The analysis of the O and H positions showcases not only the water structure but also the water orientation to the metal surface. As shown in the graphs in Figure , the first peak of the hydrogen atom density decreases with increasing potential and the second peak increases, meaning that the water molecules turn their orientation. In general, at high potentials, the first H peak disappears. The most intense O-atoms peak has a stable position at ≈ 3 Å during the simulation at all potentials for all the systems, with results comparable to theoretical and experimental 61 works. As the potential increases, the structure of the water layers becomes unclear in simulations with ions, whereas in pure water simulations (Figure ), the water layers consistently maintain a distinct structure, as evidenced by the oxygen distribution peaks. The loss of clear water solvation shells is attributed not only to the potential but also to the presence of the ion, in fact, the water distribution is clearer for the pure water simulations, see Figure (a). It is always possible to distinguish the first peak of the oxygen and the second one, whose intensity is half of the first O-peak. In simulations containing ions, the intensity of the first oxygen peak decreases with increasing potential, whereas it remains nearly unchanged in pure water simulations, indicating a reduction in water coverage. In this simulation setup, there is no bulk-water region, so we observe a drop of structured water in proximity of the jellium region. From the ionic distribution profiles, we notice that for the simulations with alkali and alkali hydroxides, the ion is localized in a position of 2 Å throughout the simulation, with the only exception of the K simulation, which shows higher mobility of the ion. It is difficult for the ion to move because of the high concentration in the small supercell. Combining the analysis of both angles and the information from Figure , we can obtain information on the water reorientation with the potential and its transitions.