farming season, etc. Such impacts will have to be increasingly addressed by the commune development planning process, and the increasing recognition of the importance of climate-change, which means that CAEA must be able to adequately address these issues. Although not explicitly designed to address climate change, a number of the tool additions and modification introduced by PN71, with further refinement, have the potential to identify appropriate interventions that respond to both climate-change adaptation and mitigation.11. The cost of CAEA. The modifications introduced under PN71, although adding value to CAEA, have also added to the time and human resources required. This adds to the cost of the exercise, and has significant implications for the future adoption and use of CAEA by government, other projects and donors. CAEA will never be perfect and the remaining challenge is to find the correct balance under which the methodology produces the required results in a scientifically rigorous, but simple and affordable way.Although the above-mentioned challenges will have to be addressed over the longer term, a number of more immediate, concrete steps need to be taken to fully capitalize on the benefits and make use of the results obtained by the PN71 program.As part of PN71, the \"Commune Agroecosystems Analysis Guidance Manual\" was updated to include the new and modified tools introduced under the Project through the pilot testing in four communes as well as the mini stakeholder workshop. Moreover, the new manual was used and tested as the basis of the Training-of-Trainers (ToT) course provided to officials from the key RGC agencies. As a result of the testing, some final minor changes were made. To prepare the manual ready for wide-scale use in Cambodia it will have to be translated, printed and disseminated to all Provincial Departments of Agriculture nationwide and to other potential users in the NGO and donor communities. Clearly, the English version of the guidance manual has the potential for wider usage and it is envisaged that it can be adapted for use in other countries in the region. Ideally, the launch of the new manual should be a high-profile event in order to publicize its availability. Donor support for the printing and launch of the manual may have to be sought. AusAID (via CAVAC), as the original funder of AEA development and D&D (via UNDP), as the main users of AEA outputs are two potential sources of support. Moreover, an effort should be made to make the new manual available to other interested parties and where appropriate, provide refresher training on the new procedures.Following the publication and launch of the new manual, refresher training will have to be provided to provincial CAEA teams across the country. This will be conducted by the ToT team who were prepared for the job under PN71, supported by selected provincial staff from Pursat and Kampong Thom involved in the pilot CAEAs under PN71.Ideally, two or three ToT teams should be formed and operate independently in different provinces in order to speed up the training. These teams will have to be established and prepared, and appropriate training materials will have to be developed. The training should include some theory on the new tools but should focus mainly on hands-on training in the field while conducting an actual CAEA using the new procedures. The training will have to include the additional agencies that are involved in the new procedures rather than just the Offices of Agricultural Extension as was previously the case. Additional agencies that should participate in the training include FiA, PDWRAM and PDE.The Cambodian Agricultural Extension System includes a national Farming Systems Management Information System (FSMIS) database to support the storage, management and dissemination of CAEA and TIPs data to agricultural development stakeholders at the national and provincial levels. FSMIS software has been installed on the computers of Provincial Offices of Agricultural Extension (OAE), and AEA data are entered into the system by OAE staff. The data are used by the province for management and planning purposes, and are also transferred to DAE's national FSMIS database in Phnom Penh. The FSMIS comprises five major types of information:1. Agricultural and Socioeconomic Conditions. This database table contains CAEAgenerated data on (i) land types, (ii) topography, (iii) soil types, (iv) current land use, (v) cropping systems, (vi) crops grown, (vii) water resources, and (viii) socioeconomic indicators (family labor, landholding, off-farm work, rice self-sufficiency, number of livestock, and major income sources).2. Major Farmer Problems. This database table contains CAEA-generated information on (i) the major problems encountered, their priority and the root causes; (ii) the nature of the impact of the problems on the farming system; (iii) the farm enterprise(s) affected; (iv) the discipline(s) involved in solving the problems; and (v) the type of farmer(s) affected by the problem.3. Available Technologies (TIPs). This database table contains TIPs information on improved agricultural technologies available to solve the problems identified. The FSMIS holds all the information necessary to implement the TIPs which will thereby become available to all provincial OAEs and PDAs. 4. AEA Report Archive. This archive holds copies of all Commune AEA reports produced to date. The reports can be accessed and the information in them retrieved by the user.5. Secondary Data. This part of the database contains a range of additional statistical and spatial data sets for use by agricultural extension personnel and researchers.The FSMIS has been designed to provide a number of different functions to a wide range of users, including MAFF departments, research agencies, NGOs, donor organizations and the private sector. Various reporting formats have been developed that allow users to query the database and generate a variety of outputs according to their specific needs. Potential uses of the database include: Targeting TIPs at priority problems under relevant agricultural conditions.Locating sites with specific agroecological and socioeconomic characteristics.Locating sites where particular crops are grown.Identifying national priorities for agricultural research.Identifying market potential and private-sector opportunities.Identifying environmental impacts and key issues related to natural resources management.As a result of PN71, the database will have to be modified to create extra data fields for the storage of additional information generated by the new CAEA tools. In addition, new report formats will have to be created to allow queries in regard to the new data fields, in particular those related to water resources and fisheries. Once these upgrades to the system have been completed, the modified system will have to be reinstalled in the provincial OAE computers and, where considered appropriate, on the computers of FiA, PDWRAM, PDE and D&D.In order to enhance access to the data and information stored in the FSMIS, the database should be developed into an interactive web-based system so that any user can access the data, run queries and download information from the system. Development along these lines will require significant effort and the services of an experienced database management and ICT specialist. As such, it is likely to require donor support and may be an appropriate sub-project for funding under AusAID's CAVAC program. If additional resources can be found, FSMIS development priorities would include:1. Creating new database tables for water resources attribute data.2. Creating new database tables for fisheries attribute data.3. Creating new database tables for livelihoods asset attribute data. 4. Developing an interactive menu to allow FSMIS users to conduct their own queries and generate output reports incorporating the new data fields.5. Posting the FSMIS on a dedicated CAEA website so that users can access information in an interactive on-line environment.Results of the CAEAs conducted under PN71 identified the need for the production of several new TIPs, particularly in the fields of integrated water resources management, community fisheries management and community organization and strengthening. The required TIPs need to be commissioned by DAE, developed by the appropriate technical institution and then officially endorsed by MAFF through the existing peer-review process.Fisheries TIPs revised and reproduced under PN71 constituted one on small-scale pond fish culture produced by the Department of Aquaculture Development in collaboration with DAE in 2006. As small-scale aquaculture development was proposed by local communities in the communes surveyed, the original TIPs needed to be adapted to fit the Tonle Sap agroecosystem. It also needed to be updated, especially with regard to the process of site selection, pond digging techniques, selection of fish species and fingerling size, preparation of fish pond, management of fish pond including feed and feeding, water-quality management, and harvesting the fish which needed to consider the Tonle Sap agroecosystem. These TIPs will be given free to these and other communities in the Tonle Sap.Once fisheries concerns have been identified in the revised CAEA, TIPs should be prepared for immediate dissemination to the communes, and can be grouped under several general headings, shown in Figure 6. Note that most of these proposed TIPs currently exist only as extension materials and must be converted to the TIPs format; it is recommended that these TIPs be produced immediately, so that their utility in following CAEAs can be assessed.Figure 6. TIPs as applicable to fisheries issues thus far identified in the pilot CP71revised CAEA process. Note that the majority of TIPs must still be created from existing extension material; Of the TIPs only one has at this point been created (on \"Small-scale pond fish culture\", as indicated *** above). Adapted from Baran et al. 2010.In addition to its use by DAE for commune agricultural development planning, CAEA procedures have also been used by ADB, AusAID and Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology, Cambodia (MOWRAM) for the design and development of irrigation schemes -the Irrigation Systems Agro-Ecosystems Analysis (ISAEA) and by the German Technical Cooperation (GTZ), the World Bank and provincial authorities for planning the development of the Social Land Concession Agro-Ecosystem Analysis SLCAEA)). Many of the new tools and procedures developed under PN71 are also being adapted and used in other projects in Cambodia. For example, the Rural Livelihood Improvement Project (RULIP) funded by IFAD proposes to use the revised CAEA tools for their participatory assessments to be undertaken in the three provinces Preah Vihear, Kratie and Ratanakiri between 2009 and 2011. For the Sustainable Land Management (SLM) project funded by UNDP and MAFF some of the revised CAEA tools are proposed to be adapted to suit the objectives of their project. Therefore, enhancing and revising the CAEA methodology represent an opportunity to introduce effective changes throughout the country.Video clip on \"Management of natural fish refuge in rural community\" (in Khmer)Video clip on \"Better practice guidelines on local resource users and manager's grouples\" (in Khmer)Poster on Fish refuge pond development and management (in Khmer)Poster on integrated fish farming system (in Khmer)Booklet on small scale pond fish culture (in Khmer)TIP on \"Small-scale pond fish culture\" (in Khmer)*** Role of formal and informal credit in the fish marketing chain in Cambodia (in Khmer and English)Guidelines to improve access to microfinance by poof fishing, processing, and trading communities (in Khmer and English)Video clip on \"Our village community fisheries\" (in Khmer)Compilation on legal instruments related to community fisheries in Cambodia (in Khmer and English)Manual on fisheries co-management in Cambodia (in Khmer and English)Posters on freshwater fishes of Cambodia (parts 1, 2, 3, 4-in Khmer and English)Agroecosystems analysis procedures are used by a range of institutions in a number of Southeast Asian countries; for example, by regional universities in Of the changes listed above, which have the greatest potential to be adopted and have impact? What might the potential be on the ultimate beneficiaries? Greatest potential to be adopted: The revised CAEA methodology developed under PN71 is to be institutionalized by MAFF and used in future CAEA assessments in Cambodia.• Uptake and adoption of different tools from the revised CAEA in other projects in Cambodia. For example, the Rural Livelihood Improvement Project (RULIP) funded by IFAD proposes to use the revised CAEA tools for their participatory assessments to be undertaken in three provinces, Prah Vihear, Kratie and Ratanakiri between 2009 and 2011. For the Sustainable Land Management (SLM) project funded by UNDP and MAFF it is proposed that some of the revised CAEA tools will be adapted to suit the objectives of their project. • Upscale and adoption of the revised CAEA process developed under PN71 in neighboring countries. For example, in the Agro-Biodiversity Initiative (TABI) in Lao PDR. TABI is a long-term commitment by the Government of Lao PDR and the Swiss Development Corporation (SDC). The first phase of the project will run from May 1 2009 to April 30 2012. TABI aims to improve the livelihoods of upland farm families by the productive use and conservation of agro-biodiversity resources and hopes to adapt the revised CAEA approach in the project.For uptake of the revised CAEA to achieve its potential:• The revised CAEA guidance manual has been endorsed by the DAE of MAFF and will be used in future CAEAs conducted in Cambodia (the Khmer version of the revised CAEA guidance manual is in the process of being printed and has to be distributed to relevant provincial CAEA teams; a pool of trainers for the revised CAEA tools has been established under PN71 and may be called upon to provide training before conducting the CAEA using the new process). • For further uptake of the revised CAEA tools by other projects in Cambodia it would be useful to provide the English version of the CAEA Manual to other donors and project implementers. For example, during the CPWF Donor Visit to Cambodia in March 2010, the IFAD representative expressed interest to learn more about the CAEA tools and guidance manual. (We will follow up on this request and explore opportunities for future work using these methodologies). • For the uptake of CAEA in neighboring countries. Through the TABI project in Lao PDR, some of the revised CAEA tools have already been adapted together with the assistance of the national partner National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI), to be used for district-level land use planning and an AEA handbook prepared. Potential for future collaboration between the PN71 project implementers and the TABI team is currently being explored. In addition, for the CPWF Mekong 1 Project on Optimizing Reservoir Management for Livelihoods, several of the revised CAEA tools will be used in the livelihoods component of the Project in all three sites (i.e., in Lao PDR, Vietnam and Cambodia). (ii) Uptake of revised CAEA tools and concepts in neighboring countries.This uptake took place during the PN71 -not on project completion. Therefore, it was very quick, considering that PN71 was a short project. The main reason for this was the early endorsement and buy-in of the revised tools by the national partners (DAE) who then promoted these revised tools to other projects that they were involved in. Also having team members who were convinced of the efficacy of the revised methodologies/ concepts being involved in the TABI helped \"spread the message\" very quickly and effectively.Since this is a short, 2-year project, it is difficult to determine how the revised CAEA has contributed to the CDP and CIP process. An ex-ante evaluation should be conducted in the four communes used for the pilot study to determine in the end if the recommendations of the revised CAEA reports had any uptake within the commune planning process (CDP and CIP). This assessment is not part of the original project plan and ideally needs to be conducted if funds and additional time can be provided. used in future CAEA assessments in Cambodia and can therefore be attributed to having direct impact on a national level.• Capacity building of NARES partners in using an integrated approach to understand fisheries in agroecosystems and water management and, in particular, the participatory tools used in the revised CAEA approach. The main national partners were the DAE, the Fisheries Administration (FiA) and, in particular, one of its branches, the Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute (IFReDI), and the Department of Water Resources Management & Conservation (DWRM&C). IWMI, WorldFish and School of Oriental Studies, University of London, UK (SOAS) were the international partners working together as part of this interdisciplinary team.Future research. The CAEA operates at commune level, which is a scale that may arguably hide the needs of the most vulnerable groups in the commune in some instances. This is especially true for more precise targeting of interventions towards the poorest or landless households. In this context, it would be useful to adapt and pilot some of the revised CAEA tools to be used at the village level, to determine whether more disaggregated data on poverty variations, livelihood portfolios and the different needs of the poorest can be obtained. In fact, there has been an expression of interest from certain donors to undertake such a pilot testing of tools and methodologies that could be developed as a methodology for development interventions at the village level. This option should be explored further. Another important point to note is that the focus of PN71 was on communes bordering the Tonle Sap and that therefore the pilot testing of revised tools took place in relatively similar agroecosystems. This means that the new tools and procedures have yet to be tested and shown to be usable across the broader range of highly divergent agroecosystem types that are found in Cambodia. It is likely that the use of the new tools under different agroecological and socioeconomic conditions may require further adaptation and refinement. This is perhaps another area of research that is important to explore.Extension. As discussed earlier, the revised CAEA methodology will be utilized by the DAE when conducting future CAEA assessments. It would also be of value if other national partners engaged in PN71, utilize and adapt relevant tools from the revised CAEA when conducting their own research and projects, wherever appropriate, noting that AEA is adaptive and not a single 'hard-and-fast' method, but rather a 'basket' of tools from which individual tools are selected and integrated into the most appropriate 'tool kit' according to the specific purpose and tasks being addressed.Policy. In 2004, the CAEA was sighted as a policy instrument in MAFF for the assessment of agricultural interventions and needs at the commune level. Since the revised CAEA approach was endorsed by MAFF, it means it will be adopted in future CAEA assessments conducted by DAE and therefore it has policy-level implications. It would be useful to investigate this aspect more closely and in a rigorous manner to determine how the changes brought about by the project actually play out in practice.Institutions. How best the results of the CAEA report can be fed into the commune development plan and commune investment plan and thereafter presented at the District Integration Workshop, needs to be explored further as only a preliminary assessment of this was conducted under PN71.","tokenCount":"16340"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0165121619.json b/data/part_1/0165121619.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aee13125638c19d09a1521187283078f62c2124a --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0165121619.