CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     Patent applications entitled “Service Assurance Automation Access Diagnostics” U.S. application Ser. No. 11/316,145 and “Rules Based End-to-End Testing Diagnostics” U.S. application Ser. No. 11/315,437 both filed on Dec. 22, 2005, having the same inventors and assigned to the same assignee as the present invention are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety. 
     FIELD OF INVENTION 
     This invention generally relates to automated diagnostic systems and procedures and, in particular, to apparatus and methods for automated rules based proactive alarm analysis and response in a network. 
     BACKGROUND OF INVENTION 
     An organization, such as a company or a group of companies, may use a virtual private network (VPN) for secure communications over a public network. Failures that affect the reliability of the VPN access circuit may occur anywhere from a user&#39;s premises through the connection path to the VPN-provider network, and may be difficult to diagnose. Failures are costly to a user as a failure may cause loss of data or down time affecting the user&#39;s normal business flow. 
     For example, access problems may reside at various levels in the seven layer open systems interconnection (OSI) model of computer network communication and failures of electronic components, including passive components such as cables, may surface in different communication layers. Physical layer 1 problems can occur at the cabling and signaling interface level where connections are established between network devices. Logical data link layer 2 issues may cause data errors associated with the protocols used on the access circuit. Network layer 3 problems may cause routing errors. Cross-layer interactions can complicate the identification of or otherwise mask the root cause of a component failure. 
     Users can access a VPN network using private lines provided by a VPN-provider, a local exchange carrier, or another alternate access provider. These private lines can be, for example, a 64 kbps circuit conforming to the digital signal 0 (DS-0) telecommunications standard, a line using NxDS-0, a 1.544 Mbps circuit using the digital signal 1 (DS-1) format, a line using NxDS-1, or the like. In many user access circuits, the lines are multiplexed into higher order facilities once they enter an access provider&#39;s network and subsequently enter the VPN provider&#39;s network. This access path, along with the access paths of many other customers, typically terminates on an optical communication hierarchy level X (OC-X) port on a gigabit switch router serving as an access point to the VPN-provider network. Failures in the access path are typically detected by a user long after a failure occurred. The user then has to deal with the consequences of the failure and report the error for service. When a user manually reports a problem in connecting to a VPN, for example, the location of the failure causing the problem is typically not easy to determine and is usually not known to the user. For example, a failure may be occurring with customer premises equipment (CPE), or with a local exchange carrier (LEC), or with the VPN provider. Due to the complexity of a customer network system, variability of equipment used, and use of different access alternatives, it may be quite time-consuming for a VPN provider to pinpoint the cause of a problem. 
     SUMMARY OF INVENTION 
     By proactively responding to failures as they are detected in a virtual private network (VPN) access path rather than waiting for a user to manually report a failure, significant time and resources may be saved in resolving the failure. When a failure is automatically detected, an alarm is generated. The alarm triggers rules based analysis procedures and isolation testing. Based on the testing and analysis, a comprehensive trouble ticket may be generated in response to the alarm. The trouble ticket is customized with specific alarm information allowing for increased efficiency in failure isolation. 
     Among its many aspects, the present invention addresses methods and apparatus for automated proactive alarm analysis and response. To such ends, a method in accordance with one aspect of the invention begins by receiving an alarm, the alarm being an indicator of a problem. Based on codified rules, information concerning the type of alarm and equipment associated with the alarm, an interface test, and an isolation test are determined. The interface test is then run to obtain a status of a communication path associated with the alarm. Based on the status, the isolation test is run to determine a location of the problem to within customer premises equipment (CPE) or a local exchange carrier (LEC), or within network provider equipment. A customized trouble ticket is then generated to reflect said information, said status, and said location of the problem. 
     Another aspect of the invention addresses a computer system for automated proactive alarm analysis and response. The computer system has a memory containing codified rules and a rules based program for running procedures that automatically respond to an alarm. Means are provided for receiving the alarm, the alarm being an indicator of a problem. Also, included in the computer system are means for determining information concerning the type of alarm and equipment associated with the alarm, an interface test, and an isolation test. This determination of information, the interface test, and the isolation test are based on codified rules. Means are provided for running the interface test to obtain a status of a communication path associated with the alarm. Means are then utilized for running, based on the status, the isolation test to determine a location of the problem to within customer premises equipment (CPE) or a local exchange carrier (LEC), or within network provider equipment. Also, means may be advantageously utilized for generating a trouble ticket customized to reflect said information, said status, and said location of the problem. 
