Below, we discuss the 43 materials (which includes the partial successes), going into detail in many cases, to highlight the consistencies of the errors described above. We group the materials by structure type for this discussion. For the analysis, the original published experimental XRD patterns were obtained by digitalizing the data provided in the A-lab paper supplementary information using GetData Graph Digitalizer. Because software had trouble identifying the green dots which represent observed XRD data, the experimental data was obtained by combining the calculated fit with the fit's residual. To align the x-axis values for combining, the acquired XY data were then interpolated the data in Origin. This process is certainly not ideal and yields data of lower quality than the original. Nevertheless, we found it was possible to carry out Rietveld refinement on these datasets. This was carried out in GSAS II, the software used by A-lab. We do not have the experimental parameters for the original data collection, and so peak profiles were determined empirically. We do not claim our fits are definitive or cannot be improved upon, but we highlight in each case the features that make us believe the fits we propose are superior to those provided in the original paper.