do you deliberately juxtapose predictable, almost tropey lyrical rhymes (song/wrong, day/away, blue/true/you) with unpredictable and unprecedented, un-tropey subject matter (e.g. "2+2" etc. in la de da, verse 2 of mt. st. helens, last stanza of new canaan)? or does it just seem to work out that way? anyway i think it does a great job of proving that even the most """"""predictable"""""" rhyme can become vivacious and fresh if you don't keep forcing it into the same stupid line it's been stuck in for years against its will
that reminds me of ingredients. don't eat the ingredients individually, but also don't insist on using entirely brand new ingredients for every single ingredient every single time