Results of this experiment are shown in Fig. . Subplots show optimization traces over 200 evaluations corresponding to the redoxmer candidate objective values with the best scalarized merit. Each ASF campaign was repeated 40 times. Most notably, the hierarchy and absolute tolerances provided to Chimera modulate which property values are considered advantageous. Chimera sacrifices slightly the achieved value of the first objective compared to all other ASFs, and the value of the second objective compared to Hypervolume. As a consequence, Chimera is able to achieve a significantly lower G solv than all other ASFs. Importantly, the Chimera solutions still satisfy tolerances on the first two objectives. The Weighted Sum strategy appears to suffer from the well-known difficulties associated with choosing weighting schemes that result in desired solutions and over-prioritizes minimization of λ abs , in turn restricting values of the latter two objectives to be sub-optimal. Hypervolume provides a well-balanced multi-objective optimization of the redoxmer candidates, and, unsurprisingly, generates Pareto fronts which have on average the largest dominated hypervolume (Fig. ). The dominated hypervolume facilitates assessment of Pareto fronts by summarizing their characteristics (such as proximity to the Pareto front, diversity and spread) with a single scalar value. To reinforce that the choice of ASF modulates which redoxmer candidates are deemed desirable, we discuss the frequency at which each R-group option is featured in high performing candidates. Fig. shows the relative frequency with which each R-group option is included in top-20 redoxmer candidates, as ranked by each ASF. The underpinnings of the ASFs, as well as the preference information encoded by the user often results in stark differences in the rate of occurrence of specific chemical substituents in candidates that are deemed desirable. For instance, top candidates according to Chimera and Hypervolume almost exclusively feature the ether substituent at the R 1 position (R 1 1 ), where as Weighted Sum and Chebyshev top candidates feature both the ether and perfluorinated substituents at roughly the same rate. Also noteworthy is the relatively strong preference of Chimera and Hypervolume for the dimethylamine group at the R 2 and R 3 positions (R 8 2,3 ), the preference of Weighted Sum and Chebyshev for R , and Hypervolume for R 4 . Ultimately, this case study demonstrates how the choice and parameterization of ASF for a multi-objective materials discovery campaign affects the properties (and therefore the structure) of the resulting candidates. Olympus provides users with the means to quickly develop intuition on how certain ASF choices might in-fluence the outcome of data-driven experimental campaigns.