Undercured prints showed smaller-than-targeted dimensions while overcured prints showed largerthan-targeted dimensions and oblique walls. Using HA-NB ink, a minimum exposure time per layer (tlayer) of 2 s gave a printed scaffold with the targeted dimensions, while HA-MA required tlayer of 10 s. Surprisingly, the minimum tlayer for HA-AE was also 10 s which did not reflect its faster curing vs HA-MA found in photorheology experiments. The reason for this difference is not known at this point. HA-NB allowed 5-fold faster printing compared to HA-MA, which is comparable to the fold-difference obtained for tgel of the two inks in photo-rheology experiments. The significantly faster printing of HA-NB is particularly interesting in bioprinting, where shorter exposure times minimize cellular photodamage and the time cells are exposed to an environment outside of ideal growth and incubation conditions.