As indicated in Table , sufficient data is available for technologies 1A, 1C, 2A, and 2C to conduct a harmonized TEA, for which the results are presented in Figure and Figure . . Technology 2A is also the only technology that currently has the potential to cost below USD100/tCO 2 , but values can reach up to USD300/tCO 2 . In addition, the cost values for net removed CO 2 are found to be 19% to 48% higher. For Technology 1C, regardless of the configuration, the emissions from the DAC process in the US context would be larger than the captured CO 2 , resulting in a net increase of CO 2 emissions instead of a reduction (no diamonds for Technology 1C in Figure ).