BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The government may own certain rights in the present invention pursuant to NCI grant RDI CA3 4-465 and NCI grant ROI CA3 4-465. 
    
    
     Reference is made to Applicant&#39;s related applications, Ser. No. 820,517, filed Jan. 7, 1986, Ser. No. 002,890, filed Jan. 13, 1987, Ser. No. 282,126, filed Dec. 9, 1988 and Ser. No. 342,193, filed Apr. 21, 1989. Serial No. 820,517 is now abandoned (as of Apr. 25, 1989). Serial Nos. 282,126 now U.S. Pat. No. 4,988,724 and 342,193 is abandon. Notice of Allowance on Serial No. 002,890 was received Jan. 1, 1989, and the issue fee paid Mar. 27, 1989 is now U.S. Pat. No. 4,859,452. The referenced applications are hereby specifically incorporated by referenced into the present continuation-in-part application. The present application is a continuation-in-part of Applicants&#39; prior Ser. No. 820,517, filed Jan. 17, 1986, on which priority is claimed. 
    
    
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates to improved formulations and methods for the detection of malignant disease in a patient. More particularly, the present invention is directed to formulations which augment tumor related increases in a patient&#39;s polyamine level and which additionally prevent drug related side effects in patients undergoing ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor therapy. 
     The present invention is also directed to formulations which reduce tumor growth rate in a patient. The invention also includes formulations for the protection and/or therapeutic treatment of the intestinal mucosa in the promotion of epithelial growth. 
     2. Description of Relevant Art 
     Polyamines are important in the regulation of protein, RNA and DNA synthesis in mammalian systems and are essential for cell proliferation. The increased excretion of polyamines in the urine of patients with cancer was reported by Russell, D. H. (1971), Nature, 233: 144-145. Based on animal studies of tumor growth and regression, spontaneously and in response to radiation and chemotherapy, a model was proposed by Russell, et al. (1975), Lancet. 2: 797-799, to summarize the potential role of polyamines as biochemical markers of human tumor cell growth and death. Such observations raise the possibility that measurement of polyamine levels in clinical fluids and tissue specimens could be useful in the diagnosis and elevation of patients with cancer. For our review of the diagnostic role of polyamines in cancer, see &#34;Polyamines and the Clinical Elevation of Patients with Cancer&#34;, Chapter 10, in Progress in Cancer Research and Therapy, Raven Press, New York, 1978. 
     Although polyamine measurements in the urine, plasma and whole blood of patients initially held promise as tumor markers, their use for detecting recurrent systemic disease has been limited. This unreliability is due to below clinical sensitivity (high number of false negatives) and specificity (high number of false positives). Despite numerous reports of elevated polyamines in patients with malignant disease, overlapping standard deviations of polyamine levels between cancer and non-cancer patients reduce their sensitivity to accurately detect malignant disease at an early stage. Furthermore, increased polyamine levels have been associated with nonmalignant disease states such as certain inflammatory and infectious diseases. Such unreliability could be removed by the availability of techniques for specifically increasing polyamine levels observed in false positives such as infectious disease patients. Accordingly, techniques for improving the sensitivity and specificity of the polyamine level test as an indicator of malignant disease in man would represent a significant advance in medical science. 
     Nutritional status plays an important role in the clinical management of patients with malignant disease. Warren, S. (1932) Am. J. Med. Sci.: 184: 610, and, more recently, others (DeWys, W. D., Begg. C., Lavin, P. T., et al. (1980) Am. J. Med Sci.: 69: 491-497) have shown that malnutrition can significantly influence the mortality and shorten the survival time of patients with disseminated disease. Furthermore, cancer therapy may be delayed in patients with a compromised nutritional status for fear of reducing oral intake. In 1967, Dudrick, et al. (1968) Surgery, 64: (1969) 134, Ann. Surg., 169: 974 introduced a safe and effective method to parenterally feed patients until gastrointestinal function could be restored. Soon, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was used for patients in many diseased states such as congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract, trauma, inflammatory bowel disease, and liver disease. Fischer, U.S. Pat. No. 3,950,529 (1976). 
     Copeland and Dudrick, (1976) Curr. Probl. Cancer, 1: 3, recognized the potential of parenteral feeding techniques to solve nutritional problems in a cancer population. It was then theorized that if nutritional therapy in conjunction with cancer therapy could improve host nutritional status, then host survival should improve. Also, preliminary uncontrolled studies showed that host tolerance and tumor response to antineoplastic therapy improved when malnourished patients received TPN, advancing the theory that force feeding of nutrients reduced host toxicity and sensitized tumors to chemotherapeutic agents (Isell, B. F., Valdivieso, M., Zaren, H. A., et al. (1978) Cancer Treat Rep., 62: 1139; Lanzotti, V. J., Copeland, E. M. III, George, S. L., et al. (1975) Cancer Treat Rep., 59: 437). 
     In the 1970&#39;s, several prospective randomized trials were conducted to test these theories. These trials involved patients requiring systemic chemotherapy for testicular carcinoma, small cell lung carcinoma, lymphoma, lung adeno carcinoma and colorectal carcinoma (Lanzotti, et al., (1975) Cancer Treat. Rep., 59: 437; Samuels, M. L., et al. (1981) Cancer Treat, Rep., 65: 615-627; popp, M. D., et al., (1981) Cancer Treat. Rep., 65: 129-135; Valdivieso, M., et al., (1981) Cancer Treat Rep., 659 (suppl. 5): 145; Nixon, D. W., et al., (1981) Cancer Treat. Rep., 65 (suppl. 5): 121-128; Jordan, W. M., et al., (1987) Cancer Treat. Rep., 65: 197. The results of these trials showed that TPN did not improve host tolerance to chemotherapy. Furthermore, tumor response rates were independent of host nutritional status. In fact, one report suggests that TPN may have led to earlier patient demise secondary to progressive disease. Nixon, D. W., et al., (1981), Cancer Treat. Rep., 65 (suppl. 5): 121-128). 
     Several early studies in animal-tumor models in the late 1970&#39;s and early in 1980 showed that nutritional therapy (TPN) can result in tumor growth and, in some cases, accelerate growth. Cameron, I. L., (1981), Cancer Treat. Rep., 65 (suppl. 5): 93; Buzby, G. P., Mullen, J. L., Stein, T. P., et al., (1980), Cancer 45: 2940. For some tumors, tumor growth can also occur during host starvation, emphasizing that tumors will obtain their exogenous or endogenous nutrients for their energy needs and biosynthetic pathways, to the host&#39;s demise. (Sauer, L. A., Nagel, W. O. Dauchy, R. T., et al., (1986) Cancer Res., 46: 3469). Therefore, the use of a standard TPN formulation was contraindicated for patients with malignant disease. 
     These preliminary studies, however, did not consider significant biological aspects of host-tumor metabolism, namely the competition of host and tumor tissues for nutrients in devising an appropriate TPN regiment. Accordingly, a formulation which would provide nutritional support to the patient with malignant disease without stimulating tumor growth would significantly advance the currently practiced clinical oncological management of these patients. 
     A serious side effect observed in patients receiving standard parenteral nutritional regimens (TPN) is gut atrophy (Hosomi, et al., (1987), Europ. J. Clin. Invest., 17: 375-385; Grant, et al., (1988), J. Surg. Res., 44: 506-513) and mucosal hypoplasia (Seidel, et al., (1985), An. J. Physiol., 12: G434-G-438). In addition, a considerable number of chemotherapeutic agents have been shown to promote gastroenteritis, resulting in gut atrophy and breakdown of the enteric barrier to common gut fluora. Gut atrophy has also been shown attendant to physiological conditions which prohibit oral nutrient intake by the patient. These conditions include tracheoesophageal fistula, gastroschisis, omphalocele, and iatrogenic duodenal and proximal intestinal fistulas (Warren, S., (1973), Am. J. Med. Sci., 184: 610-615; Dewys, et al., (1980), Am. J. Med., 69: 491-497; Nixon, et al., (1980), Am. J. Med., 68: 683-690; Dudirck, et al., (1972), J. Trama, 10: 542-553). 
     Glutamine has been shown to have a trophic effect on intestinal epithelium (Souba, et al., (I985), J. Parent. Enter. Nutr., 9: 608-617). It has been demonstrated that the addition of glutamine (10-20 g/L) to a TPN solution restores gut epithelium (Op. Sit.). Specifically, recent studies have shown that oral glutamine protected the gut mucosa of rats receiving toxic doses of 5FU or methotrexate. Gultamine has also been shown to present transmucosal migration of bacteria into mesenteric lymph nodes compared to no such movement evident with the glutamine deficient formulas. Additionally, several investigators have shown that glutamine is an important energy substrate for tumors (Chance, et al., (1987), Surgery, 102: 386-394; Quesada, et al., (1988), Cancer Res., 48: 1551-1553; Souba, et al., (1988), J. Surg. Res., 44: 720-726). Souba, et al. suggest that glutamine should be administered orally to achieve regional protection without stimulating tumor growth. However, glutamine has been observed to have poor chemical stability in an aqueous solution. Specifically, the inclusion of glutamine in a TPN solution is limited by its breakdown to glutamic acid+NH 3 . Thus, a glutamine TPN formulation lacks the chemical stability required of a commercial amino acid solution. 
     Other polyamines, such as ornithine and putrescine, have also been considered in the context of nutrient formulations. Standard TPN formulations do not contain ornithine. Low ornithine-containing formulations have been proposed in a variety of nutrient providing formulations. However, none of these formulations have been shown to rejuvenate of mucosal epithelial surfaces. Additionally, the administration of ornithine to cancer-bearing patients has been shown to enhance tumor cell growth (Byus, et al., (1987), Proceedings of AACR, 28: 158-No. 630). For example, the addition of ornithine to the drinking water of tumorous mice was shown to result in a 25% increase in papilloma growth in each tested subject. (Id.). As yet, the effect of ornithine containing formulations on normal cell growth has not been explored. 
     Several commercially available low ornithine containing TPN formulations, which include arginine, have been used solely as a source of nutrition (Azonutril, 25.0 g/L arginine, 3.4 g/L ornithine, Totamine, 2.38 g/L ornithine, 8.0 g/L arginine, Combiplasmal® S-3, 5 0.81g/L ornithine, 3.01 g/L arginine), Amino-plasmal® paed (1.14 g/L ornithine; 2.02 g/L arginine), Aminomel® 10X-E Salvia (2.42 g/L ornithine, 9.66 g/L arginine), Comafusin® llepar (10 g/L L-ornithine-L-aspartate, i.e., 0.5% ornithine and 0.5% aspartic acid). 
     Putrescine has also been studied for its effects on intestinal mucosal growth. (Seidel et al., (1985), Am. J. Physiol., 249: G434-438; Mujumdar et al., (1987), Life Sciences, 41: 961-966). The Seidel studies reveal increased DNA and RNA content and protein present in the ileum of animals receiving formulations containing putrescine concentrations of about 1 micromole. However, no direct evidence was presented which evidenced increased cell growth. Specifically, no morphometric analysis of villi length or crypt depth of the ileum was performed. (Id.) Mujumdar et al. conducted similar studies, and observed increases in colonic DNA and protein content when putrescine was administered at a dose of about 50 micromole/100 gram body weight (Id.). 
     Despite the diversity of available TPN formulations, none have yet been developed which remain chemically stable over commercially feasible periods of time and which act to prevent gut atrophy or rejuvenate compromised mucosal epithelium surfaces. The development of such a formulation would present a significant medical advance in the clinical management of patients who develope or are born with compromised mucosal surfaces. Moreover, such would prove a valuable prophylactic tool in averting the onset of secondary infection, opportunized by the presence of already atrophied mucosal surfaces. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     It is an object of the present invention to provide an amino acid formulation for improving the diagnostic reliability of polyamine level determinations as indicators of malignant disease in man. In particular, amino acid formulations prepared in accordance with the present invention and administered to patients promote a specific elevation in the polyamine level of patients with primary or recurrent malignant disease. The term amino acid, as used herein, is defined to include all amino acid-derived compounds which will effectively provide the free L-amino acid at the intracellular level. For example, peptides are amino acid-derived compounds that, when acted upon by metabolic enzymes, will provide the free amino acid. Similarly, amino acid derivatives, for example, N-acetylated amino acids, are included within the meaning of the term amino acid. 
     Formulations include a pharmacologically acceptable amount of a polyamine precursor in combination with at least one of the amino acids, preferably one of the essential amino acids. Essential amino acids as used herein refer to those found by William Rose and his associates to be essential in that they are not normally metabolically produced by the body. For example, see Rose (1949) Fed. Proc., 8:546 and Rose et al. (1955) J. Biol. Chem., 217:987. Additionally, as used herein, polyamine precursors are defined as those amino acids in the metabolic pathway of urea and polyamine production and include methionine, arginine, ornithine and citrulline. 
     Such formulations may include any non-toxic amount of each of the included amino acids. Therefore, for the purposes of the present invention, a pharmacologically acceptable amount of an included amino acid generally means any level of that amino acid which is at least high enough to supply minimal metabolically sufficient concentrations of that amino acid to the target cells. However, such formulations could presumably incorporate amino acid concentrations which approach toxicity-inducing levels, for example, in an attempt to &#34;tailor&#34; formulations to fit a particular patient population. In a preferred embodiment, the concentration of included amino acids found to promote good polyamine responses exhibited a range from 50 to 200 mg. for tryptophan to 250 to 1400 milligrams for leucine in every 100 milliliters of a parenteral formulation. The preferred range for arginine, ornithine or methionine, the polyamine precursors, is between 50 and 750 mg/100 ml of solution, however, higher concentrations may be employed where desired. In a more preferred embodiment, the concentration of polyamine precursor is approximately 30 mM (which, for example, corresponds to 450 mg. ornithine/100 ml. of the formulation). 
     In another embodiment, the amino acid formulation is conveniently supplied by combining pharmacologically acceptable amounts of ornithine or arginine with commercially available parenteral feeding solutions. Such feeder solutions could prove useful both as parenteral solutions tailored to maximize the sensitivity of detection of recurrent malignant disease and as adjuvants to the cancer-screening of patients who are undergoing parenteral feeding. 
     It is a further object of the present invention to provide methods for detecting cancer in a patient which generally includes administering to the patient one of the parenteral amino acid formulations described and detecting an increase in the patient&#39;s polyamine level following administration of the formulation, a relative increase being indicative of cancer in the patient. Relative increase in polyamine levels is meant to include either relative increases with respect to the cancer patient&#39;s own pre-administration level or with respect to &#34;normal&#34; patient population&#39;s average pre- or post administration polyamine levels. 
     Although the full advantages of the present invention are particularly exemplified through detection of a relative increase in putrescine, measurement of all of the polyamines, including spermidine, spermine and putrescine, is sufficient for most uses. 
     Similarly, although polyamine levels may be determined in any of a number of patient samples, including cerebrospinal fluid, urine, plasma, serum and whole blood, in a preferred embodiment, the patient&#39;s red blood cell (RBC) polyamine levels are measured as a more sensitive indicator of polyamine levels. 
     It is still a further object of the present invention to provide formulations for use in preventing or reducing the occurrence of ODC-related toxicities in patients undergoing ODC therapy. In this regard, it is demonstrated herein that amino acid formulations which are formulated to include a polyamine precursor, preferably ornithine, can reduce or reverse DFMO induced thrombocytopenia. Moreover, it has been found that for such uses, polyamine precursors may be administered either alone or in combination with other amino acids. 
     It is still a further feature of the present invention to provide formulations that reduce tumor growth rate in patients with malignant disease. In this regard, it is demonstrated herein that amino acid formulations which are formulated to decrease or eliminate arginine and which include ornithine can reduce the rate of TPN induced tumor growth. It is further proposed that a formulation which includes citrulline can be used in conjunction with or instead of ornithine to furnish necessary urea cycle substrates. In one preferred embodiment, the final concentration of included arginine is less than about 0.10% by weight where citrulline is present in a non-toxic pharmacologically acceptable concentration. A preferred embodiment of this particular formulation includes citrulline in about a range of 0.01 to 2% by weight final concentration. In another preferred embodiment, the concentration of included arginine was less than about 0.05% by weight of the formulation where ornithine and citrulline are present in a non-toxic pharmacologically acceptable concentration. A preferred embodiment of this particular formulation includes ornithine in a greater than 0.5% by weight final concentration and citrulline in a range of 0.01 to 2% by weight final concentration of the formulation. 
     Another embodiment of the formula does not include citrulline, but does include arginine in a less than about 0.10% by weight final concentration and ornithine in a non-toxic pharmacologically acceptable concentration. A preferred embodiment of this particular formulation includes ornithine in about a 1% by weight final concentration. However, it is postulated that the lower the concentration of arginine in each of the above formulations, the greater the tumor-inhibiting effect will be. 
     In an additional embodiment, the formulation further includes a mixture of essential amino acids and at least one non-essential amino acid. The non-essential amino acid of choice in one such preferred embodiment is alanine, to be included in any non-toxic, pharmacologically acceptable concentration. One particular embodiment of the present invention includes alanine in about a 1% by weight final concentration. These particular preferred embodiments are arginine-free. Such formulations may include any non-toxic, pharmacologically acceptable concentration of each of the included essential amino acids. 
