Revisiting Chase Termination for Existential Rules and their Extension
  to Nonmonotonic Negation
  Existential rules have been proposed for representing ontological knowledge,
specifically in the context of Ontology- Based Data Access. Entailment with
existential rules is undecidable. We focus in this paper on conditions that
ensure the termination of a breadth-first forward chaining algorithm known as
the chase. Several variants of the chase have been proposed. In the first part
of this paper, we propose a new tool that allows to extend existing acyclicity
conditions ensuring chase termination, while keeping good complexity
properties. In the second part, we study the extension to existential rules
with nonmonotonic negation under stable model semantics, discuss the relevancy
of the chase variants for these rules and further extend acyclicity results
obtained in the positive case.
