Because SAPT2+(3) affords total interaction energies in good agreement with CCSD(T) benchmarks, we take its energy components as benchmarks for other EDAs. Broadly speaking, there is reasonable agreement amongst these methods (and with the benchmarks) for E elst and E exch , although the SAPT(HF) method slightly exaggerates electrostatic interactions for two of the hydrogen-bonded complexes where those interactions are largest but still affords sub-kcal/mol accuracy (MAE = 0.7 kcal/mol). However, that method significantly underestimates exchange-repulsion in many of the hydrogen-bonded dimers and the MAE is 3.6 kcal/mol for that component, with a maximum error of 6.1 kcal/mol. The two methods that use LRC-ω GDD PBE wavefunctions for the monomers are much more accurate for these two energy components.