     An additional preferred embodiment of the formulation includes a mixture of essential amino acids in pharmacologically acceptable concentrations, less than about 0.10% arginine by weight final concentration, both ornithine and citrulline at a non-toxic, pharmacologically acceptable concentration, and a mixture of the nonessential amino acids: alanine (200-3500 mg./100 ml); glycine (250-3000 mg./100 ml); proline (100-1500 mg./100 ml) and serine (5-650 mg./100 ml). A pharmacologically acceptable amount of an included amino acid in any of the above formulations generally means any level of that amino acid which is at least high enough to supply minimal metabolically sufficient concentrations of that amino acid to the target cells in the feeding solution, but not so high as to be toxic. For example, concentrations in the range of about 0.01% and 5.0% are for most amino acids considered non-toxic and pharmacologically acceptable. This range applies as well to citrulline and ornithine. Also, it is observed that the lower the concentration of arginine in each of the above formulations, the greater the tumor-inhibiting effect will be. In fact, a less than about 0.10% by weight final weight concentration of arginine is hypothesized to have a greater tumor growth inhibiting effect. A formulation without arginine would provide the most superior tumor growth inhibiting effect of all the presently disclosed formulations. 
     It is a further object of the present invention to provide methods for inhibiting or eliminating tumor growth in a patient with malignant disease, which generally includes administering to the patient one of the amino acid formulations described herein. The mode of administering said formulation is parenterally, however the formulas could be modified so as to allow oral administration. 
     Successful inhibition of tumor growth may be detected through demonstration of relatively increased survival rates of formulation-receiving patients compared to standard TPN receiving patients. Survival data taken from patients undergoing chemotherapy and cancer patients being prepared for surgery suggest that standard TPN support solutions may actually decrease survival rate. However, nutritional support is often times indicated in persons undergoing chemotherapy, as intestinal complications accompanying such treatment make oral feeding difficult. Patients with acute disruption of gastrointestinal functions and those with such disorders awaiting major surgery frequently suffer from a compromised nutritional status. Correction of varying states of malnutrition with a tailored amino acid regimen is hypothesized to constitute both a life-sustaining tactic until intestinal function returns to normal and a beneficial pre-operative practice. A decrease in postoperative complications with shorter recovery times are particular expected benefits of such a pre-operative practice. The relative nutritional status of a patient may be determined by numerous methods well know to those of skill in the art, including measurement of plasma proteins, anthropometric measurements, immunological testing, urine chemistries and body compositional studies. 
     An additional object of the present invention is to provide a process for preparing a formulation that decreases tumor growth rate. In its broadest embodiment, this process comprises the steps of combining non-toxic, pharmacologically acceptable amounts of citrulline with arginine, and adding to this combination a sufficient volume of appropriate liquid medium so as to achieve about a pharmacologically acceptable concentration of citrulline and a less than 0.10% by weight concentration of arginine. In a preferred embodiment, a glucose solution or filtered water is an appropriate liquid medium. It has been found that for such uses, this solution may be administered in combination with other amino acids and ornithine. 
     The present invention also comprises a formulation for the rejuvenation of mucosal surfaces. A preferred embodiment of the proposed formulation contains ornithine (about 0.60%, 6.0 g/L) and arginine (about 1%, 10 g/L) together with a mixture of essential amino acids and at least one non-essential amino acid. The particular amino acids and the range of concentrations thereof are described supra as applied to the preferred levels in the previously described formulations. 
     The formulation of the present invention further provides for a growth-promoting, ornithine TPN formulation. The formulation is preferably a TPN additive. The final ornithine concentration of the additive is between about 5% (55 g/L) to 20.0% (200 g/L). The most preferred final concentration of ornithine additive for a TPN formulation is about 6.5% (65 g/L). These particularly described formulation additives are to be used in conjunction with at least one pharmaceutically acceptable diluent. These pharmaceutically acceptable diluents include glucose solutions, water, saline or other commercially available TPN formulations. The additive is preferably mixed with the pharmaceutically acceptable diluent in a ratio of 1 part additive to 9 parts diluent to form a TPN feeding formulation. The formulation in an additional embodiment further includes arginine. The preferred final arginine concentration of the feeding TPN formulation is about 1% (10 g/L). 
     It has been found that for the nutritional uses described, the formulation may be administered in combination with other amino acids. 
     The additional embodiment of the invention constitutes a pre-mixed, complete feeding formulation comprising ornithine together with an appropriate volume of a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent. Suitable diluents include a glucose solution (5%-70%), distilled water and TRAVESOL®. The most preferred diluent is 10% TRAVESOL®. The final concentration of ornithine in one such preferred embodiment is in the range of between 0.55% (5.5 g/L) to about 2.0% (20 g/L). A more preferred range of ornithine final concentration is between about 0.6% (6 g/L) and 1.5% (15 g/L). The most preferred final concentration of ornithine is 0.65% (6.5 g/L). 
     These patient-ready, pre-mixed ornithine-containing formulations may in an additional embodiment include arginine. The most preferred concentration of arginine is about 1% (10 g/L). It has been found that for such uses, the formulation may be administered in combination with other amino acids. 
     In another preferred embodiment of the complete feeding formulation, ornithine is provided in a mixture of 50% glucose solution and 10% TRAVESOL® (1:1 (v/v)) together with electrolytes, potassium phosphate and multivitamins. Travesol is a solution of amino acids recognized by those of skill in the art of parenteral formulation. The individual amino acids of such a formulation are contained in a concentration of about 1% of the complete formulation. 
     A pharmacologically acceptable amount of an included amino acid in any of the above formulations generally means any level of that amino acid which is at least high enough to supply minimal metabolically sufficient concentrations of that amino acid to the target cells in the feeding solution, but not so high as to be toxic. Discussion made supra as to non-toxic levels of amino acids apply equally at this point. 
     The present application also includes methods of preparing each of the above-referenced formulation additives and complete formulations. In its broadest embodiment, this process comprises the steps of mixing a pharmacologically acceptable amount of ornithine with a sufficient volume of appropriate liquid medium so as to achieve a pharmacologically acceptable concentration of ornithine. This concentration is between about 0.5% (5.0 g/L) and 2.0% (20 g/L) for the feeding formulation, and between about 5.0% and about 20% for the formulation additive. A more preferred ornithine concentration is in the range of between 0.60% (6.0 g/L) and 1.5% (15 g/L), with the most preferred ornithine concentration being about 0.65% (6.5 g/L) in the feeding formulation. The ornithine and diluent are to be stirred until a homogeneous mixture is formed. The pH of the complete formulation is to be adjusted to between about 7.0 and 7.8. The most preferred pH of the complete formulation is about 7.4. 
     It is a further feature of the present invention to provide methods to prevent gut atrophy, as well as methods to rejuvenate already compromised mucosal epithelium surfaces. Methods of averting the onset of secondary infections in patients with compromised epithelial surfaces are also provided herein. Exemplary secondary infections which may be averted with the present formulations include chronic sepsis and neutrophenic septicemia. In general, these methods involve administering the formulation to a patient with compromised mucosa epithelial surfaces for a period of time until improvement of the condition results. Patient improvement may be measured by maintenance or increase in body weight in the treated patient. 
     The present invention possesses the additional feature of providing a therapeutic formulation without the onset of gut atrophy for non-cancer starving patients. Such patients include, for example, trauma victims, patients recovering from non-cancer surgery, and premature neonates. 
     The described formulations may be administered orally or parenterally. However, the most preferred mode of administration is parenteral. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     Table 1. A listing of several parenteral formulations, and their manufacturers, which include the indicated amount of amino acids per every 100 ml. of the formulation. 
     FIG. 1. Graphs demonstrate changes in RBC putrescine, spermidine, and spermine levels in non-cancer patients and patients with clinically occult malignant disease during TPN (total parenteral nutrition) therapy. PRE indicates RBC polyamine levels before preoperative TPN was started, and POST indicates levels after 7-10 days of preoperative TPN but before surgery. N.S. indicates not significant. 
     FIG. 2. Graphs demonstrate changes in RBC putrescine: spermidine and spermine: spermine ratios in non-cancer patients and patients with clinically occult malignant disease during TPN. PRE indicates RBC polyamine ratios before preoperative TPN was started and POST indicates ratios after 7-10 days of preoperative TPN but before surgery. N.S. indicates not significant. 
     FIG. 3. Platelet counts plotted against dose of DFMO given as a continuous i.v. infusion for 12 days in tumor-bearing (O) and non-tumor-bearing rats (o). Bars indicate standard deviation. As the dose of DFMO increases, there is significant platelet suppression. This experiment was done to determine if simultaneous ornithine infusion could block platelet suppression. 
     FIG. 4. Platelet counts plotted against days of continuous i.v. DFMO infusion in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. The upper graph shows the platelet suppression at 6 g DFMO/sq m/d. The lower graph depicts the platelet suppression at 8 g DFMO/sq m/d. Each course of infusion is shown by two points representing day 1 of infusion and day 22 to 28 when DFMO was discontinued. The paired points are connected by a straight line. The data show that platelet suppression is the major limiting host toxicity of DFMO given as a continuous infusion. The simultaneous infusion of ornithine with DMFO may inhibit platelet toxicity. 
     FIG. 5. TPN-induced tumor growth during the plateau phase of colon carcinoma. Fisher 344 rats with 3 g transplantable colon tumors growing s.c. in the R flank were randomized to 2 groups and a central venous catheter was inserted. CHOW received i.v. saline and oral chow ad libitum for 12 days. TPN consisted of 500 ml D50W +500 ml 10% TRAVESOL® (general amino acid solution) and was administered for 12 days to the other group. Note that TPN was administered during the period of time when the tumor was entering the plateau phase of growth. The final tumor weight (after 12 days TPN) for the TPN group was significantly greater than the CHOW final tumor weight (P&lt;0.05). a=P&lt;0.05 compared with CHOW final tumor weight. 
     FIG. 6 (a) and (b). Graphs demonstrate the Gompertzian growth curve of the methylcholanthrene-induced sarcoma (MCA) and the Ward colon carcinoma (WCC) in the Fisher 344 rat. The MCA reaches its growth plateau at 60 grams while WCC reaches its plateau at 9 grams. The plateau phase of growth is related to the solid tumor outgrowing its blood supply and, hence, the reduced availability of O 2  and nutrients. There is no change in tumor growth when TPN is administered during the log phase of MCA growth. Host and MCA growth are significantly reduced when the host is fed a restricted diet. However, MCA growth becomes exponential when TPN is administered after 14 days of restricted diet. 
     FIG. 7. Graph demonstrates the role of arginine in TPN (total parenteral nutrition) induced tumor growth observed in Example VIII. Fisher 344 rats with approximately 3 g transplantable colon tumors growing in the R flank were randomized to four groups and a central venous catheter was inserted. CONTROL received i.v. saline and oral chow ad libitum. The daily intake for these rats was 52±9 cal and 584±104 mg nitrogen. TPN consisted of 500 ml D50+500 ml 10% Travasol. The daily intake of TPN was 54±2 cal and 550±15 mg nitrogen. EAA describes a parenteral regimen consisting of 500 ml D50+500 ml 5.2% Aminess (essential amino acid only). The daily intake of EAA formula was 51±4 cal and 270±10 mg nitrogen. EAA+NEAA describes a parenteral regimen consisting of 500 ml D50+500 ml 5.2% Aminess with non-essential amino acids except arginine. The daily intake of EAA+NEAA formula was 51±5 cal and 574± 15 mg nitrogen. Hence, TPN and EAA±NEAA regimens were isonitrogenous and isocaloric with the only difference being the content of arginine. The parenteral regimens and saline were administered by continuous i.v. infusion for 12 days. This figure shows that TPN resulted in increased tumor growth compared with CONTROL. When EAA was given, no tumor growth was seen. When EAA+NEAA was given, there was a slight increase in tumor weight but much less than TPN. 
     This study suggests that arginine may be important in stimulating tumor growth. Bars indicate standard deviation. Numbers indicate number of animals. a=P&lt;0.05 vs CONTROL; b=P&lt;0.05 vs TPN; c=P&lt;0.05 vs EAA. 
     FIG. 8. Graph demonstrates the role of polyamine precursors in TPN-induced tumor growth observed in Example IX. Approximately 4 g. Ward colon carcinomas were established in Fisher 344 rats that received parenteral therapy. Rats were then randomized to four treatment groups CONTROL (i.v. saline+chow), ALANINE, [(500 ml D50+250 ml. 5.2% EAA+alanine (3.3 mmol/100 ml)], ARGININE [(500 ml D50+250 ml. 5.2% EAA+arginine (3.3 mmol/100 ml), and ORNITHINE [(500 ml D50+250 ml. 5.2% EAA+ornithine. (See Table IX). The regimens were administered by continuous i.v. infusion for 6 days. The results show the percent increase in tumor weight during the 6-day infusion with the bars indicating the standard deviation. The numbers indicate number of rats. * indicates P&lt;0.05 compared with the ARGININE group. CONTROL and ORNITHINE were not significantly different. The data indicate that the arginine in TPN solutions may stimulate tumor growth while ornithine does not. 
     FIG. 9. Graph demonstrates the effect of decreasing arginine concentrations on tumor growth measured in grams. As shown, arginine concentrations as low as 0.1% arginine in the TPN solution may increase tumor growth. 
     FIG. 10. Graph demonstrates the effect of decreasing arginine concentrations on urine ammonia determinations. The saline group had no detectable ammonia in the urine. The reduction of arginine in the TPN solution from 0.65 to 0.1 g./100 ml. resulted in increasing ammonia levels in the urine. Plasma ammonia levels were the same for all groups (data not shown). 
     FIG. 11. Graph demonstrates the effect of ornithine in a parenteral formulation on the villi growth in the jejunum. A control formulation as well as a glutamine and glycine formulation were also examined for their effects on villi length growth in the jejunum. Growth was measured as a function of increase in villi length. 
     FIG. 12. Graph demonstrates the effect of ornithine in a parenteral formulation on the villi growth in the ileum. A control formulation as well as a glutamine and glycine formulation were examined for their effects on villi growth in the ileum. Growth was measured as a function of increase in villi length. 
     FIG. 13. Graph demonstrates the effect of ornithine in a parenteral formulation on plasma ornithine levels. A control formulation as well as a glutamine and glycine formulation were also examined for their effects on plasma ornithine levels. This study was performed to determine the doses of the various additives (ornithine, glutamine, glycines) required to achieve therapeutic levels of circulating ornithine. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     The present invention, in its most general and overall scope, is directed to amino acid formulations, including amino acid formulations which contain the amino acid ornithine, methionine or arginine, useful in the stimulation of polyamine formation in the tumor-bearing individual. Methods are provided which utilize these amino acid formulations to improve the diagnostic reliability of polyamine level determination in cancer screening and cancer staging. Additionally, such formulations provide the capability of reducing toxicities associated with anti-tumor chemotherapy aimed at blocking polyamine production. 
     The present invention is also directed to an amino acid formulation for patients suffering from malignant disease. Additionally, methods are provided which utilize these amino acid formulations to reduce tumor growth rate. A process for preparing the subject amino acid formulations is also revealed. 
     In addition, the present invention includes formulations containing ornithine for the maintenance and/or rejuvenation of mucosal epithelial surfaces. These formulations are provided in the form of a complete premixed formulation as a formulation additive. Methods of maintaining and/or rejuvenating mucosal surfaces are also provided, as well as methods for averting secondary complications in a patient suffering from a compromised mucosal epithelial surface. Methods of preparing each of the described formulations are also included. 
     a. Introduction 
     Polyamine production is associated with cell division. Increases in the intracellular levels of polyamines, particularly putrescine and spermidine, in the early phase of both normal and neoplastic cell proliferation are well documented. Conversely, a reduction in tumor burden is associated with a reduction of polyamine levels suggesting the potential use of polyamines as a biological marker of tumor growth. A substantial portion of circulating polyamines are carried in the RBC. Because the enzyme systems necessary to synthesize polyamines are not found in enucleated RBC, it is theorized that RBC are carriers of polyamines from sites of production to sites of conjugation and excretion. 
     The pathway for polyamine synthesis begins with L-ornithine. This natural amino acid, although not normally incorporated into proteins, is part of the urea cycle which metabolizes arginine to ornithine and ureas. Ornithine is converted by ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) to putrescine and CO 2 , the rate-limiting step in the production of polyamines. Putrescine is converted to spermidine by spermidine synthetase in association with the decarboxylation of S-adenosylmethionine by S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase. Spermidine is then converted to spermine by spermine synthetase, again in association with the decarboxylation of S-adenosylmethionine. Putrescine, spermidine and spermine represent the three primary polyamines. 
     It has been found that infusion of feeding solutions which contain precursors of polyamine metabolism, alter polyamine metabolism in the tumor-bearing host. One example is parenteral nutrition formulations which contain methionine, arginine and/or ornithine. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) formulations are specific feeding solutions which generally contain higher amino acid concentrations than supplementary feeding solutions, for example. TPN is a technique used to intravenously feed malnourished cancer patients. These nutrient solutions generally contain concentrated glucose, crystalline amino acids, electrolytes and vitamins. The amino acid compositions of typical commercially available amino acid solutions are shown in Table 1. Each amino acid is purchased in crystalline form and compounded into amino acid solutions. Unique amino acid solutions are marketed for patients with kidney failure, liver failure and trauma patients. However, no special solutions yet exist for cancer patients. 
     
