Table . Properties of fluids sampled from three geothermal production wells in France and the Netherlands. Experimental data from . Samples S1-S3 and G1-G3 correspond to fluids (liquid and gas, respectively) from wells in France, whereas S4-S5 and G4-G5 correspond to samples from the Netherlands. To calculate the bubble point pressure for the fluid systems described in Table , the solution and gasphase compositions were defined in PHREEQC and Reaktoro. Some of the compositions for the aqueous and gas fluids show charge and mass imbalance, respectively. To ensure solution electroneutrality, the charge was balanced with Cl -. To keep the mass balance, the gas concentrations found in the atlas were normalized. Moreover, it is uncertain whether the GLR was normalized to standard conditions (e.g., 1 atm and 273.15 K) or whether it is reported at the sampling temperature. Thus, the bubble point pressure is estimated considering both cases. The comparison between PHREEQC and Reaktoro and the experimental data is shown in Figure . The consistency between the models and the experimental data is fair only for one sample from the Netherlands and two from France. Moreover, the predicted bubble point pressure is impacted considerably by the conditions at which the GLR is reported. Considering that the GLR is reported at the production temperature leads to a bubble point pressure in better agreement with the experimental value. in the Netherlands and degassing pressures predicted with PHREEQC and Reaktoro. Solid bars were calculated considering that the GLR was reported at standard conditions (i.e., 1 atm 273.15 K), whereas hatched bars were calculated considering that the GLR was reported at the production temperature conditions (values included in Table ).