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"26880ba80dff037e1ccc6575135c2187","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/fb81c3d9-abd1-461e-bbd3-8ccfca3cb79b/retrieve","id":"-913147150"},"keywords":[],"sieverID":"10ff47ff-3415-400c-8650-c2e425ed6b48","pagecount":"52","content":"The Making Rangelands Secure Learning Initiative was established by a group of organisations (International Land Coalition (ILC), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), World Initiative for Sustainable Pastoralim IUCN-WISP, PROCASUR, and RECONCILE) seeking to improve security of rights to rangelands. The Initiative aims to identify and communicate good practice on making rangelands secure for local rangeland users. This is becoming increasingly challenging as diff erent actors compete for land and resources, and new pressures grow. The Initiative is working with national and local governments, development agencies, NGOs, and CSOs, together with local communities to share experiences, processes, approaches, and activities between East Africa, the Horn of Africa, and beyond. Innovative tools and processes are used for sharing information and experiences, including a Learning Route through Kenya and Tanzania hosted by local communities and organisations.Plotting progress: integrated planning in the rangelands of Kenya, Ethiopia, and UgandaFebruary 2014The Regional Learning and Advocacy Programme (REGLAP) for Vulnerable Dryland Communities is a consortium that promotes lesson learning and good practice documentation on strengthening dryland resilience in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda and advocates to governments, NGOs, and other stakeholders for improved policy and practice. The REGLAP programme has been operating since June 2008 and is funded by ECHO. It is now in its fourth phase, which will operate from January 2012 to December 2013. Regional Learning Groups focus on key issues for disaster risk reduction (DRR) in the drylands to develop good practice models and guidance and to strengthen the evidence base for the promotion of dryland resilience. These are: 1. Community-managed approaches to DRR: CMDRR, cross-border approaches, conflict-sensitive programming, participatory rangeland management (PRM); 2.Water development for DRR: developing and promoting good practice models for integrated water planning; 3. Strengthening the evidence base for DDR advocacy: analysing available research, promoting/filling research gaps to obtain clearer and shared understanding of resilience in the drylands, promoting joint messaging. Country Advocacy Groups advocate on the key constraints to resilience building for the drylands to governments and other key actors.In 2014, following a strategic review and planning exercise REGLAP changed its name to the Dryland Learning and Capacity Building Initiative (DLCI) and became an independent resource and facilitation organisation registered in Kenya.Development means growth, evolution, and progress. In a local context its meaning includes the process of improving the quality of life of the community, enhancing opportunities, and maximising choices.Drylands are areas with low rates of precipitation and high rates of evapotranspiration and which therefore experience water stress on a seasonal or constant basis. Drylands include true deserts as well as semi-arid regions, and occupy roughly 25-32% of the terrestrial area of the planet. Drylands are social, political, economic, cultural, and ecological systems.Land grabbing consists of \"acquisitions or concessions that are one or more of the following: (i) in violation of human rights, particularly the equal rights of women; (ii) not based on free, prior and informed consent of the affected land-users; (iii) not based on a thorough assessment, or are in disregard of social, economic and environmental impacts, including the way they are gendered; (iv) not based on transparent contracts that specify clear and binding commitments about activities, employment and benefits sharing, and; (v) not based on effective democratic planning, independent oversight and meaningful participation\". Source: International Land Coalition, Tirana Declaration, 2011. http://www.landcoalition.org/about-us/aom2011/tirana-declaration Integrated means to combine parts as a whole; to consider the aspects of an issue at the same time; to look at all the circumstances that might affect a project or plan in a holistic manner; and coordination of all stakeholders, sectors, and actors.Integrated land use planning is the integration of different perspectives, needs, and restrictions in land use planning. The integration can be vertical, i.e. national, regional, and local levels, and also horizontal within government organs.Land use planning is \"the systematic assessment of land and water potential, alternatives for land use and economic and social conditions in order to select and adopt the best land use options. Its purpose is to select and put into practice those land uses that will best meet the needs of the people while safeguarding resources for the future\" (FAO 2003. Participatory land use planning is an iterative process based on dialogue amongst all stakeholders. The objective of participatory land use planning is to achieve sustainable land use, i.e. a type of land use which is socially just and desirable, economically viable, environmentally sound, and culturally and technically compatible. It sets in motion social processes of decision-making and consensus building concerning the use and protection of private, communal, or public land (GTZ 1999).Planning means arranging things or projects in a structured manner with a particular outcome or vision in mind. Planning documents should indicate the way to proceed to achieve that end. Planning is a tool used by institutions to bring about change in an orderly and manageable way.Zoning involves land use restrictions enacted via an ordinance to create districts or zones that establish permitted and special land uses within those zones. Land uses in each district are commonly regulated according to such characteristics as type of use (such as residential, commercial, and industrial), density, structure height, lot size, and structure placement, among others. Land use regulations specify for each class of zone which activities are 1) permitted, 2) prohibited, or 3) permitted conditionally if a special permit is obtained. One aspect of the theory behind zoning is that by locating similar land uses together, negative externalities can be limited.Ill advised, uncoordinated, and badly planned interventions have been blamed for continuing poverty and food insecurity in rangelands. Water interventions in particular have had negative impacts. Not only have these interventions failed to improve the livelihoods of people living there, but in many cases they have served to undermine them and the environment on which they depend. Rangeland development interventions have been sectoral in their approach.Development planners have been locked into manipulating one or two key components of rangelands, such as water, without properly taking into account the interconnections between water and grasslands, as well as the wider context in which communities live.Planning for development in rangelands, including land use planning, holds particular challenges and can impose unusual constraints on routine activities. Rangeland planners must address a number of challenges: the sheer size of administrative units with sparsely distributed populations and variable, patchy resources; the independent nature of pastoral and huntergatherer cultures; high levels of environmental variability; and the complexities of managing semi-natural ecosystems. Planners must also confront the additional challenge of managing the interface between high-and low-potential areas that are functionally interdependent. On a temporal basis too, the seasonal and flexible dynamics of pastoral systems rarely fit with the more constrained and rigid administrative, government yearly cycles of planning or finances.Group rights (ownership, access, and use) of resources provide particular challenges for land use planners. Further, there have been significant changes in society that have redefined the way in which individuals interact with each other and with communities, with significant implications for the place of traditional norms and institutions in controlling access to and use of natural resources.In response to these issues and challenges, this paper draws together and reviews current and recent experience in planning processes in the rangelands of Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda. Key lessons are drawn out from two types of intervention -those led by government and those led by NGOs. These form the basis of a set of recommendations for different actors.In recent years, there has been a great improvement in the policy and legislative environment of Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda, supporting more integrated planning in rangelands. The shift from a centralised approach to a decentralised and devolved policy and legislative environment has opened up opportunities for multi-sector, multi-stakeholder, integrated planning with the participation of land users. However, there is a lack of real commitment to devolve power, including decision-making power, from central to lower government bodies as well as to community organisations. There is also a lack of financial resources and of skilled and knowledgeable personnel who understand how rangelands and the livelihoods that depend upon them function and can grow. Decision-making processes favour sedentary populations over more mobile ones.Other policies and legislation offer mixed support for rangelands and their communities. In practice many policies and pieces of legislation fall far short of fully supporting rangelands, the production systems that work there, and the communities that depend upon them. Policies give mixed and conflicting messages. A key factor in the increased vulnerability of communities living in rangelands is their lack of secure tenure and control over land use changes taking place. Pastoralism as a land use system is given little legitimacy in decisionmaking processes, hence pastoralists still tend to be excluded from decision-making over use of land and the implementation of these decisions.Government departments, aid agencies, and organisations often focus on a particular sector, with patchy and inconsistent integration and coordination. Interventions tend to take place within the boundaries of small government administrative units, which in fact cover only a minor part of the greater rangeland. Government and donors still tend to operate with a supply focus rather than according to community needs -i.e. demand. Government capacities are often limited by a lack of resources and skills.None of the three countries examined in this review has a full country-wide land use plan. The piloting of new processes, mechanisms, and activities by an NGO or development agency can reduce risks for the land user. Case studies described here have introduced new ideas, processes, and approaches. Those that have been embedded in or worked closely with government have greater opportunities for scaling up good practice than those that have not. Collaboration with research institutions and well networked development agencies can also be important in this regard.Good policies can only create the environment for community empowerment and ownership -they cannot guarantee it. Though the importance of community participation is recognised and positive steps have been taken to mainstream participatory approaches, full inclusion is often not achieved. Fair, prior and informed consent is often missing from government decisions for large infrastructure projects. Pastoralists in particular feel that their views and needs are not incorporated into planning processes. Good facilitators are hard to come by and it is difficult to engage and retain trainers. Dependency of communities has been created by too much reliance on external technology. Regular dialogue and consensus building is vital for community mobilisation. For an action of the magnitude that many planning processes are to succeed, the issue in question must be salient, credible, and legitimate in the eyes of community members .Where community participation is a priority, women have taken an active role in the land use and development planning processes described in this paper. However, the more complex gender issues (the balance of power, access to information and education, and control of resources) tend to be sidelined or added on as an afterthought. Women need an incentive in order to be willing to actively participate in meetings or activities -and often this is missing.Changes in society such as more educated youth, exposure to different lifestyles, and more individualised values have redefined the way in which people interact with each other and with communities, with significant implications for the place of traditional norms and institutions in controlling access to and use of natural resources. Increasingly, customary institutions are left with little power, while those that have power have no presence on the ground. Attempts have been made to fill this governance and management vacuum, with varying degrees of success.Hybrid governance structures incorporating both government and community institutions may be appropriate but require significant support, including capacity building.Planning at a large scale is challenging. Programmes such as river basin development have often been over-ambitious and inflexible and have tried to adopt a blueprint approach, resulting in limited success. Interventions that provide opportunities for reflection, feedback, and adaptations are better positioned to cope with new challenges and problems (identified and solved in a participatory manner), and therefore are more likely to be sustainable in the long term. Planning is not an event but a process to be invested in.The majority of rangelands have a major comparative advantage over other land types in terms of land use systems, including livestock, tourism, and renewable energy. They are strategically located as the bridgehead to new markets beyond country borders. Increasingly, large infrastructural investments are being established in these areas, including the Lamu Port and Lamu Southern Sudan-Ethiopia Transport Corridor (LAPSSET) and related developments.However, if the opportunities created by these investments are to be fully realised, their planning needs to fully account for and incorporate linkages to and likely impacts on the wider drylands area and the communities living there.From central government to local, there are new opportunities for more integrated planning and implementation that respond to the unique constraints and attributes of rangelands and particularly mobile pastoralism, and that can be sustained in the longer term. New bodies focused on drylands and arid and semi-arid lands (ASAL), along with knowledge sharing and discussion platforms, provide opportunities for more appropriate support for livestock production systems.As a result of stronger devolution processes, mid-level layers of government will find it difficult to avoid land use planning and/or ignore existing land use plans in the future. Land security is an important aspect supporting investments in land and related decision-making processes. Across Kenya, Uganda, and Ethiopia, opportunities exist for strengthening land tenure in rangelands, and resources and support are available for this. All three countries have recognised the need for a country-wide land use plan and are taking steps to produce plans at national and other levels. This requires significant support from development actors.Aid activities and support in drylands are moving from majority humanitarian-or food securityfocused responses to ones based on longer-term development. The new (for many) focus on \"resilience building\" provides a rationale and opportunity for supporting and incorporating systems-based and non-linear approaches to development that are better suited to rangelands than simple, linear, cause-and-effect approaches. The focus on \"resilience\" has provided opportunities for natural science to be brought back into the development narrative. The commitment of all three countries to the IGAD Drought Disaster Resilience and Sustainability Initiative (IDDRSI) process, which has resilience building at its core, and the production of country programme papers to end drought emergencies are reflections of this.New approaches to planning and in particular those that work with both government and communities to plan beyond small administrative boundaries, such as river basin planning, watershed management, ecosystem management, and participatory rangeland management (PRM), are providing increasing evidence that planning at scale has benefits. However, planning at scale should not result in a disconnect between decision-makers and land users -the two need to work together for positive results.Both governments and NGOs are seeking to build capacity for planning at different levels.There are increasing opportunities for investments from the private sector (e.g. commercial investors, water service delivery companies) or through carbon offsetting, and from donors (including the Global Alliance supporting the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD)'s DDRSI process). Rewards (financial or non-financial) for environmental services and for voluntary and regulatory arrangements are also a relatively new source of funding, while also supporting a change in behaviour towards sustainable and adapted management of these ecosystems. The development of contingency funds for drought (and, for example, crisis modifiers) provides an opportunity for readily available funds that can be mobilised for effective quick response to crises such as droughts. This is a good example of how funds can be devolved to local authorities to better respond to local situations and needs.NGOs today are better placed and committed to planning and working together than they have been in the past. Some donors have encouraged this through calls for collaborative projects. However, beyond these projects much can be done to improve joint planning, sharing of and more efficient use of resources, and harmonisation of approaches. Experience in the region has shown the value of conservation and research organisations, working with development organisations. With more decision-making power at lower levels, there should be greater opportunity for coordination -however, where it is necessary to work across lower-level administrative boundaries, coordination bodies will be required to manage this.In rangelands there is a much stronger case for governance structures to cut across administrative boundaries in order to reflect the reality of resource use and mobility. In this case a \"nested\" governance structure can hold more relevance with governing institutions in place and functioning for each different layer or unit of resource use (as the structure decreases in size of numbers of uses and area, from a landscape or rangeland to a well or tree). In a well functioning rangeland society there will be structures set up to govern these different resource units, and it is these units and their structures that traditionally form the basis of rangelands planning. As such, they should also form the basis of more formalised planning processes.For sustainable development Global commitment to integrated development planning and decision-making was reconfirmed at the Rio+20 Summit in June 2012 and as part of the document \"The Future We Want\". 1 This affirmed the belief that sustainable development can only be achieved through the integration of economic, social, and ecological systems as interdependent but open entities that continuously interact and influence one other. In the quest to achieve national development goals, including the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), there is increasing recognition that this can happen only when the goals are translated into actions at the sub-national level and through the active participation of local actors.This in turn has brought about renewed attention to planning for local development. With sustainable development in mind, planning methodologies have been adopted as the means through which states should intervene to address imbalances of power and market failure in order to ensure democratic, well informed, and rational decision-making in the pursuit of economic, social, and ecological goals. The participation of local populations has been increasingly promoted, and to some extent this has been reflected in national development planning processes. The development of Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) is an example where community consultations (albeit limited) have taken place at the beginning of the process.With specific attention to drylands, the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) emphasises the importance of participatory integrated development plans and the integration of strategies for poverty eradication into efforts to combat desertification and the effects of drought. 