However, various catastrophic events evidenced that not only are there triggering relationships between hazards but there are also amplified and influential relationships . One of the toughest challenges in multi-hazard studies is analyzing the mutually amplified phenomena between various hazards . This has driven the development of multi-hazard related research, and several scholars have done reviews related to multi-hazard interrelations. Kappes et al. adopted the term "multi-hazard" to describe the phenomenon of several natural hazards occurring simultaneously in a specific region. An outline of the challenges each step of a multihazard analysis poses was proposed, and the importance of the interrelations between hazards was emphasized. Liu et al. developed a systemic hazard interaction analysis based on the hazard-forming environment, and four types of hazard interrelations were defined: Independent, Mutex, Parallel, and Series. Tilloy et al. constructed a review of 146 references to identify modeling methods to quantify natural hazard interrelations, resulting in a better understanding of quantification methodologies for natural hazard interrelations. The hazard interrelations between 14 different natural hazards were divided into 5 types: Triggering, Change Condition, Compound, Independence, and Mutually Exclusive.