Table .1 also contains the adsorption energies obtained for all 13 configurations with the different dc-XC functionals. An analysis of correlations analogous to that of Part 1 gives similar results to those discussed above (Table .2), since it is dominated by the absolute adsorption energy values. In order to assess the energetic ordering of different configurations, the energy differences ∆𝐸 𝑎𝑑𝑠 with respect to the Config1 models (relative energies) were calculated (Table .3). Figure While the absolute values obtained with different functionals fall in similar ranges, the relative deviations in individual values may be considerable, especially for small ∆𝐸 𝑎𝑑𝑠 values. Hence, the usefulness of a linear fit through the origin is limited. On the other hand, an analysis of correlations between ∆𝐸 𝑎𝑑𝑠 values can still be insightful. The resulting 𝑅 2 values are compiled in Table .4. Among the (meta-)GGA+D3 functionals, PBE-D3, revPBE-D3, and TPSS-D3