In Figs. S3-10 in the Supporting Information, we show the applicability of this method towards many other intergrowths, including known disordered structures such as SBS/SBT, FAU/EMT, MEL/MFI, ITH/ITR, RTH/ITE, and ERI/OFF. In cases such as MEL/MFI or RTH/ITE (Figs. ), the difficulty in distinguishing between phase boundaries may explain why these phases are typically found as intergrowths even when a single OSDA is used. As the shapes of the cavities are very similar, bi-selectivity is more easily achieved compared to other intergrowths. In other cases such as FAU/EMT, ITH/ITR, ERI/OFF, AFS/BPH (Figs. ), the shape boundaries are more subtle, and often dominated by one of the end members. This suggests that balancing phase competition between the polymorphs could require tuning other synthesis conditions in addition to the OSDA. This is also the case of SBS/SBT (Fig. ), whose intergrowth can be tuned beyond the use of bi-selective ISV Energy (kJ/mol Si) OSDAs by selecting inorganic structure-directing agents that cooperate to crystallize the disordered structure. Finally, OSDAs for realizing the hypothetical intergrowth AEI/SAV (Fig. ) is proposed. Whereas SAV is typically synthesized as a zeotype, synthesizing an aluminosilicate SAV framework intergrown with SSZ-39 (AEI framework) may be interesting for catalytic applications such as NO x -SCR beyond pure AEI or CHA/AEI intergrowths.