We further analyze the ionic conductivity at 415 K against ionic conductivity activation (Figure ). Although there is no underlying trend across the whole simulated polymer space there is an inverse trend of ionic conductivity with activation energy for polymers with higher ionic conductivity. Polymers with highest ionic conductivity have some of the lowest activation energies. Note here, that the points are colored by the fraction of positive charge carriers that we link to Li solvation. Figure shows that there is no trend between Li solvation and activation energy. Of the 4 polymers with low ionic conductivity 3 are carbonates (PEC, PEPC, PDMPC; no other simulated polymer is a carbonate) and SC is a styrene-ester, all of which have also exceptionally low CRU diffusivity (Figure ). When decomposing the coordination environment into the number of unique coordinating polymer chains and the number of unique coordinating anions per environment (5 (e)), we see that the lithium ions in polymers with a high fraction of charged carriers and low transference number (pluses) are surrounded by an average of 1 polymer chain with little Li to anion interaction. This is a disadvantage, as it restricts the Li motion to moving together with the polymer segmental motion. An interesting outlier here is the 3BPEO polymer, which has the highest average number of polymer chains while coordinating with 0.1 anions on average. This coordination of multiple polymer chains theorized by Shah et. al leads the Li to work as a crosslinker of the polymer network, that can lead to the polymer having beneficial viscoelastic properties. Looking at polymers that have high transference number, we see that all of them have at least one anion in the coordination shell (with the exception of PPM). These polymers also exhibit a low fraction of charged carriers, which implies that the Li is not well solvated by the polymer matrix. The lack of Li solvation suggests that Li can move more freely through the system, which naturally indicates a higher transference number. The downside is that there are a large amount of neutral clusters that reduce the available charge carriers that contribute to ionic conductivity. Finally, we report the ionic conductivity against the ratio of the average coordination number and the average coordination shell radius in Figure (f). Here we observe that the majority of the polymer with high conductivity are on the right side of the figure, implying that to find good ionic conductors we need to maximize the coordination number while trying to minimize the coordination shell radius.