CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS  
       [0001]     This application is a continuation of PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/EP04/000149, filed on Jan. 9, 2004, designating the United States of America, and published, in English, as PCT International Publication No. WO 2004/063386 A2 on Jul. 29, 2004, which application claims priority to European Patent Application Serial No. 03075091.3 filed on Jan. 10, 2003, the contents of the entirety of each are incorporated herein by this reference. 
     
    
     TECHNICAL FIELD  
       [0002]     The invention relates to methods to select animals, such as mammals, in particular, domestic animals such as breeding animals or animals destined for slaughter for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties, in particular, related to muscle mass and/or fat deposition or, in the case of mammals, to teat number. Herein, a domestic animal is defined as an animal being purposely selected or having been derived from an animal having been purposely selected for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties.  
       BACKGROUND  
       [0003]     Domestic animals provide a rich resource of genetic and phenotypic variation. Traditionally, domestication involves selecting an animal or its offspring for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties. This selection process has in the past century been facilitated by growing understanding and utilization of the laws of Mendelian inheritance. One of the major problems in breeding programs of domestic animals is the negative genetic correlation between reproductive capacity and production traits. This is, for example, the case in cattle (a high milk production generally results in slim cows and bulls), poultry (broiler lines have a low level of egg production and layers have generally very low muscle growth), pigs (very prolific sows are in general fat and have comparatively less meat), or sheep (high prolific breeds have low carcass quality and vice versa). WO 00/36143 provides a method for selecting an animal for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising testing the animal for the presence of a parentally imprinted qualitative or quantitative trait locus (QTL). Knowledge of the parental imprinting character of various traits allows selection of, for example, sire lines homozygous for a paternally imprinted QTL, for example, linked with muscle production or growth; the selection for such traits can thus be less stringent in dam lines in favor of the reproductive quality. The phenomenon of genetic or parental imprinting has never been earlier utilized in selecting domestic animals, nor was it ever considered feasible to employ this elusive genetic characteristic in practical breeding programs. A breeding program, wherein knowledge of the parental imprinting character of a desired trait as demonstrated herein is utilized, increases the accuracy of the breeding value estimation and speeds up selection compared to conventional breeding programs. For example, selecting genes characterized by paternal imprinting is provided to help increase uniformity; a (terminal) parent homozygous for the “good or wanted” alleles will pass them to all offspring, regardless of the other parent&#39;s alleles, and the offspring will all express the desired parent&#39;s alleles. This results in more uniform offspring.  
         [0004]     Alleles that are interesting or favorable from the maternal side are often the ones that have opposite effects to alleles from the paternal side. For example, in meat animals, such as pigs, alleles linked with meat or carcass quality traits, such as—intramuscular fat or muscle mass, could be fixed in the dam lines while alleles linked with reduced back fat could be fixed in the sire lines. Other desirable combinations are, for example, fertility, teat number and/or milk yield in the female line with increased growth rates, reduced back fat and/or increased muscle mass in the male lines. The purpose of breeding programs in livestock is to enhance the performances of animals by improving their genetic composition.  
         [0005]     In essence, this improvement accrues by increasing the frequency of the most favorable alleles for the genes influencing the performance characteristics of interest. These genes are referred to as QTL. Until the beginning of the nineties, genetic improvement was achieved via the use of biometrical methods, but without molecular knowledge of the underlying QTL. Now, the identification of causative mutations for Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) is a major hurdle in genetic studies of multifactorial traits and disorders. The imprinted IGF2-linked QTL is one of the major porcine QTLs for body composition. It was first identified in intercrosses between the European Wild Boar and Large White domestic pigs and between Piétrain and Large White pigs (1, 2). The data showed that alleles from the Large White and Piétrain breeds, respectively, were associated with increased muscle mass and reduced back-fat thickness, consistent with the existing breed-differences in the two crosses. A paternally expressed IGF2-linked QTL was subsequently documented in intercrosses between Chinese Meishan and Large White/Landrace pigs (3) and between Berkshire and Large White pigs (4). In both cases, the allele for high muscle mass was inherited from the lean Large White/Landrace breed. However, there is a large number of potentially important elements that may influence IGF2 function. Recent sequence analysis (Amarger et al. 2002) provided a partial sequence of the INS-IGF2-H19 region and revealed as many as 97 conserved elements between human and pig.  
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
       [0006]     The invention provides a method for selecting an animal for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising testing the animal for the presence of a qualitative or quantitative trait locus (QTL). Here, it is shown that a paternally expressed QTL affecting muscle mass, fat deposition and teat number is caused by a single nucleotide substitution in intron 3 of IGF2. The mutation occurs in an evolutionary conserved CpG island that is hypomethylated in skeletal muscle (SEQ ID NO: 1). The function of the conserved CpG island was not known before. IGF2-intron3-nt3072 is part of the evolutionary conserved CpG island with a regulatory function, located between Differentially Methylated Region 1 (DMR1) and a matrix attachment region previously defined in mice (11-13). The 94 bp sequence around the mutation shows about 85% sequence identity to both human and mouse and the wild-type nucleotide at IGF2-intron3-nt3072 is conserved among the three species ( FIG. 4A ). A qualitative trait nucleotide (QTN) occurs three bp downstream of an eight bp palindrome also conserved between the three species. The methylation status of the 300 bp fragment centered on IGF2-intron3-nt3072 and containing 50 CpG dinucleotides was examined by bisulphite sequencing in four month old Q pat /q mat  and q pat /Q mat  animals. In skeletal muscle, paternal and maternal chromosomes were shown to be essentially unmethylated (including the IGF2-intron3-nt3071 C residue) irrespective of the QTL genotype of the individual (3.4% of CpGs methylated on average;  FIG. 5A ). The CpG island was more heavily and also differentially methylated in liver; 33% of the CpGs were methylated on the maternal alleles versus 19% on the paternal allele. Unexpectedly, therefore, this CpG island behaves as a previously unidentified DMR in liver, the repressed maternal allele being more heavily methylated than the paternal allele, which is the opposite of what is documented for the adjacent DMR1 in the mouse. To further uncover a function for this element, electrophoretic mobility shift analyses (EMSA) were performed using 27 bp oligonucleotides spanning the QTN and corresponding to the wild-type (q) and mutant (O) sequences. Nuclear extracts from murine C2C12 myoblast cells, human HEK293 cells, and human HepG2 cells were incubated with radioactively labeled q or Q oligonucleotides.  
         [0007]     One specific band shift (complex C1 in  FIG. 5B ) was obtained with the wild-type (q) but not the mutant (O) probe using extracts from C2C12 myoblasts; similar results were obtained using both methylated and unmethylated probes. A band shift with approximately the same but weaker migration was also detected in extracts from HEK293 and HepG2 cells. The specificity of the complex was confirmed since competition was obtained with ten-fold molar excess of unlabeled q probe, whereas a 50-fold excess of unlabeled Q probe did not achieve competition ( FIG. 5B ). Thus, the wild-type sequence binds a nuclear factor and this interaction is abrogated by the mutation. This also means that there could be other mutations in this region that are important in pigs or other species.  
         [0008]     Furthermore, the data show that the CpG island contains both Enhancer and Silencer functions so that there may be several nuclear factors binding to this CpG island except for the one already shown here. The results provide a method for isolating such nuclear factors and a stretch of oligonucleotides that can be used to fish out such proteins. Pigs carrying the mutation have a three-fold increase in IGF2 mRNA expression in postnatal muscle. The mutation abrogates in vitro interaction with a nuclear factor, most likely a repressor. The mutation has experienced a selective sweep in several pig breeds.  
         [0009]     As described in the detailed description herein, a haplotype sharing approach was used to refine the map position of the QTL (5). It was assumed that a new allele (O) promoting muscle development occurred g generations ago on a chromosome carrying the wild-type allele (q). It was also assumed that the favorable allele has gone through a selective sweep due to the strong selection for lean growth in commercial pig populations. Twenty-eight chromosomes with known QTL status were identified by marker-assisted segregation analysis using cross-bred Piétrain and Large White boars. All 19 Q-bearing chromosomes shared a haplotype in the 90 kilobase pairs (kb) interval between the microsatellites PULGE1 and SWC9 (IGF2 3′-UTR), which was not present among the q chromosomes and was, therefore, predicted to contain the QTL. In contrast, the nine q chromosomes exhibited six distinct marker haplotypes in the same interval. This region is part of the CDKN1C-H19 imprinted domain and contains INS and IGF2 as the only known paternally expressed genes. With this insight, the invention provides a method for selecting an animal for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising testing the animal, a parent of the animal or its progeny for the presence of a nucleic acid modification affecting the activity of an evolutionary conserved CpG island, located in intron 3 of an IGF2 gene and/or affecting binding of a nuclear factor to an IGF2 gene.  
         [0010]     In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides a method for selecting an animal for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising testing a nucleic acid sample from the animal for the presence of a single nucleotide substitution. A nucleic acid sample can, in general, be obtained from various parts of the animal&#39;s body by methods known in the art. Traditional samples for the purpose of nucleic acid testing are blood samples or skin or mucosal surface samples, but samples from other tissues can be used as well, in particular, sperm samples, oocyte or embryo samples can be used. In such a sample, the presence and/or sequence of a specific nucleic acid, be it DNA or RNA, can be determined with methods known in the art, such as hybridization or nucleic acid amplification or sequencing techniques known in the art. The invention also provides testing such a sample for the presence of nucleic acid, wherein the QTN or allele associated therewith is associated with the phenomenon of parental imprinting, for example, where it is determined whether a paternal or maternal allele comprising the QTN is capable of being predominantly expressed in the animal.  
         [0011]     In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides a method wherein the nuclear factor is capable of binding to a stretch of nucleotides, which, in the wild-type pig, mouse or human IGF2 gene, is part of an evolutionary conserved CpG island, located in intron 3 of the IGF2 gene. Binding should preferably be located at a stretch of nucleotides spanning a QTN (qualitative trait nucleotide) that comprises a nucleotide (preferably a G to A) transition, which, in the pig, is located at IGF2-intron3-nt3072. It is preferred that the stretch is functionally equivalent to the sequence as shown in  FIG. 4  that comprises the sequence 5′-GATCCTTCGCCTAGGCTC(A/G)CAGCGCGGGAGCGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:1) identifying the overlap with the QTN, whereby functional equivalence preferably entails that the stretch is spanning the QTN, and preferably overlaps with at least two or three nucleotides at or on both sides of the QTN, although the overlaps may be longer.  
         [0012]     Functional equivalence also entails a sequence homology of at least 50%, preferably at least 60%, more preferably at least 70%, even more preferably at least 80%, most preferred at least 90% of the stretch overlapping the QTN. The stretch is preferably from at least 5 to about 94 nucleotides long, more preferably from about 10 to 50, most preferably from about 15 to 35 nucleotides, and it is preferred that it comprises a palindromic octamer sequence as identified in  FIG. 4 .  
         [0013]     In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides a method wherein the nucleic acid modification comprises a nucleotide substitution, whereby in the pig, the substitution comprises a G to A transition at IGF2-intron3-nt3072 (SEQ ID NO:6 and SEQ ID NO:5). Abrogating or reducing binding of the nuclear factor to the IGF2 gene allows for modulating IGF2 mRNA transcription in a cell provided (naturally or by recombinant means) with the gene.  
         [0014]     To further characterize the functional significance of the IGF2 Q mutation, its effect on transcription was studied by employing a transient transfection assay in mouse C2C12 myoblasts. Q and q constructs were made containing a 578 bp fragment from the actual region inserted in front of a Luciferase reporter gene driven by the herpes thymidine kinase (TK) minimal promoter. The two constructs differed only by the IGF2-intron3-nt3072G→A transition. The ability of the IGF2 fragments to activate transcription from the heterologous promoter was compared with the activity of the TK-promoter alone.  
         [0015]     The presence of the q-construct caused a two-fold increase of transcription, whereas the Q-construct caused a significantly higher, seven-fold, increase ( FIG. 5C ). The interpretation of this result, in light of the results from the EMSA experiment, is that the Q mutation abrogates the interaction with a repressor protein that modulates the activity of a putative IGF2 enhancer present in this CpG island. This view is consistent with our in silico identification of potential binding sites for both activators and repressors in this intronic DNA fragment (14).  
         [0016]     The in vivo effect of the mutation on IGF2 expression was studied in a purpose-built Q/q×Q/q intercross counting 73 offspring. As a deletion encompassing DMR0, DMR1, and the associated CpG island derepresses the maternal IGF2 allele in mesodermal tissues in the mouse (12), the effect of the intron3-nt3072 mutation on IGF2 imprinting in the pig was tested. This was achieved by monitoring transcription from the paternal and maternal IGF2 alleles in tissues of q/q, Q pat /q mat , and q pat /Q mat  animals that were heterozygous for the SWC9 microsatellite located in the IGF2 3′UTR. Imprinting could not be studied in Q/Q animals that were all homozygous for SWC9. Before birth, IGF2 was shown to be expressed exclusively from the paternal allele in skeletal muscle and kidney, irrespective of the QTL genotype of the fetuses. At four months of age, weak expression from the maternal allele was observed in skeletal muscle, however, at comparable rates for all three QTL genotypes ( FIG. 6A ). Only the paternal allele could be detected in four-month-old kidney (data not shown). Consequently, the mutation does not seem to affect the imprinting status of IGF2. The partial derepression of the maternal allele in skeletal muscle of all QTL genotypes may, however, explain why in a previous study, muscular development was found to be slightly superior in q pat /Q mat  versus q/q animals, and in Q/Q versus Q pat /q mat  animals (2).  
