We find that the DFT-3c methods and ωB97X-D3BJ/6-31++G(d,p) all perform well, both in regard to finding the correct lowest minimum cluster configuration and based on overall RMSD. The fact that ωB97X-D3BJ/6-31++G(d,p) performs well compared to higher level methods based on a large test set further strengthens its wide utilization in cluster formation studies. Based on computational timings the B97-3c and r 2 SCAN-3c methods look very promising for obtaining accurate geometries at a reduced computational cost. For the cluster sizes investigated here ωB97X-3c and ωB97X-D3BJ/6-31++G(d,p) are comparable in accuracy and speed, but for larger systems ωB97X-3c might have an advantages in computational cost.