In our study of FERC-2222 we make two simplifications in our model. First, we collect all traditional fossil-based suppliers into one stakeholder to represent their sales to the power grid. The post-FERC market emphasizes competition between traditional energy providers and renewable DERs, with pre-2222 policy putting MP systems at a competitive disadvantage. This aggregate supplier bid sets the electricity price for the consumer in the SCM (i.e., determining the electricity price on the wholesale market. Its capacity is equal to the state's annual demand). This formulation simplifies our model, and allows us to focus on policy interpretations. Our second simplification is our representation of Wisconsin electricity demand using a single consumer. Real electricity markets have multiple hubs from which electricity is distributed to end consumers, with prices tracked at specific nodes in the power grid. In the case of MISO, there are eight hubs and more than 300 nodes where prices are determined . Our simplification represents electricity prices within Wisconsin at a single hub price. We model a single electricity price in order to avoid obscuring our primary result. FERC-2222 improves how MP systems (DERs) compete in the wholesale market and could affect the price the market operator pays to source electricity for its retail customers. Modelling a single demand means that we do not observe any variation in consumer demand or pricing, but this does not impact the qualitative nature of our results with respect to FERC policy.