<prompt> Human: Broke up with long time gf this weekend.Prior to relationship I bought a condo with a total payment of around 1400 per month for pI and property tax.For the last 5y3m the ex cohabitated with me. Our verbal agreement was that we would pay the monthly bills proportional to our income. This meant approx that she paid 35 of the monthly mortgage note along with other utilities.Now after the break-up she is requesting that I reimburse her for the portion of her 5 years of payments that went towards the mortgage principle. Arguing that I got to keep that money via home equity and that she is not going to let me profit off of her.An extremely quick Calc rings this up to 5000.Does she have any legal basis in this request? We had no formal written document outlining the conditions of our cohabitation nor any kind of landlordtenant agreement.Thanks!Assistant: No we had no written agreement. She is not on title, deed or mortgage note.Several years ago I told her I was willing to add her to the deed if she also would be added to the note...she declined citing that she didnt want to be responsible for the mortgage were I to decide to default, even if it meant not having any legal claim to the home.  <response>: she declined citing that she didnt want to be responsible for the mortgage were I to decide to default, even if it meant not having any legal claim to the home.Exactly. She had no skin in the game. No risk, no equity. 