Table shows average generation times for leading models o1-preview and L3.1-405B. The impact of the model cumulative times vs. the fastest theoretical human answer over the course of the four prompts is depicted in Figure . In specific, the sum of eight generative AI prompts was significantly lower than the Optimal Human time, and represents Advancement #2: GenAI Speed Across Prompts. The quality of the results to compliment the speed-ups are apparent in A low judge score of 6.5 received by Mix8x22B Prompt B1 generation was reflected by it's limitations in analyzing the Paper 01 summary, and not the entire 10 Paper summary, followed by a "Lack of Retrobiosynthesis Focus" as stated by the judge. Similarly, the Mix8x22B Prompt B4 generation received a low score of 7.5 for Prompt B4 by the judge due to "Lack of Specificity in Challenges" and "No Mention of Specific Tools or Technologies", as seen in supplementary S5.