         TABLE I  AMINO ACID COMPARISON REPRESENTATIVE AMINO ACID PROFILES BY U.S. MANUFACTURERS  TRAVASOL TRAVASOL TRAVASOL TRAVASOL         0.5% WITH 10% WITH 8.5% WITH 10% WITH  TRAVASOL TRAVASOL BANCHA 4% BCAA 4% BCAA 4% BCAA 4% BCAA REMAMIN FREAMIN FREAMINE FREAMINE  8.5% 10% MIN 4% (1) (2) (3) (4) 6.5% 8.5% 10% HBC   ESSENTIAL AMINO ACIDS (mg/100 ml) LEUCINE 526.00 730.00 1380.00 1095.33 1163.33 953.00 1055.00 600.00 770.00 910.00 1870.00 ISOLEUCINE 406.00 600.00 1380.00 1055.33 1120.00 893.00 990.00 500.00 590.00 690.00 760.00 VALINE 390.00 580.00 1240.00 956.67 1020.00 815.00 910.00 820.00 560.00 660.00 880.00 PHENYLALANINE 526.00 560.00 0.00 175.33 186.67 263.00 280.00 490.00 480.00 560.00 320.00 METHIONINE 492.00 400.00 0.00 164.00 193.33 246.00 200.00 500.00 450.00 530.00 250.00 LYSINE 492.00 580.00 0.00 164.00 193.33 246.00 290.00 450.00 620.00 750.00 410.00 HISTIDINE 372.00 480.00 0.00 124.00 160.00 186.00 240.00 420.00 240.00 280.00 160.00 THREONINE 356.00 420.00 0.00 118.67 140.00 178.00 210.00 380.00 340.00 400.00 200.00 TRYPTOPHAN 152.00 180.00 0.00 50.67 60.00 76.00 90.00 160.00 130.00 150.00 90.00 NON-ESSENTIAL AMINE ACIDS (mg/100 ml) ALANINE 1760.00 2070.00 0.00 586.67 690.00 880.00 1035.00 560.00 600.00 710.00 400.00 GLYCINE 1760.00 1030.00 0.00 586.67 343.33 880.00 515.00 300.00 1190.00 1408.00 330.00 ANGININE 880.00 1150.00 0.00 293.38 383.38 440.00 575.00 630.00 810.00 950.00 580.00 PROLINE 856.00 680.00 0.00 118.67 226.67 178.00 340.00 350.00 1120.00 630.00 630.00 TYROSINE 34.00 40.00 0.00 11.33 13.33 17.00 20.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SERINE 0.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 166.67 0.00 250.00 300.00 500.00 590.00 330.00 CYSTEINE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 AMINO ACIDS AS % 8.50 10.00 4.00 5.50 6.00 6.25 7.00 6.50 8.42 9.23 6.73 BCAA (g/100 ml) 1.32 1.91 4.00 3.11 3.30 2.66 2.96 1.92 1.92 2.26 3.01 BCAA % 15.55 19.10 100.00 56.49 55.06 42.57 42.21 29.54 22.80 24.49 44.73 EAA % 37.12 43.30 100.00 39.04 41.77 38.56 42.65 43.20 41.80 49.30 44.40 BCAA:AAA Ratio 1.0:0.5391.0:0.408 N/A 1.0:.076 1.0:.079 1.0:.134 1.0:.132 1.0:.359 1.0:0.318 1.0:0.3141.0:.136 Manufacturer Travenol Travenol Travenol Travenol Travenol Travenol Travenol Travenol Amer. Amer. Amer.          McGraw McGraw McGraw    FREAMINE HCC NEPHRAMINE 5.4% HEPTAMINE 8% PROCALAMINE AMINOSYN 8.5% AMINOSYN 10% AMINOSYN RF   ESSENTIAL AMINO ACIDS (mg/100 ml) LEUCINE 1370.00 980.00 1100.00 270.00 810.00 940.00 726.00 ISOLEUCINE 760.00 560.00 900.00 210.00 620.00 720.00 462.00 VALINE 880.00 640.00 840.00 200.00 680.00 800.00 528.00 PHENYLALANINE 320.00 880.00 100.00 170.00 380.00 440.00 726.00 METHIONINE 250.00 880.00 100.00 160.00 340.00 400.00 726.00 LYSINE 410.00 640.00 610.00 220.00 624.00 720.00 535.00 HISTIDINE 160.00 250.00 240.00 85.00 260.00 300.00 429.00 THREONINE 200.00 400.00 450.00 120.00 460.00 520.00 330.00 TRYPTOPHAN 90.00 200.00 66.00 46.00 150.00 160.00 165.00 NON-ESSENTIAL AMINE ACIDS (mg/100 ml) ALANINE 400.00 0.00 770.00 210.00 1100.00 1200.00 0.00 GLYCINE 330.00 0.00 900.00 420.00 1100.00 1280.00 0.00 ANGININE 580.00 0.00 600.00 290.00 850.00 980.00 600.00 PROLINE 630.00 0.00 800.00 340.00 750.00 860.00 0.00 TYROSINE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.00 44.00 0.00 SERINE 330.00 0.00 500.00 180.00 370.00 428.00 0.00 CYSTEINE 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMINO ACIDS AS % 6.73 3.35 8.00 2.94 8.54 9.86 5.23 BCAA (g/100 ml) 3.01 2.08 2.84 0.68 2.11 2.46 1.72 BCAA % 44.73 38.08 35.52 23.12 24.71 24.94 32.83 EAA % 44.40 53.30 44.06 14.81 43.24 50.00 46.27 BCAA:AAA Ratio 1.0:.136 1.0:.519 1.0:.058 1.0:.318 1.0:.272 1.0:.262 1.0:.519 Manufacturer Amer. McGraw Amer. McGraw Amer. McGraw Amer. McGraw Abbott Abbott Abbott FOOTNOTES (1) 2 VOLUMES OF 4% BRANCHAMIN TO 1 VOLUME: 8.51 TRAVASOL (2) 2 VOLUMES OF 4% BRANCHAMIN TO 1 VOLUME 10% TRAVASOL (3) 1:1 RATIO 4% BRACHEMIN TO 8.5% TRAVASOL (4) 1:1 RATIO 4% BRACHAMIN TO 10% TRAVASOL 
    
