Energy components obtained from the Ziegler-Rauk EDA, applied to DFT+D calculations, also correlate well with energy components from SAPT(DFT). These correlations are illustrated in Fig. for the S66 dimers and they are quite remarkable in most cases, with the only exceptions being dispersion energies for hydrogen-bonded complexes (R 2 = 0.706) and induction energies for dispersion-dominated complexes (R 2 = 0.565). In those two cases, however, the energy component in question is quite small, and correlations improve significantly if E disp and E ind ). These are the same data as in Fig. . are summed, as suggested elsewhere. Most importantly in the present context, the correlation between the D3(BJ) correction and the SAPT(DFT) dispersion energy is very strong for both the dispersion-dominated and mixed-influence subsets of S66, with R 2 > 0.9 in both cases, while the same is true for total interaction energies across all three subsets of S66. In these DFT+D calculations, which were performed using BLYP+D3(BJ), the authors simply equate E disp with the numerical value of the D3(BJ) correction, which is compared in Fig. to a scaled SAPT(DFT) dispersion energy computed in a double-ζ basis set. (The scaling is a correction for basis-set incompleteness. )