For a new SDL application, we recommend that researchers tailor their choice of feasibility-aware acquisition function to the specific characteristics of their scientific problem and laboratory. Most importantly, researchers should first deduce how "inconvenient" constraint violations will be. The least inconvenient violations could be almost indistinguishable from objective measurements in terms of spent resources, time or risk. The most inconvenient violations might involve a significant resource, time or risk penalty, due to necessary instrument repair or recalibration or even the prepara-tion of dangerous substances. When constraint violation inconvenience is low, researchers are free to simply choose the optimization strategy expected to perform best. For moderate inconvenience, we recommend a strategy which balances risk-aversion and optimization performance, such as FCA-0.5 or FIA-1. For highly inconvenient constraint violations, we recommend choosing the FCA function with t set close to 0.8.