<prompt> Human: At my job I was initially hired as a contractor for this hybrid position partly copywriting, and partly Proofing Quality Assurance. Over a year ago I was hired full time as a copywriter only, as only that role and with its associated responsibilities.Now management is trying to offload significant proofing responsibilities back onto me, and they will impact my copywriting workload.They are doing this because 2 people who used to do the proofing on my team are leaving.So, do I just suck it up and make sure the replacements take their work back when they are hired management wont like this because they think these 2 positions shouldnt do it in the first place?Do I request a raise now due to added responsibilities and a change in job role? How do I frame that discussion? And if I did secure a raise, I wouldnt be relieved of this extra work in the future, which would suck, and drive me to find a new job.Any other recommendations?  <response>: If you were hired explicitly as a full time copywriter, and they try to give you additional stuff to do thats clearly outside the scope of your contract, then id argue suggesting a hefty raise would be in order.After all, if they want you to do your own job the job of 2 other people, for the same pay, your effectively hourly wage is slashed by 67.unless you are paid by the hour and have access to all the overtime you want and are comfortable with working more in order to earn moreThe way i see it, there are 4 options.1: you agree to take on the extra work for no extra money and the company hires 2 replacements who do something else than the people they are replacing. You end up working a whole lot more than you used to without this being reflected in your paycheck, leading to burnout and bitterness on your end, probably resulting in you leaving your job.2: you agree to taking on the extra work for a big raise. The company hires 2 replacements with different tasks than the people they replace.3: You refuse to take on the extra work as this is outside the scope of your contract, the company hires 2 replacements with the same tasks as the people they replace.4: You refuse to take on the extra work as this is outside the scope of your contract, the company hires 2 replacements with different tasks than the people they replace: and you suggest that since the job of proofing needs to be done by _someone_, they hire additional people and spin the proofing off to a different team since they apparently dislike the structure of how the job is being done right now. If they insist on you taking on the extra work without it being reflected by a raise, and insisting that the replacements be given something else to do, i would suggest looking for another job.Why work at a place that is unwilling to pay your worth? 