2 Here the balance between conservation and management of natural resources and the promotion of economic and social stability of local (indigenous and other) peoples is promoted. This parallels the growing scholarly literature emphasising the interconnectedness of environmental sustainability and socio-economic equity and justice (Orenstein et al. 2011). All of these developments have provided an increasing number of reasons for getting planning in drylands (in particular) right.Poor planning in the past Ill advised, uncoordinated, and badly planned interventions have contributed to the continuing poverty and food insecurity in dryland areas and, more specifically, in rangelands.Water interventions in particular have had negative impacts. The prolific development of water points (e.g. in northern Kenya or eastern Ethiopia) by NGOs, development agencies, and governments has contributed to sedentarisation and privatisation of resources, resulting in conflicts between land users, environmental degradation, and increased vulnerability and poverty for many (Gomes 2006). In Wajir district in Kenya, for example, in the 1940s there were four major dry season water points managed communally; today there are over 75 -many managed by non-customary groups who charge for use. Somali pastoralists claim they have lost 75% of the most palatable pastures as a result of the proliferation of mechanised boreholes. Similar experiences are found in parts of Uganda (Powell 2010). Not only have these interventions failed to improve the livelihoods of people living there, but in many cases they have served to destroy them and the environment on which they depend.Rangeland development interventions have been sectoral in their approach. For example, the large rangeland development schemes established in Ethiopia 3 in the 1970s failed to meet their objectives because \"planning\" was undertaken with a lack of understanding of the pastoral production system, and imposed technology-based solutions. There was a failure to incorporate indigenous knowledge, practices, goals, and strategies of pastoral communities, who were not included in the planning process (Zerfu et al. 2010;Homan et al. 2004).properly taking into account the interconnections between the different components of rangelands and the wider context in which rangeland communities live. Planning has taken place within the boundaries of small government administrative units, which in fact cover only a minor part of the greater rangeland. Across the majority of rangelands, government and donors still operate with a supply focus rather than according to the needs of communities -i.e. demand. Interventionist strategies (e.g. rigid stocking quotas) have consistently failed to deliver improvements to the environmental condition and the livelihoods of the people who depend on it (Laris 2002). Government and local elites can appropriate and influence these processes for their own ends (Gomes 2006).Planning for development in rangelands, including land use planning, holds some particular challenges and can impose unusual constraints on routine administrative activities. The overall per hectare productivity of East African arid and semi-arid (ASAL) rangelands is generally low, so the cost of their management must be as well. Despite a modest revenue base, rangeland administration must address a number of other challenges -the sheer size of administrative units, with sparsely distributed populations and variable, patchy resources; the independent nature of pastoral and hunter-gatherer cultures; the high levels of environmental variability; and the complexities of managing semi-natural ecosystems.Planners must also confront the additional challenge of managing the interface between high-and low-potential areas that are functionally interdependent. Across East Africa, the loss of pastoral access and the alienation of this land to other uses is a widespread occurrence. More and more, these landscapes are becoming fragmented, dissected into a patchwork of agricultural and pastoral land uses (Flintan 2011). The economic performance of pastoralism, its capacity to support human populations and to ride out droughts, depends on continued access to key assets, especially river valley lands (Galvin et al. 2008).On a temporal basis too, the seasonal and/or flexible dynamics of pastoral systems rarely fit with the more constrained and rigid administrative, government yearly cycles of planning, finances, and so on. System component interactions contribute to a dryland system that is difficult to predict and inappropriate to generalise about. Dryland farming is a highly risky enterprise. Pastoralism is a land use system more suited to drylands: it considers ecological, social, and economic systems, and is practised in an integrative way (Flintan et al. 2013).Group rights (ownership, access, and/or use) of resources provide particular challenges for development planners. As a result, governments try to individualise these rights or ignore them (hoping that if they do this for long enough they will break down and disappear).Trends show that, in many communities, what were previously group rights are breaking down and becoming more individualised. Further, there have been significant changes in society that redefine the way in which individuals interact with one other and with communities, with significant implications for the place of traditional norms and institutions in controlling access to and use of natural resources. Where land and resource tenure is unclear, poor land use has increased (Gomes 2006).Migration into drylands by non-locals, as well as out-migration by youth in particular, are also becoming more common. The introduction of modern or statutory frameworks for governance at local levels has further undermined the effectiveness of traditional institutions. This has created a situation where traditional institutions still exist on the ground but have little power, while those institutions that have power have no presence on the ground. It is this reality that creates the open access problem with regards to natural resources, which are then exploited without any regulation, leading to degradation and decline (Odhiambo 2012).In response to these issues and challenges, this paper draws together and reviews current and recent experience in planning processes in the rangelands of Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda. Some \"good practice\" examples are provided -these focus firstly on government-led processes (Section 2) and secondly on NGO-led processes (Section 3). Key lessons from these examples are drawn out, including strengths and weaknesses, in Section 4. Opportunities and principles for future interventions and support are highlighted and provide the basis for a set of recommendations.This document is a shorter version of Plotting Progress: Development Planning in the Drylands of Kenya, Ethiopia and Uganda (Flintan 2013). Available at: http://www.disasterriskreduction. net/fileadmin/user_upload/drought/docs/Plotting%20progress_Flintan_2013_FINAL.pdf Experiences shared and lessons learned: government-led InitiativesThe policy and legislative environments of Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda supporting more integrated planning in drylands, and more specifically rangelands, have improved greatly in recent years. The shift from a centralised approach to a decentralised and then a devolved policy and legislative environment has opened up opportunities for multi-sector, multistakeholder, integrated planning with the participation of land users. In Ethiopia, the woreda (district) is seen to be the centre of socio-economic development, providing opportunities to tackle poverty at the grassroots level. As a result of the 2010 Constitution in Kenya, local governance systems are being realigned, empowering county-level elected government to define and implement local development priorities. In Uganda, the responsibility for local planning, budgeting, and implementation lies primarily with the district/municipality and sub-county/town council level of government. However, despite these structures, there is a lack of real commitment to devolve power, including decision-making power, from central to regional and lower-level government bodies, as well as a lack of financial resources and of skilled and knowledgeable personnel who understand how drylands and the livelihoods that depend upon them function and can grow. There is also the danger that more powerful individuals at the local level will take up new opportunities for participation in decision-making processes, while those who have less power or accessibility to decision-making bodies will miss out. In rangelands this situation favours sedentary populations over more mobile ones.Other policies and legislation offer mixed support for drylands and their communities. Though the principles for integrated planning are supported -participation of communities (land users) and other stakeholders, rights to information and knowledge, rights not to be removed from one's land without compensation, equitable development -their implementation falls far short of supporting drylands, the production systems that work there, and the communities that depend upon them. Policies also give mixed and conflicting messages.Though good sector-focused policies, legislation, and development strategies exist, such as for agriculture, few specifically tackle the needs and challenges of drylands. As a result, interventions are often inappropriate for the unpredictable, variable, and often harsh dryland environments and the populations whose livelihoods depend upon them. Interventions focus on one component of drylands at a time, such as water, and fail to incorporate or account for the inter-related nature of all components or to plan at a scale that reflects this interconnectedness. Governments, aid agencies, and organisations are often sector-based, with patchy and inconsistent integration and coordinationThe establishment of the Ministry of State for Development of Northern Kenya and Other Arid Lands (MDNKOAL) in 2008 provided the opportunity for a geographically focused, multisectoral, and integrated approach to development in Kenya's ASALs. Following elections in March 2013, the structure of the government has changed and the MDNKOAL has been disbanded. However, in view of these likely changes, in 2010 the ASAL Secretariat was established by the Ministry as a permanent and specialised institution that will champion and coordinate development in the ASALs in the long term -as anticipated it will take on the majority of the MDNKOAL's roles and responsibilities.In Ethiopia, the establishment of the Directorate for Equitable Development in Emerging Regions 4 in the Ministry of Federal Affairs (MOFA) has been an example of the recognition by government that pastoral regions require a targeted and different approach from development in highland areas: it is also the federal organisation responsible for a large programme of resettlement of pastoralists. Earlier this year a State Minister of Livestock was appointed in the Ministry of Agriculture to lead livestock development in the country; this highlights the value assigned to livestock in Ethiopia's future economy by the national government.In Uganda, a Rangeland Policy and a Pastoral Code have been in draft for several yearscurrently both are under review. Platforms such as the Karamoja National Working Group (KNWG), which sits in the Office of the Prime Minister, provide opportunities for coordination between different ministries, key development partners, the private sector, and CSOs.Key factors in the increased vulnerability of communities living in rangelands are their lack of security of tenure and lack of control over land use changes that are taking place. There remains little recognition of the benefits and opportunities of pastoral-based livelihoods despite increasing evidence, and in particular in the face of climate change. Where land administration and land use laws exist, they have been crafted with mainly sedentary highland farming areas in mind; hence they have only limited applicability to pastoral areas, which are predominantly characterised by communal land tenure systems (group rights). The lack of legitimacy given to pastoralism as a land use system means that pastoralists tend to be excluded from the design and planning of land-related decisions, plans, and their implementation.None of the three countries examined in this review has a full country-wide land use plan. The existing institutional framework and manpower at all government levels is not yet commensurate with the task of undertaking land use planning at this scale. Some land use planning is being carried out in certain areas (see for example Box 1), but in most cases decisions about land use and development are carried out in a piecemeal fashion focusing on relatively small units of land and resources. \"Enclave development\" occurs where highproductivity areas close to rivers are removed from the pastoral system by governments and made available to investors 5 (Behnke and Kerven 2013). This tends to occur without assessing the appropriateness of the intervention in relation to the environment and resource distribution of the area. Similarities between some recently developed rangeland development projects and failed rangeland development projects of the 1970s are of concern.Box 1: Land use planning and water development in Borana zone, Oromia Region, EthiopiaBased on the principle of a \"Land Use Guided Development Corridor Approach for Sustainable Development\" (see National Regional State of Oromia 2010), Oromia region is at the forefront of planning at a regional level. 6 The Oromia Bureau of Land and Environment is preparing a regional master land use plan (at a scale of 1:50,000) which covers 45% of the region's total area, with fieldwork carried out by the Oromia Water Works Design and Supervision Enterprise (OWWDSE), a public enterprise (ESCNCC 2011). Large parts of Borana zone are already covered by the plan: in order to generate information for this, a detailed land use planning (LUP) study commenced five years ago. There are three main sub-basins of Borana zone, which form the basis of the planning: the Rift Valley-Lakes, the Dawa, and Laga Sure-Laga Wata (the latter two areas containing significant numbers of pastoralists). Based on detailed studies of local ecology, hydrology, socio-economics, etc., land use suitability has been identified for livestock and agriculture. In Laga Sure-Laga Wata, for example, 85% of the basin has been identified as being suitable for livestock production (with some areas requiring rehabilitation of grasslands including bush clearing), and only 9% suitable for agriculture (see study report and Proposed Land Use Plan for the basin -OWWDSE 2010). Different stakeholders were consulted in the development of the land use plan; however, it is not clear who these were and how they were involved.The plans are used as the basis for spatial/area \"integrated land use planning projects\". In southern Oromia there are two such projects under way, in Borana and Genale Dawa. In Borana, a water supply project has been developed across the zone, which will provide water for both domestic and livestock uses. Based on MDG goals, water should be available within a 3km round trip in rural areas. Supply of water for livestock will be based on the calculation that cattle (with sheep) require 4 hectares (ha) of land and 15 litres of water per capita per day (l/c/d), and should not be more than 5km from a water point. Camels (with goats) require 6 ha of land and 20 l/c/d and should not be more than 7.5km from a water point.Figure 1 shows the plans for the whole zone, including the supply network (circles depict the radius serviced by each well according to the above calculations). The initial design was for 2,000km of pipeline, but it is now anticipated that 3,727km of piping will be put down and 5 Such as the Awash River Basin, Afar region (with up to 172,448 ha already under development) and the Omo River Basin, SNNPR, both in Ethiopia. Large government schemes are also found in these areas, including the Fentale Irrigation Development project on the Awash, and the 245,000 ha South Omo sugar plantations, linked to the development of the Gibe III Dam. Some of these developments, and particularly those implemented by the State, do make some provisions for local communities, such as resettlement and outgrower schemes.6 Other regions are in the early stages of developing land use plans. For example, in the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples Region (SNNPR), Ethiopia, the Environmental Protection, Land Administration and Use Authority is preparing LUP manuals. However, because of finance and manpower shortages, little activity is taking place. reservoirs and water points established. The pipeline is partially operational but is lacking proper arrangements for management (Alemayehu 2012). To date, 277km of pipe has been laid. Little if any community consultation was carried out in project planning. It is anticipated that NGOs will provide support for establishing community management structures and for network operation and maintenance (Mesele 2010). Based on the new supply network, rangeland development projects are being piloted -for example, the Dembel-Ayisha Dewelle water supply and rangeland development project for sheep farming (see Figure 7). The Water Act prescribes Catchment Management Strategies as the tool for the use and management of water resources, and requires that they should be developed for each of the major river basins in Kenya -with overall responsibility held by the Water Resource Management Authority (WRMA). Regional offices of the WRMA are being set up based on catchments -there is one in Nanyuki to serve the whole of northern Kenya. Implementation of integrated water resource management (IWRM) at catchment level is achieved through the establishment of Catchment Area Advisory Committees (CAACs). Sub-regional offices are being established to manage sub-catchments. At the grassroots level, stakeholders engage through Water Resource Users Associations (WRUAs), which also provide a forum for cooperative management of water resources and conflict resolution. This provides the opportunity for hydrological boundaries to be used as the boundary for decision-making, rather than administrative boundaries.Six River Basin Development Authorities (RBDAs) have been created under the Ministry of Regional Development Authorities (MORDA). These include the Tana and Athi River Basin Development Authority (TARDA) (which covers 138,000 sq km), the Ewaso Ng'iro North River Basin Development Authority 7 (ENNDA) (209,576 sq km), and the Ewaso Ng'iro South River Basin Development Authority (ENSDA) (47,000 sq km), all of which include substantial areas of drylands.In an attempt to improve regional development coordination, the six RBDAs have been shifted to various ministries depending on their major projects at the time; for example, at one time TARDA was under the Ministry of Energy while ENNDA and ENSDA were under the Ministry of Agriculture (and Rural Development). There has been a lack of coordination between the Ministry and the RBDAs and a lack of planners and development managers trained in requisite skills in regional policy analysis, regional planning methodology, and implementation and monitoring, 7 ENNDA, for example, encompasses 28 administrative districts: Moyale, Chalbi, Marsabit, Laisamis, Isiolo, Garbatulla, Wajir East, Wajir West, Wajir South, Wajir North, Garissa, Fafi, Ladgera, Mandera East, Mandera West, Mandera Central, Samburu East, Samburu Central, Samburu West, Laikipia East, Laikipia North, Laikipia West, Meru Central, Imenti North, Tigania, Igembe, Nyandarua North, and Nyeri North.Reconciling different land uses such as agriculture and pastoralism is difficult and requires a multi-sectoral approach which has affected the preparation of regional plans. 