Meanwhile, thermodynamic sensitivity analysis (Figure ) shows that the sensitivity of CH 4 conversion with respect to the enthalpy of each adsorbate is quite di↵erent between the models with and without BMA. Conversion is much more sensitive to changes in the enthalpy of CH 4 ⇤ with the base BMA-CMPO model than with the base CMPO model at C/O= 1.0, and the most sensitive species is shifted from CH⇤ to H⇤ after the rate type is converted. In addition, increasing the enthalpy of adsorbed CO 2 ⇤ decreases the conversion of CH 4 with Arrhenius rates, while it increases conversion with BMA rates. The similar sensitivity value shifts can be seen for the synthesis gas yield and full oxidation thermodynamic sensitivity analysis in Figure . The thermodynamic sensitivity analysis shows that the Arrhenius to BMA rate type modification can change the sensitivity of descriptors to species' enthalpies and could even lead to an opposite correlation between a descriptor and a species enthalpy. During the sensitivity analysis, the enthalpy of species was perturbed by 0.05 eV, subsequently impacting the enthalpy of reactions involving these species. Notably, in the CMPO-BMA model, the forward reaction barriers are enthalpy-dependent, while in the CMPO model they remain una↵ected. Thus, this di↵erence led to a discrepancy in the thermodynamic sensitivity analyses as shown in Equation .