In Table , reduced but comparable retrieval accuracies for space group were achieved compared to the supervised training using ALIGNN , the same architecture used for CLICS. Note that randomly selecting a space group has about 0.43% chance to contribute the top-1 accuracy. We did not perform supervised learning of the local atomic environments, which have non-constant numbers of ground truths. For reference, the top-1 and 5 accuracies from CLICS were even higher than those for space group. Although it is not straightforward to estimate the chance to randomly hit one of multiple local atomic environments, the top-1 and 5 accuracies at the start of training were 0.34% and 6.3%, which indicate meaningful accuracy gains by CLICS. for comparison against retrieved concepts. The number after each element symbol indicates an equivalent position of the atom. The pink colored texts highlight correct retrievals. The purple colored texts highlight reasonable retrievals but requiring careful consideration. The green colored boxes highlight the correspondences between words or sentences.