The analysis of the TDM in Fig. demonstrated that transitions beyond 4 eV have a dominant MLCT character, whereas transitions occurring at lower energies have an MC character. All three ground-state geometries result in three absorption peaks, though with varying levels of accuracy if compared with the experiment. Especially the oscillator strengths appear to vary strongly, which may be due to the weak nature of these transitions causing high relative numerical errors. The best agreement is achieved using either the OPBE or MP2 equilibrium geometry, which are the two geometries that align better with the experiment in comparison to the B3LYP one. Both BSE@GW and TDDFT appear to produce comparable results in quality. However, the BSE@GW transitions are shifted towards lower energies compared to their TDDFT counterparts. Especially in the case of the energetically highest absorption peak, this appears to be more accurate, as TDDFT tends to overestimate the transition energy.