To the best of our knowledge, this database stands out as the most extensive and highest quality available in the open literature. We attribute the quality of our data to two key factors: one the one hand, the spectrophotometric titrations used to prepare the solutions and, on the other hand, the preference for liquid weighing (whenever possible) to minimize errors associated with volume measurements. This commitment to high sample quality is reflected on the minimal statistical noise exhibited by the data points presented in section 3. We hope that these results can be of It is important to note that Li et al. utilized a Lovis 2000 M (Anton Paar) falling ball microviscometer that relies on a known density value to compute dynamic and kinematic viscosity. However, they did not specify the origin of this value, whether it was measured, computed, or obtained from the literature. This raises concerns about the accuracy of their results, as it is likely that they used the only densities available in the literature at the time, those by Skyllas et al. . As previously discussed, the lack of precise information limits our ability to further explain the discrepancies between the different datasets.