G is strongly affected by solvent adsorption (i.e., wetting) at the interface, scaling with the strength of the interaction between the solid and liquid atoms. To account for how differences in wetting at the gold-water interface may affect the curvature and temperature dependence of G, we modeled two wetting conditions: a moderate wetting case using the gold-water interaction parameters developed by Merabia et al. to reproduce a gold-water contact angle < 30°, as well as a poor wetting case in which we reduced the gold wettability by decreasing the strength of the gold-water interaction by roughly a factor of 4. There are three reasons to consider multiple wetting conditions for the gold-water interface. First, there are various parameterizations of the gold-water interaction available in the literature with different parameter values and energy functions, the particular choice of which can affect both the wetting and thermal interface conductance. Second, the standard 12-6 Lennard-Jones potential we used to model the gold-water interaction (Equation ) does not explicitly include image charge effects arising from polarization of the metal atoms at an interface, which can also affect adsorption at the metal surface. Polarization can also affect the thermal interface conductance. Lastly, the hydrophilicity of solid-water interfaces can be tuned by ligand functionalization, with hydrophobic ligands yielding lower thermal interface conductance than hydrophilic ones. Altering the gold wettability approximates the effect of coating the gold surface with ligands of varying hydrophilicity.