<prompt> Human: Using a throwaway because some of my co-workers know of my regular account.I work in a company with around 25 people, Im the website graphics marketing guy. We do fairly good business and are in great financial health. We probably could be doing a lot better, but the website where much of our products are marketed is pretty much broken. It was built and badly mismanaged before I came on board about a year ago.This past week, Ive been tasked with working with a design firm to completely re-do our site. Theyll be building the basic template and getting our SEO in order, Ill be organizing and inputting the content, as well as tweaking the design and creating the graphics for our needs. Its basically all Ill be doing over the course of a month, and by doing that part in-house myself, Im saving the company approximately 10K to 20K.Now that Im being put in such a crucial position where such a big project is solely in my hands, is it time to re-negotiate anything? Im making far less than my peers in my position in other similar companies, and I also dont have the benefit of working many hours from home like they do.I know Im fully capable of doing well with this website project, so thats not the issue. I hesitate to bring up a re-negotiation after the fact because the job will already be done and I wont have as much leverage. But if I lightly approach the subject now, it would make my boss realize how critical I am and approach the subject from my perspective much more.Any thoughts on this? How should I play this?  <response>: Im saving the company approximately 10K to 20KThats really not that much money. Do not even bother arguing that point. What you need to argue is that the new sites will gain X number of dollars once they are launched, and not that I saved 10-20K by doing this.I will just say that it will be highly unlikely someone will reward you with a raise for a project you havent even done yet, when you are specifically asking for a raise because of that project.And as for the crucial part, the other comment is right. In the end, no one is irreplaceable. It might delay the project, or need to pull in more resources, but it would get done regardless, if it needed to.If you are going in for your review, I would focus more on the fact that you are paid less than market average, if thats true, and ask if there is anything they can do to be more competitive. Then use this project as proof that you are an asset, but dont use the project itself as the excuse to get a raise. Just use it as evidence to back up your claim that you are valuable, and should be paid more towards market specs. 