The total delivered electricity price at the high-power charger is 0.15 USD/kWh, 0.32 USD/kWh, 0.48 USD/kWh for the optimistic, baseline, and pessimistic scenarios, respectively. The baseline cost computed using our bottom-up estimation method is similar to charging costs reported by Teichert et al. , which were based on commercial prices and price caps enforced in the German markets via governmental regulations. The optimistic scenario features high asset utilization rates (a truck completely recharges each night), and the low end of estimated demand charges and charger equipment prices; thus the energy charge is the major contributor (70%) to the total cost. On the other hand, we see a roughly equal contribution from the demand charge (37%), energy charge (34%), and capital cost (28%) for the pessimistic scenario that assumes that a charger is occupied for only 10 days in a month. Another important takeaway is the non-negligible contribution of the demand charge, even for a 150 kW rated charger. Given how demand charge scales with power rating, it is clear that ultra-high-power chargers (1 MW) discussed in the literature for trucks would lead to significantly higher electricity prices unless they were utilized many hours each day. Therefore, the economic benefits of the overnight charging scheme assumed here is evident.