-Let us consider the data in the Figure of Giarola et al., 2010. We assume the positions of the centers of the two q-Gaussians as can be observed in the figure by Giarola et al. In the following Figure , the two q-Gaussians fitting onto these data is proposed. To observe the difference between q-Gaussian fitting and Lorentzian fitting, let us compare for Ohsaka and coworkers' data. Of course, we can reduce the misfit by increasing the number of components. Using three q-Gaussians at n=220, 257, 315, the sum of the deviations squares is strongly reduced to value 2.7 x 10 -3 . However, what could be the reason for the existence of a third components? The presence of defects? Ohsaka et al. are also providing data at room temperature. Here the fitting with two q-gaussians. Let us use the data as in the Figure , and fit two q-Gaussians, with centres at the same positions given by Frank and coworkers. We can improve the fit by adding components. Using the same positions of the centres of the components given by Giarola et al., that is 512 and 518 cm -1 , we have the following results for RRUFF R060277 depolarized. However, we can also consider the positions given by Ohsaka et al., that is 513 and 519 cm -1 , in the range about 516 cm -1 . We have observed before that RRUFF 060277 has the peak at 517 cm -1 . Let us shift the positions of components to 514 and 520 cm -1 , and fit onto the data. Let us consider also a fit using Lorentzian functions, that is we force the value of q-parameters to 2.