To analyze the performance of ADMM-PBE0 and sTDA kernels in comparison to highly accurate EOM-CCSD reference data, we restricted investigations to basis sets of triple-zeta size. In Figure the error in the geometrical data is given as normal distributions based on the corresponding MDs and STDs; more detailed statistical analysis and explicit errors listed for each molecule can be found in the SI. To give not only an upper limit for a desired high-accuracy reference, but also a lower reference point of reachable performance, conventional hybrid functional PBE0 results are depicted in black, deviating by MDs of 0.18 pm / -0.75 • / -1.18 • from the EOM-CCSD reference. As for the preceding assessment on the ADMM auxiliary basis size, PBE0 results represent the basis set limit for ADMM computations, a fact which is reflected in the similarity of the PBE0 error distributions with the ones obtained for analogous ADMM computations, colored in orange and red for a tzp auxiliary and a TZVP or TZV2P primary basis, respectively. In comparison, error distributions for sTDA kernels are increasingly broadened when going from PBE0/TZVP to ADMM-PBE0/TZVP+tzp references. The deviation of the semi-empirical results is most pronounced for dihedral angles, with maximum errors amounting up to -13.29 • and -14.1 • for PBE0/TZVP and ADMM-PBE0/TZVP+tzp references.