The process that leads to this functional is illustrated in Figure . The parameterization of B95c (see eq. 5) is important in this context. We noted previously that the c σσ = 0.09544 optimized for LH20t is larger than the original parameter (c σσ = 0.038) found by Becke. This reduces somewhat the same-spin DC contribution, which improved performance for, e.g., noncovalent interactions (NCIs) when combined with dispersion corrections. When using Becke's original value with the LH, one can observe even a deterioration of intramolecular NCIs within the GMTKN55 test suite upon adding dispersion terms (see Tables and in Supporting Information for results with a hyper-meta-GGA-based n-LMF). We therefore decided to retain the entire B95c parameterization found for LH20t also for LH24n-B95. Attempts to simultaneously optimize B95c and LMF parameters led to non-physical results. This may have to do with the high flexibility of the n-LMF, which tends to absorb any influence of the DC contribution. This is supported also by a consistent performance improvement of the n-LMF compared to the t-LMF in our initial evaluations when used with different B95c parameters (see Tables in Supporting Information for results with a hyper-meta-GGA-based n-LMF). Retaining the B95c parameters from LH20t also simplifies comparisons between the two functionals, putting the focus squarely onto the LMF. LH24n-B95 has been further augmented by optimizing DFT-D4 dispersion corrections in the prescribed way against the standard S22x5, S66x8, and NCIBLIND test sets, resulting in LH24n-B95-D4. All parameters of the functionals of this work, apart from the n-LMF itself, are summarized in Table in Supporting Information.