In reaction 17, propene is the desired target, however the prediction questionably provides methane as a single precursor. This is a very unlikely transformation, despite the target molecule being one of the most basic alkenes. In the final retrosynthesis, reaction number 92, we see another example of a lack of atom conservation. The target is a simple internal alkyne which could be synthesized using a substitution reaction. Though the set of predicted precursors does attempt a substitution, the set of starting materials has a total of 4 carbons while our target is a five-carbon compound. Seventeen (17) of the predicted retrosynthesis outcomes were not predicted to be successful by the forward prediction model. All of these were cases where the forward prediction failed to return a result, indicating that the predicted synthetic route was unlikely to succeed even by the standards of the model itself. Similarly to the forward prediction results, the performance of the retrosynthetic prediction model was satisfactory. While no failures were explicitly reported, users should be conscious of prediction confidence when considering the validity of each retrosynthesis. The mappings for reactions 12 and 20 are also reasonable, however they both have low confidence, indicating a poor quality transformation. Finally, the mapping for reaction 92