The q-Gaussian functions can imitate the Voigt convolutions, but they are different functions, in particular for what is regarding the behavior of the wings. So let us stress once more that, as told by , the Voigt function "looks like Gaussian for small x (i.e., near line center), and like Lorentzian for large x (i.e., out in line wings)". We can also appreciate the same by observing the pseudo-Voigt function, which is generally used for approximating the Voigt function. Being the pseudo-Voigt the linear combination of Gaussian and Lorentzian functions, the wings must be necessarily Lorentzian and the kernel Gaussian-like. Consequently, if we use Voigt functions or pseudo-Voigt functions for fitting spectra, the wings of the Raman lines will be always described by a Lorentzian behavior. However, is this always the experimental case? That is, are we always observing Lorentzian wings for the Raman bands? To answer these questions, we started investigation in ChemRxiv1. We observed that a generalization of the pseudo-Voigt functions obtained by means of a linear combination of two q-Gaussians can help us in describing the leading term of the line wings. In this manner, we can quantitatively measure the wing power law as well as answering qualitatively whether it is Lorentzian or not. The q-Gaussians are therefore the proper solution for investigation. Actually, for the spectra previously considered , the fitted functions are successfully in several cases, for instance graphite, ChemRxiv2, anatase ChemRxiv3, SERS spectra, ChemRxiv4, and so on, For what is regarding the physics of Voigt function, let us consider the convolution theorem. This theorem states that the Fourier transform of a convolution is the product of the Fourier transforms of the convoluted functions. It means that the two related phenomena must have probability distributions which are independent (see discussion in . In the case of the Voigt convolution, the two distributions are those that we can find discussed for photonic emission in . They are the exponential decay and the Gaussian time functions, so that a spectral Lorentzian function is generally assumed as describing the photonic emission of the material (or the broadening due to photonic interactions with phonons), and a spectral Gaussian function is considered to represent the thermal effects (or the effects of instrumentation).