The same analysis for more molecules is shown in Figure . Here the basis set is fixed (AVTZ), but a more detailed analysis with different basis sets and additional molecules is given in Section S6 of the SI. In the case of acetylene molecule [panel (a)] the patterns are even clearer than it was the case with butadiene. Namely, GEO of LDA, PBE, BLYP and TPSS is almost entirely due to the errors in the triple bond length, whereas GEO of hybrids are almost entirely due to the single bonds. In the case of benzene [panel (b)], the picture is more nuanced: GEO of GGAs, LDA and TPSS is still mostly due the error in the single bond, but has a significant contribution from the errors in the unsaturated C-C bond lengths. By looking at the remaining two panels in Figure , the similar patterns can be observed: the angle contributions to GEO s is still small, GEO s of hybrids is dominated by a single bond component, whereas unsaturated bonds dominate GEO s of the PBE/BLYP/TPSS group. The -L Minnesota functionals (ones that make no use of exact exchange) behave differently: the GEO weights of MN15-L are similar to those of the PBE/TPSS/BLYP group, whereas the weights of M06-L and M11-L are more similar to those of hybrids. Of course, if the AVDZ basis is used instead, the trends change, as was described by the butadiene example (see Section S6 for the results for the other basis sets).