For Cz-AQ (Figure , ESI), we find broadly the same story: PBE and PBE0 overestimate the amount of CT character of the lowest lying states and underestimate the energy of the bright state, while ωB97X-V underestimates the CT character and severely overestimates the energy of the bright state. The main differences between ωPBEh and CAM-B3LYP are the energy of the bright singlet CT state, with ωPBEh providing a better value relative to the experimental absorption maximum, and the ordering of the states with respect to the state character. With the ωPBEh functional, we find a similar mixture of local ππ * / nπ * and CT states as for ri-ADC(2). The only difference is that the relative energies of the nπ * states are somewhat raised yielding a different ordering of the dark low-energy states. However, as discussed above, ri-ADC( ) is expected to slightly underestimate nπ * state energies, thus supporting the description by ωPBEh.