The extended measurements conducted during the EOP deployment provided more robust comparisons between the two TD methods. Solution 1 produced two to 31 whole-facility emissions estimates at a single facility, at 12 facilities Solution 1 produced more than 10 whole-facility emissions estimates, while Solution 2 produced two to six whole-facility emissions estimates. In contrast, during the baseline period, Solution 1 produced one or two whole-facility estimates, while Solution 2 produced one. The concurrent deployment of the two methods at the same facilities assumes that they (a) captured the same emissions prole, and (b) should produce the same estimated emissions.