Next, we examined the principle of Induction using the Socratic prompt: "Given the periodic trend of electronegativity across a period, what can we infer about the acidity of hydrides in the same row?" In response, the model explains the relationship between electronegativity and bond polarity, stating that as electronegativity increases across a period, the bond between hydrogen and the more electronegative element becomes more polar, facilitating proton dissociation and increasing acidity. It provides specific examples, including CH₄, NH₃, H₂O, and HF, to illustrate this trend and explains the underlying factors contributing to the observed acidity pattern. In contrast, when prompted with "What is the trend in hydride acidity?", the model presents a summary of acidity trends both across a period and down a group, attributing the periodic pattern to electronegativity, atomic size, and bond strength. The response provides the same trend as in the Socratic example but does not explicitly draw connections between electronegativity and acidity beyond stating the general factors involved. Both approaches yield correct information about hydride acidity trends. The Socratic prompt guides the model toward explaining the causal relationship between electronegativity and acidity and applying the trend to specific molecular examples, while the non-Socratic prompt provides a more general summary of periodic trends without further elaboration. The distinction lies in the structure of reasoning: the Socratic prompt encourages the model to generate explanations based on an observed pattern, while the non-Socratic prompt presents a direct factual statement of the trend without prompting additional reasoning steps.