The three Tully scattering models, including the simple avoided crossing (SAC), dual avoided crossing (DAC) and extended coupling with reflection (ECR) models, have been widely used to benchmark the performance of new nonadiabatic dynamics methods. Here, we systematically compare the new SC-CTSH method with FSSH, CTMQC and CTSH. The main differences between these investigated methods are listed in Table . We first study the time evolution of nuclear density distribution and quantum momentum in the ECR model. Then, we give an overall comparison of the channel populations for ECR and DAC models. In the SI, we give additional computational details and results for the SAC model (see Figure )