     A more complete understanding of the present invention, as well as other features and advantages of the invention, will be apparent from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  illustrates an end-to-end business process automation systems architecture in accordance with the present invention; 
         FIG. 2  illustrates a systems architecture illustrating the flow of automated diagnostic procedures in a rules based environment in accordance with the present invention; 
         FIG. 3  illustrates an example of a typical VPN-access architecture and proactive diagnostic system in accordance with the present invention; 
         FIG. 4  illustrates a method for rules based proactive automated alarm analysis in accordance with the present invention; 
         FIG. 5A  illustrates a method for rules based proactive automated trouble ticket creation in response to MLPPP alarms in accordance with the present invention; and 
         FIG. 5B  illustrates a method for rules based proactive automated trouble ticket creation in response to PPP alarms in accordance with the present invention. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     The present invention will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which several embodiments and various aspects of the invention are shown. This invention may, however, be embodied in various forms and should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. 
       FIG. 1  illustrates an end-to-end business process automation systems architecture  100 . The end-to-end business process automation systems architecture  100  runs on an organization of servers and electronic equipment. A server, for example, is a processing system having one or more processors, memory, input/output units of high capacity and performance, such as, large capacity disk drives and high speed communication devices, and may have a keyboard, a display, and a printer. Server programs, as computer readable media, may be loaded from a disk drive or downloaded through a communication device, for example. Multiple servers are shown as used in the end-to-end business process automation systems architecture  100  and each server may be further configured as a cluster of servers to satisfy performance, capacity, and reliability requirements. 
     The end-to-end business process automation systems architecture  100  uses a rules based process automation (RBPA) program  104  that is operative on an RBPA system server  106 . The RBPA program  104  is used to enforce the consistent application of business rules and policies and is based on predetermined procedures codified in rules. A codified rule may be a conditional statement used to influence a decision made in real time. The codified rules are managed and interpreted independently allowing the codified rules to be changed if needed without having to change the application programs that reference the codified rules. The RBPA program  104  interfaces with customer and network business maintenance and ticketing systems  108 , customer and network inventory databases  112 , provisioning workflow and change management systems  116 , network management and element management systems  120 , and a centralized test platform (CTP)  124 . 
     The customer and network business maintenance platform and ticketing systems  108  use servers and programs to interface with an interactive voice response system  130 , an Internet access portal  132 , and business-to-business gateways  134 . The interactive voice response system  130  uses voice recognition programs and equipment to respond to voice requests, such as, verbal problem reports called in by a user and to send verbal messages and status to users. The Internet access portal  132  uses a computing device to access the Internet and once authorized, gain access to the customer and network business maintenance platform and ticketing systems  108  to create, view, and update trouble tickets concerning, for example, problem reports. The business-to-business gateways  134  use gateway servers and computing devices to provide an access path from a private business network to a global network  136  and interface with the customer and network business maintenance platform and ticketing systems  108  to report, for example, problems with a gateway interface. 
     The customer and network inventory databases  112  are operative on a server running a database of record (DBOR) program  126  which facilitates the accessing of information from a plurality of databases  128 . The databases  128  contain, for example, specific customer and network inventory information, including information related to alarms and support for automatic diagnostic procedures such as loop-back test procedures, useful in the analysis of problems that might occur in the customer and network systems. 
     The provisioning workflow and change management systems  116  are operative on servers using programs that affect the global network  136 . The network management and element management systems  120  are also operative on servers using programs that affect the global network  136 . For example, problems, such as customer specific alarms due to failures or degraded performance, may be automatically reported to one of the network management and element management systems  120  from a specific network element in the global network  136 . The centralized test platform (CTP)  124  is operative on a server and electronic equipment to provide access paths to network elements in the global network  136  for the purposes of supporting automated test programs as directed by the RBPA program  104 . 
     The global network  136  provides end-to-end connection services to users, a virtual private network (VPN), and interfaces with the provisioning workflow and change management systems  116 , the network management and element management systems  120 , and the CTP  124 . 