         [0017]     The Q allele was expected to be associated with an increased IGF2 expression since IGF2 stimulates myogenesis (6). To test this, the relative mRNA expression of IGF2 was monitored at different ages in the Q/q×Q/q intercross using both Northern blot analysis and real-time PCR ( FIGS. 6B  and C). The expression levels in fetal muscle and postnatal liver was about ten-fold higher than in postnatal muscle. No significant difference was observed in fetal samples or in postnatal liver samples, but a significant three-fold increase of postnatal IGF2 mRNA expression in skeletal muscle was observed in (Q/Q or Q pat /q mat ) versus (q pat /Q mat  or q/q) progeny. Herewith, the invention provides a method for modulating mRNA transcription of an IGF2 gene in a cell or organism provided with the gene comprising modulating binding of a nuclear factor to an IGF2 gene, in particular, wherein the nuclear factor is capable of binding to a stretch of nucleotides (as identified above) that in the wild-type pig, mouse or human IGF2 gene is part of an evolutionary conserved CpG island, located in intron 3 of the IGF2 gene. The significant difference in IGF2 expression revealed by real-time PCR was confirmed using two different internal controls, GAPDH ( FIG. 6C ) and HPRT (15). An increase of all detected transcripts originating from the three promoters (P2-P4) located downstream of the mutated site was found. Combined, these results provide strong evidence for IGF2 being the causative gene. The lack of significant differences in IGF2 mRNA expression in fetal muscle and postnatal liver are consistent with the previous QTL study showing no effect of the IGF2 locus on birth weight and weight of liver (2).  
         [0018]     Accordingly, a method according to the invention is herein provided allowing testing for, and modulation of, desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising muscle mass, fat deposition or teat numbers (of mammals). Such testing is applicable in man and animals alike (animals herein defined as including humans). In humans, it is, for example, worthwhile to test for the presence for the presence of a nucleic acid modification affecting the activity of an evolutionary conserved CpG island, located in intron 3 of an IGF2 gene or affecting binding of a nuclear factor to an IGF2 gene, as provided herein, to test, for example, the propensity or genetic predisposition or likelihood of muscle growth or muscularity in humans versus propensity or genetic predisposition or the likelihood of obesity. In domestic animals, such testing may be undertaken to select the best or most suitable animals for breeding, or to preselect domestic animals destined for slaughter. An additional trait to be selected for concerns teat number, a quality highly valued in sow lines to allow for suckling large litters. A desirable breeding combination as provided herein comprises, for example, increased teat number in the female line with increased growth rates, reduced back fat and/or increased muscle mass in the male lines. It is herein also shown that the mutation influences teat number. The Q allele that is favorable with respect to muscle mass and reduced back fat is the unfavorable allele for teat number. This strengthens the possibility of using the paternal imprinting character of this QTL in breeding programs. Selecting maternal lines for the q allele will enhance teat number, a characteristic that is favorable for the maternal side. On the other hand, paternal lines can be selected for the Q allele that will increase muscle mass and reduce back fat, characteristics that are of more importance in the paternal lines. Terminal sires that are homozygous QQ will pass the full effect of increased muscle mass and reduced back fat to the slaughter pigs, while selection of parental sows that express the q allele will allow for the selection of sows that have more teats and suckle more piglets without affecting slaughter quality.  
         [0019]     The invention also provides a method for identifying a compound capable of modulating mRNA transcription of an IGF2 gene in a cell or organism provided with the gene comprising providing a first cell or organism having a nucleic acid modification affecting the activity of an evolutionary conserved CpG island, located in intron 3 of an IGF2 gene and/or affecting binding of a nuclear factor to an IGF2 gene and a second cell or organism not having the modification further comprising providing the first or second cell or organism with a test compound and determining IGF2 mRNA transcription in the first and second cell or organism and selecting a compound capable of modulating IGF2 mRNA transcription. An example of such a compound as identifiable herewith comprises a stretch of oligonucleotides spanning a QTN (qualitative trait nucleotide) that comprises a nucleotide (preferably a G to A) transition, which in the pig, is located at IGF2-intron3-nt3072. It is preferred that the stretch is functionally equivalent to the sequence as shown in  FIG. 4  that comprises the sequence 5′-GATCCTTCGCCTAGGCTC(A/G)CAGCGCGGGAGCGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:1) identifying the overlap with the QTN, whereby functional equivalence preferably entails that the stretch is spanning the QTN and preferably overlaps with at least two or three nucleotides at or on both sides of the QTN, although the overlaps may be longer. Functional equivalence also entails a sequence homology of at least 50%, preferably at least 60%, more preferably at least 70%, even more preferably at least 80%, most preferred at least 90%, of the stretch overlapping the QTN. The stretch is preferably from at least 5 to at about 94 nucleotides long, more preferably from about 10 to 50, most preferably from about 15 to 35 nucleotides, and it is preferred that it comprises a palindromic octamer sequence as identified in  FIG. 4 . An alternative compound as provided herein comprises a functional analogue of the stretch, the alternative compound or oligonucleotide analogue functionally at least capable of modulating the activity of an evolutionary conserved CpG island, located in intron 3 of an IGF2 gene and/or modulating binding of a nuclear factor to an IGF2 gene, preferably effecting modulation at the site of the QTN. In electrophoretic mobility shift analyses (EMSA), such compounds, e.g., the identified nuclear factor in  FIG. 2 , or compounds competing with the binding of the factor to the IGF2 gene, can be further identified and selected. A typical example of such an EMSA is given in the detailed description. It is preferred that the nuclear factor is capable of binding to a stretch of nucleotides that in the wild-type pig, mouse or human IGF2 gene, is part of an evolutionary conserved CpG island, located in intron 3 of the IGF2 gene. Oligonucleotide compounds or probes spanning the QTN are herein provided that have the desired effect. Such compounds or probes are preferably functionally equivalent to the sequence 5′-GATCCTTCGCCTAGGCTC(A/G)CAGCGCGGGAGCGA-3′(SEQ ID NO: 1).  
         [0020]     The invention also provides a method for identifying a compound capable of affecting the activity of an evolutionary conserved CpG island, located in intron 3 of an IGF2 gene and/or modulating binding of a nuclear factor to an IFG2 gene comprising providing a stretch of nucleotides that in the wild-type pig, mouse or human IGF2 gene, is part of an evolutionary conserved CpG island, located in intron 3 of the IGF2 gene. Such testing may be done with single oligonucleotides or analogues thereof, or with a multitude of such oligonucleotides or analogues in an array fashion, and may further comprise providing a mixture of DNA-binding proteins derived from a nuclear extract of a cell and testing these with the array or analogue or oligonucleotide under study. Testing may be done as well with test compounds provided either singularly or in an array fashion and optionally further comprises providing a test compound and determining competition of binding of the mixture of DNA-binding proteins to the stretch of nucleotides in the presence or absence of test compound(s). To find active compounds for further study or, eventually, for pharmaceutical use, it suffices to select a compound capable of inhibiting binding of the mixture to the stretch, wherein the stretch is functionally equivalent to the sequence 5′-GATCCTTCGCCTAGGCTC(A/G)CAGCGCGGGAGCGA-3′(SEQ ID NO: 1).  
         [0021]     The invention thus provides a compound identifiable with a method as described herein. Such a compound is, for example, derived from a stretch of oligonucleotides spanning a QTN (qualitative trait nucleotide) that comprises a nucleotide (preferably a G to A) (SEQ ID NO:6 and SEQ ID NO:5) transition, which in the pig, is located at IGF2-intron3-nt3072. It is preferred that the stretch is functionally equivalent to the sequence as shown in  FIG. 4  that comprises the sequence 5′-GATCCTTCGCCTAGGCTC(A/G)CAGCGCGGGAGCGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:1) identifying the overlap with the QTN, whereby functional equivalence preferably entails that the stretch is spanning the QTN, and preferably overlaps with at least two or three nucleotides at or on both sides of the QTN, although the overlaps may be longer.  
         [0022]     Also, functional equivalence entails a sequence homology of at least 50%, preferably at least 60%, more preferably at least 70%, even more preferably at least 80%, most preferred at least 90% of the stretch overlapping the QTN. The oligonucleotide compound is preferably from at least 5 to at about 94 nucleotides long, more preferably from about 10 to 50, most preferably from about 10 to 35 nucleotides, and it is preferred that it comprises a palindromic octamer sequence as identified in  FIG. 4 . An alternative compound or functional analogue as provided herein comprises a functional analogue of the oligonucleotide compound, the alternative compound or oligonucleotide analogue functionally at least capable of modulating the activity of an evolutionary conserved CpG island, located in intron 3 of an IGF2 gene and/or modulating binding of a nuclear factor to an IGF2 gene, preferably effecting the modulation at the site of the QTN. For example, in electrophoretic mobility shift analyses (EMSA), such compounds, e.g., the identified nuclear factor in  FIG. 2 , or compounds competing with the binding of the factor to the IGF2 gene, can be further identified and selected. A typical example of such an EMSA is given in the detailed description. The invention also provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound as provided herein, and use of such a compound, for the production of a pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of obesity or for the treatment of muscle deficiencies. Furthermore, the invention provides a method for modulating mRNA transcription of an IGF2 gene in a cell or organism provided with the gene comprising treating or providing the cell or organism with a compound as provided herein.  
         [0023]     There has been a strong selection for lean growth (high muscle mass and low fat content) in commercial pig populations in Europe and North America during the last 50 years. Therefore, how this selection pressure has affected the allele frequency distribution of the IGF2 QTL was investigated. The causative mutation was absent in a small sample of European and Asian Wild Boars and in several breeds that have not been strongly selected for lean growth (Table 1). In contrast, the causative mutation was found at high frequencies in breeds that have been subjected to strong selection for lean growth. The only exceptions were the experimental Large White population at the Roslin Institute that was founded from commercial breeding stocks in the UK around 1980 (16) as well as the experimental Large White populations used for the Piétrain/Large White intercross (1). These two populations thus reflect the status in some commercial populations about 20 years ago and it is possible that the IGF2*Q allele is even more predominant in contemporary populations. The results demonstrate that IGF2*Q has experienced a selective sweep in several major commercial pig populations and it has apparently been spread between breeds by cross-breeding.  
         [0024]     The results have important practical implications. The IGF2*Q mutation increases the amount of meat produced, at the expense of fat, by 3-4 kg for an animal slaughtered at the usual weight of about 100 kg. The high frequency of IGF2*Q among major pig breeds implies that this mutation affects the productivity of many millions of pigs in the Western world. The development of a simple diagnostic DNA test now facilitates the introgression of this mutation to additional breeds. This could be an attractive way to improve productivity in local breeds as a measure to maintain biological diversity. The diagnostic test will also make it possible to investigate if the IGF2*Q mutation is associated with any unfavorable effects on meat quality or any other trait. It has been previously demonstrated that European and Asian pigs were domesticated from different subspecies of the Wild Boar, and that Asian germplasm has been introgressed into European pig breeds (17). The IGF2*Q mutation apparently occurred on an Asian chromosome as it showed a very close relationship to the haplotype carried by Chinese Meishan pigs. This explains the large genetic distance observed between Q- and q-haplotypes ( FIG. 4 ). However, it is an open question whether the Q mutation occurred before after the Asian chromosome was introduced into European pigs.  
         [0025]     This study provides new insights in IGF2 biology. The role of IGF2 on prenatal development is well documented (18, 19). The observation demonstrates that the Q mutation does not upregulate IGF2 expression in fetal tissue but, after birth, demonstrates that IGF2 has an important role for regulating postnatal myogenesis. The finding that the sequence around the mutation does not match any known DNA-binding site shows that this sequence binds an earlier unknown nuclear factor (14). The results also imply that pharmacological intervention of the interaction between this DNA segment and the corresponding nuclear factor opens up new strategies for promoting muscle growth in humans such as patients with muscle deficiencies or for stimulating muscle development at the cost of adipose tissue in obese patients.  
         [0026]     Applications of these insights are manifold. Applications in animals typically include diagnostic tests of the specific causative mutation in the pig and diagnostic tests of these and possible other mutations in this CpG island in humans, pigs or other meat-producing animals.  
         [0027]     It is now also possible to provide for transgenic animals with modified constitution of this CpG island or with modified expression of nuclear factors interacting with this sequence, and the invention provides the use of pharmaceutical compounds (including oligonucleotides) or vaccination to modulate IGF2 expression by interfering with the interaction between nuclear factors and the CpG island provided herein. Thus, instead of selecting animals, one may treat the animals with a drug, if not for producing meat, then at least in experimental animals for studying the therapeutic effects of the compounds.  
         [0028]     In humans, diagnostic tests of mutations predisposing to diabetes, obesity or muscle deficiency are particularly provided and pharmaceutical intervention to treat diabetes, obesity or muscle deficiency by modulating IGF2 expression based on interfering with the interaction between nuclear factors and the CpG island as provided herein is typically achievable with compounds, such as the above-identified nucleotide stretches or functional analogues thereof as provided herein. 
     
