Comparing torsions between experimental geometries from COD and lowest-energy gasphase conformers from CREST/GFN2 is intended to show the suitability of gas-phase torsion preferences to replace or supplement standard crystallographic analysis. Poor correlation between individual torsion distributions could occur for a few main reasons -that the gas phase and experimental crystal structures show distinct angles due to intermolecular interactions and packing effects, that the distributions have few points and are thus inherently noisy, or that the GFN2 semiempirical method is not sufficiently accurate to reproduce torsion angles. However, the COD is significantly smaller than the Cambridge Crystallographic Database,, which limits the number of torsion data points for some structural motifs. Expanding our analysis to include millions of molecules can improve the understanding of uncommon motifs, as well as potential torsional preference differences in the solid state, compared to the gasphase geometries. This work will examine the comparison of crystal structure and calculated gas-phase torsional preferences for both ring and acyclic containing torsions.