<prompt> Please answer with one of the option in the bracket. Write reasoning in between . Write answer in between .Q:A 28-year-old research assistant is brought to the emergency department for severe chemical burns 30 minutes after accidentally spilling hydrochloric acid on himself. The burns cover both hands and forearms. His temperature is 37C 98.6F, pulse is 112min, respirations are 20min, and blood pressure is 10882 mm Hg. Initial stabilization and resuscitation is begun, including respiratory support, fluid resuscitation, and cardiovascular stabilization. The burned skin is irrigated with saline water to remove the chemical agent. Which of the following is the most appropriate method to verify adequate fluid infusion in this patient?? A: Heart rate, B: The Parkland formula, C: Blood pressure, D: Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, E: Urinary outputn,  <response>: This is a question about fluid resuscitation in a patient with severe chemical burns. The key points in the question stem are that the patient has extensive burns covering both hands and forearms, and initial stabilization and resuscitation has begun, including fluids. The question asks about the most appropriate method to verify adequate fluid infusion. Options A, C, and D can be affected by many factors besides fluid status. The Parkland formula can help guide initial fluid administration but does not provide ongoing verification of adequacy. Monitoring urinary output is considered the best way to assess the adequacy of resuscitation in burn patients. An hourly urine output of 0.5-1 mlkghr is a reasonable target.E: Urinary output 