    
     DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES  
       [0029]      FIG. 1 : QTL genotyping by marker-assisted segregation analysis. The graphs show, for 14 paternal half-sib pedigrees (P1, P2, . . . P14), the phenotypic mean±2 standard errors of the offspring sorted into two groups according to the homologue inherited from the sire. The number of offspring in each group is given above and below the error bars, respectively. The upper graph corresponds to the boars that were shown to be heterozygous “Qq” for the QTL, the lower graph to the boars that were shown to be homozygous at the QTL. Pedigrees for which the percentage of lean meat was measured as “% lean cuts” (N EZER  et al. 2002) are marked by L(eft axis), those for which “Piglog” was used (see M&amp;M) are marked by R(ight axis). The graph reports a Z-score for each pedigree, i.e., the log10 of the H 1 /H 0  likelihood ratio where H 1  assumes that the boar is heterozygous “Qq” for the QTL, while H 0  assumes that the boar is homozygous “QQ” or “qq.” “Q” alleles associated with a positive allele substitution effect on the percentage of lean meat are marked by a diamond, “q” alleles by a circle. The number within the symbols differentiates the “Q” and “q” alleles according to the associated marker haplotype (see results of Example 1 and  FIG. 2 ).  
         [0030]      FIG. 2 : A. Schematic representation of the human 11p15 imprinted domain according to Onyango et al. (2000). B. BAC contig spanning the porcine orthologue of the 11p15 imprinted domain, assembled by STS content mapping. The length of the horizontal bars does not reflect the actual physical size of the corresponding BACs. C. Marker haplotypes of the five “Q” chromosomes (diamonds) and six “q” chromosomes (circles). Closely linked SNPs (&lt;5 kb) were merged into poly-allelic multisite haplotypes (cfr. Table 2). The chromosome segments highlighted in green correspond to the haplotype shared by all “Q” chromosomes and, therefore, assumed to contain the QTL. The chromosome segment highlighted in red corresponds to a haplotype shared by chromosome “q 4 ” and chromosomes “Q 1−4 ” that, therefore, excludes the QTL out of this region. The resulting most likely position of the QTL is indicated by the arrow.  
         [0031]      FIG. 3 : Average probability for two chromosomes to be identical-by-descent at a given map position conditional on flanking marker data (p(IBD|MG)), along the chromosome segment encompassing the p57-H19 imprinted domain, computed according to M EUWISSEN  and G ODDARD  (2001). The positions of the markers defined according to Tables 1 and 2 are shown by the vertical dotted lines.  
         [0032]      FIG. 4 : (A) DNA sequence polymorphisms identified in a 28.6 kb segment spanning the porcine TH (exon 14), INS and IGF2 genes. The average (C+G) content of a moving 100-bp window is shown on a gray scale (black 100%, white 0%). The positions of evolutionary conserved regions (7) including the DMR1 and associated CpG island in IGF2 intron 3 are marked by horizontal cylinders. The Viewgene program (25) was used to highlight the 258 differences between the reference Q P208 sequence, four Q, and ten q chromosomes. The position of the causative intron3-nt3072G→A mutation is marked by an asterisk. The sequence context of the conserved footprint surrounding intron3-nt3072 is shown for pig, human, and mouse. The conserved palindromic octamer sequence is underlined. P=Piétrain; LW=Large White; LR=Landrace; H=Hampshire; M=Meishan; EWB=European Wild Boar; JWB=Japanese Wild Boar. (B) Neighbor-Joining tree of 18,560 bp of the porcine IGF2 gene based on 15 sequences classified as representing q and Q alleles. The analysis was restricted to the region from IGF2 intron 1 to SWC9 in the 3′UTR to avoid problems with the presence of recombinant haplotypes. The tree was constructed using MEGA version 2.1 (26) and positions with insertions/deletions were excluded. Bootstrap values (after 1000 replicates) are reported on the nodes.  
         [0033]      FIG. 5 : (A) Percentage methylation determined by bisulphite sequencing for the 300 bp fragment centered around intron3-nt3072, containing 50 CpG dinucleotides, in liver and skeletal muscle of four-month-old Q pat /q mat  and q pat /Q mat  individuals. The number of analyzed chromosomes as well as the standard errors of the estimated means are given. Pat and Mat refer to the paternal and maternal alleles, respectively, determined based on the intron3-nt3072G→A mutation. (B) Electrophoretic mobility shift analyses (EMSA) using 10 μg nuclear extracts (N.E.) from mouse C2C12 myoblast cells, human HEK293 embryonic kidney cells, and human HepG2 hepatocytes. The q and Q oligonucleotide probes corresponded to the wild-type and mutant sequences, respectively. Competition was carried out with a 50-fold excess of cold nucleotide. Complex 1 (C1) was specific and exclusively detected with the q probe. C2 was also specific and stronger in q but probably present also with the Q probe. C3 was unspecific. (C) Luciferase assays of reporter constructs using the TK promoter. The pig IGF2 fragments (Q and q) contained 578 bp from intron 3 (nucleotide 2868 to 3446) including the causative G to A transition at nucleotide 3072. The relative activities compared with the basic TK-LUC vector are reported as means±standard errors based on triplicate experiments. A student&#39;s t-test revealed highly significant differences for all pairwise comparisons; ***=P&lt;0.001.  
         [0034]      FIG. 6 : Analysis of IGF2 mRNA expression. (A) Imprinting analysis of IGF2 in skeletal muscle of qq, Q Pat /q Mat , and q Pat /Q Mat  animals before birth and at four months of age. The QTL and SWC9 genotypes of the analyzed animals are given. In these, the first allele is paternal, the second maternal. The lanes corresponding to PCR product obtained from genomic DNA are marked by continuous lines, those corresponding to RT-PCR products by the dotted lines. The three SWC9 alleles segregating in the pedigree (1, 2, and 8) are marked by arrows. The RT-PCR controls without reverse transcriptase were negative (not shown). (B) Northern blot analysis of skeletal muscle poly(A) +  RNA from three-week-old piglets using IGF2 and GAPDH probes. Animals 1-4 and 5-8 carried a paternal IGF2*Q or *q allele, respectively. P3 and P4 indicate the IGF2 promoter usage and the superscripts a and b indicate the alternative polyadenylation signal used. All four IGF2 transcripts showed a significantly higher relative expression (standardized using GAPDH expression) in the *Q group (P&lt;0.05, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, two sided). (C) Results of real-time PCR analysis of IGF2 mRNA expression in skeletal muscle and liver at different developmental phases of pigs carrying paternal IGF2*Q (gray staples) or *q (white staples) alleles. The expression levels were normalized using GAPDH as internal control. Means±SE are given, n=3-11.*=P&lt;0.05, **=P&lt;0.01, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, two sided. No significant differences in IGF2 expression levels between genotypes were found in fetal (80 days of gestation) or liver tissues (three weeks). w, week; mo, month. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION  
     EXAMPLE 1  
       [0035]     Haplotype sharing refines the location of an imprinted QTL with major effect on muscle mass to a 90 Kb chromosome segment containing the porcine IGF2 gene.  
         [0036]     Herein described is the fine-mapping of an imprinted QTL with major effect on muscle mass that was previously assigned to proximal SSC2 in the pig. The proposed approach exploits linkage disequilibrium in combination with QTL genotyping by marker-assisted segregation analysis. By identifying a haplotype shared by all “Q” chromosomes and absent amongst “q” chromosomes, the QTL to a ≈90 Kb chromosome segment containing INS and IGF2 was mapped as the only known paternally expressed genes. QTL mapping has become a preferred approach towards the molecular dissection of quantitative traits, whether of fundamental, medical or agronomic importance. A multitude of chromosomal locations predicted to harbor genes influencing traits of interest have been identified using this strategy (e.g. M ACKAY  2001; A NDERSSON  2001; F LINT  and M OTT  2001; M AURICIO  2001). In most cases, however, the mapping resolution is in the order of the tens of centimorgans, which is insufficient for positional cloning of the underlying genes. High-resolution mapping of QTL, therefore, remains one of the major challenges in the genetic analysis of complex traits.  
         [0037]     Three factors limit the achievable mapping resolution: marker density, cross-over density, and the ability to deduce QTL genotype from phenotype.  
         [0038]     Increasing marker density may still be time consuming in most organisms but is conceptually the simplest bottleneck to resolve. Two options are available to increase the local cross-over density: breed recombinants de novo or exploit historical recombination events, i.e., use linkage disequilibrium (LD). The former approach is generally used with model organisms that have a short generation time (e.g., D ARVASI  1998), while the latter is the only practical alternative when working with human or large livestock species. Optimal use of LD to fine-map QTL in outbred populations is presently an area of very active research (e.g., A RDLIE  et al. 2002). The ability to deduce QTL genotype from phenotype can be improved by using “clones” (e.g., recombinant inbred lines) (e.g., D ARVASI  1998), by means of progeny-testing (e.g., G EORGES  et al. 1995), or by marker-assisted segregation analysis (e.g., R IQUET  et al. 1999).  
         [0039]     Recently, a QTL with major effect on muscle mass and fat deposition was mapped to the centromeric end of porcine chromosome SSC2 (N EZER  et al. 1999; J EON  et al. 1999). The most likely position of the QTL was shown to coincide with a chromosome region that is orthologous to HSA11p15 in the human, which is known to harbor an imprinted domain. The demonstration that the QTL was characterized by a clear parent-of-origin effect, strongly suggested that the underlying gene was imprinted and expressed only from the paternal allele. The human 11p15 imprinted domain is known to contain at least nine imprinted transcripts. Three of these are paternally expressed: LIT-1 (KVLQT1-AS), IGF2 and IGF2-AS (e.g., R EIK  and W ALTER  2001). Fifteen imprinted transcripts are known to map to the orthologous domain on distal mouse chromosome MMU7, of which four are paternally expressed: Lit-1 (Kvlqt1-as), Ins2, Igf2 and Igf2-as (e.g., http://www.mgu.har.mrc.ac.uk/imprinting/imprinting.html; O NYANGO et al.  2000). Because of its known function in myogenesis (F LORINI  et al. 1996), IGF2 stood out as a prime positional candidate.  
         [0040]     To refine the map position of this QTL and to verify whether its position remained compatible with a direct role of the INS and/or IGF2 genes, an approach was applied targeting the three factors limiting the mapping resolution of QTL: (i) a higher-density map of the corresponding chromosome region was generated; (ii) the QTL genotype of a number of individuals by marker-assisted segregation analysis was determined; and (iii) an LD-based haplotype sharing approach to determine the most likely position of the QTL was applied. This approach is analogous to the one that was previously applied by R IQUET  et al. (1999) to refine the map position of a QTL influencing milk production in dairy cattle. It makes the assumption that the observed QTL effect is due to the segregation of a QTL allele with major substitution effect (“Q”) that appeared by mutation or migration g generations ago, and swept through the populations as a result of artificial selection. As a consequence, at the present generation, n chromosomes carrying the “Q” allele are expected to share a haplotype of size ≈2/ng (in Morgan) containing the QTL (D UNNER  et al. 1997).  
         [0041]     By doing so, a shared haplotype spanning less than 90 Kb that is predicted to contain the Quantitative Trait Nucleotide (QTN: M ACKAY  2001) was identified. The corresponding chromosome segment contains INS and IGF2 as the only known paternally expressed genes. This considerably enforces the candidacy of these two genes and demonstrates that LD can be exploited to map QTL in outbred populations to chromosome intervals containing no more than a handful of genes.  
         [0000]     Materials and Methods  
         [0000]     Pedigree Material and Phenotypic Data  
         [0042]     The pedigree material used for this work comprised a subset of previously described Piétrain×Large White F2 pedigrees (N EZER  et al. 2000; H ANSET  et al. 1995), as well as a series of paternal half-sib pedigrees sampled in commercial lines derived from the Pietrain and Large White breeds (Buys, personal communication). In the F2 animals, “% lean cuts” was measured as previously described (H ANSET  et al. 1995), while in the commercial lines, the percentage of lean meat was measured as “Piglog” corresponding to (63.6882-0.4465 a-0.5096 b+0.1281 c) where a=mm backfat measured between the third and fourth lumbar vertebra at 7 cm from the spine, b=mm backfat measured between the third and fourth last rib at 7 cm from the spine, and c=mm loin thickness, measured at the same position as b.  
         [0000]     Marker-Assisted Segregation Analysis  
         [0043]     The QTL genotype of each sire was determined from the Z-score, corresponding to the log10 of the likelihood ratio L H     1   /L H     0   , where L H1  corresponds to the likelihood of the pedigree data assuming that the boar is of “Qq” genotype, and L H     0    corresponds to the likelihood of the pedigree data assuming that the boar is of “QQ” or “qq” genotype. The corresponding likelihoods were computed as:  
       L   =       ∏     i   =   1     n     ⁢       1         2   ⁢   π       ⁢   σ       ⁢     ⅇ       -       (       y   i     -     (       y   _     ±   a     )       )     2         2   ⁢     σ   2                   
 
 In this, n is the number of informative offspring in the corresponding pedigree, y i  is the phenotype of offspring i, {overscore (y)} is the average phenotype of the corresponding pedigree computed over all (informative and non-informative) offspring, σ is the residual standard deviation maximizing L, and a is the Q to q allele substitution effect. a was set at zero when computing L H     0   , and at +1% for “R” offspring and −1% for “L” offspring when computing L H1  (N EZER  et al. 1999). 
 
