First, the associated experimental papers were collected for all the selected MOFs under study. Among them, there were two papers not in English (in Chinese and German languages, with the codenames: AVEHAM and KABNIL, receptively), so they were excluded. Next, all the acquired papers were proof read to identify the activation status (activated or collapsed), activation methods (direct activation, solvent-exchange, freeze-drying, or supercritical CO2 activation), and the last solvent used (acetone, dichloromethane, methanol, etc.). Researchers often describe the failed activation events using some words like "collapse" or "amorphous"; however, it is not advisable to merely rely on these keywords when searching for the activation status. Hence, when the "collapse" keyword was used for mining the activation status, it returned many results, but in many occasions, it was used in the contest of describing the thermal degradation during thermogravimetric analysis (TGA).