 Data will consist of participant interviews recorded and transcribed by the researcher. Following the methodology of Colaizzi 1978, the interviews are read multiple times to immerse the researcher in each participants text and achieve a collective impression or feeling for the whole. Following this, significant statements are selected from each interview which pertain to the phenomenon under investigation. Meanings of these statements are formulated hermeneutically i.e., interpreted by the researcher. These meanings are then grouped according to themes identified by the researcher. All meanings must be considered. An exhaustive description of the phenomenon under investigation is then written which focuses on the universal, essence that lies on the other side of the concreteness of lived meaning. The researcher then returns to the participants for validation of the meanings, clusters, and descriptions. Finally, new data obtained from participants are incorporated into the structure of the research. Prior to conducting interviews and throughout the entire research process, a log is kept of the researchers presuppositions about the investigated topic. This acknowledgement of the researchers viewpoint assists in setting these pre-conceived ideas aside in order to come to direct terms and meanings as lived by the participants. One authors contribution to the methodology comes in his approach to the interpretations of the text. He describes the following components of phenomenological interpretation: 1. turning to the nature of lived experience, 2. investigating the lived experience, 3. hermeneutical phenomenological reflection, 4. hermeneutical phenomenological writing, 5. maintaining a strong and oriented relation, and 6. balancing the research context by considering parts and whole. These interpretive relationships are not linear steps; they form a guideline for all phenomenological reflection and writing. 