         [0044]     Boars were considered to be “Qq” when Z&gt;2, “QQ” or “qq” when Z&lt;−2 and of undetermined genotype if 2&gt;Z&gt;−2.  
         [0000]     Linkage Disequilibrium Analysis  
         [0045]     Probabilities for two chromosomes to be identical-by-descent (IBD) at a given map position conditional on flanking marker data were computed according to M EUWISSEN  and G ODDARD  (2001). The effective population size (N e ) was set at 200 based on estimates of N e  determined from LD data (Harmegnies, unpublished observations), and the number of generations to the base population at 20. A multipoint test for association was performed using the DISMULT program described in T ERWILLIGER  1995.  
         [0000]     Results  
         [0046]     QTL genotyping by marker-assisted segregation analysis: A series of paternal half-sib families was genotyped counting at least 20 offspring for two microsatellite markers located on the distal end of chromosome SSC2 and spanning the most likely position of the imprinted QTL: SWR2516 and SWC9 (N EZER  et al. 1999; J EON  et al. 1999). These families originated either from a previously described Piétrain×Large White F2 pedigree (N EZER  et al. 2002) or from two composite pig lines derived from Large White and Piétrain founder animals (Nadine Buys, personal communication).  
         [0047]     The pedigrees from sires which were heterozygous for one or both of these markers were kept for further analysis. Twenty such pedigrees could be identified for a total of 941 animals. Offspring were sorted in three classes based on their marker genotype: “L” (left homologue inherited from the sire), “R” (right homologue inherited from the sire), or “?” (not informative or recombinant in the SWR2516-SWC9 interval).  
         [0048]     Offspring were slaughtered at a constant weight of approximately 105 Kgs, and a series of phenotypes collected on the carcasses including “% lean meat,” measured either as lean cuts” (experimental cross) or as “Piglog” (composite lines) (see Materials &amp; Methods).  
         [0049]     The likelihood of each sire family was then computed under two hypotheses: H 0 , postulating that the corresponding boar was homozygous at the QTL and H 1 , postulating that the boar was heterozygous at the QTL. Assuming a bi-allelic QTL, H 0  corresponds to QTL genotypes “QQ” or “qq,” and H 1  to genotype “Qq.” Likelihoods were computed using “% lean meat” as phenotype (as the effect of the QTL was shown to be most pronounced on this trait in previous analyses) and assuming a Q to q allele substitution effect of 2.0% (N EZER  et al. 1999). If the odds in favor of one of the hypotheses were superior or equal to 100:1, the most likely hypothesis was considered to be true. Results are expressed as lod scores (z): the log 10  of the likelihood ratio H 1 /H 0 . Boars were considered to be of heterozygous “Qq” genotype if z was superior to 2, of homozygous “QQ” or “qq” genotype if z was inferior to −2, and of undetermined QTL genotype if −2&lt;z&lt;2. Using these rules, we could determine the QTL genotype for fourteen of the twenty boars. Seven of these proved to be heterozygous “Qq,” the other seven to be homozygous and, thus, either of “QQ” or “qq” genotype ( FIG. 1 ).  
         [0050]     Constructing a physical and genetic map of the porcine orthologue of the human 11p15 imprinted domain: The SWC9 marker was known from previous studies to correspond to a (CA) n  microsatellite located in the 3′UTR of the porcine IGF2 gene (N EZER  et al. 1999; J EON  et al. 1999; A MARGER  et al. 2002). A BLAST search was performed with the sequence of the porcine SWR2516 marker (gi|7643973|) against the sequence contigs spanning the human 11p15 imprinted domain (http://www.ensembl.org/ Homo   —   sapiens /). A highly significant similarity (expected value of 6×10 −5  calculated based on the size of the NCBI “nr” database) was found between SWR2516 and sequence contig AC001228 (gi|1935053|) at 3.3 Kb of the p57 gene. This suggested that the SWR2516-SWC9 marker interval in the pig might correspond to the p57-IGF2 interval of the human 11p15 imprinted domain.  
         [0051]     Porcine sequence tagged sites (STS) were then developed across the orthologous region of the human 11p15 imprinted domain. Sixteen of these were developed in genes (TSSC5, CD81, KVLQT1 (3×), TH (2×), INS (3×), IGF2 (3×), H19 (3×)), and five in intergenic regions (IG IGF2-H19 , IG H19-RL23mep (4×)). The corresponding primer sequences were derived from the porcine genomic sequence, when available (A MARGER  et al. 2002), or from porcine-expressed sequence tags (EST) that were identified by BLAST searches using the human orthologues as query sequences (Table 1).  
         [0052]     A porcine BAC library (F AHRENKRUG  et al. 2001) was screened by filter hybridization using (i) human cDNA clones corresponding to genes known to map to 11p15, as well as (ii) some of the 21 previously described porcine STS. Seven of the identified BACs were shown by PCR to contain at least one of the porcine STS available in the region and were kept for further analysis, together with two BACs that were previously shown to span the TH-H19 region (A MARGER  et al. 2002). Three additional STS were developed from BAC end sequences (389B2T7, 370C17T7, 370SP6). 370SP6 revealed a highly significant BLAST hit (expected value 10 −7 ) downstream from the ASCL2 gene providing an additional anchor point between the human and porcine sequence.  
         [0053]     Using STS content mapping, the BAC contig shown in  FIG. 2  was assembled. It confirms the overall conservation of gene order between human and pigs in this chromosome region and indicates that the gap remaining in the human sequence between the INS and ASCL2 genes may not be larger than 55 Kb.  
         [0054]     All available STS were then amplified from genomic DNA of the fourteen QTL genotyped boars (see above) and cycle-sequenced in order to identify DNA sequence polymorphisms. A total of 43 SNPs were identified: two in TSSC5, fifteen in KVLQT1, three in 389B2-T7, four in TH, seven in INS, four in IGF2, one in IG (IGF2-H19) , three in H19 and four in IG (H19-RL23MRP)  (Table 1).  
         [0055]     Three microsatellites were added to this marker list: one (KVLQT1-SSR) isolated from BAC 956B11 and two (PULGE1 and PULGE3) isolated from BAC 370.  
         [0056]     Assembling pools of “Q” versus “q” bearing chromosomes: To reconstruct the marker linkage phase of the fourteen QTL genotyped sires, for each boar, offspring were selected that were homozygous for the alternate paternal SWR2516-SWC9 haplotypes. These were genotyped for all SNPs and microsatellites available in the region and from these genotypes, the linkage phase of the boars was determined.  
         [0057]     For six of the seven boars, shown by marker-assisted segregation analysis to be of “Qq” genotype ( FIG. 1 ), the “Q” chromosomes associated with an increase in the percentage of lean meat proved to be identical-by-state (IBS) over their entire length. This haplotype was, therefore, referred to as “Q 1 .” The haplotype corresponding to the seventh “Q” chromosome (P7 in  FIG. 2 ) was different and referred to as “Q 2 .” For three of these sires, the haplotypes associated with a decrease in the percentage of lean meat proved to be completely IBS as well and were thus referred to as “q 1 .” The other four “q” chromosomes carried distinct haplotypes and were referred to as “q 2 ,” “q 3 ,” “q 4 ,” and “q 5 ” ( FIG. 2 ).  
         [0058]     The first boar that proved to be homozygous for the QTL by marker-assisted segregation analysis (P8) carried the “q 4 ” haplotype on one if its chromosomes. Its other haplotype, therefore, had to be of “q” genotype as well and was referred to as “q 6 .” 
         [0059]     Boar P9 appeared to be heterozygous “Q 1 /Q 2 .” Boars P10 and P11 carried the “Q 1 ” haplotype shared by six of the “Qq” boars. As a consequence, the other chromosomes of boars P10 and P11, which were IBS as well, were placed in the “Q” pool and referred to as “Q 3 .” Homozygous boar P12 carried haplotype “Q 2 .” As a consequence, its homologue was referred to as “Q 4 .” Following the same recursive procedure, boars P13 and P14 were identified as being, respectively, “Q 3 Q 4 ” and “Q 2 Q 5 .” 
         [0060]     The marker genotypes of the resulting five “Q” and five “q” chromosomes are shown in  FIG. 2 . In this figure, closely linked (&lt;5 Kb) SNPs were merged into a series of polyallelic multisite haplotypes. The correspondence between SNP genotype and haplotype number is given in Table 2.  
         [0061]     All “Q” chromosomes share a ≈90 Kb common haplotype encompassing the INS and IGF2 genes not present in the “q” chromosomes: Visual examination of the “Q” and “q” pools immediately reveals that all five chromosomes in the “Q” pool indeed share an IBS haplotype spanning the 389B2T7-IGF2 interval ( FIG. 2 ). Four of the five “Q” chromosomes (“Q 1 ,” “Q 2 ,” “Q 3 ” and “Q 4 ”) also carry a common haplotype in the proximal KVLQT1(I12)-(I7) interval, while the fifth one (“Q 5 ”) carries a completely different KVLQT1(I12)-(I7) haplotype. This strongly suggests an ancestral recombination between KVLQT1(I7) and 389B2T7. Likewise, three of the five “Q” chromosomes (“Q 1 ,” “Q 3 ,” “Q 4 ”) carry the same haplotype distal from IGF2, while the two remaining ones (“Q 2 ,” “Q 5 ”) are sharing a completely distinct one. Again, this is best explained by assuming an ancestral recombination event just proximal from the SWC9 microsatellite marker. These observations, therefore, strongly suggest that the hypothesized “Q” allele associated with an increase in “% lean meat” appeared by mutation or migration on a founder chromosome carrying the haplotype highlighted in  FIG. 2 , and that the QTL is located in the KVLQT1(I7)-SWC9 interval. At present, our best estimate of the size of this interval is of the order of 500 Kb ( FIG. 2 ).  
         [0062]     No such shared haplotype could be identified in the “q” pool. As expected under our model, the “q” pool exhibited a higher level of genetic diversity. The “q”-bearing chromosomes would indeed be older, having had ample opportunity to recombine, thereby increasing haplotype diversity. This can be quantified more accurately by computing the average pair-wise probability for “Q” and “q” chromosome to be IBD-conditional on flanking marker data, using the coalescent model developed by M EUWISSEN  and G ODDARD  (2001). As shown in  FIG. 3 , the average pair-wise IBD probability amongst the five “Q” chromosomes is superior to 0.4 over the entire KVLQT1(SSR)-IG (H19-RL23mrp)  interval and exceeds 0.9 in the PULGE3-IGF2 interval. For the “q” chromosomes, the equivalent parameter averages 0.25 in the same region. It is worthwhile noting, however, that even amongst “q” chromosomes, the average pair-wise IBD probability peaks just above 0.4 between TH and INS, which is thought to reflect a “q”-specific haplotype signature.  
         [0063]     It is noteworthy that chromosome “q 4 ” carries a KVLQT1(I12)-PULGE3 haplotype that is IBS with the ancestral “Q” haplotype in the KVLQTI(I12)-PULGE3 interval. The probability that this IBS status reflects IBD was estimated at 0.50 using the coalescent model of M EUWISSEN  and G ODDARD  (2001). Assuming IBD, this would position the QTL in the PULGE3-SWC9 interval, measuring less than 90 Kb and containing TH, INS and IGF2 as the only known genes.  
         [0064]     One could argue that the probability to identify a shared haplotype amongst five chromosomes by chance alone is high and does not support the location of the QTL within this region. To more quantitatively estimate the significance of the haplotype sharing amongst “Q” chromosomes, accounting for the distance between adjacent markers, as well as allelic frequencies, a multipoint LD analysis was performed using the DISMULT program (T ERWILLIGER  1995). To test the significance of the haplotype sharing observed amongst the five “Q” chromosomes, the same DISMULT analysis was performed on all 462 possible combinations of the 11 chromosomes taken five at a time. For each of these analyses, the highest likelihood obtained anywhere along the analyzed chromosome segment was stored. The likelihood obtained using the real five “Q” chromosomes at the position of marker PULGE3 was the highest one obtained across all chromosome permutations (data not shown), clearly indicating that the observed haplotype sharing is very unlikely to be fortuitous.  
         [0065]     When we previously demonstrated that only the paternal SSC2 QTL allele influenced muscle mass and that the most likely QTL position coincided with IGF2, this gene obviously stood out as the prime candidate (N EZER  et al. 1999; J EON  et al. 1999). On the basis of the initial linkage analysis, however, the confidence interval for the QTL covered approximately 4cM, which were bound to contain a multitude of genes other than IGF2. It was, therefore, useful to corroborate these papers by refining the map position of the QTL by exploiting both LD- and marker-assisted segregation analysis. Because of the observed parent-of-origin effect, analysis was focused on a chromosome region that is the ortholog of the human 11p15 imprinted domain. Strong evidence is provided herein that the QTL indeed maps to the p57-H19 imprinted gene cluster and within this region, to a chromosome segment of ≈90 Kb known to contain the TH, INS and IGF2 genes. These findings, therefore, considerably strengthen the candidacy of IGF2 and justify a detailed analysis of this gene.  
         [0066]     Success in refining the map position of this QTL down to the subcentimorgan level supports its simple molecular architecture. Together with recent successes in positional cloning and identification of the mutations that underlie QTL (e.g. G ROBET  et al. 1997; M ILAN  et al. 2001; G RISART  et al. 2002; B LOTT  et al. 2002), this clearly indicates that at least part of the genetic variation of production traits in livestock is due to single mutations with large effects on the traits of interest.  
         [0067]     The success of haplotype-sharing approaches in fine-mapping QTL in livestock also suggests that QTL may be mapped in these populations by virtue of the haplotype signature resulting from intense selection on “Q” alleles, i.e., haplotypes of unusual length given their population frequency. The feasibility of this approach has recently been examined in human populations for loci involved in resistance to malaria (S ABETI  et al. 2002). QTL could thus be identified in livestock in the absence of phenotypic data.  
       EXAMPLE 2  
       [0068]     Positional identification of a regulatory mutation in IGF2 causing a major QTL effect on muscle development in the pig.  
         [0069]     The identification of causative mutations for Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) is a major hurdle in genetic studies of multifactorial traits and disorders. Here, it is shown that a paternally expressed QTL-affecting muscle mass and fat deposition in pigs is caused by a single nucleotide substitution in intron 3 of IGF2. The mutation occurs in an evolutionary conserved CpG island that is hypomethylated in skeletal muscle. Pigs carrying the mutation have a three-fold increase in IGF2 mRNA expression in postnatal muscle. The mutation abrogates in vitro interaction with a nuclear factor, most likely a repressor. The mutation has experienced a selective sweep in several pig breeds. The study provides an outstanding example where the causal relationship between a regulatory mutation and a QTL effect has been established.  
         [0070]     The imprinted IGF2-linked QTL is one of the major porcine QTLs for body composition. It was first identified in intercrosses between the European Wild Boar and Large White domestic pigs and between Pietrain and Large White pigs (1, 2). The data showed that alleles from the Large White and Pietrain breeds, respectively, were associated with increased muscle mass and reduced back-fat thickness, consistent with the existing breed differences in the two crosses. A paternally expressed IGF2-linked QTL was subsequently documented in intercrosses between Chinese Meishan and Large White/Landrace pigs (3) and between Berkshire and Large White pigs (4). In both cases the allele for high muscle mass was inherited from the lean Large White/Landrace breed.  
         [0071]     Recently, a haplotype-sharing approach to refine the map position of the QTL was used (5). It was assumed that a new allele (O) promoting muscle development occurred g generations ago on a chromosome carrying the wild-type allele (q). It was also assumed that the favorable allele had gone through a selective sweep due to the strong selection for lean growth in commercial pig populations. Twenty-eight chromosomes with known QTL status were identified by marker-assisted segregation analysis using cross-bred Piétrain and Large White boars. All 19 Q-bearing chromosomes shared a haplotype in the 90 kilobase pairs (kb) interval between the microsatellites PULGE1 and SWC9 (IGF2 3′-UTR), which was not present among the q chromosomes and was, therefore, predicted to contain the QTL. In contrast, the nine q chromosomes exhibited six distinct marker haplotypes in the same interval. This region is part of the CDKN1C-H19 imprinted domain and contains INS and IGF2 as the only known paternally expressed genes. Given the known functions of these genes and especially the role of IGF2 in myogenesis (6), they stood out as prime positional candidates. A comparative sequence analysis of the porcine INS-IGF2 region revealed as many as 59 conserved elements (outside known exons) between pig and human, all being candidate regions for harboring the causative mutation (7).  
         [0072]     In order to identify the causative mutation, one of the 19 Q-chromosomes (P208) and six q-chromosomes (each corresponding to one of the six distinct marker haplotypes) were re-sequenced for a 28.6 kb segment containing IGF2, INS, and the 3′ end of TH. This chromosome collection was expanded by including Q- and q-chromosomes from (i) a Wild Boar/Large White intercross segregating for the QTL (2), (ii) a Swedish Landrace boar showing no evidence for QTL segregation in a previous study (8), (iii) F 1  sires from a Hampshire/Landrace cross showing no indication for QTL segregation (9), and (iv) an F 1  sire from a Meishan/Large White intercross. A Japanese Wild Boar was included as a reference for the phylogenetic analysis; the QTL status of this animal is unknown, but it is assumed that it is homozygous wild-type (q/q). A total of 258 DNA sequence polymorphisms were identified corresponding to a staggering one polymorphic nucleotide per 111 base pairs (bp) ( FIG. 4A ). The sequences formed three major and quite divergent clusters ( FIG. 4B ). The only exception to this pattern was one Hampshire haplotype (H254) that was apparently recombinant.  
