<prompt> Human: I had about 5-6 different employers in about 20 years of work. Most hiring were very standard and as comfortable as that process can be.The one I am doing now was pushing during the interviews with trick questions until nobody without the actual book in front of him could possible answer. Made me feel bad during the interview until I realized after that nobody could possibly answer this from memory. Then the offer came and after we spoke salary and everything seemed fine the offer comes in at 2 less than what was discussed. Not a big thing but somehow its also like saying we are doing this just to put you in your place. And to top it off the contract says I have to give 90 days notice if I leave but they dont have to do the same to fire me. They can then decide to apply the 90 days or not so basically if I ever want to leave I will not know until then if I am getting another 3 months of work and pay or none at all. All other contracts I ever had were for 2 weeks notice.Edit: Got a counter offer for full agreed upon salary and 60 days. Seems like they never really enforce it but either way I can work with that. Thanks for the comments.Edit2: I get and agree with all those that said to pass and go with my gut feeling. I will try anyway to see if its just a weird hiring process. If I decide I do not like the environment after a few days Im sure they wont want to keep me for another 60 days and if they do well I get paid anyway.Assistant: To answer your top line question. Yes, I judge employers on how they act. That includes how I am treated during the interview process. Personally, I would not draw a negative conclusion from the hard questions during the interview process. Seeing how someone deals with a question you know they cannot answer perfectly is not a bad way of evaluating them. I would not like being offered less than was discussed unless it was a mistake and I really believed them when they explained how it happened.On the 90 days notice, are you in the US? Is this an actual employment contract or are you simply describing their employee policies?edit: left out a not that completely changed the meaning of what I meant to write.Human: This is in Canada, Quebec. Apparently its legal for them to ask for it in a civil contract but nobody can tell me if it would hold up in court. Even in HR nobody knows of anyone ever attempting this.  <response>: Notice prior leaving is common courtesy in Quebec. But to enforce such a policy they would have to take you to civil court sue you for the prejudice you caused them. On the other hand, they have to give you a notice or pay you even without working there before firing you based on the time worked there. If they dont, you can report them to the Commission des normes du travail.Notice of terminationLayoffNot a lawyer of any kind, just did a bit of research.Concerning your offer, you can either let it slide or make a counter and final offer of you initial salary 10 and 2 week notice.This way their either take you seriously or let you go and if you want to leave without notice they have a lot less to sue you for.EDITJust found this on the same website concerning the notice you have to give your employer:What notice must an employee give his employer when he quits his job?While there is no mention of any requirement that an employee give his employer notice under the Act respecting labour standards, article 2091 of the Civil Code of Québec stipulates that a reasonable notice must be given by an employee who resigns. The reasonable notice must notably take into account the nature of the job, the particular circumstances under which this job is carried out, as well as the duration of the work. 