It is as if QTAIM's sole purpose is to provide quantum-mechanically rigorous weights to keep the hard-won models and theories of chemistry from floating away. This is certainly a noble cause, but also one that results at times in 𝜌's features being "dumbed down" to match the conceptual simplicity of their chemical counterparts. The infinite geometric richness of atomic basin surfaces, for example, plays second fiddle to the scalar quantity of atomic basin energy, even though the latter is determined in part by the former. In our research, we were "tying down" bonds, and in the process necessarily discovered the bond bundle surface for which there is no chemical analog. The motions of these surfaces appear to be crucial to the making and breaking of bonds and cannot be lost by forcing the bond bundle through a "bond"shaped hole. So, for the first time, chemistry will have to borrow concepts from QTAIM rather than the other way around. And hence, we really are moving beyond QTAIM.