Figure showcases a performance profiling comparison between TORO and XGandalf. This comparison emphasizes distinct variations in performance for both the Lysozyme and CXI ID 83 datasets. Intriguingly, TORO RT, which is optimized for speed, either equates or excels over XGandalf, underscoring its efficiency. Figure offers further insights with an in-depth analysis of TORO's computational performance. The upper panel elucidates the interplay between average execution time and the number of strong reflections (with fixed batch size). The lower panel shows the significant influence of batch size on performance. A larger batch size allows for more data points to be processed simultaneously, leveraging the GPU's capability to handle multiple operations in parallel, maximizing its throughput.