As discussed in the introduction, it has been previously observed that solvent evaporation is composed of two drying regimes, first the slurry shrinks until its final thickness (defining the final AM backbone) and then the pores start emptying. In the computational procedure developed here, the final AM backbone was defined by freezing the AM particles when reaching a desired thickness (associated to a bulk porosity of ~46%) for all the evaporation rates considered. This strategy allows having approximately the same macro features (porosity, density, loading) for electrodes dried at different drying rate, enabling to focus on the only effect of evaporation rate on CBD migration and its impact on the electrode features. In addition, it should be stated here that an important aspect of our computational workflow is the implicit consideration of the nanoporosity of the (solid) CBD phase by volume expansion of the latter, as we discussed previously and similarly to the approach of Srivastava et al. Similarly to our previous works, here we considered a nanoporosity of ~50%, as found experimentally. Along this manuscript, we will refer to "bulk" porosity when considering the pore phase only, while as "overall" porosity when accounting for the bulk pores + the CBD nanoporosity.