BACKGROUND 
     A femto device (e.g., an access point base station), hereinafter a “femto,” may be a miniaturized base station designed to serve a scaled down area. The scaled down area may be a home or a small business. A femto may incorporate a functionality similar to a base station, but with a modification allowing a self contained deployment. The femto may be connected to the Internet via cable, DSL, on-premise fiber optic link, or a similar IP backhaul technology. This connection is used to integrate the femto with a WAN wireless operator&#39;s core network. 
     A femto may serve a geographic area, known as a “femto cell,” over a single carrier or channel. A femto cell typically covers a smaller geographic area or subscriber constituency than a conventional macro cell (e.g., a base station cell area). For example, femtos typically provide radio coverage in geographical areas such as one or more buildings or homes, whereas conventional base stations provide radio coverage in larger areas such as an entire cities or towns. The function of a femto is similar to that of a Wireless LAN (Local Area Network), providing the operators a low cost solution for coverage extension and for offloading a mobile station from the cellular network. 
     A shortcoming of a conventional femto is that there is no communication between the femto and other network elements (e.g., a server) regarding the current capacity at the femto. Instead, a network element must attempt to contact the femto for each event. An event may be a call. For example, if the femto is operating at a maximum and/or full capacity, an incoming call may result in a call failure. Thereafter, the network element has to determine a call treatment for the failed call. The call treatment may be a loss of the call (e.g., redirecting an incoming call to a voice mail system) since capacity is not available at the femto. These call originations and/or failures may continue until resources are available at the femto. This redundant operation results in an inefficient utilization of network resources. 
     Another shortcoming of a conventional femto is that a there is also no communication between a mobile station and the femto regarding the current capacity at the femto. For example, when a mobile station attempts a call via a femto, the call may not go through if the femto is operating at maximum capacity. Furthermore, there is no mechanism to allow the same outgoing call to pass once resources are available at the femto. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     Example embodiments provide a method and/or network element capable of mitigating one or more effects of operating at full capacity. 
     According to an example embodiment, a network element may address load capacity by identifying that a first network element (e.g., a femto) is operating at a threshold capacity. If a communication from a second network element intended for the first network element is received, an operation is performed that informs the second network element of at least one of (i) that the first network element is operating at a threshold capacity and (ii) that the communication cannot be delivered to the first network element while the first network element is operating at a threshold capacity. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       The accompanying figures are included to provide a further understanding of example embodiments, and are incorporated in and constitute part of this specification. In the figures: 
         FIG. 1  illustrates a wireless network including a femto according to an example embodiment. 
         FIG. 2  illustrates a network architecture diagram according to an example embodiment. 
         FIG. 3  is a signal flow diagram illustrating a capacity limitation mitigation technique for an outgoing call according to an example embodiment 
         FIGS. 4A and 4B  are signal flow diagrams illustrating a capacity limitation mitigation technique for an outgoing call involving more than one femto, according to further example embodiments. 
         FIGS. 5A-5C  are signal flow diagrams illustrating a capacity limitation mitigation technique for an incoming call according to various example embodiments. 
         FIGS. 6A-6C  are signal flow diagrams illustrating a capacity limitation mitigation technique for call handovers from a macro cell to a femto cell according to various example embodiments. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS 
     In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific details are set forth such as particular architectures, interfaces, techniques, etc., in order to provide a thorough understanding of the example embodiments. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the disclosed subject matter may be practiced in other illustrative embodiments that depart from these specific details. In some instances, detailed descriptions of well-known devices and/or methods are omitted so as not to obscure the description with unnecessary detail. All principles, aspects, and embodiments, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents of the disclosed subject matter. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents as well as equivalents developed in the future. 
     The following description relates to a network based on one or more of CDMA (IS95, cdma2000 and various technology variations), UMTS, GSM, 802.11 and/or related technologies. However, it should be noted that the example embodiments shown and described herein are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting in any way. As such, various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art for application to communication systems or networks based on technologies other than the above, which may be in various stages of development and intended for future replacement of, or use with, the above networks or systems. 