8 Limited resources and the absence of a policy framework have been further challenges (Orege undated). There are also other conflicting roles and responsibilities. The Physical Planning Department (PPD) of the Ministry of Lands is charged with responsibility for preparing Regional Physical Development Plans (RPDPs) under the Physical Planning Act (PPA) 1996. Under the Act, the PPD is legally bound to prepare an integrated regional development plan for areas such as Ewaso Ng'iro North River Basin, without collaboration or structured partnership with ENNDA. However, according to ENNDA Act Cap 448 (1989), ENNDA is responsible for planning and management in the Basin, to ensure proper utilisation of natural resource and environmental protection (ENNDA undated).The mandate of the RBDAs 9 is to formulate integrated multi-sectoral development within their areas of jurisdiction through implementation of integrated programmes and projects such as provision of hydropower, flood control, and water supply for irrigation, domestic, and industrial use, together with environmental conservation, as well as to contribute to the formulation and implementation of integrated regional plans and to MORDA's strategic plan.Neighbouring RBDAs are also expected to harmonise their plans and to produce them in consultation with other stakeholders. In addition, RBDAs are expected to collect, store, and share information, establish mechanisms for empowering local communities to participate in development activities, and share benefits equitably between them. For example, the strategic plan of ENSDA (2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012) includes, amongst other things, the Ewaso Ng'iro South Integrated Regional Development Plan (IRDP) project to guide and coordinate development interventions in the region; a community drought preparedness project; the establishment of the ENSDA Regional Data Centre; a conflict mitigation and management project for Mara community natural resources; institutional capacity development; regional coordination and monitoring and evaluation (M&E); and the Lower Ewasa Ng'iro South multi-purpose project \"to transform the arid lands to vibrant economic use\". It is anticipated that the money to fund these projects will come from the Government of Kenya (GOK) and donors (ENSDA 2008).Programmes such as the Medium Term ASAL Programme (MTAP), developed by the MNKDOAL, seek to improve coordination and the participation of communities. WRUA development cycles will be adapted for ASAL areas and implemented in 18 sub-catchments in the six priority counties, leading to improved water delivery. The Water Service Trust Fund (WSTF) is a multi-donor basket fund for water catchment strategies (Halakhe 2012;MTAP 2012).In is commissioning the preparation of Master Plans for the 12 major river basins, most of which have now been completed. The River Basin Master Plans are supposed to be used by different federal and regional government ministries and agencies as a base on which to integrate their own strategic plans. However, some regional governments are carrying out their own plans. As detailed in Box 1 Oromia government is in the process of preparing integrated land use plans for various site-specific purposes where the planning sites are within a river basin, as part of a region-wide land use plan but separately from the River Basin Master Plan.This magnifies the problem of coordination and cooperation among different government ministries and agencies (ECSNCC 2010).The Fentale Irrigation Scheme was a pilot for the development of later schemes and progammes.It is now held up by the government as a flagship for good development. The scheme has led to the resettlement of 4,500 Kereyu pastoralist households (out of an anticipated 22,000), and will cost an estimated ETB 467 million. The Oromia Water Works Design and Supervision Enterprise (OWWSDE) was contracted to develop the scheme. Irrigated agriculture is being introduced across 16,000 ha of the 18,000 ha project area, though to date only 25% has been developed. A scoping mission to the area in January 2012 suggested that, although access to water has been improved, communities have received little training in crop production and fear that the 0.75 ha allocated to each household will not be enough for future use. Water users' associations have been established but are not strong and do not function properly; project staff are limited by lack of resources in terms of transport and skills; there is little feeling of \"ownership\" over the scheme and in some cases water pipes have been stolen; and there is a lack of potable water and health clinics for settlement areas. Uncontrolled use of irrigation is likely to result in problems of salinity in five years or so. Most households still keep livestock, but the promised grazing close to home has not materialised. Information to support decision-making is collected through evaluation of groundwater potential and the region's land potential. A land use planning study will take place, together with an integrated approach that will incr ease focus on issues such as dealing with invasive species, natural resource management (NRM), improving livestock production, and marketing. The programme has already settled communities voluntarily on tens of thousands of hectares in riverine areas along the Wabi Shebele, Genale, Dawa, and Web Rivers. Regional coordination offices are being established to manage the projects on the ground. Capacity building of woreda and regional government staff on planning and matters such as drilling supervision, and awareness creation on the usefulness of integrated basin development, are being carried out (Bantero 2012).SLM is a priority for Uganda and the government with partners, is in the process of developing a country-wide programme. This will be aligned with the investment plans of the agriculture and environmental sectors. The process was initiated in 2006 with a national workshop on SLM in order to develop stronger partnerships, increase resource mobilisation, transfer appropriate technology, and promote inter-sectoral coordination, integrated approaches, and cost-effective SLM is also a priority for Ethiopia, as most recently defined in the Ethiopia Strategic Investment Framework (ESIF) for Sustainable Land Management (2008). The ESIF-SLM sets key priorities for SLM-related investments, improving the policy, legal, institutional, and financial environments, and defines a strategy for scaling up SLM best practices and the approach and mechanisms for coordination, consultation, participation, and M&E. It aims to address the interlinked problems of poverty, vulnerability, and land degradation at the rural community level. The ESIF-SLM states (p.39) that \"narrow sector based projects have limited success in addressing the multi-dimensional problem of land degradation. Hence the need is for a comprehensive and integrated approach involving public and private partnerships between different sectoral agencies and other stakeholders\" (FDRE-MOA 2011). The ESIF-SLM is one of the first government initiatives in Ethiopia to recognise land degradation as \"a multi-dimensional problem, which the piecemeal efforts of different agencies in the past failed to tackle\" (ibid).The SLM implementing committees are organised at federal, regional, woreda, and community levels. The total project cost of SLM, including contingencies, is USD 37.79 million, of which a loan from the International Development Association (IDA) accounts for USD 20 million, the GEF USD 9 million, and the Government of Ethiopia (GOE) USD 8.79 million. To avoid duplication and to promote synergies, an SLM platform has been established to coordinate all SLM investments in Ethiopia. This mechanism comprises a national inter-agency steering committee chaired by the State Minister of the MOA (the Natural Resource Management Sector, or NRMS); a national technical committee that comprises representatives of government, civil society, and development agencies; and an SLM Support Unit in the MOA to provide administrative and technical support to the steering committee and the technical committee.Similar SLM platforms are replicated at regional level. Following the successes of watershed planning and management to date (see Flintan 2013), the SLM Support Unit is leading the implementation of the approach across 35 watersheds in (though not exclusive to) highland areas. 10 The selected watersheds are a sub-set of a much larger plan of the MOA to support SLM activities in 177 priority watersheds across the country. The project has significant capacity-building components for communities and local government (for more details, see FDRE-MOA 2011).10 These watersheds, each with an average size of about 10,000 ha, comprise 15-20 sub-watersheds. The project is expected to cover a total area of about 605,271 ha, benefiting around 1 million people (with funding from the World Bank/GEF, Germany's Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW), and the Finnish government).The piloting of new processes, mechanisms, and activities by an NGO or development agency can reduce risks for the land user. This is of particular value where the risk is large. Several of the case studies here have introduced new ideas, processes, and approaches -and those that have been embedded in and/or worked closely with government have been particularly successful in scaling up good practice. Collaboration with research institutions and well networked development agencies can be important in this regard. A major constraint for planning is a lack of information and poorly developed information sharing systems.Communities in particular do not have access to information related to land use change or development planning.Here, two initiatives with potential for sustainable scaling-up are highlighted. Other examples are found in the larger document on which this issue paper is based (Flintan 2013).Land Use Master Plan in Kitengela, Kenya Since 1998 the African Wildlife Foundation (AWF) has used conservation enterprises 11 as one among several strategic interventions for conserving wildlife to ensure that positive conservation and livelihood outcomes result at the landscape level. In general these activities take place on community land, where there is also a high conservation value. Commonly, land use plans have been developed to zone the community land into different areas of interest and use, and these have proved relatively successful in their implementation. However, in Kitengela, south of Nairobi, a much larger land use plan was produced in collaboration with the District Council, which has proved to be the first community-led land use plan approved by the GOK. RANGELANDS allowed for greater understanding of resource, zoning, and planning issues that affect Maasai pastoralists. Dialogue facilitated by this project led to agreement that a comprehensive and holistic LUP process that sought to protect and facilitate co-existence between the area's livestock and wildlife was required. This developed into a programme, headed by AWF and funded by USAID, to develop a Land Use Master Plan (LUMP) for the Kitengela (Kaputiei) area.The process of producing the plan is described in detail in Fitzgerald and Nkedianye In addition, the process had the support of a number of different individuals, organisations, and donors who were committed to seeing it through to the end. A Land Forum was established to coordinate this. The organisations involved provided different and complementary skills. These \"outside\" interest groups shared the vision of the local communities -halting fragmentation of land and a better securing of rights. Those organisations involved that were research-oriented, such as ILRI, saw the process as \"a 'continual engagement model' creating 'research-action arenas' in order to better integrate knowledge from policy makers, communities and researchers … [and] the creation of a core boundary-spanning team, including community facilitators, a policy facilitator, and trans-disciplinary researchers, responsible for linking with a wide range of actors from local to global scales… This model focused on the creation of hybrid scientific-local knowledge highly relevant to community and policy maker needs\" (Reid et al. 2009).The LUMP was prepared within the legal framework of the Physical Planning Act Cap. 286, which empowers local authorities to control, guide, and prohibit developments, while recognising individual stakeholders and community participation in spatial plan-making processes. The LUMP includes a zonation plan for the region. This limits sub-divisions in the various zones and outlines the permitted expansion zones for urban areas, to stop the increasing encroachment of human settlement on prime agricultural and pasture areas and reduces fragmentation risks. The LUMP designates areas for livestock and wildlife as well as for urban development, and includes restrictions on various land uses in each zone. It balances different land uses and demonstrates that wildlife, pastoralism, and development can co-exist by means of a coordinated plan.Participation in this process gave pastoralists and other land users increased awareness on land matters and greater strength in and power over decision-making processes. Radio broadcasts in Maa were used to ensure that everyone, including community members who were illiterate, understood the planned LUMP and participated in discussions. By March 2010 an estimated 2,500 households had been reached through 13 radio programmes. AWF also provided capacity support to local landowner associations in land management, governance, and financial management.After considerable pressure from the community and the KPF through lobbying, letter writing, and personal meetings, in June 2010 the Olkejuado CC adopted the LUMP. This made it the first community-initiated land use plan to be approved by the Kenyan government (the Ministry of Lands) and the first local land use plan for wildlife conservation areas in Kenya.The implementation of the LUMP, as per Kenya's planning laws, needs to be led by the local authority, in this case the CC of Olkejuado. The council's lack of participation in the development and launch of the LUMP, however, suggests a lack of interest and ability to implement the plan.One of the key challenges is oversight over a broad geographical area. Sub-division and land sales are happening at a pace that is difficult for local authorities to keep track of. There are Urban sprawl and the expanding industrial zone in the Kitengela area conflicts with livestock production in the area also a number of parcels of land with \"unknown\" owners, making any regulation of land use extremely difficult. The land control boards play a critical role in supporting land use plans as these bodies review and approve sub-division. The Isinya Land Board has requested that the LUMP's spatial maps be used for the approval or rejection of requested sub-divisions.Planning needs to be built on trusted and broad community representation if it is to receive general acceptance. The employment of staff from the local area helped the process to succeed: they better understood and steered it through the asymmetries of power at the local level. The communities across the project area were engaged throughout the process. The varied layers of community groups, landowner associations, and the Land Forum present a workable model that will help other regions to ensure community awareness. Tools such as radio programmes are cost-effective ways of reaching the community (Fitzgerald and Nkedianye forthcoming).The adoption of the LUMP (see Figure 4) comes at a time when Kenya is undergoing structural revisions because of a new Constitution and new policies. Though these revisions strengthen the rationale for and role of land use plans as part of the devolution process, it is not clear exactly how the new structures will influence implementation. 12 Pastoral communities have weak security of access to resources and land in Ethiopia, with no formal land tenure system defined for the majority of pastoral areas (Afar region being the exception). In an effort to offer a model for better securing of rights to resources, Save the Children USA developed a participatory rangeland management (PRM) approach (Flintan and Cullis 2010) drawing from and building on the well accepted participatory forest management (PFM) approach now being mainstreamed throughout the country.PRM is made up of three key stages (see Figure 5). An appropriate unit for rangeland management (such as a traditional grazing area) is defined with the community and other stakeholders. Rangeland resources are identified and an appropriate community association or institution is strengthened or set up. A rangeland management plan is developed based on an in-depth rangeland inventory and community action planning. Access to resources is made more secure through the drawing up of a legally binding rangeland management agreement between the community and local government, with rules and regulations (bylaws) defined, based on the rangeland management plan.Participatory rangeland management provides opportunities for rangeland users to be part of planning processes Currently PRM is being piloted in Bale zone, Oromia region by FARM Africa and SOS Sahel Ethiopia.The pilot kebele have been divided into blocks encompassing at least 80 households of between 6,000 ha and 22,000 ha per block depending on population density, the terrain and resources found there. These blocks form the starting point for data collection (rangeland inventory) and establishing management. The project aims to support the development of rangeland management agreements between communities and local government for management and use of the rangeland resources. It is anticipated that disaster risk management (DRM) and climate change adaptation (CCA) aspects will be incorporated into these agreements. To date, there are three dheeda 13 stakeholder action plans. However, neither of these approaches has yet produced a formal agreement to secure rights to resources between local rangeland users and local government, though it is hoped that at least one PNRM agreement will be achieved over the next few months.These approaches provide opportunities for landscape users and other stakeholders to be fully engaged in the planning and implementation of processes and activities related to landscape access and management at the local level. Indigenous knowledge, experience, and institutions are starting points for cooperation and learning. PNRM uses this as the foundation for analysis, planning, and decision-making -it provides room for different stakeholders to come together, discuss, identify challenges and analyse their causes, produce a common vision for development, negotiate, and agree on short-and long-term plans and roles for their implementation. It puts greater emphasis on community stakeholders to solve their problems and to implement solutions that work for them and the given context, without depending on external resources and \"expertise\". It is an approach based on longer-term facilitation of change processes, rather than being a short-term, event-focused approach.PRM provides an opportunity for planning and decision-making in a holistic and integrated manner, bringing different stakeholders together and providing space for a joint planning process. This occurs at a scale that is appropriate for local production and management systems. Development based on the sustainable use and management of resources has a greater chance of being successful in the long term. Implementation too demands an integrated approach that is led by local communities but involves other actors, including the private sector. The production of a management plan is not only a valuable process in its own right but also provides strategic direction for those involved.The approach is both transformative and participatory: the processes and structures developed are as important as the tools used during these processes or the improved techniques applied and activities implemented during the realisation of action plans. The right approach may not be identified immediately and adaptation or realignment may be required as the process develops.If the right structures, processes, and institutions are in place, then it is more likely that decisions made and solutions identified will be appropriate for a given context. This is likely to differ in situations where customary institutions are strong and in those where they are weak.Where customary institutions are weak, it may be necessary to support the development of new or adapted institutions that can develop the necessary skills and assume the appropriate authority to make required decisions. Where