We separate the discussion of our results into five brief sections. First, we analyze the differences between the use of TD-and TDA-DFT for the functionals tested. Then, we look at the effects of range-separation and the impact of spin-component/spin-opposite scaling on DHDFs. Following that, we compare DHDFs SOS-ωB2PLYP 20 B2GP-PLYP ωB2GP-PLYP 18 SCS-B2GP-PLYP 20 SCS-ωB2GP-PLYP SOS-B2GP-PLYP 20 SOS-ωB2GP-PLYP 20 PBE0-DH RSX-0DH 62 PBE-QIDH RSX-QIDH 64 SCS-PBE-QIDH SCS-RSX-QIDH 20 SOS-PBE-QIDH SOS-PBE-QIDH 20 ωB88PP86 20 SCS-ωB88PP86 20 SOS-ωB88PP86 20 ωPBEPP86 20 SCS-ωPBEPP86 20 SOS-ωPBEPP86 against conventional hybrids and comment on the robustness of particular functionals. Those first four sections comprise our results for all 45 excitations. The discussion then concludes with a second analysis that excludes 4 states due to high double excitation or multi-reference character. Throughout our discussion, a deviation is defined as the difference between the DFA and reference value, which means that negative deviations and mean deviations (MDs) stand for underestimated excitation energies. Individual excitations for each DFA as well as all statistical metrics-including root mean square deviations (RMSDs), minimum and maximum deviations, and deviation spans-are available in the Supporting Information (SI).