The Part II extracellular metabolites table performance with supporting evidence was primarily limited to the model with the most advanced reasoning, o1-preview. This is due to the demands of processing a 139x38 table, followed by a second prompt in the same conversation requesting a very large table with updated values, combined with breakthrough analysis for each entry. In specific, the second prompt asked for a new revised table based on 11 additional summaries, this time asking for how LLMs and other authors' methods will produce improved results. The specific restrictions set by the author regarding 4 days of kinetic data corresponding to 4 columns for 1 of 3 main experiments was chosen (CHL-YN-IgG1 (B-08) rep1) to avoid high dimension limitations in processing too many relationships. The five other models tested were limited in displaying authors' original numerical values accurately (3.5 Sonnet, ChatGPT-4o, L3.1-405B), was limited to a single author reference (3 Opus), had inaccurate headings (L3.1-405B), or was slow and addressed a limited number of time points (Herm-405B). Herm-405B was also the only known model running at a lower fp8 precision by the inferencing service, which may have affected performance. The limitations associated with the Part II intracellular metabolites table were similar to the extracellular experiments, but processed less metabolites at a table size of 104x14 seen in Figure .