Finally, we investigate the principle of Analogy using the Socratic prompt: "What alternative analogies might explain other aspects of the concept of electrodeposition, beyond electrochemistry?" This prompt explicitly directs the model to search for cross-disciplinary comparisons, leading to responses that describe electrodeposition using real-world analogies, such as painting with a spray gun, magnetic attraction, and sandcastle formation, which emphasize different aspects of ion transport, adhesion, and structured deposition. These analogies allow for a more accessible explanation of electrodeposition, particularly for audiences unfamiliar with electrochemical concepts. In contrast, the non-Socratic prompt, "Explain the concept of electrodeposition beyond electrochemistry concepts," generates a response that discusses industrial applications, materials science perspectives, and process control factors, but does not explicitly use analogies as a reasoning tool to bridge unfamiliar concepts with established knowledge. While both responses convey meaningful insights, the Socratic Analogy prompt encourages the model to reframe and contextualize knowledge, making the explanation adaptable to varied scientific and educational contexts, whereas the non-Socratic prompt remains within a descriptive framework that lacks explicit knowledge transfer through comparative reasoning. This illustrates how Analogy-based Socratic prompting enhances conceptual accessibility, allowing for deeper engagement and intuitive understanding of electrodeposition across different fields.