in the distribution profile for the coarse-grained simulations with respect to their atomistic reference, as clearly seen for the first two reported angles of Glcβ(1→6)Glcβ and Manβ(1→6)Manβ in Figure . Interestingly, when looking at the difference in the averages for those two angles for each disaccharide, only the second angle of Manβ(1→6)Manβ shows a relative difference of 5.93%, whereas the others span values from 0.3% to maximum 2.99% deviation. Similarly for the dihedral angle distribution of Glcβ(1→6)Glcβ, a clearly different profile can be seen for coarse-grained and all-atom data, nonetheless the difference in the means of both distributions is only 1.45%. This perhaps shows the importance of looking at the distribution profiles alongside mean values for a good qualitative and quantitative comparison.