As indicated in Fig. , the SEM captured the microscale of the post-testing environments of the 8unit vs 16-unit case. The 8-unit case is known to be the naturally occurring support in materials, through which vertical "supports" work to upholster the material. However, we observe here how there was a dramatic failure in the specimen. Compared to the 16-unit case, which stayed intact at the 2 Hz eigenfrequency, the 8-unit case showcases the separation of layers within the 3D space. Not only is there segmentation of the layers, but the process of delamination of the fibrous layers is also present, indicating the additive manufacturing implications of ISMER. Because of this, adhesive agents such as (3-GLYCIDOXYPROPYL) TRIMETHOXYSILANE may be utilized in the manufacturing process of ISMER at the large scale to include the betterment of the adhesive layer between the layers to prevent such premature failure. In the 16-unit case, we see sustainment through the 2 Hz eigenfrequency attenuation. However, notice the defects present in the sample, further indicating how the additive manufacturing process must be refined to produce reliable prototypes and production of ISMER. In Fig. , the delamination of fiber layers of the 8-unit sample at 8 Hz is observed. Even at the 8 Hz frequency, the structure struggles to prevent failure at the interface when faced with low-magnitude earthquakes. This holds importance in realizing that the 8-unit case is the naturally occurring vertical substrate often utilized in many micro-architectural frameworks. It should be noted that this represents a 3D-printed version, meaning that the results cannot be generalized to wood and steel vertical supports.