         [0073]     The two established Q haplotypes from Piétrain and Large White animals (P208 and LW3) were identical to each other and to the chromosomes from the Landrace (LRJ) and Hampshire/Landrace (H205) animals for almost the entire region, showing that the latter two must be of Q-type as well. The absence of QTL segregation in the offspring of the F 1  Hampshire×Landrace boar carrying the H205 and H254 chromosomes implies that the latter recombinant chromosome is also of Q-type. This places the causative mutation downstream from IGF2 intron 1, the region for which H254 is identical to the other Q chromosomes. The Large White chromosome (LW197) from the Meishan/Large White pedigree clearly clustered with q chromosomes, implying that the F 1  sire used for sequencing was homozygous q/q as a previous QTL study showed that the Meishan pigs carried an IGF2 allele associated with low muscle mass (3). Surprisingly, the Meishan allele (M220) was nearly identical to the Q chromosomes but with one notable exception, it shared a G nucleotide with all q chromosomes at a position (IGF2-intron3-nt3072) where all Q chromosomes have an A nucleotide ( FIG. 4A ). Under a bi-allelic QTL model, the causative mutation would correspond to a DNA polymorphism for which the two alleles segregate perfectly between Q- and q-chromosomes. The G to A transition at IGF2-intron3-nt3072 is the only polymorphism fulfilling this criterion, implying that it is the causative Quantitative Trait Nucleotide (QTN) (10). So far, 12 large sire families were tested where the sire is heterozygous A/G at this position and all have showed evidence for QTL segregation. In contrast, more than 40 sires were tested, representing several different breeds, genotyped as homozygous A/A or G/G at this position without obtaining any significant evidence for the segregation of a paternally expressed QTL at the IGF2 locus. The results provide conclusive genetic evidence that IGF2-intron3-nt3072G→A is the causative mutation.  
         [0074]     IGF2-intron3-nt3072 is part of an evolutionary conserved CpG island of unknown function (7), located between Differentially Methylated Region 1 (DMR1) and a matrix attachment region previously defined in mice (11-13). The 94 bp sequence around the mutation shows about 85% sequence identity to both human and mouse, and the wild-type nucleotide at IGF2-intron3-nt3072 is conserved among the three species ( FIG. 4A ). The QTN occurs three bp downstream of an eight bp palindrome also conserved between the three species. The methylation status of the 300 bp fragment centered on IGF2-intron3-nt3072 and containing 50 CpG dinucleotides was examined by bisulphite sequencing in four-month-old Q pat /q mat  and q pat /Q mat  animals. In skeletal muscle, paternal and maternal chromosomes were shown to be essentially unmethylated (including the IGF2-intron3-nt3071 C residue), irrespective of the QTL genotype of the individual (3.4% of CpGs methylated on average;  FIG. 5A ). The CpG island was more heavily, and also differentially, methylated in liver. 33% of the CpGs were methylated on the maternal alleles versus 19% on the paternal allele. Unexpectedly, therefore, this CpG island behaves as a previously unidentified DMR in liver, the repressed maternal allele being more heavily methylated than the paternal allele, which is the opposite of what is documented for the adjacent DMR1 in the mouse.  
         [0075]     To uncover a possible function for this element, electrophoretic mobility shift analyses (EMSA) were performed using oligonucleotide probes spanning the QTN and corresponding to the wild-type (q) and mutant (O) sequences. Nuclear extracts from murine C2C12 myoblast cells, human HEK293 cells, and human HepG2 cells were incubated with radioactively labeled q or Q oligonucleotides. One specific band shift (complex C1 in  FIG. 5B ) was obtained with the wild-type (q) but not the mutant (O) probe using extracts from C2C12 myoblasts; similar results were obtained using both methylated and unmethylated probes. A band shift with approximately the same migration, but weaker, was also detected in extracts from HEK293 and HepG2 cells. The specificity of the complex was confirmed since competition was obtained with ten-fold molar excess of unlabeled q probe, whereas a 50-fold excess of unlabeled Q probe did not achieve competition ( FIG. 5B ). Thus, the wild-type sequence binds a nuclear factor and this interaction is abrogated by the mutation.  
         [0076]     To further characterize the functional significance of the IGF2 Q mutation, its effect on transcription was studied by employing a transient transfection assay in mouse C2C12 myoblasts. Q and q constructs were made containing a 578 bp fragment from the actual region inserted in front of a Luciferase reporter gene driven by the herpes thymidine kinase (TK) minimal promoter. The two constructs differed only by the IGF2-intron3-nt3072G→A transition. The ability of the IGF2 fragments to activate transcription from the heterologous promoter was compared with the activity of the TK-promoter alone. The presence of the q-construct caused a two-fold increase of transcription, whereas the Q-construct caused a significantly higher, seven-fold, increase ( FIG. 5C ). Interpreting this result, in the light of the results from the EMSA experiment, the Q mutation abrogates the interaction with a repressor protein that modulates the activity of a putative IGF2 enhancer present in this CpG island. This view is consistent with in silico identification of potential binding sites for both activators and repressors in this intronic DNA fragment (14).  
         [0077]     The in vivo effect of the mutation on IGF2 expression was studied in a purpose-built Q/q×Q/q intercross counting 73 offspring. As a deletion encompassing DMR0, DMR1, and the associated CpG island derepresses the maternal IGF2 allele in mesodermal tissues in the mouse (12), the effect of the intron3-nt3072 mutation on IGF2 imprinting in the pig was tested. This was achieved by monitoring transcription from the paternal and maternal IGF2 alleles in tissues of q/q, Q pat /q mat , and q pat /Q mat  animals that were heterozygous for the SWC9 microsatellite located in the IGF2 3′UTR. Imprinting could not be studied in Q/Q animals that were all homozygous for SWC9. Before birth, IGF2 was shown to be expressed exclusively from the paternal allele in skeletal muscle and kidney, irrespective of the QTL genotype of the fetuses. At four months of age, weak expression from the maternal allele was observed in skeletal muscle, however, at comparable rates for all three QTL genotypes ( FIG. 6A ). Only the paternal allele could be detected in four-month-old kidney (data not shown). Consequently, the mutation does not seem to affect the imprinting status of IGF2. The partial derepression of the maternal allele in skeletal muscle of all QTL genotypes may, however, explain why in a previous study, muscular development was found to be slightly superior in q pat /Q mat  versus q/q animals and in Q/Q versus Q pat /q mat  animals (2).  
         [0078]     The Q allele was expected to be associated with an increased IGF2 expression since IGF2 stimulates myogenesis (6). To test this, the relative mRNA expression of IGF2 was monitored at different ages in the Q/q×Q/q intercross, using both Northern blot analysis and real-time PCR ( FIGS. 6B and 6C ). The expression levels in fetal muscle and postnatal liver was about ten-fold higher than in postnatal muscle. No significant difference was observed in fetal samples or in postnatal liver samples, but a significant three-fold increase of postnatal IGF2 mRNA expression in skeletal muscle was observed in (Q/Q or Q pat /q mat ) versus (q pat /Q mat  or q/q) progeny. The significant difference in IGF2 expression revealed by real-time PCR was confirmed using two different internal controls, GAPDH ( FIG. 6C ) and HPRT (15). An increase of all detected transcripts originating from the three promoters (P2-P4) located downstream of the mutated site was found. Combined, these results provide strong support for IGF2 being the causative gene. The lack of significant differences in IGF2 mRNA expression in fetal muscle and postnatal liver are consistent with the previous QTL study, showing no effect of the IGF2 locus on birth weight and weight of liver (2).  
         [0079]     There has been a strong selection for lean growth (high muscle mass and low fat content) in commercial pig populations in Europe and North America during the last 50 years. Therefore, how this selection pressure has affected the allele frequency distribution of the IGF2 QTL was investigated. The causative mutation was absent in a small sample of European and Asian Wild Boars and in several breeds that have not been strongly selected for lean growth (Table 1). In contrast, the causative mutation was found at high frequencies in breeds that have been subjected to strong selection for lean growth. The only exceptions were the experimental Large White population at the Roslin Institute that was founded from commercial breeding stocks in the UK around 1980 (16), as well as the experimental Large White populations used for the Pietrain/Large White intercross (1). These two populations thus reflect the status in some commercial populations about 20 years ago and it is possible that the IGF2*Q allele is even more predominant in contemporary populations. The results demonstrate that IGF2*Q has experienced a selective sweep in several major commercial pig populations and it has apparently been spread between breeds by cross-breeding.  
         [0080]     The results have important practical implications. The IGF2*Q mutation increases the amount of meat produced, at the expense of fat, by 3-4 kg for an animal slaughtered at the usual weight of about 100 kg. The high frequency of IGF2*Q among major pig breeds implies that this mutation affects the productivity of many millions of pigs in the Western world. The development of a simple diagnostic DNA test now facilitates the introgression of this mutation to additional breeds. This could be an attractive way to improve productivity in local breeds as a measure to maintain biological diversity. The diagnostic test will also make it possible to investigate whether the IGF2*Q mutation is associated with any unfavorable effects on meat quality or any other trait. It has been previously demonstrated that European and Asian pigs were domesticated from different subspecies of the Wild Boar and that Asian germplasm has been introgressed into European pig breeds (17). The IGF2*Q mutation apparently occurred on an Asian chromosome as it showed a very close relationship to the haplotype carried by Chinese Meishan pigs. This explains the large genetic distance observed between Q- and q-haplotypes ( FIG. 4 ). However, it is an open question as to whether the Q mutation occurred before or after the Asian chromosome was introduced into European pigs.  
         [0081]     This study provides new insights in IGF2 biology. The role of IGF2 on prenatal development is well documented (18, 19). It has been observed that the Q mutation does not upregulate IGF2 expression in fetal tissue but after birth, demonstrates that IGF2 has an important role for regulating postnatal myogenesis. The finding that the sequence around the mutation does not match any known DNA-binding site suggests that this sequence may bind an unknown nuclear factor (14). These results also mean that pharmacological intervention of the interaction between this DNA segment and the corresponding nuclear factor opens up new strategies for promoting muscle growth in human patients with muscle deficiencies or for stimulating muscle development at the cost of adipose tissue in obese patients.  
         [0000]     Materials and Methods  
         [0000]     DNA Sequencing  
         [0082]     Animals that were homozygous for 13 of the haplotypes of interest were identified using flanking microsatellite markers and pedigree information. A 28.6 kb chromosome segment containing the last exon of TH, INS, and IGF2 was amplified from genomic DNA in seven long-range PCR products using the Expand Long Template PCR system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). The same procedure was used to amplify the remaining M220 and LW197 haplotypes from two BAC clones isolated from a genomic library that was made from a Meishan/Large White F 1  individual (20). The long template PCR products were subsequently purified using Geneclean (Polylab) and sequenced using the Big Dye Terminator Sequencing or dGTP Big Dye Terminator kits (Perkin Elmer). The primers used for PCR amplification and sequencing are available as supplementary information. The sequence traces were assembled and analyzed for DNA sequence polymorphism using the Polyphred/Phrap/Consed suite of programs (21).  
         [0000]     SNP Analysis of IGF2-intron3-nt3072  
         [0083]     The genotype was determined by pyrosequencing with a Luc 96 instrument (Pyrosequencing AB). A 231 bp DNA fragment was PCR amplified using Hot Star Taq DNA polymerase and Q-Solution (QIAGEN) with the primers pyrol8274F (5′-Biotine-GGGCCGCGGCTTCGCCTAG-3′) (SEQ ID NO: 2) and pyro18274R (5′-CGCACGCTTCTCCTGCCACTG-3′ (SEQ ID NO:3)). The sequencing primer (pyro18274seq: 5′-CCCCACGCGCTCCCGCGCT-3′ SEQ ID NO:4)) was designed on the reverse strand because of a palindrome located 5′ to the QTN.  
         [0000]     Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Analyses (EMSA)  
         [0084]     DNA-binding proteins were extracted from C2C12, HEK293, and HepG2 cells as described (22). Gel shift assays were performed with 40 fmole  32 P-labeled ds-oligonucleotide, 10 μg nuclear extract, and 2 μg poly dI-dC in binding buffer (15 mM Hepes pH 7.65, 30.1 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl 2 , 2 mM spermidine, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.63 mM DTT, 0.06% NP-40, 7.5% glycerol). For competition assays, a 10-fold, 20-fold, 50-fold, and 100-fold molar excess of cold ds-oligonucleotide were added. Reactions were incubated for 20 minutes on ice before  32 P-labeled ds-oligonucleotide was added. Binding was then allowed to proceed for 30 minutes at room temperature. DNA-protein complexes were resolved on a 5% native polyacrylamide gel run in TBE 0.5× at room temperature for two hours at 150 V and visualized by autoradiography. The following two oligonucleotides were used: Q/q: 5′-GATCCTTCGCCTAGGCTC(A/G)CAGCGCGGGAGCGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:6 and SEQ ID NO:5).  
         [0000]     Northern Blot Analysis and Real-Time RT-PCR  
         [0085]     Total RNA was prepared from porcine muscle (gluteus) and liver tissues using Trizol (Invitrogen) and treated with DNase I (Ambion). The products from the first-strand cDNA synthesis (Amersham Biosciences) were column purified with QIAquick columns (Qiagen). Poly (A) +  RNA was purified from total RNA using the Oligotex mRNA kit (Qiagen). Approximately 75 ng poly(A) +  mRNA from each sample was separated by electrophoresis in a MOPS/formaldehyde agarose gel and transferred o/n to a Hybond-N+nylon membrane (Amersham Biosciences). The membrane was hybridized with pig-specific IGF2 and GAPDH cDNA probes using ExpressHyb hybridization solution (Clontech). The quantification of the transcripts was performed with a Phosphor Imager 425 (Molecular Dynamics). Real-time PCR were performed with an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). TaqMan probes and primers were designed with the Primer Express software (version 1.5); primer and probe sequences are available as supplementary material. PCR reactions were performed in triplicate using the Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). The mRNA was quantified as copy number using a standard curve. For each amplicon, a ten-point calibration curve was established by a dilution series of the cloned PCR product.  
         [0000]     Bisulphite-Based Methylation Analysis.  
         [0086]     Bisulphite sequencing was performed according to Engemann et al. (23). Briefly, high molecular weight genomic DNA was isolated from tissue samples using standard procedures based on proteinase K digestion, phenol-chloroform extraction, and ethanol precipitation. The DNA was digested with EcoRI, denatured, and embedded in low melting point agarose beads. Non-methylated cytosine residues were converted to uracil using a standard bisulphite reaction.  
         [0087]     The region of interest was amplified using a two-step PCR reaction with primers complementary to the bisulphite-converted DNA sequence (PCR1-UP: 5′-TTGAGTGGGGATTGTTGAAGTTTT-3′ (SEQ ID NO:7), PCR1-DN: 5′-ACCCACTTATAATCTAAAAAAATAATAAATATATCTAA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:8), PCR2-UP: 5′-GGGGATTGTTGAAGTTTT-3′ (SEQ ID NO:9), PCR2-DN: 5′-CTTCTCCTACCACTAAAAA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:10)). The amplified strand was chosen in order to be able to differentiate the Q and q alleles. The resulting PCR products were cloned in the pCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen). Plasmid DNA was purified using the modified Plasmid Mini Kit (QIAGEN) and sequenced using the Big Dye Terminator Kit (Perkin Elmer) and an ABI3100 sequence analyzer.  
         [0000]     Transient transfection assay  
         [0088]     C2C12 myoblast cells were plated in six-well plates and grown to ˜80% confluence. Cells were transiently co-transfected with a Firefly luciferase reporter construct (4 μg) and a  Renilla luciferase  control vector (phRG-TK, Promega; 80 ng) using 10 μg Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). The cells were incubated for 24 hours before lysis in 100 μl Triton Lysis Solution. Luciferase activities were measured with a Mediators PhL luminometer (Diagnostic Systems) using the Dual-Luciferase reporter Assay System (Promega).  
         [0000]     Analysis of the IGF2 Imprinting Status  
         [0089]     RT-PCR analysis of the highly polymorphic SWC9 microsatellite (located in IGF2 3′UTR) was used to determine the IGF2 imprinting status. The analysis involved progeny groups from heterozygous sires. Total RNA was extracted from the gluteus muscle using Trizol Reagent (Life Technology) and treated with RNase-free DNase I (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). cDNA was synthesized using the 1 st  Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH). The SWC9 marker was amplified using the primers UP (5′-AAGCACCTGTACCCACACG-3′ (SEQ ID NO:11)) and DN (5′-GGCTCAGGGATCCCACAG-3′ (SEQ ID NO:12)). The  32 P-labeled RT-PCR products were separated by denaturing PAGE and revealed by autoradiography.  
       EXAMPLE 3  
     The Mutation has an Effect on Teat Number  
       [0090]     Sires of two commercial lines were genotyped for the mutation. Shortly after birth, the number of teats was counted in all piglets. Piglet counts ranged from 12 to 18 teats and included 4477 individuals from 22 sires. A statistical analysis of teat number in piglets was performed by accounting for the following effects: 1) genetic line (lines A and B), 2) genotype of the sire for the mutation (QQ, Qq or qq) and 3) sex of the piglet (male/female). Analysis of variance was performed using Proc Mixed (SAS), assuming normality of dependent variable teat number. Estimates of some contrasts are given in Table 4.  
         [0091]     The effect of genotype on teat number in piglets is −0.28 teats. This effect is opposite to the one described by Hirooka et al. 2001. An effect of genetic line could not be demonstrated. The sex of the piglet had a significant effect on teat number with female pigs having an average of 0.05 teat more than males. Mean values per genotype and per line are given in Table 5.  
                                                           TABLE 4                           Analysis of variance of teat number counted in piglets       of two commercial lines (n = 4477).                Effect   P-value   Contrast   Estimate(s.e)                            Genotype of sire   &lt;0.001   QQ-qq   −0.28 (0.05)                   Qq-qq   −0.22 (0.03)           Genetic line   0.081           Sex   0.043   M-F   −0.05 (0.03)                      
 
