<prompt> Human: In 2015 I co-founded a startup with two colleagues. After patenting and obtaining money from a few accelerators, we are now able to employ the other two co-founders full time.I am not interested enough in the business world and the area that our business operates in, and Ive taken a different direction with my career. However, I have put a large amount of work into the business for the past two years.My colleagues want to introduce a clause into the founders agreement that says that unless I work a certain number of hours a week for the company then I wont be able to vest my equity back. Eventually my equity will drop to a minimum of 10 of the founders equity. This would go indefinitely, so even if I do the minimum hours for the next three years and retain my equity, I will still lose equity in years to come when I dont have time to keep the extra hours up. My two co-founders will be fully salaried during this time and will split my equity that I dont retain through vesting.What is a normalappropriatefair deal in these scenarios? I realise that I wont be doing much work for the company and any increase in valuation will be due to their work. However, equally they will be salaried whilst I wouldnt.  <response>: Sounds like theyre trying to give you the Wozniak treatment. Dont let them. 