     Studies have shown that the polyamine biosynthetic pathways may be important in the development of amino acid solutions specific for cancer patients. An important consideration is the interaction between tumor polyamine production and a specific amino acid solution that may enhance RBC polyamines as tumor markers. It has been determined that administration of TPN solutions to patients with occult malignancies produce changes in polyamine levels compared with non-cancer patients while plasma CEA and creatine kinase-brain band levels did not change, indicating a specific increase in polyamine levels in tumor-bearing patients. Accordingly, the sensitivity and specificity of RBC polyamine measurements to detect occult disease may be enhanced with new amino acid solutions which include substrates for tumor polyamine production such as ornithine or arginine. 
     An additional important consideration in polyamine metabolism is the interaction between tumor polyamine utilization and specific amino acid solutions. It has been determined that administration of standard TPN solutions, which typically contain arginine, actually increase the rate of tumor growth while formulations with decreased standard arginine concentrations result in decreased tumor growth. It is hypothesized this data indicates arginine may act to promote tumor growth. Accordingly, the growth rate of tumors may be reduced with new amino acid solutions which decrease or eliminate this arginine substrate hypothesized to be utilized in tumor polyamine metabolism. 
     In recent years, chemotherapeutic agents that directly inhibit polyamine synthesis have been developed. Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), one such drug, is an irreversible inhibitor of ODC and potentially can be given continuously with significant anti-tumor effects. This drug is relatively non-toxic to the host while producing inhibition of putrescine synthesis in tumors. Studies in a rat-tumor model demonstrate that DFMO infusion can produce a 90% decrease in tumor putrescine levels without suppressing peripheral platelet counts. 
     Although DFMO can effectively block tumor putrescine biosynthesis, the resultant anti-tumor effect is cytostasis and not cytotoxicity. For example, DFMO reduces the growth rate of an MCA sarcoma but does not produce tumor regression. This finding is consistent with reports of other investigators who showed that DFMO is a cytostatic agent. However, studies indicate that a significant role exists for DFMO agents, permitting the future development of combination chemotherapeutic regimens which incorporate DFMO. 
     Although the toxicity associated with DFMO therapy is not, in general, as severe as other types of chemotherapy, in limited clinical trials it has been found to promote a dose-related thrombocytopenia. Moreover, studies in rats have shown that continuous infusion of DFMO for 12 days significantly reduces platelet counts compared with controls. Other investigations have made similar observations in which thrombocytopenia is the major toxicity of continuous i.v. DFMO therapy. These findings suggest that DFMO may significantly inhibit ODC activity of the bone marrow precursors of megakaryocytes. It is contemplated by the present inventors that the formulations disclosed herein, in addition to promoting tumor polyamine production for diagnostic purposes, constitute specific antidotes to ODC-directed chemotherapy. 
     One means to reverse DFMO toxicity in the host is to infuse amino acid precursors of polyamine biosynthesis. Special amino acid solutions rich in ornithine or arginine made in accordance with the present invention can rescue the bone marrow from the toxic side effects of DFMO. For example, the addition of ornithine to feeder solutions in a rat-tumor model resulted in a significant reversal in the platelet suppression. Additionally, the constant infusion DFMO technology in a rat-tumor model permits the ability to test such new amino acid solutions in reducing DFMO induced thrombocytopenia. It is hypothesized that such solutions provide substrates which stimulate the production of polyamines in normal cells which are sensitive to ODC-directed chemotherapy, thus promoting recovery from toxic side effects of the drugs. Similarly, it is hypothesized that solutions containing polyamine precursors may serve to enhance ODC-directed chemotherapy against certain tumors, as adjusts to radiation therapy or may in themselves exhibit anti-tumor activity against some tumors. 
     Solutions prepared with essential amino acids+ornithine produce higher RBC putrescine levels compared with essential amino acids or essential amino acids+arginine. RBC and tumor spermidine and spermine levels are not affected to as great an extent by these solutions. The specific increases in putrescine levels may be explained by the proximity of certain amino acid components to the pathways of polyamine synthesis. Use of these new amino acid solutions could be important to detect occult malignancy following surgical resection. For example, colorectal carcinoma patients represent an ideal population to test the tumor-detecting capabilities of RBC polyamine levels enhanced by amino acid solutions. Such detection studies could be done, for example, two to three months postoperatively. 
     Use of a new amino acid solution to enhance the cancer detecting properties of blood polyamine measurements represents an improvement of currently available diagnostic methods. Breast and colorectal cancers represent possible malignancies where this may be applicable. Pathologic assessment of axillary lymph node involvement is the only means to predict risk of future metastatic disease in women with either clinical stage I or II disease. By increasing our ability to select patients with positive lymph node involvement, the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy will be increased. Similar application can be made for patients with Dukes B 2  or C 2  rectal carcinomas. CEA measurements or diagnostic radiologic tests are not effective for selecting those patients with microscopic residual disease that can be treated by postoperative radiotherapy to the pelvis. Amino acid solutions with a novel amino acid such as ornithine could enhance polyamine detection of residual disease and, thereby, select patients who would benefit the most from postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. 
     Enhanced cancer detection with polyamine measurements after TPN administration potentially represents considerable improvement over other tumor markers. Infusion of amino acid solutions rich in ornithine increase tumor polyamine production, thus elevating their levels in peripheral blood. Infusion of arginine or ornithine alone, that is, not in combination with one or all of the essential amino acids, has not produced elevated blood polyamine levels in the experimental tumor system. 
     Nutrient modulation to promote growth at cellular surfaces has been shown to be linked to cell polyamine availability. It has been determined that polyamine biosynthesis is essential for cell growth and proliferation (Pegg, A. E. (1988), Cancer Res., 48: 759-774). It has further been reported that ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), the enzyme which metabolizes ornithine to arginase, was higher in maturing intestinal epithelial cells of the non-proliferating villi tip of rat small intestine mucosa compared to the proliferating crypt region of that tissue, (Baylin, et al., (1978), Bio. Chem. Biophys. Aca., 541: 415-419). 
     In particular, newborn rat epithelial cells were shown to exhibit an increase of intestinal ODC activities and polyamine levels during maturation (Luk, et al., (1980), Science, 210: 195-198). In other studies, mucosal cell loss resulting from chemotherapeutic treatment with arabinosylcytosine (ara-C) was found to result in increased polyamine biosynthesis during intestinal recovery. (Luk, et al., (1980), Science, 210: 195-198). Additionally, intestinal adaptation to short gut has been found to be related to increased ODC activity (Luk, et al., (1984), J. Clin. Invest., 74: 698-704; Hosami, et al., (1987), Europ. J. Clin. Invest , 17: 375-385). 
     Other investigators have shown that intraluminal infusion of the polyamine putrescine, results in stimulation of mucosal proliferation (Seidel, et al., (1985), Am. J. Physiol., 249: G434-438). Gastrin has been found to have similar effects (Seidel, et al., (I985), Am. J. Physiol., 249: G16-20). This data suggest polyamine synthesis is important in the maturation and rejuvenation of intestinal epithelial cells. However, available amino acid formulations for the maintenance and/or rejuvenation of mucosal surfaces, such as those containing glutamine, are chemically unstable and thus have limited commercial applicability owing to the short shelf life of glutamine in solution. Thus, the development of a formulation which did not result in gut atrophy and which maintained and/or rejuvenated compromised mucosal epithelial cell surfaces which was also chemically stable in solution would provide for the nutritional support of a large segment of the world population. 
     b. Determination of Polyamine Levels 
     Numerous techniques are known in the art for determining polyamine levels in aqueous biological samples such as urine and plasma. Generally, such techniques involve subjecting the aqueous sample to amino acid analysis by an automated amino acid analysis. In this manner, individual determinations of putrescine, spermidine and spermine may be made. More recently, enzymatic methods have been developed as disclosed in Japanese patents 8402700 and 8482099. 
     Although urine and plasma may be utilized for polyamine determinations in accordance with the present invention, it has been determined by the present inventors that red blood cell polyamine levels more accurately reflect tumor-related increases in polyamine production. Therefore, determination of RBC polyamines is a preferred method where accuracy is required, although this procedure is somewhat more involved. The following method is a representative RBC polyamine level determination. 
     After obtaining the blood sample by venipuncture, or some other suitable means, blood hematocrit is determined and the blood is centrifuged for 10 minutes at 500 g. The plasma is removed for albumin determination and the remaining cells are washed with an equal volume of cold 0.9% NaCl and centrifuged at 200 g for 15 minutes. The buffy coat is then carefully aspirated along with the supernatant and discarded. After thoroughly mixing the packed RBC, a 1.0 ml aliquot is extracted for polyamine analysis. While shaking continuously with a Vortex mixer, 2.5 ml of freshly prepared 6% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) is added followed by 60 ul of 100% TCA. This is done to avoid insufficient mixing if 100% TCA is added directly to RBC. The samples are mixed thoroughly for a minimum of 3 minutes and frozen at -70° C. if further extraction steps are performed. The samples are thawed and centrifuged at 200×g for 15 minutes. The supernatant is then transferred to tubes containing  40 ul of concentrated HCl. The samples are washed twice with anhydrous ether and dried. The pellets are dissolved in 100 ul of 0.5 N HCl and centrifuged at 200 g. The clear supernatant is then analyzed for polyamines using, for example, a Durrum D-500 amino acid analyzer. 
     In an additional embodiment, the patient&#39;s RBC polyamine level is determined both before and after administration of amino acid solutions. This allows the physician to both identify the &#34;reactivity&#34; of the patient&#39;s polyamine level and to further compare with normal profiles. The following example demonstrates the use of total parenteral nutrition solutions to detect recurrent malignant disease. 
     EXAMPLE I 
     Detection of Recurrent Malignant Disease By Polyamine Analysis in Patients Receiving Total Parenteral Nutrition 
     This study was performed to demonstrate that total parenteral nutrition (TPN) results in significant increases in erythrocyte (RBC) polyamine levels in patients with clinically occult recurrent malignant disease. TPN was administered preoperatively to six noncancer patients and seven patients who had a history of curative operation for malignant disease and, after receiving TPN, were found to have recurrent disease. RBC putrescine (PUT), spermidine (SPD), and spermine (SPM) were determined before and after preoperative TPN in each patient. Plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and creatine kinase brain band (CK-BB) were also measured during the study as controls. Mean length (±S.E.) of preoperative TPN for the noncancer group and the group harboring occult recurrent disease was 8.4±2.9 days and 9.6±3.6 days, respectively. There were no significant changes in RBC polyamine and plasma CEA and CK-BB levels in the noncancer group after TPN. Those patients with occult malignant disease had significant increases in RBC PUT and PUT/SPD ratio (p 0.05) during TPN, while RBC SPD and SPM and plasma CEA and CK-BB did not change. The data indicates that short-term TPN can enhance the use of polyamine measurements as markers of recurrent malignant disease. 
     Patient Population 
     Patients who required preoperative TPN in order to restore or prevent nutritional deficits before an operative procedure were entered into this study. Patients who received chemotherapy or radiation therapy or underwent an operative procedure within three months of this study were excluded. Women with active ovulatory cycles were also excluded. The only treatment given during preoperative TPN was nutritional therapy. All patients had normal renal function (plasma creatinine less than 1.4 mg/dL and BUN values less than 25 mg/dL) and normal liver function (serum bilirubin less than 1.4 mg/dL) as prerequisites for entry into the study. This study was conducted with the approval of the Human Surveillance Committee of M. D. Anderson Hospital and the informed consent of the patient. 
     There were six patients who required preoperative TPN and who were free of malignant disease, as documented by exploratory laparotomy, histologic evaluation of the respected specimens, and length of disease-free status (greater than five years). There were seven patients with clinically occult recurrent malignant disease during their course of preoperative TPN. These patients had had either a &#34;curative&#34; operative procedure or had a suspicious lesion that could not be proven as recurrent malignant disease by diagnostic evaluation, which included roentgenographic and endoscopic studies. Disease status was determined by exploratory laparotomy following preoperative TPN or by follow-up clinic visits. 
     Nutritional Regimen 
     TPN solutions consisted of 50% glucose (500 ml), 10% crystalline amino acids (500 ml), NaCl (40-60 mEq/L), KCl (20-40 mEq/L), KH 2  PO 4  (10-15 mEq/L), Ca gluconate (4.5 mEq/L), MgSO 4  (10-15 mEq/L), MVI-12 (10 ml), and trace elements (2 ml). A 10% soybean oil emulsion (500 ml) was administered biweekly. TPN solutions were administered continuously through a central venous catheter at a rate of 30-50 calories/kg body weight/day and 2.0-3.0 g amino acid/kg body weight/day. Fluid and electrolyte balance was monitored every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. 
     Study Design 
     Each patient was hospitalized for 7 to 10 days of preoperative TPN. Before TPN was started, venous blood (7 ml in a heparin-coated tube) was obtained. After completion of preoperative TPN and on the day before the operative procedure, a second venous blood sample was obtained. RBC polyamine determinations and plasma CEA and CKBB measurements were done before and after preoperative TPN for each patient. In this manner, each patient served as his or her own control in determining the effect of TPN on RBC polyamines and plasma CEA and CK-BB levels. Analysis of data was done by a paired Student&#39;s t-test, comparing levels before and after TPN within the noncancer and cancer groups. 
     Polyamine, CEA and CK-BB Determinations 
     RBC putrescine, spermidine, and spermine levels were measured by high performance liquid chromatography using a Durrum D-500 amino acid analyzer, (Dionex Corp., Palo Alto, Calif.) as described above. Plasma CEA was determined by an enzyme immunoassay procedure kit (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.) and plasma CK-BB was measured with a radioimmunoassay method (Mallinkrodt, Inc., St. Louis, Mo.). 
     The clinical history of each patient is shown in Table II. The six noncancer patients received preoperative TPN for 8.4±2.9 days (mean±S.E.). patients #4 and #5 were both studied twice, six and twelve months apart, because of two separate episodes of weight loss induced by short gut syndrome. This accounts for the eight determinations of sequential polyamine measurements for this group. There were seven patients with clinically occult malignant disease. Three patients had recurrent disease at laparotomy immediately following preoperative TPN. The other four patients developed recurrent disease at three months to two years after the study. The mean length of TPN for this group was 9.6±3.6 days. Mean weight loss, based on usual body weight, was 7.1±1.1% TPN was started. Preoperative TPN was given without infectious or metabolic complications. 
     
                       TABLE II______________________________________Patient PopulationAge   Sex     Diagnosis______________________________________Patients with Occult Malignant Disease59    F       Recurrent bladder carcinoma 9 mos.         after TPN58    F       Recurrent esophageal carcinoma 3 mos.         after TPN49    M       Recurrent pancreatic carcinoma 7 mos.         after TPN60    M       Recurrent esophageal carcinoma discovered         at laparotomy40    M       Recurrent esophageal carcinoma discovered         at laparotomy48    F       Gastric carcinoma discovered at laparotomy78    F       Recurrent colon carcinoma 24 mos. after TPNPatients with Benign Disorders50    F       Benign esophageal stricture55    F       Benign gastric ulcer30    F       Pseudointestinal obstruction20    F       Chronic radiation enteritis and short gut         syndrome51    M       Chronic radiation enteritis and short gut         syndrome71    F       Benign gastric ulcer______________________________________ *patients were studied twice for a total of eight sequential polyamine studies for the noncancer group. 
    
     Polyamines could not be detected in TPN solutions. Changes in RBC count (×10 6  /mm 3 ) were similar for both groups with a mean decrease of 4.3% during TPN. FIG. 1 shows the changes in RBC putrescine, spermidine, and spermine for both groups. Eight determinations in six noncancer patients showed no significant increases in RBC polyamine levels during TPN. The patients with clinically occult malignant disease had a significant increase in RBC putrescine levels (p&lt;0.01), while RBC spermine levels increased but not significantly. There was a trend toward higher, but not significant, spermidine levels in this group (p&lt;0.07). 
     Changes in RBC putrescine: spermidine and spermidine: spermine ratios during TPN for both groups are shown in FIG. 2. The spermidine: spermine ratio did not change for either group. The patients with clinically occult malignant disease had a significant increase in the putrescine: spermidine ratio, while the noncancer group did not. Plasma CEA and CK-BB levels did not increase significantly during TPN in either group of patients as shown in Table III. 
     
                       TABLE III______________________________________Plasma CEA and CKBB Data During TPN.sup.a                 Plasma    Plasma CEA (ng/ml).sup.b                 CKBB (ng/ml).sup.b  n   Pre       Post     Pre     Post______________________________________Noncancer    6     2.9 ± 1.6                    2.8 ± 1.4                           3.6 ± 2.1                                   3.5 ± 2.4Occult   4     2.4 ± 2.0                    5.0 ± 4.9                           1.9 ± 0.5                                   1.6 ± 0.3Cancer______________________________________ .sup.a Plasma carcinomembryonic antigen (CEA) and creatine kinase brain band (CKBB) were determined before (Pre) and after (Post) preoperative TP in noncancer patients and patients with clinically occult malignant disease. Normal values for CEA are 0-3 ng/ml (nonsmokers) and 0-6 ng/ml (Smokers). .sup.b Values represent ± SD 
    
     The previous example demonstrates that two procedures may enhance the value of polyamines as markers of recurrent malignant disease. First, using each patient as his or her own control, polyamine measurements were determined at two different time points. Second, in between the two measurements, a hypertonic glucose-amino acid solution was infused. The combination of these two procedures seemed to enhance the detection of malignant disease with polyamine measurements. 
     Increases in RBC putrescine during TPN are thus related to either increased substrate levels with constant tumor ODC activity or increased tumor ODC activity and subsequent proliferation. In addition it appears that increases in RBC polyamines during TPN in cancer patients are related to tumor proliferation. 
     An important concept of polyamine metabolism is that tumors may have a greater requirement for polyamine synthesis, whereas normal tissues may have a lesser requirement for polyamines because of their controlled growth behavior. By providing nutrient substrates, TPN may be increasing polyamine production in tumor cells that then excrete these products into the extracellular space and are absorbed by RBC. 
     In particular, the TPN solution utilized in the previous example was TRAVESOL® 10%, whose amino acid composition is displayed in Table 1. TRAVESOL® 10% is used in compounding a feeding solution for general administration in patients with benign or malignant diseases. However, the present inventors contemplate that any of the commercially available parenteral amino acid formulations will function in the practice of the present invention. In fact, amino acid formulations may be designed which include a wide range of amino acid concentrations and combinations. For example, parenteral solutions with up to three times the amino acid concentration of commercial TPN solutions would not be considered toxic and would therefore be functional in the present invention. It appears that the only requirement for practicing the present invention is that such solutions contain one or more of the essential amino acids and either ornithine or arginine, or both, with ornithine being preferred. 
     EXAMPLE II 
     Feeding Solutions Containing Ornithine 
     Ornithine has been combined with essential amino acids and utilized in a rat tumor model to demonstrate its potential utility in man. Rats having been implanted with a methylcholanthrene (MCA) - induced tumors received continuous infusion of one-fold diluted Nephramine 5.4% in combination with either arginine or ornithine. Polyamine levels were determined both before and after feeder solutions infusion in control no arginine or ornithine experimental (tumor-bearing rats given solutions with ornithine or arginine) and sham or chow-fed rats. 
     Male Fisher 344 rats were purchased from Timco Harlan-Sprague-Dawley (Houston, Tex.). All rats were allowed a 7-day acclimation period with chow (Purina 5001) and water ad libitum. A methylcholanthrene-induced fibrosarcoma (0.17 g) was implanted as a brei into the right flank under anesthesia and the animals were fed a chow diet for 21 days. When the tumors were at least 1.0 cm in width, two-dimensional measurements with calipers were instituted and the equation, length (cm)×(width [cm]) 2  ×1/2=grams of tumor tissue, was used to estimate tumor weight. When tumor weight reached 14±3 g (21 days of chow diet), the animals were randomized into three groups by tumor weight and under anesthesia a Silastic central venous catheter was placed in the superior vena cava through an internal jugular vein cutdown. The animals were then allowed to recover overnight and continuous infusions were started the next morning. Essential amino acids+arginine rats (E+A rats) received a continuous infusion of 500 ml 60% glucose+500 ml 5.4% Nephramine with 0.58 g/100 ml or arginine added for 6 days. Essential amino acids+ornithine rats (E+O rats) received 500 ml 60% glucose+500 ml 5.4% Nephramine with 0.44 g/100 ml of ornithine added. The ornithine and arginine were added at equimolar concentrations. Nephramine is a parenteral amino acid solution consisting of eight essential amino acids and histidine. After 6 days of continuous infusion, the animals were sacrificed by aortic bleeding. Liver and tumor were excised and weighed and kept frozen at -70° C. until assays were done. Only viable, nonnecrotic tumor tissue was saved and assayed. 
     Preparation of tumor tissue for polyamine assay was done in the following manner. Tumor tissue weighing 0.5 to 1.5 g was cut into small pieces and put into a disposable tube (16×100 mm). Ice-cold 4% sulfosalicylic acid was then added at 2 ml/g wet tissue. This mixture was homogenized in an ice bath for 40 seconds using the Brinkman Polytron homogenizer (P10ST generator set at 8.5). The suspension was centrifuged at 100,000 g for 30 minutes and the resulting clear supernatant was analyzed for polyamines on a Durrum D-500 amino acid analyzer. 
     Statistical analyses were done with Student&#39;s t test (one tail). RBC determinations were performed as described above; blood was obtained by aortic puncture. 
     The results are demonstrated in Table IV. As Table IV indicates, levels of putrescine within the tumors were increased approximately three fold whereas levels of all three polyamines were significantly increased in the rat&#39;s RBC&#39;s. In both cases, ornithine functioned better than arginine, but both appeared to promote an increase in tumor-related levels. Comparison of these valves from tumor-bearing rats to non-tumor bearing would demonstrate an even more substantial difference in relative polyamine levels. 
     