         [0092]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 5 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Descriptive statistics of teat number counted in piglets of 
               
               
                 two commercial lines (n = 4477) descending from sires 
               
               
                 of three different genotypes with respect to the mutation. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Average 
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 N 
                 N descending 
                 teat 
               
               
                   
                 Genotype 
                 sires 
                 piglets 
                 number 
                 Stdev 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 A 
                 QQ 
                 2 
                 144 
                 14.51 
                 0.76 
               
               
                   
                 Qq 
                 5 
                 1720 
                 14.53 
                 0.82 
               
               
                   
                 qq 
                 3 
                 735 
                 14.74 
                 0.86 
               
               
                 B 
                 QQ 
                 2 
                 277 
                 14.41 
                 1.00 
               
               
                   
                 Qq 
                 7 
                 1054 
                 14.48 
                 0.81 
               
               
                   
                 qq 
                 3 
                 547 
                 14.73 
                 0.93 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0093]     The statistical analysis confirms that the mutation influences teat number. The Q allele that is favorable with respect to muscle mass and reduced back fat is the unfavorable allele for teat number. This strengthens the possibility of using the paternal imprinting character of this QTL in breeding programs. Selecting maternal lines for the q allele will enhance teat number, a characteristic that is favorable for the maternal side. On the other hand, paternal lines can be selected for the Q allele that will increase muscle mass and reduce back fat, characteristics that are of more importance in the paternal lines. Terminal sires that are homozygous QQ will pass the full effect of increased muscle mass and reduced back fat to the slaughter pigs, while selection of parental sows that express the q allele will have more teats without affecting slaughter quality.  
         [0094]     H IROOKA  H., D. J. D E  K ONING , B. H ARLIZIUS , J. A. M. V AN  A RENDONK , A. P. R ATTINK , M. A. M. G ROENEN , P. B PASCAMP , and H. B OVENHUIS,  2001. A whole-genome scan for quantitative trait loci affecting teat number in pigs.  J Anim. Sci.  79:2320-2326.  
       REFERENCES WITH EXAMPLE 1  
       [0000]    
       