customary institutions exist, modern or statutory frameworks should not undermine their authority. Otherwise a situation will be created where customary authorities operate on the ground but have little or no power, while those institutions that have power have no presence or mandate on the ground.State authorities are best positioned for coordinating planning processes in rangelands. Those initiatives reviewed in this document that have worked closely with government and/or are well embedded in government structures at different levels have proved to be more sustainable than those that are not. Working with or through government strengthens the likelihood of processes and approaches being incorporated into future interventions. If a project or pilot works in an isolated manner its impact is likely to be less than if it works with partners who can take forward the lessons learned. Being part of an iterative learning process helps those involved to understand how processes evolve, how problems can be overcome, and how positive outcomes can be optimised.Experience has shown that some preconditions are required in order to conduct participatory land use planning activities successfully in a country or region. These are: » Freedom of assembly, opinion, and expression; » Existing need and demand for land use planning; » Political will to define land uses in a transparent and participatory way;» Willingness of all stakeholders to discuss together the optimum sustainable use of land and other resources -including high-ranking politicians, public authorities, and private investors;» Legal security and rule of law to ensure that all parties stick to the land use plan;» Integration of land use planning into official institutions and structures, resulting in legally binding land use plans (Wehrman 2011).In the three countries reviewed here, there is a significant way to go before these preconditions are fully realised. Land users are normally not included in land use planning decision-making processes. Not only is this a matter of poor representation processes; it is also because land users have little incentive to invest time and resources in such processes if they do not have secure access to the land. River basin and watershed planning are positive initiatives and go some way to addressing these gaps; however, firstly they may not take a systems approach to planning and, secondly, little thought has gone into adapting them appropriately to the specific characteristics of rangelands.Unless appropriate integrated and rangelands-specific planning takes place, the drive to focus on the development of rangelands with \"water as an entry point\" risks a return to the development interventions of the 1970s that have been criticised for failing to achieve their objectives and for destroying pastoral systems and societies (see Box 2). Rather, water needs to be considered as one component of many in the inter-related systems of drylands, and its relationships with and impact on other components need to be accounted for. Restricted and inflexible concepts such as carrying capacities also need to be considered with this in mind. Figure 6 shows the wells built as a result of the Arero Rangeland Development Project in the early 1970s, where an area east of Yabello town was demarcated into grazing blocks of 5x5 miles, with four blocks (i.e. 100 square miles) forming a grazing unit. Two ponds were constructed in each grazing unit. The plan was that a restricted number of livestock would occupy a grazing unit for three months in the dry season, using a rotational system to improve livestock productivity.Under this project, 16 ponds were constructed between 1970 and 1974, each with a capacity of between 10,000 and 60,000 cubic metres.Figure 7 shows one of several projects planned in relation to the water supply project currently being implemented in Borana. This water project will provide water for both domestic and livestock use. Based on MDG goals, water should be available within a 3km round trip in rural areas. Supply of water for livestock is based on the calculation that cattle (with sheep) require 4 ha of land, 15 l/c/d of water and should not be more than 5km from a water point. Camels (with goats) require 6 ha of land and 20 l/c/d, and should not be more than 7.5km from a water point.In both cases the rigid, pre-calculated use of the land based on perceived water requirements sits uneasily with the flexible and adaptive nature of resilient rangeland (including pastoral) systems. Though the importance of community participation is recognised and positive steps have been taken to mainstream participatory approaches, full inclusion is often not achieved. There is still a disconnect between decisions made in government offices and community planning on the ground. Rarely is there free, prior and informed consent of rangeland users for large infrastructure projects, even though these may have a fundamental impact on their livelihoods. \"Participation\" of communities tends to be through consultation rather than as partners who should in fact be leading the process at the local level. Pastoralists in particular feel that their views and needs are not incorporated into development planning. Good facilitators are hard to come by and it is difficult to retain and engage trainers without good incentives. Dependency of communities has been created by too much reliance on external technology. Regular dialogue and consensus building are vital for community mobilisation. For an action to succeed of the magnitude that many planning processes are, the issue in question must be salient, credible, and legitimate in the eyes of community members.Where community participation is a priority, women have taken an active role in the land use and development planning processes. However, the more complex addressing of gender issues (the balance of power, access to information and education, and control of resources) tends to be sidelined or added on as an afterthought. Women need to feel valued and to have an incentive in order to be willing to actively participate in meetings or activities.Changes in society such as more educated youth, exposure to different lifestyles, and more individualised values have redefined the way in which people interact with each other and with communities, with significant implications for the place of traditional norms and institutions in controlling access to and use of natural resources. Increasingly, customary institutions are left with little power, while those that have power have no presence on the ground. It is thus important to fill this governance and management vacuum in the most appropriate manner, and attempts have been made in the case studies here, with varying degrees of success. Hybrid governance structures incorporating both government and community institutions may be appropriate but these require significant support, including capacity building. Integrated large-scale planning is challenging. Programmes such as river basin development have often been over-ambitious and inflexible and have tried to adopt a blueprint approach, resulting in limited success. Interventions that provide opportunities for reflection, feedback, and adaptation are better positioned to cope with new challenges and problems (identified and solved in a participatory manner), and therefore are more likely to be sustainable in the long term. Projects and programmes must be based on realistic goals that are attainable within their lifespans and with the resources available. Planning is not an event but a process to be invested in.Planning and development of livestock watering points in drylands needs to be carried out in an integrated and participatory manner There has been inadequate M&E (and in particular independent evaluations) of interventions and insufficient follow-up to training. Where M&E has taken place, it has focused on tangible outputs rather than on important processes, such as who takes part, how and why they take part, or why something is working and another thing is not. There are weak linkages with informal and iterative learning processes. Participatory M&E systems may be supported but are lacking in design and implementation .The majority of drylands can have a major comparative advantage over non-dryland areas in livestock, tourism, renewable energy, and other uses. They are strategically located as the bridgehead to new markets beyond country borders. Large infrastructure investments are being established, including the LAPSSET corridor and related developments. However, if the opportunities created by these are to be realised, their planning needs to fully account for and incorporate their linkages to and likely impacts on the wider drylands area and the communities living there.From central government to local, there are new opportunities for more integrated planning and implementation that respond to the unique constraints and attributes of drylands and more specifically rangelands, and that can be sustained in the longer term. New drylands and ASAL-focused bodies and platforms provide opportunities for better and more appropriate support for livestock production systems. Tenure security and its enforcement, DRR, and the building of resilience of drylands and dryland communities all need to be considered in efforts to improve planning in rangelands.As a result of stronger devolution processes, mid-level layers of government will find it difficult to avoid land use planning and/or ignore existing land use plans. The success of good practice examples highlighted in this review opens the door for scaling up and replication. Tenure security for many inhabitants of rangelands is still a problem. This requires urgent attention, in particular in the face of the appropriation and in some cases \"grabbing\" of land, and increasing land use changes (both externally and internally driven). Across Kenya, Uganda, and Ethiopia opportunities exist for strengthening land tenure in rangelands, and resources and support are available for this. The lack of land use plans across the three countries has proved to be a debilitating factor for good integrated rangelands planning: all three countries have recognised this and have taken steps to produce plans at both national and other levels. This requires significant support from donors and NGOs.In all three countries, aid activities and support in drylands are moving from a majority humanitarian or food security-focused response to responses based on longer-term development. The new (for many) focus on \"resilience building\" provides a rationale and opportunities for focusing on and incorporating systems-based and non-linear approaches to development that are better suited to drylands than simple, linear, cause-and-effect approaches. It also provides opportunities for natural science to be brought back into the development narrative. The commitment of all three countries to the IDDRSI process, which has resilience building at its core, and the production of country programme papers to end drought emergencies, are reflections of this. New approaches to planning and in particular those that work with both government and communities to plan at scale, such as river basin planning, watershed management, ecosystem management, and PRM, are providing an increasing evidence base and proof that planning at scale is beneficial for both the environment and for societies. Where NGOs are trying to influence policy and legislative change, it is important to collaborate and provide a united front for advocacy and lobbying.Both government and NGOs are seeking to build capacity at different levels. There are increasing opportunities for investments from the private sector (e.g. commercial investors, water service delivery companies) or through carbon offsetting, and from donors (including the Global Alliance supporting IGAD's DDRSI process). There are also a number of integrated pastoral-focused programmes that have been established in recent months. Rewards (financial or non-financial) for environmental services and for voluntary and regulatory arrangements are also a relatively new source of funding, while also supporting a change in behaviour towards sustainable and adapted management of these ecosystems. The development of contingency funds for drought (and, for example, crisis modifiers) provide opportunities for readily available funds that can be mobilised quickly in order to respond effectively to crises such as droughts. This is a good example of how funds can be devolved to local authorities to better respond to local situations and needs.NGOs today are better placed and committed to working together than they have been in the past. Some donors have encouraged this, and such collaboration provides excellent opportunities for working and planning together. However, beyond these collaborative projects, NGOs still tend to work in \"silos\", and much can be done to improve joint planning, sharing of and more efficient use of resources, and \"harmonisation\" of approaches. Experience in the region has shown the value of conservation and research organisations working with development organisations. And with more decision-making power at lower levels, there should be more opportunity for coordination; however, where it is necessary to work across lower-level administrative boundaries, coordination bodies will be required to manage this (likely at higher levels). Over the past two decades, the number of regional and cross-continental bodies and initiatives has increased in order to provide a stronger, united, collaborative foundation for economic growth, pastoralism, NRM, and so on. These include the African Union, the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), and NEPAD, including the Land Policy Initiative and the Pastoralism Framework; the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA); CAADP; the East Africa Community (EAC); and the Nile Basin Initiative. These bodies provide different integration and coordination roles. The IDDRSI also provides an opportunity for cross-regional development coordination and drought response.Inclusion and participation are espoused across the constitutions, policies, and legislative framework in all the countries covered in this review. Communities are better placed to demand their role in decision-making and planning. However, in practice higher levels of participation of local rangeland users are still elusive. In general there is recognition of the value of indigenous knowledge and its incorporation into decision-making, and there is increasing evidence to support this. External actors such as NGOs can play a facilitating role in assisting communities to define their agendas, organise for advocacy, and engage with other stakeholders.In rangelands there is a much stronger case for governance structures to cut across administrative boundaries in order to reflect the reality of resource use and mobility. In this case a \"nested\" governance structure can hold more relevance, with governing institutions in place and functioning for each different layer of resource use (as it decreases in terms of numbers of uses and area from a landscape or rangeland to a well or tree). In a well functioning rangeland society there will be structures set up to govern these different resource units. And it is these units and their structures that traditionally form the basis of rangelands planning. As such, they should also form the basis of more formalised rangeland planning processes, including those led by government (and NGOs). The timing of planning in rangeland communities may also be different from government (and NGO) planning cycles.This demands a much more flexible planning timeframe. In Kenya the collapse of traditional authority is the main motivation for the establishment of WRUAs and other organisations for the management of natural resources, which derive their authority and legitimacy from statutory instruments and depend for enforcement of their rules on the formal machinery of law and order. WRUAs are different from traditional institutions in that they are made up of men, women, and youth and no preference is given to elders. Leaders of WRUAs are instead young people who have education and capacity to engage with government and other modern frameworks. However, it is recognised that for positive societal transformation the inclusion of elders is still important, and in some cases efforts are being made to ensure that elders are part of the WRUA membership and leadership (Odhiambo 2012).The sustained disruption of inter-related ecosystem and social processes in rangelands due to inappropriate development interventions and poor planning, together with protracted crises exacerbated by climate change and intermittent disasters, threatens the capacity of these systems to sustainably support food security and livelihoods in the future. There remains a bias in development policies and their implementation against rangelands, whose particular characteristics and requirements are not considered.Where good policies, legislation, and development strategies exist for rangelands, their implementation can be poor, aggravated by the lack of resources and poor capacities of local-level government in particular to implement them. Capacity building is crucial to enable institutional bodies and individual actors to achieve competence in implementing new measures. Finally, it is vital that funding and budgetary allocations are brought into line with the contribution that arid and semi-arid lands make both to national economies and to global well-being, and that they are adequate to support the often lengthy, complex, and in-depth processes of planning in drylands that are required.It is evident from this review that a number of initiatives are under way that have the potential to support the sustainable management of resources and improve the livelihoods of rangeland communities in the arid and semi-arid lands of the greater Horn of Africa. Though many of the initiatives are in their early stages, lessons have been learned that should form the basis for future development. A set of principles for rangelands planning is given in Box 3, and key recommendations are made below. » Systems approach, including environmental and livelihood concerns, plus influence of \"external\" factors.» Embedded in government systems, structures, and policies.» People-centred, demand-driven, community-owned.» Inclusiveness (particularly including mobile pastoralists).» Governance clear (roles/responsibilities) and functioning (including conflict resolution): potentially a \"nested\" governance approach.» Capacity building a priority (including problem-solving, knowledge management/ access, communication).» Transformative and iterative learning processes and innovation.» DRR and CCA mainstreamed.» Scal able and sustainable.Recommendations for improving integrated rangelands planning in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda For governments » Establish, strengthen, and enforce policies, legislation, structures, and mechanisms for development planning in the rangelands that provide for a more devolved, integrated, participatory, flexible, and adaptive approach that better reflects realities on the ground.A \"systems approach\" to development planning is appropriate.» Establish, strengthen, and enforce policies and legislation that protect the rights of local rangeland users to their land and resources.» Invest in the building of capacity of local government authorities in order to better understand the characteristics and requirements of rangeland environments and communities, and to support their transformation into more sustainable and productive entities, as appropriate.» Ensure that coordination mechanisms and structures are functioning and well resourced, in order to support multi-sector integrated planning.» Develop comprehensive land use plans for the country, with input from rangeland communities. Land use plans should also be developed for regions, counties, or zones as appropriate.» Work with the commercial sector and facilitate its greater involvement in development planning processes, in order to more effectively develop the provision of services that are well managed by communities.For donors » Fund development planning in the drylands and more specifically rangelands as a priority -at regional, national, or local levels. This can be government-, NGO-, or communityled. In all cases the involvement of government and community should be central, and linkages built up between the two. The capacities of