In addition, the nuclear configurations that correspond to the MECIs are also quite similar between the ab initio MRCI methods and DFT/MRCI(2). Thus, the differences that two exist between the methods correspond to particular aspects of the intersection topography. Specifically, the only systematic differences were observed in the magnitude of the tilt parameters. However, the ratio of quantities did not exhibit systematic differences with ab initio MRCI and thus comparisons of metrics intended to be predictive of reactive outcomes (P and B of Eq. 15) following passage through a ConIn were in general favorable.