       FIG. 2  illustrates a systems architecture  200  illustrating the flow of automated diagnostic procedures in a rules based environment. The systems architecture  200  uses a rules based process automation (RBPA) program  204  to respond to events from a monitor program  208  operating on a monitoring system, such as may be found in network management and element management systems  120 . An event detected by the monitor program  208  may be a change in the state of a trouble ticket, an alarm due to a detected failure, or other network problem, such as, a threshold crossing event on dropped packets, degraded performance problems on a communication path, a service order event, or the like. A response to an event may include querying for information and testing sections of a global network, such as global network  136 , using support and test systems  212 . The RBPA program  204  provides an event interface  216 , a distributed broker  218 , codified rules  220 , a process management environment  222 , rule agents  224 , and a support/test interface  226 . The support and test systems  212  include information on network configuration, inventory, and the like, testing and control systems, ticketing systems, service ordering systems, or the like. 
     A flow of automated diagnostic procedures is shown overlaid on the system architecture  200  to illustrate the flow of automated procedures used to diagnose alarms that have been received or problems that have been reported. In order to support automated diagnostic procedures, a set of codified rules  220  are built and loaded into the RBPA program  204  in a first step  230 . 
     When the monitor program  208  detects a problem, such as a customer specific alarm, in its monitored systems, an event  231  is passed to the event interface  216  which generates a normalized event  232 . It is noted that the monitored systems may include customer premises equipment, if so authorized by a customer. A normalized event is a common report file that is used to support multiple different types of events reported by different means. For example, an event may be reported by a voice response system  130 , an Internet message from an Internet access portal  132  or a business-to-business gateway  134 , an element management system alarm from network management and element management systems  120 , or other means for reporting problems. 
     The normalized event  232  is distributed by the distributed broker  218  as an event object  233 . Codified rules  220 , associated with the event object  233 , are selected and applied in the next step  234  by the rule agents  224 . Based on the codified rules  220 , a request object  235 , requesting specific information, is made to the distributed broker  218 . A request  236  is then forwarded to the support/test interface  226 . The support/test interface passes a query/command  237  to the support and test systems  212 . For example, a query may request information access from a database, such as one of the plurality of databases  128  accessed through the DBOR program  126 . The query/command  237  may also be a command for automated testing of a specified component or group of components as supported by the CTP  124 . 
     The answer/outcome response  238  of the query  237  is returned to the support/test interface  226  which forwards a response  239  to the distributed broker  218 . The distributed broker  218  forwards a response object  240  to the rule agents  224  that authorized the original request object  235 . The rule agents  224  then apply procedures codified in the rules to analyze attributes of the response object and may request further information be gathered, additional automated testing be done, manual testing be done, present status of diagnostic processing, request trouble ticket creation, or the like. 
       FIG. 3  illustrates an example of a typical VPN-access architecture and proactive diagnostic system  300 . The VPN-access architecture and proactive diagnostic system  300  contains a VPN core  304 , a VPN-provider access network  306 , an access circuit from a local exchange carrier (LEC)  308 , a customer premises equipment (CPE)  312 , a centralized test platform (CTP)  314 , monitoring system  315 , an RBPA program  316 , customer and network inventory databases  317 , and customer and network business maintenance platform and ticketing systems  318 . The monitoring system  315  may be part of the network management and element management system  120 , for example. 
     When a user attempts access to the VPN core  304 , messages, including alarms of any detected failures, are sent through a customer edge router (CER)  320  which connects to a channel service unit (CSU)  310 . The message path then proceeds to the LEC  308 , and enters the VPN-provider access network  306 . The VPN-provider access network  306  is typically a complex path having many components, such as a point of interface/network interface (POI/NI) unit  322 , a digital signal level 3 cross connect (DSX3) unit  324 , a first multi-services platform (MSP) unit  326 , a first intelligent optical switch (IOS) unit  328 , an IOS-based network  330 , a second IOS unit  332 , a second MSP unit  334 , and a gigabit switch router provider equipment (GSR-PE) unit  336 . The VPN core  304  contains multiple core routers, such as core routers  340 - 343  that are connected to various VPN access paths, such as VPN access path  346 . 
     Customer maintenance on VPN services is typically performed on a reactive basis by the VPN provider in response to a manually reported failure. A specific customer&#39;s VPN service is typically not monitored on an end-to-end basis, unless such monitoring is authorized by the customer. If such monitoring is not authorized, any diagnostic and repair work is not initiated until the customer recognizes the problem, reports it, and authorizes diagnostic services. If proactive alarm monitoring and maintenance is authorized and, for example, the customer&#39;s access path terminates on an optical carrier xx data rate (OCxx) card or gigabit Ethernet card in a gigabit switch router, such as GSR-PE  336 , the VPN provider can proactively monitor customer specific alarms, initiate diagnostic procedures, and create customer specific trouble tickets. The customer specific trouble ticket is, for example, directed to a specific work center and equipment associated with the customer specific alarm. 
