In Fig. , we examine D3, D4, XDM, and MBD dispersion corrections for the L7 complexes, in comparison to SAPT+MBD values. The latter are taken to be benchmark dispersion energies, per the discussion in Section 3.1. As in smaller systems (Fig. ), but at greatly expanded scale in these larger systems (Fig. ), dispersion corrections for DFT are systematically smaller than true dispersion energies. This is expected, but the scale is noteworthy: more than 10 kcal/mol difference in some cases, underscoring that DFT dispersion corrections should not be equated with dispersion energies. Interestingly, BLYP+D3 is the lone functional (of those considered here) that bucks this trend, as its D3 correction is larger in magnitude than SAPT+MBD dispersion, in 5 of 7 cases, and is the largest among the DFT dispersion corrections in 6 of 7 cases. Other patterns emerge amongst the various dispersion-corrected methods, as seen from the very similar pattern of data points from one complex to the next, despite significant differences in the energy scale. The D4(BJ) correction for SCAN+D4 ranges from -2.5 to -23.1 kcal/mol for these systems and is off-scale in every case that appears in Fig. . This is notable given that SCAN+D4 performs reasonably well for the L7 complexes, with mean absolute errors of 1.4 kcal/mol versus LNO-CCSD(T)/CBS or 0.9 kcal/mol versus FN-DMC. This suggests that a significant amount of middle-range dispersion is captured by the semilocal SCAN functional.