          A MARGER , V., M. N GUYEN , A. S. V AN  L AERE , C. N EZER , M. G EORGES , and L. A NDERSSON,  2002. Comparative sequence analysis of the INS-IGF2-H19 gene cluster in pigs.  Mammalian Genome  13:388-398.  
          A NDERSSON , L. 2001. Genetic dissection of phenotypic diversity in farm animals.  Nature Reviews Genetics  2:130-138.  
          A RDLIE , K. G., L. K RUGLYAK , and M. S EIELSTAD,  2002. Patterns of linkage disequilibrium in the human genome.  Nat. Rev. Genet.  3:299-309.  
          B LOTT , S., J.-J. K IM , S. M OSIO , A. S CHMIDT -K ÜNTZEL , A. C ORNET , P. B ERZI , N. C AMBISANO , C. F ORD , B. G RISART , D. J OHNSON , L. K ARIM , P. S IMON , R. S NELL , R. S PELMAN , J. W ONG , J. V ILKKI , M. G EORGES , F. F ARNIR , and W. C OPPIETERS  (2002). Molecular dissection of a QTL: a phenylalanine to tyrosine substitution in the transmembrane domain of the bovine growth hormone receptor is associated with a major effect on milk yield and composition.  Genetics , in the press.  
          D ARVASI , A. 1998. Experimental strategies for the genetic dissection of complex traits in animal models.  Nat. Genet.  18:19-24.  
          D UNNER , S., C. C HARLIER , F. F ARNIR , B. B ROUWERS , J. C ANON , and M. G EORGES,  1997. Towards interbreed IBD fine mapping of the mh locus: double-muscling in the  Asturiana de los Valles  breed involves the same locus as in the Belgian Blue cattle breed.  Mammalian Genome  8:430-435.  
          F AHRENKRUG , S. C., G. A. R OHRER , B. A. F REKING , T. P. S MITH , K. O SOEGAWA , C. L. S HU , J. J. C ATANESE , and P. J.  DE  J ONG,  2001. A porcine BAC library with tenfold genome coverage: a resource for physical and genetic map integration.  Mamm. Genome  12:472-474.  
          F LINT , J. and R. M OTT,  2001. Finding the molecular basis of quantitative traits: successes and pitfalls.  Nature Reviews Genetics  2:437-445.  
          F LORINI , J. R., D. Z. E WTON  and S. A. C OOLICAN,  1996. Growth hormone and the insulin-like growth factor system in myogenesis.  Endocr. Rev.  17:481-517.  
          G EORGES , M., D. N IELSEN , M. M ACKINNON , A. M ISHRA , R. O KIMOTO , A. T. P ASQUINO , L. S. S ARGEANT , A. S ORENSEN , M. R. S TEELE , X. Z HAO , J. E. W OMACK  and I. H OESCHELE,  1995. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production by exploiting progeny testing.  Genetics  139:907-920.  
          G RISART , B., W. C OPPIETERS , F. F ARNIR , L. K ARIM , C. F ORD , N. C AMBISANO , M. M NI , S. R EID , R. S PELMAN , M. G EORGES  and R. S NELL,  2002. Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: Identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT gene with major effect on milk yield and composition.  Genome Research  12:222-231.  
          G ROBET , L., L. J. R OYO  M ARTIN , D. P ONCELET , D. P IROTTIN , B. B ROUWERS , J. R IQUET , A. S CHOEBERLEIN , S. D UNNER , F. M ENISSIER , J. M ASSABANDA , R. F RIES , R. H ANSET , and M. G EORGES,  1997. A deletion in the myostatin gene causes double-muscling in cattle.  Nature Genetics  17:71-74.  
          H ANSET , R., C. D ASNOIS , S. S CALAIS , C. M ICHAUX , and L. G ROBET,  1995. Effets de l&#39;introgression dans le génome Piétrain de l&#39;allèle normal au locus de sensibilité à l&#39;halothane,  Genet. Sel. Evol.  27:77-88.  
          J EON , J. T., O. C ARLBORG , A. T ÖRNSTEN , E. G IUFFRA , V. A MARGER , P. C HARDON , L. A NDERSSON -E KLUND , K. A NDERSSON , I. H ANSSON , K. L UNDSTRÖM , and L. A NDERSSON,  1999. A paternally expressed QTL affecting skeletal and cardiac muscle mass in pigs maps to the IGF2 locus.  Nat. Genet.  21:157-158.  
          M ACKAY , T. F. C., 2001. Quantitative Trait Loci in  Drosophila. Nature Reviews Genetics  2:11-20.  
          M AURICIO , R., 2001. Mapping quantitative trait loci in plants: uses and caveats for evolutionary biology.  Nature Reviews Genetics  2:370-381.  
          M EUWISSEN , T. H., and M. E. G ODDARD,  2001. Prediction of identity by descent probabilities from marker-haplotypes.  Genet. Sel. Evol.  33:605-634.  
          M ILAN , D., J. T. J EON , C. L OOFT , V. A MARGER , A. R OBIC , M. T HELANDER , C. R OGEL -G AILLARD , S. P AUL , N. I ANNUCCELLI , L. R ASK , H. R ONNE , K. L UNDSTROM , N. R EINSCH , J. G ELLIN , E. K ALM , P. L. R OY , P. C HARDON , and L. A NDERSSON,  2000. A mutation in PRKAG3 associated with excess glycogen content in pig skeletal muscle.  Science  288:1248-1251.  
          N EZER , C., L. M OREAU , B. B ROUWERS , W. C OPPIETERS , J. D ETILLEUX , R. H ANSET , L. K ARIM , A. K VASZ , P. L EROY , M. G EORGES,  1999. An imprinted QTL with major effect on muscle mass and fat deposition maps to the IGF2 locus in pigs,  Nat. Genet.  21:155-156.  
          N EZER , C., L. M OREAU , D. W AGENAAR , and M. G EORGES,  2002. Results of a whole genome scan targeting QTL for growth and carcass characteristics in a Piétrain X Large White intercross.  Genetics, Selection, Evolution  34:371-387.  
          O NYANGO , P., W. M ILLER , J. L EHOCZKY , C. T. L EUNG , B. B IRREN , S. W HEELAN , K. D EWAR , and A. P. F EINBERG,  2000. Sequence and Comparative Analysis of the Mouse 1-Megabase Region Orthologous to the Human 11p15 Imprinted Domain.  Genome Res.  10:1697-1710.  
          R EIK , W., and J. W ALTER,  2001. Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome.  Nature Reviews Genetics  2:21-32.  
          R IQUET , J., W. C OPPIETERS , N. C AMBISANO , J.-J. A RRANZ , P. B ERZI , S. D AVIS , B. G RISART , F. F ARNIR , L. K ARIM, M. M   NI , P. S IMON , J. T AYLOR , P. V ANMANSHOVEN , D. W AGENAAR , J. E. W OMACK , and M. G EORGES,  1999. Identity-by-descent fine-mapping of QTL in outbred populations: application to milk production in dairy cattle.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, US,  96:9252-9257.  
          S ABETI , P. C., D. E. R EICH , J. M. H IGGINS , H. Z. L EVINE , D. J. R ICHTER , S. F. S CHAFFNER , S. B. G ABRIEL , J. V. P LATKO , N. J. P ATTERSON , G. J. M C D ONALD , H. C. A CKERMAN , S. J. C AMPBELL , D. A LTSHULER , R. C OOPER , D. K WIATKOWSKI , R. W ARD , and E. S. L ANDER,  2002. Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure.  Nature  419:832-837.  
          T ERWILLIGER , J. D., 1995 A powerful likelihood method for the analysis of linkage disequilibrium between trait loci and one or more polymorphic marker loci.  Am. J. Hum. Genet.  56:777-787.  
       
     
       REFERENCES AND NOTES WITH EXAMPLE 2  
       [0000]    
       
          1. C. Nezer et al.,  Nature Genet.  21, 155-156 (1999).  
          2. J.-T. Jeon et al.,  Nature Genet.  21, 157-158 (1999).  
          3. D. J. De Koning et al.,  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.  97, 7947-7950 (2000).  
          4. H. Thomsen, J. C. M. Dekkers, H. K. Lee, and M. Rothschild, paper presented at the 7th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France 2002.  
          5. C. Nezer et al., submitted (2003).  
          6. J. R. Florini, D. Z. Ewton, and F. J. Mcwade,  Diabetes Rev.  3, 73-92 (1995).  
          7. V. Amarger et al.,  Mammalian Genome  13, 388-398 (2002).  
          8. G. J. Evans et al.,  Genetics  in press (2003).  
          9. QTL genotyping of the Pietrain/Large White, Wild Boar/Large White, and Hampshire/Landrace crosses by marker-assisted segregation analysis was performed as described (5). Briefly, the likelihood of the pedigree data was computed under two hypothesis: H0, postulating that the corresponding boar was homozygous at the QTL (Q/Q or q/q), and H1, postulating that the boar was heterozygous at the QTL (Q/q). Likelihoods were computed using “% lean meat” as phenotype (as the effect of the QTL was shown to be most pronounced on this trait in previous analyses), and assuming a Q to q allele substitution effect of 3.0% (1). If the odds in favor of one of the hypotheses were superior or equal to 100:1, the most likely hypothesis was considered to be true. For the Hampshire/Landrace cross, 75 offspring from four boars with identical H254/H205 genotype were merged in a single analysis. The odds in favor of the H0 hypothesis was 103.6:1, indicating that these boars were either Q/Q or q/q.  
          10. T. F. C. Mackay,  Nature Rev. Genet.  2, 11-21 (2001).  
          11. J. M. Greally, M. E. Guinness, J. Mcgrath, and S. Zemel,  Mammalian Genome  8, 805-810 (1997).  
          12. M. Constancia et al.,  Nature Genet.  26, 203-206 (2000).  
          13. S. Eden et al.,  EMBO J.  20, 3518-3525 (2001).  
          14. The nucleotide sequence of the conserved footprint surrounding the QTN was analyzed in silico for potential binding sites using the following transcription factor binding site databases (TFSEARCH, http://www.cbrcjp/research/db/TFSEARCH.html; Tess, http://www.cbil.upenn.edu/tess/; Signal Scan, http://bimas.dcrt.nih.gov/molbio/signal (24); and alibaba2, http://www.gene-regulation.de/). The sequence immediately flanking the QTN did not show any convincing match with known binding sites. However, the entire 94 bp fragment is highly GC-rich and consequently, several potential binding sites for the Sp-(eight GC-boxes), ZF5 (one consensus binding site), EGR/WT1 (three GSG-elements), and AP2 (three AP-2-boxes) families of transcription factors were identified in sites flanking the QTN. Both activators and repressors are known to competitively or cooperatively interact with such GC-rich motifs. Thus, the high density of potential regulatory elements identified in this fragment is consistent with the obtained EMSA and transfection results.  
          15. Relative expression of IGF2/HPRT in skeletal muscle from three-week-old pigs was as follows: Q:260.2±70.8 and q:59.6±12.1 (P&lt;0.05, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, two sided).  
          16. G. A. Walling et al.,  Anim. Genet.  29, 415-424 (1998).  
          17. E. Giuffra et al.,  Genetics  154, 1785-1791 (2000).  
          18. T. M. Dechiara, A. Efstratiadis, and E. J. Robertson,  Nature  345, 78-80 (1990).  
          19. F. L. Sun, W. L. Dean, G. Kelsey, N.D. Allen, and W. Reik,  Nature  389, 809-815 (1997).  
          20. S. I. Anderson, N. L. Lopez-Corrales, B. Gorick, and A. L. Archibald,  Mammalian Genome  11, 811-814 (2000).  
          21. D. Nickerson, V. O. Tobe, and S. L. Taylor,  Nucleic Acids Res.  25, 2745-2751 (1997).  
          22. N. C. Andrews and D. V. Faller,  Nucleic Acids Res.  19, 2499 (1991).  
          23. S. Engemann, O. El-Maarri, P. Hajkova, J. Oswald, and J. Walter, in Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 181 : Genomic imprinting: Methods and Protocols  A. Ward, Ed. (Humana Press Inc., Totowa, N.J., 2002).  
          24. D. S. Prestridge,  Comput. Appl. Biosci.  7, 203-206 (1991).  
          25. C. Kashuk, S. Sengupta, E. Eichler, and A. Chakravarti,  Genome Res.  12, 333-338 (2002).  
       