     Such proactive diagnostics and customer specific trouble ticket creation may be accomplished before a customer recognizes and reports the problem associated with the alarm. Since manual monitoring of customer specific alarms is time consuming and resource intensive, automated proactive monitoring, diagnostics, and ticket creation provides a more efficient solution to providing a high availability system. As is discussed in further detail below, rules based proactive procedures may provide automated proactive monitoring, diagnostics, and ticket creation and may further be easily tuned to accommodate changes in processes, equipment, and business procedures without extensive software development. 
     Without customer authorization for proactive monitoring, a customer is responsible for detecting and reporting problems with its VPN service. A customer reports a problem to the VPN provider using, for example, the systems depicted in  FIG. 1 , including interactive voice response (IVR)  130 , Internet access portal  132 , business to business gateways  134 , or by directly calling a work or support center and talking to a technician. 
     This manual reporting action will result in a trouble ticket being created in the ticketing systems  108  which causes an event to be sent to the RBPA program  316 . For example, a detected error is encoded in a trouble ticket providing a description of the information available to describe the error. Such information encoded on a trouble ticket may include error type, unit detecting the error, duration and frequency of the error, and the like. This information represents a change in state of a trouble ticket. The event is then processed by the flow of automated diagnostic procedures shown in the rules-based systems architecture  200 . Automated diagnostic procedures may include specific tests of various devices in the VPN access path that are known by the codified rules, for example, to support loop-back testing. This diagnostic path is lengthy as it includes the time it takes a customer to recognize a problem and to report the problem before a trouble ticket can be created that instigates diagnostic procedures. In addition, the recognition and reporting of a problem may be faulty or lacking in specific information which may entail further evaluation time to specifically identify the problem. 
     With customer authorization for proactive alarm maintenance, a problem in the communication path to VPN service may be detected, reported, and proactively analyzed automatically, many times prior to a customer recognizing there is a problem in its VPN access. An automatically reported alarm may be recognized in the VPN-provider access network  306 , for example, at the GSR-PE  336 . The GSR-PE  336  reports the detected alarm to the monitoring system  315  which then forwards the alarm to the RBPA program  316 . Then, based on codified rules, it is determined that the proactive monitoring, diagnostics, and trouble ticket creation process has been authorized for this specific customer. Once authorization is determined, the RBPA program  316  interacts with the centralized test platform  314  and customer and network inventory databases  317  to diagnose the problem. Upon completion of a rules-based prescribed course of diagnostics, the RBPA program  316  interacts with the customer and network business maintenance platform and ticketing systems  318 . The customer and network business maintenance platform and ticketing systems  318  create a customer specific trouble ticket containing diagnostic information obtained through the customer specific diagnostic testing and refer the trouble ticket to a work center appropriate for dealing with the customer specific problem. 
     To support proactive automated diagnostics, equipment on the VPN access path needs to support automated testing such as loop back testing. Devices such as the channel service unit  310  and many digital cross connect systems are designed to respond to a specific code sequence of 1&#39;s and 0&#39;s in a transmission that causes the device to loop the transmission back to the sender. In the case of the CSU  310 , a test message may be encoded for a loop-back test and initiated by CTP  314  acting upon a device in the VPN-provider access network  306  at the request of RBPA program  316 . The CSU  310  receives the message, interprets the loop-back encoding, and sends the message back as requested by the message encoding. The sender device in the VPN-providers access network  306  then receives the test message and can evaluate the response. In this fashion, with devices that support loop-back testing, a test sequence can be setup to test to a point A in the access path, then to a point B, and so forth in order to isolate problems to a specific segment in the VPN access path  346 . Prompt repair of the VPN service requires timely isolation of problems to the VPN-provider access network  306 , the local exchange carrier (LEC)  308 , or the customer premises equipment (CPE)  312 . 
     If the alarm is due to a failure associated with the LEC  308 , the RBPA program  316  identifies the problem as an LEC problem in a trouble ticket and sends the trouble ticket to an appropriate work center. If the alarm is due to a failure in the CPE  312  the RBPA program  316  logs the result in a customer specific trouble ticket, a message is sent to the customer, and a trouble ticket is sent to an appropriate work center. The message sent to the customer may be sent by a phone call from a work center technician or by use of an interactive voice response (IVR) system, such as the IVR  130 . If the alarm is due to a failure in the VPN provider network, the RBPA program  316  identifies the problem as such in a trouble ticket and sends the trouble ticket to an appropriate work center. Based on an analysis of numerous systems, the majority of problems are due to failures detected in CPE  312  or LEC  308 . By having problems proactively isolated to CPE  312 , quality of service improves and time and resources are saved. 
