Figure shows the averaged data for each quantity and each measurement in the sequence, in which they were retrieved from the server. This sequence does not necessarily correspond to the order, in which the experiments were performed or requested. Therefore, it is not possible to draw any conclusions regarding the effectivity of the optimization. The demonstration revealed some shortcomings in the current status of the development of the agents. In the experimental setup, cross-contaminations resulted in the mixing ratios not matching with the calculated ones as accurately as expected. Further, it is possible that the simulation agent reaches boundaries regarding the composition when the mole fraction of the salt exceeds 50 %. Also, our results show a strong correlation between the viscosity and density in the system under investigation as shown in Figure . This renders minimum density and maximum viscosity a non-ideal target for optimization in this formulation space. The chemical space covered during the run is shown in Figure . The squared markers represent experimentally measured data, triangles indicate results obtained from simulations. The round markers with blue outlines represent requested formulations. A significant deviation between the formulations targeted in the experiments and the formulations requested by the optimizer can be observed. This most probably depends on the stock solutions, which do not allow to cover the full chemical space spanned by the individual chemicals. Furthermore, the approximation required during the transition from mole fractions to volume fractions and back during the experiment adds another source for the deviation.