     
         [0145]     26. S. Kumar, K. Tamura, I. B. Jakobsen, and M. Nei,  Bioinformatics  17, 1244-1245 (2001).  
                                                                                   TABLE 1                           Utilized sequence tagged sites (STS) and corresponding DNA sequence polymorphisms (DSP).            STS   Source   UP-primer (5′-3′)   DN-primer (5′-3′)   DSP 2     DSP (5′-3′)                    TSSC5   B1183986   TCATCCAGGGCCTGGTCAT   (SEQ ID NO:13)   TGTCTGAGGCCGACACGGCC   (SEQ ID NO:14)   T1   CCCCCTCCC(C/T)GGCCCCC   (SEQ ID NO:15)           (I1) 1         CG                                       T2   ACCCAGGGC(C/T)CCTTGAG   (SEQ ID NO:16)               SWR2516   gi7643973   GTGCATTATCGGGAGGTATG   (SEQ ID NO:17)   ACCCTGTATGATACTGTAACTCT   (SEQ ID NO:18)   SSR   ATAGGGTTA(GT)nAGATCAGTC   (SEQ ID NO:19)                       GG               KVLQT1   BAC956B11   CTTTGAGGTCCATCATGTTC   (SEQ ID NO:20)   GGACGTACATCCCATCGATGA   (SEQ ID NO:21)   SSR       (SSR)       CA               KVLQT1   BF198846   ATGGTTGTCCTCTGCGTGG   (SEQ ID NO:22)   TGGCGGTCGACGTGCAGCATC   (SEQ ID NO:23)   T1   TGGGTGGGGG(C/T)GCAGCCCC   (SEQ ID NO:24)       (I12)       GC                   TGGG                                       T2   GCTGGGA(C/T)CAGACC(G/A)TC   (SEQ ID NO:25)                                       T3   GCTGGGA(C/T)CAGACC(G/A)   (SEQ ID NO:25)                                           TCTGGG                                       T4   CTGTCTGCTCAT(C/T)CGGGGGCTG   (SEQ ID NO:26)                                       T5   GGCTGCGGGAGC(C/T)TGGGGCCAC   (SEQ ID NO:27)                                       T6   GCCACCCCCGCC(C/T)TGACCCTGA   (SEQ ID NO:28)               KVLQT1   BF198846   ATCCGCTTCCTCCAGATCC   (SEQ ID NO:29)   GCCGATGTACAGCGTGGTGA   (SEQ ID NO:30)   V1   TCTGGGCCGG(G/T)GTCCCCG   (SEQ ID NO:31)       (I11)       TG                                       T1   AAAAGGGTCC(A/G)GGAAGCT   (SEQ ID NO:32)                                       T2   TTGCAAACAGC(C/T)CCCAGAAGG   (SEQ ID NO:33)                                       T3   AGAAGGCGCAG(C/T)CTGCAGGGG   (SEQ ID NO:34)                                       T4   AGGGCGCTGG(C/T)TGCAGGGGTG   (SEQ ID NO:35)                                       T5   TTTATGAGTC(A/G)CAAAAACGAG   (SEQ ID NO:36)                                       T6   TGATGTCCGCC(C/T)(G/T)GGCA   (SEQ ID NO:37)                                           GACT                                       V2   TGATGTCCGCC(C/T)(G/T)GGCA   (SEQ ID NO:37)                                   GACT               KVLQT1   BF198846   GCCCCAAGCCCAAGAAGTC   (SEQ ID NO:38)   CCAGAATTGTCACAGCCATCC   (SEQ ID NO:39)   T   TCCGGGGCAT(A/G)TAGGACTGG   (SEQ ID NO:40)       (I7)       TG               389B2T7   BAC389B2   GGAGTACCTGCTGTGGCTTA   (SEQ ID NO:41)   CGTCCTATATCCATCAGGAATAT   (SEQ ID NO:42)   T1   AGTAGTAT(C/T)CATGAGCAC   (SEQ ID NO:43)               GTG       TG                                       T2   CCCAGGCCTC(G/A)ATCAGGTGGT   (SEQ ID NO:44)                                   TG                                       V   TATATGCCA(C/A)ACATGTGGCCCT   (SEQ ID NO:45)               CD81(I3)   F23061   GGGGCCATCCAGGAGTCAC   (SEQ ID NO:46)   CAAAGAGGATCACGAGGCAGG   (SEQ ID NO:47)               AG               INRA370SP6   BACINRA370   TGCGTAGCCATGGCGATGG   (SEQ ID NO:48)   AGTGTGGAACCCTGGGGGGGGAA   (SEQ ID NO:49)               GG       GG               370C17T7   BAC370C17   AGAGGGTACAGAAGCCCTG   (SEQ ID NO:50)   TTTGGTGTGGTGTCTGCTGACCC   (SEQ ID NO:51)               PULGE3   BACINRA370   AGGCTTTCTATCTGCAGGA   (SEQ ID NO:52)   ACCGTGTGGCCATCTGGGTG   (SEQ ID NO:53)   SSR   TCTCTGTAT(CA)n CGCACGCAC   (SEQ ID NO:54)               GG               PULGE1   BACINRA370   GCGTTGCAGTGGCTCTGGCG   (SEQ ID NO:55)   GACACGGCCGCATGAATGTGC   (SEQ ID NO:56)   SSR   ACCCCAACA(TA)n ATTATGGTA   (SEQ ID NO:57)               TH(I13A)   AY044828   GCCCGTCTACTTCGTGTCTG   (SEQ ID NO:58)   ATCTCTGCCTTCATCGCACCCCC   (SEQ ID NO:59)   V   AGGATCCAGCC(A/T) GCAGCCCCG   (SEQ ID NO:60)               AG                                       ID   TCACAACCCCC(C) TCCCACAGC   (SEQ ID NO:61                                       and                                       SEQ ID NO:62)                                       T   CTGCGGAGGGG(A/G)GACCTGCAG   (SEQ ID NO:63)               TH(I13B)   AY044828   GCTGCGGACCCCACCGTCAC   (SEQ ID NO:64)   AGACTTCACCCCTAAAAGCCTGG   (SEQ ID NO:65)   ID   GCCAGGT(CAAGGCCAGGT)CGAGG   (SEQ ID NO:66                                   CC   and                                       SEQ ID NO:67)               INS(5′)   AY044828   AGCAGGCTGCTGTGCTGGG   (SEQ ID NO:68)   AGCCCAGACCCAGCTGACGG   (SEQ ID NO:69)   T1   GGCGCTTATGG(G/A)GCCGGGAGC   (SEQ ID NO:70)                                       V   CAAGCCCGG(G/T)CGGTTTGGCCT   (SEQ ID NO:71)                                       T2   CTAATGACCTC(A/G)AGGCCCCCA   (SEQ ID NO:72)               INS(I1,   AY044828   TGATGACCCACGGAGATGAT   (SEQ ID NO:73)   GCAGTAGTTCTCCAGCTGGTAGA   (SEQ ID NO:74)   T1   GGGACCAGCTG(C/T)GTTCCCAGG   (SEQ ID NO:75)       E2,I2)       CC       GGGAA                                       V   GCCCTGCTGGC(C/G)CTCTGGGCG   (SEQ ID NO:76)                                       T2   CTCCCACGCCC(C/T)GGTCCCGCT   (SEQ ID NO:77)               INS(3′)   AY044828   GCTCTCGCCACATCGGCTGC   (SEQ ID NO:78)   GGCGCCCAGCTCTAGGCCCGGC   (SEQ ID NO:79)   T   GGGCTGGCTGC(G/A)GTCTGGGAG   (SEQ ID NO:80)               IGF2(E3)   AY044828   CCCCTGAACTTGAGGACGAG   (SEQ ID NO:81)   CGCTGTGGGCTGGGTGGGCTGCC   (SEQ ID NO:82)   T   GCTGCCCCCCA(A/G)CCTGAGCTG   (SEQ ID NO:83)               CAGCC               IGF2(E5)   AY044828   CTTGCCTCCAACTCCCTCCC   (SEQ ID NO:84)   AGTGAACGTGAAACGGGGGG   (SEQ ID NO:85)   SSR   CTCTC GCT GTC (CT)n CGCCCT   (SEQ ID NO:86)                                   CTT               IGF2(I8)   AY044828   TGCGCCACCCCCGCCAAGT   (SEQ ID NO:87)   GCTTCCAGGTGTCATAGCGGAAG   (SEQ ID NO:88)   V   AGCCGGCTCCT(G/C)GGCTTCAAG   (SEQ ID NO:89)               CC                                       T   AGAGGTTGTTG(C/T)TCTGGGACA   (SEQ ID NO:90)               SWC9   AY044828   AAGCACCTGTACCCACACG   (SEQ ID NO:11)   GGCTCAGGGATCCCACAG   (SEQ ID NO:12)   SSR   (CA)n               IG(IGF2-   AY044828   CAAGCCAGGTCCTGTCGAGG   (SEQ ID NO:91)   GGACCCTGGGGGCTGTGG   (SEQ ID NO:92)   T   CGGCCTGTGGC(A/G)GGGAAGCTG   (SEQ ID NO:93)       H19)               HI9(??)   AY044828   ACGGTCCCGGGTCAGCAGG   (SEQ ID NO:94)   CAGAGCAAGTGGGCACCCAG   (SEQ ID NO:95)   T1   CGCGGGTTTGG(C/T)CAGCGGCAG   (SEQ ID NO:96)                                       T2   CACAGAGGACA(C/T)GGCCGCTTC   (SEQ ID NO:97)                                       T3   TCCTGGGGGCC(C/T)GCGGCTCGT   (SEQ ID NO:98)               IG(H19-   AY044828   GAGCACAGCCAAAGAACGGC   (SEQ ID NO:99)   CTTCACCCACGGACATGGCCGC   (SEQ ID NO:100)   T   CACCCAGGCTG(C/T)GCCCTGCGT   (SEQ ID NO:101)       RL23       CG       mrp)A               IG(H19-   AY044828   CGGGGGCACTGGGGGTCC   (SEQ ID NO:102)   CCGAGACCCTCCTCAAGTCC   (SEQ ID NO:103)   T   GTTCGCCCTCC(A/G)CTCTCAGCA   (SEQ ID NO:104)       RL23       mrp)B               IG(H19-   AY044828   TGAGCTGCTGAGCCCACAGG   (SEQ ID NO:105)   CAAGGGAAAGGTGTGCCGACC   (SEQ ID NO:106)   T   GGCCGGGCGCT(C/T)CGCCTTCCC   (SEQ ID NO:107)       RL23       mrp)C               IG(H19-   AY044828   AGGCAGAGGGCAGAGAGGGG   (SEQ ID NO:108)   CTCCAGCCCCACACTCTGC   (SEQ ID NO:109)   T   GCGTCCAGCGC(C/T)GAATCAGGC   (SEQ ID NO:110)       RL23       mrp)D                   1 I = intron; E = exon.              2 DSP: type of DNA sequence polymorphism: T = transition, V = transversion, ID = insertion / deletion, SSR = simple sequence repeat.             
 
         [0146]    
       
         
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Definition of the multisite haplotypes corresponding to the 
                   
               
               
                 different markers shown in  FIGS. 2 and 3 . 
               
             
          
           
               
                 STS 
                 MH1 
                 MH2 
                 MH3 
                 MH4 
                 MH5 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 TSSC5 
                 T-T 
                   
                 C-C 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 (I1) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 KVLQT1 
                 C-C-C-G-C-C 
                 C-T-T-A-T-C 
                 T-C-C-A-T-T 
               
               
                 (I12) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 KVLQT1 
                 T-C-G-C-T-T-G-T 
                 G-T-A-T-C-C-A-T 
                 G-C-G-C-C-C-G-G 
               
               
                 (I11) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 389B2T7 
                 C-G-C 
                 T-A-A 
               
               
                 TH1 + 
                 T-C-G- 
                 (SEQ ID NO: 
                 A-(-)-A-(-) 
                 A-C-G- 
                 (SEQ ID NO: 
               
               
                 TH2 
                 (CAAGGCCAGGT) 
                 111) 
                   
                 (CAAGGCCAGGT) 
                 112) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 INS(5′) + 
                 G-G-A-C-C-C-G 
                 A-T-G-T-G-T-A 
                 G-G-G-T-G-C-G 
               
               
                 INS 
               
               
                 (I1,E2,I2) + 
               
               
                 INS(3′) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 IGF2(E3) + 
                 G-2-G-T 
                 A-2-C-C 
                 A-1-G-T 
                 A-2-G-T 
                 G-2-G-T 
               
               
                 IGF2(E5) + 
               
               
                 IGF2(I8) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 H19 
                 C-C-T 
                 C-C-C 
                 C-T-C 
                 T-T-C 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 IG 
                 C-A-T-T 
                 T-G-C-C 
               
               
                 (H19- 
               
               
                 RL23MRP) 
               
               
                 A,B,C,D 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0147]    
       
         
               
             
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
           
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
             
               
                   
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Distribution of genotypes at the Quantitative Trait Nucleotide 
               
               
                 IGF2-intron3-nt3072G→A among pig populations strongly selected 
               
               
                 (+) or not strongly selected (−) for lean growth. 
               
             
          
           
               
                   
                 Genotype 
               
             
          
           
               
                 Breed 
                 Lean 
                 G/G 
                 G/A 
                 A/A 
                 Total 
               
               
                   
               
             
          
           
               
                 European Wild Boar 
                 − 
                 5 
                 0 
                 0 
                 5 
               
               
                 European Wild Boar - Uppsala a   
                 − 
                 2 
                 0 
                 0 
                 2 
               
               
                 Japanese Wild Boar 
                 − 
                 5 
                 0 
                 0 
                 5 
               
               
                 Meishan - Roslin b   
                 − 
                 11 
                 0 
                 0 
                 11 
               
               
                 Large White - Uppsala a   
                 + 
                 0 
                 1 
                 7 
                 8 
               
               
                 Large White - Roslin b   
                 + 
                 6 
                 1 
                 0 
                 7 
               
               
                 Large White - Liège c   
                 + 
                 7 
                 0 
                 0 
                 7 
               
               
                 Swedish Large White d   
                 + 
                 0 
                 0 
                 5 
                 5 
               
               
                 Swedish Hampshire d   
                 + 
                 0 
                 0 
                 6 
                 6 
               
               
                 Swedish Landrace d   
                 + 
                 0 
                 0 
                 5 
                 5 
               
               
                 Piétrain - Liège c   
                 + 
                 0 
                 1 
                 6 
                 7 
               
               
                 Duroc 
                 + 
                 0 
                 0 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Total 
                   
                 45 
                 3 
                 30  
                 78 
               
               
                   
               
               
                     a Founder animals in a Wild Boar × Large White intercross (2).    
               
               
                     b Founder animals in a Large White × Meishan intercross (16).    
               
               
                     c Founder animals in a Piétrain × Large White intercross (1).    
               
               
                     d Breeding boars that have been tested for QTL segregation in a previous study (8). The lack of evidence for QTL segregation shows that they can all be considered homozygous at the IGF2 locus.    
               
             
          
         
       
     
         [0148]
The invention relates to methods to select animals, such as mammals, in particular, domestic animals such as breeding animals or animals destined for slaughter, for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties, in particular, related to muscle mass and/or fat deposition or, in the case of mammals, to teat number. The invention provides a method for selecting an animal for having desired genotypic or potential phenotypic properties comprising testing the animal, a parent of the animal or its progeny for the presence of a nucleic acid modification affecting the activity of an evolutionary conserved CpG island, located in intron 3 of an IGF2 gene and/or for the presence of a nucleic acid modification affecting binding of a nuclear factor to an IGF2 gene.