To further investigate the output of the baseline RL and CL experiments, all docking scores of the collected compounds were pooled from the triplicate experiments and the resulting distributions are illustrated in Fig. . Firstly, CL generates a significantly greater quantity of favourable compounds compared to baseline RL, as only those that pass a minimum score based on docking and QED are stored. This is consistent with Fig. where the baseline RL agent struggles for the first 150 epochs, predominantly sampling compounds that do not satisfy the Production Objective. Secondly, compounds generated by CL exhibit more favourable docking scores than baseline RL, on average. Thirdly, between the Curriculum Objectives (Tanimoto and ROCS), the "High" scenario has a greater density of favourable docking scores compared to the "Low" scenario. for individual experiment quantities). 'Favourable Unique Scaffolds' denotes the scaffolds that possess a more favourable docking score than the reference ligand. fraction of 'favourable' scaffolds generated is shown as an annotated percentage.