For complex 2 again all computations were performed using the range-separated functional LC-BLYP (α = 0.2, ω = 0.08). Overall, the same systematic pattern as in the previous G 0 W 0 -LC-BLYP evGW-LC-BLYP evGW-LC-BLYP-TDA DFT-LC-BLYP-TDA Experiment two examples persists as shown in Fig. . BSE@GW offers a substantially more accurate description of the electronic system than TDDFT. Especially the misplaced lowest TDDFT absorption peak at 3.5 eV shows a significant improvement in the sense that BSE@GW predicts lower transition energies as well as the double peak structure. In contrast however to the prior two systems, BSE@GW states beyond 3.75 eV appear not adequately described, being misaligned with the experiment. In fact, the G 0 W 0 -BSE result involving the rangeseparated functional incidentally aligns best with the experiment, due to the strong blue shift of the BSE@evGW results.