show the normalized CVs for TEMPO-catalyzed ethanol oxidation obtained from BO-guided and random sampling autonomous experiments, respectively. BO rapidly converged onto a sigmoidal profile within only a few iterations, minimizing hysteresis and yielding CVs suitable for kinetic analysis. In contrast, random sampling produced a wide variety of profiles, failing to consistently identify kinetically insightful conditions. Looking at Figure , we see that BO is more effective at minimizing CV hysteresis in fewer iterations. Notably, BO not only outperforms random sampling, but also provides a greater fraction of CVs that would be useful for kinetic analysis.