[ESO4] has a viscosity of 0.0942 Pa.s lower than the viscosity of [EMIM][HSO4], which has a viscosity of 1.51 Pa.s, therefore viscous forces are a significant parameter to define the conductivity of neat RTIL. The estimated conductivity of the [MMIM][DMP] and [EMIM][DEP] was of 0.141±0.0001 s/m, and 0.079±0.0001 s/m whereas reported conductivity was of 0.084 s/m, and 0.090±0.0001 s/m, respectively (Figure ). Similarly, the estimated conductivity for [EMIM][SCN] and [EAN] was of 2.218±0.002 s/m, and 2.093±0.001 s/m, whereas reported conductivity was of 1.813±0.06 s/m, and 2.259±0.01 s/m, respectively (Figure ). Overall, the estimation of the conductivity of neat RTILs through the measurement of solution resistance with automation follows a good agreement with the previously available conductivity data of the respected RTIL. Therefore, this automated configuration represents a potentially unique approach for rapidly screening RTILs suited for applications where ionic conductivity is a key determining factor. Fig. . Measured ionic conductivities of neat RTILs using the high-throughput setup that are benchmarked against previously reported data at 298 K (Data taken from IL Thermo and IoLiTec).