For all three datasets, this new approach accurately reconstructed the peak positions using only a 0-180 °angular range, eliminating the need for a 0-360 °scan which halves the required acquisition time (i.e. half the number of projections). Furthermore, the reconstructed peaks were sharper and narrower than those produced by traditional FBP methods, both with 180 and 360 °scans. It should also be noted that in this work it was also shown that simply using a 360 °scan approach as a means to remove parallax artefacts is insufficient and should be avoided as it leads to peaks with shapes that cannot be modeled with a single profile (e.g. Gaussian peak). This was clearly demonstrated with the experimental XRD-CT presented in this work, an example being the Cu component in the cylindrical Li-ion battery. ParallaxNet overcomes the peak shape problems associated with the 0-360 °scan approach and also presents distinct advantages over the previously developed DLSR methodology, which is to the best of our knowledge the only alternative solution to removing parallax artefacts in XRD-CT data, addressing several inherent limitations: