Finally, the performance of the CNL model was also evaluated for different CNL mass ranges and collision energies. For these cases, both the standard, matrix, and concentrations samples are included for the assessment. For all mass ranges, with the selected CNL model parameters, a TPr above 96.0% was found (Figure ). However, the FDr did increase for the higher CNL mass ranges. These FDr were 54.9, 70.4, 76.5, and 84.2% for the CNL mass ranges 0-100, 100-200, 200-300, and 300-1000, respectively. The higher FDr performance for the larger CNL masses could be related to the relatively lower number of counts or molecules that cover that range, which can be seen in figure . Additionally, the lower CNL mass range, 0-100, also has a higher overall reduction rate of 25.0%, while the for the other ranges, 100-200, 200-300, and 300-1000, reduction rates of 13.1, 9.8, and 0% were found. A way to account for the difference in performance for the lower and higher CNL masses could be by obtaining or expanding the number of spectra that are available for higher mass compounds.