Overall, the data suggest that the presence of defects and the toughness of the interface region are important factors in determining the material's resistance to cracking. The material is more likely to deflect rather than penetrate when there are more defects present and at lower toughness values. This is an interesting finding, as it has not been observed in previous studies. Further investigation may be necessary to fully understand the mechanisms behind these effects and to explore the potential for engineering these features to optimize the performance of these materials in various applications. As we observe, a non-linear trend is present when defects are increased. This is similar to our previous study with the the non-angled interface, where we observed not much change for the lower defect amounts, but exponential increase over the addition of higher amounts of defects. A stark difference we observe is that at 0 defects, there is deflection occurring at the second interface toughness case as well. This is an important observation as with the non-angled interface, we saw 0 cases of deflection at the 0 defect mark. Overall, with 10 defects we see a stark difference compared to the non-angled case as well, due to the fact that 10 defects was the same amount of deflection cases as 5 and 7 defects. We see a large difference here however, with an increase of 2 deflection cases compared to the 7 defect cases. After this, we see even larger increases in deflection amounts at 15 defects and 17 defects, as there is 9 deflection cases and 10 deflection cases respectively at these cases. Again, this is a stark difference with a near perfect record of deflection and an increasingly exponential trend from the lower defect to higher defect amount transitions. In our non-angled interface study, we did not observe any cases of deflection at 10 interface toughness, which implies a homogeneous material with the bulk of the material also having a toughness of 0.1 MPa. This means that the defects influenced the crack propagation path enough that it followed the path laid out by the defects. This showcases the sheer influence of the defects on the crack's behavior.