 WASHINGTON AP - The Supreme Court on Wednesday put on hold a lower court order that would have permitted curbside voting in Alabama in November. The justices vote was 5-3, with the courts three liberals dissenting. As is typical when the Supreme Court acts on an emergency basis, the justices in the majority did not explain their decision. It was not clear how many counties might have offered curbside voting, allowing people to vote from their car by handing their ballot to a poll worker. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a dissent joined by Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Elena Kagan, described the lower courts order allowing curbside voting in November as modest, and she said she would not have put it on hold. It does not require all counties to adopt curbside voting; it simply gives prepared counties the option to do so. This remedy respects both the right of voters with disabilities to vote safely and the States interest in orderly elections, she said, noting that 28 states permit curbside voting. The decision stemmed from a lawsuit the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program filed on behalf of voters with health issues who were concerned about the risk of COVID-19 at the polls. The states Republican attorney general and secretary of state sought to block a lower courts ruling in the case that would have let counties offer curbside voting. Lawyers for the state argued that since Alabama does not have a law expressly permitting curbside voting, that it should not be allowed. I am very enthusiastic that the Supreme Court of the United States has seen fit to secure Alabamas election integrity by ruling as to the letter and the spirit of the law, Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill said in a telephone... 