To explore how each selection strategy (IPs, STD, EI, PI) focuses on distinct or overlapping regions of the MOF design space, we compared their chosen subsets across four structural properties: VF, LCD, PLD, and SA. We only show the results for the IPs in this manuscript; however, we refer the readers to the SI for the STD, EI and PI results. Visualization of the material space is done in the principal component space, but we stress that the GPs used the structural properties of MOFs and the pressure, once preprocessed, as inputs for adsorption prediction.