     As used herein, the term “mobile station” may be synonymous to a mobile user, user equipment (UE), user, subscriber, wireless terminal and/or remote station and may describe a remote user of wireless resources in a wireless communication network. The term “base station” may be understood as a one or more base stations, access points, and/or any terminus of radio frequency communication. Although current network architectures may consider a distinction between mobile/user devices and access points/base stations, the example embodiments described hereafter may generally be applicable to architectures where that distinction is not so clear, such as ad hoc and/or mesh network architectures, for example. 
       FIG. 1  illustrates wireless network including a femto according to an example embodiment. In  FIG. 1 , a femto  106  is configured to provide service to a femto cell area  104   a . The femto  106  is installed inside a building. In some example embodiments, femto  106  may also be installed outdoors. 
     A base station  110  provides service to a macro cell area  102 . The macro cell area  102  is larger than and encompasses femto cell area  104   a . Also, the macro cell area  102  may encompass more than one femto cell area, such as femto cell areas  104   a  and  104   b.    
     A mobile station  108  may connect to a core network via: i) a macro cell communication link ø associated with base station  110 ; and/or ii) femto cell communication links α and β associated with the femto  106 . In the femto cell communication links α and β, the mobile station connects with the femto  106  via a first communication link α. The first communication link α is a wireless communication link. The femto  106 , in turn, connects to Internet Protocol Multimedia Subsystem (“IMS”)  112  via a second communication link β. The femto  106  may thereafter interact with the base station  110  via IMS  112 , as further explained in  FIG. 2 . The second communication link β may be a broadband communication link (e.g., cable or DSL modem). 
     The femto  106  may also serve more than one mobile station. Nevertheless, the femto  106  has a threshold amount of resources that may be allocated to any one mobile station. Therefore, the femto  106  may be caused to operate at a maximum capacity based on the amount of mobile stations receiving service. Also, the type of messages being sent may also cause the femto  106  to operate at its maximum capacity. For example, voice call sessions require more resources than simple text messages. 
       FIG. 2  illustrates a network architecture diagram according to an example embodiment. The network architecture diagram incorporates a macro network and a femto network. 
     Regarding the femto network, a mobile station  202  is configured to communicate with a femto access point  204 . The femto access point  204  may include a femto and/or a femto in communication with a base station. Inbound or outbound messages traverse a femto gateway  206 . The femto gateway  206  may be configured for establishing a tunnel between the femto  204  and an IMS  210 . Further, the femto gateway  206  may be configured for establishing an authentication, authorization, and accounting (“AAA”) protocol. 
     Through the IMS  210 , the femto access point  204  may communicate with a MAP-Femto Interworking Function (“MFIF”)  212 . The MFIF  212  may control and/or influence operation of the femto access point  204 . The MFIF  212  communicates with the femto  204  using a session initiation protocol (“SIP”). SIP is a signaling protocol that may be used for controlling multimedia communication sessions such as voice and video calls over Internet Protocol (IP). However, the MFIF  212  may communicate with the femto access point  204  using other types of protocols. The MFIF  212  may be part of a server. 
     The MFIF  212  is also configured to communicate with a Media Gateway Controller Function (“MGCF”), and/or Media Gateway (“MGW”). The MFIF  212  may communicate with the MGCF/MGW  208  using Mobile Application Part (“MAP”) protocol  222 . The MAP protocol  222  is an application protocol used to access various databases, registers, and/or network elements. 
     Regarding the macro network in  FIG. 2 , the mobile station  202  may also communicate with base station  220 . The base station communicates with a macro network base station controller (“BSC”)  218 . The BSC  218  communicates with a mobile switching controller (“MSC”)  216 . For the purpose of explanation, the network architecture described in  FIG. 2  can be part of the network architecture illustrated in  FIG. 1 , but not being limited to this Figure. For example base station  110  in  FIG. 1  may include Macro Cell  220  and Macro BSC  218  in  FIG. 2 . 
     The MSC  216  may be configured to communicate directly, using well-known protocols, with the MGCF/MGW  208 . The MSC  216  may also be configured to communicate with the MGCF/MGW  208  using the MAP protocol  222 . 
     The network elements in the femto network and the macro network may communicate with each other. For example, the MSC  216  may communicate with the MFIF  212  using the MAP protocol  222 . Also, the femto access point  204  may communicate with the MGCF/MGW  208  over the IMS  210  using SIP. 
