We present these results as a broad comparison of water models performed under consistent simulation conditions. We anticipate that this will be a useful reference for the properties of these models (some of which are not found elsewhere), and as a benchmarking and comparison dataset for future studies. We deliberately have not classified the models in terms of 'best' or 'worst', as the 'best' water model will depend on the specific application. This work also serves as an update to other excellent water model comparisons. For example, in 2011 Vega and Abascal performed a comprehensive comparison of water models for a variety of properties and ranked TIP4P/2005 as the best, 149 but every 4-point model published since 2011 exhibits a better average agreement with experimental values for the structural and dynamic properties studied here.