both these actors (to lead and/or take part in planning processes) also need to be built up.» Provide longer-term and flexible funding that can better support the complex, multisectoral, multi-actor, often dynamic and protracted processes of planning in rangelands.Positive change can only be achieved if the appropriate finances are secured.» Fund the development of country-wide land use plans together with regional, county, or zonal plans as appropriate. This is likely to involve providing funds for the building up of the capacity of governmental experts to undertake land use planning and related activities.» Fund the piloting of different planning and management initiatives that contribute to the collection and sharing of good practice in order to influence better planning processes at government and community levels.» Fund the development of improved knowledge management systems that contain upto-date and appropriate information for development planning in rangelands, which is accessible and updated on a regular basis.» Use funding to leverage coordination and collaboration between different groups of development actors in order to develop better development planning and implementation.For NGOs and development agencies » Improve and develop processes and interventions that take a systems approach to development and environmental management, such as resilience-building. » Build the capacity of their own staff so that they better understand dryland/rangeland systems and are able to plan and develop appropriate activities that support them.Building skills such as conflict resolution, facilitating negotiation and consensus building, and participatory research and planning is also important.» Plan and implement programmes and activities at a scale appropriate for rangelands; this should follow the \"nested\" governance and management systems that exist in rangelands.» Pilot different planning and management initiatives that contribute to the collection and sharing of good practice in order to influence better planning processes at government and community levels. This should be done in conjunction with research-focused organisations and local government, and with independent evaluations carried out.» Assist governments in building the capacity of their staff in land administration, land use planning, integrated development planning (of which land use planning should be a part), institution building, and participatory approaches.» Improve collaboration and coordination of activities and information sharing with other NGOs, governments, and communities. Conservation organisations can provide expertise and experience in land use planning, and should be included in planning processes.For research organisations » As a priority, work with other research organisations, governments, NGOs, and communities to develop appropriate and context-specific planning processes that support sustainable development in the drylands This includes assisting them to better understand the particular characteristics and requirements of rangelands, and how best planning processes can reflect and account for these.» Improve collaboration and coordination of activities and information sharing with other research organisations, NGOs, governments, and communities through, for example, participating in platforms, technical working groups, and committees that are established for this purpose.» Pilot different planning and management initiatives that contribute to the collection and sharing of good practice in order to influence better planning processes at government and community levels. This should be done in conjunction with NGOs and local government.» Assist governments to develop improved knowledge management systems that contain up-to-date and appropriate information for development planning in rangelands, which is accessible and updated on a regular basis.» Work with other organisations to lobby and advocate for an improved policy and legislative environment for more sustainable and participatory development planning in rangelands. This includes better land policies and legislation that provide stronger security of rights to land and resources for rangeland users.» Encourage and assist communities to mobilise themselves in order to improve their planning processes, and to contribute to government-led ones. Communities' awareness of the benefits of doing so will need to be improved, and their skills and capacity to do so supported.» Assist communities to consider and agree their vision for the future, in order to be better prepared when opportunities arise to contribute to development planning processes.» Develop partnerships with other actors including government, NGOs (both development and conservation NGOs), and commercial companies. All can offer different resource, support, and capacity assistance -and taking a more strategic and planned approach to working with them can be advantageous.","tokenCount":"12879"} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/data/part_1/0171712001.json b/data/part_1/0171712001.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..914363c86d8cee01bf7ab06025bc25d8f75070d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/data/part_1/0171712001.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"metadata":{"gardian_id":"87140af0448be1471f000ebfea293fe4","source":"gardian_index","url":"https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/e6325bf4-340b-41e6-812a-93b772534425/retrieve","id":"1903013142"},"keywords":["Pinedal, C. Ordóñez2, J. Carabalí2, L. Foryl, S. Sánchez2, P. Olayal, E. Tabaresl, and Z. Lentinil, 2 1 SB2, 2IP4. Funding from GTZ, Germany. Project No. 99.7860.2-001.00 Pinedal, L. Foryl, E. GonzáJez l, A Mora2, T. Agrono2, C. Ordoñez2, C. Cruz2, E. Bolaños l , C.Doradol, A Minal, M.C. Duque l. 2, J. Silva2 and Z. Lentinil, 2 1 SB2, 2 IP4. GTZ, Germany. Project No. 99.7860.2-001.00 CIAT core funds , Ministerio Agricultura Colombia Lindarte. Memorias del Taller Regional, Parque Nacional lguazú, Argentina. Biotechnology Advisory Cornmision -llCA. Jacfoud, D.","Peng, K.","Feinstein, D. and Kilian, A. 2001. Diversity arrays: A solid state technology for sequence inforrnation. Nucleic Acids Res. 29: e25"],"sieverID":"941e718b-e94a-4b5c-a6f8-2ae619d1c1ac","pagecount":"484","content":"Narra ti ve Summary Measurable Indicators Means of Verification Goal To contribute to the sustainable increase of productivity CIA T scientists and partners using biotec hnology CIA T and NARS pubUcaúons. and quality of mandated and othcr priority crops, and the infom1atioo and tools in crop research. Statistics on agric ulture and biodive rsity. conservation of agrobiodiver¡ity in tropical countries. Genetic stocks available to key CIA T _Qartners. Purpose To conserve the genetic diversity and ensure lhat lnformatioo on diversity of wild and culúvated species. Publications, repons, and project proposals. characterized agrobiodiversity, improved crop geoetic Mapped economic genes and gene complexes. stocks, and modero molecular and cellular rnethods and lmproved genetic stocks, Unes, and populations. toob are used by CIAT and NARS scientists for i~viog, usiog. and cooserviog crop genetic resowt:es. Output 1 Geno mes chancterized of wild and c ultivated species of Molecular iofonnation on diversity of rnaodated and Publications, repons, and project proposals. rnalldated and ooomandated crops and of associated noomandated crops species, and relate0.005) discriminated three groups: early flowering (red rice 1-21-3, 1-3-4, and 5-36-4, and the Purple line) with a mean value 92 to 95 day-after-sowing (DAS); intermediate flowering (red rice 5-38-5, 4-12-2, and 5-48-2, and all the rice varieties and transgenic lines A3-49-60-12-3/Cica 8-2, A3-49-60-4-5/FB007-19-1) with a mean value of 99 to 110 DAS); late flowering (the transgenic line A3-49-60-4-5/FB007-19-2) with a mean value of 123 DAS. About 71 % red rice accessions flowered earlier than the variety Cica 8 and the transgenic line A3-49-60-12-3/Cica 8-2 (Table 1), and most red rice flowered earlier than and the transgenic line A3-49-60-4-5/FB007-19-2. No significant difference was noted in the number of tillers between the red rice, the transgenic lines and rice (Table 1). About 70% of the red rice was as tall as the transgenic line A3-49-60-12-3/Cica 8-2, and the Purple line, whereas the varieties Cica 8, Fedearroz 50 and Fedearroz Victoria 1 were taller than 70% of the red rice. Height differences seem not to be a critica! point to prevent gene flow. Song et al. (2003) detected gene flow between species of O. rufipogon and the rice commercial variety Minghui-63, which differed in 130 cm height (Table 1). Based on these results the transgenic line A3-49-60-12-3/Cica 8-2 was selected as one of the pollen donors for the gene flow studies. About 60% of plants from the line A3-49-60-12-3/Cica 8-2 showed gus expression, indicating that the gene was still segregating in this F3BC1 generation. In order to have enough plants for the gene flow studies, a total of 4011 plants were evaluated, and 2246 plants showed gus expression (56%). Flowering was synchronous between the red rice; the Purple line and the transgenic line A3-49-60-12-3/Cica 8-2. Most treatments involving the Purple line and red rice 1-21-3, 1-3-4, 5-36-4 and 5-38-5 overlapped in flowering. The highest synchrony in flowering was noted between red rice 4-12-2 and the Purple line, with 87% of plants with flowering overlap. In the case of the transgenic line, flowering overlap with red rice of 56 to 77 % plants was noted. Even though the red rice 5-38-5 flowered earlier than the transgenic line, there was overlap towards the end of the flowering cycle of the red rice. Wind velocity ranged from Oto 0,7 mis, the maximum mean value of 1.6 mis was registered from 10: 00 AM to 12 PM on cloudy days. Seeds from red rice, transgenic and Purple line were harvested keeping record of the plant location within each experimental plot.Progeny plants from the different treatments will be analyzed using specific microsatellites markers to identify hybrid plants, as well as by scoring gus expression and the presence of the NS3 and hph genes by PCR (when using the transgenic lineas pollen donor) or by the presence of anthocyanins in vegetative and reproductive tissues (when using the Purple lineas pollen donor). These analysis will not only give an estímate of rate of hybridization between the different experimental types, but al so the distan ce of gene flow, and will allow the optimization of an experimental approach to use molecular marker for tracing/ and monitoring genetic introgression from rice at large scale suitable for risk assessment in farmers fields and natural environments. ~ Hybrids plants will be used to study genetic introgression dynamics and persistence of domesticated genes 1 recipient population over time. The information generated will be used to define management practices allowing a safety deployment of transgenic rice in the tropics. Messeguer, J., Fogher, C., Guiderdoni, E., Marta, V., Catalá, M., Baldi, G. and Melé, E. (2001). Field assessments of gene flow from transgenic to cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) using a herbicide resistance gene as tracer marker. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103:1151-1159. Noldin, J., Yokoyama, S., Antunes, P. and Luzzardi, R. (2001). The work of CIA T on shrub legumes emphasizes the development of materials to be utilized as feed supplement during extended dry seasons. Tropical shrub legumes of high quality for better soils are readily available, but germplasm with similar characteristics adapted to acid, infertile soils is scarce. Flemingia macrophylla and Cratylia argentea have shown promising results in such environments and hence work on these genera is part of the overall germplasm development strategy of the CIA T Forages team.C. argentea is increasingly adopted and utilized, particularly in the seasonally dry hillsides of Central America, and more recently, the Llanos Orientales de Colombia. However, most research and development is based on only few accessions and hence activities to acquire and test novel germplasm of C. argentea is of high priority.F. macrophylla also is a highly promising shrub legume with excellent adaptation to infertile soils. In contrast to C. argentea, whose adaptation is limited to an altitude below 1200 masl, F. macrophylla can successfully be grown up to altitudes of 2000 masl.However, the potential utilization of F. macrophylla is so far Iimited by the poor quality and acceptability of the few evaluated accessions.The project aims to investigate the genetic diversity within collections ofF. macrophylla and C. argentea with three main objectives:1) To identify new, superior forage genotypes based on conventional gennplasm characterization/evaluation procedures (morphological and agronomic traits, forage quality parameters, including IVDMD and tannin contents) 2) To optimize the use and management, including conservation, of the collections.For this, different approaches to identify core collections for each species were tested and compared based on: (a) genetic diversity assessment by agroriomic characterization/evaluation; (b) germplasm origin information; and (e) molecular markers (RAPDs). 3) To assist future gennplasm collections on methodology, geographical focus and genetic erosion hazards.Agronomic characterization and evaluation. Space-planted, single-row plots in RCB design with three replications were established in Quilichao in March 1999 (Cratylia argentea, 39 accessions) and March 2000 (Flemingia macrophylla, 73 accessions).Additionally two replications were sown for seed production and morphological observations.The following parameters were measured in the trials: vigor, height and diameter, regrowth, incidence of diseases, pests and mineral deficiencies, and dry matter yield during wet and dry seasons. For the analysis of nutritive value, crude protein content and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) of the entire collections were analyzed. For the morphological evaluation, qualitative and quantitative parameters were measured, such as days to first flower, days to first seed, flower color, flowers per inflorescence, flowering intensity, pod pubescence, seeds per pod, seed color, Ieaf area, peduncle length, etc.For F. macrophylla, a more detailed analysis of nutritive value was conducted of a representative subset (25 accessions), which included high, intermediate and low nutritive value accessions. The groups were selected based on crude protein content and IVDMD. The chemical analysis comprised fiber (NDF, ADF, N-ADF), extractable and bound condensed tannin (ECT, BCf) content and astringency (protein binding capacity). Monomer composition of the extractable condensed tannin fraction (procyanidin:prodelphinidin:proelargonidin ratio = C:D:P) was determined with a highperformance liquid chromatography system (HPLC). Due to extremely variable results both between Iaboratory replicates and among field repetitions, statistical analysis was not possible.In order to give at least an idea of the monomer composition of extractable condensed tannins in F. macrophylla accessions, results from only five accessions, which were consistent between duplicates and among repetitions, are reported. Additionally, another subset of 10 accessions (9 high-quality accessions (18437,18438,21083,21090,21092,21241,21580,22082,22327) and CIAT 17403) was sampled 4, 6 and 8 weeks after cutting, to investigate the effect of age on digestibility as well as on protein, fiber and condensed tannin content and astringency.Based on data referring to the morphological, agronomic and feed quality variation of all accessions a core collection will be created, using multivariate statistic tools (Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis).Based on ecogeographical information on origin of accessions, a core collection was created, hypothesizing that geographic distance and environmental differences are related to genetic diversity. The analysis was conducted with FloraMapTM, a GIS tool developed by CIAT, which allows the production of climate probability models using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Cluster Analysis.Efforts made in genetic analysis showed that common manual DNA extraction methods did not work well with F. macrophylla and C. argentea. A modified protocol, which was used to extract DNA showed promising initial results. However, frequent degradation, contamination and partial digestion of DNA occurred, due to secondary plant compounds, probably polyphenols. In preliminary trials with a commercial extraction kit instead, the DNA purity was higher but partial digestion continued to be a severe problem. Various studies with amplified fragment length polymorphism markers (AFLPs), the method of choice, did not succeed and finally studies using this methodology could not be completed. Instead, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers, which do not require enzymatic digestion, were successfully employed.A total of 47 RAPD 10-mer primers (Operon Technologies, Alameda, CA, USA) were screened as single primers for the amplification of RAPD sequences. Primers with highest levels of polymorphisms were repeated to test for reproducibility and those that produced polymorphic, distinct and reproducible bands were chosen for RAPD analysis. Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) was performed on a matrix created based on the presence (1) or absence (O) of amplified bands. Subsequently, cluster analysis was performed on the coordinates obtained by MCA. Dendrograms were generated using UPGMA method. Nei 's coefficient was used as estimator of similarity between accessions in order to generate between-and within-group similarity tables. Diversity was estimated using Nei's H and GST estimators.Data analysis and synthesis. Individual and combined data analyses of all generated information was carried out using multivariate statistics. We have applied principie component analysis in all data sets (agronomic, morphological, geographical and molecular). In addition, cluster analysis was performed and the resulting clusters were compared to identify similarities.Agronomic characterization and evaluation. Results from evaluations per season carried out for Cratylia argentea and Flemingia macrophylla indicated considerable phenotypic and agronomic variation in the collections studied. Data for C. argentea and F. macrophylla have been presented already in previous reports.For C. argentea, IVDMD varied between 59 and 69% and crude protein content between 18 and 24%. Mean dry matter production was 2.2 (range 0.8 to 5.2) t/ha and 1.93 (range 0 .6 to 3.3) tlha in the wet and dry season, respectively. Dry season yields were relatively high and confirm the good adaptation of C. argentea to dry conditions.There was a pronounced effect of season on sorne agronomic and quality traits. DM production was higher in the rainy season than in the dry season whereas ADF was higher in the dry than in the wet season. A season x genotype interaction was detected for IVDMD.The cluster analysis dendrogram (Ward's Method) was truncated at the 6-group level. The detailed agronomic characteristics of each group are listed in ). Productivity of these accessions was higher than yields of the cultivar released in Costa Rica (cv. Veraniega) and Colombia (cv. Veranera) -an accession mixture of CIAT 18516/18668 (yield 1.9 and 3 tlha). In addition to the higher yield, these accessions (18674, 22375, 22406, 22408 and 22409) also had equal or superior digestibility values (65 to 69%) and crude protein content (20 to 24%) in comparison to CIAT 18516/18668 (IVDMD 64 to 67%, CP 21 to 24%).Based on high forage yield and good seed production potential we selected CIAT 18674, 22375, 22406, 22408 and 22409 for seed multiplication and regional testing (Table B). 