     Once a session is initiated, the MGCF/MGW  208  may establish a high capacity communication with the mobile station  202  over the femto network and/or the macro network. The high capacity communication may be audio and/or video. The MGCF/MGW  208  may use real-time packet transport (RTP) protocol to communicate, with the mobile station  202 , audio and/or video originating from: i) another mobile station in the same or similar network (not shown); and/or ii) from a Public/Private Switched Telephone Network (“PSTN”)  214 . 
       FIG. 3  is a signal flow diagram illustrating a capacity limitation mitigation technique for an outgoing call according to an example embodiment. An outgoing call is a call originating from a mobile station that is currently receiving service from a femto. In this example embodiment, the femto manages itself. For the purpose of explanation, the method described in  FIG. 3  can be implemented in the network architectures illustrated in  FIGS. 1 and 2 , but not being limited to these Figures. Therefore, reference numerals are not used in  FIG. 3 . 
     At step S 300 , a femto determines that it is operating at a maximum capacity. The femto may make this determination based on the number of mobile stations it is currently serving and/or the type of messages being transmitter over the femto. The femto may independently notify the mobile station that it is operating at a maximum capacity and/or it may wait until the mobile station attempts an outgoing call. 
     At step S 302 , the femto receives an outgoing call from a mobile station. As a result of the current load on the femto, the call fails. However, in response the femto sends a message to the mobile station requesting a user&#39;s preferences. Along with the request, the femto may also send a message to the mobile station informing it that it is currently operating at a maximum capacity (e.g., an “I_AM_FULL” message). Thereafter, at step S 306 , the user may either input a preference and/or a mobile station may be pre-programmed to respond with a desired preference, or alternatively a predetermined preference. The user&#39;s preferences are stored at the femto. 
     The user&#39;s preferences may include, but are not limited to: (i) a user defined order of importance; and/or (ii) a user defined call label. Regarding (i), the user may be requested to prioritize a call according to importance, such that the femto stores information regarding each attempted communication in a queue according to the user defined order of importance. Regarding (ii), the user may be requested to establish a label for the call. 
     After a period of time, in step S 308 , the femto will have freed resources and, thereafter, it will notify the mobile station per the user preferences, per S 310 . The notification may indicate that that femto currently has the capacity to resume the outgoing call. This may be caused by a drop in the number of mobile stations being served, a release of resources previously allocated to high capacity communications, and/or availability of resources sufficient only to the outgoing call. The notification may be a message to the user (e.g., “Do you still want to talk to User B?”) Also, the notification may be based on the above discussed preferences. For example, regarding (i), the femto may send a notification to the mobile station about the freed resources and request the user to acknowledge whether the first queued call should be established. Regarding (ii), the femto may send a notification using the same user defined call label (e.g., “Do you still want to talk to User B about: the client account?”). 
     If the user replies with an acknowledgement (“ACK”) to establish the call, as shown in step S 312 , the femto will resume establishing the outgoing call per S 314 . The femto resumes the outgoing call with the IMS. 
       FIGS. 4A and 4B  are signal flow diagrams illustrating a capacity limitation mitigation technique for an outgoing call involving more than one femto, according to further example embodiments. For the purpose of explanation, the method described in  FIGS. 4A and 4B  can be implemented in the network architectures illustrated in  FIGS. 1 and 2 , but not being limited to these Figures. Therefore, reference numerals are not used in  FIGS. 4A and 4B . 
       FIG. 4A  is a signal flow diagram illustrating a capacity limitation mitigation technique for an outgoing call if a mobile station&#39;s call passes from a first femto (“F 1 ”) to a second femto (“F 2 ”) according to an example embodiment. In  FIG. 4A , a first femto cell corresponding to the F 1  may not overlap with a second femto cell corresponding to the F 2 . In this example embodiment, the femtos are managed by the MFIF. Generally, the MFIF may operate in a similar manner as the femto in  FIG. 3 . 
     In step S 400 , the F 1  determines that it is operating at a maximum capacity, such that an outgoing call from a mobile station fails once it is received at the F 1  operating at maximum capacity. 
     In response to the failed call, in step S 402  the F 1  sends a message to the MFIF notifying it of the failed call. Communications between F 1  and the MFIF first have to travel through the IMS. Upon receiving the notification, in step S 404  the MFIF may instruct the F 1  to request user preferences. Once the F 1  receives such instructions, it sends a request for user preferences to the mobile station. The preferences may be the same as those discussed in relation to  FIG. 3 . 
