For CXI ID 83, both data quality indicators CC 1/2 and I/σ show higher values in all resolution shells in comparison to XGandalf, in accordance with the higher redundancy. The performance was further analyzed in Figure , showing the subset of frames uniquely indexed by TORO (5279 patterns, dashed black) and XGandalf (72 patterns, dashed red), respectively. The three metrics demonstrate again, that the patterns uniquely indexed by TORO add meaningful data to the full dataset. It's worth noting that for ID 83, XGandalf's performance on its uniquely indexed frames is less consistent, appearing to capture mostly noise. TORO also consistently outperforms MOSFLM on all metrics, despite both having comparable redundancy. This discrepancy may arise because MOSFLM's indexing solution often captures poorer indexing solutions, contributing to an increase in redundancy counts, but leading to lower quality as indicated by its I/σ.