<prompt> Please answer with one of the option in the bracket. Write reasoning in between . Write answer in between .Q:A randomized double-blind controlled trial is conducted on the efficacy of 2 different ACE-inhibitors. The null hypothesis is that both drugs will be equivalent in their blood-pressure-lowering abilities. The study concluded, however, that Medication 1 was more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than medication 2 as determined by a p-value 0.01 with significance defined as p 0.05. Which of the following statements is correct?? A: This trial did not reach statistical significance., B: There is a 0.1 chance that medication 2 is superior., C: There is a 10 chance that medication 1 is superior., D: We can fail to accept the null hypothesis., E: We can accept the null hypothesis.,  <response>: This is a question about interpreting the results of a randomized controlled trial that compared two medications. The null hypothesis was that the medications would have equivalent blood pressure lowering effects. The study found that Medication 1 lowered blood pressure significantly more than Medication 2, with a p-value 0.01. This means the probability of obtaining these results if the null hypothesis were true is less than 1. Since the pre-defined significance level was p 0.05, the study has demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the two medications. We can therefore reject the null hypothesis that the medications are equivalent.D: We can fail to accept the null hypothesis. 