18676,18957,22373,22400,22410,22412 Group 6 (very highlaverage yields, good regrowth, high digestibility, high CP, low AFD, higher NDF than group 4): CIAT 18516, 18667, 18668, 18671, 18674,22379,22404,22407,22408,22409 In F. macrophylla, accessions evaluated differed in IVDMD, DM production, ECI', tannin extractability (ECI'/total Cf) and astringency (protein binding capacity) whereas CP and BCT showed only minor variability. IVDMD varied from 28 to 58% and crude protein content from 13 to 25%. Mean dry matter production was 2.08 tlha in the wet and 1.18 t/ha in the dry season.The chemical composition of 25 F. macrophylla accessions with contrasting digestibility varied greatly among accessions and in response to harvest season (Tables C and D). Monomer composition of the extractable CT fraction in 5 accessions F. macrophylla was quite variable due to accession but not due to season of the year (Fig. A). In four accessions (CIAT 20621, 20744, 20975 and 20976) prodelphinidin made up more than half of the proanthocyanidins (range from 49 to 79% ). The second most important constituent was propelargonidin, which ranged from 16 to 38%. Procyanidin was only present in small proportions (O to maximum 16%). It was interesting to observe that in CIAT 21092 propelargonidin represented 82% of total proanthocyanidins in the rainy season and 95% in the dry season. Procyanidin was absent and prodelphinidin was less than 20%.The five accessions for which we have reliable data on monomer composition of ECT are not representative of the entire Flemingia collection in terms of forage quality. However, four of them had very high ECT concentrations (13-17%) whereas CIAT 21092 presented relatively low ECf levels (7 and 4% in the rainy and dry season, respectively). The latter had an exceptionally high propelargonidin proportion but totally lacked cyanidin, which could indicate a relationship between monomer composition and forage quality. Analysis of a subset of 10 high-quality accessions (including control) showed that forage quality varied over time. Pattems were different in the rainy and dry season for both the averaged values of the 10 accessions and for individual accessions (Fig. B). Correlations found in this analysis confirmed the negative correlations between IVDMD and ECT and IVDMD and astringency.Season had a large effect on IVDMD, DM production, plant height and diameter (higher in the rainy than in the dry season) and ADF, NDF, ECT and astringency (slightly higher in the dry season than in the rainy season). Extractability (percentage ECT of total CT) was relatively stable between harvest seasons (differences <10%). Only in six accessions (CIAT 17403, 18438, 20616, 20622, 21092 CIAT 18048,20972,20976,20978,20980,20982,21982,21991,21992,21995,21996,22327 Group 4 (high digestibility, highlaverage yields, good regrowth, highlaverage CP, high vigor, average plant height): CIAT 18437, 18438, 20975, 21083,21087, 21090, 21092, 22082 Group 5 (average digestibility, high yields, average regrowth, high CP, high vigor, high plant height): CIAT 801, 7184, 20622, 20625 , 20626, 20631, 20744, 21241, 21248, 21249, 21519, 21529, 21580, C104890, 115146, J001 Group 6 (like group 5, but lower yields, lower vigor and lower plant height): CIAT 19453, 19454, 19797, 19798,19799,20065 Group 7 (low digestibility, highlaverage yields, average regrowth, high CP, high vigor, average plant height): CIAT 17400, 17403, 17404, 17405, 17407, 17409, 17411, 17412, 17413, 18440, 19457, 19800, 19801, 19824,20616,20617,20618,20621,20624 Genetic analysis by molecular markers (RAPDs): Out of 47 random primers tested, 9 were chosen that produced 171 RAPD bands ranging from 4 to 18 polymorphic bands per primer. Eight primers were selected for Flemingia macrophylla (DOl, D04, D15, 107, J04, J06, J07, Jl2), and six for Cratylia argentea (D15, G12, 107, J06, J07, J12) (Table F). Analysis of genetic diversity within accessions revealed high variability. Nei and Li similarity between groups often was as high or higher than within groups (Table G). This could indicate either seed contamination of accessions and/or outcrossing during multiplication in the field. Research on reproduction of C. argentea is urgently required to determine the rate and impact of outcrossing in this species. (1992). Oiven the different sources of the microsatellites we compared the polymorphism rates of markers derived frorn genes versus those derived from random genomic sequences.Populations and DNA extraction. Two populations of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) were used for this study: the first population 'was based on the cross DOR364 x 019833 (and heretofore will be referred to as the DO population). A total of 87 RILs were developed for this cross by a modified single seed descent from the F2 to the F9 generation. The plants within the F9 progeny row were bulked and used for subsequent genetic analysis. The second population was based on 91 RILs from the cross BAT93 x JaloEEP558 whose development and origins are described by Freyre et al. (1998). Total genomic DNA for each of the recombinant inbred lines in both populations was isolated from bulked leaf tissues of eight greenhouse-grown plants per line, using a CT AB extraction method.Source and development of markers. We used three sets of markers in this study: 1) genomic microsatellites developed in this laboratory by Oaitán-Solís et al. (2002); 2) genecoding microsatellites developed by Yu et al. (1999Yu et al. ( , 2000) ) and 3) additional gene-coding and non-coding microsatellites from searches for SSR containing Phaseolus sequences deposited in the Oenbank database before July 15, 2001. SSRs were found using the SSR identification tool (SSRIT) that screens for all possible dimeric, trimeric and terameric repeats. Only sequences containing a mínimum of three tetra-nucleotide, four tri-nucleotide or five di-nucleotide motif repeats were used for primer design. Primers were designed using Primer 3.0 software to produce PCR amplification fragments that were on average 150 bp long, and PCR primers with consistent melting temperatures of 55°C or above and an average length of 20 nucleotides. Primer pairs were checked to make sure that they had similar rnelting temperatures and did not suffer from palindromes or end pairing.Microsatellite analysis. Polymorphisms between the mapping parents were determined on parental survey gels. Standard microsatellite PCR conditions were used throughout and the PCR reaction was carried out in 20 rnL final volumes. Gel staining and image capture are as described in more detail by Gaitan et aL (2002). The sizes of the parental alleles were estimated based on 10 bp and 25 bp molecular weight ladders. To determine the genotypes of the progenies, alleles were scored based on the parental bands that were amplified as controls along with the RIL individuals.Data Analysis. Segregation distortion was measured with a Chi-square test for an expected 1:1 ratio and segregation data was used to place the microsatellites on the established genetic maps for the DG and BJ populations (Beebe et al. 1998;Freyre et al. 1998) (1992). Linkage analysis was conducted with the software application Mapmaker 2.0 using a mínimum LOD of 4.0.A total of 150 cornrnon bean microsatellites were used in this study. Of these, 81 were anonymous genornic or non-coding microsatellites and 69 were gene-derived rnicrosatellites. In the Genbank searches, SSRs were found in a range of coding and noncoding sequences. The highest number of repeats detected in the simple sequence repeats was nine, while the average number of repeats was 5.5 among all the microsatellites identified. Genomic microsatellites hada significantly higher (P=0.02) average number of repeats than gene rnicrosatellites (6.2 versus 5.3) in unpaired t-test. In this study, di and tri-nucleotide motif containíng microsatellites did not have significantly different average number of repeats. All the microsatellite markers were screened for amplification products and polymorphism in the parents of the DG and BJ populations and no difference in band intensity between the cDNA and genomic derived microsatellites was observed. A majority of the microsatellites produced single bands for the parents. Polymorphism rates for the DG and BJ populations were 65.4 and 63.2% for the genomic microsatellites, and 46.3 and 46.2% for the genic rnicrosatellites, respectively. Overall the percentage of polymorphism between the parents of both populations was very similar: a total of 84 out of the 150 microsatellites tested for the parents of the DG population were polymorphíc (56.0%), while a total of 68 out of the 122 rnicrosate]Jjtes tested for the parents of the BJ population were polymorphic (55.7%).A total of 100 new microsatellite loci were placed on the two genetic maps (78 on the DG population and 22 on the BJ population) during this study. Microsatellite loci were found on each of the eleven chromosomes of the species and each chromosome was tagged with at least five or more microsatellite. Two chromosomes, B02D and B04B hada relatively greater number of microsatellites placed on them, with 17 and 13 markers respectively; while the average number of microsatellite loci per chromosome was 10. The total cumulative map length for the DG population was 1720 cM with an average chromosome length of 156.4 cM. The average distance between microsatellite loci in this map was 19.5 cM; however the distribution of loci was variable and several large gaps between microsatellites remained on the map. The largest gaps between microsatellite markers remained on chromosomes bOl, b07, b08 and bll. Among the markers that presented multiple bands, duplicate loci could be mapped for two markers.The gene-based microsatellites were better distributed than the genomic microsatellites and several clusters of genomic microsatellites were found on almost every chromosome except b06 and b08 which were the linkage groups with the fewest microsatellites.This study brings toa total of 115, the microsatellite loci located on the bean genetic map and provides coverage for every chromosome in the genome with from five to twenty markers each. Although the genomic distribution of microsatellite markers in this study tended to be random, sorne large gaps between microsatellites occurred and certain chromosomes contained more microsatellite loci than others. As single-locus markers, the microsatellites in this study were specific to a given place in the genome and this allowed them to be used for comparati ve mappíng across both the DG and BJ populations. This comparative mapping showed the consistency of microsatellite location on both populations: with all the microsatellites mapping to the same individual chromosome and equivalent map locations in each of the populations. Mapping in two populations was useful for placing microsatellites that were monomorphic in one or the other of the populations. Comparative mapping allowed us to determine the identity and orientation of each linkage group and to obtain a more accurate position for each of the microsatellites. The synteny between maps as reflected by the map order of jointly mapped markers was conserved providing further evidence that no major rearrangements have occurred in the common bean genome.The current set of microsatellite markers described in this study provides the basis for anchoring and aligning genetic maps one to each other based solely on PCR-based markers, something that previously was done with single-copy RFLP markers or by tentatively associating RAPD bands found in different populations. Therefore, the microsatellites make ideal second-generation markers for the whole genome analysis important for gene tagging and quantitative trait loci studies. The microsatellites mapped during the course of this research will also be invaluable for marker assisted selection because they are simple to analyze, specific for single genes of interest and diagnostic in most crosses dueto their high level of polymorphism. The mapped microsatellites can also provide a good set from which to chose markers for studies of genetic diversity in comrnon bean.Nutritionai genornics is being used as part of the Biofortification Challenge Program to discover the basic mechanisms for mineral uptake and accumulation. As part of this program CIA T is collaborating with the Grusak lab at the USDA-Baylor College of Medicine to determine the genes in common beans that determine iron uptake and utilization. As part of the overall genomics approach, information from other well studied specíes such Medicago truncatula, peas and soybeans, as weii as other model species such as Arabidopsis thaliana which have extensive genetic and molecular resources are being used for gene discovery and functional analysis. The underlying concepts of this work are to take advantage of metabolic unity among plants to characterize gene function and to apply bioinformatics and molecular cloning approaches to identify potential orthologous genes.As a first example of this approach the Grusak lab is trying to dissect the importance of iron reductase in the accumulation of iron in beans by assaying iron reductase activity in roots and by cloning an ortholog of the gene from common bean based on similarity to the same gene already isolated from Medicago truncatula and from Pisum sativum (Pea). Iron reductase is a member of the protein super-family of flavocytochromes and functions to convert iron from an unavailable form (ferric, Fe3+) to an available form (ferrous, Fe2+) that can be readily absorbed by plants. The iron reductase protein (FRO) is located in roots and straddles the root cell membrane where it is active for iron reduction and was first isolated from A. thaliana and P. sativum. both of which are fairly efficient at extracting iron from the soil and serve as model species for enzyme activity.SCAR marker. the Grusak lab selected conserved primers for RT -PCR based on the Pisum iron reductase gene (PsFR01). At CIAT we tried using these primers for mapping of the gene as a SCAR marker.Reductase Assay. In the Grusak lab, seeds are genninated for 3-4 days then planted in a hydroponic system for 12 days of growth in various levels of iron concentration (eg. 2, 5 , 10 and 20 uM Fe). Iron reductase assay is conducted at the end of this period by removing the entire root systems of four plants and staining for reduced iron measured as umol Fe reduced/g FW/hr.The SCAR primers produced multiple banding pattems that were not of the expected size range, suggesting that the conservation between common bean and peas for this gene is low, and that it will be difficult to clone via a direct PCR approach. Given this the Grusak lab has been screening a common bean leaf cDNA library which we made at CIAT and will begin next year to screen a set of two root leaf cDNA librarles, where the mRNA for iron reductase is more likely to be expressed.The iron reductase assay is producing interesting results that suggest that there are differences between parents of severa! mapping populations for their ability to reduce iron (Table 1). These differences are evident more at low Fe concentration than at high iron concentration and seem to be somewhat correlated with the seed iron status of the parents, for example in the cross of G21242 x G21078, the high iron parent G21242 has higher reductase activity than the low iron parent G21078. Many of the wild accession also had low reductase activity as well, except for the Colombian accession G24404, which in contrast had high reductase activity and therefore will be investigated further in future experiments.1t was notable that significant difference exist between the parents of the DOR364 x G19833 mapping population ata range of hydroponic Fe concentrations (Figure 1) and that these results were consistent with the results observed in the first trial with multiple parents at 2 uM and 15 uM Fe concentrations (Table 1). More information on this trait will be reported next year when a set of recombinant inbred lines have been fully tested and the QTLs for this trait localized.• Evaluate Fe reductase activity in a greater number of parents of other populatíons and a range of Fe concentrations for each paren t.• Evaluate the full set of recombinant inbred lines from the DOR364 x G19833 and G21078 x G21242 crosses to determine inheritance and location of QTLs for Fe reductase activity.• Develop a DNA marker for Fe reductase activity either based on QTL mapping or cloning and mapping of orthologs of the Fe reductase gene. Part of the effort to increase the nutritional quality of common bean has concentrated on increasing iron bioavailability, where bioavailability is the proportion of the consumed nutrient that is digested, absorbed and utilized by human beíngs. Bioavailability is determined by both food composition and the nutrient status of the consumer as well as a mix of promoters (such as sulfur ami no acids: methionine and cysteine, vitamin A or C and lipid content) and anti-nutritional factors (including fiber, lectins, phytates, polyphenolics and tannins, as well as Calcium and Manganese). Among the anti-nutrients, tannins are important because of their ability to interact with proteins and to chelate minerals which results in reductions in protein digestibility and mineral bioavailability. Tannins are derived from phenolic compounds and contribute to the coloring found in common bean seed coats. They can be divided into hydrolizable 1 soluble tannins (derived from Gallic acid) and condensed tannins 1 proanthocyanadins (derived from polymerized flavonoids), which are measurable by different techniques.Previous studies looking at overall tannin content m bean seed coat, using a water/methanol extraction found variability in the content of tannins in seed coats of different varieties of common beans. In this study our objective was to identify the genetic variability for tannin in a segregating population and to collect preliminary evidence on the inheritance of soluble and insoluble tannin content in the seed coats of recombinant inbred lines from the cross DOR364 x 019833. In this study we applied a more accurate extraction technique and began to look at the inheritance of various fractions of tannin con ten t.Tannin extraction. Total tannin extraction and analysis followed the methods of Jones et al. (1976) andTerrill et al. (1992). Extraction involved the use of a mix of acetone/water/diethyl ether. Colorimetric tannin analysis was realized with a Butanol-HCl method which allows total condensed tanriins to be measured. A butanol-water (5%) mix was used as a blank. This method had been standardized for forage tannin analysis and has been used successfully for the analysis of tannins in sorghum•grain.Plant Material. Tannins were extracted from seed coats that had been peeled from common bean seed, dried at 60 C for one hour and ground into a fine powder to use in the analysís. An n-heptane treatment was used to facilitate seed peeling and consisted in 12 hours immersion in the n-heptane solution, followed by seed drying and hand-peeling. Different amounts of ground seed coat were used for the parents (30 g) than for the individual recombinant inbred lines (15 mg). This was done to obtain enough purified tannin from the parents to construct the concentration calibration curves used in the analysis of the pro gen y. Three replicates were used per seed coat sample for the analysis.Soluble and insoluble tannins were successfully purified from DOR364 and G 19833, the parents of the population, to use for the detennination of a calibration curve for absorbance vs. concentration to use in estimating the amount of tannins in the progeny. The color of the dried tannin extract was darker and more reddish for the DOR364 tannins than for the 019833 tannins as would expected from their respective seed coat colors. When the progeny and parents were tested against the calibration curve, a range of seed coat tannin concentrations (expressed in percent) were observed (Figure 1). Soluble tannin was found to range from 13 to 41%, while insoluble tannin ranged from 1 to 8 %, depending on the progeny lines tested in the population. The parents had similar amounts of soluble tannins (both around 26%) while DOR364 contained more insoluble tannin (5.3 %) than did 019833 (2.9 %). The normal distribution of both soluble and insoluble tannins in the population suggests that both are inherited as quantitative traits.We will use a QTL analysis approach to determine the genes involved in tannin content in common bean seed coats and use this information to devise a strategy for reducing specific fractions of tannins with the hope of increasing bioavailability of iron in beans. The strength with which we pursue the strategy of reducing tannins to increase iron bioavailability, must be counterbalanced by the evidence that sorne tannins have been shown to have beneficia! aspects as anti-oxidants and anti-carcinogens. lntroduction Thrips palmi ís a damaging insect pest of common bean and other dicotyledenous crops that was introduced from Asia (Java, Indonesia) into the Americas during the last decade.Starting in the Caribbean, (Cuba, Dominican Republic, Haiti and Puerto Rico) the species spread rapidly