On the Intertranslatability of Argumentation Semantics
  Translations between different nonmonotonic formalisms always have been an
important topic in the field, in particular to understand the
knowledge-representation capabilities those formalisms offer. We provide such
an investigation in terms of different semantics proposed for abstract
argumentation frameworks, a nonmonotonic yet simple formalism which received
increasing interest within the last decade. Although the properties of these
different semantics are nowadays well understood, there are no explicit results
about intertranslatability. We provide such translations wrt. different
properties and also give a few novel complexity results which underlie some
negative results.
