While both the forward and reverse directions of a reaction can be promoted dynamically, the strategies for selecting the parameters of the imposed surface binding energy oscillation between systems are indeed different. For the low gamma system (γ B-A ~ 0.5) depicted in Figure , the Sabatier curve is depicted in black with extended dashed lines above the Sabatier peak. The oscillation amplitude is depicted as a red bar with two endpoints: (i) the strong binding energy maximum is located at the position of the volcano peak, and (ii) the weak binding energy minimum is permitted to vary. The average turnover frequency to B is depicted in the heatmap of Figure with variable square wave surface frequency and tunable The significance of transitioning between a surface covered in reaction surface species and a clean surface for low gamma systems under dynamic conditions has implications for selection of catalyst materials. In general, the binding energies of A* and B* need to be sufficiently weak that all chemical species can be desorbed during the weaker of the surface oscillation states; in this case δ ~ 1.4 eV exhibited this capability. However, as the binding energy of B* varied with the imposed surface oscillation, a new limitation exists; the heat of adsorption of both B* and A* must be less than or equal to zero. For low gamma systems, small variations in the binding energy of B* produce large variations in the binding energy of A* such that it readily approaches zero enthalpy of adsorption. This scenario can be interpreted by the gammadelta plot of Figure ; as binding energies weaken; one surface species achieve negligible adsorption enthalpy before the other one. In this scenario, the surface species with negligible adsorption enthalpy will remain in that state as the other surface species continues to change with the imposed oscillation.