From the historical perspective, the blanket application of EM with small LB factors is a relic of the inherent sensitivity challenge of NMR spectrometers. While relatively high-field instruments have been available for about four decades, sensitivity specifications have always been important and an object of a certain degree of contempt (as reflected by the common use of thin-walled NMR sample tubes in instrument specification). In this context, EM processing with small LB values represents a means of enhancing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) specifications. Notably, such SNR-based specifications abstract the NMR spectrum from the FID as the actual raw data output of the spectrometer. However, as many modern NMR spectrometers, including entry-level cryomagnetic instrumentation (300-400 MHz), exhibit significantly improved sensitivity specifications, especially when equipped with cryoprobes, the historic habit of blanket EM processing should be reconsidered. Considering the relationship between resolution and SNR, it is important to emphasize that high-SNR HNMR spectra are more readily susceptible to resolution enhancement processing (e.g., Lorentzian-Gaussian multiplication using a negative LB). This opens an opportunity for extracting more (precise) structural and quantitative information from the same raw NMR data (FID): the application of resolution-enhancing pre-FT window functions, or the use of non-FT methods such as CRAFT, offer great potential for generating a better understanding of HNMR spectra. The resolution power (see definition above) inherent to modern NMR spectrometers is generally superb and, depending on the specifics of the molecule (rigidity/flexibility, relaxation, exchange, and other dynamic properties) and proper operation can readily resolve peaks and lines that are apart by as little as 0.2 Hz. In this context, regular instrument performance checks with the classical CHCl3 lineshape sample (1% CHCl3 in acetone-d6) is a very worthwhile and even necessary exercise.