While there is overall little substantial change to the DFA ranking, we do notice a shift when comparing the best TDA-with the best TD-DFT methods. The six best approaches are now exclusively TDA-DHDFs with SCS/SOS and range-separation, namely SCS-ωB2GP-PLYP, SOS-ωB2PLYP, and SOS-ωB2GP-PLYP with MADs of 0.12 eV, followed by SOS-ωB88PP86, SOS-RSX-QIDH, and SOS-ωPBEPP86 with MADs of 0.14 eV. The first full TD-DFT method in our ranking is TD-B2GP-PLYP with an MAD of 0.14 eV but a slightly higher RMSD than the preceding three TDA-DHDFs. B3LYP remains to be the worst hybrid functional and four DHDFs are still worse, namely the TD and TDA versions of RSX-0DH and RSX-QIDH.