Interestingly, the high level of nanotechnological research cannot ensure the intensive development of nanotoxicology. For example, significant and consistent growth in nanotechnology papers is noted in the three countries. Between 2000 and 2007, the average annual growth rate was +31.43% in China, +11.88% in Russia, and +33.51% in India . Despite Russia's high indicators, it does not appear among the leading countries of any rating. Further scientometric research should be aimed not only at studying the leading countries of nanotoxicology but also at assessing the mistakes of countries that could not realize nanotechnological research's potential. This may allow for a better assessment of the infrastructure features required for successful interdisciplinary research.