Which reduces to ω Dhabal (r) for R cut = 0. For large cells, the Lorch-like damping might be most appropriate, as a very slow change in the RDF is less aggressive than a more abrupt cut provided by a smooth step function, but in other cases, where e.g. smaller cells have been sampled, it might in some cases be more important to avoid damping the local structure encoded at shorter r values in the RDF, than to enforce a smoothly changing damping window. See fig. for a comparison of the shapes of the functions. In the last two decades, much work has gone into developing corrections for the RDF that recovers the correct KBI . In this work, we will analyse our own correction-scheme based on the excluded volume, as well as the van der Vegt-and Herera-corrections, focusing on x-ray scattering. MD simulations and subsequent RDF sampling are often carried out in a "black box"-fashion as just one of many steps in a complex structural modeling strategy. Thus, we have limited ourselves to corrections that can be applied to RDFs sampled from MD simulations carried out in readily available and highly efficient MD codes, and RDFs sampled from already available codes, where no (cost-increasing or otherwise) modifications have to be implemented in either methodology in order to apply the correction.