Learning When Training Data are Costly: The Effect of Class Distribution
  on Tree Induction
  For large, real-world inductive learning problems, the number of training
examples often must be limited due to the costs associated with procuring,
preparing, and storing the training examples and/or the computational costs
associated with learning from them. In such circumstances, one question of
practical importance is: if only n training examples can be selected, in what
proportion should the classes be represented? In this article we help to answer
this question by analyzing, for a fixed training-set size, the relationship
between the class distribution of the training data and the performance of
classification trees induced from these data. We study twenty-six data sets
and, for each, determine the best class distribution for learning. The
naturally occurring class distribution is shown to generally perform well when
classifier performance is evaluated using undifferentiated error rate (0/1
loss). However, when the area under the ROC curve is used to evaluate
classifier performance, a balanced distribution is shown to perform well. Since
neither of these choices for class distribution always generates the
best-performing classifier, we introduce a budget-sensitive progressive
sampling algorithm for selecting training examples based on the class
associated with each example. An empirical analysis of this algorithm shows
that the class distribution of the resulting training set yields classifiers
with good (nearly-optimal) classification performance.
