In addition to global benchmarking metrics, which can mask errors for niche chemistries, granular benchmarking in the form of parameter-wise, or chemistry-wise, analyses helped capture some such areas where there is room for further improvement. Analyzing such poor performers, we found that Sage 2.0.0 has a pathology in describing angles of sulfonamides with heteroatom neighbors, as well as slightly elongated bonds between sulfur and amide, or sulfur and double-bonded nitrogens. Another issue is with puckering of small fused rings resulting in geometry deviations near bridgehead atoms; we also see an inability to capture the effects of pyridine lone pairs on condensed phase energetics. We plan to address these errors in subsequent refits in the near term.