Figure shows the top two model generation times for ChatGPT-4o and o1-preview regarding each of the 10 papers. The fastest theoretical human answer from the generation OHB1 time is represented by the tallest bar, which unfavorably exceeds any of the generative AI runs. 3.5 Sonnet responses tended to be faster, but had judge scores that were consistently lower. It is worth noting that o1-preview did not return an answer for paper 10, likely because portions of the text were written in Chinese. based on Prompt A1's request for paclitaxel biosynthesis advancements for Paper 08. The generation provided an introduction, five key points to the paper, and a conclusion which were read by the manuscript author and found to be helpful regarding paclitaxel. Each of the main topics were verified by the author of the manuscript to be valid.