From fig. it is quite apparent that the reparameterized Arrhenius equation significantly outperforms the standard one not only in terms of overall loss but also in interpretability of the recovered results: Figure shows that, while the standard formulation correctly discovers activation energies, E A , only for larger temperature ranges, ∆T , the reparameterized formulation yields good agreement over all but the smallest temperature ranges (∆T < 0.1 K). Figure in contrast supports the overall reparameterization idea of referring the constants to a reference state: The rate constant at reference conditions, k + S,ref , is inherently always identified using eq. ( ) as can be seen from the constant and near ideal course. The difference between their values obtained by the reparameterized and the standard expression is particularly striking. For a detailed discussion of the results for the eq. ( ) parameterization, the reader is referred to appendix SI D. These results suggest to use the parameterization according to eq. ( ) and show that this way, robust discovery of activation energies is feasible over experimentally relevant temperature ranges.