into the United States and northem South America (Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela). The greatest damage inflicted to common bean production in Colombia is seen in climbing bean varieties that are grown for the fresh market (including snap beans and Cargamanto dry beans). Sequential plantings, common in the production of snap beans is very conducive to heavy infestations of thrips and whiteflies, which are synergistic in the damage that they inflict. Misuse of insecticides also can lead to resurgence in thrips populations. Host plant resistance on the other hand is a promising component in an integrated cropping system to reduce damage by Thrips palmi Kamy. Therefore the objective of this research was to identify the stability of Thrips resistance across environments and the genes and QTLs controlling this resistance.The BAT881 x 021212 population, consisting in 139 F5:7 generation RILs, was evaluated over three seasons at a field site in Pradera, Valle, Colombia. The details on phenotypic data collection are reported in CIAT-AR (2000). A genetic map was constructed based on the screening of 151 RAPD markers and 107 microsatellites as reported in CIAT-AR (2002). A linkage map was constructed in two phases; first with the RAPD markers only and then with both RAPD and microsatellite markers. The software package MAPMAKER3.0 (Lander et al., 1987), was used to generate the genetic map, whereby genetic mapping was done by: first, grouping markers at LOD > 5.0 and then, ordering them at LOD > 3.0 using three point analysis with a maximum inter-marker distance of 37.2 cM. Broad sense heritabilities (h2) on an entry-mean basis in seasons and across seasons were calculated for both resistance traits based on mean square ANOV A results, genotypic variance (cr2g), phenotypic variance (cr2p), genotype x season interactions (cr2gs), and error variance (cr2e). Arbitrary linear (orthogonal) contrasts were conducted, using the Scheffe's F-test, to compare among (1) the five most resistant Rll..s, (2) the five most susceptible RILs, (3) the BAT881 parent, (4) the G21212 parent and (5) the susceptible PV A 773 check (Statistix, 1998). Quantitative trait loci (QTL) were identified through single-point regression analysis (SPA) and interval mapping analysis (IM) with the software packages Qgene, and QTLCartographer Vl.21, respectively. In the SPA analysis, probability thresholds of 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 were used. In the 1M analysis a LOD threshold of 2.5, a window size of 10 cM anda 2 cM walking step were used to determine the presence and location of QTLs and whether there was evidence for more than one QTL on linkage groups with multiple LOD peaks.which had been run on the progeny.The cross BAT881 x 021212 was found to produce progeny showing transgressive segregation for thrips resistance. Correlations between damage and reproductive adaptation scores were significant in seasons, and significant correlations existed between seasons. Broad sense heritabilities were moderate ranging from 32.4 to 63.4% depending on the parameter and the season (Table 1). The genetic map constructed for the cross had 11 linkage groups, eight of which could be identified as homologous to the chromosomes of the integrated linkage map of common beans, three of which remained unidentified. The most important thrips resistance QTL was located on chromosome b06, linked to two microsatellites and one RAPD marker, explaining up to 27.7% of variance in SPA. This QTL was located at the same region as the bc-3 and Ur-4 resistance genes. Other minor QTLs for thrips resistance were found on chromosomes b02, b03, b08, and b09, sorne of which were located in regions of genes encoding for disease resistance. The identification and mapping of thrips resistance genes is one of the first studies on insect resistance QTLs in common beans and is expected to facilitate the development of resistant bean cultivars by using molecular marker assisted selection.Continue mapping with additional microsatellites to achieve complete map coverage in the BAT881 x 021212 population This year we continued a project begun in 2001 to tag resistan ce to the bean pod weevil (Apion goodmani Wagner) which damages beans grown in Mexico and Central America. Resistance is controlled by two possible mechanisms -either antibiosis involving a hypersensitive response that encapsulates the oviposition siteor antixenosis that affects the preference of oviposition sites. Epistasis between two independent genes, Agr and Agm, has been suggested to control the hypersensitive response. The fact that a few genes control resistance may explain why it has been relatively easy to transfer resistance from Mexican landraces where it is found to new breeding lines with Central American grain types. The objectives of this research were to identify additional markers linked to the genes controlling resistance in the recombinant inbred line (Rll..) population derived from Parental Survey and Genetic Mapping. Genetic material consisted in a total of 104 F5 derived recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from the cross Jamapa x 1117, where Jamapa is a susceptible cultivar released in Mexico and 1117 is a resistant breeding line. Screening of susceptible and resistant bulks (of 4 lines each) has continued from last year with a total of over 150 microsatellite markers. A genetic map was constructed with the new dataset of 104 lines and all the polymorphic RAPD markers using the program Mapmaker.RAPD cloning and SCAR primer design. Two RAPD bands (W9-1300S; Z4-800R) that were polymorphic from last year's survey and whích were significantly associated with the resistance phenotype were selected for cloning. The RAPD bands were purified in 4% polyacrylamide gels whích were used directly for a second round PCR amplification. U pon confirming that a single band had been arnplified thís DNA was purified from a 1% Iow melting point agarose gel using a Wizard PCR prep purification system (Promega). The purified insert DNA was cloned into the PGEM-T easy vector system for further analysis. Several clones were picked per ligation reaction and their inserts sequenced using standard techniques, TI and Sp6 primers and an ABI377 DNA sequencer. Specific primers were designed for each unique sequence using Primer 3.0 software and these were tested for their ability to amplify SCAR products. Any monomorphic SCAR products were digested with frequent cutting restriction enzymes (Alul,Haem,Rsal and Sau3AI).As in last year's results, most of the markers were Iinked to each other in five tight linkage groups representing chromosome bOl, B05, B07, B08 and Bll, each with four or more markers per Iinkage group. The most significant markers occurred on chromosome bOl including the two RAPDs targeted for this SCAR development, W9-1300S and Z4-800R. We will continue to refine the genetic map with new markers for the other four significant linkage groups.BLAST searches identified homologies for the two cloned RAPD bands. Severa} similar clones from each RAPD, showed that W9-1300S was derived from a retrotransposon, while Z4-800R was derived from an unknown Soybean gene.A total of 5 primer sets were designed for the two RAPD band sequences and these were tested on the population parents and on the bulks. AU the primer sets showed monomorphism as SCARs. When the PCR products were digested with the frequent cutting restriction enzymes, polymorphism was revealed for the fragrnent W9-1300-15. This potential CAPS (Cleaved amplified product) marker will be tested across the full population during the upcoming year.Bean golden yellow mosaic virus (BGYMV) is a devastating disease of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Latín America. It was first observed in Brazil in the early 60s, and a decade later it became the main biotic constraint to bean production in Brazil, demonstrating its considerable epidemiological potential for this country, Central America, the Caribbean and Mex.ico (Morales, 1994). Although the disease is not found in Colombia, indirect selection through molecular markers can be accomplished successfully (Beebe et al., 2002). Since 1999, a marker-assisted selection (MAS) breeding scheme has been applied using the SCAR marker DOR21 linked to the bgm-1 gene. Breeding for BGYMV has been facilitated and accelerated with this strategy, which is beginning to be used in other countries such as Cuba (Rodríguez et al., 2002). Last year efforts were made to use a second marker for a QTL (quantitative trait locus), identifi.ed in collaboration with USDA-Puerto Rico and the University of Puerto Rico severa! years ago. This marker is also a SCAR (named W12) and was planned to be used as a large-scale tool, such as DOR21, in the identification of plants carrying the resistance genes for BGYMV.Alkaline DNA ex.traction and PCR for the bgm-1 marker were performed for MAS purposes as described previously (Quintero et al., 2002). Visualization of amplified products was carried out as usual, except that samples were loaded three times per comb instead of two as done previously.Given that the PCR conditions for W12 SCAR used last year yielded either unamplified products or spurious bands that made the screening difficult and time consuming, changes in annealing temperatures of the oligonucleotide primers and different PCR profiles were assayed first in a set of 27 bean varieties, and those that gave best results were applied for screening the F 7 red-and black-seeded farnilies. Once PCR conditions were set, a multiplex assay including both markers was performed as follows: each reaction contained 5 Jll of the alkaline DNA diluted 1:1 in sterile water or 20 ng of pure DNA; 0.2 mM each dNTPs, 0.2 JlM each forward and reverse W12 primers, 0.1JlM each forward and reverse DOR21 primers, 10 mM Tris-HCI pH 8.8, 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCh and 1 unit of Taq polymerase for a total volume of 15Jll. PCR products were resolved in a 0.5X TBE agarose gel with ethidium brornide at a final concentration of 0.02 Jlg/ml. Presence or absence of both SCAR markers was scored.In addition, new primer sets were designed from the sequence of the amplified fragment provided by P. Miklas (USDA-ARS Prosser, WA). These new primer sets were also assayed with bean varieties known for the presence/absence of DOR21 andlor W12 SCARs. The assays were first performed with DNA extracted using the protocol of Afanador et al. (1993) and then with the alkaJine method routinely used forMAS .MAS for introducing BGYMV resistance in small-seeded beans continued as reported last year, and then F 1 plants were screened for the presence of the bgm-1 marker. Twenty-four segregant populations (BGMV code 548 to 607), corresponding to F 1 multiple crosses for drought stress and high iron content, were evaluated. Of 1794 individual plants, 722 had the bgm-1 marker in homogeneous state and 122 in heterogeneous state. These plants were selected and will be evaluated under drought stress next season.In addition, a set of F6-F 7 derived farnilies under drought stress was screened for the presence of DOR21 and W12 SCAR markers. The marker for bgm-1 was detected in either the heterogeneous or homogenous state in 644 out of 1350 F 7 farnilies tested. The W12 marker was detected in 585 of these farnilies (Table 1). Both markers occurred ata similar frequency (bgm-1, 43% and W 12, 48% ). Al so, the number of red-and black-seeded farnilies having both markers was comparable: 200 (20%) and 74 (22%), respectively. A multiplex assay using DOR21 and the original W12 primers was conducted in four bean varieties and pure extracted DNA. Identical PCR products were obtained when comparing individual amplification of the SCARs and the multiplex (Fig. 1). Using a multiplex assay would speed up the MAS process, but a more specific W12 marker would be needed. Among six sets of designed forward and reverse primers, two sets were selected. The first yielded even more spurious bands than the original W12 oligonucleotides, but the second was more specific and produced a single band at 614 bp (Fig. 2).Figure 2.PCR amplification of shorter region W12 marker (614 bp). Lane 1-8, bean varieties whose DNA was extracted using the alkane method; Lanes 9-13, pure DNA checks, Tío CaneJa 75, DOR 364, G19833, SAM1 and EMP496. Lane 14, original W12 fragment (732 bp).These new W12 oligonucleotides were more specific, at least in the small set of varieties selected for this study. Since no amplification was obtained in 019833 in contrast with the original oligonucleotides, it would be useful to run this new set of primers in the mapping population DOR 364 x 019833, prior to applying it for large-scale screening.The bgm-1 gene is being introduced through MAS on small-seeded farnilies also tolerant to the main biotic and abiotic constraints to bean production.Attempts were made to bring W12 SCAR to a high-throughput screening strategy, comparable to that of DOR21. Changes in PCR profiles for the amplification of the original fragment yielded more confident results than last year assays and were started to be used.A multiplex of both SCARs available for BOYMV resistance was successfully run in a set of bean varieties with known performance for both SCARs. Troubles with spurious bands or no amplification seemed to be overcome as a more specific set of forward and reverse primers for W12 fragment was designed.New W12 primers should be tested in the mapping population DOR 364 x 019833.Last year we described the testing on a total of 63 genotypes (including 7 wild accessions of common bean that were the sources of the seven variants of arcelin known to exist; 28 advanced breeding lines from the bruchid resistance program (either RAZ or GG designations); and 28 bruchid-susceptible parents used in crosses with Arel or Are 5 containing lines) of seven rnicrosatellite markers that were linked to the Arcelin resistance gene which is the most effective resistance factor for the most common storage pests of common bean, narnely the Mexican bean weevil, Zabrotes subfasciatus (Boheman). This year, our objective was to replace the serological/ protein based selection of arcelin in our Red Mottled common bean breeding program with a genetic assay using two of the rnicrosatellites that were most closely linked to arcelin. We analyze the two markers for their ability to distinguish susceptible and resistant genotypes and individual alleles of the Arcelin gene and confirm these results with both protein assays, insect feeding tests and replicated trials for the most resistant lines. The long-term objective of this work is to increase the efficiency of breeding for multiple constraint resistance and facilitate the pyramiding of bruchid resistance with other biotic and abiotic stress resistances. The conversion of the protein based selection of arcelin to a usable DNA marker obviates the need for arcelin-specific antibodies and protein electrophoresis and streamlines arcelin selection with the widespread use of other SCAR markers that we have also embarked on in our breeding prograrn. In addition to its compatibility with other types of DNA based markers, the advantages of using the microsatellites over the time-consuming protein based selection was they were amenable to high-throughput and fast analysis.Genetic materials and Phenotyping. A set of 796 F4 and Fs derived advanced lines from multiple crosses between RAZ lines and susceptible parents were used in the marker assisted selection experiments. Of these, 772 were Andean genotypes from the breeding program for Red Mottled beans and 24 were Mesoamerican genotypes from the breeding program for Small Red beans. All 796 lines were tested for bruchid resistance using a single replicate of 30 seeds infested with 6 pairs of Zabrotes subfasciatus (Boheman) in a small mesh covered clear plastic vial whose walls were covered with sandpaper (No. 150, rough side of sandpaper facing inwards) to avoid egg-laying on the plastic surface rather than the bean seed coat. Data was collected on number of eggs, number of emerged adults and percentage emergence. Genotypes with Oto 15% adult emergence were classified as highly resistant (HR), from 15 to 30% as resistant (R), from 30 to 50% as intermediate (I) and from 50 to 100% as susceptible (S). A replicated, confirmation test was conducted with the 60 best, highly resistant advanced lines as well as the 2 worst, susceptible lines and the check varieties, RAZ44 (resistant) and ICA Pijao (susceptible). Days to emergence and percentage of darnaged seed were measured along with the above pararneters using the same protocol. A total of 4 replicates were used in these trials.DNA extraction. Two DNA extraction techniques were attempted. One was a rapid, highthroughput \"microprep\" method based on alkaline lysis. The other was an ammonium acetate based \"miniprep\". Tissue was harvested in the greenhouse as leaf disks cut with a hole-puncher for the microprep or newly emerging trifoliates for the miniprep. The DNA from the miniprep was found to be more adequate for microsatellite amplifications than the DNA from the microprep so subsequent analysis were done with this techniques.Microsatellite markers. Two rnicrosatellite markers were used for the marker assisted selection scheme: Pv-AG004 (X04660) and Pv-ATCT001 (M68913). Microsatellite amplifications were conducted according to standard PCR protocols. Microsatellite markers were run at 1800 volts, 120 Wats and temperature of 45C for one to two hours on 4% polyacrlamide gels and silver-stained with a recirculating tank system. Alleles were identified as reported in last year's annual report for the 63 parental materials used in multiple crosses to generate the advanced lines tested this year.Additional Tests. In addition to the marker assisted selection screening of the 796 lines, two other tests were conducted: 1) an additional microsatellite evaluation on a blind sample of 102 genotypes for which known arcelin reactions and alleles had already been detennined but for which marker genotype was unknown and 2) a protein assay was conducted to confirm the presence or absence of arcelin in the 64 genotypes selected in for the replicated confirmation test described above.Protein extraction and arcelin determination. 0.15g of bean flour was dissolved in 250 ul of extraction buffer, vortexed and centrifuged 14,000rpm for 15 minutes. The supematant was transferred and mixed with 50ul of cracking buffer, which was vortexed, boiled for 5 minutes, allowed to cool and centrifuged before loading 5 ul onto a stacking polyacrylamide gel. Samples were run ata constant 150 volts until the sample passed into the running gel where a constant 25 mA was maintained. Protein gels were stained for 4 to 5 hours in 120 m1 of 0.25% Coomassie Blue R-250, then transferred to Destaining solutions 1 and n for approximately 4 to 5 hours.The phenotyping results are reported in another section of the CIA T annual report, therefore here we will concentrate on the results of the genotyping that was carried out. Preliminary to the process of marker assisted selection we carried out a parental survey, in which we found the number of alleles and level of polymorphism present for each of the seven microsatellites evaluated. In this parental survey, two microsatellites were found to be more tightly associated with the Arcelin gene: of these the microsatellite Pv-AG004 (X04660) was more polymorphic than Pv-ATCT001 (M68913) presenting 6 alleles versus 2 alleles, respectively. For both markers, unique alleles were found for the parent that provided Arcelin 1 (012882) giving a diagnostic test for this widely used allele of the Arcelin gene. Although this marker produced multiple bands, the pattem of bands produced was diagnostic for the 012882 allele and for resistant genotypes derived from this source, producing bands that were 184, 195 and 207 bp long, while susceptible genotypes had bands that were 207 and 245 or 207 and 285 bp long. Furthermore for Pv-AG004 (X04660) there was also a unique allele for the parent that provided Arcelin 5 (002771) that was different from the Arcelin 1 associated allele. This banding pattem consisted of fragments that were 184, 203 and 207 bp long. Meanwhile, the other marker, Pv-ATCT001 (M68913), could not distinguish between susceptible genotypes and Arcelin 5 containing genotypes. This marker produced single amplification products were the resistant allele of Arcelin 5 was associated with the 190 bp band while the susceptible allele of Arcelin 5 was associated with the 195 an