                       TABLE IV______________________________________Nutritional Tumor Weight.sup.1Regimen.sup.1    n      Initial    Final    % Change.sup.2______________________________________Chow     5      13.3 ± 2.6                      32.9 ± 5.3                               134 ± 32E        4      14.0 ± 2.8                      35.7 ± 6.9                               135 ± 42E + A    6      10.5 ± 2.2                      25.7 ± 3.4                               153 ± 68E + O    7      11.1 ± 2.2                      24.4 ± 4.9                               123 ± 34______________________________________Nutritional    Polyamine LevelsTissue Regimen   n     Putrescine                          Spermidine                                  Spermine______________________________________Erythro-  Chow      5     0.91 ± 0.21                           71 ± 57                                   6.1 ± 4.1cyte   E         4     1.42 ± 0.32                          NA      NA  E + A     6     1.60 ± 1.52                           69 ± 45                                   6.5 ± 2.6  E + O     7     1.85 ± 0.36                          125 ± 9                                  10.9 ± 3.3Tumor  Chow      5     46.9 ± 12.2                          797 ± 80                                  392 ± 21  E         4     22.9 ± 4.4                          901 ± 39                                  480 ± 35  E + A     6     50.5 ± 13.3                          871 ± 69                                  409 ± 36  E + O     7     73.6 ± 17.1                          919 ± 90                                  415 ± 30______________________________________ .sup.1 Fibrosarcoma, growing s.c. .sup.2 % increase in tumor weight. 
    
     Additionally, the previous example demonstrates that 450 mg of ornithine for every 100 ml of the amino acid formulation functions satisfactorily and continuous infusion of such solutions which posed no toxicity problems. It is contemplated that amino acid solutions ranging from 50 mg up to 2 g per 100 ml of solutions (with between 50 and 750 mg/100 ml being a preferred range for arginine and ornithine) should function satisfactorily without loss of appreciable activity or increased toxicity. However, for the detection of microscopic tumors and as an antidote to ODC-directed antitumor therapy, higher concentrations of ornithine are suggested. 
     Another experiment which utilized formulations containing amino acid precursors of RBC polyamines, compared the response of tumor-bearing rats (TB) to non tumor-bearing rats (NTB). The study was performed basically in the manner described above with the following indicated differences. Fibrosarcoma-bearing (TB) and non-tumor being F344 rats (NTB) were infused with either a typical feeding solution (30% glucose+5% essential amino acids), with essential amino acids (19 g/L, 30% glucose) plus arginine at 19.5% g/l (E+A). Chow rats (C) were fed chow with no i.v. infusion. 
     
                                           TABLE V__________________________________________________________________________Treatment N    NTB PUT            N WT. PUT  N TB WT                              PUT__________________________________________________________________________C     13   .39 ± .10            5 13 ± 3                   .7 ± 10                       6 37 ± 10                              1.2 ± 0.2E     9    .41 ± .07            6 15 ± 2                  .9 ± .3                       4 36 ± 7                              1.4 ± 0.3E + A 5    .62 ± .22            8 11 ± 3                  1.9 ± .32     51 ± 22      5.0 ± 2.7__________________________________________________________________________ 
    
     Where N is the number of rats included in the study, PUT is RBC levels (nm/g/ml, means±SD) of putrescine determined by HPLC. 
     As demonstrated in Table IV, the increase in RBC putrescine levels in NTB rats following administration of feeding solutions which included a specific putrescine precursor (arginine) was significantly greater (p&lt;0.05) than those receiving chow or essential amino acids only. However, the RBC putrescine level of TB rats receiving E+A was significantly greater than any other group in the study. It should also be noted that increased putrescine levels were found to be proportional to tumor weight. 
     c. Reduction of DFMO Induced Thrombocytopenia 
     Animal and clinical studies have shown that the major host toxicity associated with the continuous infusion of DFMO is thrombocytopenia (Ota et al. (1986), Int. J. Cancer, 38:245; see also FIG. 3 herein). In the above described rat model, a continuous infusion of DFMO was given through a central venous catheter. Non-tumor-bearing and tumor-bearing rats received continuous i.v. DFMO for 12 days. The DFMO doses typically employed were 500 mg, 1000 mg, and 2000 mg per kg body wt per day. Although there was histological evidence of small intestinal mucosal atrophy at these doses, no significant clinical toxicity was seen during the 12 day study. However, dose related thyrombocytopenia was observed, as shown in FIG. 3. White cell count and hematocrit changes were not significantly altered by DFMO administration. 
     Clinical studies with patients undergoing DFMO therapy have shown that the continuous infusion of DFMO for 28 days also produced significant clinical thrombocytopenia. Eleven cycles of 28 day DFMO infusion have been administered to 7 patients at doses of either 6 or 8 g DFMO/m 2  /day. As shown in FIG. 4, the platelet suppression was significant at both doses. There was significantly greater platelet suppression at the 8 g dose as compared with the 6 g dose. Significant suppression of the hematocrit was also noted with a trend toward dose related suppression. White cell count was not affected by either dose. There was no incidence of nausea, vomiting or diarrhea. There were two patients who experienced decreased hearing acuity at 8 h DFMO/m 2  /day. All toxicities resolved spontaneously within two weeks of discontinuing the DFMO infusion. 
     The following study was designed to determine if the simultaneous administration of ornithine with DFMO would reduce thrombocytopenia. Central venous catheters were inserted into Fisher 344 male rats. The animals received approximately 1500 mg DFMO per kg body wt per day as a continuous i.v. infusion. Ornithine HCl (Ajinomoto, Ltd., New York, N.Y.) was added to the saline solutions at a final concentration of 3.3 mmol/100 ml. This concentration is equimolar to the arginine concentration in 10% TRAVESOL®. After 12 days of infusion the rats were sacrificed and platelet counts were determined in peripheral blood. 
     Table VI shows the results of this experiment. There were 3 treatment groups consisting of saline, DFMO and DFMO with ornithine. As shown in Table VI, the simultaneous administration of ornithine with DFMO blocked platelet suppression. DFMO alone resulted in a significant decrease in platelet count as compared with the saline treatment. 
     
                       TABLE VI______________________________________Influence of Ornithine Co-administration On DFMO-InducedThrombocytopenia in the RatTreatment     n     Platelets (× 10.sup.3 /cu. mm)______________________________________Saline        3     780 ± 253DFMO.sup.b    5     409 ± 127DFMO + Orn.sup.c         6     .sup. 958 ± 195.sup.d______________________________________ .sup.a Fischer 344 male rats received a continuous infusion of saline, DFMO or DFMO + ornithine for 12 days. All rats received chow and water ad libitum. .sup.b DFMO dose = 1444 ± 73 mg/kg/d. .sup.c DFMO dose = 1429 ± 85 mg/kg/d; Ornithine dose = 436 mg/100 ml o 3.3 mmoles/100 ml infusion. .sup.d Mean differs significantly compared with DFMO treated rats. 
    
     These results demonstrated that parenteral administration of polyamine precursors can significantly reduce DFMO induced platelet toxicity. The results further indicate that, at least in the animal system studied, a concentration of approximately 33 mM is adequate to prevent or reduce the occurrence of thrombocytopenia. However, it is contemplated that virtually any non-toxic amount of polyamine precursor can be employed. Moreover, the results indicate that polyamine precursors may be administered alone and do not require the presence of additional amino acids. 
     d. Inhibition of tumor growth 
     An important consideration in developing a tumor-inhibiting formulation is the interaction between tumor versus host polyamine utilization and specific amino acid solutions. It has been determined that administration of standard TPN solutions to patients with occult malignancies produce an elevation in polyamine levels compared with non-cancer patients. Consequentially, this phenomenon has been used in the formulation of specific amino acid solutions for detecting the presence of tumors in patients. 
     Generally, reduced levels of tumor polyamines have been correlated to a decrease in tumor growth rate. However, infusion of amino acid solutions rich in ornithine will increase polyamine levels despite the decrease in tumor growth rate elicited. It is hypothesized that this anomoly may be explained by ornithine&#39;s status as a non-essential amino acid. Ornithine is not incorporated into the synthesis of proteins, thus possibly explaining the lack of any increase in tumor growth exhibited in animals receiving formulations rich in ornithine. Additionally, ornithine is only passively taken up by the cells, compared to the active uptake of essential amino acids such as arginine. Also, the high polyamine levels might be explained by ornithine&#39;s status as a polyamine precursor. The reasons for the relatively large standard errors in the ornithine group tumor studies are currently being investigated to determine the actual role of ornithine in tumor growth. 
     In recent years, several studies in animal-tumor models have shown that nutritional therapy can result in tumor growth and, in some cases, accelerate growth. For some tumors, tumor growth can also occur during host starvation, emphasizing that tumors will obtain either exogenous or endogenous nutrients for their energy needs and biosynthetic pathways. (Sauer, L. A., Nagel, W. D., Dauchy R. T., et al. (1986), Cancer Res., 46:3469. 
     One strategy in approaching the problem of host-tumor competition for nutrients is to formulate an amino acid regimen that does not include substrates that enhance tumor growth. The present invention addresses this strategy by defining specific combinations and concentrations of amino acids that decrease the presence of amino acids that are polyamine biosynthetic precursors hypothesized as being responsible for stimulating tumor growth. A formula which includes a non-toxic, pharmacologically acceptable amount of the amino acids together with ornithine and citrulline and less than 0.45% by weight final concentration of arginine is one formula which has been found to inhibit tumor growth. 
     It is hypothesized that arginine is the specific amino acid responsible for stimulating tumor growth. Arginine is commonly found in general parenteral amino acid formulas and by weight (mg/100 ml) makes up 10% of the amino acid composition before formulation. After formulation of such a general parenteral amino acid formula, arginine comprises about 1% by weight final concentration (1.0 g./100 ml). Applicants&#39; solutions decrease or eliminate this standard arginine content. Also, ornithine and citrulline are not present in any commercially available parenteral amino acid formula. These amino acids are necessary to Applicant&#39;s formulas. Thus, standard solutions could not conveniently be used in their commercially available concentrations to practice the Applicants methods or formulations. 
     The subject invention includes several formulations comprised of various mixtures of essential and nonessential amino acids obtained in crystalline form. Arginine may or may not be included in the particular formula. A sufficient quantity of citrulline or ornithine is then added so as to constitute greater than about 0.5% by weight concentration of the solution upon the addition of a suitable liquid medium. One preferred liquid medium is a glucose solution. This glucose solution may range from 5% to 70% glucose in the present formulations. Patient nutritional support formulations are commonly constituted in such glucose solutions. Desirable relative internal proportions of the included amino acids are defined by the following Table VII for every 100 milliliters of the formulation. 
     
                       TABLE VII______________________________________     Amino Acids              Mg./100 ml. formulation______________________________________Essential   leucine    250 to     1400 mgAmino Acids isoleucine 200 to     1400 mg       valine     200 to     1250 mg.       phenylalanine                  100 to     900 mg       methionine 50 to      850 mg       lysine     150 to     750 mg       histidine  85 to      500 mg       threonine  100 to     550 mg       tryptophan 50 to      200 mgNon-essential       alanine    200 to     3500 mgAmino Acids glycine    250 to     2000 mg       proline    100 to     1500 mg       serine     5 to       650 mg       tyrosine   30 to      60 mg______________________________________ 
    
     It will be understood that in addition to the amino acids, the formulation may include preservation agents. 
     The preparations may be advantageously prepared in the form of sterile aqueous solutions adapted for intravenous administration. In accordance with known practice for such solutions, the malignant disease amino acid solutions will be sterile, pyrogen free, and at a suitable pH for parenteral administration. 
     Specific formulations for practicing the present invention are set out in the following examples. 
     EXAMPLE III 
     A sterile, non-pyrogenic, stable solution suitable for parenteral administration to patients with malignant disease is prepared from pure crystalline amino acids, which are dissolved in a glucose solution (5% to 70%) in the following concentrations: 
     
         ______________________________________Amino Acids  Mg./100 ml. formulation______________________________________leucine      250 to        1400 mgisoleucine   200 to        1400 mgvaline       200 to        1250 mg.phenylalanine        100 to        900 mgmethionine   50 to         850 mglysine       150 to        750 mghistidine    85 to         500 mgthreonine    100 to        550 mgtryptophan   50 to         200 mgtyrosine     30 to         60 mg______________________________________ 
    
     This formulation is arginine-free. 
     To the foregoing formulation is added a sufficient quantity of citrulline or ornithine so as to constitute about 1% by weight of the formulation. At least one of the following non-essential amino acids is then added in the following concentration: 
     
         ______________________________________Amino Acids  Mg./100 ml. formulation______________________________________alanine      200 to        3500 mgglycine      250 to        2000 mgproline      100 to        1500 mgserine       5 to          650 mg______________________________________ 
    
     The solution is then filtered into appropriate containers for intravenous fluids and steam sterilized at 250° F. for 10 minutes. To prepare for administration, the volume is then brought to the desired feeding solution volume with an additional volume of glucose solution and kept cool. The solution is then administered to the patient intravenously (i.v.). 
     EXAMPLE IV 
     If a formulation of amino acids for patients with malignant disease is desired which contains ornithine, but is citrulline free, the formula as outlined in Example III can be utilized. Ornithine will be added to constitute greater than about a 0.5% by weight concentration of the formulation, and no citrulline will be added. The same proportions of the essential and non-essential acids (leucine, isoleucine, valine, phenylalanine, lysine, valine, isoleucine, threonine, tryptophan, histidine, tyrosine, alanine, glycine, proline and serine) will be present; and the solution prepared in the same manner. This formulation is arginine-free. 
     EXAMPLE V 
     Following the procedure of Example IV, an alternate amino acid formulation with arginine for patients with malignant disease is prepared from the following pure crystalline amino acids and in the following concentrations: 
     
         ______________________________________     Amino Acids              Mg./100 ml. formulation______________________________________Essential   leucine    250 to     1400 mgAmino Acids isoleucine 200 to     1400 mg       valine     200 to     1250 mg.       phenylalanine                  100 to     900 mg       methionine 50 to      850 mg       lysine     150 to     750 mg       histidine  85 to      500 mg       threonine  100 to     550 mg       tryptophan 50 to      200 mgNon-essential       alanine    200 to     3500 mgAmino Acids glycine    250 to     2000 mg       proline    100 to     1500 mg       serine     5 to       650 mg       tyrosine   30 to      60 mg______________________________________ 
    
