Naming errors can in part be mitigated through built-in DBMS functionalities but may persist, especially in JSON formats, due to flexible key-value naming. At the time of writing, the implementation of OFET-db uses some keywords borrowed from other large-scale materials database efforts (e.g., where applicable and available, citation/source keywords from MaterialsMine, process and material keywords from CRIPT, 53 etc.), but largely uses custom keywords that provide more specificity to descriptors relevant to the organic device fabrication domain (e.g., blade, spin, inkjet, dip, etc. to specify different classes of solution coating/deposition techniques). A full list of terms is available in the Supporting Information for the database implementation version described herein. Future design efforts will employ updated terminologies from shared community resources when available, as shared vocabularies promote consistent descriptions and interoperability. An experimental data entry template that incorporates this controlled vocabulary has also been adapted from a similar template shared by MaterialsMine. This template is intended to not only reduce the time and inconvenience that is inevitable for an experimentalist or domain expert to fill out a data record for database entry but provides a tool to reduce the error checking and validation workload on the back end. Future template versions could be implemented as user-friendly webforms, a web application, or directly coupled to electronic laboratory notebooks or integrated laboratory instrumentation to facilitate the process of database inserts for newly curated experimental records.