The total energy density was 5.337 (Wh/kg), and the potential energy was 2456.163 (W/kg). Each prototype was tested over 8 trials to produce the most accurate, viable, and valid results. These averages not only exceeded the engineering goal but also exceeded industry standards. Figures and showcase different trials' energy and power density levels. The cost of each supercapacitor was found using specific formulas and equations that helped determine each unit cost of the created supercapacitor that was created. First, the unit cost of the novel electrode materials was calculated. Around 100 grams of the novel electrode structure was made but not all were used to create the supercapacitor. Then, other factors, such as the electrode material, binder solution, and electrolyte, were calculated. This made the cost of the prototype created come to be approximately $10.03. This is comparable to other companies that cost around $50 -100 for a supercapacitor with a lower energy density. Also, the materials used in those prototypes are generally very corrosive and harmful to the environment. This cost truly outweighs the other expenses in the market and puts this prototype in the #1 spot. Figure below showcases a cost analysis graph showcasing my prototype compared to other market competitors. Another concern while developing this prototype was whether the supercapacitor could be practical given its linear discharge rate, so many efforts were made to minimize it. These efforts were successful as the linear discharge rate for the novel electrode I created was significantly lower than the control for this experiment, which was a supercapacitor with raw MnO2. The linear discharge graph showcased in Figure accurately portrays this as the discharge rate for my prototype, which is indicated in blue, takes much longer to discharge completely. The novel prototype also had 22 discharge and charge cycles that were also done to see if it could withstand multiple trials and show no signs of degradation. It is clear that the prototype is successful in maintaining the same capacitance levels even after vigorous use and shows no signs of degradation. Table below showcases every trial run on the novel prototype. T1 represents the time in seconds required to charge the prototype the first time. DT represents the minutes necessary to discharge the supercapacitor after being charged. T2 represents the time in seconds needed to charge the prototype 2nd time, and C represents the capacitance level. The prototype's original capacitance value was 0.90367 F, and the trial average was 0.9124 F, indicating no degradation occurred after the charge and discharge cycles.