 In terms of user acceptability, clients gave the Goals Form a mean rating of 4.2 on a 5-point helpfulness scale SD 1.2, n 17, with a median and modal rating of 5 very helpful. Ten of the 17 respondents 58.8 gave it this highest rating. By contrast, the mean rating of the PHQ-9 was 3.7 SD 1.0, n 17, with a median and modal rating of 4 helpful. Intro to change interview Cooper et al., 2015. In terms of why the Goals Form was helpful, five interviewees in Cooper et al.s 2015 study said that it gave them a sense of progress, both from session to session and over the course of therapy. Interviewee 1, for instance, said: It kind of gave me a barometer on what I was doing. Five of the participants said that it gave focus and structure to the therapy, reminding them of what they had come to work on and where you want to be at the end Interviewee 10. Interviewee 6, for instance, said: Im a very scatty mind...because I was very depressed I couldnt concentrate and then its helpful to have something in black and white on paper because then you knew this is what you were working at. Two of the interviewees said the Goals Form was helpful because it encouraged them to reflect on how they had gone about achieving their objectives, and one said that they had felt challenged by it. In terms of negative aspects of the Goals Form, two participants said that they did not feel that they were good at naming goals, particular at the start of their therapy. Two of the interviewees said that they had been confused by the constant changes in goals, and one said that they felt the form needed to be explained more clearly. 