As Pulido et al. have previously studied the energetic ordering of different fluoride sites in some of the zeolites included in the present work (IFR, STF, and STT), it is useful to point out the differences between their work and the approach employed here: First, Pulido et al. used empirical force field calculations, rather than dispersion-corrected DFT. Second, their models included only a single fluoride anion per unit cell, not accounting for the relatively high concentration of fluoride in real zeolites (where they are required to balance the charge of the OSDAs). Third, the calculations comparing different fluoride locations within one cage were performed for OSDA-free models, neglecting the role of F-OSDA interactions. The more recent DFT study by Luo et al. revealed rather dramatic differences between the energetic ordering obtained for zeolite models with and without OSDA cations, implying that it is necessary to include the OSDA in order to make meaningful predictions.