Selected reflections corresponding to each of the three phases are shown in Figure . It can be clearly observed that the XRD-CT reflections reconstructed by FBP from both 180 and 360 °scans exhibit significant peak broadening artefacts. Additionally, the diffraction peaks generated by FBP with 180 °scan range exhibit peak shifting artefacts. In contrast, the diffraction peaks generated with 360 °scan range using FBP are in good alignment with the ones obtained by the ParallaxNet with 180 °scan range. This demonstrates that Parallax effectively reduces various artefacts brought about by parallax and also that it simply requires a 0-180 °scan range to reconstruct parallax artefact-free data. The Rietveld analysis of the reconstructed volumes further demonstrates the efficacy of our method. From the lattice parameter maps shown in Figure , it can be clearly seen that the lattice parameter maps from the ParallaxNet with 180 °scans have almost identical values with those from the maps of the FBP derived from the 360 °scan range. FBP images reconstructed using 360 °scan range should not exhibit any peak shifting, even when significant parallax artefacts are present; to clarify, the centroid position of the peaks will be in the correct position as if it were a dataset without parallax. As such, the lattice parameter maps of the ParallaxNet can be considered close to the ground truth. It is also worth mentioning that the ParallaxNet maps exhibit less noise compared to those from the FBP. The distribution of the lattice parameters is shown in histograms in Supplementary Figure .