to construct an LMF, 100 exhibits similar valence features in even sharper form. The bonding region appears most important given the nature of the training data. The t-LMF is known to go to zero at the bond-critical point (BCP) 101 due to the vanishing density gradient included in τ W , while local maxima left and right of the BCP tend to develop upon bond stretching. The increase of these maxima for the t-LMF upon bond stretching, providing some compensation for exaggerated left-right correlation by semi-local functionals, has been connected to the good performance of t-LMF-based LHs for barriers (e.g., in comparison with s-LMFs). Given that the present n-LMF performs even much better for barriers, it is notable that in covalent bonds it actually produces more EXX admixture near the BCP. In heteronuclear bonds, the LMF seems to be larger near the less electronegative atom (Figures S2). The t-LMF degenerates to a constant in one-orbital regions, e.g., for the entire H 2 ground state or "behind" hydrogen atoms in X-H bonds (cf. Figure in Supporting Information). This has been discussed as a potential shortcoming of the t-LMF in different contexts. The present n-LMF shows interesting structure for such regions (Figure ), which may contribute to the improved behavior for many energy differences, in particular for atomization energies or barriers involving hydrogen atoms. We do indeed find a more pronounced improvement with LH24n-B95 compared to LH20t