We continue the comparison of structural properties by investigating the thermally integrated O(H 2 O) density profile provided by both RISM models with AIMD data. We find that both RISM models are unable to reproduce the expected double peak of oxygen distribution at the interface. The lack of this feature in RISM simulations is in agreement with the aforementioned absence of specific adsorption in the model. Despite this, both RISM models predict a reasonable distance between the water layer and the Pt(111) surface, as well as the relative height of the peak with respect to the bulk concentration. Additionally, we studied the variation of this distribution upon surface charging by performing calculations at different surface charge densities. We found that the oxygen density profile remains relatively constant with charge variations, in agreement with previous studies. However, the orientation of water molecules, varied significantly with the applied potential, with hydrogen atoms pointing away from the surface at positive potentials and towards the surface at negative potentials. This key behavior is correctly captured by both RISM models, which predict a H-down to H-up flip when crossing the PZC.