<prompt> Please answer with one of the option in the bracket. Write reasoning in between . Write answer in between .Q:A 81-year-old man presents to his cardiologist for ongoing management of mild heart failure. He has not had any changes in his cardiac function status and says that he is tolerating lisinopril without any major side effects. During the course of the visit, the patient says that he is unhappy with his urologist because he has been experiencing episodes of dizziness after starting prazosin for benign prostatic hyperplasia. He says that he feels these episodes were caused by malpractice on his urologists behalf and is considering a lawsuit against his urologist. Which of the following is the most appropriate course of action for the cardiologist?? A: Call the urologist and warn him of an impending lawsuit, B: Call the urologist to convey the patients dissatisfaction, C: Contact his insurance agent to discuss possible risks, D: Encourage the patient to speak with his urologist directly, E: Sympathize with the patients desire for a lawsuit,  <response>: This is a question about the appropriate professional conduct of a physician when a patient expresses dissatisfaction with another physicians care. The key points are:- The patient is experiencing side effects dizziness after starting a new medication prescribed by his urologist. - The patient believes this was due to malpractice and is considering a lawsuit against the urologist.- The cardiologist is seeing the patient for a routine visit and the patient brings this issue up. The choices present different actions the cardiologist could take, ranging from directly getting involved to remaining uninvolved and neutral. The cardiologists role here should be to maintain professional relationships and encourage direct communication between the patient and his urologist.D: Encourage the patient to speak with his urologist directly 