Ebenstein, mitigates adhesion effects between the nanoindenter tip and the sample, which can otherwise lead to significant overestimation of the modulus when analyzed using traditional models like OP, as seen on the first step. Using this approach, the reduced modulus determined was 2.07 ± 0.05 MPa for ink with the JKR model. These findings emphasize the critical importance of using a conospherical tip instead of a Berkovich tip and accounting for adhesion effects at the tip-sample interface to ensure reliable modulus determination of microscale 3D printed elastomers.