〈𝑞 B 〉 plot will be indicative of electrofreezing. The 〈𝑞 @ 〉 vs. 〈𝑞 B 〉 results for the no field case, and the 0.6 V/nm electric field intensity, are plotted in figure . The distributions are broad and diffuse due to the high temperature at which the simulations were performed in this work. This would render the labeling of individual particles as ice or liquid based off 〈𝑞 @ 〉 or 〈𝑞 B 〉 alone impossible at these temperatures, as the 〈𝑞 @ 〉 vs. 〈𝑞 B 〉 distributions will likely overlap for ice and water molecules. However, the location and density of data points can still be compared between the no field and electric field simulations through visual inspection to glean whether any change due to ice formation is present. Similar to the RDF results, figure shows the electric field results in no discernable variation in the 〈𝑞 @ 〉 vs. 〈𝑞 B 〉 plot for any of the glycine polymorph systems.