Here, separate samples of enantiopure S and racemic TLA were first subjected to the accelerated sublimation (flow of 1.5 L/min) for 120 minutes. Both showed a linear evolution of the sublimate, but their evolution rate differed significantly (Figure ). Second, to observe the behavior of systems that were neither enantiopure nor racemic, three scalemic mixtures of (S)-TLA with 90% ee, 60% ee, and 30% ee were prepared by weighting (S)-TLA and rac-TLA powders directly in the milling jar. Those were then subjected to the same conditions of accelerated sublimation. As depicted in Figure , the sublimation rate was inversely proportional to the initial enantiomeric excess of the scalemic sample and, to our surprise, all sublimated scalemates led to a linear evolution of the sublimate. The SDE by sublimation is generally explained by the existence of a well-defined ratio of the two enantiomers that sublimates preferentially over all other compositions (including racemic and enantiopure). However, the details of this phenomenon vary from case to case, and it is well possible that a chiral eutectic are involved, or, for example, that homochiral clusters pass to the gaseous state together with single molecules of the opposite enantiomer. Whatever the reason was here, our expectation was that a fast initial transition to the gaseous state of the composition led to a sublimation of TLA at the same rate for each scalemic mixture, and that this rate then progressively slowed down due to the enantioenrichment of the residue in the jar. Here, however, under our forcedly accelerated sublimation conditions, the sublimation rate appeared to solely depend on the initial vapor pressure of the chosen scalemic mixture. It remained linear without varying during the 120 minutes of the analysis (Figure ), until a gradual rate deceleration occurred due to approaching the complete consumption of the sample (Figure ). For getting more insight into the process, the sublimation experiment with a scalemic mixture of TLA with 60% ee was repeated, but this time with a stop of both the grinding and the gas flow after 60 minutes. Then, after a break of 20 minutes the sublimation was continued for an additional ca. 50 minutes (Figure ). Now, two different linear sublimation rates for the two phases of the experiment were defined, with the first being expectedly faster than the second one, thus suggesting that under conditions of accelerated sublimation the mixture responded by maintaining the vapor pressure present at the starting point.