4 major data points are analyzed and discussed: Stress, Energy, Force, Frequency attenuation, and the maximum earthquake magnitude until failure. These data points will help decide which type of material configuration is best for seismic activity prevention . Additionally, it was observed that many of the structures underwent a unique process of deformation, known as necking . Necking refers to a reduction in the cross-sectional area of a material, typically at a specific point along its length, under tensile loading . In this case, as the structures were compressed due to the combination of shear and compressive forces of the earthquake, the structures began to buckle and collapse at their center, leading to a significant reduction in the cross-sectional area. This phenomenon is often associated with localized yielding and can have a major impact on the mechanical behavior of the material. Furthermore, the analysis revealed that the distribution of the stress and strain was not uniform throughout the structure. Instead, it was found that the stress was highest at the center, and gradually decreased towards the edges. This is because the material at the center was subjected to a higher load, due to the presence of the aforementioned sinusoidal displacement. In turn, this led to a higher strain, which increased the stress further, leading to a feedback loop of sorts.