Both (ii) and (iii) were extensively demonstrated by them and other groups using adhesive measurements, a devoted experimental set up to follow the solvent evaporation through fluorescent measurements and by the development of a three-stage drying process, upon others. On the one side, binder migration is today widely accepted by the battery community and it was previously observed through energy dispersive X-ray, Raman and Real-time fluorescent spectroscopy. On the other side, the observation of light conductive additives migration is hampered by the presence of carbon in both binder and conductive phase, but it is supported by previous experimental observations for both LIBs cathodes and anodes. The main reason of migration seems to be convective and capillary forces developed during drying, while diffusion tend to re-homogenize the system. Fast drying and additive migration is typically detrimental for the final electrochemical performance and battery cycle life, promoting electrode cracking (particularly severe for the case of thick electrodes and water processing), poorly interconnected heterogeneous electrode mesostructures and poor adhesion to the current collector. From a computational perspective, the physical complexity of solvent evaporation in high SC dispersions makes challenging the development of devoted physics-based models. Most of the approaches used today for LIB slurry evaporation relies on 1-dimensional continuum models or 2-dimensional discrete models. However, it was previously demonstrated by us and others the potential of 3-dimensional (3D) models explicitly considering the carbon-binder domain (CBD) phase together with the active material (AM) one, calling for 3D discrete evaporation models devoted to the case of LIBs.