<prompt> Please answer with one of the option in the bracket. Write reasoning in between . Write answer in between .Q:A 19-year-old woman is diagnosed with metastatic Ewing sarcoma. She has undergone multiple treatments without improvement. She decides to stop treatment and pursue only palliative care. She is of sound mind and has weighed the benefits and risks of this decision. The patients mother objects and insists that treatments be continued. What should be done?? A: Continue treatments until the patient has a psychiatric evaluation., B: Follow the wishes of the patients mother as she has decision making power for the patient., C: Halt treatments and begin palliative care., D: Try to seek additional experimental treatments that are promising., E: Continue treatment because otherwise, the patient will die.,  <response>: This is a medical ethics question involving a patients right to refuse treatment. The patient is an adult of sound mind who has decided to stop curative treatment and pursue palliative care after weighing the risks and benefits. Even though the mother objects, the patient has the right to make her own medical decisions. The correct answer should respect the patients autonomy and wishes.C: Halt treatments and begin palliative care. 