Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ use any gguf connector to interact with gguf file(s), i.e., [connector](https://
|
|
24 |
- bug fixed following the guide written by [unsloth](https://unsloth.ai/blog/phi4)
|
25 |
- tool used for quantization: [cutter](https://pypi.org/project/gguf-cutter)
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
### appendices: model summary and quality (written by microsoft)
|
28 |
|
29 |
#### model summary
|
@@ -58,6 +61,3 @@ to understand the capabilities, we (here refer to microsoft side) compare `phi-4
|
|
58 |
| Reasoning | DROP | 75.5 | 68.3 | 85.5 | 79.3 | **90.2** | 76.7 | 80.9 |
|
59 |
|
60 |
\* these scores are lower than those reported by Meta, perhaps because simple-evals has a strict formatting requirement that Llama models have particular trouble following.
|
61 |
-
|
62 |
-
### citation
|
63 |
-
[Phi-4 Technical Report](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.08905)
|
|
|
24 |
- bug fixed following the guide written by [unsloth](https://unsloth.ai/blog/phi4)
|
25 |
- tool used for quantization: [cutter](https://pypi.org/project/gguf-cutter)
|
26 |
|
27 |
+
### citation
|
28 |
+
[Phi-4 Technical Report](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.08905)
|
29 |
+
|
30 |
### appendices: model summary and quality (written by microsoft)
|
31 |
|
32 |
#### model summary
|
|
|
61 |
| Reasoning | DROP | 75.5 | 68.3 | 85.5 | 79.3 | **90.2** | 76.7 | 80.9 |
|
62 |
|
63 |
\* these scores are lower than those reported by Meta, perhaps because simple-evals has a strict formatting requirement that Llama models have particular trouble following.
|
|
|
|
|
|