       FIG. 4  illustrates a method  400  for rules based proactive automated alarm analysis. An alarm  402  is received as a trigger for the method  400 . The alarm  402  may be a multi-link point-to-point protocol (MLPPP) bundled T1 alarm, an MLPPP individual T1 alarm, a threshold exceeded alarm, or a low speed point-to-point protocol (LSPPP) alarm, for example. It is noted that a T1 line is a T-carrier signaling scheme used in the telecommunications industry to transmit voice and data over a communication path between devices. An MLPPP bundled T1 alarm indicates the entire T1 bundle of up to eight T1s is down. If an 
     MLPPP bundled T1 alarm is received, it usually means that the customer has no service. An MLPPP individual T1 alarm indicates that only one T1 in a bundle of T1s is down. If an MLPPP individual T1 alarm is received, it usually means that the customer will still be able to send and receive information but will have degraded service. A threshold exceeded alarm indicates that 75% of the T1s in a bundle have problems. An LSPPP alarm indicates the customer has, for example, a T1, an intermediate bit rate (IBR) line, or digital signal 0 (DS-0) service and the service is down. 
     It is also noted that an alarm is instantiated as an alphanumeric string of data. The alarm contains, in the string of data, information, such as, the type of problem or failure occurring, a network equipment identifier indicating the equipment where the problem or failure was recognized, a time stamp indicating the time the problem or failure was recognized, and the like, as may be used by the diagnostic system. 
     The alarm  402  may be received, for example, in the GSR-PE  336  and then forwarded to the monitoring system  315 . The monitoring system  315  examines the alarm data and, for example, does a table lookup from which a customer identifier is determined and added to the alarm data. The monitoring system  315  then sends the alarm to the rules based process automation (RBPA) program  316 . Based on codified rules and examination of the alarm data, the RBPA program  316  determines if the alarm  402  is a layer 2 alarm in decision step  404 . If it is not a layer 2 alarm, the alarm may be either a layer 1 alarm or a layer 3 alarm, for example, and is processed in step  406  by layer 1 diagnostics or layer 3 diagnostics. 
     If it is determined in step  404  that the alarm is a layer 2 alarm, then the process proceeds to decision step  410 . In decision step  410 , it is determined, by examination of the alarm data, whether the alarm should be routed to a network diagnostic and maintenance process or to a customer diagnostic and maintenance process. If the alarm is associated with network problems, the method  400  proceeds to step  412  which continues with network specific diagnostic tests. 
     In decision step  410 , if it is determined, by examination of the alarm data, that the alarm is associated with a problem in the customer premises equipment then the inventory databases are queried in step  416 . For example, the inventory databases, such as customer and network inventory databases  112 , are queried in step  416  for circuit identification (ID), service option, and master customer number, and the like. The circuit identification is a unique identifier for the bandwidth assigned to a particular customer or a bandwidth unit, such as DS-0, DS-1 and the like, that is available to be assigned to a customer. The circuit ID is further linked with facility IDs which relate to specific cable paths and equipment terminations. This information is then linked to the alarm. The service option includes information on whether proactive maintenance is authorized for the customer equipment associated with the failure. The master customer number is a data element that uniquely identifies a specific customer and associated service contract for the specific network equipment associated with the failure. A customer name is typically not used, for example, since a customer may have multiple service contracts or a single service contract may identify equipment and connection paths that have different names. 
     In step  418 , a further check is done to see if there are any other customer entitlements involved. For example, proactive alarm maintenance or certain features of proactive maintenance may be considered as entitlements for certain customers. In addition, certain customer may require status updates on detected failures to be sent every 30 minutes, while other customers may require status updates to be sent every hour. This information affects the failure diagnostic process and is kept available to be recorded in a trouble ticket, as may be necessary. 
     In decision step  422 , it is determined, by examination of the alarm data, whether the alarm is a point-to-point protocol (PPP) or a multi-link point-to-point protocol (MLPPP). If the alarm is not a PPP or an MLPPP alarm, then the method proceeds to step  424  which continues with diagnostic tests for other protocols. If the alarm is determined to be an MLPPP alarm in decision step  422 , then the method proceeds to connecting point MLPPP  426 . If the alarm is determined to be a PPP alarm, then the method proceeds to connecting point PPP  428 . 
