In practice, the above concerns proved unnecessary as the experiment was both simple and intuitive to setup and worked well largely owing to the reaction's innate insensitivity to air, current, and excess electricity. Thus, of the 24 substrates run in parallel on this device, 20 gave detectable amounts of product by HPLC/MS analysis. The functionality present across the successful entries of this screen cover a wide range of chemical space and allowed us to test various functional groups that were not explored in the prior scope study. With respect to the arene, several entries are worth noting. Thiazoles and benzothiazole (57, 66), an anisole derivative (58), sulfide bearing pyrimidines (59), a variety of 2-substituted pyridines (60, 61, 67), the nucleobase found in remdesivir (62), as well as a Bocprotected aniline (63) and fluorobenzene (64) ). Electron poor 2bromo-3-fluoro-6-chloropyridine coupled efficiently with 55 to afford 81 in 44% isolated yield (51% NMR yield). Inverting the electronics of the pyridine and coupling with 2-bromo-5-methoxypyridine gave pyran derivative 82 in 32% yield (34% NMR yield). Adding an ortho substituent was still tolerated and 83 was accessed in 28% yield (28% NMR yield) after coupling with 2-iodo-3-methylpyridine. On the other three positions of the carousel, a series of azaindole derivatives were accessed simultaneously. Pyrrolidine bearing 84 was synthesized in 46% isolated yield (57% NMR yield). Neopentyl substituted 85 was similarly accessed in 37% isolated yield (47% NMR yield). Finally, cyclopropyl substrate 86 represented an interesting opportunity to couple strained radicals using this chemistry. While this compound was detected in the ehive screen, it was low yielding in the preparative reaction giving 86 in only 5% isolated yield (11% NMR yield) and was found to readily decompose upon standing. Consistent with the above miniaturization in the e-hive, these couplings gave serviceable yields of product in this parallel preparative procedure.