In general, our observations are the same as when we compared to the Minnesota Solvation Database. First, there again does not appear to be a significant difference between the predictions wherein ∆G self i,i was predicted or computed using reference data. However, for the specific case of water as a solute, there is a noticeable difference. When ∆G self i,i was computed using reference vapor pressure data, ln γ ∞ i,j when water was a solute was under-predicted on average by 3.02, 3.68, and 2.84 with SM12, SM8, and SMD, respectively. For of theses cases, the value of ln γ ∞ i,j was always under-predicted except for water in tetrachloroethene with SMD. Additionally, we again notice an abrupt deviation in our trend for reference values of ln γ ∞ i,j greater than 9. As before, all of these highly non-ideal (unfavorable) systems, water was the solvent. Interestingly, the value of R 2 does increase. However, we are dealing with a larger data set that does contain duplicates.