The findings presented above can be generalized. In the Qualitative Theory section, we argued that in an n,* state there is a tug-ofwar between the antiaromatic -component and the aromatic -component. Is there support for this hypothesis when considering all investigated molecules? We also discussed the potential correlation between the excitation energy and the (anti)aromatic character of the residual, but pointed out factors unrelated to (anti)aromaticity that also affect excitation energies. Still, is the hypothesis valid for a limited set of compounds, e.g., substituted derivatives of a certain heteroaromatic? Figures and revealed that heteroaromatics with n,* states with aromatic residuals often have these states as T1 or S1 states. Yet, is there a connection to the (anti)aromaticity of the residual of the n,* state and the energy difference between the lowest n,* and ,* states? We further test if the knowledge gained on the (anti)aromatic character of the n,* state can be expanded to other species that are not traditionally seen as heteroaromatics. Finally, we address molecules and features that tentatively can be useful for applications.