     This mixture of essential and non-essential amino acids is then dissolved in distilled water. To the foregoing formulation is added a sufficient quantity of arginine so as to constitute less than about 0.10% by weight of the final formulation. Ornithine or citrulline is then added so as to constitute at least about 0.50% by weight of the final formulation. The volume is then brought to the desired volume with a glucose solution (5% to 70%). The solution is then filtered into appropriate containers for intravenous fluids and steam sterilized at 250° F. for 10 minutes. 
     To prepare the feeding solution, the stock formula above is then added to an appropriate volume of glucose solution (5% to 70%) so as to constitute a final arginine concentration of less than about 0.10% by weight. 
     EXAMPLE VI 
     If a formulation of amino acids for patients with malignant disease is desired which contains alanine as the non-essential amino acid of choice, the formula as outlined in Example III can be utilized. The same proportions of the essential amino acids (leucine, isoleucine, valine, phenylalanine, methionine, lysine, histidine, threonine, tryptophan and tyrosine) will be present; and the solution prepared in the same manner. Alanine will then be included at about a 1% by weight final concentration of the formula upon the addition of a glucose solution to the prepared stock. 
     EXAMPLE VII 
     A sterile, non-pyrogenic, stable solution suitable for parenteral administration to patients with malignant disease is prepared from pure crystalline amino acids, which are dissolved in distilled water in the following concentrations: 
     
         ______________________________________     Amino Acids              Mg./100 ml. formulation______________________________________Essential   leucine    250 to     1400 mgAmino Acids isoleucine 200 to     1400 mg       valine     200 to     1250 mg.       phenylalanine                  100 to     900 mg       methionine 50 to      850 mg       lysine     150 to     750 mg       histidine  85 to      500 mg       threonine  100 to     550 mg       tryptophan 50 to      200 mgNon-essential       alanine    200 to     3500 mgAmino Acids glycine    250 to     2000 mg       proline    100 to     1500 mg       serine     5 to       650 mg       tyrosine   30 to      60 mg______________________________________ 
    
     To the foregoing formulation is added a sufficient quantity of ornithine so as to constitute about greater than 0.5% by weight of the final formulation. Also, citrulline is to be added so as to constitute about 0.01 to 2% by weight of the final formulation. Arginine is to be included so as to constitute a less than about 0.10% by weight concentration of the final formulation. The solution is then filtered and filled into appropriate containers for intravenous fluids and steam sterilized at 250° F. for 10 minutes. To prepare the actual feeding solution from the above stock, the volume is then brought to the desired volume with a glucose solution so as to constitute at least a 0.50% by weight ornithine and less than about 0.10% arginine. 
     To test the above amino acid formula theory, Applicants conducted a preliminary study employing two different regimens, one a standard TPN solution, the other a control group. Each regimen was administered parenterally to adult rats for a period of 12 days. Prior to treatment, these rats had been implanted with transplantable colon tumor in the R flank. When the implant had grown to approximately 3 grams, the respective regimen was administered through a central venous catheter. As shown in FIG. 6, tumor growth in weight for the TPN group was significantly greater than the CHOW final tumor weight (P&lt;0.05). a=p&lt;0.05 compared with CHOW final tumor weight. 
     The following studies, Examples VIII, IX, and X were designed to determine if the polyamine precursors in TPN solutions were responsible for stimulating tumor growth. In Example VIII, Fisher 344 male rats received an implant of Ward Colon carcinoma (WCC) in the R flank. When the implants had grown to approximately 3 grams, the rats were randomized to four groups, and a central venous catheter inserted. Four different regimens, including a standard TPN regimen, an EAA (essential amino acid) regimen, a EAA+NEAA (essential amino acids plus nonessential amino acids arginine free) and a Control group (i.v. saline and chow ad libitum), were infused for 12 days through the catheter. The content of each regimen is presented at Table VIII. As shown in FIG. 8, the greatest rate of tumor growth was exhibited in the TPN group. This study suggested arginine may be important in stimulating tumor growth. 
     Example IX was then devised to confirm the results in the previous study that suggested the presence of arginine in TPN solutions contributed to tumor growth. Fisher 344 male rats first received an implant of Ward Colon carcinoma. When the implant grew to approximately 4 grams, the animals were randomized into four groups and a central venous catheter inserted. Arginine and ornithine were then added back to separate TPN formulas. A third regimen wherein alanine was added back to the formulation was also used. A control group received saline intravenously (i.v.) and chow ad libitum. Each formulation was infused to a separate group of the above described rats. The contents of each of these regimens is outlined in Table IX. The respective solutions were parenterally administered for 6 days, after which time tumor growth was assessed. The results, as shown at FIG. 9, indicate that the addition of arginine increased WCC growth compared with control. This is in contrast to the results obtained when either alanine or ornithine was added to the TPN solution, where there was observed no significant difference in tumor growth compared with control. 
     Example X was then conducted to determine the concentration of arginine which increased tumor growth rate. Fisher 344 male rates were prepared as above and then randomized to four groups. Three arginine regimens with decreasing concentrations of arginine were formulated as outlined in Table X. A control group received saline and chow ad libitum. After 12 days of parenteral administration of the various regimens, tumor growth and urine ammonia levels were assessed. The results, as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11, indicate that concentrations of arginine as low as 0.10% by weight were able to stimulate tumor growth rate over controls. Urine ammonia levels were found to be inversely proportional to arginine regimen concentration, with the highest urine ammonia levels present in the 0.10% arginine group. No detectable urine ammonia was present in the urine of control group animals. These results suggest that arginine stimulates tumor growth rate and that a nonstimulatory concentration of arginine is most preferably less than 0.10% by weight final concentration. 
     These results indicate that cancer patients requiring TPN would benefit from a modified amino acid formula that deletes or reduces arginine. Additionally, a method of inhibiting tumor growth using formulations that contain less than about 0.10% by weight arginine content is herein devised. Ornithine and/or citrulline should be added to these modified solutions in a concentration sufficient to maintain substrates for the urea cycle. Ornithine in at least a 0.5% by weight final concentration of the feeding formulation is adequate for urea cycle substrate purposes. The results obtained in the following experiments demonstrate that a specific amino acid formula with decreased arginine concentration (less than about 0.10% by weight) can effectively reduce tumor growth rate during nutritional therapy in a patient with malignant disease. 
     EXAMPLE VIII 
     This study was performed to demonstrate that the presence of particular precursors for polyamine biosynthesis in TPN solutions is responsible for stimulating tumor growth. 
     Male Fisher 344 rats were purchased from Timco Harlan-Sprague-Dawley (Houston, Tex.). All rats were allowed a 7-day acclimation period with chow (Purina 5001) and water ad libitum. A Ward colon carcinoma (WCC) was implanted subcutaneously in the right flank of each animal under anesthesia. When these tumor implants had grown to approximately 3 grams, the rats were randomized to four groups and a central venous catheter inserted in the right flank. Each group of rats received one of the following 4 formulations: TPN; EAA (Essential Amino Acid Solution) with arginine; EAA+NEAA (Essential Amino Acid and Nonessential Amino Acid solution), without arginine; or Control (Saline). The control group of five rats received saline by infusion and rat chow. All solutions were administered for 12 days. In particular, the amino acid composition of the parenteral regimens used in this example is displayed in Table VIII. The TPN solution utilized in formulating a solution for one of the groups was TRAVESOL® 10%, whose amino acid composition is displayed in Table 1. TRAVESOL® 10% stock is used in compounding a feeding solution for general administration in patients with benign or malignant diseases. 
     Tumor weight was determined in each group before and after the 12-day treatment period. Results from this study are shown in FIG. 7. The Control group exhibited a tumor weight of 11±4 while the TPN treated group - exhibited a tumor weight of 39±2 g. There was no significant increase in tumor weight in the group receiving the EAA regimen (11+2). The EAA+NEAA arginine-free treated rats exhibited a slight increase in tumor weight, but much less than the TPN treated group (17+4). The data indicates that TPN-stimulated tumor growth may be controlled by restricting arginine content. 
     Animal Population 
     Male Fisher 344 rats were purchased from Timco Harlan-Sprague-Dawley (Houston, Tex.). All rats were allowed a 7-day acclimation period with chow (Purina 5001) and water ad libitum. Each rat was then inoculated subcutaneously in the right flank with a transplantable Ward Colon carcinoma (WCC). When the implants grew to approximately 3 grams in weight, the rats were randomized to four groups. 
     Nutritional Regimen 
     The content of the solutions used in this study appear at Table VIII. TPN solutions consisted of 500 ml D50W+500 ml 10% TRAVESOL®. EAA regimen consisted of 500 ml D50W+500 ml essential amino acid (EAA) solution. EAA+NEAA consisted of 500 ml D50W+500 ml essential and non-essential amino acids (NEAA) deleting arginine. Control received intravenous saline and chow ad libitum. All solutions were administered through a central venous catheter by continuous i.v. infusion for 12 days. Daily intake of control rats was 52±9 cal and 584+104 mg nitrogen. Daily intake of TPN was 54±2 cal and 550±15 mg nitrogen. EAA daily intake was 51+4 cal and 270±10 mg nitrogen. EAA+NEAA regimen daily intake was 51±5 cal and 574±15 mg nitrogen. TPN and EAA+NEAA regimens were isonitrogenous and isocaloric with the only difference being the content of arginine. 
     Study Design 
     Each of 18 Fisher adult male rats were given a subcutaneous implantation (in the right flank) of a fixed volume of tumorous cells. When the implant of tumorous Ward colon carcinoma cells reached about a 3 gram weight, the rats were randomized to four groups and a central venous catheter inserted. Each group was to receive either TPN, EAA formula, EAA+NEAA (arginine free) or Saline (control group) for a period of 12 days. Calculations of each tumor weight in grams in each of the animals was made after the 12 day regimen. In this manner, each rat served as its own control in determining the effect of the particular regimen on tumor growth. Analysis of data was done by a student&#39;s t-test, comparing tumor growth before and after the designated regimen between treatment groups. 
     Tumor Growth Determinations 
     The TPN-induced tumor growth was determined from the calculated tumor weight in grams after the 12-day treatment. The results are shown in FIG. 7. Tumor growth was assessed by two-dimensional measurements with calipers, (length and width) and the equation, length (cm)×(width [cm] 2  ×1/2=grams of tumor tissue, was used to estimate tumor weight. 
     The results are demonstrated in FIG. 7. As FIG. 7 indicates, TPN resulted in tumor growth stimulation compared with Control. EAA did not stimulate tumor growth compared with Control. There was a slight increase in tumor growth with EAA+NEAA compared with Control, but tumor size was markedly lower than TPN tumors. The EAA+ NEAA regimens did not contain arginine, thus, it is deduced that the presence of arginine in TPN solutions is important in stimulating tumor growth. TPN solutions contain final arginine concentrations of about 1% by weight in the feeding formulations. 
     
                       TABLE VIII______________________________________Amino Acid Composition ofParenteral Regimens of Rats            Concentrations of each aminoAmino            acid (mg) per 100 mlAcid          % N    EAA     EAA + NEAA                                  TPN______________________________________LEUCINE       10.67  825     825       730METHIONINE    9.39   825     825       400PHENYLALANINE 8.48   825     825       560LYSINE        19.16  600     600       580VALINE        11.96  600     600       580ISOLEUCINE    10.68  525     525       600THREONINE     11.76  375     375       420TRYPTOPHAN    13.72  188     188       180HISTIDINE     27.08  412     412       480ALANINE       15.72  --      3210      2070ARGININE      32.16  --      --        1150GLYCINE       18.66  --      1599      1030PROLINE       12.17  --      1059      680SERINE        13.33  --      780       500TYROSINE      7.73   --       51        40______________________________________ The EAA regimen was formulated with 500 ml of Aminess ®, 500 ml D50W, electrolytes, and multivitamins. EAA + NEAA regimen was formulated with 500 ml of 10% EAA + NEAA, 500 ml D50W, electrolytes, and multivitamins. TPN regimen consisted of 500 ml 10% TRAVESOL ®, 500 ml D50W, electrolytes, and multivitamins. These were administered by continuous infusion through a central venous catheter, the flow rate being controlle with Holter 903 pump. The amino acid concentration (mg/100 ml) in the table is the concentration of the 500 ml amino acid solution before formulation. Formulation was accomplished by the addition of a glucose solution to the above described stock. 
    
     EXAMPLE IX 
     This study was performed to determine whether the addition of arginine and ornithine to a total parenteral nutritional (TPN) regimen would stimulate tumor growth. TPN regimens containing alanine, arginine or ornithine were administered i.v. A control group received saline and chow ad libitum. The various regimens were administered parenterally to male Fisher 344 rats with Ward Colon Carcinoma implants that had grown to approximately 4 grams. Each group consisted of 5 rats. Tumor size was determined before and after the designated regimen for each animal. Percent increase in tumor weights in the ALANINE regimen group and the ORNITHINE regimen group did not differ from the CONTROL group. An increase in percent tumor growth compared with Control was observed in the ARGININE group, yet no significant difference was observed in the ALANINE group. The data indicates that cancer patients requiring TPN would benefit from a modified amino acid formula that deletes or reduces arginine content. 
     Animal Population 
     Male Fisher 344 rats were purchased from Timco Harlan-Sprague- Dawley (Houston, Tex.). All rats were allowed a 7-day acclimation period with chow (Purina 5001) and water ad libitum. A Ward Colon Carcinoma (WCC) was implanted subcutaneously in the right flank of each rat under anesthesia. When the implant grew to approximately 3 grams, the rats were randomized to four groups. A central venous catheter was then inserted into each rat. 
     Nutritional Regiment 
     Four nutritional regimens were formulated for this study. Each group of rats were given one of these regimens. 
     The amino acid composition of each regimen is displayed at Table IX. The ALANINE regimen consisted of 500 ml D50W+250 ml 5.5% essential amino acid (EAA, Nephramine)+294 mg/100 ml alanine. ARGININE regimen consisted of 500 ml D50W+250 ml 5.5% EAA+575 mg/100 ml arginine. ORNITHINE regimen consisted of 500 ml D50W+250 ml 5.5% EAA+436 mg/100 ml ornithine. The CONTROL regimen consisted of saline infusion with chow supplied ad libitum. Table IX defines the composition of each of these formulations. The solutions were infused for 6 days and tumor growth was assessed. 
     Study Design 
     Each of 20 Fisher adult male rats were given a subcutaneous implantation in the right flank of a fixed volume of tumorous cells, Wards colon carcinoma. When the implant grew to approximately 3 grams, the rats were randomized into 4 different treatment groups. A central venous catheter was then inserted. Each group was to receive a regimen of ALANINE, ORNITHINE, ARGININE, or SALINE (CONTROL) and chow ad libitum for 6 days. Tumor growth in each animal was assessed for percent increase in tumor weight compared to that animals pre-regimen tumor weight. In this manner, each rat served as his or her own control in determining the effect of the particular regimen on tumor growth. The various treatment regimens were also compared as against the CONTROL group for percent tumor growth. 
     Percent Tumor Growth Determinations 
     Tumor growth was assessed by a measure of percent increase in tumor weight before and after the designated regimen. The results are demonstrated in FIG. 8. As demonstrated in FIG. 8, the ALANINE formula did not stimulate WCC tumor growth compared with CONTROL. Increased WCC tumor growth compared with CONTROL was observed when ARGININE was substituted for alanine at an equimolar amount. There was no significant difference in tumor growth compared with CONTROL when TPN formula contained ORNITHINE. 
     
