The results in Fig ) show systematic but weak dependence of T 1 on micelle sizes, while T 2 and hetNOE spin relaxation times from differently sized micelles are mostly within the error bars. Based on these results, we ran three independent simulations of each peptide except GWALP with 50 SDS molecules for at least 3 µs each. Spin relaxation times from these simulations were close to experimental values with the exception of eElaB(TA) for which T 1 was slightly overestimated and T 2 slightly underestimated (Fig. ). Therefore, eElaB(TA) simulations were repeated also in micelles with 40 SDS molecules, which indeed gave T 1 and T 2 values significantly closer to experiments, see Figure ).