       FIG. 5A  illustrates a method  500  for rules based proactive automated trouble ticket creation in response to MLPPP alarms. An MLPPP alarm, such as indicated by the connecting point MLPPP  426  of  FIG. 4 , is received and processed in method  500  beginning with step  504 . In step  504 , a show PPP multi-link interface command is run for each T1 within a bundle of up to eight T1s in a bundle. The show PPP multi-link interface command provides T1 status for each T1 in the bundle. Based on the T1 status, it is determined in decision step  508  whether all T1s are up and running. If all T1s are up and running correctly, the method proceeds to step  510  in which it is noted that the problem has been cleared, recorded, and the automated diagnose procedure may be stopped. 
     If it is determined in decision step  508  that not all T1s are up and running, the method proceeds to decision step  514 . In decision step  514 , it is determined whether there is an existing trouble ticket already in the system for the identified problematic T1 circuits. If there is already a trouble ticket in the system for a failing T1, then the process proceeds to step  516 . In step  516 , the existing trouble tickets for each failing T1 are updated with the new alarm information. Also, in step  516 , the present method  500  is ended for each failing T1 having an associated existing trouble ticket. 
     In decision step  514 , if it is determined that a failing T1 has no existing trouble ticket, the method proceeds to step  518 . In step  518 , a quick monitor auto test is run as an isolation test to determine a location of the problem to the customer premises equipment (CPE)/local exchange carrier (LEC) or the VPN provider network. The quick monitor auto test may, for example, run loop back tests on selected segments of the VPN access path  346  to isolate failures. The method then proceeds to step  520 . In step  520 , a trouble ticket is automatically created and customized to reflect the diagnostic results and the location of the problem. A “degraded service flag” may also be set at this point to notify the work center that the customer has degraded service. 
       FIG. 5B  illustrates a method  550  for rules based proactive automated trouble ticket creation in response to PPP alarms. A PPP alarm, such as indicated by the connecting point PPP  428  of  FIG. 4 , is received and processed in method  550  beginning with step  554 . In step  554 , a show interface command is run for an individual T1 to provides T1 status. Based on the T1 status, it is determined in decision step  558  if the T1 is up and running. If the T1 is up and running correctly, the method proceeds to step  560  in which it is noted that the problem has been cleared and the automated diagnose procedure may be stopped. 
     If it is determined in decision step  558  that the T1 is not up and running, the method proceeds to decision step  564 . In decision step  564 , it is determined whether there is an existing trouble ticket already in the system for the bad T1 circuit. If there is already a trouble ticket in the system for the failing T1, then the process proceeds to step  566 . In step  566 , the existing trouble ticket for the failing T1 is updated with the new alarm information. Also, in step  566 , the present method  550  is ended for the failing T1 having an associated existing trouble ticket. 
     In decision step  564 , if it is determined that the failing T1 has no existing trouble ticket, the method proceeds to step  568 . In step  568 , a quick monitor auto test is run as an isolation test to determine a location of the problem to the customer premises equipment (CPE)/local exchange carrier (LEC) or the VPN provider network. The method then proceeds to step  570 . In step  570 , a trouble ticket is automatically created and customized to reflect the diagnostic results and the location of the problem. A “no service flag” may also be set at this point to notify the work center that the customer has no service. 
     While the present invention has been disclosed in a presently preferred context, it will be recognized that the present teachings may be adapted to a variety of contexts consistent with this disclosure and the claims that follow. 
     For example, the present invention is disclosed mainly in the context of automated proactive analysis and response to alarms. It will be appreciated that variations in the particular hardware and control process employed are feasible, and to be expected as both evolve with time. For example, detailed layer 1 diagnostic information on failures may be processed proactively as well as layer 3 diagnostic information. Other variations may include different approaches to isolation tests as variations or extensions to the quick monitor auto test. Other such modifications and adaptations to suit a particular design application will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art.
Problems are proactively analyzed and responded to as they are detected in a virtual private network (VPN) access path rather than waiting for a user to manually report the problem. When a problem is automatically detected, such as a failure causing degraded performance, an alarm may be generated. The alarm proactively triggers rules-based analysis procedures and isolation testing to diagnose problem in a VPN access path. Based on the testing and analysis, a comprehensive trouble ticket may be generated that is customized with specific alarm information allowing for increased efficiency in problem isolation and saving significant time and resources in resolving the problem.