The tendencies to fail are also similar: 3% for "Robocrystal" and 4% for "Spacegroup". Thus, since "Robocrystal" involves more superfluous details in the text, it appears that this supplemental information that is not necessarily relevant for adaptation to code seems not to improve performance of the model. We note that, for future use, we expect the model's ability to successfully predict sites will vary depending on whether the requested structure is similar to those in the training dataset.