show intermediate transition times between these two. The latter means that the AM particles had ~27% more time to sediment when dried at the lowest DR with respect to the highest one, leading to higher concentration of this phase in the first part of the electrode. Concerning the pore phase (Figure ), it follows approximately the reverse trend respect the case of AM, indicating that the bulk porosity of the electrode is mainly controlled by the biggest particles' location. Besides the distribution of the AM, CBD and pore phase along the electrodes thickness, interfaces between the different phases is a key characteristic for electrochemical performance. Figure shows that the procedure employed along this work was capable of keeping substantially constant the percentage of AM surface in contact with both CBD and pores as well as the percentage of CBD surface in contact with the pore phase. The latter indicates that the application of different DRs, through the computational procedure proposed here, selectively affects the different phases' distribution (Figure and 3 A and B), while the surface percentages are rather controlled by the FFs parameters' value used (here kept constant for the different structures).