As shown in Tab.3, the discrepancy is apparent, though most data are comparable. For example, the reference length is 121 pm for the O2 molecule . However, in this paper, the radius of an O atom is 48 pm. The bond length of O2 is longer than the two-fold radius of an O atom. It is a widespread phenomenon. Moreover, in this paper, the longer bond produces the lower temperature of paired electrons. For example, the bond lengths of N2 and O2 are 97 and 83 pm, corresponding to the bond energies of 382 and 448 kJ/mol, respectively. However, inversely, the longer bond gives the lower enthalpy in the reference. For example, in the references , the bond energies of O-O and F-F is usually averaged to provide 146 and 159 kJ/mol, corresponding to the bond lengths 121 and 141 pm, respectively. It is a paradox to common sense. Based on the concepts in this paper, those data are not acceptable. Therefore, the energies of N-N and O-O close to the calculated values are selected in Tab. 3. F-F 159 kJ/mol is also anomalous, but we cannot find the proper one.