Subsequently, the enantioselectivity of each catalyst with 13 model substrates was experimentally evaluated. 13 different models, one for each substrate, were developed. To find a general catalyst, a technique termed 'catalyst selection by committee' (CSC) was employed: for each substrate, all in-silico catalysts were evaluated and catalysts in the most enantioselective 1% received one 'vote'. After this process was performed for each of the 13 model substrates, catalysts with more votes were termed as being more general, balancing high enantioselectivity with a broader substrate scope. CSC enabled the identification of two well-performing, general catalysts.