While the experimentally obtained results expose a similar trend as predicted by the numerical simulations, the superiority regarding streaming size of L = 500 µm is less pronounced in experiments, therefore further investigations might be necessary to allow for the appropriate interpretation of these results. A non-negligible reason for the variation observed between the numerically determined results and the experimental quantifications might also be based on differences in the evaluated quantity. While the numerical simulations allow for a direct investigation of the streaming velocity of the produced out-of-plane streaming near the embedded microbubble, due to limited accessibility to this streaming during experimental evaluations, the latter has to rely on the generated in-plane vortices. Therefore, the comparison of the results obtained through the different techniques, i.e., numerical and experimental evaluations, might be restricted by the complex and possibly non-linear relationship between the out-of-plane and the in-plane streaming vortices.