Looking at formation energies published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) indicates that our correction provides more accurate results in some cases where the two correction methods give very different corrected formation energies. For example, according to NIST, the formation energy of zirconium (IV) chloride is -1.6 eV/atom. According to our correction, the formation energy of the most stable zirconium (IV) chloride structure in the materials project or GNoME databases is -1.6 eV/atom, and with the standard correction, the value is -1.9 eV/atom. This provides some further evidence that our correction gives more accurate results. These findings are not isolated to the particular binary phase diagrams shown in figures 2 and 3. Figure shows that, for every binary composition for which there is data, switching from the standard correction method to the 110% PBE correction method always results in a decrease in the number of discovered materials.