                       TABLE IX______________________________________Amino acid composition ofparenteral regimens of rats       Concentration of each aminoAmino       acid (mg) per 100 mlAcid        ALANINE   ARGININE   ORNITHINE______________________________________LEUCINE     293       293        293METHIONINE  293       293        293PHENYL-     293       293        293ALANINELYSINE      213       213        213VALINE      213       213        213ISOLEUCINE  187       187        187THREONINE   110       110        110TRYPTOPHAN  55        55         55HISTIDINE   143       143        143ALANINE     294       0          0ARGININE    0         575        0ORNITHINE   0         0          436______________________________________ The final regimens were formulated with 250 ml of the above amino acid solution, 500 ml D50W, TPNelectrolytes (Abbott Laboratories), and multivitamins. These were administered by continuous infusion through a central venous catheter, the flow rate being controlled with Holter 903 pump. Concentration of amino acid represents final concentration in total volume of 750 ml. Alanine, arginine, and ornithine were added in equimola amounts. 
    
     EXAMPLE X 
     This study was performed to determine the concentrations of arginine which stimulate tumor growth. Modified TPN solutions containing 0.10%, 0.25% or 0.65% Arginine by weight final feeding formulation concentrations were administered i.v. A control group received i.v. 0.90% NaCl (saline) and chow ad libitum. The various regimens were administered parenterally to male Fisher 344 rats with Ward Colon Carcinoma implants that had grown to approximately 4 grams. Each of the Arginine groups consisted of 4 rats while the control group consisted of 3 rats. Tumor size was determined before and after the designated regimen for each animal. Urine ammonia levels were also determined before and after the designated regimen for each animal. The post-treatment tumor weights (g) in the 0.10%, 0.25% and 0.65% Arginine groups did differ significantly from the Control group. However, no significant difference was observed in post-treatment tumor weights between the various Arginine groups. The data indicates that patients requiring TPN would benefit from a modified amino acid formula that deletes or reduces arginine content to less than 0.10% by weight final concentration. 
     Animal Population 
     Male Fisher 344 rats were purchased from Timco Harlan-Sprague-Dawley (Houston, Tex.). All rats were allowed a 7-day acclimation period with chow (Purina 500) and water ad libitum. A Ward Colon Carcinoma (WCC) was implanted subcutaneously in the right flank of 15 rats under anesthesia. When the implant grew to approximately 4 grams, the rats were randomized to 3 groups of 4 rats each and 1 group of 3 rats. A central venous catheter was then inserted into each rat. 
     Nutritional Regimen 
     Four nutritional regimens were formulated for this study. Each group of rats was given one of these regimens. 
     The amino acid composition of each regimen is displayed at Table X. The 0.65% arginine regimen consisted of 500 ml D50W+500 ml Aminess®+0.65 g./100 ml. arginine. The 0.25% arginine regimen consisted of 500 ml D50W+500 ml Aminess®+0.25 g./100 ml arginine. The 0.10% arginine regimen consisted of 500 ml D 50W+500 ml Aminess®+0.10 g./100 ml arginine. The CONTROL regimen consisted of saline infusion with chow ad libitum. Table X also defines the mixture and proportion of other amino acids contained in each of the three arginine regimens. The solutions were infused for 12 days. Tumor growth and urine ammonia levels were then assessed and compared to pre-treatment levels. 
     Study Design 
     Each of 15 Fisher adult male rats were given a subcutaneous implantation in the right flank of a fixed volume of tumorous cells, Wards Colon Carcinoma. When the implant grew to approximately 4 grams, the rats were randomized into 4 treatment groups. A central venous catheter was then inserted. Each group was to receive a regimen of 0.10%, 0.25% or 0.65% arginine or saline (control) and chow ad libitum for 12 days. Tumor growth in each arginine regimen animal was assessed for weight increase compared to tumor growth exhibited in the saline (control) regimen animals. Also, tumor growth in each animal was assessed for increase in tumor weight compared to that animals pre-regimen tumor weight. In this manner, each rat served as his or her own control in determining the effect of the particular regimen on tumor growth. Urine ammonia levels were also determined for each of the arginine regimen animals. These values were compared to the urine ammonia levels of saline (control) regimen animals. 
     Tumor Growth Determinations 
     Tumor growth was assessed by a measure of increase in tumor weight before and after the designated regimen as described in Example VIII. The results are demonstrated in FIG. 9. Post-treatment tumor weights in the 0.10%, 0.25% and 0.65% arginine concentration regimens did not vary significantly among groups. However, all 3 arginine regimen groups did exhibit post-treatment tumor weights significantly greater than the saline (control) regimen group tumor weights. 
     Urine Ammonia Determinations 
     Urine ammonia levels were assessed as a function of urine NH4 (mg./24 hours) in each animal post-treatment. The levels obtained from animals of each arginine treatment group were averaged and compared to the average level obtained in the saline (control) treated group. As demonstrated in FIG. 10, there was an inverse relationship between the concentration of arginine given in the regimen to the level of urine ammonia. Thus, the 0.25% arginine group exhibited higher urine ammonia levels compared to the 0.65% arginine group, and the 0.10% arginine group exhibited higher urine ammonia levels compared to the 0.25% arginine group. All arginine groups (0.10%, 0.25%, 0.65%) displayed urine ammonia levels significantly higher than the saline (control) treated group. 
     
                       TABLE X______________________________________Amino acid composition ofparenteral regimens of rats         Concentration of each aminoAmino         acid (mg) per 100 mlAcid          0.1% arg  0.25% arg 0.65% arg______________________________________EssentialLEUCINE       413       413       413METHIONINE    413       413       413PHENYLALANINE 413       413       413LYSINE        300       300       300VALINE        300       300       300ISOLEUCINE    263       263       263THREONINE     188       188       188TRYPTOPHAN     94       94        94HISTIDINE     206       206       206NonessentialALANINE       1035      1035      1035ARGININE      100       250       650GLYCINE       1463      1203      515PROLINE       340       340       340SERINE        250       250       250______________________________________ The TPN regimen was formulated with 500 ml of Aminess ®, 500 ml D50W, electrlytes, and multivitamins. The amino acids, alanine, arginine, glycine, proline and serine were added to the TPN regimen. These solution were administered by continuous infusion through a central venous catheter, the flow rate being controlled with Holter 903 pump. The amino acid concentration(mg/100 ml) in this table is the concentration of the amino acids in the one liter TPN solution. Control received i.v. 0.90% NaCl(saline) and chow ad libitum. The 0.10% arg group received a TPN formula with a final arginine concentration of 0.1 g/100 ml. The 0.25% arg group received a TPN formula with a final concentration of 0.25 g/100 ml. The 0.65% arg group received a TPN formul with a final arginine concentration of 0.65 g/100 ml. 
    
     e. Promotion of Cell Growth 
     An important consideration in developing a parenteral formulation which averts the development of intestinal epithelium cell atrophy is consideration of the trophic availability of nutrients provided to the tissue by the particular formulation. 
     It is hypothesized that gut atrophy is the result of decreased polyamine nutrient availability to intestinal mucosa, even though the patient is being infused with a nutrient formulation containing a group of standard amino acids. Glutamine-containing parenteral formulations were found to restore gut epithelium. However, glutamine-containing formulations possess the disadvantage of being an important energy substrate for tumors when the formula is administered parenterally. Additionally, glutamine in solution has poor chemical stability (Sigma Chemical Catalog, (1989), pp. 1407-1409). Specifically, the use of glutamine in a TPN formula is limited by its rapid breakdown to glutamic acid+NH 3  in solution. This factor is important as the shelf life required for commercially marketed parenteral amino acid solutions is from 24-36 months. 
     The instability of L-glutamine in solution has also been of concern to many tissue culture scientists, as glutamine is an essential amino acid required by virtually all mammalian cells in culture regardless of type. Glutamine begins to break down chemically after only 2 days in storage at 21° C. (room temperature), and only after 1 day stored at 35° C. (room temperature) (Sigma Catalog, (1987), FIGS. 1 and 2, respectively, p. 1408). Glutamine stored at 4° C. begins to degrade after 20 days in storage (Sigma Catalog, (1989), 1407-1409, Table 1). These factors led the Applicants to consider alternative formulations which would have the same &#34;trophic&#34; effect on mucosal epithelium as glutamine and which also remained chemically stable over extended periods of time. 
     Alternative non-glutamine amino acid formulations were developed by Applicant, and proved to be equally as effective in preventing gut atrophy and promoting intestinal mucosal growth as less stable glutamine-containing formulations. 
     Ornithine-containing TPN also provides a stable nutrient supply to the treated subject (i.e., no continued weight loss). Additionally, specific combinations and concentrations of ornithine-containing formulations are hypothesized by Applicants to have a trophic effect on epithelial mucosal surfaces. Applicants have found that a formulation which includes a non-toxic, pharmacologically acceptable amount of amino acids together with ornithine maintains intestinal epithelial integrity. Specifically, ornithine in a concentration of between about 0.55% and 2% final concentration together with a TPN formulation has been found by Applicants to promote significant growth of intestinal villi. 
     Applicants postulate that ornithine provides tropic stimuli to the mucosal surface which in turn results in aversion of gut atrophy. Gut atrophy observed with administration of other non-ornithine containing TPN formulations is theorized by Applicants to be the result of cell nutrient deprivation. Applicants theorize that ornithine provides an instantly available nutrient source its intestinal surfaces, and in this manner averts the onset of gut atrophy. Applicants&#39; formulations include ornithine in a final concentration of between about 0.55% to about 2%. Unfortunately, generally used standard TPN regimens do not contain ornithine. Thus, Applicants propose the addition of ornithine to the parenteral regimen either of a patient in the form of a complete ornithine-TPN regimen or as a TPN supplement. Such would provide valuable nutritional support to the patient without the gut atrophy side effects attendant to prolonged TPN administration. 
     A more preferred ornithine concentration is between about 0.60% to about 1.5% by weight ornithine in the complete formulation. The most preferred ornithine concentration is about 0.65% (6.5 g/L). 
     The present formulation also constitutes an ornithine supplement which could conveniently be used as an additive to other commercially available TPN formulations. Such formulations may also include arginine in one preferred embodiment. These arginine-containing formulations would preferably be used in the treatment of non-cancer patients. Alternatively, an argine-free mixture of amino acids may be combined with the defined amounts of ornithine to provide an epithelial-maintaining nutrient formulation for cancer patients. Arginine concentrations typically contained in commercial TPN formulations of 1% are theorized, as will be recalled, to stimulate tumor growth (supra). 
     The ornithine formulations further comprise a liquid medium. While any pharmacologically acceptable solution may comprise the medium, a preferred medium is a glucose solution. The glucose solution may range from 5% to 70% glucose in the present formulations. As noted above, the ornithine formulations may further comprise a mixture of amino acids and arginine. The particular amino acids with their preferred relative internal proportions are defined by the following Table XI for every 100 milliliters of the formulation. 
     
                       TABLE XI______________________________________     Amino Acids              Mg./100 ml. formulation______________________________________Essential   leucine    250 to     1400 mgAmino Acids isoleucine 200 to     1400 mg       valine     200 to     1250 mg.       phenylalanine                  100 to     900 mg       methionine 50 to      850 mg       lysine     150 to     750 mg       histidine  85 to      500 mg       threonine  100 to     550 mg       tryptophan 50 to      200 mgNon-essential       alanine    200 to     3500 mgAmino Acids glycine    250 to     2000 mg       proline    100 to     l500 mg       serine     5 to       650 mg       tyrosine   30 to      60 mg______________________________________ 
    
     It will be understood that in addition to the amino acids, the formulation may include preservation agents. 
     The preparations may be advantageously prepared in the form of sterile aqueous solutions adapted for intravenous administration. In accordance with known practice for such solutions, the ornithine containing formulations will be sterile, pyrogen-free, and at a suitable pH for parenteral administration. 
     Specific formulations as well as methods for preparing and using the formulations in the practice of the present invention are set out in the following examples. 
     EXAMPLE XI 
     A sterile, non pyrogenic, stable solution suitable for parenteral administration to non-cancer patients with compromised or under developed mucosal epithelial surfaces is prepared from pure crystalline amino acids, which are dissolved in a glucose solution (5%-70%) in the following concentrations: 
     
                       TABLE XII______________________________________Amino Acids  Mg./100 ml. formulation______________________________________leucine      250 to        1400 mgisoleucine   200 to        1400 mgvaline       200 to        1250 mg.phenylalanine        100 to        900 mgmethionine   50 to         850 mglysine       150 to        750 mghistidine    85 to         500 mgthreonine    100 to        550 mgtryptophan   50 to         200 mgtyrosine     30 to         60 mg______________________________________ 
    
     This formulation contains arginine in a concentration of about 1% by weight of the formulation. 
     To the formulation is added sufficient quantity of ornithine so as to constitute about 0.65% by weight of the formulation. At least one of the following nonessential amino acids is then added in the following concentrations: 
     
         ______________________________________Amino Acids  Mg./100 ml. formulation______________________________________alanine      200 to        3500 mgglycine      250 to        2000 mgproline      100 to        1500 mgserine       5 to          650 mg______________________________________ 
    
     The solution is then filtered into appropriate containers for intravenous fluids and steam sterilized at 250° F. for 10 minutes. To prepare for administration, the solution is brought to the desired feeding solution concentration with an additional volume of glucose solution and kept refrigerated in diluted state until use. 
     The addition of glutamine (g/n) to a TPN solution was found to enhance villi length compared to growth observed in the control and TPN+glycine (g/y) treatment groups. As shown in FIG. 12, villi length in ileum was significantly greater in the TPN+ornithine (Orn) group compared with the control and TPN+glycine group. These results suggest that ornithine is important in maintaining the intestinal epithelium of the ileal section of the small intestine, as was found for the jejunum section of the small intestine. 
     These results also suggest that ornithine is superior to glutamine in terms of its promotion of cell growth and chemical stability in solution. 
     EXAMPLE XII 
     If a formulation of amino acids for patients with compromised mucosal epithelial surfaces and malignant disease is desired which contains ornithine, the formulation as outlined in Example XI can be utilized. Ornithine will be added to constitute between about 0.55% and 2.0% by weight of the formulation, and no arginine will be added. 
     The same proportions of the essential and non-essential acids (leucine, isoleucine, valine, phenylalamine, lysine, isolecine, threonine, tryptophan, histidine, tyrosine, alanine, glycine, proline, and serine) will be present; and the solution prepared in the same manner. This formulation is arginine-free. 
     EXAMPLE XIII 
     Following the procedure of Example XII, an alternative amino acid formulation with arginine for patients with compromised mucosal epithelial surfaces and malignant disease is prepared from the following pure crystalline amino acids and in the following concentrations: 
     
                       TABLE XIII______________________________________     Amino Acids              Mg./100 ml. formulation______________________________________Essential   leucine    250 to     1400 mgAmino Acids isoleucine 200 to     1400 mg       valine     200 to     1250 mg.       phenylalanine                  100 to     900 mg       methionine 50 to      850 mg       lysine     150 to     750 mg       histidine  85 to      500 mg       threonine  100 to     550 mg       tryptophan 50 to      200 mgNon-essential       alanine    200 to     3500 mgAmino Acids glycine    250 to     2000 mg       proline    100 to     1500 mg       serine     5 to       650 mg       tyrosine   30 to      60 mg______________________________________ 
    
