Johnson and co-workers recently published a comprehensive comparison of dispersion-corrected DFT methods (D3, D4, XDM, and MBD), using a database of 15,000 CCSD(T)/CBS noncovalent interaction energies, which is itself a subset of a larger database. Both neutral and ionic complexes were considered and results are presented in Fig. in the form of histograms of errors in total interaction energies. The key take-home message is that a variety of correction schemes (as applied to the PBE0 functional in this case) afford very consistent results.