In summary, we have carried out the largest benchmarking of SA-CASSCF and MC-PDFT to date. This was accomplished by means of an automatic active-space selection scheme and use of a SA-CASSCF error threshold to eliminate poor active-space choices. On a set of 373 aug-cc-pVTZ excitation energies, we find that tPBE0 and NEVPT2 perform with similar accuracy to CC2, while tPBE lags behind. However, the accuracy of NEVPT2 degrades with basis set size even as the quality of the underlying density and on-top pair density appear to remain the same. As expected, we find that tPBE0 is orders of magnitude less expensive than NEVPT2 for larger active spaces, and we recommend its use for the calculation of a broad range of excitation energies, including double excitations.