In Figure , open light grey circles and dark grey bullets mark the shape of the response of the empty C-CSH and with 2.1 mg test crystallite loaded to the central capsule, respectively. Clearly, none of the scans resemble the typical shape of the SRF. The orange bullets represent the calculated point-by-point difference between these two scans yielding the sole contribution brought about by the insertion of the test sample. This shape exhibits a very clear correspondence to the signal expected for a diamagnetic substance, and the solid red line marks the fit of the SRF centered at the center of the scan window, i.e., where the whole assembly was centered. The match is exceptionally good and the z-shift of about 1 mm indicates the inaccuracy in alignments of the C-CSH assembly for these two measurements. The fit yields mSnTe = -9.64 emu. The corresponding magnitude of the magnetic susceptibility is marked by a yellow cross in Figure . This result corresponds to the ABS methods at its best. The corresponding magnetic moments m are given in the labels. Now we separately extract the magnetic moments from each of the two experimental scans given in Figure . They are plotted in Figures , together with the corresponding fits, marked as solid lines of matching colors. In the first case, Figure , the fit yields the residual moment of the empty C-CSH mC-CSH = +1.4 emu. In the second case, Figure , after insertion of the sample the fit yields mS = -8.25 emu. Obviously, at first glance, neither of the two fits can be classified as satisfactory. The fitted functions cut somewhat freely across the experimental points, taking rather little notice of the pattern formed by the experimental points. This is actually acceptable, as the fitting routine seeks the even-parity component, the SRF, and only these "frequencies" that correspond to z0 = 2 cm. It is therefore no surprise that the difference of the magnitudes of m returned by the fittings yields the correct magnitude of mSnTe = mS -mC-CSH = -9.65 emu, a mere 0.1% different value than established in Figure .