show excellent agreement with each other (MAE = 0.22 kcal/mol) despite their differing functional forms and the distinct incorporation of dispersion terms, D3 and non-local correlation VV10, in ωB97X-D3 and ωB97M-V, respectively . This indicates that the critical similarity between ωB97M-V and ωB97X-D3, which sets them apart from the Minnesota functional M06-2X or PBE0+MBD, is the range-separation treatment of the DFT functional . Particularly important for QUID systems appears to be the long-range handling of the electron-electron interactions, as the short-range ones differ for the GGA and meta-GGA functionals . In the same vein, we consider the related PBE0+MBD and PBE0+MBD-NL methods (MAE of 0.47 kcal/mol) -we notice that the MBD-NL method increases the deviation compared to MBD in almost all cases except for the dimer with two S atoms and imidazole ligand, SF3I1-3 (see Fig. of the SI). We note that the MBD-NL functional was designed to achieve broad applicability to inorganic solids and molecular systems, while the original MBD (or MBD@rsSCS) method was developed for molecular systems.