More broadly, redissolution has a distinct impact on the ionic conductivity of Li3InCl6 with further variations observed in recycled samples, where the extent of deviation in ionic conductivity from that of the redissolution depends on the specific electrode materials from which Li3InCl6 was separated. Impedance spectroscopy data, supported by Rietveld analysis of XRD data (see Figure ), indicate that interactions between Li3InCl6 and electrode materials during recycling are generally disadvantageous, leading to the formation of undesirable phases, such as LiCl and other unidentified phases. The impact of these impurities on the ionic conductivity is shown in Table . A correlation between the concentrations of LiCl and impurity elements, as determined by ICP-MS analysis, and the measured ionic conductivity values is observed. contrast, recycled Li3InCl6, after separation from LCO, LMO, and C-LFP exhibits a reduction in ionic conductivity, likely due to the presence of impurity phases, as revealed from Rietveld analysis of XRD data, and the incorporation of transition metal elements from the electrodes, as evidenced by ICP-MS analysis. The most pronounced decline in ionic conductivity is observed for nickel-rich electrode materials (e.g., NMC and NCA). This substantial decrease in ionic conductivity is likely attributable to a combination of impurity phases, compositional alterations, and changes in morphology or microstructure, particularly due to the agglomeration of particles within the recycled material.