However, shortcomings such as low energy density, circuitous microporosity, and the formation of non-graphitic carbon walls within Acs, contribute to large diffusion pathways coupled with high ionic resistance. This inadvertently impedes the simultaneous achievement of high energy density, and elevated power output . On the other side, pseudocapacitors operate by accumulating charge at the electrode surface through the formation of monolayer adsorption of metal ions or protons, fast surface/near-surface redox reactions, and the rapid ionic intercalation of ions into the adjacent-surface atomic layers . Pseudocapacitors have demonstrated an impressive charge storage capacity, surpassing EDLCs with carbon electrodes by factors ranging from ten-to-hundred. Yet, the major problems such as limited electrical conductivity, inadequate power density, poor electrochemical/mechanical stability, and a restricted operating voltage window limit their promising eventualities for future research on supercapacitors. In light of these dynamics, pseudocapacitors often function as an auxiliary reinforcement to enhance the system's energy density. Eventually, EDLCs (carbon electrodes) symbolize the indisputable choice for the development of supercapacitors due to their intriguing package of features such as multifaceted dimensions (ranging from 0D-3D), abundance in Earth's composition, expansive surface area to volume ratio, tunable porous structures, high electrical conductivity, facile functionalization. These traits collectively contribute to elevated EDL capacitance and cycling stability. Since the nanoscale charge separation or electrical double formation across the electrode-electrolyte interface leads to energy storage and release, the carbon-based supercapacitors provide accelerated chargedischarge cycles, ensuring sustained performance over extended durations .