Moreover, the scaling line between *OH and *OOH (Figure ) shifts down, making the intercept closer to the ideal value of 2.46. Thus, the new scaling is closer to the theoretical peak in the contour map (Figure ), suggesting a chance of finding a more active OER catalyst in M1N4-M2N4/G than MN4/G. Following the improvement of the scaling relationship between *OH and *OOH from MN4/G to M1N4-M2N4/G, we conducted a more comprehensive kinetics analysis based on energetic data of every step in OER process, to examine that if SCE enhanced M1N4-M2N4/G by *OH(M1) is potentially a better OER catalyst than MN4/G. The details of microkinetics calculations using the CatMAP software package have been provided in the supporting information. Since the contour map of M1N4-M2N4/G (Figure ) not only has more data points closer to the peak than MN4/G (Figure ) but also possesses a substantially larger area with noticeable OER activity, it is more likely to locate an efficient OER catalyst within M1N4-M2N4/G than MN4/G, thus supporting our hypothesis about the promotive SCE role of *OH(M1) on OER.