     This mixture of essential and nonessential amino acids is then dissolved in distilled water. To the foregoing formulation is added a sufficient quantity of ornithine so as to constitute between about 0.50% and about 2% weight of the final formulation and a sufficient quantity of arginine so as to constitute less than about 1.0% by weight of the final formulation. The solution is then brought to the desired volume with a glucose solution (5%-70%). The solution is then filtered into appropriate containers for intravenous fluids and steam sterilized at 250° for 10 minutes. 
     To prepare a feeding solution, the stock formula above is then added to an appropriate volume of glucose solution (5% to 70%) so as to constitute a final ornithine concentration of between about 0.5% and about 2% and an arginine concentration of less than about 1.0% by weight. 
     EXAMPLE XIV 
     A stable ornithine additive suitable for administration when combined with a nutrient formulation for parenteral use is prepared from crystalline L-ornithine HCl, which is dissolved in a solution of 0.9% NaCl in a concentration of between about 5% to about 20% by weight of the solution (i.e., about 5 g/L to about 20 g/L in NaCL) solution. The mixture of ornithine and NaCl is to be stirred until a homogeneous solution is formed. The ornithine solution constitutes an ornithine additive. The ornithine additive is then filtered into appropriate containers for storage and steam sterilized at 250° for 10 minutes. The additive may be stored for up to 1 year prior to use. 
     To prepare a feeding solution with the ornithine additive, the ornithine additive above is added to an appropriate volume of glucose solution (5% to 70%) so as to constitute a final ornithine concentration of between about 0.5% and about 2%. For example, 1 part of the above-described ornithine additive diluted in 9 parts of a glucose solution would comprise an ornithine-containing nutrient solution of between about 0.5% to about 2.0% ornithine. 
     The ornithine additive may also be used in conjunction with a mixture of essential and non-essential amino acids, as described in Example XIII. The mixture of amino acids may further comprise arginine. The concentration of included arginine may be &lt;1% final concentration of the feeding formulation for tumor-bearing patients. 
     Formulations for non-tumor bearing patients may include up to 1% arginine. 
     To test the above amino acid formula theory, Applicants conducted a preliminary study to determine if the proposed ornithine concentrations achieved therapeutic ornithine levels in the test animal. This information was ascertained by measurement of circulating ornithine concentrations. Four different regimens, one a standard TPN solution, a second glycine (5 g/L)-containing TPN solution, a third glutamine (4.8 g/L)-containing TPN solution and a fourth ornithine (4.4 g/L)-containing TPN solution. The amino acid and polyamine content of each formulation appears in Table XIV. Each regimen was administered parenterally to a group of adult Fischer 344 male rats for a period of 8 days. At the end of 8 days, the animals from all four groups were sacrificed and blood samples collected. Circulating plasma ornithine levels in each of the samples was determined. Results appear in FIG. 13. 
     
                       TABLE XIV______________________________________Amino acid composition ofparenteral regimens of rats       Concentration of each amino       acid (mg) per 100 mlAmino                TPN +    TPN +   TPN +Acid          TPN    Glycine  glutamine                                 ornithine______________________________________LEUCINE       413    413      413     413METHIONINE    413    413      413     413PHENYLALANINE 413    413      413     413LYSINE        300    300      300     300VALINE        300    300      300     300ISOLEUCINE    263    263      263     263THREONINE     188    188      188     188TRYPTOPHAN    94      94       94      94HISTIDINE     206    206      206     206ALANINE       1035   1035     1035    1035ARGININE      100    100      100     100GLYCINE       1463   1463     1463    1463PROLINE       340    340      340     340SERINE        250    250      250     250GLUTAMINE     0       0       480      0ORNITHINE     0       0        0      440______________________________________ 
    
     The TPN regimen was formulated with 500 ml 50% glucose+500 ml 10% TRAVESOL®+20 ml TPN electrolytes+6 ml potassium phosphate+3 ml multivitamins. The polyamines glycine, glutamine or ornithine were added to individual TPN formulations. These solutions were administered by continuous infusion through a central venous catheter, the flow rate being controlled with a Holter 903 pump. The amino acid concentration (mg /100 ml) in Table XIV is the concentration of the amino acids in one liter TPN solution. 
     Control received i.v. 0.90% NaCl (saline) and chow ad libitum. Gly (glycine) group received a TPN formula with 5 g. glycine/L. The Gn (glutamine) group received a TPN formula with 4.8 g. glutamine/L. The ORN (ornithine) group received a TPN formula with 4.4 g. ornithine/L. 
     As shown in FIG. 13, circulating plasma ornithine levels in the glycine and glutamine regimen receiving groups were not significantly different from those measured in the control (saline) receiving regimen rats (P&gt;0.05). However, circulating plasma levels of ornithine obtained in the ornithine-containing regimen group were significantly higher than controls [390±20 n moles ornithine/ml plasma (ornithine group) vs. 90±10 n moles ornithine/ml plasma (control group)]. This data indicates that therapeutic levels of ornithine are achieved with the 0.44% (4.4 g/L) ornithine-TPN regimen. 
     The following studies, Examples XV ad XVI, were designed to determine if ornithine containing formulations were able to stimulate epithelial cell growth, indicated by an increase in intestinal villi length. Villi length was measured in two different sections of the small intestine, the jejunum and the ileum. The ileum is defined as the third portion of the small intestine which extends from the junction with the jejunum to the ileocecal opening, and is about 12 feet in length in the human. The jejunum is the portion of the small intestine, between the duodenum and the ileum, which is about 8 feet in length in the human. 
     In Example XV, non-tumor bearing Fisher 344 male rats were randomized to four groups. A central venous catheter inserted under ketamine anesthesia. Four different regimens, including a standard TPN regimen, a TPN+glycine regimen, a TPN+glutamine regimen and a TPN+ornithine regimen. A control group was sham-operated and received chow ad libitum. Animals from all groups were infused for eight days through the catheter. The content of each regimen is presented at Table XIV (supra, pg. 86). After the eight days, the animals were sacrificed and the small intestine was removed and fixed in formalin for morphometric analysis. Both small intestine villi length and crypt depth were morphometrically analyzed. Plasma was also obtained for amino acid analysis. Plasma data is presented at FIG. 13. 
     As shown in FIG. 11, villi length of the jejunum was increased With the TPN+glutamine (gln) regimen compared with control and TPN+glycine (gly). Villi length in jejunum and ileum was significantly greater in the TPN+ornithine (ORN) group compared with the control and TPN+glycine. These studies suggest that ornithine is important in maintaining the intestinal epithelium and may be superior to glutamine in terms of its biological effects and chemical stability. Glutamine doses as high as 20 g/L have been found by Applicant to have a trophic effect on intestinal epithelium, especially the ileum. 
     Example XVI was devised to determine if the same increase in villi length observed in the jejunum with ornithine-containing TPN solutions was also evident in the ileum. Non-cancer bearing Fisher 344 male rats were randomized into four groups and a central venous catheter inserted. Ornithine, glutamine or glycine were then added back to separate TPN formulas. A control group received saline intravenously (i.v.) and chow ad libitum. Each formulation was infused to a separate group of the above-described rats. The contents of each of these regimens are the same as those used in Example XIII, outlined in Table XIV. 
     The respective solutions were parenterally administered for 8 days, after which time the animals were sacrificed and ileum villi length and crypt depth examined. The results, as shown at FIG. 12, indicate that the addition of glutamine (gln) to a TPN solution increases villi length compared with control and TPN+glycine (gly). As shown in FIG. 12, villi length in ileum was significantly greater in the TPN+ornithine (ORN) groups compared with the control group and TPN+glycine group. These results suggest that ornithine is important in maintaining the intestinal epithelium of the ileal section of the small intestine. These results also suggest that ornithine is superior to glutamine in terms of its tropic-growth promoting characteristics. 
     EXAMPLE XV 
     This study was performed to demonstrate that the presence of ornithine in TPN solutions promotes epithelial cell growth. Specifically, the effect of ornithine-containing TPN formulations on the growth of the small intestinal villi of the jejunum was examined. 
     Male Fisher 344 rats were purchased from Timco Harlan-Sprague-Dawley (Houston, Tex.). All rats were allowed a 7-day acclimation period with chow (Purina 5001) and water ad libitum. The rats were then randomized to four groups and a central venous catheter inserted in the right flank. Each group of rats received one of the following four formulations: TPN+Glutamine (Gln); TPN+glycine (Gly); TPN+Ornithine (Orn); or Control (Saline). The control group of five rats received saline by infusion and rat chow ad libitum. All solutions were administered for 8 days. In particular, the amino acid composition of the parenteral regimens used in this example is displayed in Table XIV, (supra, p. 86). The TPN solution utilized in formulating a solution for the treatment groups was TRAVESOL® 10% whose amino acid composition is displayed in Table 1. TRAVESOL® 10% stock is used in compounding a feeding solution for general administration in patients with benign or malignant diseases. 
     Crypt depth (data not shown) and villi length (FIG. 11) of the jejunum section of the small intestine were examined and measured after the 8 day treatment period. Results from this study are shown in FIG. 11. The control group (n=5) exhibited a villi length of 90±20 microns while the TPN+Glycine (Gly) treated group (n=8) exhibited a villi length of 33±5 micron villi length. There was no significant difference in villi length between the TPN+Glycine (Gly) treated group and the TPN+Glutamine (Gln) group (31±microns, n=7). The TPN+Ornithine (Orn group (n=1), exhibited a villus length of 35±5 microns, which was slightly greater, but not significantly different from the glycine (p&lt;0.05) and glutamine (p&lt;0.05) treated groups. The data indicates that ornithine is important in maintaining the intestinal epithelium. Additionally, Applicants observe ornithine-containing TPN formulations may be superior to glutamine in terms of its biological effects and chemical stability. 
     Animal Population 
     Male Fisher rats were purchased from Timco Harlan-Sprague-Dawley (Houston, Tex.). All rats were allowed a 7-day acclimation period with chow (Purina 5001) and water ad libitum. The rats were then randomized to four groups. 
     Nutritional Regimen 
     The content of the solutions used in this study appear at Table XIV (supra, p. 86). TPN solutions consisted of 500 ml D 50 w+500 ml 10% TRAVESOL®+20 ml TPN electrolytes+6 ml potassium phosphate+3 ml multivitamins. 
     The TPN+Gly regimen consisted of the above-described TPN solution+5 g. glycine/L, the TPN Gln regimen consisted of the above-described TPN solution+4.8 g. glutamine/L and the ornithine-regimen consisted of the above described TPN solution+4.4 g. ornithine/L. Ornithine HCl, glutamine and glycine (USP grade) were purchased from Ajinomoto USA, Inc. Controls were sham-operated and received chow ad libitum. 
     All solutions were administered through a central venous catheter by continuous i.v. infusion for 8 days. All regimens were isonitrogeneous and isocaloric with the only difference being the content of the respective polyamines. 
     Study Design 
     A group of 25 Fisher adult male rats were randomized to four groups and a central venous catheter inserted. Each group was to receive either TPN (control), TPN+Gly, TPN+Gln or TPN+Orn for a period of 8 days. Calculation on the villus length present in the jejunum from each rat were made after the 8 day regimen. The mean and standard error for each treatment groups villus length (microns) was determined. Comparisons of the villus length between groups were then made. 
     Villus Length Determinations 
     The polyamine-induced intestinal growth was determined from the calculated growth of the jejunum intestinal villus length in microns. 
     The results are demonstrated in FIG. 11. As FIG. 11 indicates, ornithine containing TPN enhanced villus length growth as much as or greater than regimens containing glycine (Gly) or glutamine (Gln). The control group of TPN alone resulted in the greatest growth enhancement (40±20) of all groups tested. 
     These results indicate that ornithine is at least as effective in stimulating small intestinal villi growth as other polyamine-containing formulations. These results together with the added chemical stability of ornithine in solution make the inclusion of ornithine more desirable in the preparation of TPN formulations in the treatment of persons with underdeveloped or compromised mucosal epithelial surfaces. 
     EXAMPLE XVI 
     This study was performed to confirm previous findings on the trophic effect of ornithine-containing TPN formulations on small intestinal villi growth. TPN solutions containing either Glycine (5 g/L, n=6), Glutamine (4.8 g/L, n=1) or Ornithine (4.4 g/L, n=7) were administered i.v. A control group (n=5) received i.v. 0.90% NaCl (saline) and chow ad libitum. The various regimens were administered parenterally to non-tumor bearing, adult male Fisher 344 rats. Villus length in the ileum was determined after the designated regimen for each animal. The post-treatment ileum villus lengths (microns) for the glycine, and glutamine groups did not differ significantly from the control group. However, villi length in ileum was significantly greater in the TPN+ornithine (Orn) group compared with the Control (p&gt;0.05) and TPN+glycine (p&gt;0.05) groups. The data indicates that patients requiring TPN could avoid gut atrophy by use of a modified amino acid formula that includes at least 0.44% ornithine by weight final concentration. 
     Animal Population 
     Male Fisher 344 rats were purchased from Timco Harlan-Sprague-Dawley (Houston, Tex.). All rats were allowed a 7-day acclimation period with chow (Purina 500) and water ad libitum. The rats were then randomized to 2 groups of 7 rats, 1 group of 6 rats and 1 group of 5 rats. A central venous catheter was then inserted under ketamine anesthesia into each rat. 
     Nutritional Regimen 
     Four nutritional regimens were formulated for this study. Each group of rats were given one of these regimens. The amino acid composition of each regimen is the same as that used in Example XIII, and is displayed at Table XIV. The Control regimen consisted of saline infusion with chow ad libitum. Each different formulation was infused for 8 days. Intestinal villus length of the ileum was then assessed in each animal. 
     Study Design 
     A group of 25 Fisher adult male rats were randomized into four treatment groups. A central venous catheter was then inserted under ketamine anesthesia. Each group was then to receive a regimen of TPN+Glycine, TPN+Glutamine, TPN+Ornithine or Saline+chow (control) for 8 days. Ileum villus lengths in microns were determined for each of the animals after the 8 day regimen, and the means and standard errors for each of the groups determined. These group means ±SE were then used to compare villus length between the groups and compared to controls. 
     Villus Length Determinations 
     Villus length was assessed by a measure of microns after the particular designated regimen as described in Example XIV. The results are demonstrated in FIG. 12. Post-treatment ileal on villi length in the TPN+Glycine and TPN+Glutamine groups were significantly lower than villus length determined for the TPN+Ornithine group. 
     These results indicate ornithine is important in maintaining the intestinal epithelium. 
     Those of skill in the art will recognize that, although the present invention is disclosed in terms of specific embodiments, one may depart from such embodiments and still remain within the scope of the invention. All such departures are considered to be within the scope of pending claims.
Disclosed are total parenteral nutrition formulations which include essential amino acids in combination with either arginine or ornithine, for use in detection of recurrent malignant disease in patients. Such formulations stimulate tumor-specific polyamine production to a greater extent than non-tumor related polyamine production. Additionally, such formulations were found to specifically promote an increase in red block cell putrescine levels of tumor-bearing rats. Nontumor-bearing rats were not found to be similarly reactive to these formulations. Methods for making and administering these formulations as well as their use in preventing DFMO-induced toxicity are also disclosed. The present invention also comprises formulations for use in the rejuvinatio BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The government may own certain rights in the present invention pursuant to NCI grant RDI CA3 4-465 and NCI grant ROI CA3 4-465.