Currently used techniques are for example, Limiting Oxygen Index (LOI) tests that is performed according to ISO 4589 and ASTM D2863 standards, where the samples are burned in a candlelight manner under a controlled atmosphere of oxygen and nitrogen, and the minimum concentration of oxygen required for continued burning is measured and defined as LOI. Higher the LOI value is better is the flame resistance property. Another test that is commonly used for the quality control of flame retardancy of all the industrial materials is the Underwriter Laboratories (UL) UL94V test for vertical burning according to ASTM D3801 standard, where the sample is ignited several times by a premixed small burner flame in the vertical position enveloping the bottom of sample, heating simultaneously the sides, edges and corners and the burning time is measured. Cone calorimeter (CC) is used to measure the combustion properties, following the ISO 5660-1 and ASTM E1354 standards and employing the oxygen consumption method. The CC method is generally used to determine time of ignition, mass loss rate (MLR), heat release rate (ARHE, MARHE), average effective heat of combustion (Av EHC), total heat release (THR), total smoke release (TSP), total smoke release (TSP), smoke production rate (SPR), peak heat release rate (PHRR), total carbon monoxide production (TCOP), average carbon monoxide yield (Av-COY) and residual mass after burning. The burning degree of volatiles is determined from Av-EHC and can be used to investigate the flame-suppressing mechanism in the gas phase. Experimental methods for cone calorimetry and UL 94 tests used to describe fire behaviour were described by Xu . Additionally, they described the combustion process of polymeric materials for selecting flame retardants to reduce the amount of flammable volatiles emitted during combustion. He also discussed the smoke formation during fire and how it could affect the environment and human's health. Morgan et al reported the use of CC for a large number of thermoplastic materials and compared the results with UL-94V ratings. He could show some correlations between the UL-94 V rating and some of the cone calorimeter measurements, such as peak heat release rate (HRR) average and HRR at 60 s, but no correlations with other parameters such as time to ignition and total heat release. Significant differences in the flame-retardant mechanism and polymer fuel energy values were shown to be the reasons for not finding a precise correlation.