     In step S 406 , the preferences are communicated from the mobile station to the F 1 , and thereafter forwarded to the MFIF. The preferences are then stored by the MFIF in step S 408 . 
     The MFIF managed femtos permit a mobile station to travel to different femtos and preserve a user&#39;s preferences. For example, in step S 410 , the mobile station leaves the femto cell of the F 1  and enters the femto cell of F 2 . In step  412 , the mobile station notifies the F 2  that the mobile station currently in its femto cell in order for the F 2  to provide wireless service. This notification may also include configuration communications between the F 2  and the mobile station. Unlike the F 1 , the F 2  is not operating at maximum capacity. Also, since the F 2  may also be managed by the MFIF, it also forwards the notification to the MFIF. 
     Since the MFIF previously stored the user preferences associated with the mobile station, in step S 414  the MFIF will send an ACK that the F 2  is now servicing the mobile station and will also forward the outgoing call information to the F 2 . Once the F 2  receives the user preferences, the F 2  may notify the mobile station per the stored user preferences (not shown). Alternatively, the F 2  may just resume the outgoing call without any further preliminary interaction with mobile station, as shown in step S 416 . 
       FIG. 4B  is a signal flow diagram illustrating a capacity limitation mitigation technique for an outgoing call if the F 1  and the F 2  have overlapping femto cells, according to another example embodiment. Since the first femto cell corresponding to the F 1  overlaps with the second femto cell corresponding to the F 2 , the mobile station may be redirected from the F 1  to the F 2  if the F 1  is operating at the maximum capacity. The F 1  and the F 2  may belong to the same or a different carrier. The signal flow diagram illustrated in  FIG. 4B  may also be adjusted for an incoming call intended for the mobile station. 
     In  FIG. 4B , after the F 1  notifies the MFIF that the F 1  is operating at capacity and that an outgoing call has failed (steps S 400  and S 402 ), the MFIF may send a redirection message to the F 2  and the F 1 , per step S 418 . The redirection message may include configuration information corresponding to the mobile station and/or the F 2 . The MFIF may be pre-configured to know the configuration information corresponding to the mobile station and/or the F 2 . Also, the MFIF may have previously received a communication from the F 2  informing the MFIF that the F 2  was not operating at a maximum capacity and/or had available resources to permit a call to be redirected. Also, in an alternate embodiment, the steps performed at the MFIF may be performed between the F 1  and the F 2 , such that the two femtos are aware of a load of the presence of overlapping femtos (e.g., partner femtos) and the load on each of the overlapping femtos. 
     Returning to  FIG. 4B , the F 1  forwards the redirection message to the mobile station. In step S 420 , upon receipt of the redirection message the mobile station may send a notification to the F 2  to verify redirection of the outgoing call. If the F 2  sends an ACK as shown in step S 422 , the outgoing call may be resumed with the F 2 , per step S 424 . 
       FIGS. 5A-5C  are signal flow diagrams illustrating a capacity limitation mitigation technique for an incoming call according to various example embodiments. An incoming call is a call intended for a mobile station receiving service from a femto. For the purpose of explanation, the methods described in  FIGS. 5A-5C  can be implemented in the network architectures illustrated in  FIGS. 1 and 2 , but not being limited to these Figures. Therefore, reference numerals are not used in  FIG. 5A-5C . 
     In  FIG. 5A , a femto operating at maximum capacity may send a notification to the MFIF, as shown in step S 500 . The MFIF then receives an incoming call that is intended for the mobile station receiving service from the femto in step S 502 . The MFIF, being aware that the femto is operating at a maximum capacity, refrains from delivering the incoming call to the femto. In this manner, resources at the femto are preserved. Also, the MFIF may initiate a voicemail operation in which the user sending the failed incoming call may leave a message, as shown in step  504 . 
     In another example embodiment, after activating the voicemail operation, the MFIF sends a message to the mobile station notifying the mobile station user that an incoming call may not be delivered, as shown in step S 506  in  FIG. 5B . The notification may include an advertisement regarding femto capacity (e.g., “Buy more femto capacity”). If the user responds to the advertisement in a desired manner, the femto may be allocated a greater capacity of resources automatically and/or at the direction of the femto subscriber. 
