During the reviewing stage of our manuscript, one of the reviewers made us aware of a preprint that presented an analysis of more than 40 TDA-DFAs belonging to the first four rungs of Jacob's Ladder on a large part of the QUEST database, including parts of its radical test set, with the same basis set applied herein. The reviewer asked us to compare their bestperforming method with the herein assessed TD(A)-DHDFAs, but it turns out that a direct comparison with that data was difficult, as the preprint analyzed 42 doublet-doublet excitations without any information on exactly which excitations had been left out. Moreover, only the values for some select RMSDs were given instead of all assessed methods, and the values of other statistical data were not provided. Their RMSD of 0.313 eV for TDA-CAM-B3PLYP is slightly above ours (0.29 eV), but within reason we can still make a rough comparison between the preprint and our present study. The best RMSD that we could find for the radical set in the preprint is the rangeseparated hybrid ωB97X-V, 83 which contains a reparametrized exchange-correlation expression of the herein assessed ωB97X. That RMSD was reported as 0.275 eV, which is comparable to the herein obtained value of 0.27 eV for TDA-PBE0, a DFA whose RMSD was not presented in the preprint. We also note that our value for TDA-ωB97X has a lower RMSD of 0.21 eV. Most importantly, a total of 31 TD(A)-DHDFs have lower RMSDs than the best performing DFA from that study, which demonstrates again how double hybrids are superior to hybrids or other lower-rung functionals (see SI for RMSD values).