Moreover, if we have an incorrect long-range behaviour of the one-particle density, then the region close to the nucleus will also suffer because of charge conservation. As a result, properties like electric-field gradients (EFGs) are not so well described by currently available DFAs -the worst results are perhaps obtained for the late transition metals. To illustrate, the Cu EFG in CuF at the experimental bond distance is measured to be (in atomic units) -0.31 (2), while some representative DFAs give +0.495 (LDA), +0.444 (PW91), and +0.146 (B3LYP). At the coupledcluster CCSD(T) level, we have -0.439 (-0.341 if relativistic effects are included). To address this problem, the parameters in the CAMB3LYP functional can be tailored such that accurate results for EFG (and other short-range properties) are produced, 272 but this is not a nice solution and no unique functional exists that performs well for all properties concerned. One should also mention that, as for molecules, 273 the performance of various DFAs for the solid state has been extensively analysed in the past -see, for example, refs. 274-276. Here, a few percent error range is typical for solid-state properties such as lattice constants, cohesive energies and bulk moduli if (for the heavier elements) relativistic effects and (for the lighter elements) phonon contributions are included. For finite temperatures, thermal effects need to be included as well.