     In another example embodiment, an incoming call may be established in the macro cell once it fails to be delivered to the femto. This is possible since the macro cell overlaps the femto cell, as discussed in regards to  FIG. 1 . Also, the MSC corresponding to the macro cell may be registered with the femto and/or MFIF prior to the handover request taking place. In  FIG. 5C , the MFIF may store information about the femto once it is notified that the femto is operating at maximum capacity, as shown in step S 501 . Thus, after the MFIF refrains from delivering the incoming call, the MFIF in step S 508  may send a request for macro cell information to the MSC. The request for information may also include configuration information about the mobile station such that the MSC stores the mobile station configuration information. The MSC then sends the mobile station configuration information to a macro cell base station in step S 510  and sends macro cell configuration information to the mobile station via the MFIF and the femto in step S 512 . Upon receipt of the configuration information, the incoming call may be resumed between the mobile station and the base station, as shown in step S 514 . 
       FIGS. 6A-6C  are signal flow diagrams illustrating a capacity limitation mitigation technique for call handovers from a macro cell to a femto cell according to various example embodiments. For the purpose of explanation, the methods described in  FIGS. 6A-6C  can be implemented in the network architectures illustrated in  FIGS. 1 and 2 , but not being limited to these Figures. Therefore, reference numerals are not used in  FIGS. 6A-6C . 
     In  FIG. 6A , a femto operating at maximum capacity notifies the MFIF, as shown in step S 600 . Thereafter, in step S 602  the MFIF receives a handover request from the MSC. The handover request may be from a mobile station receiving service from the MSC. Since MFIF is aware that the femto is operating at maximum capacity, in step S 604  the MFIF sends a non-acknowledgement (“NACK”) message to the MSC. The call may then continue in the macro cell. 
     Alternatively, in response to receiving the handover request, the MFIF may send a NACK message along with an instruction to the MSC to wait a desired, or alternatively predetermined, amount of time (e.g., “wait x seconds”), as shown in step S 606  of  FIG. 6B . The purpose of the wait instruction is to allow the femto a period of time (“x”) to notify the MFIF if it has freed resources since the previous notification. For example, in step S 608  the femto has freed resources and notifies the MFIF within the desired time interval x. After the desired time interval x has expired, in step S 610  the MSC sends a second handover request. Since the MFIF is aware that the femto has resources available to allow the handover, the MFIF sends an ACK to the MSC, which is thereafter forwarded to the MGCF/MGW, as shown in step S 612 . As a result, a successful handover may take place between the MGCF/MGW and the femto, as shown in step S 614 , such that a call previously being in the macro cell is now in the femto cell. 
     If, however, after the desired time interval x has expired the femto still does not have resource available, the MFIF may: i) send the MSC a NACK and a request to wait an additional period of time; or ii) send the MSC a NACK such that the MSC determines whether to try again or refrain from making any further handover attempts. 
     Nevertheless, an additional alternative to the above discussed example embodiment is shown in  FIG. 6C . In response to receiving the handover request, the MFIF may send a NACK message along with an instruction to the MSC that the MFIF will notify the MSC whenever it becomes aware that the femto has available resources, as shown in step S 616 . In step S 618 , the femto notifies the MFIF that resources are free. In response, in step S 620  the MFIF notifies the MSC that the femto has available resources and requests that the MSC verify whether it still wants to engage in the handover. If the MSC, and/or other network element, still wants to continue with the handover, an ACK is sent to both the MFIF and the MGCF/MGW in step S 622 . In step S 624 , successful handover may take place between the MGCF/MGW and the femto. 
     The example embodiments being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the disclosed subject matter, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosed subject matter.
Example embodiments provide a method and/or network element capable of mitigating one or more effects of operating at full capacity. According to an example embodiment, a network element may address load capacity by identifying that a first network element (e.g., a femto) is operating at a threshold capacity. If a communication from a second network element intended for the first network element is received, an operation is performed that informs the second network element of at least one of (i) that the first network element is operating at a threshold capacity and (ii) that the communication cannot be delivered to the first network element while the first network element is operating at a threshold capacity.