The developed NSDRA maturity indicators provide guidance about what should be included in a nanosafety-related dataset, set a specific format, and define a schema of how to represent the metadata of these datasets in an interoperable machine-readable way. Moreover, we believe that adopting the linked-data formats for data sharing and reuse would advance the field of nanosafety by facilitating data curation and collection, data quality and completeness assessment, and data-driven modeling. Additionally, while there are various assays/techniques for determining many of the measured variables defined in our maturity indicators, there is no intention to enforce specific protocols or highlight their advantages or disadvantages. However, reporting the used experimental assays and protocols is an integral part of making nanosafety data reusable. Furthermore, the undergone effort of defining nanosafety community-related metadata standards in compliance with FAIR subprinciple R1.3 was not meant to add to the experimental workload routinely required in this field. However, many of these variables/parameters are calculated or measured by default, and reporting them in the data and metadata should not be a significant effort. Finally, special attention was given to reporting standards that include characterization properties for the nanomaterials and properties related to the experiment both in vitro and in vivo to emphasize the importance of such variables and encourage researchers to report them in their datasets.