The code successfully achieved the initial target size of 180 nm after 32 iterations. However, upon repeating the experiment, this measurement appeared as an outlier, with a deviation far exceeding the size tolerance of 5 %. Moreover, these target sizes surpassed the intended physical targets for the polymer, resulting in inefficient performance by the algorithm. Notably, the algorithm failed to reach the second target size of 150 nm even after 115 runs, prompting the termination of the experiment. This highlights the code's efficiency only within the regime of sizes permissible by the polymer. Additionally, the significant fluctuations in sizes across runs suggest a regime of instability lacking a discernible trend.