Figure and 3b demonstrate the correlation plot results using exponential decay processing while Figures demonstrate results using non-exponential processing. As mentioned previously, the resulting relaxation time values between the two types of processing methods are very similar but, accurate quantification requires non-exponential processing. Figure compares the two methods. In the pre-milling Figures and, the most intense peak is located at T1 of 28.8 s in both types of processing for the same sample. The T2* varies from 11 µs for exponential processing to 21µs for non-exponential processing. In the post-milling figures 3b and 3d, the main peak is situated at 0.78 s and 16 µs for exponential processing and 0.67 s and 29 µs for nonexponential processing, for T1 and T2*, respectively. The liquid peak, found at a longer T2*, has a value of 25 µs for exponential processing and 270 µs for non-exponential processing. The relaxation times are summarized in table of the supplementary information. The minor differences from our previous ZIF-8 results in figure are due to measurements being run on different days. In this case, humid lab conditions could be responsible for water contamination and a liquid peak at a longer T2* in the pre-milling plots.