Baltimore Aircoil values are obtained by screen-scraping BAC's online performance estimation tool for three models: 1) PC2-509-1218-30, 509 nominal ton, R22, condensing tower, and models 2) FXV-0812B-12D-J and 3) FXV-1212C-16Q-K, which are 98 ton and 123 ton, respectively, glycol, closed-circuit cooling towers. Only the FXV-1212C_16Q-K tower is used in the dry cooling tower regressions as irregularities were found with the FXV-0812B results. Vendor-supplied budgetary numbers were obtained of: 106,000, 68,000, and 110,000 2013$ for the PC2, FXV-0812, and FXV-1212 units, respectfully. This same data was used in Adams et al. (2015) only to report parasitic load fraction; however, it is shown in this study for both parasitic load fraction and cost. The parasitic load fraction data is also re-regressed here using a different model for a better fit. Both wet and dry closed-circuit towers are examined.